RECONSTRUCTIONISM AND RENORMALIZATION:
CONSTRUCTIONISM: How one preceives that which is measurable of the Nature of God depends on the nature of the Avatar with which one's perspective of Consciousness has become bonded. How one has bonded with one's avatar depends on on how one has come to relate with such other Perspectives of Consciousness as one has come to associate with one's unfolding cone of experientially directed expansion.
CREATIONISM: How one's avatar was initially seeded and formed depends on what One's holistic-self, before one's particularization, then and there ("after" a preceding renormalization of death) first apprehends -- mathematically and qualitatively -- to conceive, conceptualize, and guide one's A-partness.
REFORMULISM: The world is a flux of proto-constructs for being shaped among those who cooperate to seek meaningful expression (life) versus those who compete by seeking easy oblivion (death).
FEEDBACK OF RECONCILIATION AND REMORMALIZATION: How one is guided through Onesomeness of Existentiality depends on reconciliation and renormalization of Feedback between one's holistically-oriented and contextual-aspect versus one's particular perspectivism. This is a process of proto-phasing-feedback between Contextual continuosities (degrees within fields) and Particular constancies (kinds among particles).
MATHEMATICAL CONSERVATION BETWEEN FIELDS AND PARTICLES: A fundamental algorithm of a reconciling Consciousness binds with Spins, to express unfolding patterns of renormalizing particulars. The spins associate with numerosity and mathematical potency, availing Consciousness to apprehend and exchange interpretations, which are fed back and forth between the formulating Reconciler of Consciousness and the iteratively reformulated and renormalizing Perspectives of Consciousness. This perpetual state of unfolding quantitative and qualitative potency (iteration, renormalization, and reconciliation) associates with communications of apprehensions. Thus, the Reconciler produces a context of proto-flesh, which is related and renormalized to the interpretive experience of Perspectives, as measurable-flesh. The Reconciler measures the Perspectives; the Perspectives intuit the Reconciler; each appreciates the other in each's own fashion. Contextual reconciliation of the Holism and renormalization among the Particulars "fleshes out" (fills in the space, time, matter, and energy of) each measurement and interpretation.
SALVATIONISM: The Source seeks to leverage its expressionism via organizations of algorithms formed in association with spins. When a form for an avatar has failed to prove to be other than spiritually hollow -- without meaningful capacity to apprehend, intuit, listen to, or identify with the conserving and synchronizing interests of the Reconciling Spirit -- then such a form is reduced to the tail of a temporal dead end. It offers nothing to be preserved or built upon. Since no thing-in-itself exists, except as a derivative beholden to a Source Spirit of Reconciliation and Renormalization, every "thing" that does not interest or offer communication with the Spirit goes the way of all matter and flesh -- it dissipates. It instantiates no continuing spiritual interest. Because it offers nothing of spirit to attract interest in its spiritual preservation or advancement, it is consumed in its own dissipation. As to our bodily avatars -- it's not that God loves our avatars as things apart. It's that our avatars are only temporal temples -- abodes for availing communication that is meaningful to the unfolding interests and apprehensions of the Reconciling Spirit. As an avatar associates with a perspective that facilitates meaningful signification for the Spirit, the Spirit "learns" to preserve, advance, reincarnate, spiritualize, and save a spiritual essence that is associated with such avatar. As an avatar fails to so associate, God does not condemn "him." Rather, there was no spiritual "himness" to him. There was no there, there. Just a self consuming consumption.
MAYA: There is no "matter in itself." There is only PROTO-MATTER, which is derivative of association with feedback that is constructed and apprehended between a Mathematically Contextual Field of Conscious Reconciliation and its Particularly Renormalizing Perspectives. Proto-matter avails rise of appearance of measurably significative matter.
SPIRITUAL EVOLUTION: There is continuous and constant competition and cooperation among and between avatars that tend towards spiritual apprehension versus avatars that tend against spiritual apprehension. There is a place for both in the world of signification. However, no-thing that is avatar only of material dissipation would be saved beyond material dissipation, because there abides no spiritually iterative identity of it to save. If "identified" to be saved or reincarnated, it may as well be made a rock, bacterium, or dung beetle as an aspect of a self-aware, moral sentience. This is not because it is innately evil, but because it simply offers no soul of continuing or significant interest. Thus, there is expressed constant and continuous battle between avatars of moral meaningfulness (spiritualists) versus avatars of material dissipation (hedonists). One (Tea Partiers) seeks assimilative meaningfulness; the other (Rino-Dinos) seeks dissipative pleasure. The "battle" is never over.
