People tend more easily to believe what they think will advance their financial interests. Dinos find it easy to believe Republicans represent rich people who should be made to share more wealth. So Dinos tend to believe anything bad that is said about Republicans.
Establishment Rinos want to farm the masses. They have found an easy way to herd the masses by crossing over to offer "free stuff." This gets their shills elected, which allows them to sell out the country.
So Dinos and Rinos are both motivated to use media, which is beholden only to them, to sell the line that rich people (not the billionaires, but the successful small business owners) are bad people. Being establishment Rinos, the Bushes were trained not too much to protest the disinforming of the masses.
Our institutions (media, academia, churches) have been coopted to disinform the people so they can be farmed like cattle. Both parties have been taken over by an establishment that is bent to that purpose. There seems to be hardly any institution of much significance that tries to inform the people, so they can behave as responsible voters within a representative republic. This makes the masses fodder for elitist rule. Indeed, this is how and why elitists rationalize and justify that they should rule.
It's hard work (Is that racist?) to be responsible to become competent to look out for oneself. It's mentally easier to trust elitists who promise to help your comfort and security, even as they sell you out. It's easier to go along with establishment-owned Dems when they call small business owners and ordinary producing Americans racists and the gamut of other names. It's discouraging to be among the few honest voices that try to rouse the masses to reality.
What can help? Reality can eventually intrude. Rationales can be communicated for reforming and preserving decent churches, that can uphold the values that are essential to a republic, instead of selling out to establishment corruption. Science can reasonably be put in its proper place. Faith can be kept, so that miracles, as they occur, can be recognized and accepted. People of good faith and good will can find one another via the Internet and lead boycotts where appropriate and effective. The word can go out that the elitist establishment is corrupt to the bone. As Trump says, it is morally STUPID. Borders can be enforced. People of good faith can fight back and stop accepting the name-calling and intimidation that are sponsored by the corrupt establishment.
People must dare to speak truth. Evil must be named before it can be effectively confronted. Otherwise, the evil will brand the good. The first thing the establishment (George Will and Charles Krauthammer) did when Americans found a champion was to try to brand him as "coarse and vulgar."
As things come to a head, Americans will have to confront the self-indulgent thugs that establishment elitists continue to recruit to rush our borders, intimidate our voters, corrupt our polls, hobble our speech, call us names, maleducate our youth, corrupt our churches, destroy our economy, and (try to) take our guns. If we can prevail, the exercise will help us reinvigorate our republican muscles and restore the truth. It's Time to Get Tough and A Time for Truth.
*****
People consume less on credit once they can no longer get credit. But people are ingenious about finding ways to get credit.
As by pawn shops, payday loans, stealing, pushing dope, selling labor on the black market, lying to get disability and welfare, taking on foster kids for gov assistance, "liberating" property during mass lootings, lifting from the collection plate, rallying for gov handouts from fiat made money, "earning" fiat money by sheltering gov sponsored immigrants, making deals to marry foreigners in order to sponsor immigration status, setting up auto whiplash lawsuits, seeking refuge in prison on the taxpayer's money, running guns, lifting credit card info, gang shoplifting. When all else fails, the gov will guarantee increases in mimimum "tax refunds."
To improve quality of life by freeing more people from debt slavery, we need somehow to get off the pyramid devices that are used for expanding the economy and find ways to live with a diminished and stable population. To move to a more balanced population that is not based on serf labor, we need tax schemes that encourage otherwise serfs to save more without reducing their disposable income or standard of living. This necessitates ways for reinvesting some of the crony wealth, as via a progressive tax on yearly personal consumption.
Establishment Rinos want to farm the masses. They have found an easy way to herd the masses by crossing over to offer "free stuff." This gets their shills elected, which allows them to sell out the country.
So Dinos and Rinos are both motivated to use media, which is beholden only to them, to sell the line that rich people (not the billionaires, but the successful small business owners) are bad people. Being establishment Rinos, the Bushes were trained not too much to protest the disinforming of the masses.
Our institutions (media, academia, churches) have been coopted to disinform the people so they can be farmed like cattle. Both parties have been taken over by an establishment that is bent to that purpose. There seems to be hardly any institution of much significance that tries to inform the people, so they can behave as responsible voters within a representative republic. This makes the masses fodder for elitist rule. Indeed, this is how and why elitists rationalize and justify that they should rule.
