tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post2163210086547769953..comments2023-06-21T10:26:47.525-05:00Comments on ("RAM").........Red Alert Moderates: What Needs To Be DoneUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-87210909397196257532016-04-03T12:37:15.682-05:002016-04-03T12:37:15.682-05:00To my mind, we don't directly sense God. The ...To my mind, we don't directly sense God. The only sense we have of God is not through quantitative senses but through our qualitative sense of beingness. A person can be in good faith and be receptive regarding the innate and spiritually empathetic guidance of the Reconciler, without having committed to memory all the various and wondrous figures of speech as are set out in the Bible (my fav being the KJV). <br /><br />So I don't consider Donald a failed Christian merely because he, like myself and every human being, is a sinner or an infrequent church goer.<br /><br />To my sense, Donald wants to salvage America from an evil Establishment. The America he wants to salvage is one that, under God, respects and accords human decency, dignity, and freedom. Donald gets it, that without respect for God, America is less than nothing. So I think Donald DOES have the spirit of God residing within him.<br /><br />Concerning the fruit of his life, I noticed a woman at one of his rallies, suffering from terminal cancer, came to thank him for his encouragement to her. Have not his employees, including women, also rallied to say he is a good employer? Has Donald tried to make money by betting against America, while using influence to hurt America in order to improve his bets? Does Donald not want to restore America as a beacon of hope for humanity and what it means to be a human being?<br /><br />Who is the most shallow: those who judge unctous snakery to be pro-woman, or those who by their works actually serve women, as well as America?<br /><br />My idea of evil pertains to anyone and anything that is devoted to farming people as cattle, by putting a fascist boot on their necks in order to exert power and extort plunder. I don't care if the fascism is dressed in fine clothing and unctous promises: fascist reduction of human freedom of thought, speech, expression, and action is the epitome of evil. <br /><br />As near as I can ascertain, Trump is against all those things. That makes Trump the opponent of evil. Quite unlike the kind of leaders so admired by people of the persuasions of PC, choomery, open borders, apologetics for evil and musloidism, reparations, forced redistribution, gov "charity," socialism, minority supremacy, pedophilia, open marriage, marriage to the gov, and regulation out the wazoo.<br /><br />**************<br /><br />An example that bums me: I get that minorities, especially Blacks, have been groomed by the Uniparty to feel entitled to demand to know of candidates: What will you do for me and "my kind?" I want to grab them by the throats and shout: Scum! If either Trump or Cruz were to salvage the republic, that would avail your freedom and dignity! That IS servicing your kind!<br /><br />Also the low class "WOW" people. They ask: What will you do to serve women? Look, dammmit! If the republic is salvaged, that is as good a service for women, as well as for every other citizen, as anyone has a right to expect of the Fed Gov.<br /><br />Somewhere along the line, chivalry took a wrong turn down a rotten alley, where it got hijacked by all manner of multi-culti special snowflake entitlement-mongers.<br /><br />If, like swarms of parasites, Farmable People (Commies) persist in helping the Establishment (Cronies) bite the Producing Class at every possible line of attack, the host will die. And the void will be filled by subhuman rapists, murderers, plunderers, and jihadis.<br /><br />They think they are SO CLOSE to completing the fundamental transformation to socialist utopia. In reality, they are SO CLOSE to destroying human freedom and dignity for a millennium. Open season on the open society by the open predators and parasites. But heyboy -- minorities and feminazis -- just keep powdering your hair, perfuming your buttes, wearing your pants on the down low, voting Dem, and slamming Conservers of Liberty.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-14856784195201583922016-04-03T09:42:06.992-05:002016-04-03T09:42:06.992-05:00IF Cruz were able to fund his campaign without get...IF Cruz were able to fund his campaign without getting so deep in bed with the establishment, and if he were more consistent behind the scenes, then, based on how he presents himself, he would be my candidate.<br /><br />I do wince at some of Trump's come backs. Watching him do a town hall with Anderson Cooper, looking at the people on the screen behind him, I could not help but think that I would be quite concerned about a lot of them if they were on my jury. That said, he is right on many points, and the establishment probably won't be able to control him. I worry about who he would nominate for Scotus.<br /><br />I think the viciousness between Trump and Cruz is harmful to both of them and to America. They need to debate issues, as gentlemen. (Problem is, that may be a first. There was little that was gentlemanly about debates among Adams, Jefferson, Burr, Hamilton [I know he was not a candidate, but he carried a lot of water], John Quincy, Jackson, Wilson, Taft, TR, LBJ, Bush, Clinton, Obama, etc.) We are at such a tipping point that we need some decency so whoever becomes the nominee will have a chance.<br /><br />When Trump has been in a race among three or more, he has been good at increasing opponents' negatives enough to beat them. It is not at all clear that he would be able to do that in a two way race. If he faced Cruz one on one, would Trump prevail? That is doubtful, and so it is concerning whether he can beat Hillary by increasing her negatives. Especially since the media will not likely volunteer to help him do that. So, what could Cruz do, to neutralize Hillary enough to beat her?<br /><br />Although Trump is not a good debater on arcane points (well, even on non-arcane points), he will not shy from going after Hillary. He has funding. He probably has more appeal to a wider base than Cruz.<br /><br />We would have a clearer picture if we could have some substantive, one-on-one dabates between Trump and Cruz -- to test who would most likely be able to defeat Hillary and the corrupt establishment that she fronts. I don't see any candidates, other than Trump and Cruz, who could supply what we need to redirect the establishment.<br /><br />Both Trump and Cruz carry big deficiencies, but they are still head and shoulders better than anyone else. And both are probably considerably better than anything we have been served since 1988. It is because of all the wrong kinds of vetting that many of us have been made so squeamish about both of them. It would be great if a billionaire were to say to Cruz, "Don't worry about funding. I've got your back. Just do the right thing by the American people."<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com