RENORMALIZATION OF THE SHARED CHRONOLOGY-FRAMEWORK FOR PURPOSES OF MORAL INTUTION AND PHILOSOPHY:
SPEED OF PERCEPTION SHARED AMONG RENORMALIZED IDENTITIES: A being that were perceived to travel faster than the speed of light (or the speed of gravity) would be a being that was perceived to upset the present informational record of chronological sequences. All beings that did not travel faster than the speed of light would be renormalized in their identities and experiences such that they would have no empirical way to prove or notice the alterations. What would be the relative frame of perception among beings that each traveled at the same or different speeds in excess of the speed of light? Do identities often travel faster than the speed of light in relation to one another, but simply renormalize their measurable and relational perceptions to make it appear that they do not? Can or does any unifying Identity exceed the speed of light and know that it does and know what alterations it has effected in the continuous renormalization and reconciliation of locally measurable events?
ILLUSIONS DERIVATIVE OF THE META: In the way that all measurable Substance (matter, energy, spin, revolution, orbit, charge, potential, polarity, frequency, wavelength, amplitude, intensity, distance, space, chronology, time, radiation, vector, direction, and appearance) is illusion, so also is speed a relational illusion. Why does the relative-constant of the speed of light appear to be a real constant, almost like a rule-in-itself? Well, in the way that all measurable appearance is renormalized to each experiential perspective (avatar of identity) of consciousness, so also, by definition, those perspectives that happen to share an experience of a chronology of events will perceive their relationships as being renormalized to preserve their shared chronologies. No perspective can share the chronology-framework unless it is constrained (renormalized and reconciled) so as not to measure any event as exceeding a speed that avails such chronology preservation.
USEFUL FICTIONS OF LIGHT AND TIME AS THINGS IN THEMSELVES: It is not that the speed of light is a constant-in-itself. It is that those perspectives that happen to relate to share a chronology-framework cannot be allowed to measure a speed that would exceed the capacity of the framework to preserve its recordation and perception of a shared chronology. For any single perspective to have power to measure a relative and continuous violation of the Limiting-Speed-Of-Renormalizing-Perception (light) would be for it, and it alone, to have power to upset and render chaotic the framework of shared chronology. All perspectives that would share a non-chaotic framework of experiential chronology must share a renormalization of their experiences in such a way that no one among them is allowed to upset the common chronology. It is not that the speed of light is "really" constant. It is that each perspective is constrained in the way it is renormalized to the shared framework to make the appearance of light appear to occur at a relationally-constant speed.
LIMITATION OF SPEED WITHIN THE CONTINUITY: It is not that no light-in-itself exceeds the relational speed. It is that no light-as-it-is-perceivable is able to be related to any particular foci or perspective except such light as avails renormalization of perceptions to the limiting speed that is requisite to the preservation of the shared chronology. Thus, in traversing through a continuity of space or space-time, no individual is allowed to perceive or experience a relational violation of the speed of light. Continuous travel in excess of the speed of light is not allowed. But, what about instantaneous travel, or "spooky action at a distance"?
INSTANTANEOUS CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION: Can Information be conveyed at a distance, instantaneously? Well, it appears events can be reliably connected and correlated, instantaneously and from a distance. But can Information be so conveyed by any individual less than the Godhead??? It seems presently unknown whether this is unknowable.
TIME IS USEFULLY CONCEPTUALIZED AS BEING BOTH GRANULAR AND STRETCHABLE: It appears that personages at remote segments of the cosmos would experience the sequential unfolding of events to be proceeding at different rates. "Time-in-itself" does not exist, except as a conceptualization or useful fiction. As a useful fiction, is time-in-itself best conceptualized as being granular, continuous, or "stretchable"? Unless time as we experience it is "stretchable," it would not appear that correllative points could long preserve polarized and correlated action at a distance. Unless time as we experience it is both granular and stretchable, it would seem that reliable transmission of Information from a remote distance is not permitted. Time exists as a useful fiction in respect that the math of the Godhead that renormalizes and preserves chronologies treats time as if it consisted in respect of meta-particles that are both mathematically granular and stretchable.
