(click title above)
Random Ranger:
GOD VS. RANDOMNESS:
PERSPECTIVES OF FREEDOM WITHIN PARAMETERS:
GOD: In my conception, God is nothing that can be measured, but everything that can be intuited as persisting beyond objective measurement or recordation.
CHANGE: Insofar as change may have an aspect for being the only constant that is not “true” merely by tautology or by system of self-referential definition, “God” is who appreciates such change when considered in its entirety.
SUBJECTIVE FORESIGHT: Until a change is made or chosen, what change one should choose may entail more of evaluation that is subjective. Until a change is chosen, the decider may evaluate in respect of degrees of freedom. This is entailed in “social studies.”
OBJECTIVE HINDSIGHT: After a change has been made and consigned to the recorded past, measuring such record may entail more of evaluation that is objective. After a change has occurred, it may be evaluated in respect of historical records of randomness. This is entailed in “science.”
HINDSIGHT RANDOMNESS: Proceeding from a perspective of objective hindsight, one may extend and widen one’s frame of reference until any particular event can be fitted as having been consistent with statistical randomness or probability. Even if an event were so rare that no frame of reference within our universe could possibly fit or cloak the event as having been consistent with random probability, one could always “fix” such a discrepancy in order to discount any source of Free Will (God) simply by imagining whatever number of universes as may be necessary in order to make the event appear to be a matter of “routine,” random occurrence.
THREE CARD MONTY: Thus, scientists and statisticians have learned how to be “useful” for re-orienting our language, sort of like “Three Card Monty,” to help us “re-frame” present perceptions of miracles of God empathy into hindsight appreciations of indifferent probabilities.
REDEEMING RESOLUTION: But, should not Holistic Consciousness (God) have means and power for leveraging and delegating expressions of free-will and choice-making in respect of various auxiliary algorithms? In other words, merely because math can always, in hindsight, be fitted from some perspective or frame of reference to make an event seem to have been routine, why should such trivial capacity of math be thought to make trivial the subjective choices of perspectives of Consciousness, in foresight? “God-as-something” is involved in our present, subjective choices; “God-as-nothing” is assessed in our hindsight, objective evaluations.
CONUNDRUM OF INDIFFERENCE: Were it any other way, God would be objectively and indifferently measurable to statistical analysis. But, how could we be able indifferently to measure a Super-Meta-Being who, in relation to us, is anything but “indifferent”?
AMBIGUITY OF GOD: That God functions metaphysically and ambiguously, as we transition from past to present to future, need hardly surprise us, as we go about our practical applications of logic.
SEMANTICS OF GOD: Regardless, even the most narrowly cranked and objectively obsessed of scientists has no choice but to wrestle with choices entailing judgments about morality (“ought-ness”). He can protest with imagined “atheism” until the cows come home. But, ultimately, so long as any one participates in conscious choice-making among alternatives, such acts, on some level, must unavoidably be reasoned or rationalized in respect of some meta-moral guidepost. And such guidepost will be beyond complete, objectively-measurable justification in any “scientific” sense.
.
****
.
New insights are drawing Empirical Science and Mystical Spirituality closer together, faster than most people realize. A new empathetic awakening may yet conserve many of us from our own divisive and limited wars and class envies.
Gnosticism:
All Nature And Physics Is Math:
Nature is built on fractal matrix geometry (not unlike algorithms built on layers of algorithms)(self reflective programs to write programs to write programs …).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GaB1VMAXPQ;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHBD8pc8XMI&feature=related.
Mathematical Evolution:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfErlA2v4xg&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GaB1VMAXPQ&feature=related.
Creative Adaptive (rather than random) Selection of Consciousness; Evolution Evolving:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-Qus_xGzZg&feature=related
DNA Fractal Rippling within Symphonic Field of Consciousness:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGZYsZ3E6rA;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slrxG8-IvVI;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_Ez8edgbOA&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRN1fsFCRto.
