Do those who routinely eat babies think that what they're doing is evil? No. I don't think they tend to espouse belief that it is good or evil. Not unless they have fomented some religious notion that they have been specially blessed and chosen by Allah to devour other people's babies.
Rather, I suspect they tend to think they, and everyone and everything, are beyond good and evil. I suspect the only basis for good and evil they may espouse is pleasure, gratification, instinct. I doubt they respect any idea of sacrifice or delayed gratification in the service of an innate moral connection among and between all the various perspectives of consciousness.
This is not because such basis is beyond innate intuition and empathy, but because respect for its espousal has been brutalized, trained, or mutated out of them.
Rather, I suspect they tend to think they, and everyone and everything, are beyond good and evil. I suspect the only basis for good and evil they may espouse is pleasure, gratification, instinct. I doubt they respect any idea of sacrifice or delayed gratification in the service of an innate moral connection among and between all the various perspectives of consciousness.
This is not because such basis is beyond innate intuition and empathy, but because respect for its espousal has been brutalized, trained, or mutated out of them.
Except as a label for personal changing preferences, in what way does the concept of Evil pertain to anything that commonly exists?
Much of modern mayhem and disorder is a consequence of mass confusion regarding the nature of evil. And of fascist despots and oligarchs who seek to profit from such division and confusion.
A theory of evil does not consist in a scientific sense of measurables, as for quantifying evil scientifically. Rather, it relates to as consistent, coherent, and complete an explanatory framework as possible for evaluating the choices, values, acts, and character of individual persons and groups.
An individual can choose, do, and act in an evil way. If such overshadows his character, he may be meaningfully described as an evil personage. A group, organization, or pattern, that is not a person, cannot in its character be evil, for it has no personal character. However, it may represent the upshot of evil choices or failings by persons who should have more responsibly tended their societies.
A good person does not lead other people into evil. He does not subjugate other adults to a subhuman status. (He may defend himself from others who already have chosen a subhuman status.) For the most part, he does not remove freedom of thought, communication, association, speech, or enterprise from another. He does not shout down invited speakers. He does not seek to hire or promote waves of demented profs or talking heads to brainwash students and citizens, so as to remove their capacities to reason for themselves.
A good person accords respect to other adults who present themselves in good faith and good will, and tries for persuasion to rely on reason. That is not to say that he fails to take into account the interests, feelings, and passions of others. Nor is it to say that he so coddles young people as to raise them to be wussies. Nor is it to say he is unwilling, when necessary, to be rude to persons who do not incline to present themselves in good faith or good will.
A good person does not, upon finding his own society, culture, or country to be a basket case, emigrate to another, to seek to turn his chosen better society into the same kind of basket case he left.
If evil is an absence of goodness, then it is evil to invade another country to plunder and waste it, as in the case of the country that was left. If evil relates to a lack of moral responsibility in individuals, then it is evil to subjugate the freedom of another to exercise his own good faith and good will. If evil relates to disrespect for a reconciling spirituality of interconnecting good faith, then a so-called religion that advocates killing people, for being apostate to its word-formulas for expressing faith, is an upshot of evil.
Dots connect to make it reasonable to inquire: Are not the following the sponsors or upshots of Evil? Communists, NWO Oligarchs, destroyers of families, destroyers of representative republics, Muslims, organized looters, organized proponents of terrorism for the sake of overthrowing a representative republic, race-baiters who divide and antagonize peoples and communities based on race, gender, or origin, and purveyors of fake moral scientism as a basis for replacing freedom with rule under fake scientists and asinine despots.
IOW, is not the Uniparty of Rinos and Dinos in fact, an upshot of Evil?
***************
I think the subjective and the objective are inextricably mixed, rather than completely one or the other. To my intuition, there abides a holism whose existentiality is objective, but beyond the measure of its part-icular perspectives, i.e., subjects. My perspective of the (objective) holism is subject (subjective) to my perspective.
I think the Reconciling Principler is real, but its application is personal (subjective) to each perspective. I think an interconnecting empathy is innate to every perspective of consciousness. Consciousness is consciousness, but each of our limited perspectives of it is subjective.
Consciousness measures what is objective, but aspects of itself defy objective measure that is apart from qualitative appreciation. This is why the good faith and good will of each subjective perspective, in feedback with a reconciling holism, is a vital aspect for any model about morality. Otherwise, how can "higher mindedness" mean anything?
