Interesting Times:
Are Garry Trudeau, Jon Stewart, and Stephen Colbert the comic versions of David Brooks?
Are the following the curious beliefs of incurious “Trudeau Reasonists” (aka, “anti-conspiratists” or “anti-patternists”)?
1) There is no good reason to suspect that there is anything fishy about:
a) Obama’s seeming admiration for third world socialist movements (Hugo Chavez?);
b) The election of Pelosi as Speaker;
c) America’s (i.e., of the powers that run America’s politicians) lack of development of abundant, domestic energy resources;
d) America’s unwillingness to defend its borders or to restrict its immigrants to legal channels;
e) America’s undermining of requirements to prove eligibility to vote;
f) The devolution of content of college courses from entailing the analysis of fact-based trends to the inspiration of hatreds for America, Capitalism, and Social Conservatism --- based mainly on unexamined opinions;
g) The efforts to erect ever more speech codes, station blacklists, and federal controls to require “localism” --- all designed to insulate the general population (of “Trudeau’ian Reasonists”?) from attempts by Social Conservatives to explain their positions; and
h) The amplifying of voices of victim-mongers clamoring for reparations *against middle class social conservatives.
[*Note: Predatory billionaires, when non-domestic and "too big to fail," do not pay. Rather, the "payments" are made in blood, sweat, and tears worked out in "let's you and him fight" rivalries that are enticed between minorities and conservatives by side-betting billionaires who are covered and hedged with insurance (and, if that fails, by your tax payments, since they are "too big to fail"). For strife side-betters, our fights are their money-making opportunities. At least, so long as we remain unable to avert our attentions from shadows on a wall.]
2) There is no need even to consider tort reform to help resolve problems with scarcity and cost of health care, such as by reducing the influence of advocates for giving voice to dissension between middle-class conservatives and victim mongers of “entitlementarianism.”
3) There is no good reason to expect MSM to account for why it has been so reluctant to cover Van Jones’ background, or Obama’s obvious propensity for surrounding himself with whacked out radicals.
4) There is no good reason to suspect that international billionaires would be corrupt or smart enough to take advantage of, or to exacerbate, trends that could opportunize their elimination of any middle class with power to question or to counter them.
5) There is no “invisible elephant in the room,” consisting of an emerging syndicate of opportunity-following international billionaires (too big to fail?), forming alliances to carve up and reduce the rest of the world to its control by taking every possible measure to wipe out the power of any middle class of social conservatives of decent civilization.
6) There is no good reason to suspect that many international billionaires, national despots, or religious totalitarians are psychopaths, lacking any higher conscience or notion of moral accountability.
7) There is no good reason to expect Obama to come clean with information about his background, childhood, and education.
INDEED, to think there may be good reason to expect such information to be forthcoming is to be an anti-reasoning conspiratist. So there! Would sayeth a “reasonist” Garry Trudeau.
Sunday, September 6, 2009
Thursday, August 27, 2009
THE UNIVERSAL ALGORITHM
THE UNIVERSAL ALGORITHM:
RELATING META-POTENTIAL TO PHYSICAL-POTENTIAL:
Consider that Potential (God?) which cannot be measured in itself, but only in its relational expressions. Perhaps every unit, perspective, and combination of perspectives of that Potential is a sort of “holon” (“whole-part”), sharing constraint of its Identity to an Equation, which respects values for holding or representing: Consciousness, Relational capacity (Empathy?), and Shared directional orientation (Entropy?) for expanding exressions of a shared system of Space, Time, Matter, and Energy … as a set of units constrained to varying integer proportions. Perhaps every unit and perspective of that Potential shares and obeys the same mathematical limitations and relations.
Consider as if there are four main “dimensions,” of which all other dimensions are derivative. Consider the four main dimensions as Space (S), Time (T), Matter (M), and Energy (E). Consider that for some purposes such dimensions may be reducible to two, i.e., Space-Time (S-T) and Matter-Energy (M-E), each implicating the other. Consider that such relations among said dimensions as may be expressed to conscious experience or in measurably recordable information may also be as follows:
if there IS: 1s, 1T, AND 1M, THEN THERE MUST BE “W” E; AND
if there IS: 1E, 1T, AND 1M, THEN THERE MUST BE “X” S; AND
if there IS: 1E, is, AND 1T, THEN THERE MUST BE “Y” M; AND
if there IS: 1E, is, AND 1M, THEN THERE MUST BE “Z” T.
In other words, an Algorithm for prescribing mathematical relations among such four main dimensions need not posit a direct, one-on-one correllation between and among each of the four, so long as there is a higher level Pattern that controls their inter and intra expression.
