The Oligarchy is using our universities to shape foreign students to become evangelists not for representative republicanism but for the NWO. They get Americans to go along with this by using crocodile tears to appeal to our sympathy and charity. Then, the newly trained foreign students go home to teach their cronies how to siphon wealth by calling it charity.
"So much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot." -- George Orwell
I agree that we need to switch from income taxation to consumption taxation. The only problem I have with the Fair Tax is that it is too linear. It would do nothing to address the biggest challenge today to the representative republic: The fact that most representatives work more for the oligarchy than for the citizenry.
That is a fact to which the SJWs, Dinos, and Rinos are oblivious, as they seek to give ever more power to the central apparatus (media-academia-banking) --- even though it is controlled by oligarchic moochers. The fact is that oligarchic wealth tends to snowball and agglomerate as it acquires control over all the institutions of politics. That is what is feeding and powering the NWO putsch to worldwide enserfment.
I am not anti-consumption. I am pro-responsible-budgeting.
I agree that we need to switch from income taxation to consumption taxation. The only problem I have with the Fair Tax is that it is too linear. It would do nothing to address the biggest challenge today to the representative republic: The fact that most representatives work more for the oligarchy than for the citizenry.
That is a fact to which the SJWs, Dinos, and Rinos are oblivious, as they seek to give ever more power to the central apparatus (media-academia-banking) --- even though it is controlled by oligarchic moochers. The fact is that oligarchic wealth tends to snowball and agglomerate as it acquires control over all the institutions of politics. That is what is feeding and powering the NWO putsch to worldwide enserfment.
Whatever the oligarchy pays for in taxes, it tends more than to make up for in extractions of political favors. Whatever the poor extract from the gov, the oligarchy tends to pass on to the producing workers. In effect, the various gangs of parasitical SJWs mean to redistribute poverty to the middle class in exchange for despotic power to the oligarchy.
Because this produces little and drags a lot, it tends to the social detriment of everyone. The need is this: To privatize productive work by freeing industriousness, without freeing crony oligarchs to protect their perch by shackling the masses. This requires insight into phase shifts, beyond linear thinking. Ever more linear agglomeration of wealth into the hands of a few self-selecting self-godding political-moochers is not always a good thing.
Might it make more sense, ideally, not to tax domestic businesses on income or profits, and instead to tax the individuals to whom salaries or withdrawals are paid, but only on their personal consumption (broadly defined to include personal purchases, personal investments, personal charitable and political contributions)?
If we want individuals to save more, then tax consumption, not income. If we want more production to come from businesses instead of gov, then don't tax businesses on their productive operations. if we want a more productive society generally, then don't turn a welfare safety net into a hammock. If we generally want less gov, more production, and less consumption, then don't tax productive work, but do tax personal consumption.
If we don't want an oligarchy to be able to consume gov and destroy representative republicanism, then tax the oligarchy on its use of wealth to consume political influence by treating all lobbying expenses as if they were the taxable consumption of the agent who authorized it. If necessary to bring the oligarchy under control, make the tax on consumption progressive.
The oligarchy loves the tax on income, since it pulls up the ladders on potential competitors. Replace the income tax with a tax that reaches wealth by taxing consumption.
****************
Civilization seems to undergo something like a moral flip to the Second Law of Thermodynamics: Entropic decline of ordered liberty. IOW, a lot of people want to be farmed, because thinking for themselves is so hard. They are like free range cattle, there for the collecting and farming.
Falling to Oligarchical Collectivism: Those that value free speech and human dignity are less inclined to capitalize, organize, or pursue opportunities to direct speech or thought. Over time, the promotion and evolution of people-farmers (anti-humans) and people-farming institutions and businesses is favored. Like natural selection of a meme.
Non-billionaires that value human freedom and dignity need to organize more businesses and volunteer coops to promote freedom -- to protect the evolution of civilizations that resist the natural devolution of people farms under the thumbs of oligarchical collectivists. As things stand, most institutions and think tanks have come to be run by and for anti-humans. It may already be unlikely that such trend can ever be reversed.
Absent course correction, the Uniparty Axis of Corrupt and Dumas Progs (wannabe people-farmers and farmees), by all-invasive PC political favors, propaganda, and regulations (against "hate speech", "white privilege", unvarnished truth; for open societies, open borders, and open marriages) --- means by all possible measures to outlaw and kill every representative republic.
The more people succumb to wanting to be farmed as moo cows, the faster the light will die and the sooner most people will start loving Big (settled science) Brother.
***************
Multi-Culti Divide-and-Rule is segregation of the people into separate cattle pens. The People Farm runs more efficiently that way. Anyone who refuses to tolerate the New World People Farm is a racisssst. Except Whities. They have to serve and pay reparations. Refusing to do that is also racissst. Everything that would sustain the representative republic is racissst.
Because Trump wants to restore the representative republic, he is a racissst and must be nullified. The People Farmers and their Farmees say so. And since their Owners own and run Congress, that will never be investigated. Instead, everyone that cooperates with any other nation (such as Russia) to resist People Farmers (such as Islam and the NWO) will be investigated, defamed, hounded, ridiculed, audited, sued, and, if necessary, eliminated.
Congress has become a Criminalized Syndicate. It will only investigate those who mess with its thing. The republic has become a rotted fish, with every institution rotted, from the head down. Much of the Congress/CivilService/Media/Academia/ThinkTank/Priesthood Apparatus sucks. Big time. Slurping Down economic theory.
To hope to restore the republic, Trump/DOJ needs to investigate, charge, convict, and imprison a lot of high level malefactors. They know that. Which is why the Oligarchs are in a frenzy to nullify Trump. Simply stated, those that help them are the worst of Corrupti and Ignoranti. Likely, there will be blood.
************
Atheism: A head-circling-hinny belief that the Source of reason must not exist unless it can be proved in reason. Or, that there must not abide a Godhead unless it can be fully comprehended by mortals. Or, that moral principles can be consistently and objectively derived by resorting to pure scientism (so that gov should be determined by experts, rather than by voting citizens).
Young people in school and in a phase for questioning all authority tend to question religion. As they mature, many realize they are not so atheistic, after all. And some come to apprehend how their default belief in the better or more natural goodness of gov is, well, not very intelligent. To extract a proposition from such a snapshot of a changing demographic, to say that atheists tend to be more intelligent generally, is rather tool-ish.
What a load of feces mixed into the punchbowl! Are atheists more intelligent than proggie people who believe gov is naturally inclined to look out for them? I much doubt that atheistic proggies tend to be intelligent enough to apprehend that organized force inclines more to look out for the interests of its organizers than for the interests of the general population. Are atheistic Marxists intelligent enough to sniff out utter bs? Nope, afraid not.
Yes, the Muslims are among the lowest. Sub-human, even. Yes, People Farmers seek to reduce nations to a lowest common denominator. No, People Farmers do not value any culture that resists movement towards the lowest common denominator. Yes, every culture can be destroyed by breeding to the lowest common denominator -- except the lowest culture.
The people who rule Western institutions do not care if the masses are ruled as cattle by agricultural scientists for the NWO. They do not care if jihadis help reduce the masses to cattle.
The West is testing, to determine whether a course of incentives, indoctrination, immigration, and intimidation can reduce republics so that the masses will equate being foot stools for Oligarchs with being "reasonable," i.e., fair minded and intelligent.
In lands of trans-sexualized surrender monkeys, urban beaches, and city colleges, the resounding answer so far is ... YES!
***********
There are a lot of people who are inconsolably unhappy, who nevertheless are more content when they are among others whom they are able to share and make misery. They are incorrigibly, un-fix-ably, co-dependent, femi-collectivists who want to marry the gov --- provided the gov will (lie and promise to) give them shelter without requiring anything in return. These people are unfit. They are unfit for a representative republic. When imported or indoctrinated in large numbers, they will kill a representative republic. They are also unfit for a commune. What they are fit for is only to be farmed. Hard.
No comments:
Post a Comment