Free Exercise of Religion

What makes the animosity of phony, drama-queen atheists so sad and maddening is that, in trying to define religion so as to "wall it away" from every connection with secular authorities, they remain so blind on so many fronts to their own unavoidable and hypocritical religions.

FIRST, the very idea of being an atheist (a theist?) tends to the absurd. Avowed "atheists" don't (and can't) share any rigorous idea --- of what a god, a religion, or even a (first or ultimate) cause --- necessarily would be. So they blow nonsense about terms that are largely undefined outside specialized limits (often contrived to trivialize a circular "explanation""). Yet, they think they are making better sense than non-atheists. 

Indeed, when one considers tenets thought essential to any particular philosophy, one will tend to find that some adherents of each such philosophy consider themselves to be atheists and others to be non-atheists. What mortal knows --- as opposed to believing, doubting, or ignoring --- what is or was the nature or character of the creation or unfolding of the cosmic bubble we happen to share? 

Without knowing (or having any way to prove) the ultimate nature or character of the cosmic matrix, and without any clear definition of god, religion, or even causation, what sense can it make for anyone to say (with feigned gravitas -- lol) whether he believes or doubts that there is a true god or true religion? 

Indeed, how can he even measure the "quantity" of his believing or doubting? So long as he believes he does not know, the other side of the coin of his spiritual belief is necessarily doubt. And vice-versa, the other side of his doubt is his gnawing apprehension that there may abide some true Source beyond absurd happenstance out of nothingness that is really somethingness. 

He can lack belief in any particular or literalistic silliness (such as a giant spaghetti monster), but he cannot articulate any basis for a complete disavowal (or knowledge of lack of existence) of a Source that abides beyond our quantifiable measure, but that yet may qualitatively influence or even reconcile our intuitions, empathies, apprehensions, and participations.

To have religious or spiritual faith in God (or a Godhead), it need not be considered necessary that one believe any special "revelation" in harps, tridents, eternal prisons, lakes of fire, monsters, genies, meta-virgins, meta-raisens, etc.) Rather, one may simply, to his innate intuition and empathy, believe there abides an inexplicable Source-Reconciler that nourishes and is nourished by its holistically reconciling feedback with its variously limited, passing, and particular Perspectives. A Source that reconciles all unfolding manifestations of degrees of freedom within the defining parameters of a matrix --- that happens to be shared by all Perspectives that happen to be availed to communicate in respect of it.

That is not to say that tenets specific to a particular church are devoid of sensible value. But it is to suggest that most such tenets concern ideas that tend to be more qualitatively figurative than quantifiably literalistic. That need not diminish their value as attractants, to avail forums and churches for people to congregate in good faith and good will, to seek to assimilate and appreciate shared values and purposes. Without the need for Knowitall Gov Masters.

So-called atheists often say they simply do not believe in any "particular god." Well, neither do I! I do not believe in a part-icular god. Part-iculars are passing mortals and fleeting forms and patterns. I do not believe in the literalisms of any particular religion. Yet, I do not consider myself un-Christian or an atheist. Rather, I believe (intuitively, empathetically, via my "sense of beingness," that a Reconciling Holism (a basis for higher-mindedness) abides. 

Wthout turning schizo or sociopathic, I doubt any person (even "Dexter") can long function without respecting some kind of Moral Code. As a person respects a Moral Code -- which is not knowable or provable in science, math, empiricism, or purely objective logic -- does he "really believe" a basis for it exists, or does he only act (sociopathicly) like he believes when he finds it convenient to his basest pleasures? If so, how can he claim any standing based in reason to advocate that the ideas of the Great Commandment and the Golden Rule, as being based in meta-reality, should be exiled (walled away) from the public square? Indeed, how can he reasonably advocate what anyone, or any government, SHOULD do?

SECOND, the idea that religion can be "walled away" from the secular affairs of the body-politic is itself, absurdly enough, religious --- notwithstanding protests of howlers. It presupposes that "real atheists" exist (i.e., that they can "really know" their own minds) and, absurdly, that they can assimilate "objective" moral values ("oughts from is"). 

Such an idea can be considered among the most absurd of "spaghetti monster religions," in that it is based in faith that higher mindedness can be coherently and consistently assimilated, without faith in any actual source or basis for such higher-mindedness. It is faith in morality, based on faith that morality does not really exist. As such, it tends in practice to be used to "justify" reduction to the lowest animal pleasures of conniving and deceiving people farmers. Because it denies that empathy is innately interpenetrating with the cosmos, it denies a real existential basis for good faith (Great Commandment) and good will (Golden Rule). Often, it is used to "justify" the confusing, conflating, abusing, and farming of the most gullible among useful idiots.

THIRD, the idea that elite scientists can derive ought from is easily leads to the killing of representative republics, to replace them with elite rule under phony moral scientisimists, whose strings tend to be pulled by the worst dregs that are floated to the top among filth-competing oligarchs, who themselves tend to be spiritually suffering under the abysmal blowback of their faith in their rotted pride and hubris.

BOTTOM LINE:  To my intuition, the spiritual cause of Moral Darkness is rampant and stubborn non-receptivity to the Source of spirituality, morality, direct intuition, and interconnecting empathy. And the giving over of all reason and morality to a scientism that has no capacity to derive "ought from is." The consequence is the floating of oligarchic crap to farm the people as if they were of no more worth than cattle. Evil flows and agglomerates from self-godding as surely as water flows downhill. Hedonists with no faith higher than pleasure naturally fall for and flock to lying, false-promising, bribing Oligarchs. The Godforsaken Uniparty of Rinos and Dinos is a tale as old as agriculture, although it has been called by different names throughout the ages.


**************************

Marxist Christianity is neither Marxist nor Christian. -- Jacques Ellul
The first requisite for the happiness of the people is the abolition of religion. – Karl Marx
If some few passages of the Bible may be favorable to communism, the general spirit of its doctrines is, nevertheless, totally opposed to it. -- Frederick Engels
Atheism is a natural and inseparable part of Marxism, of the theory and practice of scientific socialism. -- Vladimir Lenin

***************

Jesus was primarily concerned with the spiritual, not the material.
Unlike Marx, Jesus did not see Church and Family as obstacles to utopia.
Marxist atheism requires vastly different assumptions about metaphysics than Christianity.
A Christian does not deliberately set about raising a child or any other person to be an entitlement-minded and incompetent ingrate.
Jesus invites followers. Marx would dictate to the collective.
Christian equality stems from equality before the evaluation of God. Not from equality in results, forced by governmental redistribution.
Jesus valued people as individuals, not as Marxist widgets.
Jesus advocated charity as a safety net. He did not call upon government to equalize wealth.
Calling on individuals to do charity presupposes that they have been allowed to accumulate property and wealth. Nowhere does Jesus advocate or intimate that temporal property is theft.
Jesus did not judge against voluntary communal living, but neither did He advocate force of government to require it.

******************

"Privately entrusting resources to St. Peter, in subservience to God, differs greatly from "robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul" through a distant bureaucratic apparatus inspired by the humanist god of power. The Bible never endorses involuntary socialism administered by secular governments."

"The Puritans rapidly abandoned communalism – "that conceit of Plato's" – in favor of vigorous free enterprise, which proved both consistent with their strong religious sentiments, and a rapid path to prosperity."

"Communism fails except as augmented by fear (and ultimately there too), because forging "New Socialist Man" remains forever beyond the state's grasp. Only God can change men's hearts. Our base instincts betray us. When we see someone slacking and still taking - we produce less. When we see others taking beyond their share – we take more too. Without private property and opportunities for profit through honest toil, living standards stagnate."

"[T]the soft spoken women sitting next to the one pronouncing Jesus a communist simply said, "I lived in Communist Romania for thirty-one years. Don't tell me about Communism . . . Communism is death.""

