.
Consider the Measurable Evolution of Complexity and the Unfolding of Disorganization and Entropy: Is not death digitally measurable, like an on or off switch? You're alive or you're not. Being alive is not a matter of being "fittest," but simply of being fit. Evolution need not be looked at as entailing the survivial or replication of the "fittest." It can be looked at as simply entailing the conservational, successive elimination by the contextual holism (environmental niche) of all those who then and there are adjudged to be not fit. Whatever is at any locus that is contemporaneously determined or adjudged to be unfit is eliminated. Whatever is not found unfit is indulged to continue from its perspective to pursue its way. Thus, there is an ongoing process of digital feedback between the conserving holism and each individual perspective of apprehension. Individuals experience a limited perspective of consciousness, by which they experience a digitally unfolding range of freedom (contemporaneously participatory co-determination). The encompassing field experiences a holistic and reconciling perspective. We measure the digital interaction as if it were an interaction among wave-fields and particle-accelerations. However, behind that which is measurable, there is a qualitative exchange of apprehensions of consciousness. I don't know which is superior or inferior. I would speculate that the qualitative is superior to, and gives expression to, the quantitative. The qualitative experience of the measurably quantitative seems to be a complexity that unfolds an entropy, like an invisible hand operating within a measurable glove.
Consider the Measurable Evolution of Complexity and the Unfolding of Disorganization and Entropy: Is not death digitally measurable, like an on or off switch? You're alive or you're not. Being alive is not a matter of being "fittest," but simply of being fit. Evolution need not be looked at as entailing the survivial or replication of the "fittest." It can be looked at as simply entailing the conservational, successive elimination by the contextual holism (environmental niche) of all those who then and there are adjudged to be not fit. Whatever is at any locus that is contemporaneously determined or adjudged to be unfit is eliminated. Whatever is not found unfit is indulged to continue from its perspective to pursue its way. Thus, there is an ongoing process of digital feedback between the conserving holism and each individual perspective of apprehension. Individuals experience a limited perspective of consciousness, by which they experience a digitally unfolding range of freedom (contemporaneously participatory co-determination). The encompassing field experiences a holistic and reconciling perspective. We measure the digital interaction as if it were an interaction among wave-fields and particle-accelerations. However, behind that which is measurable, there is a qualitative exchange of apprehensions of consciousness. I don't know which is superior or inferior. I would speculate that the qualitative is superior to, and gives expression to, the quantitative. The qualitative experience of the measurably quantitative seems to be a complexity that unfolds an entropy, like an invisible hand operating within a measurable glove.
1 comment:
Of the Evolution of Islam and Evil: When evil overtakes a niche, when there is an "imbalance in the force," then that which is good becomes "unfit" in a quantitative sense, but not in a qualitative sense. Human freedom, dignity, and decency will measurably wither as totalitarian mind-control freaks, philosophers, and regimes rise.
Consider the Measurable Evolution of Complexity and the Unfolding of Disorganization and Entropy: Is not death digitally measurable, like an on--off switch? You're alive or you're not. Being alive is not a matter of being "fittest," but simply of being fit. Evolution need not be looked at as entailing the survivial or replication of the "fittest." It can be looked at as simply entailing the conservational, successive elimination by the contextual holism (environmental niche?) of all those who then and there are adjudged to be not fit. Whatever is at any locus that is contemporaneously determined or adjudged to be unfit is eliminated. Whatever is not apprehended to be unfit is indulged to continue from its perspective to pursue its way. Thus, there is an ongoing process of digital feedback between the conserving holism and each individual perspective of apprehension. Individuals experience a limited perspective of consciousness, by which they experience a digitally unfolding range of freedom (contemporaneously participatory co-determination). The encompassing field, on the other hand, experiences a holistic and reconciling perspective. We measure the digital interaction as if it were an interaction among wave-fields and particle-accelerations. However, behind that which is measurable, there is a qualitative exchange of apprehensions of consciousness. I don't "know" which is superior or inferior. I would speculate that the qualitative is superior to, and gives expression to, the quantitative. The qualitative experience of the measurably quantitative seems to be a complexity that unfolds an entropy, like an invisible hand operating within a measurable glove.
Americans have allowed too much power to be agglomerated by mind control freaks who want to play God or pretend they have been appointed agents of God, with authority to eliminate and kill all dissenters. They want to replace the invisible hand of God with an iron fist in a velvet glove. If a balance is to be restored that can avail pursuits of goodness, then we must learn how not to tolerate that which yearns to destroy all toleration of human freedom and decency. We must not tolerate being overrun by that which seeks to artificially insult the unfolding interrelationship between human beings and the real God.
Post a Comment