tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post71961712898067668..comments2023-06-21T10:26:47.525-05:00Comments on ("RAM").........Red Alert Moderates: Social Cycles of Diminishing ReturnsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger71125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-29069039852973474302015-03-24T10:43:55.754-05:002015-03-24T10:43:55.754-05:00From AT: Re: all modern-day systems -- whether fi...From AT: Re: all modern-day systems -- whether financial, infrastructural or educational -- are vulnerable when moral restraint is gone. The more complex and interconnected our systems become, the greater the risks when they fail.<br /><br />It is reasonable to derive a civilizing moral code under a conceptualization of a higher Principle or Spiritual Reconciler. But that is only the beginning. Without inculcation, such as in respect of a Moses or Jesus, people tend to follow those who facilitate their basest and most immediate desires. Like the "perfect (pedophile) messenger" so revered by musloids.<br /><br />Under the influence of moralists like muslims, commies, hackers and corporatists, Lofos are easily bribed. Corrupti are conspiratorily incentived. When the majority of an electoral demographic comes to consist of ignoranti and corrupti, those who advocate for codes that can sustain decent social values are quickly swept aside. At that point, the law becomes a handmaiden to the biggest pretenders and swindlers and their easily bribed and useful idiots. A population that loses its compass in respect of an assimilating moral principler becomes carrion to buzzards. Ted Cruz is right. Evil has set the world on fire.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-62141937422548586692015-03-24T10:42:47.008-05:002015-03-24T10:42:47.008-05:00Businesses need to produce stuff that people want ...Businesses need to produce stuff that people want that they can afford to buy. Today, the only way many businesses can produce and consumers can buy is with gov assistance. So much so that gov can't fund the assistance with tax revenues without printing ever more fiat money. As our society becomes less competitive, there is no way our gov can tax its way out of debt that accelerates ever faster and out of control. So long as the rest of the world does not clearly see this or continues to believe the dollar is the last curency standing, this whackiness can float on cheap goods produced for our consumption abroad.<br /><br />At some point, the search for a more stable economic base will stress nations and their oligarchic rulers into out of control wars. It may come to pass that the only way our progeny can hope to promote some few survivors to begin anew is to throw off the dead weight of all who have put corrupt debt on them. That's when the next round of socialistic-fascists may begin to unite behind propagandists against "useless eaters." That's when many pc lofos will be turned like cattle to a kind-less and un-gentle form of new-pc "liberalism." We elect Cruz and take our medicine now, or, by dithering, we wait to elect the devil as the last available repository of trust for godlessly corrupt and untrustworthy people.<br /><br />Bad Man's Blunder: This here toleration and promotion of godless, conscience-less, race-baiting, lying, dividing, lawless and incompetent addicts, aliens, bureaucrats and commies has just naturally got to stop!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-91346497731581807082015-03-24T10:42:07.785-05:002015-03-24T10:42:07.785-05:00I wonder what diversionary stunts and outrages wil...I wonder what diversionary stunts and outrages will be pulled by the Economically Progressve Star Chamber when the people begin mooing in earnest, rising towards a flux of worldwide stampedes?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-5753077150037232832015-03-24T10:41:51.246-05:002015-03-24T10:41:51.246-05:00Conservatives know in their bones that Obama is no...Conservatives know in their bones that Obama is not a nice guy and that he has given us every reason to fear. Cruz knows it, too. Cruz also knows that the excess of domestic power that is centrally consolidated in the District of Corruption, unless divested, will continue to attract the excess of corrupt money. For the cause of corruption, central power begets the most bang for the buck. It attracts gangbanging buzzards like dead meat attracts bugs. If I were a buzzard or a maggot, I would fear Cruz, too.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-83585921562303865542015-03-24T10:41:18.598-05:002015-03-24T10:41:18.598-05:00Conservatives know in their bones that Obama is no...Conservatives know in their bones that Obama is not a nice guy and that he has given us every reason to fear. Cruz knows it, too. Cruz also knows that the excess of domestic power that is centrally consolidated in the District of Corruption, unless divested, will continue to attract the excess of corrupt money. For the cause of corruption, central power begets the most bang for the buck. It attracts gangbanging buzzards like dead meat attracts bugs. If I were a buzzard or a maggot, I would fear Cruz, too.