Further, the Algorithm may facilitate Potential’s (God’s?) simultaneous ruling (or igniting) of any number of derivative potentials or sub-equations, so that each change in each higher level Equation may simultaneously, as in quantum leaps, resonate to affect all entangled or linked derivatives --- many of which, in their equations, may lack switches, capacities, or degrees of freedom for storing or delaying responsive choices.
Even Equations for Perspectives of Potential that may otherwise interpret their “physical representations of stored information” as being separated by a considerable distance in space or in space-time may experience entanglements conducive to instantaneous or simultaneous resonance in certain changes.
For example, it may not be the “same photon particle" that appears to speed across an apparently long and connected path in space-time. Rather, the perception of such photon moving about across great expanses of space may be artifactual of switched resonances among sympathetically (empathetically?) aligned or entangled equations for units of potential.
Problems:
1) May some sort of plank or quantum unit for each of such four dimensions as defines our physics be measurably and directly related to the Algorithm that constrains our universe?
2) Is there a “smallest” mathematical value for relating among and to Space, or Time, or Mass, or Energy?
3) May such value somehow relate to various of “absolute” mathematical values we seem to have found, such as with regard to amenability of photons to gravity, charge of electrons, resistence of combinations of quarks to being split, or density of nuclear plasma?
4) May we “split” the appearance of even such “absolute” values, so long as the effect is “virtually” made up for by somehow re-averaging to unity?
Even if our meta potentials are expressed in respect of an apparent physics that obeys a calculus for “Discrete” quantum leaps and integer integrals, may appearances of wavelike “Continuosity” in space, time, and physical experience be merely artifactual in respect of a “higher math” for our meta-potentials? May our here-and-now rationalizing be in respect of some sort of higher calculus of continuity? Is all of Being derivative of a Mathematician (God?) of unique capacities for playing with Math?
RELATING META-POTENTIAL TO PHYSICAL-POTENTIAL:
Consider that Potential (God?) which cannot be measured in itself, but only in its relational expressions. Perhaps every unit, perspective, and combination of perspectives of that Potential is a sort of “holon” (“whole-part”), sharing constraint of its Identity to an Equation, which respects values for holding or representing: Consciousness, Relational capacity (Empathy?), and Shared directional orientation (Entropy?) for expanding exressions of a shared system of Space, Time, Matter, and Energy … as a set of units constrained to varying integer proportions. Perhaps every unit and perspective of that Potential shares and obeys the same mathematical limitations and relations.
Consider as if there are four main “dimensions,” of which all other dimensions are derivative. Consider the four main dimensions as Space (S), Time (T), Matter (M), and Energy (E). Consider that for some purposes such dimensions may be reducible to two, i.e., Space-Time (S-T) and Matter-Energy (M-E), each implicating the other. Consider that such relations among said dimensions as may be expressed to conscious experience or in measurably recordable information may also be as follows:
if there IS: 1s, 1T, AND 1M, THEN THERE MUST BE “W” E; AND
if there IS: 1E, 1T, AND 1M, THEN THERE MUST BE “X” S; AND
if there IS: 1E, is, AND 1T, THEN THERE MUST BE “Y” M; AND
if there IS: 1E, is, AND 1M, THEN THERE MUST BE “Z” T.
In other words, an Algorithm for prescribing mathematical relations among such four main dimensions need not posit a direct, one-on-one correllation between and among each of the four, so long as there is a higher level Pattern that controls their inter and intra expression.
Further, the Algorithm may facilitate Potential’s (God’s?) simultaneous ruling (or igniting) of any number of derivative potentials or sub-equations, so that each change in each higher level Equation may simultaneously, as in quantum leaps, resonate to affect all entangled or linked derivatives --- many of which, in their equations, may lack switches, capacities, or degrees of freedom for storing or delaying responsive choices.
Even Equations for Perspectives of Potential that may otherwise interpret their “physical representations of stored information” as being separated by a considerable distance in space or in space-time may experience entanglements conducive to instantaneous or simultaneous resonance in certain changes.
For example, it may not be the “same photon particle" that appears to speed across an apparently long and connected path in space-time. Rather, the perception of such photon moving about across great expanses of space may be artifactual of switched resonances among sympathetically (empathetically?) aligned or entangled equations for units of potential.
Problems:
1) May some sort of plank or quantum unit for each of such four dimensions as defines our physics be measurably and directly related to the Algorithm that constrains our universe?
2) Is there a “smallest” mathematical value for relating among and to Space, or Time, or Mass, or Energy?
3) May such value somehow relate to various of “absolute” mathematical values we seem to have found, such as with regard to amenability of photons to gravity, charge of electrons, resistence of combinations of quarks to being split, or density of nuclear plasma?