CONSTRUCTIONISM: How one preceives that which is measurable of the Nature of God depends on the nature of the Avatar with which one's perspective of Consciousness has become bonded. How one has bonded with one's avatar depends on on how one has come to relate with such other Perspectives of Consciousness as one has come to associate with one's unfolding cone of experientially directed expansion.
CREATIONISM: How one's avatar was initially seeded and formed depends on what One's holistic-self, before one's particularization, then and there ("after" a preceding renormalization of death) first apprehends -- mathematically and qualitatively -- to conceive, conceptualize, and guide one's A-partness.
REFORMULISM: The world is a flux of proto-constructs for being shaped among those who cooperate to seek meaningful expression (life) versus those who compete by seeking easy oblivion (death).
FEEDBACK OF RECONCILIATION AND REMORMALIZATION: How one is guided through Onesomeness of Existentiality depends on reconciliation and renormalization of Feedback between one's holistically-oriented and contextual-aspect versus one's particular perspectivism. This is a process of proto-phasing-feedback between Contextual continuosities (degrees within fields) and Particular constancies (kinds among particles).
MATHEMATICAL CONSERVATION BETWEEN FIELDS AND PARTICLES: A fundamental algorithm of a reconciling Consciousness binds with Spins, to express unfolding patterns of renormalizing particulars. The spins associate with numerosity and mathematical potency, availing Consciousness to apprehend and exchange interpretations, which are fed back and forth between the formulating Reconciler of Consciousness and the iteratively reformulated and renormalizing Perspectives of Consciousness. This perpetual state of unfolding quantitative and qualitative potency (iteration, renormalization, and reconciliation) associates with communications of apprehensions. Thus, the Reconciler produces a context of proto-flesh, which is related and renormalized to the interpretive experience of Perspectives, as measurable-flesh. The Reconciler measures the Perspectives; the Perspectives intuit the Reconciler; each appreciates the other in each's own fashion. Contextual reconciliation of the Holism and renormalization among the Particulars "fleshes out" (fills in the space, time, matter, and energy of) each measurement and interpretation.
SALVATIONISM: The Source seeks to leverage its expressionism via organizations of algorithms formed in association with spins. When a form for an avatar has failed to prove to be other than spiritually hollow -- without meaningful capacity to apprehend, intuit, listen to, or identify with the conserving and synchronizing interests of the Reconciling Spirit -- then such a form is reduced to the tail of a temporal dead end. It offers nothing to be preserved or built upon. Since no thing-in-itself exists, except as a derivative beholden to a Source Spirit of Reconciliation and Renormalization, every "thing" that does not interest or offer communication with the Spirit goes the way of all matter and flesh -- it dissipates. It instantiates no continuing spiritual interest. Because it offers nothing of spirit to attract interest in its spiritual preservation or advancement, it is consumed in its own dissipation. As to our bodily avatars -- it's not that God loves our avatars as things apart. It's that our avatars are only temporal temples -- abodes for availing communication that is meaningful to the unfolding interests and apprehensions of the Reconciling Spirit. As an avatar associates with a perspective that facilitates meaningful signification for the Spirit, the Spirit "learns" to preserve, advance, reincarnate, spiritualize, and save a spiritual essence that is associated with such avatar. As an avatar fails to so associate, God does not condemn "him." Rather, there was no spiritual "himness" to him. There was no there, there. Just a self consuming consumption.
MAYA: There is no "matter in itself." There is only PROTO-MATTER, which is derivative of association with feedback that is constructed and apprehended between a Mathematically Contextual Field of Conscious Reconciliation and its Particularly Renormalizing Perspectives. Proto-matter avails rise of appearance of measurably significative matter.
SPIRITUAL EVOLUTION: There is continuous and constant competition and cooperation among and between avatars that tend towards spiritual apprehension versus avatars that tend against spiritual apprehension. There is a place for both in the world of signification. However, no-thing that is avatar only of material dissipation would be saved beyond material dissipation, because there abides no spiritually iterative identity of it to save. If "identified" to be saved or reincarnated, it may as well be made a rock, bacterium, or dung beetle as an aspect of a self-aware, moral sentience. This is not because it is innately evil, but because it simply offers no soul of continuing or significant interest. Thus, there is expressed constant and continuous battle between avatars of moral meaningfulness (spiritualists) versus avatars of material dissipation (hedonists). One (Tea Partiers) seeks assimilative meaningfulness; the other (Rino-Dinos) seeks dissipative pleasure. The "battle" is never over.
