Moral Equivalence Derivative Of Faux Objective Division By Zero: More and more, adults are being conditioned to subjugate their subjective responsibility to confused suppositions about "pure objectivity of the external community." Absurd formulations are pounded into us, such as: Freedom, Will, and spiritual participation are mere delusions, byproducts of interactions along the unfolding path of a materially exploding universe. Thus, people are nothing more than units of consumption, and consumption by them is to be, and should be, equally and mathematically unitized. All desires are equal in merit, justice, and rightness. In no context does there abide any qualitatively meritorious choice or culture. Desires of conquered cultures to conquer cultures that conquered them are of equal merit in justice and rightness. Desires of slavers, misogynists, and racists are of equal merit with desires of those who seek to establish and preserve cultures that would avail broad freedom of expression and enterprise. To most fairly distribute material consumption, all units of consumption must be zeroed out. Holistic Will, by permanently extinguishing itself, has given us The Won and shown us the way. There is no progress in moral enlightenment, except to maximize present surrender of sense into oblivion of painlessness. A quick, drugged, and painless apocalypse into oblivion is the closest thing to spiritual fulfillment. Thus, Israel must not defend herself, and slavers must be annihilated in equal part with anti-slavers. Matter must be forced to tolerate anti-matter, for all must be annihilated. It's only objectively logical and fair. There is no alternative material exit from having to endure such reasonings of secular and religious nihilists. There is, however, an idealistic exit. Answers come with asking: What is needed in order to facilitate broad respect for freedom of expression and enterprise among responsible adults? When we begin to ask fundamental moral questions, we will begin to coalesce to moral paths. And we will show the exit to The Won.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
From A.T.:
Re: "push these theories to their logical conclusions and show that radical multiculturalism is destructive of the very goals it wishes to affirm"
What you describe is nihilism, which twists everything by proving nothing by dividing and multiplying by zero. It's a philosophy for losers who think they know everything by believing that nothing has significance, but who are too chicken to take their own exit without taking millions as company for the ride. These are the apocalyptics, the comet riders, the eye-poke paraders, and the new utopian changers. By conflating, dividing, and multiplying the non-quantitatively spiritual with the quantitatively material, these people think they can twist, rationalize, and justify just about anything. Somehow, whatever they justify always ends up rationalizing the rule of their race, pecadillos, or mental and moral sloth over the energies of actual workers. The middle class is thus annihilated and the workers who by their ignorance are said to deserve to be ruled are then ruled by the new elite, justified on little more than revenge seeking. These nihilists, racists, bigots, and reparation seekers always ride to power by promising cheap bribes to agitated crowds of callow youth and disillusioned and divided adults. These are the people who twist bigotry by calling those who defend foundational values bigots and phobes. A nation of assimilated borders and institutions can resist tsunamis of nonsense. A nation once reduced to divided and porous sand cannot. At that point, absent a miracle, it's too late to frame the question that would have been answered had it been timely framed: What is needed in order to facilitate broad respect for freedom of expression and enterprise among responsible adults? Because our nation has largely ignored that question, we will not likely answer it in time.
There's propensity to humor minorities' desires to police themselves ... as minorities --- the law of the nation be damned. Race lords grease opportunities to agglomerate influence by defining followers primarily in terms of race, and most citizens play along --- even agreeing that such is Not racist, while claiming that opposition to it Is racist. What race lords want is good; what would assimilate a nation is bad. Thus, brains are upended. Frequent result: Locals celebrate the banishment of mainstream law and order, much as "moderate" Muslims celebrate Islamic "operations." Only Whitey has remained blissfully ignorant to the fact that diversity ("critical race theory") is celebrated among minority opinion leaders only as cover to divide and secure beachheads. Thus, a visionless intelligentsia of useful idiots busily filters and seprates the soil of America into inorganic beachheads of sand. Even as our nation is sold out to despots under slogans of free trade, Americans line up to divvy themselves out to race lords. Blindness is rampant, masquerading as vision. For goodness sakes, our very "news" is delivered to us from persons as thought-challenged as Soledad Obrien! Those who own our institutions for disseminating information "educate" us with unceasing calls to accept collectivization and division into race lords and serfs and to lay aside individual moral responsibility. The new Orwell-ism: Individual moral responsibility is immoral! All for the race! (I.e., the race master.)
The incoherent and hydrophobic FAITH of the Left is in the God of no-god, the conscience of no-conscience, the freedom of no-freedom, the hope of no-hope, and the equal distribution of nihilism of purposefulness, death, and inanimate matter. The greatest pleasure of the Left is quick reduction to a pain-free loss of mind. Problem is, Leftists want to take everyone else with them, as company. The problem for the Non-Left is how to recognize and quarantine the incorrigible Left. This is extremely difficult because the Left, being so practiced in self deceit, makes it child's play to deceive persons who mean well. The Left invites us to argumentations (Stewart, Colbert, Maher, Alinsky, Maddow, Soledad, ad nauseum) that attempt to divide by zero, and we tend too often to accept the invitations. There's little dignity in arguing with mad men, yet, they seem to front most of society's institutions. Why did hardly anyone of influence see this building?
One would be in deep deNile to suggest it takes any less irrational FAITH to believe in the good of states run by statist elites than to believe in a Source of innate empathy among perspectives of consciousness that is on call to all who are receptive. Although I would say that Statism and Islamism are both irrational faiths, I would not characterize them as religions. I would reserve the word "religion" to apply to a belief system a willing adult chooses for himself to respect, as opposed to being forced or threatened. I would make this distinction because I do not believe America's founders intended to establish freedom to practice a "religion" that denied people their right to choose whether to accept it or not as part of their belief system. I can hardly believe the Founders intended we must accord freedom to those who intend to enslave, subjugate, or reduce to dhimminitude all others. For pruposes of Constitutional interpretation, I decline to interpret that Statism or Islam are "religions." Still, they ARE irrational faiths (and they often are evil in their applications).
Post a Comment