I sometimes wonder if a cultural pump may be at work. The following rumination, if false, may not be too difficult to disprove. I postulate that civilizations are pumped by cycles of testosterone-driven barbarism versus estrogen-heavy metrosexualism.
As society becomes more secure and civilized, it tends to promote pinkie wagging, conniving, passive-aggressives. For example, among this round of presidential candidates, apart from Trump, Cruz, Santorum, Jindal, and Perry, who is not a pinkie wagger? The incapacity of Trump and Cruz to pass for pinkie-waggers seems to be the most prominent reason why pundits would be startled if they are not soon eliminated. In the civilized West, only blow dried, pc, pinkie waggers tend to be promoted. Among pundits, these people are called "the talent." May this help account for increased rates of autism, falling IQs, and lower sperm counts?
Notice that birth rates in third world nations that are Islamic, Hispanic, and African do not seem to be falling. So, what causes the drop in fertility in the industrialized West? Does barbarous poverty cause fertility? Does metrosexual security and substitution of materialism for metaphysics cause infertility?
Does the engine of humanity necessarily drive history to unfold in downstrokes of brutal poverty followed by upstrokes in conniving meekness, and so on? Hmmm.
Maybe we will only find the people we need to reset our awkward lean to excessive pinkie-wagging when wolves are running wild in the streets of every city. Maybe then we will once again find and promote the people we need. Like Trump, Cruz, Reagan, Patton, Grant, Polk, Houston, Crockett, Jackson, Boone, Hamilton, Franklin, and Washington. (All being "Whiteys," to considerable extent of European stock.)
There may be a fly in my hypothesis. That is, not everyone on my list of exemplars was a father of a large family. However, Hamilton had 8 children, Boone had 10, Jackson had 10, Houston had 8, and Trump has 5. Note also that many among the world's population carry genes from Genghis Khan.
As society becomes more secure and civilized, it tends to promote pinkie wagging, conniving, passive-aggressives. For example, among this round of presidential candidates, apart from Trump, Cruz, Santorum, Jindal, and Perry, who is not a pinkie wagger? The incapacity of Trump and Cruz to pass for pinkie-waggers seems to be the most prominent reason why pundits would be startled if they are not soon eliminated. In the civilized West, only blow dried, pc, pinkie waggers tend to be promoted. Among pundits, these people are called "the talent." May this help account for increased rates of autism, falling IQs, and lower sperm counts?
Notice that birth rates in third world nations that are Islamic, Hispanic, and African do not seem to be falling. So, what causes the drop in fertility in the industrialized West? Does barbarous poverty cause fertility? Does metrosexual security and substitution of materialism for metaphysics cause infertility?
Does the engine of humanity necessarily drive history to unfold in downstrokes of brutal poverty followed by upstrokes in conniving meekness, and so on? Hmmm.
Maybe we will only find the people we need to reset our awkward lean to excessive pinkie-wagging when wolves are running wild in the streets of every city. Maybe then we will once again find and promote the people we need. Like Trump, Cruz, Reagan, Patton, Grant, Polk, Houston, Crockett, Jackson, Boone, Hamilton, Franklin, and Washington. (All being "Whiteys," to considerable extent of European stock.)
There may be a fly in my hypothesis. That is, not everyone on my list of exemplars was a father of a large family. However, Hamilton had 8 children, Boone had 10, Jackson had 10, Houston had 8, and Trump has 5. Note also that many among the world's population carry genes from Genghis Khan.
16 comments:
Americans tend to trust to themselves and to their own unfolding apprehensions about God, more so than to trust in elites and interlopers -- especially when elites and interlopers resort to political coercion, as by the cheap bribing and confusing (mobstering) of those who are most vulnerable.
Methods for enlisting the weak minded were discovered long before Caesar. LBJ advanced such methods as part of his "Great Society." The consequence has been devastating to many inner city families. Mexican politicians have perfected ways to keep a two-class society, for the well-to-do to exploit the masses. Now, Obama and the Pope invite Mexicans to infiltrate the U.S.
Obama, to flip the electorate, so it can be more easily duped and exploited by elitists. The Pope, to fill pews in the U.S.