************
I don't think mortal prophets have any innate advantage over me in making sense out of what is fundamentally paradoxical. I consult the Good Book, but I also consult the Book of the Cosmos and the Book of Innate Good Faith. I am just an egg. Like you.
I doubt the Almighty cares about word-sound-formula-incantations we try to interpose to ensure some kind of unknowable eternal relationship. What I don't doubt is Jesus' teaching about the Great Commandment and the Golden Rule. And that is what is essential to establish and preserve a decent representative republic.
Otoh, I don't think gov-forced incantation of John 3:16 is conducive to a decent representative republic. On that, I am with the Founders.
***********
The ideas of identity, belief, and eternity are so paradoxical that, when mixed, I simply do not grok how any reasonable mortal can intelligently claim to fathom them. However, I am just an egg.
***********
Leftism is intolerance of individualism. Intolerance of individuals deciding what to think, communicate, and do. Intolerance of individuals taking responsibility for themselves or their associations. Subjugating everyone to believe, think, and do as some charismatic, pretending mouthpieces for God or science presume to require. Replacing responsible humans with subhuman tools for despots, while pretending to be pursuing the greater good.
Leftist totalitarianism comes in various flavors, such as Mohammadism, Marxism, Masochism, Munchausenism, Minorityism, and Motherism. It infantalizes monsters so they can never grow up to become decent human beings or to be able to sustain a representative republic.
Leftism is Evil operating under a mask of good intentions. It is Evil because it denies the moral authority and responsibility of individuals by inventing myths about the moral authority and responsibility of non-human organizations and pagan patterns. It reviles human morality while it imagines unicorn moral "science."
When people (phony proggies) do not believe in a principle of higher minded reconciliation, they tend to default to personal pleasure. They seek pleasure only for themselves and perhaps those with whom they identify. Depending on fluxes in six degrees of Kevin Bacon, those connections in identification may or may not result in a decent society, nation, or civilization.
More likely, they will result in conflict among contending tribes of decadent pleasure seekers. Their purposes will tend to be directed to the biggest orgasm, the highest high, the most powerful of the powerful, and the grooming, abuse, dhimmification, and enserfment of all who stand in their way. And they will pursue such things "scientifically." A recipe for decent civilization, this is not.
*****************
Rinos and Dinos both represent Olds. Old Establishment, but always finding new ways to divide and farm the masses. The mass farm is their idea of progress. Insofar as that progress is made at the cost of the freedom and dignity of the people at large, it is evil. Regardless of whether that "progress" is by oligarchs while wearing their Dem hats or by oligarchs while wearing their Repub hats. The "progress" of Rinos and Dinos is based on people-farming, all the way down.
Olds do not teach people how to think for themselves. Fundamentalist Christians rely on authoritarianism, revelation, and fear. Fundamentalist Libs rely on Rules for Radicals. Neither think for themselves.
To say Dinos are not evil because Rinos do it too ... is fallacious. Because the Rinos who do it are also evil. Any adult who sets out to lord his will in order to subjugate the freedom of another is evil --- unless the other has already surrendered his freedom to an opposing tyrant. It is evil to farm people who are not subhumans as if they were subhumans. The oligarchs who fund Dinos tend to be the same oligarchs who hedge-fund Rinos.
Olds do not teach people how to think for themselves. Fundamentalist Christians rely on authoritarianism, revelation, and fear. Fundamentalist Libs rely on Rules for Radicals. Neither think for themselves.
To say Dinos are not evil because Rinos do it too ... is fallacious. Because the Rinos who do it are also evil. Any adult who sets out to lord his will in order to subjugate the freedom of another is evil --- unless the other has already surrendered his freedom to an opposing tyrant. It is evil to farm people who are not subhumans as if they were subhumans. The oligarchs who fund Dinos tend to be the same oligarchs who hedge-fund Rinos.
*************
I think consciousness (sense of beingness) is an innate aspect of the cosmos, and that qualitative aspects of it defy measurement by any of the usual senses. I think that consciousness is the same everywhere. What makes it seem different is that it is experienced through different patterns of bodies, with differently limiting senses for measuring what presents as the measurable substance around us. I don't think presently measurable Substance could exist without two other fundaments: Accumulating Information, and immeasurable Consciousness. Fundamentally, something about existentiality requires observers.
IAE, I don't think a society that is unable to assimilate an idea of Higher Mindedness can either establish or sustain a representative republic. Rather, I think the default condition of any such society is one of despotism.