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-53843261857555096642015-03-24T10:40:19.820-05:002015-03-24T10:40:19.820-05:00Is Queen Noor still a US citizen? It appears she d...Is Queen Noor still a US citizen? It appears she does not pay US taxes, although she may not have formally renounced. ElizabethTaylor renounced twice, but regaining citizenship was not difficult. As to Churchill, the law at his time did not make him a citizen (although he was made an honorary citizen).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-32770617582914538002015-03-22T21:53:12.523-05:002015-03-22T21:53:12.523-05:00@Homeschool,
Thx for the kind words. I do not q...@Homeschool, <br /><br />Thx for the kind words. I do not quest to comprehend complete perfection, but only the explanation that I, myself, can honestly believe is the best one for relating the different roles for measurable science and immeasurable spirituality. I do not for a second believe that God wishes for me to be intellectually dishonest just to appease a regime. Moreover, I believe God wants each of us to mature in our beliefs and orientations, to improve upon the way we apply them to unfolding challenges. For this quest, unfolding concepts of science are relevant, but not sufficient. Nor can rote repetition of theocratic formulizations keep up with emerging concepts. After all, what can reasonably be said of the soul of an Artificial Intelligence? Or of unfolding discoveries concerning the intelligence of animals? Or of the capacity for digitized algorithms to correlatively represent almost everything? If one is content to live in the past, one may be satisfied with long-repeated rote mantras as "answers" for keeping one in the past. <br /><br />However, if one seeks a mature theosophy, one must not fear trying to reconcile unfolding concepts concerning the measurable cosmos with concepts of moral assimilation. To restrict oneself to the Bible is to attempt moral reconciliation to the sciences of the present while wearing the rote blinders of the past. One must read from both books: The book of the Bible and the book of the Cosmos. Otherwise, everyone of the ruled class would surrender his or her independent moral responsibility to the<br /> bafflegab of a pretended elite. Such surrender may be appealing to one who otherwise may feel overwhelmed with cognitive dissonance. So far, I do not feel that way. <br /><br />It seems to me that every wannabe ruling elitist tries to nurture a flock to espouse one revealed Truth that is sufficient for every specific purpose. Notice how Obama gets the red eye when his edict is not accepted. At some point, some among the flock will tend to notice that they likely are as good, smart, educated and competent to pray for and <br />to seek and receive guidance from God as is the busybody flock master.<br /><br />Thinkers are exploring some strange relationships. For example, there is the observer effect (measurement problem). If there is a two-way relationship between conscious apprehension and manifestation, what may be the character of this effect? There may be conundrums concerning how appearances of chronologies are preserved or telescoped for different perspectives operating from differing contexts. Are measurements within the cosmos reconciled and renormalized, such that the space-scape appears to be of much the same density, regardless of the position of any observer? Conceptually, how is this seemingly automatic and responsive renormalization possible? What is the character of conscious identity?<br /><br />I wonder to what extent consensus among theoretical physicists regarding some of their grander and more encompassing postulations is preserved more by intimidation than by logic and measurement. Much as I wonder to what extent consensus among congregants tends to be preserved more by authoritarian intimidation than by honest or examined belief. I suspect some of the greatest thinkers did not happen upon all important insights because of any inevitable, algorithmic unfolding in the brain. I suspect some of those insights suddenly appeared in their minds, wholly shaped and almost out of nowhere. Without their necessarily having been thinking upon them, but simply recognizing an idea that suddenly took up residence within them. As if received as a gift from God. Now, imagine if they had been repressed because of political correctness among politicians, priests and scientists.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-30374001254789984702015-03-22T15:14:53.283-05:002015-03-22T15:14:53.283-05:00Tolstoy wrote The Kingdom of God is Within You. He...Tolstoy wrote The Kingdom of God is Within You. He seemed to take the Sermon on the Mount as trumping the Great Commandment and the the Golden Rule. Tolstoy was a wise man, but I do not think his advice as a purportedly wise lawgiver (solon) and Christian anarchist would well serve a decent and representative republic of human beings as they really are.