tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post4495373860349297546..comments2023-06-21T10:26:47.525-05:00Comments on ("RAM").........Red Alert Moderates: A Tale of Two VisionsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-151069640475824302011-02-17T07:40:19.869-06:002011-02-17T07:40:19.869-06:00Maybe our problem is that social conservatives and...Maybe our problem is that social conservatives and libertarians each carry among them those who have a liberal (fascist) bent, in that they would deploy government to intrude where it ought not. For example, value-conservative Christians seem split between those who believe big social programs are a proper form of "charity" and those who do not. And Libertarians are split by those who deem it less important to get our fiscal house in order than to deploy government to address such shattering needs as, you know: government sponsorship of gay marriage; repeal of DADT; rights of Muslim (and other) polygamists; accomodation in the public square of Muslim sensibilities; and the active use of government regulations and ACLU money in order to ban any accomodation in the public square of Christian sensibilities. Indeed, it gets weird sometimes, how some Libertarians twist the trends, to make it sound like it is only social conservatives who are frenetically using government to force a reshaping of social values. It raises the suspicion these so called Libertarians would toss fiscal concerns in a heartbeat and join with the openly Progressives if they sensed by doing so that they could put Gaia on top of God, once and for all. There is one very big reason why this controversy Is Not going to subside very much: It needs only one more twisted Supreme Court Justice to put America into a state of utter degeneracy, permanently. Beware the faux fiscal conservative in libertarian clothing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com