IAE, I don't think a society that is unable to assimilate an idea of Higher Mindedness can either establish or sustain a representative republic. Rather, I think the default condition of any such society is one of despotism.
I think our experiences of separate consciousness are a consequence of differently evolving ways for limiting the consciousness of the holism. Each of us is temporally defined by how our blinders temporally evolve. Our eternal definition is something quite unlimited and paradoxical.
IAE, the main issue I am here concerned with is not what is essential to eternal salvation.
Rather, my main concern here is what is essential to sustain a decent republic under Higher Mindedness. If you don't believe in Higher Mindedness, you can't very well devote yourself to that issue.
What is your measurable proof of what you take to be your own conscious identity? Can that be rigorously defined or tested? You say "you" require empirical proof, yet you have no empirical proof of what your you-ness is.
So I say you are, in a way, relying on a faith-based stance: That you -- whatever you are -- will always require empirical proof. Yet, many human transactions are one of a kind, perhaps never to be exactly repeated. So, except on judgment based in part on intuition and insight, how do you test or prove whether you should trust a person, seek to rule over another person, vote for a politician, or advocate for a public cause?
Note: I am not advocating for a testable theory of beingness. I am only advocating for a model, a way of thinking, that I try to make as internally consistent, coherent, and complete as possible. I do not claim it is testable truth. Only that it seems to support morality, empathy, freedom, and representative republicanism. Which I, in whatever moral authority "I" have, say is good. And seek to make it so. :)
I agree that the best part of religious faith, or faith of any kind, seems often to get lost in the minutiae. I am not one to stand on ceremony, diets, dress, or incantations. Although I can appreciate metaphoric beauty and inspiring passion that often accompany such things.
******************
Yet, so long as we live, we have no choice but to make choices. Failing to make a choice or to take a stand is itself a kind of choice. And to be correct, that "all is subjective," would necessitate an objective standard. How do you know that all is subjective? How do you know that there abides no Reconciler, which is not subject, but in respect of which we mortals are subjects (subjectives)?
So long as I am tasked to make choices, my stand is that I prefer that my choices be reasoned, empathetic, purposeful, principled, consistent, coherent. That necessitates a leap of faith. I don't think anyone can live very long without making some leaps of faith. Then, the concern becomes, what leaps of faith are most reasonable?
For that, my chosen test is to ask: What is needed to assimilate and sustain a decent representative republic? Whatever it is that Ainos think they are doing, I do not believe it is conducive to a representative republic.
**************
I do hate mind zombies. They tend to be tools of the people-farm. The people-farm, being collectivist, is a thing of the Left.
I don't hate confused Lefties who have not entirely forsaken reason. But I do hate mind zombies, left or right. However, by definition, almost all zombie collectors are violent Lefties.
Colleges seem to be zeroing in on the ultimate people-farming quest. That is, many of the social studies colleges don't just burn away students' capacities or desires to think for themselves. They actually produce the ultimate product: Mind zombies.
The infestation seems to be as great and nearly as horrific as in any zombie sci-fi flick. Yet, they call these products "educated." They are like Muslim suicide bombers, except they kill minds without killing the bodies.
Obama sold out every representative republic to an ugly NWO. As an individual American, Obama is a spiteful, hateful, race-baiting, incompetent, perpetual infant. And he paved the way for a majority of his ilk to invade and swamp the republic.
Being nice will not fix this. Appealing to reason will not fix this. Most of Obama-ilk are beyond niceties or reason. They, like the oligarchy that funds them, want to destroy every independent republic, to reduce them all to a lowest common denominator of corrupti and ignoranti.
Most of Obama's supporters would rather be equal in hell than to aspire to become individually competent or responsible. Most of Obama's funders are content to rule in hell, because there is nothing higher in their mindedness than hell.
When you understand Obama, you will suddenly sense the invisible, startling vomit that spews from him. Now that Obama-ilk have sold us out, they tell us we must be pleasant to them -- even as they continue to shout down all dissent and attempts to MAGA.
*************
The Reconciler will guide us as we become receptive. Then, nothing can stop our cause. The godless NWO Oligarchy holds the money and the institutions. They cling to their willies and their goosey shillies, but not to faith. They send pretended holy men among us, but their conflation of taxes for charity marks them as fakers. They are puffed up, but hollow.
You forgot Joan of Arc. And Laura Loomer and Pamela Geller. Conservers of Liberty are here, and more are coming.
