.
It's not that "LIFE" can be pieced together merely from dumb matter. It's that dumb matter is not really dumb, nor is matter in itself the superior reality. Dumb matter is simply representively significant of the previously pre-determined. For mortals, there abide several faces or aspects of THE DETERMINED (i.e., the representively significant): (1) the Predetermined (pre-willed), (2) the Randomly determined (hap hazardly willed), and (3) the Contemporaneously determined (contemporaneously willed). These seem to correlate with the pre-appreciated, the randomly appreciated, and the contemporaneously sustained appreciated. What is predetermined are algorithms that seem to define the cone of common experiential parameters with which our identities happen to have bonded. From the perspective of any particular mortal, what seems to be randomly determined are the synchronizing reconciliations of all the appreciative perspectives with which each of us shares our cone of experience. From the perspective of any particular mortal, what is contemporaneously determined are the effects for which power is availed through him to affect. The measurable aspects of my body are not in themselves "life" or even the source or cause of life. They are the significations of consciousness. After such significations have been preset, they are then termed dumb, inanimate Substance. While such significations are presently unfolding along paths that are beyond precise control or prediction, they may to that extent be termed random. As an unfolding path seems to respond to the present will of a contemporaneous observer, it may be considered as being contemporaneously evidentiary of an interested expression and "living" perspective of consciousness. What materialists often have trouble getting their minds around is that what appear to be measurably material causation is SIGNIFICATIVE of a quality of reconciling consciousness, not "the cause" of consciousness. For the preset, the consciousness preceded the signification. For the random, the interests of the various levels and layers of consciousness are reconciled, beyond the capacity of any particular mortal perspective to precisely predict. For the controlled, some perspective of consciousness is contemporaneously willing or affecting the unfolding signification of the control. For every event, whether preset, random, or controlled, CONSCIOUSNESS is necessarily entailed.
.
******************************
.
What temporally CONSERVES our perspectives of Will is the temporally mutual arrangement whereby we BOND to perspectives that share being defined by, and subjugated to, a common CONE (matrix) of mathematical rules and experience. To break that agreement/understanding/arrangement is to “die,” i.e., to depart the avatar that is measurably bonded under that cone. To use that avatar (body) through to its demise is also to undergo the death of such avatar and consequent dis-bonding, whereby the rules for the expression and communication of the avatar will no longer invigorate its use as an avatar.
.
Bodily AVATARS, like all measurable things, do not really exist in themselves. Rather, they are PLACEHOLDERS FOR STORING INFORMATION, communications, and significations among perspectives of consciousness. The measurable things I BELIEVE, and seem to observe, myself to be doing affect how I am capacitated to observe that which others seem to be doing. However, the bodyless Will-Of-The-Subjective-I has no measurable energy or means by which to feed back “to do” (or “CAUSE”) anything, apart from (through the avatar it bonds with) to experience, OBSERVE, and appreciate its doing-ness.
.
Ultimately, measurable things are not what is/are “really” conserved, since things-in-themselves do not really exist. What we observe and measurably represent are RELATIONAL THINGS. So, how is it that our measurements of conversions are observed to follow rules of conservation? The answer must be: Because the meta-method by which we bond to a common cone of experiential signification requires that all measurable communications be OBSERVED and SIGNIFIED to obey shared mathematical rules of conversionary conservation. Ultimately, however, the conservation is not of things, but of means for exchanging INFORMATION and communications, i.e., qualitatively experiential-appreciative feedback.
.
Thus, Will, ultimately, does not “act” on “things.” Will acts with that which avails the signification of things. Will is not the freedom to move things, because things-in-themselves do not really exist, as such. Rather, WILL ABIDES WITH FREEDOM to intend to exchange communications. Ultimately, an individual’s Perspective of Will limits itself in respect of an avatar, with which it remains interested and bonded. The avatar is availed in respect of a common cone of mathematically conserved expression and representation. The cone is availed in respect of feedback between and among individual perspectives of Will and the Field Reconciler of such perspectives of Will. The cosmic cone, being conserved under rules of math, defines parameters for how perspectives of will can use avatars with which they BOND. Being based in math, such avatars are subject to BIVALENT (“if-then”) algorithmic translations. Ultimately, however, Will’s TRIVALENT capacity to bond with avatars is limited only by its capacity to believe, suspend belief, bond, suspend bonding, re-bond, analogize, and leverage if-then-systems of significations — to imagine and inspire wormholes for TRANSCENDING or phasing through The Matrix.