Faith in a loving Reconciler is essential to any decent society. Churches can provide the forums that are needed to nurture and propagate such faith. That is not to say that they will. Unfortunately, churches can also be coopted to nefarious purposes. Progs, like Obama, coopt churches by excluding them from the public square when Progs teach individual virtue and responsibility, even as Progs use churches to spread collectivist and socialist philosophy. Churches have become complicit with collectivists in conflating charity with central governmental force, taxation, regulation, and redistribution. Too many Churches are aligning with Caesar.
*****
What's a "true socialist?" A true socialist would tell you that true socialism has never been tried, but that it would work, if only it were tried. A true socialist seems to be a unicorn hunter. Same with a "true anarchist."
We have communication problems because people unknowingly differ in even their most fundamental terms. Philosophy and humanity remain difficult studies. There's little appreciation for terms like "will," "free will," participatory will," "liberty," "cause," real cause," etc. So there's not much appreciation about what is or should be individual rule versus family rule versus local rule versus central rule. A lot of people don't even much share definitions of "marriage."
In government of oneself, others, and a society, I think the methods of local versus central control are important. A society needs centrally to be able to defend and propagate itself. Borders, language, culture. It also needs free-thinking citizens. Freedom within law.
But Obama does not want freedom within law. He wants anarchism within socialism. Obama wants divisive anarchism (multi-culturalism) within socialism (elitist rule). A never ending, fractally-repeating, pattern of Divide and Rule.
I would agree that Obama wants to topple America's system of Constitutional checks and balances. He wants to topple America's assimilation of people, as they act in common good faith and good will -- with trust in a higher Principler of moral reconciliation. I would go further and say that Obama wants to replace the representative republic with an international syndicate of contending oligarchical elites. Regardless of whether Obama consciously apprehends as much, that is the effect of his actions.
The syndicate of elites that is being contrived by Obama and other establishmentarians will consist of: Crony Corporatists (who buy and sell politicians like commodities); Crony Socialists (who control corporatists like pawns); and Crazy Jihadists (who fleck spittle as they rule their dhimmis with swords). Their new world order (conglomerate) will be like a crime syndicate that keeps the peace so the most ruthless bosses who are floated to the top of the sewer can farm and fleece the sheeple.
The Rino-Dino Alliance of people who want this are the corrupt Rulers (Rinos) and the incompetent Ruled (Dinos). Decent, competent, God trusting Americans do not want what Obama is selling. Since Obama is a "moral criminal," he and his ilk do not care what the people want. He expects to continue to "make us offers that we cannot refuse." I would say the President is neither socialist nor anarchist, neither fish nor fowl. He is a moral criminal. A self-godded malignant narcissist who believes other people should exist for the sole purpose of serving himself.
The difference between adherent Jews and secular Jews is striking. Yet, Progs never tire of telling us that godless groups are "just as moral." Well, I guess it depends on what you mean by moral. IAE, the groups are very different. The difference tends often to be between the faithful, who believe in good faith and good will, versus the conniving, who believe in posing as if they were as good as anyone else -- all the while plotting.
If the Devil himself loosed demons upon us, they could hardly do worse by us than the leadership that is fronted by modern establishmentarian cronies.
On foreign policy, our national leaders want to change America from a Constitutional Republic to a Crony-Oligarchy NWO Empire. This means the Constitution is to be made to live under Evolving International Dictates. Our leaders say they want to end terror, but then they stir up strife and division all around the world. They say they want to extend representative democracy, but then they create chaos that sucks in elitist and fascist despotism.
On domestic policy, the people are to be listened to only as a charade. Our leaders salute the words we use to say what we want, but then they simply redefine the words to mean what they want. They say they hear us on the border, but then they import Muslims and STEM workers, while they refuse to outlaw actions of sanctuary cities. They say they hear us on family values, but then they extend family values to value pedophiles, pedophile sex groomers in school, polyamory, pansexuality, and panhedonism. They say they want to improve the economy, but then they increase and extend incentives and benefits for the non-working class. They say they want fairness, but then they impose "more equal fairness" for everyone who is not a white male working stiff.
Everything Obama does serves the interests of those who want to erase independent republics and submerge them into a global new world order. The most basic divide of today is between nationalists and internationalists. This kind of extra-national entanglement was warned of by our First President in his Farewell Address. Money, corruption, and ignorance are all on the side of the internationalists.