4) May we “split” the appearance of even such “absolute” values, so long as the effect is “virtually” made up for by somehow re-averaging to unity?
Even if our meta potentials are expressed in respect of an apparent physics that obeys a calculus for “Discrete” quantum leaps and integer integrals, may appearances of wavelike “Continuosity” in space, time, and physical experience be merely artifactual in respect of a “higher math” for our meta-potentials? May our here-and-now rationalizing be in respect of some sort of higher calculus of continuity? Is all of Being derivative of a Mathematician (God?) of unique capacities for playing with Math?
METAPHYSICS OF KARMA
METAPHYSICS OF KARMA:
“Spooky action at a distance” may be perceived or measured in respect that each perception of action is entangled (or polarized) with a mirror side of a same shared Equation (or derivative of a controlling Algorithm). So long as thus entangled, no one “thing” can change in manifestation of appearance for its side of the equation except in mathematical simultaniety with its polarized counterpart of the other.
Each change that is manifested in how each unit of Potential expresses itself occurs in balanced, integral, quantum leaps. There is no physical expression of time or chronology “during” a quantum leap.
An Algorithm that constrains parameters for our entire physical expresson of “universe” may, in some respects, operate in respect of one granular series of quantum leaps. So long as that Algorithm exists, it may, in some physical respect, operate as “ground” for storing and preserving some sort of condensed sum of all information about a chronology of meta-choices, perhaps subject to evaluation by God as a holism.
Each unit “thinks” to “choose,” but only expresses the result of its thinking in quantum leaps, always balanced in relations among equations and their dependent derivatives and modes of simultaneous expression.
Any “gap” between quantum leaps may entail “meta-processing” of meta feedback between perspectives of the Potential, as in feedback between the perspective of the whole versus the fluxing condensate or sum of the perspectives of the parts.
Each choice occurs at a meta-level, then is expressed in Math, and then is translated and interpreted to the Physics of mortal perspectives of consciousness. In mortal “physics,” rationalization follows each choice: To rationalize the choice itself, and to live with and evaluate its consequences.
One’s physical form represents a “Placeholding Record” for the here and now, for preserving information about the life-path chronological-sequence of an interplay of choices being played out, in which one’s meta-perspective (Soul?) is a participant. In other words, the “Dualism” of (1) spirituality and (2) physicality is in respect that the appearance of physicality is artifactual of the preservaton of sequential information, since the original creation that we refer to as the “Big Bang” of our universe. Such Dualism represents a “fuzzy condensation” (or all cards to be face up on the playing table) for the reference of each meta-perspective that plays among all others that share our universe.
Our physical Brains (and cells) are placeholders that are shaped to record rationalizations that follow the (spiritually reasoned?) choices of our Minds. In changing the shapes of our “physics,” our spiritual-minds preserve information in order to “keep karmic score” for each succeeeding choice.
In “physics,” the karmic score is kept for various synchronizing, fluxing levels and overlays of perspectives of wholes and parts, the combining and interacting potentials of which continue to define the path of experience for each perspective. One’s physical brain correllates with the store of one’s information, as “ground” for inclining or prejudicing directions for one’s future of meta-choices.
Each Brain absorbs, records, or represents a Feedback result of each choice, “as if” each such choice were purely its own, as if each brain had its own separate Identity, which it identifies with the record of its physical manifestations.
Each particular perspective senses a complex interplay with other perspectives, yet lacks comprehension of the same detail of inclinations and purposes of each such other perspective. Each particular perspective may also Intuit possibilities of interplay with other perspectives that may be beyond its mathematical or precise correllaton or prediction.
“Spooky action at a distance” may be perceived or measured in respect that each perception of action is entangled (or polarized) with a mirror side of a same shared Equation (or derivative of a controlling Algorithm). So long as thus entangled, no one “thing” can change in manifestation of appearance for its side of the equation except in mathematical simultaniety with its polarized counterpart of the other.
Each change that is manifested in how each unit of Potential expresses itself occurs in balanced, integral, quantum leaps. There is no physical expression of time or chronology “during” a quantum leap.
An Algorithm that constrains parameters for our entire physical expresson of “universe” may, in some respects, operate in respect of one granular series of quantum leaps. So long as that Algorithm exists, it may, in some physical respect, operate as “ground” for storing and preserving some sort of condensed sum of all information about a chronology of meta-choices, perhaps subject to evaluation by God as a holism.
Each unit “thinks” to “choose,” but only expresses the result of its thinking in quantum leaps, always balanced in relations among equations and their dependent derivatives and modes of simultaneous expression.