Fractal Holography (thought perceptions are derivative appearances, not real or true being’ness in itself; science is a perceptual enterprise, not a purely objective enterprise; thinking is a projection of illusory appearance, or perspective):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIQYB9I4hDE&feature=related
The Measurement Problem (no electron has independent, “either-or” existence); real effects of conceptual pigeonholes; Source of Illusions; Limited Finite perspective of reality trying to observe and conceptualize the Infinite reality; to create your own reality tunnel is not to create reality in itself; we imagine ourselves:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dpRPTwsKJs&feature=related
We are infinite consciousness trapped while we are living, within a holographic illusion; this world we think is a physical reality is just a mathematically holographic illusion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgeTPubpE8s&feature=related
Morphic Fields and Habits of Nature:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1xj61rMx48;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yl7f6ogV9o8&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoNUpWwpMdE&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQDg8H0gf7E&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLvIdhGSIYE&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf_tSS4v-y8&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXt1sYS4c0o&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ckU14NMFTU&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdkPhcD_I08&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ea6azRvIpLo&feature=related.
Self Organizing Morphic Fields, Morphic Resonance Memory:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBYvhiobtCM&feature=related
NOTE:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/02/predictions_of_hope_and_change.html:
Put aside class wars for a minute.
May not one still reasonably hope that new insights are drawing Empirical Science and Mystical Spirituality closer together, faster than most people realize?
Mainstream quantum physics and membrane biology are becoming as “weird” as oft denigrated New Age and Post Modern Philosophy.
A new sort of AWAKENING, arising from a new and empathetic appreciation or coalition among scientists and spiritualists, may yet conserve many of us from our own divisive and limited wars and class envies.
In that regard, some suggest each one of us must be the change he or she wants to be. (Obama: “We are the change we have been waiting for.”)
But I think more.
I think each of us can, and needs to, envision a world view, whereby a civilization that is friendly to creative expressions of change can be checked, balanced, and preserved within manageable parameters for availing freedom of expression.
In other words, it is NOT ENOUGH that we become child-like citizens, able to live within a LIBERAL civilization that is protected by others.
Rather, we must also become adult citizens, able to draw and enforce the lines and definitions needed to CONSERVE and sustain such a civilization.
It is in moral fiber for doing this hard, adult work that I find Democratic Liberals and Republican Bluebloods so often lacking (or “adolescent”). It is they who must be purged from Congress.
And a rising coalition among scientists and spiritualists of common good will may yet unite and inspire adult Conservatives to that cause.
*****
Ontology of Consciousness (Field of Consciousness):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6Ew1wepKn8&feature=related
****
Randomness:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGaUEAkqhMY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEDYr_fgcP8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aW2GkDkimkE&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAHUFWPgwpc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXz3qu6J6Zg&feature=related
Aside: I do not think cells “have” will. Rather, I think will is indivisible yet finds expressions through perspectives, emerging as acts for manifesting cellular actions (i.e., interactions of matter and energy). In other words, cells do not “have” will; rather will “has” cells. Compare: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ke22OSU0Ztk.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ja0UUKbVlhA&feature=related
****
Evolution:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7gZhksK9Sw&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFPeQW5XLcc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoJbri9Yem0&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wrs3FDiyot4&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JS5TlcRMaFU&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvwhIG2DZyI&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVthBu6zCY0&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2HpiMyDW-g&feature=related
Music:
George Harrison:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3k5Hpa4NVKI&feature=related
Random Ranger:
GOD VS. RANDOMNESS:
PERSPECTIVES OF FREEDOM WITHIN PARAMETERS:
GOD: In my conception, God is nothing that can be measured, but everything that can be intuited as persisting beyond objective measurement or recordation.
CHANGE: Insofar as change may have an aspect for being the only constant that is not “true” merely by tautology or by system of self-referential definition, “God” is who appreciates such change when considered in its entirety.
SUBJECTIVE FORESIGHT: Until a change is made or chosen, what change one should choose may entail more of evaluation that is subjective. Until a change is chosen, the decider may evaluate in respect of degrees of freedom. This is entailed in “social studies.”
OBJECTIVE HINDSIGHT: After a change has been made and consigned to the recorded past, measuring such record may entail more of evaluation that is objective. After a change has occurred, it may be evaluated in respect of historical records of randomness. This is entailed in “science.”