RATE RENORMALIZATION WITHIN CHRONOLOGY PRESERVATION: If points of time as we experience them are, in respect of a common and renormalizing system of meta-math, both granular and stretchable, then, even though continuous travel in excess of the speed of light is not possible, INSTANTANEOUS travel and transmission of Information may be possible -- without upsetting the chronology framework. Thus, even though different perspectives from different foci may experience events as unfolding at different relational rates, they will still perceive the events as unfolding in the same sequences. Thus, the shared renormalization rule of the chronology-framework dictates that events may be perceived from different perspectives to unfold at different rates and in different degrees of focused clarity or collapsed fuzziness, but not in different sequences.
VIRTUAL PARTICLES: If, at some level, Information is instantly conveyable back and forth across both space and time, and without direct contact between "particles," without such Information being useable by humanity to alter macro chronologies, then such forays back and forth between the present and the future may be modeled as proceeding under a conceptual fiction concerning "virtual particles."
GODHEAD: In respect that it is reasonable to conceptualize that all appearances of measurable Substance are, in themselves, merely illusions, derivative of a Meta Essence-Source, it seems reasonable, for purposes of Moral Intuition, to suppose that all that appears is derivative of something about the Godhead that avails it to sponsor and experience a potential infinity of Perspectives of its Identity by nothing more than applying various maths of renormalization to Itself. But for such renormalization to be reconciled by the common and caring Godhead, there would abide no way for each perspective to part-icipate being a-part from, or in communication with, any others. This is the essential basis for Moral Philosophy.
TRINITY: The Godhead is trinitarian in IT's aspects for availing Consciousness, Substance, and Information (CSI).
CHANGELESS-CHANGER: It is sometimes thought that the only thing that does not change is change itself. (No river flows twice through the same channel.) How can this be? It can be because the changeless aspect is immaterial and immeasurable, while the the changing aspect is relationally measurable and renormalizing. It abides because the Essence-Source somehow has capacity to experience and communicate with itself among various different perspectives, whose locus in measurable space-time is derivative of mere math applied to a meta aspect. CONUNDRUM: If time does not really exist as a thing-in-itself, then does the Source-Essence "really" learn, remember, change its "Mind" -- or does IT just know, appreciate and Empathize in respect of IT's Eternal Present?
THE ESSENTIAL MORAL COMMANDMENT: The essence of the Great Commandment and the Golden Rule: Be Empathetic! That is, be respectful of what is needed to exemplify, establish and sustain human freedom and dignity and to lead it towards sublime surpassage.
**********
RENORMALIZATION OF SPEED OF GRAVITY:
How can a body that is not under the directional control of any force -- other than the propulsion of its initial creation (or se-part-ation) and the push or pull of gravitational distortions in space-time -- exhibit simultaneous conformance with the gravitational constants of multiple fields when it comes under the influence of competing gravitational frames of reference?
Well, different gravitational distortions probably harmonize in additive, sequential, and lagging center-of-gravity effects (gravitational drag), rather than compete. And, various curvature effects in respect of spins, revolutions and orbits may harmonize, so that effects of gravitational constants are preserved in that way. And, web stretching or compressing of granular points of space, time, and space-time may fuzz out what would otherwise constitute violations of renormalization of bodies to locally significant frames of gravitational reference. If so, renormalization is possible because of shedding or gap-filling of Information between perspectives, i.e., ranges of significant clarity and fuzziness.
In any event, mass and gravitational force (geometric curvature in space-time), in respect of the Meta Essence-Source, are as derivative and ultimately illusory as any other dimensional aspect of relatively-measured Substance. Thus, gravity is an aspect of the expression of the Essence-Source of distortions in space-time, as the Essence-Source (Godhead) applies math to itself, to renormalize foci for its various perspectives.
ELECTORMAGNETIC CHARGES IN SPACE-TIME:
May micro relations among particles at and below the atomic level be usefully conceptualized as following geometrically-induced distortions in the field of space-time in such a way as to produce vectored and potentialized levels of elecrical charges or polarized relations? Even if so, such fields of disturbance and distortion in space-time would not, in themselves, be real. That is, geometry is not a "real-er" math than arithmetic. Ultimately, geometry is also derivative of the Essence-Source applying math to renormalize foci for its various perspectives.