2 comments:
Obama-The-Dino makes his religion out of materialism. He is preoccupied with material redistribution. He is much like Hilary and Christie. He materially rewards those who help him, and he punishes those who get in the way of his redistributive efforts. His stunted belief seems to be that spirit is make believe, while matter is the only reality. Since no God reigns in heaven, Obama must reign on earth. His efforts to construct a moral philosophy based on such a weak foundation is bound to be cognitively dissonant. I suspect it would be less cognitively dissonant to conceptualize the world as a flux of proto-constructs, for being shaped among those who cooperate to seek meaningful expression (liberty and life) ... versus those who compete by seeking easy oblivion (drug money and death).
A fundamental algorithm of a reconciling Consciousness seems to bind with Spins, to express unfolding patterns of renormalizing particulars. The spins associate with mathematical potency, availing Consciousness to apprehend
and exchange interpretations, which are fed back and forth between the formulating Reconciler of Consciousness and the iteratively reformulated
and renormalizing Perspectives of Consciousness. This perpetual state
of unfolding quantitative and qualitative potency (iteration, renormalization, and reconciliation) associates with communications of apprehensions. Thus, the Reconciler produces a context of proto-flesh, which is related and renormalized to the interpretive experience of Perspectives, as measurable-flesh. The Reconciler measures the Perspectives; the Perspectives intuit the Reconciler and its "interests"; each appreciates the other in each's own domain and fashion. Contextual reconciliation of the Holism combined with renormalization among the Particulars "fleshes out" (fills in the space, time, matter, and energy of) each measurement and interpretation.
The Source leverages expressionism via organizations of algorithms formed in association with spins. When a form for an avatar proves to be spiritually hollow -- without meaningful capacity to apprehend, intuit, listen to, or identify with the conserving and synchronizing interests of the Reconciling Spirit -- then such a form is reduced to the tail of a temporal dead end. It offers nothing to be preserved or built upon. Since no thing-in-itself exists, except as a derivative beholden to a Source Spirit of Reconciliation and Renormalization, every "thing" that does not interest or offer communication with the Spirit goes the way of all matter and flesh -- it dissipates. It instantiates no continuing spiritual interest. Because it offers nothing of spirit to attract interest in its spiritual preservation or advancement, it is consumed in its own dissipation. As to our bodily avatars -- it's not that God loves our avatars as things apart. It's that our avatars are only temporal temples -- abodes for availing communication that is meaningful to the unfolding interests and apprehensions of the Reconciling Spirit.
There is no "matter in itself." I suspect there is only proto-matter, which in itself is immeasurable and is derivative of association with feedback that is constructed and apprehended between a Mathematically Contextual Field of Conscious Reconciliation and its Particularly Renormalizing Perspectives. Proto-matter avails rise of appearance of measurably significative matter.
There is continuous and constant competition and cooperation among and between avatars that tend towards spiritual apprehension (spiritualists) versus avatars that tend against spiritual apprehension (materialists). There is a place for both in the world of signification. However, no-thing that is avatar only of material dissipation would be saved beyond material dissipation, because there would abide no spiritually iterative identity of it to save. If "identified" to be saved or reincarnated, it may as well be made a rock, bacterium, or dung beetle ... as an aspect of a self-aware, moral sentience. This is not because it is innately evil, but because it simply offers no soul of continuing or significant interest.
Thus, there is expressed constant and continuous distrust and battle between avatars of moral meaningfulness (spiritualists who believe in the American Ideal) versus avatars of material dissipation (hedonists who want to gang up to spread wealth among their plundering cronies). One (Tea Partiers) seeks assimilative meaningfulness; the other (Rino-Dinos) gangs up to plunder dissipative pleasure. The "battle" is never over. It is important for Conservers of Liberty to apprehend the moral and spiritual hollowness and likely unreliability of purely economic Rinos. It tends often to be very dangerous to project and assume trustworthiness and good faith in Rinos and Dinos who believe only in materialism.
Post a Comment