Most Americans do not want their country to be erased. They do not want to be reduced to a lowest common denominator of cheap-labor serfs and thought-controlled bananazalians. However, they are opposed by those who hold sway in all significant institutions for organizing, enticing, sanctioning, and forcing human action.
So every kind of glue that holds America together as a republic is being dissolved and unraveled. Every kind of person who is the antithesis of a lover of liberty is being imported as the new model for an immigrant. The demographic is being flipped before our eyes. Moreover, agents for collectivism and the destruction of independent and free-thinking people are the ones who are most likely to be fast tracked for promotion. People who want to preserve America as a beacon for tree thinkers are marginalized and mocked by every institution -- as being hicks, jingos, isolationists, rednecks, phobes, haters, misogynists, chauvenists, and racists. They have a practiced lot of names with which to disparage us.
So, destruction is to be the lot for our Constitution, sentiments of patriotism, freedom of thought, and traditions and institutions of common decency. Any new loyalty oath will be to some abomination like the United Nations or Allah.
People want their lives to have meaning. To serve a sense of purposefulness. The message of Progs, Commies, and Cronies is that the only purpose is staying high, getting many great orgies, and head-banging claims of entitlementism. This promotes isolation and loss of sense of self worth. This sets up several alternatives: (1) Continue to fall down an abyss of degeneration; (2) find some religious, spiritual, or secular interest to which to devote yourself; (3) fall prey to Stockholm Syndrome under some depraved system of radical fascists or jihadis.
The Oregon shooter was not spiritual. He could serve neither helping Christians nor raving regime-changing jihadis. He had no girlfriend. His mindset had left him socially isolated. Getting high on drugs was not enough. His recourse became an imaginary world of violence in which he would be a hero, filled with conspiracy theories for which he rationalized blame. This does not sound unlike a lot of people who tend to vote for, follow, join up with, and march for radical socialists, commies, fascists, and jihadis.
America and the world are now filled with division, derision, and isolation. Some forms of Christianity, spirituality, and philosophy offer meaningful belief systems other than those of isolation, depravity, despair, suicide, killing, or enlistment in radicalism. People who are unable to find meaning in Christianity, spirituality, or moral philosophy often hate metaphysicians and wish for them and their ideas to be "committed to the flames." So what do such people turn to, when they become jaded with immediate gratifications, artificial highs, and accumulating the most toys?
What is being taught, nowadays, by parents, schools, authorities, and entertainers? Well, it seems to amount to division, disassimilation, loss of faith, de-definition of family, hatred of country, and saggy-panted contempt for everyone who has a job who isn't dissatisfied. Moreover, this mindset is promoted by both the Dino-Rino, Commie-Crony regime and our Prez. Our Prez's "solution" to our concerns is more Progism, more drugs, more multi-culti, more Muslims, less liberty, more central monitoring and regulation and command, more thought conditioning, more restrictions on enterprise and liberty, and elimination of guns and means for self defense by serfs.
This will suck us towards more radicalism. This will continue until responsible adults insist on a restoration of respect for a humane culture based on decent faith, traditional family values, and love for a land of liberty. You can't replace or defeat insane radicalism with empty-minded material entitlementism. You don't need a Weatherman to see which way Obama and his ilk are howling. And you can't defeat a howling wind by creating a vacuum by committing concerns for moral decency to the flames.
Apart from being free as a bird and much more effective, how is Obama better than an instigator of psychotic crowd shooters? What may explain Obama and his following among White Liberal-Socialist-Fascists? Why do so many of them unite against America -- sometimes to the point of seeking to make grand swan statements by "death by Cop?" Who are these creeps?
In what sort of dysfunctional, metrosexualized, or broken homes are these people raised, to learn to celebrate getting high on violence, sex, drugs, rap, and rebellion? Who has taught them idiot slogans under childish concepts of grand social statements, critical race and gender theories, white privilege, and bad America?
All these aggrieved groups have come to look upon Americans-with-jobs as being bad. They have been taught by media, college and Hollywood to blame society and America -- anyone but themselves. They, like the masters they serve, have a corrupt sickness of faith. They are numbed to feel little more than immediate pleasure or pain. They serve little more than those who justify immediate narcissistic feelings.