RENORMALIZATION OF THE POTENTIAL OF INFINITY:
Intuitively, the potential flux of the math that can be applied by the Essence-Source to itself appears to be infinite. The experience of the Potential is made Manifest as Information is recorded or Conscious Observation is experienced. It may be that the Essence-Source does not appreciate all potential unless and until and as IT "applies" math to Itself, to make events manifest. "Applies" entails becoming. Becoming abides between being and has been. Whether, how or why the Essence-Source experiments, chooses, decides, guides, proposes or purposes to Becoming is a sacred mystery, approachable only in Intuition, Empathy, and Faith.
STRETCHING, COMPRESSING, LOSING, FUZZING AND SHORTHAND INTERPRETING OF INFORMATION:
All Information about every event that can be directly and contemporaneously experienced to interpretive sensation as the sensation occurs is not instantly conveyable to another perspective whose senses are set, defined and limited to operate from a locus that is made to it to appear to abide at a remote distance. Some Information is necessarily lost or fuzzed in the interpretive recording, bundling, stretching or compressing of it.
For example, a twin who is situated at such a distance and in such a gravitational frame as to age faster than his counterpart will not be capacitated to receive Information after his death concerning the ongoing experiences of his younger twin.
Moreover, Information that is bundled and reduced to representative form will inevitably take on a gloss from its interpreter, and its interpreter will have to reduce the Information to such bits in which he or it took interest and care to record and convey.
For example, a writer who undertook to describe events of the last year would typically omit describing some events altogether and would tend to give shorthand interpretations of events that required more time in their actual unfolding. A description of all events that occurred during the time that is represented by a writing (or compressed recordation) about them will necessarily constitute a selected, edited, shorthand and indirect interpretation of such events -- even if such writing itself were instantaneously conveyed to the granular, stretchable and contemporaneous time of a distant twin.
Thus, between the distances that appear to separate perspectives, the cosmos necessarily conveys fuzzed, incomplete, selected, and inexact recordations and descriptions of distant events as they occur locally. Thus, using conveyances of bursts of compressed, or digitized bits or writings cannot fill or clarify all gaps or fuzzes in Information as it unfolds from and between distant loci. Mortals simply cannot access all the Information that is created by or accessible to the Godhead.
UNCANNY AND CREATIVE DANCE OF MATH WITH THE UNFOLDING OF TECHNOLOGIES: If we conceptualize that time is both granular and stretchable, then, depending on our relational vectors within the web of space-time, we will more likely develop maths that will facilitate technologies for the spooky and instantaneous transmission of digitized bursts of information from a distance. Make it so!
**************
**************
COMMENT:
I think people wonder where our need to survive in a group came from. To say morality comes from our need to survive in a group is to beg a question: What group should take priority? And, if a multicellular organism constitutes a group, then should a single organism that somehow acquires the most situational power be then and there thought to be the most authoritative fount of moral instruction? If might makes right, then what would be the point of pondering what is right? One would, like Progs, merely FEEL what is right. Non-Progs tend to think there is more to a decent life than just surviving. Many think a kind of meta empathy is perhaps the superior reality over a merely derivative and inferior illusory ride.
*********
RENORMALIZATION OF ILLUSIONS: In the way that all measurable Substance (mass, gravity, matter, energy, spin, revolution, orbit, charge, potential, polarity, frequency, wavelength, amplitude, intensity, distance, space, chronology, time, radiation, vector, direction, and appearance) is illusion, so also is speed (as in speed of light and speed of gravity), ultimately, a relational illusion. Why does the relative-constant of the speed of light appear to be a real constant, almost like a rule-in-itself? Well, in the way that all measurable appearance is renormalized to each experiential perspective, so also, by definition, those perspectives that happen to share an experience of a chronology of events will perceive their relationships as being renormalized to preserve their shared chronologies. No perspective can share the chronology-framework unless it is constrained (renormalized and reconciled) so as not to measure any event as exceeding a speed that avails such chronology-preservation.
USEFUL FICTIONS OF LIGHT AND TIME AS THINGS IN THEMSELVES: It is not that the speed of light is a constant-in-itself. It is that those perspectives that happen to relate to share a chronology-framework cannot be allowed to measure a speed that would exceed the capacity of the framework to preserve its recordation and perception of a shared chronology. For any single perspective to have power to measure a relative and continuous violation of the Limiting-Speed-Of-Renormalizing-Perception (light) would be for it, and it alone, to have power to upset and render chaotic the framework of shared chronology. All perspectives that would share a non-chaotic framework of experiential chronology must share a renormalization of their experiences in such a way that no one among them is allowed to upset the common chronology. It is not that the speed of light is "really" constant. It is that each and every focus for recording Information and observation for experiencing Consciousness is constrained so as to be renormalized to the shared framework, to make the appearance of light and gravity appear to occur at relationally-constant speeds.
