The Invisible Hand

.
THE INVISIBLE HAND: A moving, invisible digit traces out a pattern, While inertia of the pattern remains, the digit applies an inherent capacity to fashion a doorkey that allows it to transition to a relationally connected but different pattern. Thus, the pattern in which The Digit is not contemporaneously functioning remains affected by the digit's functioning within the pattern in which it does abide. This process is repeated in perhaps an infinite variety of fractal iterations. Some quality of reconciling and apprehensive appreciation feeds back to guide the digit's artistically unfolding expressiveness of its existentiality. Every inertially established pattern remains affected by patterns in which operations are contemporaneously unfolding. Thus, the reconciling functionality of the digit is contemporaneously operatonal and present in all forms, even in such forms as it may seem to have established and departed. The span of time (the perpetual present) abides in the moving and reconciling of the Immeasurable Quality Of Apprehensive Consciousness that guides the unfolding expressiveness of the digit. Each mortal perspective of consciousness abides as an imperfect expresson of the one Reconciler. Each mortal expression fluxes among apprehensions of fuzzy expressions of unfolding forms of limiting patterns. The Reconciler moves without friction between unfolding patterns. Mortals, whose avatars are defined by forms of bodies, can move between such forms only at the cost of fashioning forms out of such forms. Mortal applications of doorkeys entail friction costs, while the Reconciler's application of its inherent doorkey does not. The Reconciler effortlessly moves among bubbles of experience that mortals can apprehend only with effort. That effort entails our experience and communication of an existentially conserved and quantifiable experience of a web of space-time-matter-energy. That web is the artifact of the artistically caring expressiveness of a moving invisible digit that is guided by a quality of omni-reconciling, conscious appreciation of feedback from its unfolding expressiveness.
.
Science is not a thing separate unto intself, Something more than capacity to discover quantitative relationships accounts for the existentiality of science as an unfolding activity. The materially signified cosmos is a creation, born of appreciative feedback between and among perspectives of consciousness that are connected by a conserving and reconciling Principle-Principal. What unfolds to our discovery is qualitatively dependent upon how we are guided to choose to try to model and think about the cosmos. What lies behind science is not merely to be discovered. It is also to be created, apprehended, appreciated, propitiated. Secular Humanists invest their egos in seeking to propitiate their concepts of Gaia as much as religious fundamentalists seek to propitiate their concepts of God. Models of materially indifferent reality and science unfold towards a self-fulfilling aspect, much as models of art, virtue, sadism, and materially significative and purposeful reality unfold along their own self-fulfilling paths. Each model connects in harmonic and disharmonic potentiality to amplify and diminish all others. Among mortals, such connections are to be appreciated --- not reduced to some grand, final, representation of a pre-determining soulless and consciousless algorithm merged to an internet on autipilot.
.
REGARDING LIVING MATH: Perhaps math is not primary. Perhaps math is secondary to a Singular Essence, which has an iterative capacity, which capacity is inherently limited to give expression to unfolding associations of functions, which functions correlate in ways that can be expressed as inherently limiting mathematical laws of science. Perhaps laws of science are the present mathematical rationalizations of commonly apprehended limits of the fundamental, meta Essence. Perhaps such mathematical rationalizations may change, as common vectors of apprehensions of consciousness change. Imagine functions set to cycle within functions within functions, wheels within wheels within wheels, alternating with (depending on adoption of, imbuement with, or appreciation of) various avatars of perspective or focus in relation to context. Imagine an Orbit that can be transitioned in interpretation to a Roll to a Spin --- a three dimension space that can be twisted in time simply by changing focus of perspectivistic feedback. Such as a hag that can transition to a rabbit, simply by relaxing how foci are shared. Once a Conscious Singularity evolves, with enormous potential and power to MANIFEST and IMAGE, what changes, if any, would/should it choose to manifest or imagine? Why assume it must fill any cosmos with any changes or measurable manifestations in order to signify its consciousness?
.
The measurable and unfolding manifestations of the cosmos are the first level signs (logos) of a communicating creator. Words to describe such signs are second level abstractions for representing such signs. The words of the Bible constitute a second level explanation (perhaps the most special second level explanation to date). However, the cosmos, properly understood, is a first level explanation. As such, it is hardly less perfect than the Bible. Regardless, no mortal can hope to appreciate either the Bible of the Cosmos in proper context except in subjective, receptive, good faith. We cannot reduce the qualities we appreciate in good faith to quantitatively perfect, objective explanations. Rather, we only deal with such quantitatives as happen to intersect with our conical fields of quantitative experience. As to the hereafter, we can praise it in nebulous terms, as being good or salvational. However, we cannot mathematically factor such nebulous apprehensions to quantitative aspects of the here and now. No spiritually subjective idea of heaven can objectively guide our conduct in the here and now. At most, spiritually subjective idealizations can guide the mores of people who hold such idealizations in good faith. However, there is no good objective rule that would require any competent adult to sacrifice his own capacity for thought to allow his thoughts to be dictated by any mortal priest who pretends to know the mind of God.
.
 

Evolution of Complexity and Unfolding of Entropy

.
Consider the Measurable Evolution of Complexity and the Unfolding of Disorganization and Entropy: Is not death digitally measurable, like an on or off switch? You're alive or you're not. Being alive is not a matter of being "fittest," but simply of being fit. Evolution need not be looked at as entailing the survivial or replication of the "fittest." It can be looked at as simply entailing the conservational, successive elimination by the contextual holism (environmental niche) of all those who then and there are adjudged to be not fit. Whatever is at any locus that is contemporaneously determined or adjudged to be unfit is eliminated. Whatever is not found unfit is indulged to continue from its perspective to pursue its way. Thus, there is an ongoing process of digital feedback between the conserving holism and each individual perspective of apprehension. Individuals experience a limited perspective of consciousness, by which they experience a digitally unfolding range of freedom (contemporaneously participatory co-determination). The encompassing field experiences a holistic and reconciling perspective. We measure the digital interaction as if it were an interaction among wave-fields and particle-accelerations. However, behind that which is measurable, there is a qualitative exchange of apprehensions of consciousness. I don't know which is superior or inferior. I would speculate that the qualitative is superior to, and gives expression to, the quantitative. The qualitative experience of the measurably quantitative seems to be a complexity that unfolds an entropy, like an invisible hand operating within a measurable glove.

The Times that Try Men's Souls

When theorists of everything think to pin all causation on the unwinding of wound up matter, like the unwinding of a clock, it seems not surprising that they would consider the interaction of conscious beings as nothing more than the random selection of properties interacting with other properties. Because everything is mere property, nothing is sacred. Certainly not marriage, charity, or individual responsibility. What is their response when others point out that they treat everyone, even their own children, as mere property? Do they say the kids are not property? No. To those who believe some spiritual or qualitative Aspect guides the unfolding of property, they say, Well, your kids also are nothing more than property. Certainly not blessings of God. At a fundamental level, when you accept the arguments of those who advocate for homosexual marriage, government as insurance, and taxation as charity, what you are doing, perhaps unwittingly, is ratifying their beliefs that your life and the lives of your children are of no value other than as property. The more you let them habituate you to that mode of thinking, the more you become one of them. That is the fundamental shift that is ushering in the new world order. The NWO is less an intelligent conspiracy than a worldwide surrender of soul and will. That makes the NWO all the more real, deadly, and soul trying. These are those times.