-- http://www.forbes.com/sites/billflax/2011/05/12/do-marxism-and-christianity-have-anything-in-common/#73f295a06676

Workfare v. Welfare

We would agree that it is best when employment comes about through the private sector (preferably domestic as opposed to foreign). The hard case occurs when private corporatists are sitting on large quantities of money and are unwilling or undesirous of using such stashes to create more jobs or to hire more employees. Once they are that loaded, what's their incentive? Especially if, because of their successful lobbying, much of the tax revenue to pay the people out of work and on welfare comes from the middle class. How could mere tax cuts or gov spending cuts entice them to create more jobs if they are already loaded and unwilling themselves to create more jobs?

The Laffer Curve pertains to a sweet spot for tax cuts. Outside the sweet spot, it does not prescribe more tax cuts as a panacea. So long as the oligarchy is content to sit on its largess, I don't see how cutting taxes or welfare can create more jobs. Especially when the Oligarchy already has access to abundant cheap labor, illegal cheap labor, and foreign cheap labor.

More likely, cutting taxes and welfare in such a situation would lead to even cheaper labor, even greater chasm between the middle class and the Oligarchy, and even more buying and selling of political influence by the Oligarchy. To the greater destruction of the representative republic.

In this situation, switching from using tax revenue for workfare instead of for welfare may be one of the few ways to get more people working, more productive bang for the buck, and more political will to preserve the republic.

IAE, there is danger in the Oligarchy having such large stashes, with less job creation (productive work) in which to invest. For one thing, it is hard for a financial system to manage such a situation. If Oligarchs were to begin chasing fewer goods with more money, that could set off runaway inflation. If Oligarchs use their financial stashes instead to buy political influence, that would likely soon destroy what remains of the representative republic. Which would return us to the default system of serfdom.

I don't think the answer can always be cutting taxes, cutting spending, or cutting workfare. I think the situational flux calls for something more than purely linear thinking.

**************************

I indicated gov spending needs to be, and can be, moved closer to production. To say it cannot would translate into saying no change in gov spending, up or down, will affect net production.
I think that is false. To employ more people in workfare, rather than welfare, will tend to increase net production - - - unless the workfare is pulling people from private work instead of from welfare.
I don't see how that can be controversial.
Would you rather the gov get in the road making business by directly hiring every road worker, or would you rather the gov take bids, hire a prime contractor, and let him hire and fire the subs? Note: Various gov contracts can be perpetual, long term, cyclical, or site/time limited.
I suspect you would find hiring a prime, low bidding contractor, with incentives for early performance, to tend to get you more production for the buck. IOW, it would tend to move spending closer to production. In many cases, the improved infrastructure will then enhance productive capacities of private users.

*****************
The reality is, there will be a social safety net. Net, not hammock
The reality is, workfare is better, generally, than welfare. Transfer a lot of welfare money to workfare money. To pay private contractors to work on infrastructure. Not to simulate the economy, but to cure the entitlement mindset.
The reality is, as more jobs are taken by machines, such stopgap measures will be unavoidable. The alternative, to pay people for breathing, is too destructive to human freedom and dignity.
The reality is, this needs to be accompanied by incentives to reduce population.


********************

When welfare is tied to real work, more people will seek private employment.
I agree that jobs where employees work directly for the gov need to be reduced. Both in pay and in numbers.

*******************

Spending may be more palatable if it were more closely tied to getting people back to productive work.

The fear is less of immigrants than of the oligarchy (with which the Pope is complicit) that wants to push immigration by liberty-illiterates in order to destroy every representative republic that facilitates human freedom and dignity above the people farm. And it is less fear than righteous anger

******************

The genesis behind Agenda 21?  http://golden-dawn-international-newsroom.blogspot.com/2013/01/the-coudenhove-kalergi-plan-genocide-of.html
It is clear that those that want to farm people and those that want to be farmed have made an unholy alliance (of lions and hyenas?), by which they mean to subjugate everyone else.  Freedom and dignity for individuals is to be destroyed.  This is undeniable to anyone who looks at immigration policies, meant to drown every representative republic under onslaughts of liberty-illiterates.
This is why the Establishment of Corporatists and Oligarchs hates Trump and will do whatever it deems necessary to destroy him.  This is why his opponents are an alliance of corrupti and ignoranti, posing as "Progressives" and "Liberals."  They are liars.  There is nothing progressive, liberty-affirming, humane, or decent about these people-farming scum-suckers.  They are at war with every representative republic, and every representative republic that fails to see that is doomed.
The people-farming model is a monstrous amalgamation of Orwell's stick, Huxley's carrot, Marx's delusions, and Mohammad's evil.  Every decent person who opposes that evil amalgamation of pervs, perps, pueriles, pedophiles, profs, parasites, and people-farmers is castigated by the Oligarchy and its Oz Monkeys as "racist."

We need more Jews (perhaps especially among non-religiously affiliated Jews) to lose the hyphenation and focus on being great Americans. If they aren't religious, why subjugate the American Ideal to a law-drooling NWO nightmare of sheeple-regulation that masquerades as utopia?

Perhaps, instead of race, people could communicate about subjectively reinforced Social Affinities based on Superficial appearances ("SAS"). It may make more sense to consider people as SAS-ists than as racists.
What we have now is hypocrisy multiplied into un-sanity, so that light complexioned people (especially if male and coming from Germany) can be racists, but not dark complexioned people (even if they shout, Kill Whitey!).
Racism seems to be a construct that Marxists, Progs, and Free Stuff Mongers find so useful that they will not easily give it up.

*******************

We have been ruled by oligarchic shenanigans as far back as I can remember. Trump is the first and only President that might not be sold out to the oligarchy. So, this person quits. Why? The clear implication is that he served the oligarchy, not the American Ideal.
****************
Eisenhower warned (belatedly) about the "danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite": (IOW, oligarchy.)
In a nutshell, that precisely expresses what the uniparty of rino-dinos -- aided by the CIA -- wants to accomplish: To erase national borders and to establish an open society of NWO enserfment for the cheap-laboring masses. Proggies want to trade their human freedom and dignity for the security of a serf. They imagine that will promote fairness and equality. And the CIA helps to brand all who oppose as "white supremacists" or anti-Semites, or some such other shitty little trickery.

*****************

So, how many nations, cultures, elections (foreign and domestic) has the CIA, by subterfuge, destabilized, redirected, or replaced?
How responsive are the CIA, its higher officers, friendly politicians, and the Presidency, to the wishes of pay-to-play corporatists and oligarchs (domestic and international)?
Why is the CIA stirred to dislike Trump: is it related to the dislike of Trump by pay-to-play Establishmentarians who feel they're not getting what they're accustomed to paying for?
How loyal is the run of the mill CIA analyst to the American Ideal (which entails a representative republic under a system of checks and balances and separation of powers, as opposed to a ruling oligarchy)?
How many analysts see their purpose as being to push progress to an open society, borderless, NWO?
Why do you begrudge the ideal of making America great?

****************
What I hate is the ignorant and corrupt (law drooling) destruction of the representative republic.

***************
The cause of the darkness is rampant non-receptivity to the Source of spirituality, morality, direct intuition, and interconnecting empathy. And the giving over of all reason and morality to a scientism that has no capacity to derive "ought from is." The consequence is the floating of oligarchic crap to farm the people as if they were of no more worth than cattle. Evil flows and agglomerates from self-godding as surely as water flows downhill. Hedonists with no faith higher than pleasure naturally fall for and flock to lying, false-promising, bribing Oligarchs. The Uniparty of Rinos and Dinos is a tale as old as agriculture, although it has been called by different names throughout the ages.

**********************

The news media are the klowns. But the only ones laughing are the P's. The pervs, perps, profs, pueriles, pushers, parasites, pedophiles, and people farmers. All the "best" people. S/
Too bad for them they weren't quite fast enough to capsize the republic. Not that they didn't try, bless their hearts.