It's hard work (Is that racist?) to be responsible to become competent to look out for oneself. It's mentally easier to trust elitists who promise to help your comfort and security, even as they sell you out. It's easier to go along with establishment-owned Dems when they call small business owners and ordinary producing Americans racists and the gamut of other names. It's discouraging to be among the few honest voices that try to rouse the masses to reality.
What can help? Reality can eventually intrude. Rationales can be communicated for reforming and preserving decent churches, that can uphold the values that are essential to a republic, instead of selling out to establishment corruption. Science can reasonably be put in its proper place. Faith can be kept, so that miracles, as they occur, can be recognized and accepted. People of good faith and good will can find one another via the Internet and lead boycotts where appropriate and effective. The word can go out that the elitist establishment is corrupt to the bone. As Trump says, it is morally STUPID. Borders can be enforced. People of good faith can fight back and stop accepting the name-calling and intimidation that are sponsored by the corrupt establishment.
People must dare to speak truth. Evil must be named before it can be effectively confronted. Otherwise, the evil will brand the good. The first thing the establishment (George Will and Charles Krauthammer) did when Americans found a champion was to try to brand him as "coarse and vulgar."
As things come to a head, Americans will have to confront the self-indulgent thugs that establishment elitists continue to recruit to rush our borders, intimidate our voters, corrupt our polls, hobble our speech, call us names, maleducate our youth, corrupt our churches, destroy our economy, and (try to) take our guns. If we can prevail, the exercise will help us reinvigorate our republican muscles and restore the truth. It's Time to Get Tough and A Time for Truth.
*****
People consume less on credit once they can no longer get credit. But people are ingenious about finding ways to get credit.
As by pawn shops, payday loans, stealing, pushing dope, selling labor on the black market, lying to get disability and welfare, taking on foster kids for gov assistance, "liberating" property during mass lootings, lifting from the collection plate, rallying for gov handouts from fiat made money, "earning" fiat money by sheltering gov sponsored immigrants, making deals to marry foreigners in order to sponsor immigration status, setting up auto whiplash lawsuits, seeking refuge in prison on the taxpayer's money, running guns, lifting credit card info, gang shoplifting. When all else fails, the gov will guarantee increases in mimimum "tax refunds."
To improve quality of life by freeing more people from debt slavery, we need somehow to get off the pyramid devices that are used for expanding the economy and find ways to live with a diminished and stable population. To move to a more balanced population that is not based on serf labor, we need tax schemes that encourage otherwise serfs to save more without reducing their disposable income or standard of living. This necessitates ways for reinvesting some of the crony wealth, as via a progressive tax on yearly personal consumption.
9 comments:
Gov steals from the middle class to give crumbs to mass-mind debt-slaves while it keeps riches for the fascist cronies. Every time a sucker's born, a crony gets his cloven hooves. Gov has become P.T. Barnum.
The hollowing of the middle class was the prelude to turning the masses into sheeple for the class of godless wolf cronies. The wolf cronies now turn their attention fo metrosexualizing and hollowing out the men who used to function as the body of Christ. This is the consequence of failing to slow the agglomeration of central fascist power.
Giving too much power to the Feds tempted and attracted too many fascists. Failing to renormalize the wealth of the wolves left them with the power to dehumanize the masses. Encouraging people to work by letting them profit is one thing. Letting them accelerate profits by turning the masses into cheap serfs is another.
We need less debt, more saving, less gov spending, and more discrimination in consumption. The way to incent that is not with a tax on income, but with a tax on consumption.
We need less agglomeration of central crony power and more dispersal of political power to localities. The way to incent that is with a progressive tax.
We need more saving, less consumption, and more dispersal of political power. The way to reconcile that is not with a progressive income tax, but with a progressive consumption tax.
Either we progressively tax the consumption of crony gov as if such were the consumption of a commodity, or we continue along our path --- which is the path to the replacement of the republic with a godless, godforsaken, crony-syndicated serfdom.
There are time and place limits on everything. The enormous power of the media is driven by those who, among other things, are able to fund Super Pacs. Agglomerating elitists are always planning for ways to hoodwink and control the general populace. Ways are needed to restore some semblance of political balance. Direct regulation, however, is at odds with our republican values.
Suggestions:
- Progressively tax the hell out of political funding that calls itself free political speech, and then use the proceeds to enforce the border.
- Define clearer and far more restrictive limits on the central regulating apparatus for domestic purposes. (Make control of the central apparatus less enticing.)