Why do so many Obamailk sulk apart, taking in rotten music and entertainment and opinions, whining for gov to serve them? Why do so many prefer politically to blame others, rather than to seek responsible jobs or to attend to churches that actually serve others?
For Libs, the "analysis" is easy. Simply state: "Obviously, the gun did it."
So Libs ignite with every tragedy as a justification to disarm the people. Harper-Mercer, the latest lonely boy shooter who lived with his mother, after downloading much conspiracy theory and porn, wrote of another shooting that “I have noticed that so many people like him are all alone and unknown, yet when they spill a little blood, the whole world knows who they are.” He is among the people who have found the easy path in blaming society for doing them wrong, for which it must pay. He could have written Michelle's Princeton Paper.
The fundamental change that Obama wishes for the fate of Israel, he also wishes for the fate of the former U.S. This is change that amounts to utter subjugation. This is quite Islamic of him, sniggering all the way, with brutal ladyboy folded legs. What we are seeing is deliberate instigation of violence all over America and the world, followed by the most hightly developed taqiyyah, deception, and disinformation that years of practice under Islam and Alinskyism can produce.
Apart from being free as a bird and much more effective, how is Obama better than an instigator of psychotic crowd shooters?
In America and across the world, why is there so much violence, strife, divisiveness, and festering uneasiness? Of what are Romney's "47 percent" comprised? Mainly, Blacks, Hispanics, and Liberals, with the occasional Corrupt Crony Rino.
Inner city Blacks have mainly been abandoned by fathers, raised by mothers who have been paid welfare to screw the system, taught by pimps to feel no moral purposelessness beyond immediate gratification, and baited by race hustlers to feel entitled to hate America and Americans with jobs. Illegal and liberal Hispanics often share many of the same defining conditions, except they may be more likely to be raised by Socialistic Catholics, taught to dislike independence, and taught to blame Americans for most evils that have festered South of the border.
So what may explain White Liberal-Socialist-Fascists? Why do so many of them unite against America -- sometimes to the point of seeking to make a grand swan statement by "death by Cop?" Who are these creeps, that dwell in basements, defecate on streets, protest with OWS and BLM and PP, shoot innocent children and people of good faith, join in saggy-panted solidarity with Blacks-keeping-it-real, celebrate transvestites and transexuals and pedophiles, join with Muslims to destroy and replace Christianity, and work to register illegals to vote to replace Conservative pols with Socialists? In what sort of dysfunctional, metrosexualized, or broken homes were these people raised, to learn to celebrate getting high on violence, sex, drugs, rap, rebellion, and acting Black? Aside from their parents, who else has taught them to opine that Islam is equal to or better than Christianity, and that Socialism is better than Free Enterprise? Who has taught them idiot slogans under childish concepts of grand social statements, critical race and gender theories, white privilege, and bad America?
All these aggrieved groups have come to look upon Americans-with-jobs as being bad. As not having earned their jobs except by being bad. As "not building that." They have been taught by media, college and Hollywood to replace virtue with pleasure, to blame cops and soldiers, to blame any authority who is not "down for the struggle," and to blame society and America -- anyone but themselves. So all these rotters admire Socialists like Sanders and Obama. Many want to join a social cause to reform GOV, since they do not represent a philosophy or religion to reform PEOPLE or to promote loyalty to faith, family, or country. They have not done the work to attempt for themselves to think out any consistent or coherent philosophy of moral purposefulness. In that, they, like the masters they serve, have a corrupt sickness of faith. They are numbed to feel little more than immediate pleasure or pain. They serve little more than those who justify immediate narcissistic feelings.
May those factors, at least in cumulation, help explain why our society has become so violent, divided, uneasy, and faithlessly corrupt and purposeless? Why have our NWO leaders worked so consistently to divide, diversify, de-define, and de-legitimize typical, traditional, and assimilative values, families, ideals, language, and culture? Why do they want to replace American good faith and good will, representative republicanism, and free enterprise with centrally and oligarchically run one-worldism? Why have America and the world produced Obamaism?
Aside from those factors, may there be something else in the air, water, and culture? What accumulation of stuff has led to drops in IQ, jumps in rates of autism, gang banging, addiction, whining, incompetency, and rottery? Why do so many Obamailk sulk apart, taking in rotten music and entertainment and opinions, whining for gov to serve them?*** Why do so many prefer politically to blame and enserf others, rather than to seek responsible jobs or to attend to churches that actually serve others?