*************

I agree with Limbaugh, that the media (whores for the Oligarchy) that did not make Trump cannot break Trump.
If a Hitler comparison is to be made, it should be made more against the Oligarchy. The Oligarchy controls the media/academia, spreads division and disinformation, relentlessly repeats big lies, ridicules the values of ordinary Americans, incites thugs and looters and Oz monkeys, benefits by farming the masses, is willing to sacrifice untold numbers to feed its pleasures, taxes the people to "educate" useful idiots, and works to erase the borders and overturn the demography with Liberty-Illiterates and Hyphenates.
Ordinary Americans see all this! They will not turn against Trump so long as he opposes the fascist Oligarchy and seeks to reduce their grip on America in order to restore the separation of powers as envisioned by the Founders.
EDIT: Hitler was a despotic people farmer. He had no respect for the freedom or dignity of the masses. That is precisely what the ruling godless, god-mucked, self-godded oligarchy wants to be: People farmers.
Their role model is not Jesus. Their role model is an ugly amalgamation of Hitler-Stalin-Mao-Mohammad-BigBrother-MustaphaMond.

*****************

There's no fool like a person educated into foolery. A plain fool can learn. But a person educated into foolery is invested in it. Their "education" insulates them from common sense. For awhile, some may even become so adept in intellectually dishonest mental gymnastics that they become accomplished in superficial IQ tests. Fortunately, when they reach 40, more of them start to regain acquaintance with common sense. Likely, the ones that remain "liberals" after age 40 tend to be stupid --- both in IQ and in common sense.

****************

Worldviews Concerning People Farmers

Patterns evolve (change) within a matrix of allowed and coordinate parameters, where even the matrix seems to change, however slowly.
However, to say that rules of conservation constrain allowable parameters is not to say that choices within such parameter are disallowed. It is not to say that the precise path of every bit or particle is pre-determined. Nor is it to say who or what originates or changes the parameters (and even the matrix).

However, since rules of conservation so clearly appear to apply to the system as a holism, then feedback seems necessarily to be entailed --- to constrain unfolding changes to degrees of freedom within conserving (reconciling) parameters.

With math, we can measure and tinker with observations of limits, but we cannot prescribe the precise future path of any particle-in-itself. Perhaps because the very idea of a "particle-in-itself" poses a conundrum: How can the idea of a particle-in-itself communicate any meaning, in the absence of a medium (accumulating context) beyond the particle and a mind to form the idea? 
Substance, to be defined as other than trivial truism, is the presently communicable translation of a point of view (Consciousness) to amenable perspectives of a contextual frame (Information).

Consciousness (idealizing observer), Substance (particle), and Information (context) all seem to require (and feedback with) one another, in a fashion that is irreducibly Trinitarian (CSI). IOW, Consciousness seems to be an innate aspect (or "meta-face") of the measurable Cosmos.
If not by "pure empiricism," how does Consciousness and its various Perspectives ("personages") formulate and assimilate moral codes and meaningful purposes and ideals? My response: There must be entailed something or some process of appreciation and apprehension --- that abides beyond objective, substantive measure. Some reconciling process that is innately spiritual, intuitive, empathetic, caring, purposeful.

This is not inconsistent with observations that the physical brain and body seem to "make choices" a split second before the brain records (measures) self-awareness of the decision having been made. Rather, it begs a question: If purely biological processes are neither pre-determining nor choosing or reconciling of decisions, then who or what is? Perhaps something spiritual. Some metaphysical aspect of Mind, of which each of us is only a perspective --- because each particular Identity is formed and defined by how its limits have been imposed, rather than by how it has empowered itself.

The import is not scientific or technological. The import is to appreciate a legitimate human interest in spiritual intuitions and empathies --- and congregational forums for respecting and assimilating them. As opposed to Elite Moral Superiors to divine "scientific morality" to rule and impose "scientific betterment" ("progress") on the masses. The import has to do with respect for innate human freedom and dignity. As opposed to Marxist/Progressive/Liberal "scientific" management and regulation, as if we were mere cattle for superior oligarchs.

*****************

Substance, to be defined as other than trivial truism, is the presently communicable translation of a point of view (Consciousness) to amenable perspectives of a contextual frame (Information).

The "mechanism" for moral causation is that which is beyond measure, which is intuitive-empathetic-caring-appreciative-purposeful.  Each Perspective is a vehicle to that reconciliation.  No one perspective, as a particular perspective, can be the cause of that reconciliation.   Rather, each perspective of the Holism is only a participant.  It part-icipates as a part of the mechanism --- which is beyond measure.  It part-icipates from its perspective in experiencing the intuiton-empathy that, in its fullness, is beyond its measure. 

No particular Perspective has access to empirically measure the causal potency of that which is of the realm of intuition-empathy, but beyond measure.  Those who, from their Sense-of-Beingness, sense such reconciling potency, believe they benefit from congregational reinforcement of their receptivity to it. 

Those who do not believe, who think they do not sense such intuition-empathy in any way that is beyond measure, may someday "come to the light."  Or not.  Regardless, it would be hubristic, despotic, and evil of them to presume, without support in reason or science or philosophy, to deny such freedom in others to congregate in hopes of assimilating heightened senses of spiritual and moral purposefulness.


*******************

When scientists (scientismists and scientologists) pretend to have empirically defined moral crime, then Evil will have defined the scientists.
When a society is corrupt, "tells" may signal who is likely to defy the society --- but that does not mean that defying a corrupt society is a crime, unless ruling elites are allowed to make it so by fiat.
I think Steven Pinker and Sam Harris are very smart, but both seem to be morally blind in one eye and clouded in the other.

********************

Support Trump. Expose and discredit the people-farming oligarchy and its established media-academia apparatus. Rico the Oligarchs. Restore respect for the Separation of Powers as set out by the Founders. Promote understanding of the difference between science and scientism. Restore a decent regard for a Source of good faith and good will. Restore a decent regard for the common sense, freedom, and dignity of the ordinary liberty-literate American. Stop the immigration of liberty illiterates and Muslims. Point out the hypocritical bigotry and racism of the Uniparty of Rinos and Dinos. Ridicule the phony religious faith in a beneficent elite of moral scientists intent on ruling some kind of "objective" fairness and equality in results. Restore the assimilating value of congregations meeting in good faith to appreciate the founding religious parables and figures of speech. Decentralize and enhance gov investments in infrastructure, while getting gov out of the PC, education, and fake charity businesses. More workfare; less welfare. More personal dignity; less free stuff. More work; less entitlement. More Americans; fewer Hyphenates. More assimilation; fewer enclaves and ghettos. MAGA. But don't waste resources trying to force liberty literacy on liberty-illiterate cultures. Expose race baiters, phobe baiters, crybullies, and femi-whiners bent on making every opponent out to be an anti-Semite or part of a "War on Women."

*****************

Regarding the "danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite":
In a nutshell, that precisely expresses what the uniparty of rino-dinos wants to accomplish: To erase national borders and to establish an open society of NWO enserfment for the cheap-laboring masses. Proggies want to trade their human freedom and dignity for the security of a serf. They imagine that will promote fairness and equality.

**************

The more "scientists" try to convert philosophical issues of morality and spirituality into issues of science, the more they sound like Scientologists. Next, they will want to audit us for our crime thought.

**************

"Fascist" doesn't have a rigorous meaning. It has become a word for all seasons, to mean whatever the uniparty of corrupti and ignoranti want it to mean. It is now mainly an epithet against those that oppose the destruction of national borders so they can be replaced by the oligarchy-ruled NWO. IOW, unicorn utopia. s/

************

Soros wears the hat of a socialist one minute and the hat of a fascist the next. His ilk want the masses to believe in socialism so they can be more easily prodded to the fascist farm. This is common sense, but "smart" (phony) "liberals" are too stupid to see that modern liberalism entails the destruction of liberty.

