Wednesday, February 22, 2017

Marxist Christianity



Marxist Christianity is neither Marxist nor Christian. -- Jacques Ellul
The first requisite for the happiness of the people is the abolition of religion. – Karl Marx
If some few passages of the Bible may be favorable to communism, the general spirit of its doctrines is, nevertheless, totally opposed to it. -- Frederick Engels
Atheism is a natural and inseparable part of Marxism, of the theory and practice of scientific socialism. -- Vladimir Lenin

***************

Jesus was primarily concerned with the spiritual, not the material.
Unlike Marx, Jesus did not see Church and Family as obstacles to utopia.
Marxist atheism requires vastly different assumptions about metaphysics than Christianity.
A Christian does not deliberately set about raising a child or any other person to be an entitlement-minded and incompetent ingrate.
Jesus invites followers. Marx would dictate to the collective.
Christian equality stems from equality before the evaluation of God. Not from equality in results, forced by governmental redistribution.
Jesus valued people as individuals, not as Marxist widgets.
Jesus advocated charity as a safety net. He did not call upon government to equalize wealth.
Calling on individuals to do charity presupposes that they have been allowed to accumulate property and wealth. Nowhere does Jesus advocate or intimate that temporal property is theft.
Jesus did not judge against voluntary communal living, but neither did He advocate force of government to require it.

******************

"Privately entrusting resources to St. Peter, in subservience to God, differs greatly from "robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul" through a distant bureaucratic apparatus inspired by the humanist god of power. The Bible never endorses involuntary socialism administered by secular governments."

"The Puritans rapidly abandoned communalism – "that conceit of Plato's" – in favor of vigorous free enterprise, which proved both consistent with their strong religious sentiments, and a rapid path to prosperity."

"Communism fails except as augmented by fear (and ultimately there too), because forging "New Socialist Man" remains forever beyond the state's grasp. Only God can change men's hearts. Our base instincts betray us. When we see someone slacking and still taking - we produce less. When we see others taking beyond their share – we take more too. Without private property and opportunities for profit through honest toil, living standards stagnate."

"[T]the soft spoken women sitting next to the one pronouncing Jesus a communist simply said, "I lived in Communist Romania for thirty-one years. Don't tell me about Communism . . . Communism is death.""

-- http://www.forbes.com/sites/billflax/2011/05/12/do-marxism-and-christianity-have-anything-in-common/#73f295a06676


***************************

Right now, the biggest danger that may incite enough division and hate to cause a worldwide holocaust is the international oligarchy's fueling of feelings of victimization and entitlement to loot and burn.
But that is how they profit and that is what they want. The NWO is being planned in close collaboration with Screwtape. A few oligarchs are decent. But most have become oligarchs mainly by being the most competitive in filthy, anti-humane, anti-republican, and anti-American practices. In the toilet, oligarchic crap floats.
Decent humanity badly needs better checks against the Screwtape Oligarchy. Rico the bastards! And their complicit ACLU band of cherry pickers for advancing despots.
Trump's task, on behalf of decent Americans, will be Herculean. Many Americans are aligned, but vast, well funded forces of Evil are arrayed against us. There will be blood.

Hitler had his nation's media and oligarchs behind him. That is not like Trump.
Hitler stole other people's art. That is not like Trump.
Hitler had complete command of the education curriculum and apparatus. That is not like Trump.
Hitler wanted an empire and a NWO. That is not like Trump.
Hitler despised Jews and Blacks. That is not like Trump.
Hitler required salutes and obedience. That is not like Trump.
Hitler did not need a wall to keep people out because he was moving for conquest. That is not like Trump.
Who is like Hitler? Well, that would be most of the oligarchs that support the "open society" --- so that borders can be erased and the masses of the entire world can be reduced to begging laborers, to be abused by the NWO oligarchy. That would be the oligarchs that incite thugs to do their dirty work by creating and targeting a goat. That goat, conveniently, is everyone who wants to preserve a representative republic (borders). For the divide-and-rule purpose, that goat is "Whites who won't consent to be called privileged," who resist reparations to equalize results (for which Proggies want a "small management fee" for the oligarchy). And the biggest goat for attracting parasites is white men holding responsible jobs.
Who are the New-Hitlers' Useful Idiots and Brownshirts? That would be the P's: Progs, Parasites, Profs, Perps, Pervs, Pueriles, and People Farmers. The People Farming Oligarchs want to rule the masses, and all the other P's want to be ruled and help the Oligarchs rule.
This is despotism. Despotism is what Progs want. Trumps wants to save the representative republic. For that, the despotic-socialistic-fascist alliance of Proggies call him what they are. Projection -- one of the oldest tricks of the devil.