I often espouse a test: What is needed to establish and sustain a decent and surpassing republic that tends to maximize human freedom and dignity?
The problem is that the test must be applied to a moving target. The more we learn, the more surprises we come upon. Each situation surpasses the previous, continuously. We have few certain answers to non-trivial concerns. I don't know what guides us or should guide us. For lack of a better name, I tend to call the guide a source of intuition and empathy.
I don't see many rules or rights as applied to specific situations (that can reasonably be set for extended times by law-givers) that can be free from evolving exceptions. More important than legalistic rights are ways for reconciling differences that will help perpetuate human freedom and dignity.
To refer every kind of controversy about rights to a central apparatus is to weaken our local problem solving skills. The more we diversify and disassimilate our culture, the more we tend to defer to central elitist legalism. The more our "rights" come to depend on crony elitists, the more they get buried under masks of legalism that are really more dependent on arbitrary and conniving elitism.
Every so often, the overgrowth of legalism needs to be burned away, so the soil and blood can replenish the tree of liberty.
Every time a door closes, another seems to open. Every time a Fed judge clarifies one right, another seems to be lost. Individual rights seem to be strangled by an elitist imposed version of "affirmative rights," that seems to lead to a collective right to be farmed.
The more that decisions can be delegated to local levels, the more a variety of voices may gain influence from under the yoke of central masters. To ask a central master to overrule a local master tends to be to surrender more power to the central master, as well as to undermine relations with locals. At least the locals tend to know you as a person rather than a widget. I wonder how much Fed expansions of rights really have helped families in inner cities? Depends on what you value.
Education, health care, establishing codes regarding criminal law and rights of self defense, public licenses and orderliness and sanitation, child welfare and delinquency, public projects, taxation, standards for food and drug quality and the like, seem to me to be appropriate matters to entrust to the states. I don't quite see how respect for the Tenth Amendment in such matters would violate "individual rights." The Constitution guarantees a republican form of government. Not such all-pervasive "equal rights" as exist only in the mind of a busybody elitist.
Rather, when ACLU elitists stick their noses in to try to use the force of Fed courts to make every issue one of allocation of "equal fairness,"tolerance, or individual rights, in all matters, then I think we have descended into anti-republican madness. That doesn't work well, except in a land of wonderful mushrooms.
Authority needs to be delegated to the lowest practicable and reasonable level, but it still needs to be authority. For example, children do not have authority in all matters to disobey their parents. Freedom of thought, speech, assembly, association, enterprise, and faith need to be respected, but not every twist needs a federal precedent. For example, the idea of a Fed enforced "wall of separation" between faith and the public square is an invitation to Fed tyranny. The more important wall of separation is between Fed and state powers. As things stand, the Fed and ACLU ideas about freedom, fairness, equality, and rights are becoming more Orwellian every day.
I see where Fed courts are more and more ordering business owners they deem to be politically incorrect to attend mandatory diversity training. As if elitist instructors had a handle on the best way of thinking. This tendency makes them ever closer to fascist reeducation camp directors. It leads not to individual rights, but to an elitist-run fascist state. No thanks. No camel nose in the tent. Central fascists out!
To preserve individual rights, the best defense is a well armed and well educated local citizenry. Not a billionaire-funded, central-crony apparatus.
I agree. General conformity in language, weights, measures, signals, rules of the road, etc., is desireable. However, the Feds should seek more to achieve such conformity by facilitating area agreements among states, rather than by elitist imposition from top down. Giving the Feds the income tax and authority asymmetrically to distribute revenues has left central crony elitists too much in charge of the candy store. Constitutionally, Feds ought not be entitled to mandate (or use income tax authority to fund) more than a very little to the states. Then they would not need to worry about collecting enough in taxes to incent or fund more than is provided for under the limited authority to issue mandates that is entrusted to them. Feds should own very little of the lands that are within the states.
Maybe the Feds should be restricted to tariffs and a flat rate consumption tax to fund the bare essentials that are within their enumerated powers. (The complication is national defense. To fund that, it may be better, if necessary, to simplify a national progressive consumption tax in lieu of the existing form of income tax.) Most other functions and tax schemes should be left to the states and to such area compacts as they may form.
Adults partying, fine. Crack houses that mess up neighborhoods and groom kids, not. Gays partying, fine. Gays forcing school kids to attend grooming sessions, not. Feds intruding, not ok. States addressing problems, appropriate. Parading with pants down on restricted cruise, fine. Downtown butt hanging out in front of kids, not. Time and place.