<br /><br />I think people who adopt moral precepts without good faith judgment for specific circumstances are like sheep to the slaughter. I do not say morality is relative. I suggest it must be tempered in respect of the only absolute -- which is a caring Reconciler who is available to guide us, but not to tell us in every case precisely what we must do.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-87281050570550849822015-03-22T15:13:47.077-05:002015-03-22T15:13:47.077-05:00It sounds like you're picking and choosing, to...<br /><br />It sounds like you're picking and choosing, to assert Paul's authority over James and Simon. It may be interesting to consult what Jesus is represented to have said, directly. You seem to be saying the Godhead closes off from the child who prays to God, who may never have heard the name Jesus (or is it Yeshua? After all, what's in a name?), unless the child completes his prayer with a talisman ("in Jesus' name"). I do not believe in talismen or magical prayer beads.<br /><br />I believe Jesus has always existed, regardless of your name for Him. I think the child who prays in good faith is heard, because the prayer would not be heard unless it were in good faith. I think God knows good faith when He hears it. I leave the judgment of that to Him -- not you. And when He hears it, I thing that is the Jesus-aspect of the Godhead. But continue. I'm sure you will, with enough theosophizing, hit on the magical and complete formulization, to prove all others to be heresies. For that quest, here's a list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L....<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-56634831314984680542015-03-22T14:43:56.130-05:002015-03-22T14:43:56.130-05:00Obama favors socialistic colonization in order to ...Obama favors socialistic colonization in order to make most of the world submit to becoming the class of the ruled, under the rule of the rulers. Under his subjugation, he will grant peace. Obama favors every kind of elitist-ruled collectivization over the American Ideal of individual freedom of expression and enterprise. Thus, Obama favors jihadist colonization over the defense of America.<br /><br />In Obama's mind, it is shameful to oppose his program for imposing rule over those who are decent and independent by those who pay oz monkeys to destroy them. Obama "shames" us for opposing perverts who suck up tax money to groom our school children. Obama "shames" us for opposing the "reeducation" of children to the "sciences" of global warming, debt monetization, politically-correct speech, and tolerance for the collectivist destruction of freedom of thought. Obama "shames" us for opposing ghetto entitlement-mindedness and jihadi dhimification. Obama-the-Colonizer hates all those who would prefer to colonize on behalf of individual freedom.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-23614051958654470002015-03-22T14:43:24.932-05:002015-03-22T14:43:24.932-05:00Once America has been so fundamentally changed as ...Once America has been so fundamentally changed as no longer to be herself, who will defend her? The aliens who fled their banana republics because they were unfit to improve them? Not a chance!<br /><br />In every institution, America's leaders are being replaced with socialistic femimen and metrosexual socialists. Justices, Generals, Department Heads, Talking Heads, Profs, Pastors. Mostly all are worthless to the sustenance of a representative republic. Almost the only Leader who remains for Americans is the Spirit of the American Ideal, exemplified in the Second Amendment. Meanwhile, the collectivizing feminocracy is in a mind fire to confiscate all assault weapons.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-60643837537715972472015-03-22T14:42:47.097-05:002015-03-22T14:42:47.097-05:00It may be conceptualized that the Godhead is one, ...It may be conceptualized that the Godhead is one, yet of a trinitarian aspect. The Source-Essence-Purposer-Reconciler abides as a trinitarian flux that expresses Substance, Information and Consciousness. Under such a conceptualization, the sponsor of Substance may be conceptualized as the creating Father. In aspect of Information, the sponsor may be conceptualized as the accompanying Holy Ghost. In aspect of the Particular Exemplar of Consciousness, the sponsor may be conceptualized as the guiding Jesus.<br /><br />That our existentiality entails a trinitarian flux of Substance, Information and Consciousness seems self evident. Substance disperses, Information collects, and Consciousness (identities and memories) changes. The world of present manifestation in Substance is the world that is presented and created by the Godhead. Jesus' kingdom would not be of this world of present manifestation. Jesus' kingdom would be of the always receding, guiding potentiality of substance and information in Consciousness. In Jesus' kingdom, the battles are among empathies and ideas. Meanwhile, in the kingdom of manifested substance, there is no avoiding that the battles over ideas are represented in flesh and blood.