When theorists of everything think to pin all causation on the unwinding of wound up matter, like the unwinding of a clock, it seems not surprising that they would consider the interaction of conscious beings as nothing more than the random selection of properties interacting with other properties. Because everything is mere property, nothing is sacred. Certainly not marriage, charity, or individual responsibility. What is their response when others point out that they treat everyone, even their own children, as mere property? Do they say the kids are not property? No. To those who believe some spiritual or qualitative Aspect guides the unfolding of property, they say, Well, your kids also are nothing more than property. Certainly not blessings of God. At a fundamental level, when you accept the arguments of those who advocate for homosexual marriage, government as insurance, and taxation as charity, what you are doing, perhaps unwittingly, is ratifying their beliefs that your life and the lives of your children are of no value other than as property. The more you let them habituate you to that mode of thinking, the more you become one of them. That is the fundamental shift that is ushering in the new world order. The NWO is less an intelligent conspiracy than a worldwide surrender of soul and will. That makes the NWO all the more real, deadly, and soul trying. These are those times.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
I suspect the big bureaucratic testing system has teachers by the sharries, and no one in the system can break the grip. Sort of like the trooper who was told not to ticket the idiot legislator who did not want to be ticketed, but later expressed his remorse by costing the trooper his job. The bureaucracy must show its power. It must make examples by frequently disciplining people, both for obeying the bureaucracy and for not knowing when to disobey the bureaucracy. The system's need for discipline trumps respect for individual judgment. The more this zombie system is fed, the more zombie-filling it becomes: fewer and fewer people are given the latitude to learn judgment from their own experience. This is part of the process for reducing humans to ants and for reducing America to a banana republic. This is why homosexual ants truly believe sharing a bedroom with a fellow is a marriage. It's why codependent losers believe coerced redistribution is moral charity. It's why welfare addicts believe insurance is paying a premium after a disease or injury is incurred. Judgment and good sense are being relentlessly programmed out of the human experience. Soon, human ants will only need to consult a google monitor to tell them what they should next think and do.
We experience and uncover quantitatives that can be reliably communicated in the material for this niche-universe. It seems what we don't learn is appreciation for The Limiting Entity, if there is One, of their qualitative potential for phase shifts. To my thinking, too many among us assume the material is all there is. I agree it is all that can be measured. I do not agree that it is all that can be appreciated.
The idiot base of Dims would be talking about homosexual marriage no matter what conservatives say. The only way the idiot base won't talk about Homosexual Marriage (and government Charity, flash mob Inusurance, Gaia suffering AGW heat stroke, and fiat Stimulus siphoned to foreign and disloyal fed cronies) is if conservatives completely cave on every pillar of western civilization. What motivates the idiot, adolescent base of clockwork orangatangs is programmed hatred of abstract America, not hatred of the actual parents of the idiot base. Conservatives are not losing because they are the distraction. Conservatives are losing because our institutions of media and academia have firmly consolidated the deadening of the brains at the apex (Stewart, Maher, Maddow, Matthews, etc.) of the clockwork orange generation (COG). Regardless of what conservatives do, the idiot base would still be distracted by the program for dismantling America. When droogs are on the rampage, you won't quell them by throwing away your guns and principles.
Aside from questions of wisdom, are there not more than a thousand federal laws that give some preference to marriage? Do we really courts now to go back and say that Congress must be deemed to have intended not to prefer marriage (or not to have had power to prefer marriage) over other arrangements? Do we really want to encourage homosexual unions to be involved in raising children? I understand a lot of people wish Congress would just keep its nose out of incenting various details in the first place. However, we are not at the first place. We are at a point where Congress HAS elected to intrude. Thousands of times. Given that Congress has, do we now want courts to say all those federal incentives must now be interpreted to incent every kind of relationship, equally? Because the traditional family is key to small government, I can tolerate some rational interest in incenting it, even if I personally tend to disagree with the extent of the inrusion. But I see no rational interest at all in incenting homosexual marriage. Certainly not any more so than for incenting polygamy or any other exotic arrangement. Nor for incenting homosexuals to hide their quest for tax benefits behind the innocent children they want to adopt, sort of as human tax shields. I suspect the balance for whatever good they may do for a few children is heavily negated by the damage done to the nation generally. They don't see that. They see it as a case of just a straw, another straw, another straw. They don't care about the inexorable trend towards breaking the camel's back, towards making nonsense out of social mores and law, and towards inviting legalistic intrusion into the regulation of everything ... all to ensure some kind of insanely false "equality." The homosexual agenda has achieved as much as I care to see. Every additional inch given to that agenda is just one more unnecessary stain on America.
