Monday, February 16, 2009

CONSCIOUSNESS

(click title above)

CONSCIOUSNESS:
.
I intuit perception of space-time occupational exclusivity may have to do with a defining consciousness, holographically resonating in respect of an associated imaging of an algorithmic system. Resonance of pure consciousness may not, itself, occupy space-time. Compressing all representational particles may amount to imaging them as occupying the same point in such a way as no longer to resonate in any separate relation. Ceasing separate resonance, they become perceived to condense to a single point. Ceasing all imaged resonance, they would wink out. Yet, General Consciousness would not wink out.
.
See: http://www.youtube.com/user/Holofractalist.

It is not that consciousness is “in” particles, metals, dirt, rocks, genes, bacteria, ants, plants, or animals. It is that neither is consciousness “in” humans.

Rather, consciousness is in That which synchronizes, among all paths possible, the path chosen for our shared universe, as well as for all perspectives of it.

Consciousness regarding each perspective need not be based on self-awareness, intelligence, or even awake-ness.

Even when based on a human perspective, visual experience is not based on “direct sight” of any actual exterior “thing,” but on collecting information-relaying light-photons, radiating into one's eyes, there to be focused onto a small area, where such information is reassembled and translated, to be interpreted as a picture “in” a small, closed, dark, rectangular area of one's brain.

That is, we do not directly perceive our three (or four) dimensional interpretations of our universe. Rather, each of our dimensional interpretations is intuited, conjoining out of visual experience combined with general tactile experience as each of us experiences moving our bodies in relation to surroundings we perceive to be coordinately changing.

So, the quality of each perspective of consciousness depends on an entire holography that relates to it, encompassing both a recorded history of its interior body (and neural system and brain) and a recorded history of its environmentally exterior relations. Mind consciousness is not confined “in” one’s “physical brain.”

In respect of its holography, each perspective of consciousness need only be receptive to “patterns that seem” to be “in and surrounding” it. That is, each perspective needs to be pattern compatible, pattern reactive, pattern sensate, pattern interpreting, pattern measuring, and pattern recording. (Even if all such particular “patterns” are made to seem “physical” only in secondary derivation of a Holistic Meta-Source that is “intelligently” and artistically applying and directing its Meta-Substance in respect of a system of replicating algorithms, perhaps all built on one relatively simple algorithm.)

Any such pattern that is reactive or sensate may be inanimate, unconscious, subconscious, asleep, awake, self aware, or cunningly intelligent. Regardless, as it seems to manifest and make express its “choices” among all possible parameters, it will suffice to be considered as a “perspective” of a higher, presently-synchronizing Consciousness, just the same.

Much confusion in notions of panpsychism or panentheism may be resolved upon appreciating that each particular perspective of consciousness is not “in” anything that is “physical” or purely natural. Rather, Consciousness is fused, holistically and holographically, throughout whatever may be the character of our universe for synchronizing choices from among alternative potential paths or parameters for what we experience as our “physical universe.”

Each human perspective of Consciousness merely interprets its self-awareness as if such arose “within” his or her “physical body.” In respect of a deeper reality, each self-aware (“as-if”) experience of perspective is for the entertainment of Something going on about ourselves that is ever so much more powerful.

In that respect, each perspective, on some level of Consciousness, may comprehend, appreciate, intuit, or instinctively feel, a spiritual basis for inspiring artistically-shared, morally-resonating empathies with all others.

****
Interpenetration of Consciousness:

The math functions by which are defined such particular and measurable aspects of quanta as we experience in our here and now would not translate presentations to our fuzzy, changing, limited, holographic perspectives were such functions not Consciously being imaged at a meta-level, by Holistic Mind of God.

Source of Fuzziness:

But for such Meta-Consciousness, I intuit no other agency that could effect real choices among our myriad of possible parameters, either at the level of the particular or at the level of the whole. Our fuzzy logic and perceptions, especially near indefinite edges of our holographic translations, may be artifacts of the meta-math of the Holism, representing infinity and eternity in perpetual now-ness. Fuzziness may be byproduct of illusion, whereby we seem to be effecting choices and decisons from our own perspectives, whereas really we are just experiencing decisions of the synchronizing Meta-Source, functioning as our separately compartmentalized perspectives. But for the fuzziness imposed as byproduct of compartmentalized perspective, we would, as William Blake intuited, perceive infinity and eternity as God does.

****
FUZZILY-VIBRATING REFLECTIVE-REPRESENTATIONS: Perhaps some Qualia or essential Substance of Meta-Mind, by interacting to image math functions, compartmentalizes Holonic Perspectives or Reflective Representations of ITSELF, for each such Perspective to receive and translate some such math functions AS IF they were frequencies of energy, resonating for each Compartment's interpretation.
If so, each of us is a Holonic Perspective of such Meta-Consciousness.
Perhaps each of us --- by engaing with some such "meta-struggle" to maintain our separate FUZZY integrity as a mathematically-lensed, holographically-representative reflection of the Whole --- thereby translates or interprets some sort of RESONATING VIBRATION, energy field, or ground of mortal being. Thereby, each of us acquires a mortal point-of-view relative to a limiting frame-of-reference.

****
PARTICULARIZING IDENTITY:

Self-consciousness of a particular self-identity requires a point of view (POV) and a frame of reference (FOR), for the “self,” on some level, to be aware of its derivative relationship with a Meta-Essence that avails it to have such a POV and FOR.

HOLISTIC IDENTITY (whole-part):

Mortals do not have empirical or mathematical access to Holistic Identity of Consciousness (God).
But, intuitively, for IT (God) to have Identity as a Holism, IT also may, “in some sort of different way,” beyond our comprehension, have a general need to relate to such various particular perspectives as IT avails.
Regardless that ITs essence is not limited to occupy any point in geometry or space-time as we can comprehend, some aspect of its holistic essence may allow IT to preserve or experience qualia of ITSELF from perhaps an infinity of holographically imaged and Compartmentalized perspectives.
Because “physics” does not exist independent in itself, Holistic Identity would seem to relate to particular “parts” or “aspects” of ITSELF by leveraging images of math, thereby somehow compartmentalizing perspective of points of view as relating to frames of reference.
Perhaps this process avails God of some sense of God-self.

CENTRALITY OF PERSPECTIVES:

No perspective, while entirely defined or limited to one universe, is allowed to peer beyond or outside the space-time of such universal holography.
Rather, every perspective is limited to perceive the holography of space-time that is assigned to the limits of his life-path.
He is required to perceive his space-time as being all around him, as far as he can detect, in all directions.
The light by which he perceives and receives information cannot by him be experienced as traversing outside his space-time.
This is because space-time is not in itself real, independent of perspective.
Rather, wherever one goes, there goes also the entire holography in respect of which one’s perceptions are related and defined.
Were it otherwise, a mortal, in “seeing” the edge of his universe, would directly perceive the trick of God, i.e., God imaging meta-algorithms.
In a way of thinking, in respect of centrality of perspective, Copernicus’ notion of centrality was incomplete.

HEIRARCHY OF HOLONS:

I believe there subsists a hierarchy of superior and inferior holons (particular “wholes-parts”), radiating fractals, frames of reference, and points of view. (Perhaps even a hierarchy of “Elohim.”)

For example, myself and another holon-perspective may overlap to share most of our perceptions in common. The holon-holography that encompasses both of our perspectives may be thought, in some respects, as a step up in the hierarchy. For a step down, there may be “bugs” that inhabit many of my pores, some of them perhaps sharing considerably overlapping “perspectives.” And so on.

Mathematical Information and sensory stimuli that come within a particular holon’s field of experience may be mainly limited to that field. Or, it may overlap to be shared horizontally, among other perspectives approximating the same level. Or, the information may be of a type that radiates up and down, vertically, through various levels. In any event, information will tend to be defined and limited among levels and layers of holons that happen to resonate to be receptive to record or sense such information. At edges, such resonance of information may be “fuzzy.” Such FUZZINESS may be secondary to a perspective’s attempts to preserve its separately compartmentalized integrity, to keep its perspective central, notwithstanding that there is no “real” physical geometry or central locus in space-time, to "re-normalize" its informational receptivity to its own sense of centrality.

Thus, perspectives of consciousness and levels of receptivity for Patterns Of Information are Compartmentalized, so that each compartment of perception may receive information not necessarily received or interpreted by many others, if any.

Thus, there is a hierarchy of perspectives of consciousness and of recognition of patterns, even though such hierarchy may flux, change, overlap, and fuzz. Such hierarchy, as interpreted to consciousness, is byproduct of a Holism (God), imaging, compartmentalizing, leveraging, and interacting with math functions at a meta level.

Some informational relations (speed of light, acceleration due to gravity, etc.) seem to be experienced as constants, relative to perspectives, even across mathematically-based vertical and horizontal levels and compartments of consciousness.