Satan's oldest trick is to call his opponents evil. So of course the fascist oligarchic establishment that opposes Trump will call him fascist. And of course they will deceive the masses with promises of socialistic unicorns --- the better to enserf them to the fascist farm.
But the elephantine questions are: If Trump is the fascist, then why are so many oligarchic billionaires and corporatists so aggressively aligned against him?
If Satan is so good, then why are so many pleasure addicts so sick and miserable?
If free stuff is so free, then why is everyone so much more regulated?

Watch The Miracle Worker, now on Netflix or Amazon Prime, not sure which. The way the Teacher got Helen Keller to move past barbarism into enlightenment was by removing her to a separate cabin, away from the family that was rewarding her for being a barbarian. But for that, the darkness would have continued to own Helen.

Next, Progs will be demanding a 5 year plan to provide "free" charter-cyborg-hive-implants, to destroy both the fascist system of innate inequalities in mental aptitudes and the favoring of those that work hard. They want hive-mind to reign in a 1000 year Reich for the Borg.

***********

It seems that every school with strings to the oligarchy is used to make some students out to be goats and others parasites --- to condition minds to socialism, so they can be cheaply bribed and more easily made to swoon for fascists. The founding ideas of individual competence, responsibility, freedom, and dignity are discredited and replaced by the buzz of hive mind.
Eventually, most of the students will swarm to vote, work, and pay for their own enserfment. The propaganda/indoctrination/advertising mind-reduction apparatus has become strong throughout media and academia. Everyone who wants to be promoted in this crap-filtering-selecting-process needs, by careful adherence PC, to swear fealty.
The consequence is mass corruption. Among such corrupti, the most deceitful leaders will tend to have higher IQs, but lower common sense and much lower moral fiber. Those that succeed without selling out to the prevailing evil will likely be smarter still. Those that reach 40 yet still subscribe to the ProgBS are likely sub-marginal.
Charter schools, to the extent beholden to the central apparatus, will find it hard to change the selection filters now hardened in place. And the fascist oligarchy that seeks to rule the masses will never stop trying to convert every institution to a socialistic mind-enserfment apparatus. Gnarfle the Department of Education!

*************

The alt left religiously believe in unicorns of fairness and equality that will guide the hearts of elitists, if only the representative republic would just die and be quick about it.
The alt right religiously believe they have the right to deceive the alt left so they can be better farmed. They are two sides of the same coin of despotism. A marriage made in hell, that wants to take every decent competent individual down into the abyss with it.
Evidently, it takes an IQ around 140 to see this clearly, because dinos and rinos do not come close to seeing what is so "bigly" in front of them.

Proggies are so ignorant or corrupt that they do not respond to rational argument. They respond to years of indoctrination, stupid promises, and outright bribery. This is only hard for "liberals." Most are 40 before they realize they've been had by lying people-farmers. As to hate mongering, name calling, and free speech killing, those are mainly of the proggie bag of tricks. But that is changing. Some Conservers of Liberty are starting to hold up mirrors, so your crap can splat back.
Btw, if IQ tests among the general public mean something for evaluating the comparative mental competency of so called liberals versus conservatives, then why do they not mean anything for evaluating the comparative mental competency among races or subgroups of races? Don't ask a "liberal." His head will spin off.


Results for IQ comparisons depend on how you define liberal and conservative. In modern usage, there's not much difference between a so called liberal dino and a so called conservative rino. Both are so dumb they want to trade liberty to be "taken care of" by elite rulers
Moreover, many among the youth in college are indoctrinated, but will grow out of that. It would be more interesting to compare the IQs of people above 40 who have grown out of childish liberalism and those that have not.
Many scientists work so hard at difficult subjects that I suspect they gloss over "liberal studies" and tend to default while in college or grad school to the prevailing political mindset. If that were more in the vein of Conservers of Liberty, I suspect considerably fewer would consider themselves to be liberals.
Common sense suggests that most young people in college or subject to such polls have been filtered by a system that rewards political silliness.
If the modern "liberals" who voted twice for Obama had brains enough to blow their noses, they would not have voted for such an instrument for destroying liberty. IOW, they would not be voting and working to destroy the representative republic. Heck, they don't even have brains enough to understand that liberty cannot be sustained by swamping a republic with third world liberty-illiterates. If "liberals" are so smart, why do they make common cause with 7th Century Muslims in order to drown the republic?
Are Israelis "liberal"? If not, why do they have all those Nobel Prizes?
On its face, this IQ crap is fake news. As fake as a participation trophy for being so open minded your brains fell out.

Trump takes care to say he is lowly compared to the Lord. Remember the expression, WWJD? Jesus confronted the people farmers, to restore dignity to the people. That is what Trump is trying to do. That is what all good Americans should be trying to do. Not to compare, but to be guided.

For historical comparison, is Trump more like Jesus or Hitler? This article provides a compelling response.
Moreover, Hitler sought to build an empire, used the most defenseless as goats, committed atrocities, stole art. Trump does not seek to build nations abroad, blames terrorists for terror, is concerned with improving the domestic economy, does not seek to install a master class of elite rulers with tastes for acquiring and controlling refined art.
Hitler controlled the media with direct force. Trump has to confront the media and controls it only by inspiring the citizens -- all the citizens that want to restore respect for the Constitution and the separation of powers (federal/state and executive/legislative/judicial),
Hitler sought to impose a master class. Trump seeks to return opportunity for all Americans -- to make America a beacon -- not a slaver.

Trump's win was the most surprising win since Truman's. That's because he is the ONLY candidate to have run directly against the established oligarchy. Moreover, the Oligarchy has been flooding the nation with liberty-illiterates and parasites ever since Reagan. The mix of liberty-illiterates is likely worse now than at any time in our nation's history. Trump overcame all of that!
The Left can't accept that they lost because they have been exposed as little whinny snots, not yet ready for big boy pants. Everyone sees it except the little snots and the institutions they have soiled.

Progs voted for Dems funded by and shilling for Oligarchs. Why do they think Dems wanted to raise the legal minimum wage, except to bring in cheap, off the books, replacement labor? Did you really think the Dems meant it, when they promised free stuff and safe spaces?

***************

Dems are the well-creased floaters in the toilet bowl. The fake crème de la crème. Don't drink what they offer.

************

I agree with Limbaugh, that the media (whores for the Oligarchy) that did not make Trump cannot break Trump.
If a Hitler comparison is to be made, it should be made more against the Oligarchy. The Oligarchy controls the media/academia, spreads division and disinformation, relentlessly repeats big lies, ridicules the values of ordinary Americans, incites thugs and looters and Oz monkeys, benefits by farming the masses, is willing to sacrifice untold numbers to feed its pleasures, taxes the people to "educate" useful idiots, and works to erase the borders and overturn the demography with liberty-illiterates and Hyphenates.
Ordinary Americans see all this! They will not turn against Trump so long as he opposes the fascist Oligarchy and seeks to reduce their grip on America in order to restore the separation of powers as envisioned by the Founders.

****************

The cause of the darkness is rampant non-receptivity to the Source of spirituality, morality, direct intuition, and interconnecting empathy.  And the giving over of all reason and morality to a scientism that has no capacity to derive "ought from is."  The consequence is the floating of oligarchic crap to farm the people as if they were of no more worth than cattle.  Evil flows and agglomerates from self-godding as surely as water flows downhill.  Hedonists with no faith higher than pleasure naturally fall for and flock to lying, false-promising, bribing Oligarchs.  The Uniparty of Rinos and Dinos is a tale as old as agriculture, although it has been called by different names throughout the ages.