It's about misdirection and power. Not about being Jewish. As long as there are suckers born every minute, there will be conspirators looking for how not to give them an even break. Race pimps will extort power, even as their policies destroy the families of the races they claim to be guarding. Colleges will inflate tuition against dupes seeking worthless degrees. Media will search out how to attract, influence, and suck from the young and gullible. Rinos and Dinos will unite to harvest cheap workers and stupid voters. Al Gore will will leave contrails galore while winding on about global warming. Soros will fund Dims to keep the Keystone Pipeline stalled. Obamacare will put the debt suit on youth while it escorts seniors to an early exit. Muslims with Islam written on their eyeballs will be played against Jews ... and everybody else. And shills will tell us there is nothing to be seen here. There will be conspiracies as long as there are stupids for the harvesting. Given the ongoing consolidation of media and the internet, the danger and power of higher level conspiracies will increase. The educated, self reliant family was the main check against agglomerating conspiracies. It is now replaced by legalistic intrusions of governments, and governments themselves are being replaced by crony owners. There is no remaining institutional check that is effective for slowing crony conspiracies, nor is there any movement for creating one. All mortal institutions of significance have been bent to consolidate the undermining of individual human freedom and dignity. This is the pattern of present momentum. The only pattern that can become effective to counter it abides in the families of well informed individuals of good faith and strong will, who are guided by their unfolding experience of God (the Great Spirit) --- not by the god in a box that is paraded and pandered about by perverted messengers.
Does research or the dictionary tell you what one really is, merely because one purports to be a deist or agnostic? Does there really abide a most appropriate and moral form of human secularist governance and law? If not, must everyone who so apprehends "pass over such subject in silence?" Must all voting and activity in the public square be surrendered to the most militantly self assured and ignorant?
Our keepers are intent on training us to commit random acts of mindless fornication. As to the consequences of that , a penumbra of privacy shields you from responsibility. For everything else, the penumbra guarantees you have neither freedom nor privacy. We are becoming caged fornication monkeys. Why? It's as if a demented experiment jumped the tracks. Or he'll needed a place of quarantine, where it could stew in its own juices. Real progress out of this muck seems possible only with the fortitude of a pilgrim, guided by a clear but distant light.
Too often, people are confused with bad programming. Every mortal is imperfect and thus subject to hypocrisy. That a person exercises poor judgment in how he follows a program is not necessarily a good reason to indict the program as a method for processing dumb data. Programs are not people. They do not exercise judgment and they can be written with fewer inconsistencies. There are programs that are fundamentally defective. A program that is written and presumed to be a perfect substitute for God, or a sort of instruction book for putting God on autopilot, rather than a guide for how to try to be godly, is fundamentally defective for its purpose. People who are conditioned to blindly follow an all intrusive program as if it were a substitute for God are not thereby made godly. Rather, they are made to suffer from god-bot syndrome (gbs). The first thing to do with a program that purports to be a spiritual guide is to ask: Is this a program for guiding me or for turning me into a bot? If it leads you to strap on a suicide vest or to victimize people you know not at all, it's probably a program for turning you into a bot. We can judge such programs. Do they purport to be scientifically perfect programs for prescribing every moral action in detail? If so, they are defective at the outset, because no mortal can comprehend or show how to derive moral oughts from scientific laws. Do they ask you to try on a context for size, to experience how you feel about the context and to try to empathize with others? If so such programs are more like moral guides. The fundamental problem with Islam as a "perfect program" is that its proponents are comfortable with spreading the program by brute political force (trickery and treachery), more so than by moral persuasion. As such, Islam is more a political screed for bots than a religion for moral beings. When behavior is dictated, there is no opportunity to be moral. When production is taken, there is no opportunity to be charitable. When thinking is punishable as apostasy, by death, there is no choice of belief or religion. Rather, there is collectivized bot-ism. For Progs to think that being a collectivized bot is as good as being a human is soon to advocate the dissolution of human freedom and dignity in acid baths (as if it were "progress" towards 72 virgins). Such a prescription towards "god" prescribes no god at all, but only a mask for a severely deformed and extra horny zealot.
Post a Comment