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-72709598035023570952015-03-22T14:42:18.774-05:002015-03-22T14:42:18.774-05:00If you go to a cave to read only one Book, you wil...If you go to a cave to read only one Book, you will miss much of what is signified in the other Book -- the Book of the Cosmos. The Godhead speaks and signifies to everyone, not just book readers and mantra repeaters. I have read the Bible. Tell me what you think is in the Bible that is contrary to common sense. Or is the Bible (or your interpretation of it) a complete substitute for thinking? Are you, O Wise One, Jesus' mouthpiece? The Christian version of Mohammad?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-61068218170007634672015-03-22T14:41:52.100-05:002015-03-22T14:41:52.100-05:00Easy. The Godhead. Not you. Your "reasoning&q...Easy. The Godhead. Not you. Your "reasoning" sounds akin to Islamic mushmindedness about "there are no partners." Yes, the Godhead is one. Yet, it gives expression in three fundamental aspects. Those aspects are as obvious as everday experience, unless one were to deny that reality gives expression to Substance, Information and Consciousness. It is not for the "logic" of mortals to tell God that the Godhead cannot abide in three fundamental aspects. Especially, when the three aspects are so obvious to our direct experience.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-32113858378179383802015-03-22T14:41:14.418-05:002015-03-22T14:41:14.418-05:00Frankly, I find it laughable that you try to use a...Frankly, I find it laughable that you try to use a kind of reason to appeal to my reason to try to convince me not to reason! You see, I believe God gave us brains to use, to appreciate His miracles. You deny the god given right of each disciple of the Godhead to seek to intuit his way to meaningfulness as best he can, keeping always attuned as best he can to the guidance from the Godhead that unfolds all around him. IOW, you, like Muslims, deny the role of the participatory spirit and will of the individual. You replace that by scripture, subject to a proviso -- scripture as you interpret it. As if you were the latest incarnation of an authoritative mouthpiece for God. I don't buy it.<br /><br />I'll keep myself attuned to the one Godhead of the Cosmos, as best I am able. For that, I read the Bible, but much, much more. To me, this is what respect for the freedom and spiritual dignity of each individual is all about. To deny that, IMO, is to deny the American Ideal. It is to promote self-subjugation to self-elected elites. There are enough banana republics like that already. We don't need to help Obama impose one more, to make hell on earth. If you like your denial of a role for reason, you can keep your denial of a role for reason. Just don't join up to try to force it on me. Buck Farack.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-62893656866846199702015-03-22T14:40:21.170-05:002015-03-22T14:40:21.170-05:00I don't claim authority over truth. I only pos...I don't claim authority over truth. I only posit a conceptualization of truth that seems to avail sense for independent-minded republicans. I don't believe the Truth has revealed entire Truth to humanity because I do not believe mortals have capacity to comprehend entire Truth. If you are claiming some kind of mantle of truth under which to judge me or anyone else, I simply think you are mistaken.<br /><br />If you are asserting some kind of more specific relevance, rather than simply botting mantras, tell me what is wrong with championing the dignity of each individual to relate to the Godhead? Isn't Jesus the mediating presence, who guides each individual with regard to Jesus' eventual and ultimate judgment of each person and each act, as opposed to any merely mortal interloper? Are you advocating for some kind of priestlike theocracy, party collectivism or crony elitism, to be superior to each individual's good faith efforts to relate to the Godhead? Or are you just advocating (reasoning) for a mantra-like talisman, with no other specific relevance?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-2105078074558302182015-03-22T14:39:52.357-05:002015-03-22T14:39:52.357-05:00Re: " I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. ...Re: " I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No man comes to the Father but through Me."<br /><br />Of "common sense," much depends on how one approaches the conundrum that our existence is both scientifically quantitative and morally qualitative. Take the conscous aspect of man. Take Jesus as the aspect of conscious judgment of the Godhead. Under such a conceptualization, it would be consistent (common sense) that the consciousness of no man approaches the Godhead except through Jesus.