The rot of slovenly minds has now produced this: The new Lib dogma is that those who want people to be judged by the content of their character instead of the color of their skin are racists. While race-baiters that want to incite authorities to "strongly encourage" Whites to wear pins of white privilege are not racists.
Trump, by resisting attempts to destroy America's representative republic, has stirred up anti-Americans. By pointing out fake news, he has incited fake news. This comes as Americans, by resisting subjugation under Islam, are stirring up Islamists. This comes as Americans, by wanting to judge people by their character instead of their color, are stirring up racists. This comes as Constitutionalists, by wanting to defend the separation of powers against oligarchic-funded encroachments, are stirring up anti-nationalist oligarchs.
In other news, the Jabberwock, Big Brother, and Mustapha Mond recently collaborated to write and publish their book, called A New Science of Morality, to be made part of the required course load at every school and college. It explains the mandate that Trump, American Idealists, and Constitutionalists must stand down. To save the republic, it is necessary that they allow the burning down of the republic. Such clear headed advice could not have come at a more opportune time. The book comes with free coupons for the dope of your choice. S/
********************
If our demography tips to more than 50% liberty-illiterates, the republic is lost.
DJT: A nation WITHOUT BORDERS is not a nation at all.

************************

Marxist Christianity is neither Marxist nor Christian. --  Jacques Ellul
The first requisite for the happiness of the people is the abolition of religion. – Karl Marx
If some few passages of the Bible may be favorable to communism, the general spirit of its doctrines is, nevertheless, totally opposed to it. -- Frederick Engels
Atheism is a natural and inseparable part of Marxism, of the theory and practice of scientific socialism. -- Vladimir Lenin
***************
Jesus was primarily concerned with the spiritual, not the material.
Unlike Marx, Jesus did not see Church and Family as obstacles to utopia.
Marxist atheism requires vastly different assumptions about metaphysics than Christianity.
A Christian does not deliberately set about raising a child or any other person to be an entitlement-minded and incompetent ingrate.
Jesus invites followers.  Marx would dictate to the collective.
Christian equality stems from equality before the evaluation of God.  Not from equality in results, forced by governmental redistribution.
Jesus valued people as individuals, not as Marxist widgets.
Jesus advocated charity as a safety net.  He did not call upon government to equalize wealth.
Calling on individuals to do charity presupposes that they have been allowed to accumulate property and wealth.  Nowhere does Jesus advocate or intimate that temporal property is theft.
Jesus did not judge against voluntary communal living, but neither did He advocate force of government to require it.
******************
"Privately entrusting resources to St. Peter, in subservience to God, differs greatly from "robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul" through a distant bureaucratic apparatus inspired by the humanist god of power. The Bible never endorses involuntary socialism administered by secular governments."
"The Puritans rapidly abandoned communalism – "that conceit of Plato's" – in favor of vigorous free enterprise, which proved both consistent with their strong religious sentiments, and a rapid path to prosperity."
"Communism fails except as augmented by fear (and ultimately there too), because forging "New Socialist Man" remains forever beyond the state's grasp. Only God can change men's hearts. Our base instincts betray us. When we see someone slacking and still taking - we produce less. When we see others taking beyond their share – we take more too. Without private property and opportunities for profit through honest toil, living standards stagnate."
"[T]the soft spoken women sitting next to the one pronouncing Jesus a communist simply said, "I lived in Communist Romania for thirty-one years. Don't tell me about Communism . . . Communism is death.""
 -- http://www.forbes.com/sites/billflax/2011/05/12/do-marxism-and-christianity-have-anything-in-common/#73f295a06676
********************
Neither did God wish to raise ingrates or louts.
" Genesis 3:19-20New International Version (NIV)
By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you return to the ground, since from it you were taken;  for dust you are and to dust you will return.”

*************************

Right now, the biggest danger that may incite enough division and hate to cause a worldwide holocaust is the international oligarchy's fueling of feelings of victimization and entitlement to loot and burn.
But that is how they profit and that is what they want. The NWO is being planned in close collaboration with Screwtape. A few oligarchs are decent. But most have become oligarchs mainly by being the most competitive in filthy, anti-humane, anti-republican, and anti-American practices. In the toilet, oligarchic crap floats.
Decent humanity badly needs better checks against the Screwtape Oligarchy. Rico the bastards! And their complicit ACLU band of cherry pickers for advancing despots.
Trump's task, on behalf of decent Americans, will be Herculean. Many Americans are aligned, but vast, well funded forces of Evil are arrayed against us. There will be blood.

I like Ben Stein, a Jew. He wrote an article awhile back that explained how Jews run Hollywood. Three are on Scotus. The rest are Catholics. There are no Protestants. Soros (a Jew) funds many media and community organizing outlets. Jews are over-represented among billionaires and oligarchs. Jews are disproportionately admitted to Ivy League colleges. They predominantly bend what is politically correct, and therefore what colleges inculcate in the mass-minds of students. The ACLU and ADL are predominantly Jewish. Nearly every institution of social significance is heavily over represented by Jews. Those are facts. Facts are not anti-Semitic. Although, people who favor the NWO would like you to believe that the recitation of such facts is "hateful."
Recitation of facts is not to promote bigotry, but to promote analysis. If you are a Conserver of Liberty, then you are opposed to the idea of a NWO under which the masses are ruled by elite law givers and so-called moral scientists. if you are raised to want to be ruled, or to imagine that you are chosen to rule and should rule, then you will more likely want to replace the representative republic with a NWO ruled by elitist "knowbetters."
This begs a serious question: Among the smarter and better connected Jews, how many actively promote the replacement (fundamental changing) of the representative republic and its founding Constitution? The question is not begged to promote anti-Semitism. The question begged -- for all American Idealists, including those Jews who prefer a representative republic to a NWO that farms the masses like cattle --- is: What is necessary to turn the tide away from the destruction of the republic?
The answer is: Wake up to what is happening. The FACT that most oligarchic corporatists are absolutely bent on preventing Trump from stopping the swamping of the borders should wake any responsible thinker. The reason they are so bent is of secondary importance, and may be a matter for speculation. To speculate, oligarchs do not tend to get to be oligarchs by being nice or by respecting the idea of a representative republic (one person, one vote). To speculate, Jews, having been so unfairly shunned for so many years, may tend to promote ideas that help their tribe more than their country. if so, that may explain why some want to regulate so much. And why they want their agents to be in power to decide what is "fair and equal" in the eyes of the law. Research on that may shed light, but I suspect it could always be rationalized to confirm whatever may be the researchers' preferred worldview.
But that is of less import. What is of more import, for persons who value the representative republic, is how to wake enough people up to put more representatives and agents in power who actually love the representative republic. As opposed to wanting to make it kosher --- right down to the toenails.

Take a lesson, and you may fear why they seem hell bent on fundamentally transforming the representative republic into an elitist's legalistic paradise --- which would seem more like hell on earth to every lover of Patrick Henry.

Or maybe they identify with, and prefer, their tribe more than their country. If so, that would make many of them as racist, or more so, than those they accuse of anti-Semitism, would it not? Ben Stein explained why Jews have a leg up in Hollywood. While you're trying to be fair minded, the tribes that are not have a distinct, gang-like advantage. This is common sense. So, is common sense "racist" now?

Or more fair minded and considerate of individual freedom and dignity -- for every American citizen.



No comments: