A lot of folks want to be indoctrinated and engineered socially. The majority has thinking-fatigue. There's just too much, too many distractions, and too many pleasure servings for anyone to want to be bothered about principles or thinking. Unless told what to think by NWO rulers, "The Farmed" have given up on any philosophy or idea to guide them in what they should believe. Should they believe sex and pedophilia for kids is good, bad, or indifferent? They don’t quite know. Should they believe it was wrong for Adrian Lamo to risk Private Manning’s security? Or should they believe it was wrong for Jullian Assange to risk the security of lives and governments that were put to risk by the leaks Assange greased? Those farmed by the NWO have no hope of a consistent philosophy by which to guide what they should believe about who should be rewarded or punished, or what sort of society or governance they should seek. To the modern majority, liberty is about gorging on pleasures.
This is why there is a growing unease in America. Americans are riven between those who cluelessly support, or actually want, a NWO to rule them and tell them what to think, versus those who do not. As things stand, wiki leaks seem most to have hurt competing tentacles of the NWO, but not the NWO process itself. To hurt the NWO process itself would necessitate restoration of America’s independence from The Fed. However, the NWO process has such a death grip against all institutions of liberty, so escape, even if possible, will cost dearly.
Unless tasered or starved, sharks in service of the NWO process will not back off without extracting many pounds of flesh. This will not pass without much gnashing of teeth. The black hole (Fed?) that's draining all but the stoutest of the fortitude and vigilance to defend liberty is not so much a premeditated conspiracy as a hydraulically increasing swirl of consolidation of power. Either way, liberty is all but dead if the challenge is not soon identified. The suction is not diminishing.
5 comments:
What about the Gay Agenda? Why it have to be political? Why do the Feds have to be brought into it? OK, get rid of sodomy crime laws. But why must we then have third graders being indoctrinated with why Johnny has two mommies? In this day and age, without criminal law in support, is there really the need for so much governmental p.c. indoctrination in order to protect against school bullying? Why can't the kids simply be taught not to bully, rather than why they should experiment to discover their true sexual selves? As to the kids given the "there, there" solace and protection from the school, what are they learning in order to be able to look out for themselves once they become independent adults? Well, they aren't. They're learning how to recruit legal process once they graduate from the p.c. school process. As to the bullying concern: If that's the concern, why are teachers instructed to just let high schoolers brawl it out --- even inside the classroom, right in front of their teachers? What about instruction to have teachers recruit other students, to help calm or break those brawls up? Oh yeah. Legal liability. Law --- another out of control institution ... a twisted ball of grunge, circling the drain. Why does it seem that the arguments about liberty are always and only about more porn, sex, and drugs? Why so little concern with preserving the right to think, say, discuss, work, produce, and invent --- even against p.c., speech codes, Marxist unionizing, and groupthink?
At core, liberty lovers compete by trying to teach the electorate to think in a principled way about a framework that is essential to the preservation of liberty. Rinos and Dinos, on the other hand, compete by getting people to salivate about their immediate appetites and pleasures. Thinking is one on one. Inspiration to salivate can be projected by mass media. To sustain a liberty loving electorate, great care is needed in educating and nurturing each new generation. Somehow, in the bustle of enterprise and opening of borders, America lost her corps of thinkers educated beyond their glands. By the time the school of hard knocks is able to fill the blanks back in, we will be far down the road to serfdom. We defended America abroad, militarily. But our vigilance at home failed. And now we will reap what we have allowed our lessers to sow.
Re: " the only thing I want and the only thing I ask of anyone is that I have the same rights that they do"
This kind of statement is a source of much confusion. What does it mean? Does it mean forced equal treatment in every aspect in which gays feel slighted? Well, what group does not from time to time feel slighted? Suppose the government were to get serious and enforce the border, while incomes for ordinary workers continued to stagnant, so that ordinary families were no longer procreating the next generation. Would that mean the government could not incentive families wanting to have more children, because that would infringe on comparative "rights" of gays? Suppose literature classes in schools have kids read traditional stories about American home life. Would that mean the gov must micromanage to ensure all kids are also exposed, in considerable detail, to literature about fringe lifestyles? At what point does exposure become advocacy and conditioning? If failing to expose kids to such information conditions some of them to become bullies, then does it not follow that prompting exposure conditions more kids to adopt lifestyles they otherwise would have successfully avoided? Why are "rights" confused with "equality"? Why is equality of opportunities bad, while equality of outcomes is good? Do we really want an androgenous society of equals? That is hardly possible in practicality. Why should it be an ideal? This fundamental confusion has infested the ACLU, and so it has infested our entire legal structure. Given this state of affairs, it hardly surprises that the top news of the day is often concerned with such "priorities" as whether tax funded schools should be encouraging kids to experiment with sex (and, next, drugs?). Is that all that liberty and "rights" are about --- porn, sex, and drugs?
The NWO is not under control of any particular perspective of consciousness. Rather, it,s more like a Medusa, under control of a false, fluxing consortium of consciousness, expressing itself through multiple competing heads, all trying to guide along a process that is plowing a very deep groove ... using as its plow the Fed, which is being pulled along by competing dogs of hell, attached to numerous harnesses. The yoke of this process destroys meaningful liberty for most individual citizens. America, the last wayward dog, is being strung into this collective. In turn, in place of freedom, Americans will be rewarded with plenty of kinky sex, porn, drugs, noise, legalism, pillage, and violence. On L. Flynt, on K. Jennings, on T. Leary, on Rev. Wright, on M. Moulitsas, on A. Stern, on S. Alinsky, on Cloward, on Piven, on B. Ayers, on Van Jones, on G. Soros, on J. Assange, on N. Awad. Ahhh, the smell of false consciousness in the morning! At least we'll always have the sound and the fury of Andy Kaufman. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BisS5JxeUW0
If Chinese style collectivism is more consistent with one-party, crony-run capitalism than with communism, is anyone allowed to say that to the masses? As the elite Left sees it, the masses are to be kept barefoot, pregnant, uninformed, to believe what they're told to believe, and to learn to like it. Cuz they're, um, smarter
Post a Comment