See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carol_Quigley:
"In addition, other secret societies are briefly discussed in Tragedy and Hope, including a consortium of the leaders of the central banks of several countries, who formed the Bank for International Settlements:
The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds' central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups.
....
In 1971, Gary Allen, a spokesman for the John Birch Society, published None Dare Call It Conspiracy, which became a bestseller. Allen cited Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope as an authoritative source on conspiracies throughout his book. Like Skousen, Allen understood the various conspiracies in Quigley’s book to be branches of one large conspiracy, and also connected them to the Bilderbergers and to Richard Nixon. The John Birch Society continues to cite Quigley as a primary source for their view of history."
*****
NOTES: I came across the site shown below, bottom. It posits some interesting ideas. I'm not prepared to say they are wrong. There's an uneasiness building among Tea Partiers, as they sense a masquerade. However, this guy, Griffin, has a quirky background (with laetrile -- see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._Edward_Griffin).
Some of this stuff is laughable. Some seems conspiracy nutty. But some of it leaves me uneasy. After all, why wouldn't a conspiratorial group spread a lot of stories, to make you think they all must be crazy, even though some are not? In that situation, how can one tell the difference, when all the sources of information are beholden to powerful owners?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3V0VTlrCzW8&feature=related.
See http://info-wars.org/2011/04/22/g-edward-griffin-the-collectivist-conspiracy/:
"Carroll Quigley, Georgetown University Professor and mentor to former president Bill Clinton, explained in his books Tragedy and Hope and The Anglo-American Establishment, how the elite maintained a silent dictatorship while fooling people into thinking they had political freedom, by creating squabbles between the two parties in terms of slogans and leadership, while all the time controlling both from the top down and pursuing the same agenda."
"... Republicans and Democrats agree on the most important topics, such as US foreign policy, endless wars in the Middle East, and the dominance of the private banking system over the economy ..."
"Griffin also talks at length on a myriad of other important subjects, such as the move towards a Chinese-style censored Internet, the demonization of the John Birch Society as a racist extremist group, the Hegelian dialectic, the power of tax-exempt foundations and the Council on Foreign Relations, the movement towards world government, and the question of whether the elite are really worried about the growing awareness of their agenda amongst Americans."
********
NOTES: There does seem to be general acknowledgment of a NWO movement, but I doubt it's a NWO dictator movement. Maybe more like a confluent happenstance of smothering brothers. Whatever. To me, it's ominous that both parties are always giving us "choices" among candidates who always perpetuate the decline and absorption of America into a lowest common denominator of collectivist rule. Keeping borders porous; choking energy independence; corrupting currency; breaking the traditional family; training students to accept prevailing media wisdom; etc. I don't know how the dissolving of America could have been brought about any faster, even were there a direct conspiracy.
*****
See http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=19716.
"In addition, other secret societies are briefly discussed in Tragedy and Hope, including a consortium of the leaders of the central banks of several countries, who formed the Bank for International Settlements:
The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds' central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups.
....
In 1971, Gary Allen, a spokesman for the John Birch Society, published None Dare Call It Conspiracy, which became a bestseller. Allen cited Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope as an authoritative source on conspiracies throughout his book. Like Skousen, Allen understood the various conspiracies in Quigley’s book to be branches of one large conspiracy, and also connected them to the Bilderbergers and to Richard Nixon. The John Birch Society continues to cite Quigley as a primary source for their view of history."
*****
NOTES: I came across the site shown below, bottom. It posits some interesting ideas. I'm not prepared to say they are wrong. There's an uneasiness building among Tea Partiers, as they sense a masquerade. However, this guy, Griffin, has a quirky background (with laetrile -- see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._Edward_Griffin).
Some of this stuff is laughable. Some seems conspiracy nutty. But some of it leaves me uneasy. After all, why wouldn't a conspiratorial group spread a lot of stories, to make you think they all must be crazy, even though some are not? In that situation, how can one tell the difference, when all the sources of information are beholden to powerful owners?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3V0VTlrCzW8&feature=related.
See http://info-wars.org/2011/04/22/g-edward-griffin-the-collectivist-conspiracy/:
"Carroll Quigley, Georgetown University Professor and mentor to former president Bill Clinton, explained in his books Tragedy and Hope and The Anglo-American Establishment, how the elite maintained a silent dictatorship while fooling people into thinking they had political freedom, by creating squabbles between the two parties in terms of slogans and leadership, while all the time controlling both from the top down and pursuing the same agenda."
"... Republicans and Democrats agree on the most important topics, such as US foreign policy, endless wars in the Middle East, and the dominance of the private banking system over the economy ..."
"Griffin also talks at length on a myriad of other important subjects, such as the move towards a Chinese-style censored Internet, the demonization of the John Birch Society as a racist extremist group, the Hegelian dialectic, the power of tax-exempt foundations and the Council on Foreign Relations, the movement towards world government, and the question of whether the elite are really worried about the growing awareness of their agenda amongst Americans."
********
NOTES: There does seem to be general acknowledgment of a NWO movement, but I doubt it's a NWO dictator movement. Maybe more like a confluent happenstance of smothering brothers. Whatever. To me, it's ominous that both parties are always giving us "choices" among candidates who always perpetuate the decline and absorption of America into a lowest common denominator of collectivist rule. Keeping borders porous; choking energy independence; corrupting currency; breaking the traditional family; training students to accept prevailing media wisdom; etc. I don't know how the dissolving of America could have been brought about any faster, even were there a direct conspiracy.
*****
See http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=19716.
1 comment:
Regarding the Will to create, organize, serve, and be subjugated to ... platforms of power ... for the individual and vicarious entertainment and expression of consciousness ... and, regarding Consciousness: Maybe IT doesn't always want to be enhanced. Maybe IT often wants more of us to sleep, or for us to be diverted or blended back into inert, pre-set Information ... even though many of us may want to continue to contribute to enhancing IT.
Just because there may abide a capacity to change all Facts that are perceptible does not necessitate that such capacity need abide with any particular perspective of consciousness or locus, independent of the Holism of beingness.
Post a Comment