In practice, Liberals are fascists who connive to get control of legal machinery in order to put decent folk in a head lock. Criminals are just fascists who don't bother with the legal machinery. Birds of a fascist bent flock together. See, youse scratch my back, I scratch yours, capiche?
Yes, morality can be legislated, and executives can enforce it. In a federal republic, one of the most important questions pertains to the level at which various kinds of functions should be subject to legislation. To conserve liberty (freedom of thought, speech, assembly, association, enterprise, opinion, and faith), the central gov ought to be largely constrained. Most values should be assimilated and expressed at local levels, without even needing legislation. When legislation is thought necessary, it should as much as reasonably possible be delegated to the lowest functional level. More to the cities, counties, and states than to the fascist controlled central apparatus. If there is to be a "wall of separation," it should be more in the nature of a restrictive list of enumerated powers for the central gov -- to "wall" it away from most local activities. When the local people, in their lawmaking, want to consider values -- religious and secular -- that should in main be their prerogative, and the Feds should butt out.
Our present system is based on keeping productive and ponzied masses on a debt enslaving treadmill. The people who milk this system from both ends do not want the producing workers to get off the treadmill before as much work has been milked from them as possible.
For as long as conducive to elitist interests, producing workers are falsely promised (unaffordable health care used to attract cheap voters), punished (businesses confiscated), and blamed ("white privilege").
Meanwhile, the electorate is managed with fiat money and liberty-illiterate (cheap hispanic and muslim) replacement labor. All the better to bury the representative republic, forever, and to replace it with a NWSO (new world serf order). Well connected crony elitists expect to be protected on private islands when the grand pyramid collapses and the real serfdom begins.
**********
People may consume less on credit once they can no longer get credit. But people are ingenious about finding ways to get credit.
As by pawn shops, payday loans, stealing, pushing dope, selling labor on the black market, lying to get disability and welfare, taking on foster kids for gov assistance, "liberating" property during mass lootings, lifting from the collection plate, rallying for gov handouts from fiat made money, "earning" fiat money by sheltering gov sponsored immigrants, making deals to marry foreigners in order to sponsor immigration status, setting up auto whiplash lawsuits, seeking refuge in prison on the taxpayer's money, running guns, lifting credit card info, gang shoplifting. When all else fails, the gov will guarantee increases in mimimum "tax refunds."
I think, to improve quality of life by freeing more people from debt slavery, we need somehow to get off the pyramid devices that are used for expanding the economy and find ways to live with a diminished and stable population. To move to a more balanced population that is not based on serf labor, we need tax schemes that encourage otherwise serfs to save more without reducing their disposable income or standard of living. This necessitates ways for reinvesting some of the crony wealth, as via a progressive tax on yearly personal consumption.
A person may be heretical of established dogma (as am I, also) and yet believe a source of moral priinciples abides.
But why do Soros, Gates, Buffett, the Chamber of Commerce, et al, want to use illegal immigration to destroy the representative republc?
I think it's because they are evil, greedy godless, godforsaken, narcissistic, fascists who were conditioned over their lives to get their psyhcological payoffs by exercising power over others. Their "charitable foundations" tend to be covers for extending elitist fascist power over the masses. Godless or morally unprincipled goons, and there are a great many of them, will want to get their kicks in this way:
“The greatest pleasure is to vanquish your enemies and chase them before you, to rob them of their wealth and see those dear to them bathed in tears, to ride their horses and clasp to your bosom their wives and daughters.” -- Genghis Khan
Trust godless and unprincipled narcissistic headcases? I think not.
Forty years ago, Progs at least had to keep their masks on. Now (or very soon), Progs run openly on socialism, equal funding of poly marriage, equal celebration of Muslim holidays, open borders, forced attitude-adjusting reeducation camps, importation of thousands of Muslims, etc.
Progs no longer bother to hide their evil -- they drop the masks and leer. Indeed, they drop their pants. Bald faces, bald cheeks, bald ... whatever. They are at last completely out of the closet, out of the bag, and twerking in our faces. They get their kicks by insulting ordinary, responsible Americans. And then they call racist (or BLM, white privilege, bitter clinger) when responsible people complain.
Why? Because Progs are evil. And because they know they now have 47% plus enough motor voters and fast-tracked, well networked, Ivy-poisoned pervs and cheats in high places to get whatever the he*l they want. And they expect there's nothing we can do about it! Although ... they're starting to get a little worried about Trump and Cruz.