.
Each DIGITIZED SEQUENCE that is appreciated by each perspective within its allowed parameters (“degrees of freedom”) is fed back to the system as a whole, which sequentially and immediately pulls the whole into re-normalized reconciliation. Back and forth. The appearance of delays in effects over distance is secondary to the process of using relative-absolutes to RE-NORMALIZE experiences so they are made rationalize-able to every measuring perspective. Space, time, and space-time are stubborn illusions. Will, both from the perspectives of individual avatars and from the perspective of the reconciling field of the cosmos, functions only in respect of mathematically digitized feedback between the particulars of the system and the whole of the system. No thing-in-itself requires that any vector for such feedback must follow any set or sequential direction. Rather, such feedback operates only in the PERPETUAL PRESENT, the duration of which abides in the quantum expressions and reconciliations of the perspectives of Will and the field of WILL. Our experiences convey meaning, value, and DIRECTION only in how they are apprehended and appreciated by GOD. As we lose appreciation for such God, our basis for rationalizing mores unravels into ir-rationality and a-rationality.
.
Of the inevitability of the signification of Life: Within our Universe, suppose vector of entropy were to push-pull all that is randomly determined and all that is contemporaneously determined into a simpler state whereby every unfolding relationship were predetermined. In that case, it seems Consciousness would have abandoned our Universe. Were Consciousness to abandon our Universe, what then would become of Substance and Information? Would not they "wink out" and become as meaningless as nothingness? In that case, to what state, universe, or cone of shared experiential existence, if any, would Consciousness, Substance, and Information have migrated? As there is "increase" in that share of existentiality which is converted into The Predetermined, what becomes of that which is Randomly determined and that which is determined Contemporaneous with expression of conscious will? Must not they correspondingly and continuously be transitioning, phasing, and transcending towards altered states and Universes? Must not they be creating their own wromholes through which to transcend to, expand into, and bond with ... new phasings and new universes availed via the potentiality of the Beingness of the Cosmos?
.It's not that "LIFE" can be pieced together merely from dumb matter. It's that dumb matter is not really dumb, nor is matter in itself the superior reality. Dumb matter is simply representively significant of the previously pre-determined. For mortals, there abide several faces or aspects of THE DETERMINED (i.e., the representively significant): (1) the Predetermined (pre-willed), (2) the Randomly determined (hap hazardly willed), and (3) the Contemporaneously determined (contemporaneously willed). These seem to correlate with the pre-appreciated, the randomly appreciated, and the contemporaneously sustained appreciated. What is predetermined are algorithms that seem to define the cone of common experiential parameters with which our identities happen to have bonded. From the perspective of any particular mortal, what seems to be randomly determined are the synchronizing reconciliations of all the appreciative perspectives with which each of us shares our cone of experience. From the perspective of any particular mortal, what is contemporaneously determined are the effects for which power is availed through him to affect. The measurable aspects of my body are not in themselves "life" or even the source or cause of life. They are the significations of consciousness. After such significations have been preset, they are then termed dumb, inanimate Substance. While such significations are presently unfolding along paths that are beyond precise control or prediction, they may to that extent be termed random. As an unfolding path seems to respond to the present will of a contemporaneous observer, it may be considered as being contemporaneously evidentiary of an interested expression and "living" perspective of consciousness. What materialists often have trouble getting their minds around is that what appear to be measurably material causation is SIGNIFICATIVE of a quality of reconciling consciousness, not "the cause" of consciousness. For the preset, the consciousness preceded the signification. For the random, the interests of the various levels and layers of consciousness are reconciled, beyond the capacity of any particular mortal perspective to precisely predict. For the controlled, some perspective of consciousness is contemporaneously willing or affecting the unfolding signification of the control. For every event, whether preset, random, or controlled, CONSCIOUSNESS is necessarily entailed.
.
******************************
.
What temporally CONSERVES our perspectives of Will is the temporally mutual arrangement whereby we BOND to perspectives that share being defined by, and subjugated to, a common CONE (matrix) of mathematical rules and experience. To break that agreement/understanding/arrangement is to “die,” i.e., to depart the avatar that is measurably bonded under that cone. To use that avatar (body) through to its demise is also to undergo the death of such avatar and consequent dis-bonding, whereby the rules for the expression and communication of the avatar will no longer invigorate its use as an avatar.
.
Bodily AVATARS, like all measurable things, do not really exist in themselves. Rather, they are PLACEHOLDERS FOR STORING INFORMATION, communications, and significations among perspectives of consciousness. The measurable things I BELIEVE, and seem to observe, myself to be doing affect how I am capacitated to observe that which others seem to be doing. However, the bodyless Will-Of-The-Subjective-I has no measurable energy or means by which to feed back “to do” (or “CAUSE”) anything, apart from (through the avatar it bonds with) to experience, OBSERVE, and appreciate its doing-ness.
.
Ultimately, measurable things are not what is/are “really” conserved, since things-in-themselves do not really exist. What we observe and measurably represent are RELATIONAL THINGS. So, how is it that our measurements of conversions are observed to follow rules of conservation? The answer must be: Because the meta-method by which we bond to a common cone of experiential signification requires that all measurable communications be OBSERVED and SIGNIFIED to obey shared mathematical rules of conversionary conservation. Ultimately, however, the conservation is not of things, but of means for exchanging INFORMATION and communications, i.e., qualitatively experiential-appreciative feedback.
.
Thus, Will, ultimately, does not “act” on “things.” Will acts with that which avails the signification of things. Will is not the freedom to move things, because things-in-themselves do not really exist, as such. Rather, WILL ABIDES WITH FREEDOM to intend to exchange communications. Ultimately, an individual’s Perspective of Will limits itself in respect of an avatar, with which it remains interested and bonded. The avatar is availed in respect of a common cone of mathematically conserved expression and representation. The cone is availed in respect of feedback between and among individual perspectives of Will and the Field Reconciler of such perspectives of Will. The cosmic cone, being conserved under rules of math, defines parameters for how perspectives of will can use avatars with which they BOND. Being based in math, such avatars are subject to BIVALENT (“if-then”) algorithmic translations. Ultimately, however, Will’s TRIVALENT capacity to bond with avatars is limited only by its capacity to believe, suspend belief, bond, suspend bonding, re-bond, analogize, and leverage if-then-systems of significations — to imagine and inspire wormholes for TRANSCENDING or phasing through The Matrix.
.
Each DIGITIZED SEQUENCE that is appreciated by each perspective within its allowed parameters (“degrees of freedom”) is fed back to the system as a whole, which sequentially and immediately pulls the whole into re-normalized reconciliation. Back and forth. The appearance of delays in effects over distance is secondary to the process of using relative-absolutes to RE-NORMALIZE experiences so they are made rationalize-able to every measuring perspective. Space, time, and space-time are stubborn illusions. Will, both from the perspectives of individual avatars and from the perspective of the reconciling field of the cosmos, functions only in respect of mathematically digitized feedback between the particulars of the system and the whole of the system. No thing-in-itself requires that any vector for such feedback must follow any set or sequential direction. Rather, such feedback operates only in the PERPETUAL PRESENT, the duration of which abides in the quantum expressions and reconciliations of the perspectives of Will and the field of WILL. Our experiences convey meaning, value, and DIRECTION only in how they are apprehended and appreciated by GOD. As we lose appreciation for such God, our basis for rationalizing mores unravels into ir-rationality and a-rationality.
.
1 comment:
One can/should love one's country for only so long. When one's country is hijacked to become a command and control center for reducing the middle class of every country so it can be farmed by cronies, then love of a decent God requires that one do what can be done to impede or reverse that hijacking. Once an oasis of God-respecting decency is established, do not trust that such a hard won situation can/should be exported merely by exporting free speech and "free trade," as if they were some kind of absolute religious talismen. Free trade is too often a dog whistle for siphoning money to corrupt regimes to use to infest and buy back our own politicians. Billionaires made rich and powerful by "free trade" are the primary agents now financing and directing the undermining of middle-class America. If not even America can devise a defense against such infestation, then the middle class has been rendered powerless to export anything. In that case, we will find we have reduced ourselves to only that which is to be harvested, so that talk of what "true conservatism" should look like reduces to little more than talk of idle women.
Post a Comment