.
Nothing unfolds to the sequential record of informationally digitized manifestation without the previously participatory, simultaneous or preset, idealistic or representative, approval or disapproval of some perspective of consciousness --- whether primitive, holistic, organic, or human..
For a perspective of Consciousness to see a thing requires that it be reduced to a recognizable representation. For a program to relate a thing to its computations requires that it be reduced to a recognizable representation. This does not require that the thing actually be reduced to a representation, but that it be recognized by that which is relating to it and processing it as being reduced to a representation. In a way, recognition and recordation of things and patterns is a primitive marker of consciousness.
.
A representation of a thing is not the thing itself. Neither we nor computers can sense things as they are, yet the mathematics by which relations relate can avail incredibly precise measurements. We can model, conceptualize, program, and compute about that which we sense, to try to make consistent, coherent, complete sense of it. However, if the purposes of consciousness are never complete, then we will never make complete sense of our beingness. As our purposes change, our approaches to completeness may change. It is not necessarily clear that we make "progress" towards a complete model or conception of all that is and can be. Even the "best" model would depend on purpose, perspective, and context.
.
Can any model accord a way to reconcile that which manifests and can be manifested with that which we should seek to make manifest? Or that which quantifiably is with that which qualitatively should be? Can any model avail a way of communicating sensibly about moral concerns, without beclouding empirical methods? A coherent moral truth may abide with most forms of sacred myths and parables, yet defy being assimilated so long as so many people conflate the qualitative meaningfulness of myths with mathematically measurable reality. Is there a way to respect the various myths, wring good from evil out of the Babel, and assimilate a common way for translating and communicating morally civilizing concerns? I suspect there may be. The way would seem to relate consciousness with feedback programming.
.
.
UNIVERSAL OPERATING SYSTEM:
.
EXISTENCE ("UNIVERSAL COMPUTER") --- Our Operating System can be conceptualized as being organized, consisting of:
ESSENCE ("NATURE") --- Source Formulas that have capacity to interfunction, while holding to system-wide conservation to zero.
PRIMITIVE WILL --- That which, in feedback of apprehensive forebodings and appreciative postbodings, guides that which the System seeks to express, bringing a search for meaningful order out of chaos out of an otherwise conservation of zero.
MIND ("QUALITATIVE CONSCIOUSNESS") --- A Decoding Algorithm, which has Iterative capacity to apprehend, abstract, represent, and communicate interpretatons of interpretations of interpretations of such interfunctions, but which does not have capacity to decode itself.
CELLULAR BODY AND BRAIN ("BONDED MEMORY") --- Capacity to store sequentially established representations of Information, for availing Avatars or loci of organized operations within contexts of experiential manifestation.
EPIPHENOMENAL SIGNIFICATION --- The byproduct of such interfunctioning, decoding, and storeage of Information is the signification and quantitative measuring of what we often call "substantive physics."
ITERATIVE INTERCONNECTION --- Innate connective capacity to experience and project intuitive empathy, i.e., capacity to project civilizing, fluxing interpretations, "as if" they were fluxing between holistic fields and particular perspectives. "God" is the same for each of us, being that aspect of each of us that fluxes to function in field capacity, as if that which it apprehends and appreciates in such capacity should be applied to the universe as a whole. That aspect may be approached in enlightening meditation.
.
There abides and exists a thing in itself, which I call an Operating System or Bank of Information, which has capacity to be fluxed in infinite iterative ways, yet always remains the same essential thing. That Bank-in-itself is not a person, nor need it be conceptualized as being conscious like a person, whether or not holistically, in any way comparable to the consciousness that is iterated through each of our perspectives. Still, that Source of Information would seem to have capacity to interfunction and flux with itself. Information can be represented in formulas, and formulas can be conceptualized as constituting Information. The Bank of Information would seem to have some meta capacity or qualitative impetus to flux.
.Once a formula fluxes with other formulas, it would seem to be bonded with a perspective, i.e., a perspective of consciousness, regardless of whether in some permutations it may be thought dim versus "self aware" versus of infinite capacity. There is feedback between and among such meta-formulas of iterations of perspectives of Information.
.
Thus, complex iterations of perspectives may acquire capacities to represent, receive, interpret, sense, react with, transmit, communicate, and become self-aware of experiences of informational interfunctioning. Such iterations may become like human beings. Feedback from humans and other perspectives affects the quality for how Information is iterated. How we relate to the Bank affects what the Bank can avail to us. Each of us is empathetically connected as an iteration of the same quality of consciosness of the Information availed from the Bank.
.
Eventually, the formulas that comprise the body with which my perspective is bonded are consumed and re-expressed in different forms by other formulas and perspectives. However, consciousness continues to be expressed, and, indeed, cannot fail to be expressed in some respect, so long as meta formulas of Information abide and interfunction. Thus, the Bank reconciles all iterations of conscious expressiveness, and all such iterations affect how the reconciliation of the Bank unfolds. That is, each perspective has innate interest and empathy for how the Bank is preserved and what is reconciled to be in sequence pursued.
.
Thus, we are each connected, and the Bank is our Source. We each empathize to seek to intuit what the Bank should want, and try at some level to be guided by our apprehensions and appreciations of such wants. In so doing, we practice being receptive to the Source for guiding the quality of consciousness through which all our perspectives are reconciled. The quality of our meta-consciousness, spiritual empathy, and innate intuition can be experienced and lived, but it cannot be confined to measures. Its iterations of consciousness transcend, but its ideal (Son?) and its common essence (Holy Ghost?) of consciousness is/are as eternal as the existence of the Bank of Information (God-Source). The quality of separateness among iterations is derivative, but the essence of their commonality is as real as the Bank.