************
"You know, by God, I actually pity those poor bastards we're going up against." https://youtu.be/NDAWaYu-YCo
https://youtu.be/uYjnWXFTQkM
Beginning at 4:54 -- https://youtu.be/1ZKS1t1KEl8
I do not support abortion. But I think, under our Constitution as written, pending Amendment, it should be a matter for the States. I think the States would soon curtail it.
During our worldly sojourn, we have to keep our eyes on the prize if we want to re-inspire, re-establish, and then preserve a decent representative republic. We can't make the perfect the enemy of the good. We can make headway with people who have not entirely forsaken capacity to take responsibility for reasoning for themselves --- even as they do some things we think evil. We need their alliance against those that have fallen completely under the spell of mindless enserfment to the godless Oligarchy. But we must not import them in such numbers as to undermine our own republic. If we keep our eyes on the prize, we will make Pilgrim's Progress --- even on Earth.
How do we inoculate people against zombie brain poisoning? In many cases, homeschool! Yay!
I agree that freedom requires a framework of law, but only a framework. A free market requires a framework to protect against oligarchic, nation-owning abusers. The buck that tries to engage in a free market when among lions and wolves only makes himself a free lunch. Freedom requires effective checks and balances, and, often, the spiritual and intestinal fortitude to impose T for Tat. That leaves out the femimen.
Impeachment could never work against Obama so long as the oligarchy that fronted him opposed it. Impeachment only works when the Oligarchy wants it to. When the Oligarchy cannot impeach as it would like, it simply uses its media-academia apparatus to neuter the Executive. When the Executive seeks to neuter the Oligarchy, the Oligarchy's purchased Rinos step in. Our institutions were inadequate to prevent the rise and empowerment of a new, worldwide class of aristocratic oligarchs, so now we reap the consequence.
Trump is likely evaluating whether enough of a remnant remains to turn the NWO corruption around. Whether, once he is gone, there will remain anyone who can continue the restoration of the republic. Trump is game, but not foolish enough to play for a lost cause. The forces that created a treasonous oligarchy, a purchased Congress, and a zombie electorate remain.
Something is missing, without which that cannot be reversed. What is missing is not a matter of mere form. A COS and the Liberty Amendments would be a start. But they will not fix all the mechanisms by which the oligarchy continues to agglomerate wealth and power enough to buy politicians and entire governments.
Something more is needed to re-assimilate a society that can be deserving of a representative republic. Something more is needed to convince the Reconciler that we are deserving of being led out of the worldwide bondage we are allowing and often greasing. We have to re-assimilate the Will to follow the Reconciler and to re-assimilate our sense of individual responsibility. Otherwise, neither Trump nor the Reconciler would likely deem the time right to lead us to a restoration of human freedom, dignity, and decency.
So long as so many have so little faith in Higher Mindedness, there is little point among them for arguing for Higher Mindedness. If our only organizing "scientific moral principle" remains the most pleasure for the most people, we will become the perpetually warring worldwide people-farms, scientifically.
If the Zombie Ainos will foster the murder of a President, what will they foster against the masses? I shudder to think of it. Laura has shown us how to man up against the Nazi NWO. Despite all the depredations of Obama, I never sought his murder.
I am not sure DJT can lead us out of this. But I am sure that none of the other contenders could have. The evil in the oligarchy and its media-academia apparatus is breath taking.
Being nice will not fix this. Appealing to reason will not fix this. Most of Obama-ilk are beyond niceties or reason. They, like the oligarchy that funds them, want to destroy every independent republic, to reduce them all to a lowest common denominator of corrupti and ignoranti.
Social engineering pertains to the scientism of people farming. Canada welcomes you, cow-people --- femi-bulls and heifers, alike.
Obama sold out every representative republic to an ugly NWO. As an individual American, Obama is a spiteful, hateful, race-baiting, incompetent, perpetual infant. And he paved the way for a majority of his ilk to invade and swamp the republic.
Being nice will not fix this. Appealing to reason will not fix this. Most of Obama-ilk are beyond niceties or reason. They, like the oligarchy that funds them, want to destroy every independent republic, to reduce them all to a lowest common denominator of corrupti and ignoranti.
Most of Obama's supporters would rather be equal in hell than to aspire to become individually competent or responsible. Most of Obama's funders are content to rule in hell, because there is nothing higher in their mindedness than hell.
When you understand Obama, you will suddenly sense the invisible, startling vomit that spews from him. Now that Obama-ilk have sold us out, they tell us we must be pleasant to them -- even as they continue to shout down all dissent and attempts to MAGA.
************
"You know, by God, I actually pity those poor bastards we're going up against." https://youtu.be/NDAWaYu-YCo
https://youtu.be/uYjnWXFTQkM
Beginning at 4:54 -- https://youtu.be/1ZKS1t1KEl8
I do not support abortion. But I think, under our Constitution as written, pending Amendment, it should be a matter for the States. I think the States would soon curtail it.
During our worldly sojourn, we have to keep our eyes on the prize if we want to re-inspire, re-establish, and then preserve a decent representative republic. We can't make the perfect the enemy of the good. We can make headway with people who have not entirely forsaken capacity to take responsibility for reasoning for themselves --- even as they do some things we think evil. We need their alliance against those that have fallen completely under the spell of mindless enserfment to the godless Oligarchy. But we must not import them in such numbers as to undermine our own republic. If we keep our eyes on the prize, we will make Pilgrim's Progress --- even on Earth.
How do we inoculate people against zombie brain poisoning? In many cases, homeschool! Yay!
I agree that freedom requires a framework of law, but only a framework. A free market requires a framework to protect against oligarchic, nation-owning abusers. The buck that tries to engage in a free market when among lions and wolves only makes himself a free lunch. Freedom requires effective checks and balances, and, often, the spiritual and intestinal fortitude to impose T for Tat. That leaves out the femimen.
Impeachment could never work against Obama so long as the oligarchy that fronted him opposed it. Impeachment only works when the Oligarchy wants it to. When the Oligarchy cannot impeach as it would like, it simply uses its media-academia apparatus to neuter the Executive. When the Executive seeks to neuter the Oligarchy, the Oligarchy's purchased Rinos step in. Our institutions were inadequate to prevent the rise and empowerment of a new, worldwide class of aristocratic oligarchs, so now we reap the consequence.
Trump is likely evaluating whether enough of a remnant remains to turn the NWO corruption around. Whether, once he is gone, there will remain anyone who can continue the restoration of the republic. Trump is game, but not foolish enough to play for a lost cause. The forces that created a treasonous oligarchy, a purchased Congress, and a zombie electorate remain.
Something is missing, without which that cannot be reversed. What is missing is not a matter of mere form. A COS and the Liberty Amendments would be a start. But they will not fix all the mechanisms by which the oligarchy continues to agglomerate wealth and power enough to buy politicians and entire governments.
Something more is needed to re-assimilate a society that can be deserving of a representative republic. Something more is needed to convince the Reconciler that we are deserving of being led out of the worldwide bondage we are allowing and often greasing. We have to re-assimilate the Will to follow the Reconciler and to re-assimilate our sense of individual responsibility. Otherwise, neither Trump nor the Reconciler would likely deem the time right to lead us to a restoration of human freedom, dignity, and decency.
So long as so many have so little faith in Higher Mindedness, there is little point among them for arguing for Higher Mindedness. If our only organizing "scientific moral principle" remains the most pleasure for the most people, we will become the perpetually warring worldwide people-farms, scientifically.
If the Zombie Ainos will foster the murder of a President, what will they foster against the masses? I shudder to think of it. Laura has shown us how to man up against the Nazi NWO. Despite all the depredations of Obama, I never sought his murder.
I am not sure DJT can lead us out of this. But I am sure that none of the other contenders could have. The evil in the oligarchy and its media-academia apparatus is breath taking.
Being nice will not fix this. Appealing to reason will not fix this. Most of Obama-ilk are beyond niceties or reason. They, like the oligarchy that funds them, want to destroy every independent republic, to reduce them all to a lowest common denominator of corrupti and ignoranti.
Social engineering pertains to the scientism of people farming. Canada welcomes you, cow-people --- femi-bulls and heifers, alike.
Obama sold out every representative republic to an ugly NWO. As an individual American, Obama is a spiteful, hateful, race-baiting, incompetent, perpetual infant. And he paved the way for a majority of his ilk to invade and swamp the republic.
Being nice will not fix this. Appealing to reason will not fix this. Most of Obama-ilk are beyond niceties or reason. They, like the oligarchy that funds them, want to destroy every independent republic, to reduce them all to a lowest common denominator of corrupti and ignoranti.