Conservatives may postulate the accumulation of factors as set out above as explanatory, perhaps with an eye to testing some of these factors by a process of allergic elimination, to see which may account for the most pronounced effects.
For Libs, however, the "analysis" tends to be far easier. Simply state: "Obviously, the gun did it. Whitey did it. Whitey won't give up his guns." So, Libs prey with parasitism, predation, fascism, and weirdly-sexed sado-masochism. They seek one worldism under central-commanding, goose-steppping, fascist-socialists with easy solutions under simple slogans. They seek to explain every tragedy and to ignite every crisis as justification to further divide the people, disarm the people, and tighten screws for socially ruling the people -- worldwide. In a metrosexualized, kinder and gentler sort of way.
Every time there is a tragedy or crisis, as certain as night follows day, we will see Obama go on TV to read from Totus to place blame on Jews, Whitey, or the availability of guns. And on the unwillingness of people-who-produce to "Say Uncle," confess in an auto-de-fé that they are the cause of misery, and accept blame and servitude to redistribute justice. Never will Obama admit that we are divided and stressed because the plan for enserfing us relies first on dividing and stressing us. Soon to be followed by collapse, explosion, round up, re-education, enserfment, and elimination. Behold, a tan shade of Manchurian BS! We can't flush Obama fast enough!
************
EDIT:
***Harper-Mercer, the latest lonely boy shooter who lived with his mother, from Oregon, after downloading much conspiracy theory and porn, wrote of another shooting that “I have noticed that so many people like him are all alone and unknown, yet when they spill a little blood, the whole world knows who they are.”
Clearly, these are people who think society has done them wrong, and must pay. They are enflamed by Obamailk, and then Obama has the temerity to blame responsible people who value their independence and freedom. Enough of this BS! More good would be done by frog marching Obama into a cell than by eliminating all the guns in America. At least it would focus our attention on the real problem.
Yes. Jesus' lived in a time of a fascist, hierarchical society, of imperators, royals, land owners, traders, rabbis, freemen, artisans, bonded servants, peasants, and slaves. In law, a Roman father often held a power of life and death over his children for most of their lives. Realistically, an artisan or servant would not be free to engage in a fight over an insult against an authority of higher social rank. But he could, symbolically, demand respect as a human being.
Had the legal system of the time been more egalitarian, where more than mere symbolism could be called upon to demand respect for one's dignity, one need not suppose that Jesus wouild have advocated that one should yet be a doormat.
When modern Christians recommend that citizens should never return insult for insult, or even engage in self defense, they are entirely missing the context. Indeed, they lay open the way for Islamic brutes to chop heads from Western Christians. Insofar as God uses evolution, this is entirely unsound.
Any vote that is not for Trump or Cruz is a vote against America and for one-worldism --- whether it be oligarchically fascist or socialistically despotic. To vote for anyone other than Trump or Cruz, one may as well vote for one's body and soul snatcher. For America, what good came of 12 years of Bush and Bush?
Soon, we will probably be seeing advocates for the absentee voting rights of institutionally housed inmates. Community organizers will be gathering de facto proxies to cast absentee votes on behalf of persons they register. People who befoul the voting process are in effect swarming to kill representative republicanism in order to replace it with elitist despotism.
Not only does the West fail to communicate the problem about Islam, but it often (especially Great Britain) actually bans and punishes people who try to tell the truth about Islam! Our gov has been overwhelmed and made an enemy of the American Ideal and an ally of world-subjugating cults, commies, and cronies. Our own gov, through its sold-out pols, has become an enemy of the American people.
Thje GOPe is mute on Islamic jihad because it does not want to draw attention to its own jihad for a one-world NWO.
Americans and scholars need to be free, without fear of state-sponsored retaliation or hate-speech litigation, to communicate why Islam is not a good thing and why it should be discouraged. They need to communicate why Islam should in many cases not be tolerated. And why Islam is not a religion within the meaning of the "free exercise" clause of the First Amendment (Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof).
Hint: Fof Muslims to force people to abstain from expressing their true beliefs, as by threatening to stone them for apostasy or punish them for contrary argumentation, is not consistent with a free exercise of religion. For that matter, forcing people to say they believe something that they do not believe does not make that something a religious belief. Americans need to apprehend how Islam is incompatible with American ideals and basic human decency.
Simultaneously, Americans need to: Get control over their borders. Stop enriching, empowering, and arming Muslims. Stop letting Muslims bribe politicians. Stop letting Muslims divide Americans.
Simply put, Americans need to start telling the truth about Islam.
Nancy Boy Libs have hit on a way to recruit the best and brightest of scientists, engineers, philosophers, and leaders: Grammar tests! S (sniff)/
The Founders' establishment of a representative republic under a system that ran on checks and balances and assimilated respect for the Creator was such a rare rose.
First, every civilization has had a form of free enterprise.
Second, you're making the perfect the enemy of the good. The idea of free enterprise is to err on the side of less central control in order to free up individual initiative. The idea of socialism is to err on the side of less individual freedom in order to ensure no one gets too much more than his equal fair share.
The idea of big dogs is freedom. The idea of porch puppies is security. The more the big dogs have to sacrifice their freedom to the demands of security, the more human beings are reduced to old dogs confined to puppy mills where puppies are never allowed to grow up. Pajama boys have lots to atone for.
Where is Sanders on international law, healthcare for illegals, and effectively open borders? I doubt he is much opposed to them. If I am right, then isn't he just another liar on behalf of the NWO? With corporations buying politicians and governments nationalizing corporations, it's hard to find the immovable fulcrum, the consistent principle, or the distinction that makes a difference between liberal fascism and socialistic despotism.
It seems to me that the stark choice presented to us is this: We can reestablish and preserve a land that exemplifies decent respect for the freedom and dignity of its citizens. Or we can fall to a lowest common denominator, two-class world. Whether that two-class world calls itself a secure fascism (expansionist Hitler) or a just socialism (expansionist Stalin), it will still be as inhuman as a boot stomping on a human face -- forever.
Libs are no more concerned about suicide than they are about abortion. Indeed, liberals are for suicide when it is collectively facilitated. Liberals do not even require that suicide administered for collectivist purposes be voluntary. The Weather Underground is and was perfectly willing that millions should die on the way to collectivized one-worldism. It's only the self-help euthanasia-by-gun that liberals are against. Even then, they're not really against it if it can be turned to political advantage. Obama smiled on his way to his stump after the Oregon episode. Weather Undergrounds never die. They just change their costumes.
Collectivism leads to inhumanity and killing. People become thought of as things, and things are not much cared about. Collectivists easily come to "care" about people as things. Pawns in a game of conquest and subjugation, which supposedly leads to security and "peace." By promoting inhuman collectivism, pajama boys and dreamy little girls cause lots of people to get killed.
Pajama boy leftists are politically indistinguishable from little girls who dream how wonderful the world would be if only everyone would just play nice. They think laws that make it illegal not to be nice will make it unnecessary to have guns or to learn how to take care of oneself. They think people who are concerned with self defense and freedom (of thought, speech, association, enterprise, and faith), who are intolerant of despots, fascists, Islamics, pedophiles, welfare addicts, commies, and illegals are the root cause of the world's problems.
Pajama boys and little dreaming girls don't see that the world will always float bad guys and that if the good guys all lay down, the world will become that much more despotic and worse. Pajama boys and little dreaming girls are a big part of the load that good Americans have to carry. Even though good Americans tend to get ridiculed, reviled, and removed for their trouble.
Pajama boys and dreamy little girls use Christianity to confuse themselves and confound others. They preach "turn the other cheek" with no appreciation of context. They would make Christianity impotent, thus to destroy the fundamental idea of Western Civilization: Individual responsibility.and non-entitlementism. By the sweat of your brow shall you eat.
Jesus' lived in a time of a fascist, hierarchical society, of imperators, royals, land owners, traders, rabbis, freemen, artisans, bonded servants, peasants, and slaves. In law, a Roman father often held a power of life and death over his children for most of their lives. Realistically, an artisan or servant would not be free to engage in a fight over an insult against an authority of higher social rank. But he could, symbolically, demand respect as a human being.
Had the legal system of the time been more egalitarian, where more than mere symbolism could be called upon to demand respect for one's dignity, one need not suppose that Jesus wouild have advocated that one should yet be a doormat.
