tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post1934984436008064062..comments2023-06-21T10:26:47.525-05:00Comments on ("RAM").........Red Alert Moderates: DeterminacyUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-81737435106391864772011-08-21T00:07:23.381-05:002011-08-21T00:07:23.381-05:00The world is in financial crisis, so, to let no cr...The world is in financial crisis, so, to let no crisis go to waste, out comes the Gay Agenda to tell us we should least of all be concerned with it. This is strange to me, because it seems obvious that decent civilization depends on families, guided by assimilating values, to inculcate sustainable values through the generations. The alternative is to redefine words so that family, marriage, values, and charity have no reliable meanings. The purpose of families transmitting assimilating and civilizing values is to keep government from taking over those functions. The alternative is for government more and more to usurp the role of parents. Once we move from traditional to communal and poly families, the next step is ever more governmental regulation of interrelational "rights." I agree, keep government out of adult bedrooms. I don't agree that it is necessary in order to accomplish that to force taxpayers to fund "rights" to require that gays must be entitled to require that states and the union are forbidden from giving special incentives to the traditonal family unit for rearing the next generations. I don't see that as a "right," nor as a good idea. I see it as piling on during an economic meltdown in order to further accelerate the unraveling of sustainable, small government, civilization. The Gay Agenda is synonymous with ever increasing governmental intrusions. We already have taxpayers funding teachers to inculcate Johnny why it is perfectly normal for Freddie to have two mommies. This is not necessary. It is one thing to assert a right to acquire life insurance to provide for a close intimate. It is another thing to require, as a matter of "right," that taxpayers must force all pension plans and all tax exemption claims to provide for it. There is no such a "right," unless and until citizen taxpayers vote to fund and allow it. When they do, I shall believe they have lost their collective minds.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com