I am so tired of these bald-faced, bald-buttocked bastids and their weenieized fed judges. Were Muslims to start slapping some of their publicly displayed bald buttocks, a lot of us may not be terribly upset. Unless we had to attend anger-management, diversity-appreciation training.
The Cabal fronted by Soros already owns the Democrat Party. It also has inroads into the Rinos.
Events are quickening. I don't think the collapse will wait for our children. I think it's coming for us.
Q for abnormal times: Will this Establishment follow the law and prosecute Hillary, based on the law, or based on political considerations?
Well, this is the Establishment that has given us: Vote counting by foreigners; motor voter registration; hordes of newly invited first time legal and illegal voters; willingness to hobble the economy to serve special domestic and foreign benefactors; promotion and arming of the Muslim Brotherhood; thousands of killings to deliver the Middle East to the MB; hundreds of billions to Iran to build its own nukes; invitations to China and Russia to military adventurism and establishing a replacement reserve currency; Justices who want to subordinate the Constitituion to the World Order; Fast and Furious and HU-DS as excuses for taking guns and ammo; homosexualized military brass with propensity for punishing non-PC speech; racial divisiveness at levels not seen since Reconstruction; pre-announced submissiveness to Islam; adherence to Soros cabal for fundamentally transforming Europe; skyrocketing salaries to federal employee parasites and predators; and on and on and on.
So then, will this regime follow the law or will it instead exercise its Thug Privilege to prostitute the law for political purposes? Would *Soros help Nazis gather gold teeth from carcasses? Has there ever been a bigger no-brainer?
*********
*See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2364731/posts:
In his famous book {Perfidy}, an indictment of the Jews who colluded with the Nazis in order to survive, Ben Hecht described Becher’s Economic Department, in more graphic terms than did Soros. The Department was in charge of looting the properties of Hungarian Jews, in“removing the gold fillings from the millions of teeth of the dead Jews; in cutting off the hair of millions of Jewesses before killing them, and shipping bales of hair to Germany’s mattress factories; in converting the fat of dead Jews into bath soap, and in figuring out effective methods of torture to induce the Jews awaiting death to reveal where they had hidden their last possessions.”
A psychiatrist might diagnose someone who went through such an experience, yet felt no remorse, no guilt, and actually boasted that it shaped his strategies as a ruthless, and very successful speculator, as a sociopath. Such clinical diagnosis aside, the simple fact is: Soros has devoted his entire adult life to the looting of the powerless, on behalf of the British financier oligarchy that sponsored his post-war career as one of the first of their offshore hedge-fund speculators. He asserts that morality has no place in the market, and that, if he had a conscience, he could never have succeeded in amassing his billions.
....
Soros’s dope legalization policies follow the model of the British East India Company, which waged two Opium Wars against China, during the 19th Century, to impose drug addiction on the population–for British profit and social control.
Bottom Line: The Establishment wants Hillary to be the next fronted Prezy. The fight is over which branch is to have the majority interest in owning her. The shenanighans now underway are to make sure she understands who is boss and swears loyalty to the right team on the NWO. Essentially, teams of demons are scuffling over who will have majority control over Hillary's political soul. Anyone who thinks the kind of candidate who would particiapte in that malignant theater has the least concern for the interests of Americans is a prime candidate for International Twit of the Year.
Re: "Attempts to cover up are always worse than a crime(s) itself."
I doubt it. Attempts to cover up are worse than a crime itself --- if the criminal has not sufficiently kissed the ring of a higher evil.
WWSD? What would Stalin (Soros or Satan) do? The establishment is corrupt and desperate. Stalin would not do a show trial where he could be sucked into the show. Nor would he personally put an ice hatchet in someone's head. Nor would he be seen to be connected with an instruction to use the ice hatchet.
What would Stalin do if no path for any other acolyte were available? If Biden, Warren, or Sanders show to be possible alternatives to the Republican nominee, then arrangements could be made "to deal Hillary aside." But what if Trump/Cruz become more and more inevitable? How desperate and dangerous will the establishment then become? Would Trump/Cruz be in more danger than Hillary?
I doubt the law will be causal. Rather, the law will be rationalized to a use. The method of rationalization will be "entertaining." The establishment and its hacks violate laws daily. The reason Nixon fell was because he had not entirely surrendered his humanity. He was not an entirely evil man. That cannot be said of central Dems for the modern Dem Party.
Post a Comment