Any “gap” between quantum leaps may entail “meta-processing” of meta feedback between perspectives of the Potential, as in feedback between the perspective of the whole versus the fluxing condensate or sum of the perspectives of the parts.
Each choice occurs at a meta-level, then is expressed in Math, and then is translated and interpreted to the Physics of mortal perspectives of consciousness. In mortal “physics,” rationalization follows each choice: To rationalize the choice itself, and to live with and evaluate its consequences.
One’s physical form represents a “Placeholding Record” for the here and now, for preserving information about the life-path chronological-sequence of an interplay of choices being played out, in which one’s meta-perspective (Soul?) is a participant. In other words, the “Dualism” of (1) spirituality and (2) physicality is in respect that the appearance of physicality is artifactual of the preservaton of sequential information, since the original creation that we refer to as the “Big Bang” of our universe. Such Dualism represents a “fuzzy condensation” (or all cards to be face up on the playing table) for the reference of each meta-perspective that plays among all others that share our universe.
Our physical Brains (and cells) are placeholders that are shaped to record rationalizations that follow the (spiritually reasoned?) choices of our Minds. In changing the shapes of our “physics,” our spiritual-minds preserve information in order to “keep karmic score” for each succeeeding choice.
In “physics,” the karmic score is kept for various synchronizing, fluxing levels and overlays of perspectives of wholes and parts, the combining and interacting potentials of which continue to define the path of experience for each perspective. One’s physical brain correllates with the store of one’s information, as “ground” for inclining or prejudicing directions for one’s future of meta-choices.
Each Brain absorbs, records, or represents a Feedback result of each choice, “as if” each such choice were purely its own, as if each brain had its own separate Identity, which it identifies with the record of its physical manifestations.
Each particular perspective senses a complex interplay with other perspectives, yet lacks comprehension of the same detail of inclinations and purposes of each such other perspective. Each particular perspective may also Intuit possibilities of interplay with other perspectives that may be beyond its mathematical or precise correllaton or prediction.
Saturday, August 8, 2009
Thug Chutzpah
(cta)
Thug Chutzpah:
As I begin another dreary day reading about the same thug-chutzpah that passes for representation in D.C., I find myself struck by the myriad of shameless shenanigans that are fronted as “objective reasoning,” or “science.” This is not a matter of parallel universes of conceptualization. It is a matter of ungodly fidelity to no higher purpose than each participant’s pursuit of pleasure and power. In such pursuit, the useful idiots are only the ideologues.
But Obama and his henchmen are far too worldly to be mere ideologues. Rather, they are well versed in what they take to be cynical truths: (1) that political thuggery is a game of skill, with plays proven to be effective for every situation; (2) that, with smoothly confident deployment of force and doublespeak, it is possible to fool some of the people all of the time; (3) that --- when a group of thugs can reduce an electoral majority to a perpetual state of ignorance, confusion, entitlement-envy, and practiced rationalization --- the producing class can be cowed and corralled into a permanent feed lot.
Heed the doublespeak of the Thugs Of Chutzpah:
1) Conservatives who want to know about the upbringing, family life, early conditioning, and education of their President should be ridiculed as “birthers,” because they have no further right to know. They should just get out of the way and let the Thugs “clean up.”
2) As taught in “elite” American colleges (see Horowitz’s “One Party Classroom”), the only objective, scientifically valid, higher purpose is to overcome the historical hegemony of the blue eyed, male, white devils. (You want CHUTZPAH? Read One Party Classroom to take a gander at what the “scientific” left takes as passing for political and social SCIENCE!)
3) Conservatives who conceive that their consciousness implicates a higher power and purpose are non-bright haters of science, led astray by the Discovery Institute.
Well, why does such ridicule work for Thugs Of Chutzpah?
I think ridicule works better for Thugs because their easily riled followers and troops consist of: persons reduced by their educations to fools; persons made corrupt in believing in no purpose higher than pleasure and power; persons of desperation who are easily corrupted by cheap financial favors and promises; and persons who are simply too ignorant and cosseted among fellow travelers ever to reach beyond the kool-aid of the Thugs.
There is much tragedy in this farce.
First, the Thugs Of Chutzpah, being unable and unwilling to feed themselves, will themselves fall off the carapace of the cowed producers, once the cowed producers stop producing and laze in the ranks of the entitlement-mongering, non-producing masses.
Second, the knowledge base of civilization will falter or fail, as “science” becomes twisted more and more to the “one party classroom.”
Unfortunately, the producing class only now is realizing that it looks to its present “representation” in Congress in vain. Rather, Congress is filled with the likes of those who idealize no higher purpose than their own pleasure and power. Their fidelity is to the KUSD hierarchy: kiss up and s*** down.