HINDSIGHT RANDOMNESS: Proceeding from a perspective of objective hindsight, one may extend and widen one’s frame of reference until any particular event can be fitted as having been consistent with statistical randomness or probability. Even if an event were so rare that no frame of reference within our universe could possibly fit or cloak the event as having been consistent with random probability, one could always “fix” such a discrepancy in order to discount any source of Free Will (God) simply by imagining whatever number of universes as may be necessary in order to make the event appear to be a matter of “routine,” random occurrence.
THREE CARD MONTY: Thus, scientists and statisticians have learned how to be “useful” for re-orienting our language, sort of like “Three Card Monty,” to help us “re-frame” present perceptions of miracles of God empathy into hindsight appreciations of indifferent probabilities.
REDEEMING RESOLUTION: But, should not Holistic Consciousness (God) have means and power for leveraging and delegating expressions of free-will and choice-making in respect of various auxiliary algorithms? In other words, merely because math can always, in hindsight, be fitted from some perspective or frame of reference to make an event seem to have been routine, why should such trivial capacity of math be thought to make trivial the subjective choices of perspectives of Consciousness, in foresight? “God-as-something” is involved in our present, subjective choices; “God-as-nothing” is assessed in our hindsight, objective evaluations.
CONUNDRUM OF INDIFFERENCE: Were it any other way, God would be objectively and indifferently measurable to statistical analysis. But, how could we be able indifferently to measure a Super-Meta-Being who, in relation to us, is anything but “indifferent”?
AMBIGUITY OF GOD: That God functions metaphysically and ambiguously, as we transition from past to present to future, need hardly surprise us, as we go about our practical applications of logic.
SEMANTICS OF GOD: Regardless, even the most narrowly cranked and objectively obsessed of scientists has no choice but to wrestle with choices entailing judgments about morality (“ought-ness”). He can protest with imagined “atheism” until the cows come home. But, ultimately, so long as any one participates in conscious choice-making among alternatives, such acts, on some level, must unavoidably be reasoned or rationalized in respect of some meta-moral guidepost. And such guidepost will be beyond complete, objectively-measurable justification in any “scientific” sense.
.
****
.
New insights are drawing Empirical Science and Mystical Spirituality closer together, faster than most people realize. A new empathetic awakening may yet conserve many of us from our own divisive and limited wars and class envies.
Gnosticism:
All Nature And Physics Is Math:
Nature is built on fractal matrix geometry (not unlike algorithms built on layers of algorithms)(self reflective programs to write programs to write programs …).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GaB1VMAXPQ;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHBD8pc8XMI&feature=related.
Mathematical Evolution:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfErlA2v4xg&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GaB1VMAXPQ&feature=related.
Creative Adaptive (rather than random) Selection of Consciousness; Evolution Evolving:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-Qus_xGzZg&feature=related
DNA Fractal Rippling within Symphonic Field of Consciousness:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGZYsZ3E6rA;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slrxG8-IvVI;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_Ez8edgbOA&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRN1fsFCRto.
Fractal Holography (thought perceptions are derivative appearances, not real or true being’ness in itself; science is a perceptual enterprise, not a purely objective enterprise; thinking is a projection of illusory appearance, or perspective):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIQYB9I4hDE&feature=related
The Measurement Problem (no electron has independent, “either-or” existence); real effects of conceptual pigeonholes; Source of Illusions; Limited Finite perspective of reality trying to observe and conceptualize the Infinite reality; to create your own reality tunnel is not to create reality in itself; we imagine ourselves:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dpRPTwsKJs&feature=related
We are infinite consciousness trapped while we are living, within a holographic illusion; this world we think is a physical reality is just a mathematically holographic illusion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgeTPubpE8s&feature=related
Morphic Fields and Habits of Nature:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1xj61rMx48;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yl7f6ogV9o8&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoNUpWwpMdE&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQDg8H0gf7E&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLvIdhGSIYE&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf_tSS4v-y8&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXt1sYS4c0o&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ckU14NMFTU&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdkPhcD_I08&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ea6azRvIpLo&feature=related.