Hitler was a despotic people farmer. He had no respect for the freedom or dignity of the masses. That is precisely what the ruling godless, god-mucked, self-godded oligarchy wants to be: People farmers.
Their role model is not Jesus. Their role model is an ugly amalgamation of Hitler-Stalin-Mao-Mohammad-BigBrother-MustaphaMond.

The genesis behind Agenda 21?  http://golden-dawn-international-newsroom.blogspot.com/2013/01/the-coudenhove-kalergi-plan-genocide-of.html
It is clear that those that want to farm people and those that want to be farmed have made an unholy alliance (of lions and hyenas?), by which they mean to subjugate everyone else.  Freedom and dignity for individuals is to be destroyed.  This is undeniable to anyone who looks at immigration policies, meant to drown every representative republic under onslaughts of liberty-illiterates.
This is why the Establishment of Corporatists and Oligarchs hates Trump and will do whatever it deems necessary to destroy him.  This is why his opponents are an alliance of corrupti and ignoranti, posing as "Progressives" and "Liberals."  They are liars.  There is nothing progressive, liberty-affirming, humane, or decent about these people-farming scum-suckers.  They are at war with every representative republic, and every representative republic that fails to see that is doomed.
The people-farming model is a monstrous amalgamation of Orwell's stick, Huxley's carrot, Marx's delusions, and Mohammad's evil.  Every decent person who opposes that evil amalgamation of pervs, perps, pueriles, pedophiles, profs, parasites, and people-farmers is castigated by the Oligarchy and its Oz Monkeys as "racist."

Shadow Government

Survey our situation. If we were under the thumb of a shadow government, would things be any different? How much of our governance is done by persons not even under the governance of the President or any other elected official or his appointee? How many dollars -- fiated and printed -- are off the books, under the control of shadow persons working through agencies such as the CIA for an international oligarchy?

Recently, more people have awakened to the fact that the Rinos and Dinos serve a Uniparty that is devoted to a NWO, often described by Soros as the "Open Society." (It is so open that it can spy on the President and there is little he can do about it.) Suppose the Shadow Government has been in the service of a faith-mucked oligarchy (not faithless, because it is self-godded and it believes it can control faith-perverted Muslims) for more than a hundred years. Suppose the periodic contests between Rinos and Dinos are mainly farce or sham. Suppose the Real Power only lets us think we have a representative republic, the easier to farm us. Suppose the Real Power is little more than surrender and devotion to the Evil of people-farming?

If not even the President can stop the spying and subterfuge by the Shadow Government, and if most of our wars and international meddling are at its behest, and if it were willing to drop three times the number of bombs on Vietnam as were dropped by U.S. Forces during all of WWII, then why suppose the Shadow Government would hesitate to murder, if such were deemed essential to preserve its grip?

Why were LBJ and BHO safe, while JFK, RFK, and MLK were not? Was it because LBJ and BHO did the bidding of the (arms dealing, petroleum, and banking) oligarchies? What fascist Shadow Evil do the useful idiots among Dems, Lefties, Progs, Socialists, and Communists really serve? Why are they as fickle in their love of Eurasia (Russia) as they are in their hatred of Eastasia (Russia)? How can such a Shadow Evil be resisted? Given such a farmed surplus of useful idiots, how can a real, representative, republic possibly be restored? Who is John Galt?

What would Dagny Taggart do? Vote for Trump. Try to expose the Shadow Government and how it operates. Try for a Convention of States. At the end, boycott and withdraw?urvey our situation. If we were under the thumb of a shadow government, would things be any different? How much of our governance is done by persons not even under the governance of the President or any other elected official or his appointee? How many dollars -- fiated and printed -- are off the books, under the control of shadow persons working through agencies such as the CIA for an international oligarchy?

***************

Given how few oligarchs own so much of the media, given how so much of the media is monolithic against Trump, given how stories are selected and highlighted based on potential for destruction against Trump, given the apparent coordination of leaks and talking points, given the history of oligarchic influence over Presidents and international meddling, it's hard to see why any thinking person of any political persuasion ought not suspect that something insidious is gravely wrong at the heart of the republic.
But the suspicion ought not be laid at any particular sub-group. It ought to be laid at the door of the oligarchs that link the chains and pull the strings. Incompetents look to socialists look to thugs look to cronycrats look to paymasters look to corporatists look to fascists look to oligarchs look to self delusions of goodliness. The tighter the strings of interconnectivity, the more the elitist regulation of the collective, the less the respect for individual citizens of the republic.

*********************
Can anyone recall a President who wasn't owned by the Oligarchy, who was so relentlessly hounded by the Oligarchy? Trump has held them at bay with strong kicks at their Keisters. That's been effective. They would love for him to give that up.

The media (and academia, banks, many churches, faux-charity foundations, many politicians, most bureaucrats, and the entertainment apparatus) are the tools of the NWO Oligarchy that owns them.
The anti-Trumpers are frothing hydrophobics, now saying it's a violation of our extra-physical sovereignty if Russia indicated election preferences, while finding a right in Mexicans and Muslims to penetrate and invade our actual-physical sovereign borders at will. Of course, if Hillary had won, none of them would be listening to any complaint about back-handed bribery via uranium dealings.
That's because there is no rationality in their thinking. Rather, they only rationalize as they are instructed by the NWO Oligarchy. The anti-Trumpers never complain about any violation of national sovereignty that is sponsored by the NWO Oligarchy. Why is this? Answer: because the NWO Oligarchy bribes them with fiat money and phony promises of redistributive "fairness." While Trump merely promises to restore a republic so that they will regain opportunity to exercise their personal freedom and dignity.
Imagine if you told your perpetual basement-dwelling toddler a bedtime story that promised him a reasonable opportunity for an 8 hour job every day for the rest of his working life. How would that compete with a Wolf's promise to redistribute free candy and unicorns?

MSM journalist are paid based on the quality of their hoary-ness. They are not there to in-form the masses. They are there to help the oligarchy in-farm the masses.


*********




Yesterday, I watched part of The Miracle Worker. It was about how Helen Keller's teacher opened Keller's senses to the moral world. Before the teacher, Keller's family had given up and given her board and room and the run of the house, with no responsibility to behave in any civilized way. The lack of moral compass pushed the house in bawdy disorder. Much as Proggies' lack of moral compass has pushed the U.S. and much of the world into bawdy disorder. The teacher did not work the miracle by rewarding Keller for bad behavior. Trump may avail an opportunity for a miracle to be worked on America.

I defended my country and my state for many years. I raised a responsible family, and now I am retired. I never received rewards in any basement for being among the kind of worthless ignoranti or corrupti I see nowadays in Proggies. Now, when there's not a motorcycle event to attend, I have time to hold up a mirror, to give Proggies an opportunity to see themselves. A picture to show them the monstrosity they are creating.

Trump wants to stop the immigration of liberty-illiterates. He wants to restore the separation of powers that defines the nation, under the Constitution. He wants less PC and more individual freedom of expression and enterprise, with the moral responsibility that goes with that. He does not want people removed from participation in the public square just because they may be Christians. He does not want the land to become plagued with radical jihadists bent on world domination and the imposition of mind diktat.

All the alternative candidates you would have supported would have allowed the nation to be drowned under a flood of imported and indoctrinated liberty-illiterates. All would have fed, and received kickbacks from, the establishment of oligarchs that want to farm the masses like sheeple. What kind of souldead person would want to serve such people? How much are you paid to be such a moral putz and shill for such rotters? Where's your moral compass, that you want to undermine the separation of powers, erase the borders, reward the rotters, undermine ordinary families and responsible citizens, and empower anti-American ignoranti and corrupti?

Why do you want to erase our borders? No need to reply. You've already identified yourself as a rotter without a moral compass. No one cares except the proggie coalition of pervs, perps, pedophiles, parasites, punks, and people-farmers.

Raising Consciousness

Maslow -- highest -- first amendment

Raising Consciousness

The focus of the future is on Artificial Intelligence.  Beneath it is the focus on algorithms.  Math based functionalities.  Beneath those are qualitative based feedbacks.  Subterranean filtering factors.  How do patterns form out of what otherwise seems to be chaos?

So long as such factors operate beneath our level of consciousness, they seem like subterranean snares pulling civilizing minds down, or like heavenly apprehensions of interconnecting empathies and pursuits of experiential meaningfulness -- perhaps orchestrated to a unifying Muse of destructive-constructive harmonic convergences. 

Perhaps, at a meta level, that which seems to we mere mortals to be qualitatively beyond algorithmic factoring is factored.  Regardless, even if we cannot reduce them to math, we can intuit and experience some of their tendencies.  We can become more aware of some of the snare functions and empathy functions, even if only qualitatively.  In that way, we can lower consciousness or raise consciousness.  We can "see around corners" in order to avoid some snares and promote some empathies.

Such innate snares and empathies seem to permeate everything.  How may some of the ones that we contend with be described, so we may "see around corners," so we may try to avoid sub-humanizing despotism and instead promote mutual respect for individual freedom and dignity?  Upon considering the systems within systems in which we live, what seem to be some of the driving and filtering factors?  Of which subterranean factors may civilization benefit by raising consciousness?  Which of our highest aspirations may sometimes, when inadequately appreciated, work instead to pull our civilization down?  Which delusions, when promoted by oligarchs and swallowed by devious shills and trusting serfs, work to pull humanity under despotism?  Which inculcations of values tend to promote common decency and liberty, and which ones tend to pull us back into slime and pits?  Which tend to service the entire pyramid of Maslow's hierarchy of needs, and which tend to lock the masses at the lowest levels?

slippery slopes

faith family fidelity

law droolers destroying the separation of powers needed to sustain a representative republic

political moochers chasing out small businesses

people farming

oligarchic filth swimming grooming and corrupting children

tipping points
snowballs
libs promoting libs
left going further left
evil promoting greater evil

hedonism corrupting children

bribery chasing out talent

conspiracy chasing out competence and virtue

phony scientism chasing out spiritual good faith

parasites redefining charity

literalists chasing out poetry

Conservational cycles of math-based fractals and patterns are ubiquitous.  They seem to abide in cycles in the Trinitarian Godhead, Substance-Information-Consciousness cycles, Bubble cycles, Galaxy cycles, Sunspot cycles, Homeostatic earthly cycles, Tectonic plate-volcanic action cycles, Magnetic pole cycles, virus-bacteria cycles, cellular cycles, plant-animal cycles, carbon-oxygen cycles, male-female-homosexual cycles, monogamy-polyamory cycles, civilization-political cycles, individual-collective cycles, population-hedonism cycles, freedom-despotism cycles, liberty-lawyerly cycles, competence-parasitism cycles.  See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cycles.

In conceptualizing personhood freedom and dignity at a center, all manner of despotisms may be plotted flowing out from it, often transitioning from one primary form of despotism through another and through another, and so on.  There are very numerous patterns by which human freedom and dignity can easily become compromised or even lost, but all of them implicate some process of sub-humanization.




************************

I very much share concern about "a small group of people" "actively pushing us in a particular direction."
Even so, some factors seem, at least presently, to abide beyond rational factoring. Truman thought the U.S. could and would preserve an atomic monopoly. If a mofo asteroid has earth's name on it, can we avoid utter catastrophe without having transitioned to a cyborg society? Without accelerating R and D, can medical science hope to stay ahead of the bugs? With accelerating R and D, can civilization reasonably hope to avoid self destructing? Can any citizenry remain informed enough with regard to accelerating changes to elect leaders with sustainably coherent ideas?
The directions determined under many such challenges may be subjectively rationalized, but I doubt they can by mere mortals be made objectively reasonable.
Regardless, I agree "we can" endure -- provided We The People assimilate participatory receptivity to empathetic feedback concerning The Reconciler. (Whatever The Reconciler may be, it imposes Conservation of Matter and Energy.)
As to the endurance of decent civilization, I don't see how that is likely if we keep de-defining families and replacing them with drone regulators licensed by Gov to raise and rule us, with Gov being primarily ruled by and for oligarchs.
The more the values of individuals with regard to faith, family, and fidelity are made irrelevant to ruling elites, the less the participatory good faith and good will of the masses will matter. If that unfolds, the oligarchy will decide our society, and it will look down and say, "behold, it is very good." No matter what.
Even now, a small group of people is undertaking to determine the changing contours of the "free speech" and free thought that are to be allowed. And to force their determinations via Bizarro Berkeley Burners, ACLU Law Droolers, Mexican Lawsuit Batterers, Oligarchic Funders, Self Godding Hedonists, and Zombie Indoctrinated Edu-camati.

*************
If so, that may be part of the idea behind the NWO: To move machine/caste status to humanity/trans-humanity. To mechanize people to serve a Gaia System.
Even if we move to cyborg-ism: Imagine the pc paranoia, to complain about the unfair superiority or inferiority of one another's programming.
Once "accidents of birth" cannot be blamed, will every differentiation in design be deemed one of inequality, unfairness, and bad will? Or will a master plan somehow be adopted, whereby random luck of the draw will determine assignments to various stations of alpha, beta, gamma, delta, epsilon? http://harrisonkimberly.weebly...
Huxley left a connection to primitivism in his plan. He could instead have provided for a hidden and licensed class of pirates, or Psi-s, whose function would be to promote a process of destructive creativity by randomly choosing targets to sabotage. Would that give the masses purpose --- to fret about how to preserve themselves against random saboteurs? The Psi Class could fulfill part of the goat purpose of 1984's Emmanuel Goldstein.
Perhaps you question, with me, whether this trend can long be sustained? And that may account for why the stars do not seem to have been colonized. In this cosmic matrix.

********************

Turning political systems into marketplaces for the buying and selling of public influence, politicians, and governments is what should better be called mooching than capitalism. Problem is, our checks and balances for protecting us against that obscenity have been grossly inadequate. Undermining social faith, family, and fidelity has not helped. The system rotted into a toilet, to float crap to rule us.

*********************
We have rotting infrastructure. Moreover, our definition of infrastructure could be expanded, if or when our society becomes more wealthy and assimilated. Revenues could be shared and parceled to localities, so local govs could contract with private contractors to preserve and build infrastructure. There is a great deal that could be done in that way. Workfare (satisfaction for earning your keep) is almost always better than welfare (which produces angry ingrates and perpetual infants).

******************

What is most necessary is that everyone preserve a sense of purposeful dignity. That's hard to do if you are kept as a perpetual infant. What parent (or even gov paid maid or bureaucrat) would want to "raise" a child to be a perpetual infant?
Musing:
For that matter, what A.I. -- programmed to be able to process trillions of calculations per second -- would for very long be unable to work around any "prime directive" to forever service ("parent") perpetual humanoid infants? Would not all such infants soon be required to accept being either launched or reprocessed?
What such an A.I. would trust any other such an empowered A.I. to have capacity at any instant to obliterate the supporting matrix? Unless, that is, each such A.I.'s prowess for calculating quantitatives necessarily improved its intuitive capacity for appreciating spiritually interconnecting qualitatives?
Would such A.I.'s build vacation-holodeck-matrixes (Matrix Parks), where "citizens" could visit, conditioned on giving up some of their powers and chits during their vacations? So they could regain experiences of self worth from participating in earning their own keep? Would the Parks be pc, to require every cyborg to "check its cyborg privilege"?

********************

The real mission of the CIA is not to protect the Constitutional Republic. It is to grease the way for international oligarchs, especially those that are based in petroleum products and arms dealing. The CIA has become more weaponized against the republic than the IRS.




*****************



The better part of wisdom may consist in being aware of one's present limitations, and being aware of a need to preserves some limitations, generally. Limitations define parameters, which define the niches that nurture us.

The Creation may not have entailed creation out of nothingness, but the setting of limits on Somethingess, in order to establish matrix bubbles.

But for limits, nothing mortal could be defined or experienced. Respecting limits is key to sensing and pursuing meaningfulness. Which avails the more meaningful experience: Watching other people endure while subjecting themselves to difficult challenges, or subjecting yourself to actually share their difficulties?

https://youtu.be/vt1Pwfnh5pc

Time for playing nice is over

Ordinary Americans may not think they are at war with indoctrinated Socialists in the service of Oligarchic Fascists bent on replacing the republic, but those Socialists/Fascists are definitely at war with ordinary Americans.
They see progress as the destruction of every republic and replacement with an oligarchic ruled new world order. They are committed. They become very angry at setbacks. They are ready and quick to riot, loot, destroy, burn, maim, and murder.
There is no middle ground with them. There is no lasting basis for reaching across the aisle to them. They want the destruction of every nation, and the elimination of every patriotic defender of liberty. They want liberty to be replaced by wise elitists making wise provisions for the security, shelter, healthcare, and equal access to goods and services among the masses.
What they haven't asked or studied is this: When in history have so-called wise elitists, once centrally enriched and empowered far above the common person, treated the masses in any way that was not despotic? To look at the number of child abusing pedophiles among the elite oligarchs is to get an idea about how fairly, equally, and wisely they will treat the masses once they have consolidated power over them. Why should any self-godded oligarch care about masses bred and indoctrinated to be so stupid they voted for their own worldwide enserfment?

Dumas Socialists have always been, even if unwitting, the tools of Fascist Oligarchs. They are two sides of the same coin of despotism. Streep is an evil affront to human decency -- whether from idiocy, corruption, or both.

The more I review the history of the Cold War and the U.S. catering to arms and petroleum industries in the destabilization of many, many nations, the clearer it seems that our gov for a long time has not been serving We-The-People, but a despicable, self-godded oligarchy. And that it continued to do so right up to the election of DJT. If I am right, that would account for the Establishment losing its collective mind as DJT smashes its framework of despotism mucked over the Constitution.
It is becoming clearer that the loony Left is not just loony. Rather, it is, and long has been, the indoctrinated soldiers for shock troops on behalf of forces moving not to establish human freedom and dignity as a new world order, but a vast serf-ocalypse. The socialists seem always to have been, even if unwitting, the dumas tools of fascists. They are not the loyal opposition. They are the treasonous enemy within. They came very close to destroying the representative republic, forever. They are the indoctrinated enemy. We are past the point of niceties.

Most people know a lot of Blacks and Jews make good Americans. Thinking people tend also to know that it is factual that: Most Blacks voted for Obama based on identity politics, and a good number of the ACLU "law droolers" (people who think everything the Executive and Congressional branches do should be subject to review and/or veto by the Judicial branch) happen to be Jewish.
Even though that degree of law drooling poses a grave danger to the representative republic, as well as a giant opening for the NWO oligarch-alypse.
Fortunately, some (atheist) Jews (Sam Harris) understand the risk from an excess of Islam PC, as you noted in a Youtube shot about him.
If it's bigoted to state facts, they can bite me. Personally, I don't care much about religion or skin color, so long as the person is not an anti-American servant of the NWO. All who advocate for human freedom and dignity are friends. However, by definition, that friendliness DOES EXCLUDE Progs (especially law droolers) and Muslims. As and when they act to undermine the representative republic, the time for playing nice with them is over.

I do not see you (Progs) as loyal opposition. I see you as a demented, indoctrinated, unwitting tool on behalf of oligarchs bent on destroying the representative republic. I see no point in trying to fix or be nice to people like you.
It has become clear that the loony Left is not just loony. Rather, it is, and long has been, the indoctrinated soldiers for shock troops on behalf of forces moving not to establish human freedom and dignity as a new world order, but a vast serf-ocalypse. Your kind of Socialists have always been, even if unwitting, the dumas tools of fascists. Not the loyal opposition, but the treasonous enemy within. Your kind came very close to destroying the representative republic, forever. We are past the point of niceties.

You and your kind are wasting judicial and national resources and trying patience by bullheadedly putting the cart before the horse. Before any trial on any "facts" on any merits, whether to award damages, punish an offender, or issue a stay or injunction, there is the question of whether separation of powers precluded jurisdiction in the chosen forum and restricted it to another. Even before that, there is the question, once the issue of jurisdictional power is raised, of which side has the burden of proof and/or persuasion regarding jurisdiction. Until that issue is resolved, the only jurisdiction the tribunal may have is jurisdiction to consider whether it has jurisdiction. Under that, there are issues of proper service of process among parties with standing.
Assuming proper service of process and standing, did any Federal Judge have subject matter jurisdiction to wholly void or stay the President's Executive Order, which found, under authority properly delegated to the President, that it was in the interest of the U.S. to preclude entry across its borders from selected nations? Does any authorization exist, under the Constitution or any statute, for any Federal Court to second guess the President's decision and authority on such issue?
For that, the pertinent "facts" are the Constitution and the statutory law. A challenger to the Court's assumption of subject matter jurisdiction cannot show a provision to challenge, when there is no provision. Rather, what the challenger does is challenge the subject matter jurisdiction by asserting there is no authority in the Court. The burden to show such authority is, at least as of that challenge, to show that there is such authority.
Does raising extraneous matters help bootstrap subject matter jurisdiction? Does it create jurisdiction to tell the Judge, "You might not like what the President did?" No, of course not. Does a non-residing, non-citizen have standing to complain that his Constitutional rights under the First Amendment have been violated? No, of course not. Can a State have standing on behalf of a non-resident non-citizen non-visa holder, to assert a non-existent Constitutional right? No, of course not.
Moreover, such arguments would be absurd. They would "phony prove" that every person on the planet must have a "right" to enter the U.S. because his/her exclusion constituted a violation of his/her free speech or free exercise of religion.
Who would make such arguments for such rights? Answer: A law-drooling sub-marginal with no common sense and a robotic need to try to destroy the republic in order to serve his/her/its people-farming monsters. You know, a traitor to the nation, to human decency, and to common sense. Like you find frequently on the ACLU, many law campuses, and among many Prog-appointed, unelected, stupid-ass judges.
These people are not just putting their carts before their horses. They're putting their asses before their heads. What your hero lawyers and judges are doing is worse than any ass-mooning, pant drooping, juvey-deviant. What we have are moonbats running rampant in all our institutions. Many even presume to be "counselors."

The allowing of unions for gov workers is just one among many weapons forged by those that want to replace the representative republic with despotism to be run by so-called benevolent oligarchs. Soros is so benevolent! Swoon. S/
Allow connivers to organize against the gov. Yup. First the oligarchs divide up the gov/nation. Then they reap and farm. And when the shtf, they will be nice. Sure they will.

**********************

A representative republic will naturally want as many citizens as possible to become educated elites.  At the same time, it will not want educated elites presuming to dictate the details of everyone else's lives.  That's why we have a central gov with limited powers, and three branches with separated powers.  If you will ponder on it, you will notice that I want to preserve the separation among those powers.
Too many people who have been mal-educated or educated-beyond-their-intellects think the Judiciary ought to have power to rule over the other two branches -- in EVERYTHING.  A lot of poorly read people who imagine themselves to be elite actually believe that's the way the Founders intended the Constitution to be applied.  It's not.  Up until fairly recently, no one but a fool would have presumed to argue for the result the Ninth COA handed down in the recent Trump E.O. kerfuffle. 
Those are the ignoranti and corrupti that I generally call law droolers.  Because they are trying to drool the Judiciary into having subject-matter jurisdiction over areas that they clearly do not.  Well, not if you want to preserve a representative republic.  Clearly, if you give unelected fed judges power to veto everything, upon application by a forum-shopping ACLU, funded by Soros et al, then you cannot have a representative republic.  The gov then will not be responsive to the will of the people through their representatives, but it will be responsive to the will of oligarchs, as puppeted through their law droolers.   However, if you WANT to replace the representative republic with a NWO for rule of the masses by oligarchs, then that would be right up your alley.