Among American Jews who idolize Obama, is it because they admire his chutzpah?
Bottom line: Ordinary Americans who idealize patriotism, principle, and purpose are only now learning that they are without representation in D.C. At long last, will their anger be heard, felt, and resolved? Pray it is so.
Thug Chutzpah:
As I begin another dreary day reading about the same thug-chutzpah that passes for representation in D.C., I find myself struck by the myriad of shameless shenanigans that are fronted as “objective reasoning,” or “science.” This is not a matter of parallel universes of conceptualization. It is a matter of ungodly fidelity to no higher purpose than each participant’s pursuit of pleasure and power. In such pursuit, the useful idiots are only the ideologues.
But Obama and his henchmen are far too worldly to be mere ideologues. Rather, they are well versed in what they take to be cynical truths: (1) that political thuggery is a game of skill, with plays proven to be effective for every situation; (2) that, with smoothly confident deployment of force and doublespeak, it is possible to fool some of the people all of the time; (3) that --- when a group of thugs can reduce an electoral majority to a perpetual state of ignorance, confusion, entitlement-envy, and practiced rationalization --- the producing class can be cowed and corralled into a permanent feed lot.
Heed the doublespeak of the Thugs Of Chutzpah:
1) Conservatives who want to know about the upbringing, family life, early conditioning, and education of their President should be ridiculed as “birthers,” because they have no further right to know. They should just get out of the way and let the Thugs “clean up.”
2) As taught in “elite” American colleges (see Horowitz’s “One Party Classroom”), the only objective, scientifically valid, higher purpose is to overcome the historical hegemony of the blue eyed, male, white devils. (You want CHUTZPAH? Read One Party Classroom to take a gander at what the “scientific” left takes as passing for political and social SCIENCE!)
3) Conservatives who conceive that their consciousness implicates a higher power and purpose are non-bright haters of science, led astray by the Discovery Institute.
Well, why does such ridicule work for Thugs Of Chutzpah?
I think ridicule works better for Thugs because their easily riled followers and troops consist of: persons reduced by their educations to fools; persons made corrupt in believing in no purpose higher than pleasure and power; persons of desperation who are easily corrupted by cheap financial favors and promises; and persons who are simply too ignorant and cosseted among fellow travelers ever to reach beyond the kool-aid of the Thugs.
There is much tragedy in this farce.
First, the Thugs Of Chutzpah, being unable and unwilling to feed themselves, will themselves fall off the carapace of the cowed producers, once the cowed producers stop producing and laze in the ranks of the entitlement-mongering, non-producing masses.
Second, the knowledge base of civilization will falter or fail, as “science” becomes twisted more and more to the “one party classroom.”
Unfortunately, the producing class only now is realizing that it looks to its present “representation” in Congress in vain. Rather, Congress is filled with the likes of those who idealize no higher purpose than their own pleasure and power. Their fidelity is to the KUSD hierarchy: kiss up and s*** down.
Among American Jews who idolize Obama, is it because they admire his chutzpah?
Bottom line: Ordinary Americans who idealize patriotism, principle, and purpose are only now learning that they are without representation in D.C. At long last, will their anger be heard, felt, and resolved? Pray it is so.
Sunday, July 19, 2009
FALSE ELITES AND CLEANSING FIRES
(cta)
FALSE ELITES AND CLEANSING FIRES:
Peggy Noonan is as false in her pretense for having elite wisdom as is Bill Ayers. Like Ayers, she endorsed Obama.
Prophets often warned against false prophets. They should also have warned against False Elites.
Environmentalists appreciate the need for natural forest fires, to clean out deadwood and underbrush. Capacity for a successful society to shade moral ignorance and failure may not be altogether unlike capacity for a forest to shade deadwood. Perhaps a periodic prairie fire is as necessary to burn off moral deadwood of false elites (of those-who-just-don’t-get a civilizing-morality-for-preserving-human-liberty) as it is to burn off forest deadwood.
In any event, such a prairie fire would hardly establish the kind of utopian socialism Bill Ayers imagines.
Ayers can write audaciously and well for inspiring figurative prairie fires. Compare http://www.zombietime.com/prairie_fire/; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_Underground_Organization: “...the rhetorical flavor of Weatherman on the attack—combative, uncompromising, confident, and outrageously arrogant.” (Sounds like Obama, yes?)
However, ability to write well is hardly evidence that one is elite in the wisdom of experience. See: Peggy Noonan, viz http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/07/peggy_noonan_sarah_palin_jealo.html.
See also July 8, 2009, What Is Wisdom? Sarah Palin and Her Critics, by Victor Davis Hanson, Pajamas Media.