<br /><br />REASONING AND MODELING: I am not able to "make sense" of anything without a model. A conceptualization. A good faith conceptualization would be one that TRIES to avail sense that is consistent, coherent, and complete. Even though no complete or perfect explanation is available to mortals.<br /><br />SIN: To be in a state of sin may be conceptualized as signifying a state of cosmological evolution. Moral Evolution. Conceptually, suffering and pleasuring may be less to atone for sin or to reward joy than to facilitate reconciliation to moral purposefulness. To be in a state of sin would be a state such that the Godhead (Changeless-Changer) is attuned and available to guide our communications to pursue meaningful dignity.<br /><br />SALVATION: Regarding heaven or hell, the issue of concern need not be how a body saves into spirit, but how a spirit pursues morally purposeful expression in a body.<br /><br />POTENTIALITY: Consider Jesus. Consider also Shakespeare, Newton, Franklin, Jefferson, Mozart, Einstein, Turing. Is it not ASTONISHING what can be expressed from the digital potential of the mind of the Godhead? But for Jesus, what would have come of moral philosophy throughout the world?<br /><br />PURPOSE: Investigate how intelligent and powerful each individual can be guided to become, while still preserving a civilization that can trust enough to avail decent freedom and dignity without annihilating itself.<br /><br />JESUS: The Consciousness as we relate to it that has special moral insight above all others into both the Substance and the Information would be the "only begotten Son" -- the apex for seeking to understand the Changeless-Changer.<br /><br />WHY DID JESUS SUFFER / EXEMPLAR: The way of evolution that is guided by the Godhead entails pleasure and pain. The Exemplar needed to exemplify both. To become an exemplar for humanity, He needed to experience the heights of joy and the depths of pain. This is less because men and mortals are purely evil than because they are incomplete, imperfect, and in need of guidance in how to face all potentials to our limits. It is not inconsistent to believe that a perfect exemplar, to best guide (save) mankind along a morally purposeful path, would need to experience suffering.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-15831270874652849142015-03-22T14:39:02.057-05:002015-03-22T14:39:02.057-05:00Tolstoy wrote The Kingdom of God is Within You. He...Tolstoy wrote The Kingdom of God is Within You. He seemed to take the Sermon on the Mount as trumping the Great Commandment and the the Golden Rule. Tolstoy was a wise man, but I do not think his advice as a purportedly wise lawgiver (solon) and Christian anarchist would well serve a decent and representative republic of human beings as they really are.<br /><br />I think people who adopt moral precepts without good faith judgment for specific circumstances are like sheep to the slaughter. I do not say morality is relative. I suggest it must be tempered in respect of the only absolute -- which is a caring Reconciler who is available to guide us, but not to tell us in every case precisely what we must do.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-65690969650605717872015-03-22T09:34:53.906-05:002015-03-22T09:34:53.906-05:00It may be conceptualized that the Godhead is one, ...It may be conceptualized that the Godhead is one, yet of a trinitarian aspect. The Source-Essence-Purposer-Reconciler abides as a trinitarian flux that expresses Substance, Information and Consciousness. Under such a conceptualization, the sponsor of Substance may be conceptualized as the creating Father. In aspect of Information, the sponsor may be conceptualized as the accompanying Holy Ghost. In aspect of the Particular Exemplar of Consciousness, the sponsor may be conceptualized as the guiding Jesus.<br /><br />That our existentiality entails a trinitarian flux of Substance, Information and Consciousness seems self evident. Substance disperses, Information collects, and Consciousness (identities and memories) changes. The world of present manifestation in Substance is the world that is presented and created by the Godhead. Jesus' kingdom would not be of this world of present manifestation. Jesus' kingdom would be of the always receding, guiding potentiality of substance and information in Consciousness. In Jesus' kingdom, the battles are among empathies and ideas. Meanwhile, in the kingdom of manifested substance, there is no avoiding that the battles over ideas are represented in flesh and blood.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-9525102229303152922015-03-22T09:33:51.197-05:002015-03-22T09:33:51.197-05:00If you go to a cave to read only one Book, you wil...If you go to a cave to read only one Book, you will miss much of what is signified in the other Book -- the Book of the Cosmos. The Godhead speaks and signifies to everyone, not just book readers and mantra repeaters. I have read the Bible. Tell me what you think is in the Bible that is contrary to common sense. Or is the Bible (or your interpretation of it) a complete substitute for thinking? Are you, O Wise One, Jesus' mouthpiece? The Christian version of Mohammad?