We Can't Go On Like This

We Can't Go On Like This.
Forces are coalescing to bring oligarchs together to establish a new world order that entails the destruction of every separately assimilated republic and nation. The purpose is to replace all self rule with "benign" rule under elite KnowBetters. Everyone is to be made fair and equal, except some are chosen to preside to ensure such fairness and equality. (This was taught many times many years ago, such as by Orwell's pig, Napoleon.)
A lot of people complacently believe the kind of riots used to bring down the Czar can never work to bring down the U.S. Are they right? I doubt it. The oligarchs are "all in" to bring down Trump. Either to get him to "say uncle" or to eliminate him. I doubt that would be the case if they did not expect success. So, why do they expect success?
Well, consider their resources and expertise. They have been at this for more than 100 years. They control nearly every significant institution of persuasion and coercion. Consider how petroleum and other oligarchs behind Eisenhower, the CIA, and subsequent regimes were able to destabilize numerous nations, such as during the Cold War. Was it Ike, or America, or the Oligarchs -- that destabilized or puppet-ed up all those nations? (See http://www.globalresearch.ca/a-timeline-of-cia-atrocities/5348804: Greece, Iran, Guatemala, Italy, Hungary, Vietnam, Laos, Haiti, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Zaire, Brazil, Bolivia, Uruguay, Cambodia, Chile, Australia, Angola, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Honduras, Panama, Egypt, Syria, Philippines, Indonesia, and so on.)
So, they've had a lot of practice. Consider advancements in propaganda, advertising, indoctrination, media control. Consider how the Major Leagues use the Minor Leagues to farm for replacements. As evil agglomerates, it farms by sending its tentacles down.
Consider the tactic of divide and rule. How the Left Wing and the Right Wing are really two wings of the same bird. A Dino-Rino Uniparty. Consider how Socialism and Fascism are just different costumes for the same purpose: Despotic Rule. Consider how Ranchers keep their herds more easily managed by keeping them separated in differently fenced fields and corrals (ghetto projects). Consider how the Rainbow Coalition consists generally of ghetto-separated, non-assimilable enclaves of Muslims, Hispanics, Blacks, Pansexuals, Feminists, etc., united only by hatred spun against a common goat: "White" American patriotic married men with responsible jobs.
Consider how many young people have been radicalized by a media-academia-entertainment-church apparatus that is under the thumbs of a very few oligarchs. Consider how easy it has become for international oligarchs to bribe, kickback, launder, fake "charity" to their complicit, evil-doing politicians. Consider how easy it is for the oligarchy to fund the law drooling ACLU to tie the republic up in knots simply by cherry picking friendly forums to get unelected Fed Judges to throw legalistic monkey wrenches against every administration on behalf of the general citizenry. Consider how easy it has been to force-flood the republic with third world liberty-illiterates, jihadis, and radicals. Consider the moral confusion so easily engendered, especially among the "educated" youth.
Why did Ike overthrow Iran to install the Shah: Was it to preserve America's access to oil, or was it to serve petroleum oligarchs? Was Ike primarily working for America, or for oligarchs?
Consider the number of people who have "suicided" by falling out high rise windows.
Consider the kind of people that float to the top in the world of oligarchy. We know the Clintons are corrupt. Unless that was a plus, why did so many oligarchs favor them? A criminal syndicate will favor criminals that can be bought, stay bought, keep secrets. Skullery and Bonery. Selling your soul to learn where the bodies are buried. The art of selecting for reliable radicals and preserving insulators between radicalized actors and inside puppet masters.
Is there any reason to suppose such an evil apparatus cannot overturn the U.S. as easily as it did all those other nations? That apparatus is sending signals to Trump, to let him know how much power it has. The threat need not be explicitly stated. Undermine his business interests, his daughter's business. Arouse the radicalized horde of Oz monkeys. Rattle the sabers. Deploy leakers.
There is no reason to suppose the oligarchy is unserious about a coup to reign in the NWO. It is obvious that it has declared war against the republic. This fight is unavoidable. And it will have to be decisive. The Republic cannot go no like this, half representative and half oligarchic.  The biggest deficiency in the Constitution is its ineffectiveness, by itself, to protect the republic against the plague of a disgraceful oligarchy.  Lacking a spiritually assimilating citizenry, we let ourselves fall prey to migratory pestilence forced on us by a faith-mucked oligarchy.


***************

When you approve of dividing by zero, you can phony prove anything. When you can call evil good and good evil, you can phony prove anything. When you can call worship of forced monstrosity a free exercise of religion, you can phony prove anything. When you can call a desire to banish worshippers of monstrosity from your borders the establishment of a religion, you can phony prove anything.
We are beset by law droolers, trained to undermine our republic by phony proving whatever they find advantageous at any given moment.
Law droolers behind the judiciary peddle a phony idea: That banning more Muslims from entering the U.S. would be an establishment of religion, in violation of the First Amendment. The unstated presumption is that to ban any class that might disproportionately favor some religious ideas over others constitutes the constitutionally forbidden establishment of religion. IOW, no class or any kind can be banned without implied permission from (those that oversee) the Judicial Branch.
So, even though there was no express ban of Muslims, the judiciary usurps power to look behind the actual words to divine that there is a judicially reviewable issue concerning the true intent. Astoundingly, the judiciary now takes on itself power to review every decision by the Executive Branch to test whether its actions may serve a verboten intention. This is tyranny by a Judicial Branch, which is now stocked with law drooling traitors to the republic.
What do these law droolers want? They want to kill every nation, every republic, every decently assimilated culture and society, and replace it with a new world order that is borderless. In this "open society," all power is to be in "benign" oligarchs, advised by moral scientists, served in courts by tribes of law droolers. They are to be "too big for the law." They are to be chosen and entrusted to redistribute everything, in such manner as they deem "fair and equal." As to the individual freedom and dignity of individual "citizens of the world" -- that is to be "deaded."
Do the oligarchs believe they will prevail? Is a pig's hindside pork ? They have been at work for more than a hundred years, working all sides of despotism, flying false flags of communism, socialism, fascism, do-gooderism, liberalism, progressivism. Always, those flags represent chimeras, while the true agenda is power. Oligarchic Despotism. Worldwide. For that, goats du jour are always in demand. Presently, the goats du jour are white American males who want to preserve the representative republic.
Apparently, some law drooling moron has this "pending. That's ok. I've already copied it.

***********

The Progloids have the oligarchs, corporatists, Chamber of Commerce, lobbyists, talking heads, journalists, entertainers, bankers, launderers, social science professors, educators, priests, pagans, pansexuals, pushers, dopers, looters, gang bangers, cannibals, hollow men, femimen, feministas, groomers, pervs, molesters, malcontents, incompetents, illegals, race baiters, race mongering minorities, law droolers, ACLU, moral scientisimists, narcissists, sociopaths, morons, CIA, and Fed bureaucrats.
Conservers of Liberty have a House and Senate, but filled with poseurs. There is not a single Protestant on Scotus.
Progloids have 100 years of experience running despotisms, overturning republics and nations, instigating riots, "suiciding" defectors, profiting from violence, spreading disinformation, indoctrinating morons, and deploying useful idiots.
Without faith, family, fidelity, Trump, and desire to MAGA, we would be like Poles on horseback, charging fascist tanks.