Most of Obama's supporters would rather be equal in hell than to aspire to become individually competent or responsible. Most of Obama's funders are content to rule in hell, because there is nothing higher in their mindedness than hell.
When you understand Obama, you will suddenly sense the invisible, startling vomit that spews from him. Now that Obama-ilk have sold us out, they tell us we must be pleasant to them -- even as they continue to shout down all dissent and attempts to MAGA.
I think we will lose only if we believe we are going to lose. If we become disgusted, rally in faith, and fight back, we will not lose.
We need more American preachers to step up to champion the fight to restore responsible representative republicanism. We need for them to stop being apologists for the wussification of faith, the undermining of family, and the destruction of borders and patriotic fidelity.
We need more American preachers to step up to champion the fight to restore responsible representative republicanism. We need for them to stop being apologists for the wussification of faith, the undermining of family, and the destruction of borders and patriotic fidelity.
*************
The classification of who is Jewish or Jew-like seems to vary considerably, depending on who is doing the classifying and for what purpose. But, on what basis other than nonsense should God be thought to favor those born of mixed marriages and Jewish mothers over those born of mixed marriages and Jewish fathers?
It is also a mystery why the eternal Godhead should be thought to be burdened with an eternal fetish over a myriad of dietary, dress, and ceremonial minutiae. Or why any such a classification should be thought specially blessed or chosen to rule over all others. When you look at the Muslim justification for imposing dhimmitude, it becomes tempting to consider this predilection a Semite thing.
However, I think it is more like a natural gang-banging thing. Like how Blacks use skin color to decide who is appropriate to gang-bang with. Most successful clan or culture leaders find or deploy marks or patches by which to identify their chosen. Even when they seek to tear down older cultures, as so-called neo-minorities do to Anglo cultures, they tend to continue to use gang-banging favoritism.
I don't think there is anything supernaturally special about any particular color or ancestry. But, such aspects do seem to avail convenience for wannabe gang-bangers.
I wish an enlightened culture could move past such devices. However, the putsch to move past Anglo republics is no such an enlightenment. Rather, it has been operating merely as a putsch to install new gang-bangers. Ultimately, oligarchic gang-bangers. The default quest seems to be to devise ways for the fewest of us to farm the most of us. Our religious and spiritual leaders have so far done a poor job of inspiring us to move past that.
Absent responsible judgment among individual moral agents, every so-called scientific (liberal) pursuit of max pleasure will tend to neglect to factor the opportunity-investment cost. This is because science cannot very well factor that which was not selected. That is the job of moral judgment. As an organizing "principle," so-called "scientific" group hedonism (fake enlightenment) neglects what is necessary to raise children to become the next generation of responsible citizens. Somehow, no-harm-no-foul Libs seem always to forget about (or forfeit) the children, i.e., the generation that will be taxed to clean up their mess. Indeed, they are hardly willing to procreate. In Patton's patois, they know no more about philosophy than they know about forn ifi cat ion.
There is nothing in being black (or any other skin color), per se, that disallows a person from becoming superior in intellect, physicality, and virtue. Rather, the problem is with how the gene pool has been generally filtered. (To consider how rapidly this can alter a human gene pool, compare the history of dog breeds.)
Nor is there anything, per se, that disallows any immigrant from becoming a valued, free-thinking, competent American. Rather, the problem is with how our controllers are generally filtering the applicants.
When poor filtering of genetic and immigration pools is not sufficiently and generally opposed, every representative republic is endangered. (Note: Lest linear, one-dimensional, wussie-cretins get their panties in a bunch, I am not talking about specific or invasive genetic design. I am talking about general programs for factoring immigration and job applicants, so as to avoid the enserfing destruction of a republic.)
There is nothing morally superior or enlightening about allowing oligarchs and their Brooksian tools to swamp a republic with easily enserfed liberty-illiterates.
The classification of who is Jewish or Jew-like seems to vary considerably, depending on who is doing the classifying and for what purpose. But, on what basis other than nonsense should God be thought to favor those born of mixed marriages and Jewish mothers over those born of mixed marriages and Jewish fathers?
It is also a mystery why the eternal Godhead should be thought to be burdened with an eternal fetish over a myriad of dietary, dress, and ceremonial minutiae. Or why any such a classification should be thought specially blessed or chosen to rule over all others. When you look at the Muslim justification for imposing dhimmitude, it becomes tempting to consider this predilection a Semite thing.