Must our moral development require that we endure a cleansing moral fire? Or may those of wise vision show us an alternative way?
Meantime, does not the very air of “elite” Ivy’s remain steeped in Ayers’ philosophy?
BTW:
“Ayers was not simply protesting "against" the Vietnam War. Firstly, he wasn't against war in principle, he was agitating for the victory of the communist forces in Vietnam. In other words: He wasn't against the war, he was against our side in the war.” http://www.zombietime.com/prairie_fire/. (Sounds like Obama, yes?)
“…dedicated the book to Robert F. Kennedy's killer Sirhan Sirhan.”
****
Pause to enjoy some grins, at:
The Wood Spider: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHzdsFiBbFc;
The Good, the bad, and the Ugly: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3gp7B8WC4Q&feature=related.
FALSE ELITES AND CLEANSING FIRES:
Peggy Noonan is as false in her pretense for having elite wisdom as is Bill Ayers. Like Ayers, she endorsed Obama.
Prophets often warned against false prophets. They should also have warned against False Elites.
Environmentalists appreciate the need for natural forest fires, to clean out deadwood and underbrush. Capacity for a successful society to shade moral ignorance and failure may not be altogether unlike capacity for a forest to shade deadwood. Perhaps a periodic prairie fire is as necessary to burn off moral deadwood of false elites (of those-who-just-don’t-get a civilizing-morality-for-preserving-human-liberty) as it is to burn off forest deadwood.
In any event, such a prairie fire would hardly establish the kind of utopian socialism Bill Ayers imagines.
Ayers can write audaciously and well for inspiring figurative prairie fires. Compare http://www.zombietime.com/prairie_fire/; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_Underground_Organization: “...the rhetorical flavor of Weatherman on the attack—combative, uncompromising, confident, and outrageously arrogant.” (Sounds like Obama, yes?)
However, ability to write well is hardly evidence that one is elite in the wisdom of experience. See: Peggy Noonan, viz http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/07/peggy_noonan_sarah_palin_jealo.html.
See also July 8, 2009, What Is Wisdom? Sarah Palin and Her Critics, by Victor Davis Hanson, Pajamas Media.
Must our moral development require that we endure a cleansing moral fire? Or may those of wise vision show us an alternative way?
Meantime, does not the very air of “elite” Ivy’s remain steeped in Ayers’ philosophy?
BTW:
“Ayers was not simply protesting "against" the Vietnam War. Firstly, he wasn't against war in principle, he was agitating for the victory of the communist forces in Vietnam. In other words: He wasn't against the war, he was against our side in the war.” http://www.zombietime.com/prairie_fire/. (Sounds like Obama, yes?)
“…dedicated the book to Robert F. Kennedy's killer Sirhan Sirhan.”
****
Pause to enjoy some grins, at:
The Wood Spider: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHzdsFiBbFc;
The Good, the bad, and the Ugly: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3gp7B8WC4Q&feature=related.
Saturday, July 11, 2009
EVOLUTION OF DREAMS
(click title above)
EVOLUTION OF DREAMS:
How do dreams evolve? Do they evolve:
1) From RANDOM electrical flickers across synapses?
2) From NATURAL SELECTION among those patterns of synapse firings that just happen to be most fit to their sustaining niche for surviving to replicate?
3) From loops of feedback to the dreaming CONSCIOUSNESS --- of meaning, interpretation, observation, and choice of perspective?
4) From all of the above?
5) And: From intuitive interaction with a higher, synchronizing, system-wide, choice-effecting, mathematically leveraged, immeasurable Source of Consciousness, aka, the “Potential” (or “God”) of our universe?
For any student of logic who believes a rational explanation applies to our governance, who has ruled out many competing suitors, so that only one explanatory model seems to remain, which does not yet appear to deserve being ruled out, it would seem reasonable to believe that the remaining “theory” (even if testable or “evidenced” only in math, and not in empiricism) is increasingly likely to be valid.
Parameters for our choices seem to be ruled by an ascending array of changing, interacting, mathematical functions, each being obedient to a grand function, somehow put in place to govern our universe, i.e., “The Algorithm.”
GOD OF THE GAPS:
Excepting the grand Algorithm, all other mathematical functions may be within our power, as perspectives of consciousness, to manipulate and change. If so, science does not avail us with power to “close the gaps” in order to “choke out the god of the gaps” --- because there is no such a god. Rather, so long as we live and wish to retain our powers of particular perspectives, the grand Algorithm remains beyond our power to change. Scientific empiricism avails us with means for leveraging our adducements of the power of perspectives of consciousness, but not with power to leverage Consciousness as the Source of holism.
