Coopt was a popular word during the 60's, when kids didn't want The Man to coopt their movement. Except that the cooption is now complete. Indeed, Obama's strategy has morphed to appeal to both callow kids and the rich elites who have completely coopted all the "news" the kids-who-can-never-grow-up are allowed to hear. The elites who plan to lead these kids no more expect to serve any youth interest than the party princelings in China expect to serve any mass interest of the people. The ignorant, iliterate, and callow are everywhere coopted! What lightened their loads in the past? Church, charity, family, friends, loyalty, nation, cultural assimilation. What promises, but lies about, lightening their loads now? Coopting crony elitist buzzards!
.
There is no viable, elite plan for serving the proletariat! When people trade their congregants, families, kinsmen, and countrymen for lying, central-power-mongering elitists, there is hell to follow: Debt enslavement, mind subjugation, rule by diversity division, and red-tape imprisonment. Every kind of centralizing elitist noblesse oblige --- feudalism, progressivism, socialism, communism, fascism --- is a crock for frauds. Indeed, the Blueblood NWO international Republican agenda for reducing and replacing government with crony corporatists --- by keeping borders open, availing pathways to citizenship for illiterate gullibles, and continuing to export American industry and sell out infrastructure --- is an elitist crock! Unions have been coopted by international elitists. Next, government itself will be made "small" by essentially cannibalizing it to international crony corporatists. After all, they have our best interests at heart, right? Who else --- except the likes of Soros, Obama, Pelosi, and Goldman Sachs --- would leave plain folks any trail of crumbs? This scenario is playing out all over the West.
.
Power to the People! Yeah, right. Translate: This way to the plantation. Has the majority of every electorate of the West really been trained (excuse me, "educated") to become so stupid? Why should lickspittle Brits be expected, when the time comes, to give Maggie a state funeral? They hardly deserve her.
.
There is no viable, elite plan for serving the proletariat! When people trade their congregants, families, kinsmen, and countrymen for lying, central-power-mongering elitists, there is hell to follow: Debt enslavement, mind subjugation, rule by diversity division, and red-tape imprisonment. Every kind of centralizing elitist noblesse oblige --- feudalism, progressivism, socialism, communism, fascism --- is a crock for frauds. Indeed, the Blueblood NWO international Republican agenda for reducing and replacing government with crony corporatists --- by keeping borders open, availing pathways to citizenship for illiterate gullibles, and continuing to export American industry and sell out infrastructure --- is an elitist crock! Unions have been coopted by international elitists. Next, government itself will be made "small" by essentially cannibalizing it to international crony corporatists. After all, they have our best interests at heart, right? Who else --- except the likes of Soros, Obama, Pelosi, and Goldman Sachs --- would leave plain folks any trail of crumbs? This scenario is playing out all over the West.
.
Power to the People! Yeah, right. Translate: This way to the plantation. Has the majority of every electorate of the West really been trained (excuse me, "educated") to become so stupid? Why should lickspittle Brits be expected, when the time comes, to give Maggie a state funeral? They hardly deserve her.
3 comments:
Libertarians would be more amusing and less dangerous were they only childlike in their ages and not in their thinking. While Jihadis wage war only against that Western science and technology which is not destructive, Libertarians wage war with reality itself. Which of the following fairyland contradictions do Libertarians not believe in? Free will does not really exist, and no one should restrict another's freedom. Government should be small, and people don't need traditions, families, churches, or nations. Children would think more clearly if they were more free to experiment with sex and drugs among all genders, ages, and persuasions. Judeo-Christian traditions are anathema to liberty, and Islam should not be stymied in replacing them. Traditional families, cultures, and nations are obsolete, and a wonderful new order would prevail if only they withered away. Bad men would become obsolete if everyone who can be trained were taught not to interfere with anyone else's freedom. Charity would blossom if everyone were taught to be more selfish. Party leaders in China and North Korea want only what is best for their people and to be left alone by the West. Were the West to fall, Libertarians would not be among the first to be wasted. Got weed?
If elite cronies are the allies with whom Obama and friends mean to overawe the ignorant and corrupt masses, Libertarians will be the mules. Obama's switch in strategy, to forego the loyalty of ordinary American workers in order to further a mind-subjugating NWO, entails not only an unholy alliance with crony cannibal capitalists and crony idiot socialists, but also with godless Libertarians --- who think liberty will rain down like manna if only government, before collapsing, will first expel all religion and mores of decency. If Obama is quick at anything, it's throwing mores of decency under the bus. It's one thing to want decentralized government. It's another to believe, against all history and logic, in decentralized national defense. Conservatives have seen Zero's cynical sacrifice of ordinary American workers. They may not yet have seen that Zero means to dissolve the weak attraction of Libertarians to Conservatives. The trivalently-to-be-aligned Dark Side (Elite Cronies, History Illiterate Socialists, and Reality Illiterate Libertarians) is plenty smart, but utterly unwise. If cheap, short-sighted bribery can convince enough Libertarians, before Conservatives can lead them to put on their decency caps, there will be four more years of ObamaRaj. If you thought you had your fill of happy-face-on-a-dogmastick-suckuping, you ain't seen nothing yet. Conservatives need to call on prodigal, ordinary Americans to come home. Call on ordinary, independent, American workers whose brains have not yet been completely co-opted by dogma spouts. Call on self reliance, liberty, protection of family, culture of mores, local governance, national defense of borders and infrastructure, and smart trade. Emphasis on protection of family, culture of mores, national defense, smart trade, and smart (decentralized) government will cost some Libertarian votes. Those votes will have to be made up for --- by bringing home ordinary American workers. The alternative is almost too awful to contemplate.
Anyone who cares for their children wants a decent society with generally assimilated values. The problem is not with social assimilation of values, but with overly central, arbitrary enforcement of values. The problem is not big government, but overly central, intrusive government. The Feds have no business doing a lot of things! With that, Conservatives agree. But local government, societies, clubs, churches, and families DO have business and interests. Some here seem to say Libertarians only want respect for the Constitution. But most Conservatives are already on board for that. I suspect Libertarians are hardly satisfied to restrict Feds from trying to legislate morality. Were they honest, most would admit they don't want anyone telling them what they can or can't do -- at any level. They think their second-hand smoke is harmless, and moral laws can't (or shouldn't) protect kids. Indeed, they think adults superintending kids (as with the Ten Commandments) is the cause of much of the crime and misery of the world. Maaybe even like child abuse. Sort of like developed economies supervising to preclude toddler-depsots from accessing nukes is supposed to show wrongheaded fault in developed economies for the blowback. It's the toddler mindset that, "You bad adults made me hurt myself!" Apparently, its a language-sin of some kind to lump Objectivists, Libertarians, Trustafarians, Muggles, and Old Toddlers all together. What --- are Objectivists any less vocal about not wanting anyone at any level telling them what to do? Is there some political distinction that makes a significant difference? As near as I can see, grown-up Libertarian Constitutionalists can be just as comfortable under a Conservative label as a Libertarian one. So, what do Libertarians mean to teach, when they strike their pose? Is there some kind of inside, well developed, common definition? Can someone state it succinctly, so I don't have to read extended Harry Potter lore? What I get is this: I can cram just as much weed as I want, both for me and your kid, and there's nothing you should do to slow me down, you Neo-Con.
Post a Comment