Other information-packets may “exist” only to the resonance of perspectives adapted to receive them.

None of such information is based on any “really physical” particles of geometry of space-time.

Rather, all such information is derivative of a Meta-Source imaging a hierarchical build up of algorithms functioning with algorithms functioning with more algorithms, all across various vertical and horizontal levels of interaction with some essential “Substance” (which we do not perceive) of the Meta-source.

COMPARTMENTALIZATION OF HOLONS AND PATTERN RECOGNITION:

An observer may only experience two patterns as interacting with one another when the algorithmic functions of which both are derivative have become joined with a present holography for being experienced as that part of a meta-mind wave of which the observer is derivative.

The patterns do not exist as such, in themselves, but only in derivative relation to an observer. To be perceived as interacting, merging, or collapsing, the patterns must first be perceived as part of the observer’s holography.

To the extent one of the patterns were derivative of an algorithmic function which was not part of any meta-mind wave of which the observer was derivative would be for such pattern to remain irrelevant to such observer.

This is not to say that such pattern may not remain relevant to some other observer. And if such other observer were simultaneously interacting with the first observer, then, at least indirectly, the two patterns would have overlapped in their holographic influence.

Note that neither observer’s capacity to observe would be entirely derivative of any mere system of algorithmic functions. Rather, the algorithmic functions would have no existential effect were they not availed such effect in association with the meta-mind wave of an imaging meta-consciousness.

Except to the extent patterns are sensed as such, within some level of shared holography, they would have no more capacity to be perceived as identifying, interacting, or recognizing themselves as existential patterns than would two abstract numbers, being simultaneously imaged in one’s mind.

This is not to say that two inanimate asteroids could not collapse or collide unless some mortal perspective were there to sense it. Rather, information regarding a collision could be preserved or recorded for later “reading,” in respect of, or to the extent that, there is always some potential level of shared holography, even if only at a level of Holistic Meta Mind.

Or, each asteroid may remain virtually non-interactive with space-time of the other, each being subject to perception or influence relative to a perspective of consciousness that is beyond experiential Resonance of the other.

Or, the asteroids may remain mutually non-interactive to the extent each remains derivative of a virtually separate Universal system for defining or imaging algorithms.

AMBIGUITY OF “THE HARD PROBLEM” OF CONSCIOUSNESS:

Is “the hard problem” to learn how unconscious physics generates epiphenomena of consciousness?
Or, is “the hard problem” to learn how consciousness generates epiphenomena of physics?
Answer? Higher Consciousness imaging meta-math generates and compartmentalizes holographic perspectives of consciousness, for enjoying derivative illusions of physics.
(Next Problem: To what limits may we understand and manipulate our experiences of (illusory) physics?)

PURPOSE OF META-CONSCIOUSNESS:

God is self defining. Math is limited only in respect of logic. God seeks and values perspectives for appreciating His/Her purposes and limits.

May Holistic God eventually teach or avail particular perspectives to a possibility, by leveraging mathematically polarized simulations, to “jump” or phase shift in empathies and points of view from and among otherwise independent frames of holographic, virtual, or universal reference?

AUGURING:

May my conceptualizing of ideas on this website augur that other perspectives, empathetic of the same Source, as myself, are similarly conceptualizing ….? Where are they? How do I find them?
.
CONSCIOUSNESS:
Metaphysics --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-v-UJvx32NU&feature=related.

Math is the real world --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFRTgr7MfWw&feature=related.

Enigma of Numbers --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K4NPQE8ONw.

Self similar replication of numbers and fractal geometry; sentient living cells --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GaB1VMAXPQ&feature=related.

Self organizing emergent evolving complexity out of apparent “randomness” --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeKWDOJvK2o&feature=related.

Symmetrical patterns in nature --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGKLZ3NO9Qk&feature=related.

Design of bacteria flagellum (irreducible complexity vs. parts having functions of their own; building functions on top of functions) --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-j5kKSk_6U; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hW7ddJOWko.

Mathematics of evolutionary game strategies --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxU3WMYMb2w&feature=related.

Random Mutations --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGaUEAkqhMY&feature=related.

Patterns --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3g3uIIg2SoY.

Fractals --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qB8m85p7GsU.

Psychic Phenomena --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9aNl0J8-lo&feature=related.

Invisible Force --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xYOfWUzblQ&feature=related.

The Implicate Order (Order within Chaos) --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c1qvkOube4&feature=related.

Holographic Consciousness (Collective Resonance) --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ih3RoDASkw&feature=related.

Global workspace of consciousness --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aw9Jo5qNCsQ&feature=related.

Holographic Universe --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnvM_YAwX4I&feature=related.

The Measurement Problem --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dpRPTwsKJs&feature=related.

Thought frequency and resonance; all energy has a vibration; everything is vibrational translation and interpretation; every thought has a frequency --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eDqDcZm9EA&feature=related.

Quantum physics and consciousness; pure abstract potential and resonance --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqJOIQWkfWA&feature=related.

Consciousness is in everything; everything is in consciousness; lag time between decision and consciousness; how does consciousness turn experience into illusion of matter (the inverse of “the hard question”) --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKryvqiOFNs&feature=related.

Infinite consciousness living in holographic perspectives --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgeTPubpE8s&feature=related.

Qualia of consciousness --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTWmTJALe1w&feature=related.

Science of hard question of consciousness; neural correlates of consciousness --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eX8xtUORDh4&feature=related.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/02/altruism_the_most_profitable_g.html:

Is it necessary or only helpful, to posit a spiritual basis for morality?

Apart from civilizing function, altruism based on tribes --- atheists may posit --- necessarily arose among humans because humans otherwise would have been too weak and vulnerable to have survived, especially given our long periods of dependent infancy. Over time, such inter-dependency on tribal-based altruism would necessarily have “hardwired” us with altruism, both in our genes and in our tribal cultures. Thus, for tribal based altruism, atheists posit no need for any notion of God.

But, what of civilization-based or national-based altruism? After all, altruistically based customs for sustaining a clan or tribe against competing tribes may not function well to sustain the synthesis of a nation out of a cluster of tribes. Nor would customs for enhancing loyalties to a nation necessarily sustain loyalties to its tribes.

Regardless, how may altruism be sustained among citizens of a nation (or world), once vulnerabilities to predators and opposing tribes are vanquished? How may a nation convincingly harness altruism for facilitating and leveraging science, business, economics, and entertainments? Upon what convincing or non-arbitrary basis may a populace be indoctrinated or educated, regarding customs meant to condition them to an assimilating and empathetic sense of altruism?

For such indoctrination, most atheists would have reliance only upon the State, i.e., arbitrary “Big Brother” like indoctrination. Historically, this sort of reliance has shown itself inclined towards marked abuse.

On the other hand, believers in God, for such indoctrination, could underpin mores-of-empathy, based on a notion of common spiritual unity under God. This would be reinforced in a variety of locally based churches, each cross-sharing a good number of common religious memes.

In other words, a notion of altruism based purely on Nature, independent of God, is insufficiently inspiring for a worthy or viable civilization. That is, if we wish not to fall into State fascism or totalitarianism.

Anonymous said...

CONCEPTUALIZING ---- MYTH MAKING AND JOSEPH CAMPBELL; INTELLECTUAL INTERPRETATIONS OF HINDUISM; VEDANTI:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfN3BKkWW8k&feature=related

REFLEXIVE UNIVERSE:
Holonic Functions --- Holons nesting in a Holarchy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUXkKZsDChY

SPIRITUALITY:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUNlpyfT2LU

METAPHYSICS:
Seeking Coherence regarding the non-trivially Non-Verifiable:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wv67x1GP2w4&feature=related; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXJPEwa4wl0

So many people seem to assume there is a clear way to distinguish ideas about metaphysics (supernatural and intuitive) from ideas about physics (nature and empiricism).

But who, if anyone, has produced a clear idea for defining a way or line of distinction, such that most folks would be able to agree to categorize any particular idea as relating either to metaphysics or physics?

In other words, when we use the words “metaphysics” and “physics,” how much of a clue do we have about what we are talking about?

****

Kant Metaphysics:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wv67x1GP2w4&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVrUxWGm7VI
Can you coherently explain anything that is not trivial that is physical but also not metaphysical?
Apart from one’s conscious and regressive attempts to ideate or conceptualize classifications and categories of metaphysics and physics, do such concepts actually apply to any real ideas or physical things?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfd7-s_XuSY&feature=related

****

Altruism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-O-UJmbLo8&feature=related
Game theory: By strategies of rationally directed work and emotional investment, what is IT that we are seeking? Is IT materially selfish balms or is IT empathetically spiritual balms? Are we seeking IT, or are we merely experiencing rationalizations in respect of IT, being synchronously made by homunculus’ “all the way down”? Are we playing ego games, or merely experiencing synchronized rationalizations of ego games?