****
DERIVATIVE REALITY: Substance in matter, energy, and body is “real” only in being derivative (in respect of apprehension, interpretation, and represented storeage of Information) of iteration of Consciousness. That is, Physics and physical bodies consist of stores of Information (formulas for transforming and transferring conservations and reorganizations among equations). Some of these stores of Information are sensed, perceived, represented, and communicated about, by iterative perspectives of Consciousness. And some of these stores of Information constitute bodies and brains for leveraging capacities for perspectives of Consciousness to store and trade communications about perceptions about representations of formulaic organizations and stores of Information.
.
SYNCHRONOCITY OF AVATARS AND PERCEPTIONS: Divisions among forms that flux as interfunctioning formulas bring with their digital fluxes, separations, and interfunctions — simultaneously — bondings for iterative identities and perspectives of Consciousness. Consciousness must either bond its Identity with a bodily store of Information, or Consciousness must experience and sense such Information as if it were a separate body, apart from the locus of a bonded perspective of Consciousness.
.
PHYSICAL ENTROPY AND SPIRITUAL EVOLUTION: It is often noted that the measurable Entropy or extent of Disorganization of Substance proceeds along an arrow or direction of increase, while the amount or complexity of Information seems also to increase. That is, Substance tends to become more Disorganized, while Information tends to become more Organized or Complex. The longer physical organization decreases, the more informational organization (and conscious experience of it?) seems to increase. The more bodies and brains die, ceteris paribus, the more complex and potentially powerful seem to become the bodies and brains that evolve and follow.
.
REINCARNATION: Separate iterations of Consciousness seem to end (die) as bodies die, yet, insofar as Consciousness itself abides as an Identity derivative of the Source, subsequent iterations tend to absorb, recycle, and render even more complex the experiential Information of previous iterations. Each iteration is connected, and each iteration participates in the dance of feedback that guides the evolutionary adventures of Consciousness, and each iteration is bound to avail subsequent re-absorptions and re-expressions, with ever more complex forms and ecologies. Iterations are mortal to their defining and limiting contexts, while Consciousness itself is perpetual.
.
POTENTIALITY IS NOT ALTOGETHER UNLIKE THE BLANK SLATE AVAILED BY AN ETCH A SKETCH: The common beingness of our connected iterations of consciousness is not altogether unlike the blank slate of infinite potential that is innate to a process of computing, whereby good and evil are guided by a dance of perpetual unfolding of choices made and pre-made in appreciative feedback to apprehensions.
.
Fundamentals drive consciousness to seek to learn and experience its expressive potentiality.There are no computing problems; only ineffective programming.
"Roll me up and smoke me when I die."
3 comments:
Both parties seem to be rife with predatory con artists, although the Left sees connivery as an art form in itself, while the Right sees it mainly as a way of doing business. The Right shows more concern for decency only because conservers of liberty try to assert influence through the Republican Party. Still, the predatory pattern for controlling hive-minds through Big Deception has infested through and through. A populist will has conditioned sheeple to yearn to belong and to be dominated by fascists.
Fascism is good for girlie boys and little girls who want either to dress up and pretend to be gods of their own juices or never to have to grow up and be responsible (other than to submit to some idol). There is Liberal Fascism (enforced collectivist usurpation of individual Will) and Libertarian Fascism (government enforced indoctrination of children to tolerate the intolerable, i.e., to lead us to tolerate the dispersal of drugs and sex to children). To them, to simper in an alcoholic, opium, or OPM haze is far more important, groovy, and virtuous than to seek to intuit and follow a Reconciler. They tend not to believe that people of good faith have intuitive or empathetic access to any Reconciler higher than their own little wannas. Or, they believe in a false reconciler, who does not want them to exercise Will or take responsibility other than to submit to, and obey, masters of mindlessness and dopery. They are neither principled nor unprincipled. Rather, they are a-principled, because they renounce Responsible Will.
Indeed, the a-principled tend not to believe in any qualitatively real basis for faith at all, much less good faith. This may mark THE QUALITATIVE DISTINCTION between those adults who Will to take responsibility for their own desires and conduct versus those perpetual little, doped-up, zombie kids who want no part of individual responsibility. Even when obamakids prance as pretended leaders, they blame predecessors and everyone and everything --- except themselves. And always, always, they leave enormous, messy, dirty diapers, needles, viruses, and vandalism.
Collectivization siphons responsibility, authority, and rights to central command. We don't have State's Rights. We have Feds taking the lion's share of taxes and then redistributing crumbs to the little state's it favors. Soon, we won't have family rights. Instead, Feds will siphon command over all children to Central Control. Non-traditionalists don't want to be individually responsible, so they mean to see to it that no one else can be, either. Meanwhile, our educated idiots tell us this is "progress."
From A.T. -- Re: "the kind of guy who fights on behalf of the poor against the rich"
No canopy crony for any party fights on behalf of the poor. They all fight to increase sway over the canopy. The stuff about helping the poor and feeling their pain is just fertilizer for growing idiots. If the poor want help, they need to grow up and learn to help themselves regain responsibility and control over themselves, not wait around for some liar to redistribute from some delusionary stash. Good charities try to teach the poor to learn how to take better care of themselves. And that is not by joining gangs, rat packs, posses, or acornites. If you have skill, use it. If you must beg, go to a charity. Don't mass to tax just to take. Rather, tax to build infrastructure that can facilitate human freedom.
Post a Comment