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-2561895788758047772015-03-21T11:07:12.247-05:002015-03-21T11:07:12.247-05:00Bibi stated a fact that was secondary to a first f...Bibi stated a fact that was secondary to a first fact. The first fact is that minorities that have assimilated to have minority interests will tend more to vote as blocs in furtherance of such interests. The second fact is that Arabs tend to have less interest in preserving Israel's identity as a nation than other definable groups among Israel's citizens. How is this different from an American Republican urging employed people who have jobs to take time off from work to vote in order to offset minority voters, who tend to vote for special benefits at the general expense of the republic? How is this different from a radical operative sending buses to round up voters in minority neighborhoods to deliver them to the polls? How is this different from cynical operatives targeting political ads to bribe selected parts of an electorate? The utterly ignorant and hypocritical piety of liberals is vomit inducing. Is it racissst to say so?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-18141631249978193322015-03-21T11:06:33.452-05:002015-03-21T11:06:33.452-05:00There's nothing quite as odious as sheltered k...There's nothing quite as odious as sheltered knowitalls making intrusive decisions in areas for which they have no knowledge or experience. Prancing "experts" from both Western socialistic cultures and Eastern Islamic cultures are vigorously molesting their dependents and children, even as each points to the other for doing so. In both, the statist "experts" use parents and teachers to pollute the minds of dependents. Both groom their dependents for depraved exploitation in socially twisted forms of sex, drugs and violence.<br /><br />The West inculcates its approved versions of sex, drugs and violence via instruction with media in respect of various demented "artists"; the East inculcates its approved versions via frequent calls to prayer in respect of Mohammad, a thorougly demented exemplar.<br /><br />Although the specific approved forms of exploitation are different, the general nature is similar. The Iranian establishment indoctrinated parents to sacrifice their children as mine clearers. American establishmentarians are indoctrinating their population to force equalities among natural unequalities by forcing men who volunteer to fight to do so alongside femimen and women.<br /><br />Establishmentarians of both the East and the West tend to promote those ideas and ideals concerning equality, empathy and Godliness that support their own twisted purposes. They concern themselves less with what is needed to enhance and preserve a fair and representative republic under God than with what is needed to enhance and preserve their own power.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-54681022849724718892015-03-21T11:06:10.085-05:002015-03-21T11:06:10.085-05:00Everyone has to confront their own challenges. May...Everyone has to confront their own challenges. Maybe the comedian in Jackie was hurting from making bad choices while taking pleasure in trying to make sense of cultures whose values were divided in ethnicity and drugs. You don't have to be black to die this way. A musician friend died after he overindulged in assorted pleasures and became a street bum. Long after he forsook his family for cheap pleasures, he was found under an overpass, with guitar and syringe nearby.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-47760472304463670972015-03-21T11:05:41.077-05:002015-03-21T11:05:41.077-05:00What good thing does the BATFE do? Its activities ...What good thing does the BATFE do? Its activities may help ensure tax collection. It may help weaponize federal intimidation. But what good does it do? If we truly want to defend the nation against terrorists, would not much more good be done simply by stopping the invitations to muslims and illegals to invade us?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5320826620507241679.post-46603964755545994392015-03-21T11:05:14.674-05:002015-03-21T11:05:14.674-05:00Celebrating Lewinsky and the Clintons is the Left&...Celebrating Lewinsky and the Clintons is the Left's way to celebrate the general assault on the institution of marriage, to replace it with bureauctratic oversight to ensure pc-approved grooming, training, regulation, equality and taxation. Prog utopia is a gov-funded national brothel. Vice Land is the New Community Organization. The crotch-grab dance will soon be passé at all school dances.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com