It seems that rational beings may leverage math to construct into “physical” manifestation particular results that seem infinitely improbable or miraculous, even though every step along the course to change or achieve each such result would have obeyed and been consistent with the rules of The Algorithm, which governs our shared set (or Universe).
Such “power to alter gaps” seems to consist in a finite-yet-unbounded potential power (and responsibility) of the consciousness that permeates and defines each of us. In other words, we do not “choke out god by closing gaps,” because we ourselves are imbued with power to alter and redirect all said gaps --- save one: The ultimate Algorithm. Such may be the finite yet unbounded explanatory limit that governs each of us, as an incomplete, particular, mere perspective of a higher, holistic Consciousness.
God seeks to leverage appreciation of experiences, through mathematically relating perspectives (us), which likewise leverage their inter-appreciation towards mathematical capacities for intuiting receptivity to guidance from God. We “progress” in appreciating God’s involvement by applying math to pierce all of our experience, coming eventually to appreciate the steady drumbeat of evidence of the fundamental interrelation of math with our own potentials of consciousness.
Given the infinite potential of our consciousness to leverage math, it seems a sin for any perspective of consciousness to endeavor, by leveraging government, to impose stifling and invasive dictates in the name of pursuing “equality” among perspectives.
EVOLUTION OF DREAMS:
How do dreams evolve? Do they evolve:
1) From RANDOM electrical flickers across synapses?
2) From NATURAL SELECTION among those patterns of synapse firings that just happen to be most fit to their sustaining niche for surviving to replicate?
3) From loops of feedback to the dreaming CONSCIOUSNESS --- of meaning, interpretation, observation, and choice of perspective?
4) From all of the above?
5) And: From intuitive interaction with a higher, synchronizing, system-wide, choice-effecting, mathematically leveraged, immeasurable Source of Consciousness, aka, the “Potential” (or “God”) of our universe?
For any student of logic who believes a rational explanation applies to our governance, who has ruled out many competing suitors, so that only one explanatory model seems to remain, which does not yet appear to deserve being ruled out, it would seem reasonable to believe that the remaining “theory” (even if testable or “evidenced” only in math, and not in empiricism) is increasingly likely to be valid.
Parameters for our choices seem to be ruled by an ascending array of changing, interacting, mathematical functions, each being obedient to a grand function, somehow put in place to govern our universe, i.e., “The Algorithm.”
GOD OF THE GAPS:
Excepting the grand Algorithm, all other mathematical functions may be within our power, as perspectives of consciousness, to manipulate and change. If so, science does not avail us with power to “close the gaps” in order to “choke out the god of the gaps” --- because there is no such a god. Rather, so long as we live and wish to retain our powers of particular perspectives, the grand Algorithm remains beyond our power to change. Scientific empiricism avails us with means for leveraging our adducements of the power of perspectives of consciousness, but not with power to leverage Consciousness as the Source of holism.
It seems that rational beings may leverage math to construct into “physical” manifestation particular results that seem infinitely improbable or miraculous, even though every step along the course to change or achieve each such result would have obeyed and been consistent with the rules of The Algorithm, which governs our shared set (or Universe).
Such “power to alter gaps” seems to consist in a finite-yet-unbounded potential power (and responsibility) of the consciousness that permeates and defines each of us. In other words, we do not “choke out god by closing gaps,” because we ourselves are imbued with power to alter and redirect all said gaps --- save one: The ultimate Algorithm. Such may be the finite yet unbounded explanatory limit that governs each of us, as an incomplete, particular, mere perspective of a higher, holistic Consciousness.
God seeks to leverage appreciation of experiences, through mathematically relating perspectives (us), which likewise leverage their inter-appreciation towards mathematical capacities for intuiting receptivity to guidance from God. We “progress” in appreciating God’s involvement by applying math to pierce all of our experience, coming eventually to appreciate the steady drumbeat of evidence of the fundamental interrelation of math with our own potentials of consciousness.
Given the infinite potential of our consciousness to leverage math, it seems a sin for any perspective of consciousness to endeavor, by leveraging government, to impose stifling and invasive dictates in the name of pursuing “equality” among perspectives.
Friday, May 22, 2009
Anti-Progressivism
Anti-Progressivism
(click title above)
A recent AT article defines terminology for describing how we are being swamped and ripped by a social, political, and economic tsumani. The article does not seem to have been meant to propose alternative suggestions. Without an alternative plan, merely to advocate for "just say no" does not work. Regardless of terminology, all of this odious central planning that is swamping us seems to be channeling from two related and parallel currents: (1) Controllers are becoming more powerful, with more powerful tools for telescoping power; (2) and sheep are being multiplyied far faster than thinkers.