Self Organizing Morphic Fields, Morphic Resonance Memory:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBYvhiobtCM&feature=related
NOTE:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/02/predictions_of_hope_and_change.html:
Put aside class wars for a minute.
May not one still reasonably hope that new insights are drawing Empirical Science and Mystical Spirituality closer together, faster than most people realize?
Mainstream quantum physics and membrane biology are becoming as “weird” as oft denigrated New Age and Post Modern Philosophy.
A new sort of AWAKENING, arising from a new and empathetic appreciation or coalition among scientists and spiritualists, may yet conserve many of us from our own divisive and limited wars and class envies.
In that regard, some suggest each one of us must be the change he or she wants to be. (Obama: “We are the change we have been waiting for.”)
But I think more.
I think each of us can, and needs to, envision a world view, whereby a civilization that is friendly to creative expressions of change can be checked, balanced, and preserved within manageable parameters for availing freedom of expression.
In other words, it is NOT ENOUGH that we become child-like citizens, able to live within a LIBERAL civilization that is protected by others.
Rather, we must also become adult citizens, able to draw and enforce the lines and definitions needed to CONSERVE and sustain such a civilization.
It is in moral fiber for doing this hard, adult work that I find Democratic Liberals and Republican Bluebloods so often lacking (or “adolescent”). It is they who must be purged from Congress.
And a rising coalition among scientists and spiritualists of common good will may yet unite and inspire adult Conservatives to that cause.
*****
Ontology of Consciousness (Field of Consciousness):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6Ew1wepKn8&feature=related
****
Randomness:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGaUEAkqhMY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEDYr_fgcP8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aW2GkDkimkE&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAHUFWPgwpc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXz3qu6J6Zg&feature=related
Aside: I do not think cells “have” will. Rather, I think will is indivisible yet finds expressions through perspectives, emerging as acts for manifesting cellular actions (i.e., interactions of matter and energy). In other words, cells do not “have” will; rather will “has” cells. Compare: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ke22OSU0Ztk.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ja0UUKbVlhA&feature=related
****
Evolution:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7gZhksK9Sw&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFPeQW5XLcc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoJbri9Yem0&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wrs3FDiyot4&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JS5TlcRMaFU&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvwhIG2DZyI&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVthBu6zCY0&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2HpiMyDW-g&feature=related
Music:
George Harrison:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3k5Hpa4NVKI&feature=related
1 comment:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/02/predictions_of_hope_and_change.html:
The notion of an expanding or contracting economy is an illusion. What expands, contracts, and changes are the feelings and leverages of mutual trust, good faith, and good will among mankind.
Except in smoke and mirrors, we do not create new consciousness or new energy.
We only interrelate to re-compartmentalize, re-organize, and re-direct our old inertial forms of consciousness and energy.
Our fundamental faux-material issues are:
1) To what levels of perspective and power should we apportion control over our energies;
2) What forms of energies should we harness;
3) In pursuit of what arts and purposes should we organize our energies; and
4) How shall we come in good faith to focus and agree upon such hierarchical, fluxing apportionments and organizations of control over our expressions of energy?
For resolving those issues, there is no one correct answer that can be modeled or proven in logic and math.
This is because logic and math cannot factor conscious, free-will, choice-making.
This is what Marxist Materialists and Economic Determinists ignore.
Some express intention to ignore it because, whatever their subconscious state of mind, they Choose to express non-belief in it.
Others ignore it because they do not intuit enough capacity around them to do much about it. (Good grief!)
Regardless, neither logic nor market-based models of random probability can factor free will.
But we can, in common good faith, respect and intuit free will and individual dignity.
(After, all, is not the protection and conservation of individual dignity mainly what Conservatives are about?)
Until we do find ways in good faith to respect our ever-morphing choices of consciousness, we will struggle in vain to substitute material-based logic, whose powers are only derivative and illusory.
Eventually, we will pull free of historical and market cycles and lead ourselves to hearken to inspiration in respect of a higher, unifying Source of free will.
Until then, our self-made, material-based logic retains its stubborn grip, leading our materialists to divide into opposing economic camps of class warfare.
[Mystic: Doug Keershaw --- “You fight your fight, and I’ll fight me.”]
Post a Comment