When femi-Christians recommend that citizens should never return insult for insult, or even engage in self defense, they are entirely missing the context. Indeed, they lay open the way for Islamic brutes to chop heads from Western Christians. Insofar as God uses evolution, this is entirely unsound. Moreover, it leads to inhuman suffering on a massive scale. Pajama boys and dreamy little girls have much to account for. The price of human freedom and dignity is not paid by metrosexualism.
A lot of pajama boy leftists are politically indistinguishable from little girls who dream how wonderful the world would be if only everyone would just play nice. They think laws that make it illegal not to be nice will make it unnecessary to have guns or to learn how to take care of oneself. They think people who are concerned with self defense and freedom (of thought, speech, association, enterprise, and faith), who are intolerant of despots, fascists, Islamics, pedophiles, welfare addicts, commies, and illegals are the root cause of the world's problems.
Pajama boys and little dreaming girls don't see that the world will always float bad guys and that if the good guys all lay down, the world will become that much more despotic and worse. Pajama boys and little dreaming girls are a big part of the load that good Americans have to carry. Even though good Americans tend to get ridiculed, reviled, and removed for their trouble.
Why can't a woman be more like a man? Why can't a grammarian be more like a logician? Why can't a Prog be more like a grown up? Why can't the farmer and the cowman get along? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vg5cwSBnyQU
Being down for the struggle is how the most corrupt people imaginable get a pass to take all of society down with them. The commie struggle is the front that gets free passes. It's how the people who run the commies (clients of Blumenthal) pretend they care about the sheeple. It's how Cronies are able to own the pols, who run the commies, who use the culties (musloids), to disassimilate the people -- so they can be sheared alive.
The Aino-Rino-Dino Party consists of Culties, Cronies, and Commies. The New CCC. The Poison Ivies, Consolidated Media, Carbon Fraud Bankers, High Tech Spy Monitors, Critical Race Theorists, Kickback Free Traders, Liberation Churches, Condom Charitable Feminists, Baby Parts Black Marketers, and the Clinton Foundation are all in on divvying up the takedown.
Good faith has been undermined, the family has been de-defined, and national assimilation of trust and good will has been gruber-grimed. We have reached peak progressivism. Now we reap the caucus of cackles and cankles. Free passes, just in time for Halloween.
It takes a highly agile criminal mind to "justify" running about from web of lies to web of lies. Fortunately, we have the "Poison Ivies" to train such spiders.
Fem pants-crease panaceas, including the all occasion answers of pass more regulations, turn the other cheek, and tolerate every outrage, will be death to as many people as continue to adhere to them. Cronies, commies, and culties have gutted America by turning us into a nation of wussie-dudes. If, following the self-esteeming queer Muslim, we elect the strange Cackler, we will be done.
I agree that multiculturalism is elitist imposed genetic and cultural drag. The grotesque purpose is not to distribute equal justice. The purpose is to distribute equal serfdom. Corrupt elitists force the toleraton of everything that helps ensure a two-class system of serfs and masters. Anything that would threaten the two-class system is blacked out and not tolerated. In such a system, the serfs are taught that they are not free until they are enslaved.
War is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength. Looting is protest, robbery is liberation, raving is intellectual. Liberal is regulated, safety is foremost, gender is fluid. Rape is love, mindless is high, materialism is sacred. Babies are body parts, mind warping is education, debt is wealth. Equality is hierarchical, Muslims are superior, Blacks are aggrieved. Women are entitled, Hispanics are offended, Obama is double plus. Progress is the way the establishment eliminates individual competence and whities thinking and acting like they are free.
Desoray08, at http://www.enotes.com/homework..., explains it thusly:
The Ministry of Peace is in charge of waging war, the Ministry of Love is in charge of political torture, and the Ministry of Truth is in charge of doctoring history books to reflect the Party's ideology. That the national slogan of Oceania is equally contradictory is an important testament to the power of the Party's mass campaign of psychological control. In theory, the Party is able to maintain that “War Is Peace” because having a common enemy keeps the people of Oceania united. “Freedom Is Slavery” because, according to the Party, the man who is independent is doomed to fail. By the same token, “Slavery Is Freedom,” because the man subjected to the collective will is free from danger and want. “Ignorance Is Strength” because the inability of the people to recognize these contradictions cements the power of the authoritarian regime.
Post a Comment