Reason 1 relates to Controlling Progressives ("C-Rinos and C-Dinos"), while Reason 2 relates to Sheep Progressives ("S-Rinos and S-Dinos"). Such C and S Progressives are made for each other, but there is no substantive place in their politics for Conservators of Decent Civilization. Simply put, Progressives are hell bent towards a N.W.O. that will genuflect to pretended attempts at Conservation of the planet, while crushing all attempts at Conservation of civilizing freedom and dignity.
An alternative society would be one that accomodates respect for each responsible person's freedom and dignity. But hope for any such alternative is sinking fast. Our situation is comparable to that of early 1900's Galveston, when a mighty hurricane swamped its seawall. Now, globalism is the new tsumani for swamping ALL islands of freedom and dignity. Broken b0rders, broken education, whore media, advances in advertising and mind control, advances in communicaton and behavioral monitoring, concentrations in corporate power (hard to compete against Walmart), undermining of respect for customs and traditonal authorities, replacing of God or Higher Consciousness with "Scientific-State" --- these are the handmaidens for the the new world order.
No workable alternative is presented just by saying no to all such handmaidens. Because these are powerful handmaidens. Among decent people, those who want to preserve islands of civilizing freedom and dignity had best get an alternative act together --- soon.
In speaking of Conservatives, I am reminded of Howard Beale: You've got to say, I'm a human being! G-dda***t!
We need to turn back the spigot by which we are being flooded with sheep. Newsflash: It is immoral, not moral, to allow the voting franchise to be so universally extended as to allow easily manipulable herds to be recruited by crass controllers in order to swamp responsible society. To fail to resist such human tsumani is to surrender hope of decent human civilization.
I have been away on business, but I saw a call from AT for support. Well, we need to support voices like AT. We need to get our conservative act ORGANIZED and appreciate which aspects of N.W.O are worthwhile vs. which are handmaidens to Evil. We need to educate those sheep who can be educated, and stop allowing our voices and votes to be drowned out under a flood of newly enfranchised S-Progressives being farmed by C-Progressives.
(click title above)
A recent AT article defines terminology for describing how we are being swamped and ripped by a social, political, and economic tsumani. The article does not seem to have been meant to propose alternative suggestions. Without an alternative plan, merely to advocate for "just say no" does not work. Regardless of terminology, all of this odious central planning that is swamping us seems to be channeling from two related and parallel currents: (1) Controllers are becoming more powerful, with more powerful tools for telescoping power; (2) and sheep are being multiplyied far faster than thinkers.
Reason 1 relates to Controlling Progressives ("C-Rinos and C-Dinos"), while Reason 2 relates to Sheep Progressives ("S-Rinos and S-Dinos"). Such C and S Progressives are made for each other, but there is no substantive place in their politics for Conservators of Decent Civilization. Simply put, Progressives are hell bent towards a N.W.O. that will genuflect to pretended attempts at Conservation of the planet, while crushing all attempts at Conservation of civilizing freedom and dignity.
An alternative society would be one that accomodates respect for each responsible person's freedom and dignity. But hope for any such alternative is sinking fast. Our situation is comparable to that of early 1900's Galveston, when a mighty hurricane swamped its seawall. Now, globalism is the new tsumani for swamping ALL islands of freedom and dignity. Broken b0rders, broken education, whore media, advances in advertising and mind control, advances in communicaton and behavioral monitoring, concentrations in corporate power (hard to compete against Walmart), undermining of respect for customs and traditonal authorities, replacing of God or Higher Consciousness with "Scientific-State" --- these are the handmaidens for the the new world order.
No workable alternative is presented just by saying no to all such handmaidens. Because these are powerful handmaidens. Among decent people, those who want to preserve islands of civilizing freedom and dignity had best get an alternative act together --- soon.
In speaking of Conservatives, I am reminded of Howard Beale: You've got to say, I'm a human being! G-dda***t!
We need to turn back the spigot by which we are being flooded with sheep. Newsflash: It is immoral, not moral, to allow the voting franchise to be so universally extended as to allow easily manipulable herds to be recruited by crass controllers in order to swamp responsible society. To fail to resist such human tsumani is to surrender hope of decent human civilization.
I have been away on business, but I saw a call from AT for support. Well, we need to support voices like AT. We need to get our conservative act ORGANIZED and appreciate which aspects of N.W.O are worthwhile vs. which are handmaidens to Evil. We need to educate those sheep who can be educated, and stop allowing our voices and votes to be drowned out under a flood of newly enfranchised S-Progressives being farmed by C-Progressives.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