****

ART, SCIENCE, SPIRITUALITY:
Limits of Rationality and Rationalization
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsmD2ujZiRo;
http://www.princeton.edu/~smeunier/JonesBounded1.pdf

****

Gnostic Blake --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7EM6KUdAU0&feature=related; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJu9dX5bzPk; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkt2asdpUeE&feature=related
Art of William Blake --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHZB1v77egE&feature=related; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWJbKVNuoXI&feature=related
Blake and Paine --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tikLELXGoWU

****

CONSCIOUSNESS, METAPHYSICS, MATH, NATURE, EVOLUTION, POLITICAL BASIS OF CIVILIZATION:


DEFINITION OF SCIENCE; HOW VS. WHY; UNITY OF KNOWLEDGE --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Uqxxbx2VOs;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1tfWtCZB_A&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUQEVQBOj60;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xP_keLq80eI&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=felD_9DBL20&feature=related


EMPTY SPACE?
Geometrical patterns in space --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ndekw22syko
Wave Structure of Matter; Standing Wave ---
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_wave;
http://www.spaceandmotion.com/wikipedia/wave-structure-matter.htm:
“… the view that what we observe as large-scale matter (discrete and particle-like), is only the 'appearance' (schaumkommen) of wave structures in space. Since 1985, Milo Wolff and others have found a mathematical basis of Wave Structures. The theory is based upon a wave medium in all space of the universe that has the dimension of energy/volume.
….
What we observe as material bodies and forces are nothing but shapes and variations in the structure of space.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ekp1OKi6e4o
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BTcmuGdLCU&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1tkM_f5B9s&feature=related


Metaphysics --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-v-UJvx32NU&feature=related

Math is the real world --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFRTgr7MfWw&feature=related

Enigma of Numbers --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K4NPQE8ONw

Self similar replication of numbers and fractal geometry; sentient living cells --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GaB1VMAXPQ&feature=related

Self organizing emergent evolving complexity out of apparent “randomness” --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeKWDOJvK2o&feature=related

Symmetrical patterns in nature --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGKLZ3NO9Qk&feature=related

Design of bacteria flagellum (irreducible complexity vs. parts having functions of their own; building functions on top of functions) --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-j5kKSk_6U; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hW7ddJOWko

Mathematics of evolutionary game strategies --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxU3WMYMb2w&feature=related

Random Mutations --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGaUEAkqhMY&feature=related

Patterns --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3g3uIIg2SoY

Fractals --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qB8m85p7GsU

Psychic Phenomena --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9aNl0J8-lo&feature=related

Quantum vacuum flux and tapping zero point energy --- ????

Invisible Force --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xYOfWUzblQ&feature=related

The Implicate Order (Order within Chaos) --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c1qvkOube4&feature=related

Holographic Consciousness (Collective Resonance) --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ih3RoDASkw&feature=related

Global workspace of consciousness --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aw9Jo5qNCsQ&feature=related

Holographic Universe --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnvM_YAwX4I&feature=related

The Measurement Problem --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dpRPTwsKJs&feature=related

Thought frequency and resonance; all energy has a vibration; everything is vibrational translation and interpretation; every thought has a frequency --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2eDqDcZm9EA&feature=related

Quantum physics and consciousness; pure abstract potential and resonance --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqJOIQWkfWA&feature=related

Consciousness is in everything; everything is in consciousness; lag time between decision and consciousness; how does consciousness turn experience into illusion of matter (the inverse of “the hard question”) --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKryvqiOFNs&feature=related

Infinite consciousness living in holographic perspectives --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgeTPubpE8s&feature=related

Qualia of consciousness --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTWmTJALe1w&feature=related

Science of hard question of consciousness; neural correlates of consciousness --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eX8xtUORDh4&feature=related

****

EVOLUTION:
Missing Link --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6DkH9BD8jk; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjUQSGWBOSs&feature=related
Frankenstein Quality of Sentient Evolution --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnKY0Kh8jwA

****

POLITICS:
Socialist Servitude --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7_YFKyhQMI&feature=related

Opportunity for Responsibility; Fairness and Meritocracy; Trans-Rational Spirituality; “I Am’Ness”; Integration of Truths --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQRUu_4W2j8; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04gdsFt_zDY&feature=related