.
Physics, Prayer, and Prophecy:
Physics:
There is no ontologically objective “universe-in-itself,” whose existence persists regardless of, or apart from, our perspectives of conscious perception, measure, choice, and will.
A rose by any other name is not still a rose-in-itself.
Source of Objective Unity:
The reason our universe presents and functions as if it were, in itself, empirically objective, is because a common Source of Consciousness, God, through each of us, is, always in the present, experiencing variously different perspectives of one consciousness.
Anthropic Principle of Spirituality:
Each of us “just happens” to share, through different perspectives, that one fluxing, overlapping, algorithmically layered presentation of Consciousness.
Objectivity:
I believe, whatever unifies Consciousness, IT cannot be other than synchronous to the present, inasmuch as time, as in the past, is but a stubborn illusion. So long as Consciousness is synchronous, all perspectives of objectivity cannot be other than rationalizeable to its relation.
Objectivity must be synchronized among perspectives of Consciousness in relation to how Consciousness is unified, rather than in how “physics,” as a derivative, is unified. This is why there is no theory of everything by which to unify physics-in-itself. That is, there is no physical objectivity. Rather, there is a Spiritual Source of objectivity among perspectives of Consciousness.
Prayer:
How we perceive, interpret, conceptualize, will, and pray affect our existence, as it presents and interacts with us.
In respect of how our perspectives are separate, no one among mortals completely directs our common illusion (“pragmatic reality”) of an objective universe.
Prophecy:
The consciousness of each of us accords a perspective or channel through which we can, with practiced good faith, become skilled in fractal vision and fractured insight with regard to synchronicity in paths to be taken by the Whole.
.
****
New insights are drawing Empirical Science and Mystical Spirituality closer together, faster than most people realize. A new empathetic awakening may yet conserve many of us from our own divisive and limited wars and class envies.
Gnosticism:
All Nature And Physics Is Math:
Nature is built on fractal matrix geometry (not unlike algorithms built on layers of algorithms)(self reflective programs to write programs to write programs …).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GaB1VMAXPQ;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHBD8pc8XMI&feature=related.
Mathematical Evolution:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfErlA2v4xg&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GaB1VMAXPQ&feature=related.
Creative Adaptive (rather than random) Selection of Consciousness; Evolution Evolving:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-Qus_xGzZg&feature=related
DNA Fractal Rippling within Symphonic Field of Consciousness:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGZYsZ3E6rA;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slrxG8-IvVI;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_Ez8edgbOA&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRN1fsFCRto.
Fractal Holography (thought perceptions are derivative appearances, not real or true being’ness in itself; science is a perceptual enterprise, not a purely objective enterprise; thinking is a projection of illusory appearance, or perspective):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIQYB9I4hDE&feature=related
The Measurement Problem (no electron has independent, “either-or” existence); real effects of conceptual pigeonholes; Source of Illusions; Limited Finite perspective of reality trying to observe and conceptualize the Infinite reality; to create your own reality tunnel is not to create reality in itself; we imagine ourselves:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dpRPTwsKJs&feature=related
We are infinite consciousness trapped while we are living, within a holographic illusion; this world we think is a physical reality is just a mathematically holographic illusion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgeTPubpE8s&feature=related
Morphic Fields and Habits of Nature:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1xj61rMx48;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yl7f6ogV9o8&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoNUpWwpMdE&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQDg8H0gf7E&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLvIdhGSIYE&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf_tSS4v-y8&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXt1sYS4c0o&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ckU14NMFTU&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdkPhcD_I08&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ea6azRvIpLo&feature=related.
Self Organizing Morphic Fields, Morphic Resonance Memory:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBYvhiobtCM&feature=related
NOTE:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/02/predictions_of_hope_and_change.html:
Put aside class wars for a minute.
May not one still reasonably hope that new insights are drawing Empirical Science and Mystical Spirituality closer together, faster than most people realize?
Mainstream quantum physics and membrane biology are becoming as “weird” as oft denigrated New Age and Post Modern Philosophy.
A new sort of AWAKENING, arising from a new and empathetic appreciation or coalition among scientists and spiritualists, may yet conserve many of us from our own divisive and limited wars and class envies.
In that regard, some suggest each one of us must be the change he or she wants to be. (Obama: “We are the change we have been waiting for.”)
But I think more.
I think each of us can, and needs to, envision a world view, whereby a civilization that is friendly to creative expressions of change can be checked, balanced, and preserved within manageable parameters for availing freedom of expression.
In other words, it is NOT ENOUGH that we become child-like citizens, able to live within a LIBERAL civilization that is protected by others.
Rather, we must also become adult citizens, able to draw and enforce the lines and definitions needed to CONSERVE and sustain such a civilization.
It is in moral fiber for doing this hard, adult work that I find Democratic Liberals and Republican Bluebloods so often lacking (or “adolescent”). It is they who must be purged from Congress.
And a rising coalition among scientists and spiritualists of common good will may yet unite and inspire adult Conservatives to that cause.
1 comment:
New insights are drawing Empirical Science and Mystical Spirituality closer together, faster than most people realize. A new empathetic awakening may yet conserve many of us from our own divisive and limited wars and class envies.
Gnosticism:
All Nature And Physics Is Math:
Nature is built on fractal matrix geometry (not unlike algorithms built on layers of algorithms)(self reflective programs to write programs to write programs …).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GaB1VMAXPQ;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHBD8pc8XMI&feature=related.
Mathematical Evolution:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfErlA2v4xg&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GaB1VMAXPQ&feature=related.
Creative Adaptive (rather than random) Selection of Consciousness; Evolution Evolving:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-Qus_xGzZg&feature=related
DNA Fractal Rippling within Symphonic Field of Consciousness:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGZYsZ3E6rA;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slrxG8-IvVI;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_Ez8edgbOA&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRN1fsFCRto.
Fractal Holography (thought perceptions are derivative appearances, not real or true being’ness in itself; science is a perceptual enterprise, not a purely objective enterprise; thinking is a projection of illusory appearance, or perspective):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIQYB9I4hDE&feature=related
The Measurement Problem (no electron has independent, “either-or” existence); real effects of conceptual pigeonholes; Source of Illusions; Limited Finite perspective of reality trying to observe and conceptualize the Infinite reality; to create your own reality tunnel is not to create reality in itself; we imagine ourselves:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dpRPTwsKJs&feature=related
We are infinite consciousness trapped while we are living, within a holographic illusion; this world we think is a physical reality is just a mathematically holographic illusion:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgeTPubpE8s&feature=related
Morphic Fields and Habits of Nature:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1xj61rMx48;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yl7f6ogV9o8&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoNUpWwpMdE&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQDg8H0gf7E&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLvIdhGSIYE&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf_tSS4v-y8&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXt1sYS4c0o&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ckU14NMFTU&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdkPhcD_I08&feature=related;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ea6azRvIpLo&feature=related.
Self Organizing Morphic Fields, Morphic Resonance Memory:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBYvhiobtCM&feature=related
NOTE:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/02/predictions_of_hope_and_change.html:
Put aside class wars for a minute.
May not one still reasonably hope that new insights are drawing Empirical Science and Mystical Spirituality closer together, faster than most people realize?
Mainstream quantum physics and membrane biology are becoming as “weird” as oft denigrated New Age and Post Modern Philosophy.
A new sort of AWAKENING, arising from a new and empathetic appreciation or coalition among scientists and spiritualists, may yet conserve many of us from our own divisive and limited wars and class envies.
In that regard, some suggest each one of us must be the change he or she wants to be. (Obama: “We are the change we have been waiting for.”)
But I think more.
I think each of us can, and needs to, envision a world view, whereby a civilization that is friendly to creative expressions of change can be checked, balanced, and preserved within manageable parameters for availing freedom of expression.
In other words, it is NOT ENOUGH that we become child-like citizens, able to live within a LIBERAL civilization that is protected by others.
Rather, we must also become adult citizens, able to draw and enforce the lines and definitions needed to CONSERVE and sustain such a civilization.
It is in moral fiber for doing this hard, adult work that I find Democratic Liberals and Republican Bluebloods so often lacking (or “adolescent”). It is they who must be purged from Congress.
And a rising coalition among scientists and spiritualists of common good will may yet unite and inspire adult Conservatives to that cause.
*****
Ontology of Consciousness (Field of Consciousness):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6Ew1wepKn8&feature=related
Mysticism:
http://www.experiencefestival.com/mysticism;
http://www.aprildeconick.com/mysticismatrice.html.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mysticism:
Mystics hold that there is a deeper or more fundamental state of existence beneath the observable, day-to day world of phenomena, and that in fact the ordinary world is superficial or epiphenomenal.
….
Mysticisms generally hold to some form of immanence, since their focus on direct realization obviates many concerns about the afterlife, and this often conflicts with conventional religious doctrines.
….
… describing the power of creation inherent in pure desire/unconflicted singlemindedness of will …
… excessive effort in contemplating the impossible leads the initiate to give up the ego pursuit of doing/getting as opposed to the unity experience of being/having …
… describing the return path to the divine through a gradual emptying of earthbound value concepts and subtle internal conflicts …
….
Mysticism is generally considered experiential and holistic, and mystical experiences held to be beyond expression; modern philosophy, psychology, biology and physics being overtly analytical, verbal, and reductionist.
….
Baruch de Spinoza, the 17th c. philosopher, while supporting the new discoveries of science and eschewing traditional Jewish concepts of God and miracles, espoused that Nature/Universe was one holistic reality with the highest virtue - the power inherent in preserving essence (being) or "conatus," and the highest form of knowledge - the intuitive knowing of the Real. These shared understandings occur again and again in the field of philosophy and yet some persist in disparaging the one over the other.
….
… modern physicists now struggle to understand a multiple dimensional reality that mystics' have attempted to describe for millennia. Physicist David Bohm speaking of consciousness expressing itself as matter and/or energy would be completely understood by the mystic, whatever his cultural/religious heritage.
….
… dimensional reality shifts that synchronize with states of consciousness and unconflicted choices.
….
Traditional use of the term ontology makes it a synonym of metaphysics. Prior to Immanuel Kant's theoretical separation of "reality" from the "appearance of reality," with human knowledge limited to the latter, the field of ontology/metaphysics concerned itself with the overall structure or nature of reality.
….
… mystical path has necessarily as its ontological purpose, the discernment between truth and illusion …
….
In the widest sense, mysticism is every guidance to the immediate awareness of that which is not reached by either perception or conception, or generally by any knowledge. The mystic is opposed to the philosopher by the fact that he begins from within, whereas the philosopher begins from without. The mystic starts from his inner, positive, individual experience, in which he finds himself as the eternal and only being, and so on. But nothing of this is communicable except the assertions that we have to accept on his word; consequently he is unable to convince.
Schopenhauer, The World as Will and Representation, Vol. II, Ch. XLVIII.
….
The emphasis that is placed on subjective direct experience of the "divine and otherworldly transcendent goal of unity", makes it highly controversial to individuals who place a greater emphasis on emperical verification of knowledge and truth (such as scientists for example).
….
… Christian mystics would assert that "the Kingdom of Heaven is within” …
….
Those who adopt a phenomenological approach to mysticism believe that an argument can be made for concurrent lines of thought throughout mysticism, regardless of interaction.
….
Ken Wilber: … the stages of transpersonal growth and development are basically the stages of following this observing self to its ultimate abode.
….
Terms descriptive of a desired "afterlife" include Moksha (liberation or release), Heaven (traditionally understood as a gathering place for goodly spirits, near to God and other holy beings), and Nirvana (literally extinguishing of the mental fetters or unbinding of the mind), but in mystical parlance these reference an experience of reality "different from the present here and now." "Afterlife" is not related to an extension of life after physical death, but sought as a direct experience of the perfect, the divine reality in the present life. The goal is generally established through an "accidental" revelatory or miraculous experience such as a dimensional shift between one structure of reality to another. Once this "potentiality" has been experienced/received/observed, understanding how and why it has occurred becomes the goal of the individual and permanently stabilizing this "direct experience of God" is obsessively pursued. Because terms descriptive of the divine "goal" are defined differently - even by individuals within a given religion - and their usage within mysticism is often no less imprecise, it is extremely difficult for anyone, who has not experienced the simultaneity of the "shift in awareness/reality" to translate mystical language in a useful way.
….
If the attempt of religion, philosophy and science to describe reality is comparative to the fable of five blind men attempting to define an elephant by describing its parts, the mystic of every religion and culture sees the elephant despite the individuality of approach and differences in culture and language.
….
Most mystical paths arise in the context of some particular religion but tend to set aside or move beyond these institutional structures, often believing themselves to be following the 'purest' or 'deepest' representations of that faith.
….
Mystical experiences do not guarantee that mystics will be compassionate or moral, nor on the other hand is a mystical state incompatible with being morally concerned with others.
….
It is important to note that many of the self-styled mystical belief systems arising in recent decades essentially differ from mysticism proper in that they rely on the individual seeker's power and will, whereas in the mystic traditions, the states cannot be initiated by the seeker himself, but only by the Ultimate Being. Hence the term mystikos.
****
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acosmism:
ASCOSMISM:
Acosmic monistic spiritual practice emphasises attaining the Absolute through a kind of intellectual or conceptual realisation. This may involve holding the thought that "I am that" (the Absolute), as in the of the Advaita Vedanta school and its recent advocates; or alternatively through a standing back and simply watching the thoughts and sensations arise and pass away; realising all the time that they are not a part of one's true Self. Both these approaches are termed the path of jnana ("knowledge").
Indian philosophies were and are concerned not so much with the manifest reality we see about us, but with the unmanifest Absolute Transcendent. What matters is simply the practical attainment of a state of this universal, transcendent, transpersonal existence. In that state, according to Adi Shankara, there is no difference between Self and God; there is only the Absolute (Brahman).
****
Collective Unconscious/Jung:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-EAv2waXbY&feature=related
****
Randomness:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGaUEAkqhMY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEDYr_fgcP8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aW2GkDkimkE&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAHUFWPgwpc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXz3qu6J6Zg&feature=related
Aside: I do not think cells “have” will. Rather, I think will is indivisible yet finds expressions through perspectives, emerging as acts for manifesting cellular actions (i.e., interactions of matter and energy). In other words, cells do not “have” will; rather will “has” cells. Compare: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ke22OSU0Ztk.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ja0UUKbVlhA&feature=related
****
Evolution:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7gZhksK9Sw&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFPeQW5XLcc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoJbri9Yem0&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wrs3FDiyot4&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JS5TlcRMaFU&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvwhIG2DZyI&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVthBu6zCY0&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2HpiMyDW-g&feature=related
Music:
George Harrison:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3k5Hpa4NVKI&feature=related
Post a Comment