In traversing through a continuity of space or space-time, no individual is allowed to perceive or experience a relational violation of the speed of light. Continuous travel in excess of the speed of light is not allowed. But, what about instantaneous travel, or "spooky action at a distance"? Can Information be conveyed at a distance, instantaneously? Well, it appears events can be reliably connected and correlated, instantaneously and from a distance. But can Information be so conveyed by any individual who is less than the Godhead? It seems presently unknown whether this is unknowable.
TIME MAY BE USEFULLY CONCEPTUALIZED AS BEING BOTH GRANULAR AND STRETCHABLE: It appears that personages at remote segments of the cosmos would experience the sequential unfolding of events to be proceeding at different rates. "Time-in-itself" does not exist, except as a conceptualization or useful fiction. As a useful fiction, is time-in-itself best conceptualized as being granular, continuous, stretchable, or both granular and stretchable?
Unless time as we experience it is both granular and stretchable, it would seem that reliable and correlated transmission of Information from a remote distance could not be facilitated. Intuitively, it seems that time exists only as a useful fiction. That is, a math of the Godhead that would renormalize and preserve chronologies may treat time as if it consists of meta-particles that are, mathematically, both granular and stretchable.
If points of time as we contrive to measure and experience them are, in respect of a common and renormalizing system of meta-math, both granular and stretchable, then, even though continuous travel in excess of the speed of light is not possible, INSTANTANEOUS travel and transmission of Information may be possible -- without upsetting the chronology framework. Thus, even though different perspectives from different foci may experience events as unfolding at different relational rates, they will still perceive the events as unfolding in the same sequences.
GODHEAD: In respect that it seems reasonable, for the purpose of moral philosophy, to conceptualize that all appearances of measurable Substance are, in themselves, merely illusions, derivative of a Meta Essence-Source, it seems reasonable to suppose that all that appears is derivative of something about the Godhead that avails it to sponsor and experience a potential infinity of Perspectives of its Identity by nothing more than applying various maths of renormalization to Itself. But for such renormalization to be reconciled by the common Godhead, there would abide no way for each perspective to part-icipate being a-part from, or in communication with, any other. This would seem to be an essential basis for Moral Philosophy.
CHANGELESS-CHANGER: It is sometimes thought that the only thing that does not change is change itself. (No river flows twice through the same channel.) How can this be? It can be because the Changeless Aspect is immaterial and immeasurable, while the Changing Aspect is relationally measurable and renormalizing. It abides because the Essence-Source somehow has capacity to experience and communicate with itself among various different perspectives, whose locus in measurable space-time is derivative of mere math applied to a meta aspect.
THE ESSENTIAL MORAL COMMANDMENT: The essence of the Great Commandment and the Golden Rule: Be Empathetic! That is, be respectful of what is needed to exemplify, establish and sustain human freedom and dignity and to lead it towards sublime surpassage.
RENORMALIZATION OF THE POTENTIAL OF INFINITY: Intuitively, the potential flux of the math (that can be applied by the Essence-Source to itself) appears to be infinite. The experience of the Potential is made Manifest as Information is recorded or Conscious Observation is experienced. It may be that the Essence-Source does not appreciate all potential unless and until and as IT "applies" math to Itself, to make events manifest. "Applies" entails becoming. Becoming abides between "being" and "has been." Whether, how or why the Essence-Source experiments, chooses, decides, guides, proposes or purposes to Becoming is a sacred mystery, perhaps approachable less in logic and empiricism than in Intuition, Empathy, and Faith.
*******
ANALOGY FOR GOVERNANCE: In similar fashion, a decent and representative republic ought to renormalize wealth and power among its citizens, so that no one person or generation acquires such disproportionate wealth, power, property or influence as to subjugate the participatory freedom of most others.
PHASE TRANSITION: A thing that flips into a violation of the rules that define it will accompany a phase flip -- in itself, the system that defines it, or both. A person who becomes too powerful to be a citizen of a republic will become no longer a citizen and no longer a member of a republic. He will become despot over a dictatorship.
No comments:
Post a Comment