However, I think it is more like a natural gang-banging thing. Like how Blacks use skin color to decide who is appropriate to gang-bang with. Most successful clan or culture leaders find or deploy marks or patches by which to identify their chosen. Even when they seek to tear down older cultures, as so-called neo-minorities do to Anglo cultures, they tend to continue to use gang-banging favoritism.
I don't think there is anything supernaturally special about any particular color or ancestry. But, such aspects do seem to avail convenience for wannabe gang-bangers.
I wish an enlightened culture could move past such devices. However, the putsch to move past Anglo republics is no such an enlightenment. Rather, it has been operating merely as a putsch to install new gang-bangers. Ultimately, oligarchic gang-bangers. The default quest seems to be to devise ways for the fewest of us to farm the most of us. Our religious and spiritual leaders have so far done a poor job of inspiring us to move past that.
Absent responsible judgment among individual moral agents, every so-called scientific (liberal) pursuit of max pleasure will tend to neglect to factor the opportunity-investment cost. This is because science cannot very well factor that which was not selected. That is the job of moral judgment. As an organizing "principle," so-called "scientific" group hedonism (fake enlightenment) neglects what is necessary to raise children to become the next generation of responsible citizens. Somehow, no-harm-no-foul Libs seem always to forget about (or forfeit) the children, i.e., the generation that will be taxed to clean up their mess. Indeed, they are hardly willing to procreate. In Patton's patois, they know no more about philosophy than they know about forn ifi cat ion.
There is nothing in being black (or any other skin color), per se, that disallows a person from becoming superior in intellect, physicality, and virtue. Rather, the problem is with how the gene pool has been generally filtered. (To consider how rapidly this can alter a human gene pool, compare the history of dog breeds.)
Nor is there anything, per se, that disallows any immigrant from becoming a valued, free-thinking, competent American. Rather, the problem is with how our controllers are generally filtering the applicants.
When poor filtering of genetic and immigration pools is not sufficiently and generally opposed, every representative republic is endangered. (Note: Lest linear, one-dimensional, wussie-cretins get their panties in a bunch, I am not talking about specific or invasive genetic design. I am talking about general programs for factoring immigration and job applicants, so as to avoid the enserfing destruction of a republic.)
There is nothing morally superior or enlightening about allowing oligarchs and their Brooksian tools to swamp a republic with easily enserfed liberty-illiterates.
Of course there is an American Ideal. It is obvious to anyone who can see and think. There are millions of Americans --- of whatever color, gender, age, origin --- who value human freedom, dignity, and decency. Who value responsible parents and the Declaration of Independence. Who value the Great Commandment (good faith) and the Golden Rule (good will). Moreover, that kind of empathy is spiritually innate to the cosmos, available to all who have not allowed themselves to become blinded by rot.
Moreover, those Americans are waking up to the warped corrupti and trained ignoranti who walk among us, who want to destroy the last vestiges of representative republicanism to replace it with dystopian NWO tribalism under absolutely corrupt oligarchs, liars, perverts, child abusers, race baiters, and dividers. They are recognizing the necessity of stopping the insanity of all who are intolerant of the American Ideal. And they are waking up to the nightmare of the alternative -- which is unjust tribalism on behalf of selfish people farmers and their whiny tools.
***********
On a meta level, consciousness is consciousness. On a mortal level, "all people should be equal before the law" is something a proponent of a decent and representative republic should say. It has to do with rule under a framework of law, as opposed to rule under despots over minutiae.
In that respect, I believe in the Golden Rule and the Veil of Ignorance. But I apply them differently from most Proggies. To love your child as yourself is not to give him everything you have, but to help him learn how to become responsible for himself.
I believe in tough love. I don't believe entitlement-teaching is "love." I do not believe in trying to impose perfect equality in results, but I do believe each person should try to respect what seems to him/her be the unfolding concerns of the Reconciler.
I think human freedom and dignity necessitates that each and every subject adult learn to take subjective responsibility for his/her own pursuits, raising his/her own family, and preserving his/her own values, culture, and republic.
I believe the existence of a Source of Higher Mindedness is a Reality, under which all mortals are subject. But I believe the last thing that Source seeks is to make every human being an equal replica of every other human being. Or to dictate minutiae of diets, dress, and ceremonies. I loath the tendency towards hive-mindedness of incompetents, losers, perpetual infants, wussie-people, and conning parasites and moochers.
No comments:
Post a Comment