.
PERPETUAL - INSTANTANEOUS - HALTING:
PERPETUAL - INSTANTANEOUS - HALTING:
.
Intuitive to inside knowledge (or self-evidence), some ASPECT must account for the feedback that is driven by foundational laws of our physics. Such laws must be, and/or have been, (1) pre-configured and conserved, (2) contemporaneously communicated and renormalized, and (3) chaotically coordinated — perpetually and instantaneously, outside of space-time (it’s hard to reason well in the middle of urban noise), synchronously reconciling the eternal present. Determination shows in three faces: the pre-determined, the contemporaneously determined, and the chaotically (randomly) determined.
.
To experience meaningfulness (sequences and segments over time and space), even to bring space-time into relational and relevant existence, one needs a locus of an implicated geometric grid and/or a renormalizing array of mathematics. That is, one needs a trivalent means for bivalently appreciating, affecting, halting, starting, and delaying digital, on-off, if-then, machine-overlapping switches. Such an existent is produced by a qualitatively and trivalently one-of-a-kind (God?), which experiences countless iterative, bivalent representations of itself. Being bivalent, every machined body and representation is inherently mortal, fallible, and incomplete. Logic and math are incomplete for defining or limiting the Trivalent Existent, because IT is the Source for the geometrically bivalent logic and math of space and time and formations and unfoldings thereof.
.
The trivalence of such One of a Kind is self evident in its all-abiding and all-permeating iterations, such as in: Beingness: the ambiguous-the manifest-the potential; Logic and Law: foundational-transitional-subordinate; Math of Sets: whole-sum-parts; Empirical Physics: cosmos-field-particles; Substance and Signification: qualitative-quantitative-transitional; Determination: Pre Determined - Contemporaneously Determined - Chaotically (randomly) Determined; Will: reconciling-collective-individual; Experience: perpetual (existential)-instantaneous (qualitative)- segmentally and haltingly appreciated and processed (quantitative); Companionship and Civilization: government-society-citizens.
.
To experience meaningfulness (sequences and segments over time and space), even to bring space-time into relational and relevant existence, one needs a locus of an implicated geometric grid and/or a renormalizing array of mathematics. That is, one needs a trivalent means for bivalently appreciating, affecting, halting, starting, and delaying digital, on-off, if-then, machine-overlapping switches. Such an existent is produced by a qualitatively and trivalently one-of-a-kind (God?), which experiences countless iterative, bivalent representations of itself. Being bivalent, every machined body and representation is inherently mortal, fallible, and incomplete. Logic and math are incomplete for defining or limiting the Trivalent Existent, because IT is the Source for the geometrically bivalent logic and math of space and time and formations and unfoldings thereof.
.
The trivalence of such One of a Kind is self evident in its all-abiding and all-permeating iterations, such as in: Beingness: the ambiguous-the manifest-the potential; Logic and Law: foundational-transitional-subordinate; Math of Sets: whole-sum-parts; Empirical Physics: cosmos-field-particles; Substance and Signification: qualitative-quantitative-transitional; Determination: Pre Determined - Contemporaneously Determined - Chaotically (randomly) Determined; Will: reconciling-collective-individual; Experience: perpetual (existential)-instantaneous (qualitative)- segmentally and haltingly appreciated and processed (quantitative); Companionship and Civilization: government-society-citizens.
.
THE HALTING PROBLEM: Each bivalent, off-on, if-then, digitally segmented sequence HALTS and delays when and where the "then" part is tested for and found completed, and then re-starts to "choose" and impose a new "if" part. WILL, either contemporaneously or with presets, tests to determine when what ("then") is decided and what "new condition should" be chosen ("if"). Some testing and choosing agents for this cyclically segmented processing of if-then-feedback are (1) specifically preset, some are (2) pre-placed for random and/or chaotic encounter, and some are (3) contemporaneously aware. Even the PRESETS (specific, random, and chaotic) at one time must have been SET, i.e., contemporaneously (consciously) set. So, how would a testing agent "know" to intercede, in order to granulate (halt, delay, and restart) formations-of-space-time into non-instantaneously sequenced segments of bivalently-measurable, experientially-renormalized, feedback? It would seem that for each halting segment that is transitioned throughout digitized experience, there must be entailed some trivalent function, some Recorder that (1) Senses (quantitatively tests), (2) Appreciates (qualitatively judges), and (3) chooses (wills). That is, there must abide some Trivalent Observer, functioning at some present and perpetual level of conscious appreciation, that ITERATES itself holistically (instantaneously) and participatorily (perpetually) throughout the appreciable cosmos, as a plural-iterator of a class of one. For there abides no other like IT. IT is as much a prime halter as a prime mover.
THE HALTING PROBLEM: Each bivalent, off-on, if-then, digitally segmented sequence HALTS and delays when and where the "then" part is tested for and found completed, and then re-starts to "choose" and impose a new "if" part. WILL, either contemporaneously or with presets, tests to determine when what ("then") is decided and what "new condition should" be chosen ("if"). Some testing and choosing agents for this cyclically segmented processing of if-then-feedback are (1) specifically preset, some are (2) pre-placed for random and/or chaotic encounter, and some are (3) contemporaneously aware. Even the PRESETS (specific, random, and chaotic) at one time must have been SET, i.e., contemporaneously (consciously) set. So, how would a testing agent "know" to intercede, in order to granulate (halt, delay, and restart) formations-of-space-time into non-instantaneously sequenced segments of bivalently-measurable, experientially-renormalized, feedback? It would seem that for each halting segment that is transitioned throughout digitized experience, there must be entailed some trivalent function, some Recorder that (1) Senses (quantitatively tests), (2) Appreciates (qualitatively judges), and (3) chooses (wills). That is, there must abide some Trivalent Observer, functioning at some present and perpetual level of conscious appreciation, that ITERATES itself holistically (instantaneously) and participatorily (perpetually) throughout the appreciable cosmos, as a plural-iterator of a class of one. For there abides no other like IT. IT is as much a prime halter as a prime mover.
.
STAR TREK: A trekkie reading the Singularity blog might imagine a future of way stations established and maintained by fantastically programmed machines, able instantaneously to print and "beam" polarized duplicates of the material information of bodies and cells back and forth across vastly connected realms of space. Are we advanced enough yet to "know" whether such may already have been done? Or whether our evolution may be being guided towards participating in some such future? Problem is, some of our genetic deficiencies for crashing into antisocial craziness would probably need to be blended out before we could be trusted to join any such hyper society. Honestly, some of the stuff I see happening in technology today, I never would have dreamed was possible 30 years ago. I would agree with Shakespeare, that there are more things in heaven and hell than abide in my limited imagination. I would also agree that it is not immediately profitable to ponder whether dogs may "really know" the truth about humans. Regardless, they have come to interact with us.
.
*******************
.
.
*******************
.
PERPETUAL PRESENT: The past-in-itself does not exist. That which accumulates is only Information about previous sequences, of events that are segmented in space-time. Math of sequenciation is what accumulates, and it only accumluates in the perpetual present. There and then, such Information is perpetually re-normalized to manifestly define and potentially limit the chaotic experiences of locally dependent, Participatory Determiners (Deflecting Recorders and Observers).
.
OF INSTANTANIETY AND MEASURED SEGMENTING: For the Big Bang, synchronizing units, nothingness units of ZEROS, of a sea of instantaniety, seem to have been projected outbound to encompass and enclose an expanding sphere of space-time, like an expanding balloon, which, when it pops, returns instantly to a single point of no balloon ... cyclically, like a battery discharging into a capacitor into a battery into a capacitor, and so on and on. Each outward phase is followed by mushrooming units or particles of ONES, pushing and pulling like surfacing jellyfish, each segmenting into starts and stops of ever repeating math-based platonic-geometries of spins, twists, and curves, towards ever widening orbits: Qualitative Instantaniety perpetually followed by Measured Quantitative Sequencing, followed by Qualitative Instantaniety ... and so on. Quantum sequenciation at every mathematically digital, if-then algorithmic step and staircase.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment