The Ten Commandments are an historical specification for rules of good faith and good will. A person who does not believe there abides any reality behind such rules of intuition and empathy, who believes he should instead be his own god/force seeker of pleasure, will not want any contrary moral teaching or specification to become popularized. Such incorrigible corrupti and ignoranti will celebrate when such a monument is smashed. just as they will celebrate when the faith, family, and fidelity needed to sustain a representative republic are smashed. They care not and know not what they do, because all their moral instruction comes from their hormones, children and succeeding generations be cursed.
!!!See http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/religion/rel05.html.
****************
OMG! I just got banned by snowflake know-nothings at Awkward Arguments.
Gist:
After being insulted, I returned fire. Evidently, the rules prohibit returning fire in kind against avowed agnostics, atheists, and fender fluids.
***************
Aequorea:
I'm an agnostic atheist. There's no leap of faith involved.
Dlanor:
Well, there is no coherent sense involved in your position. If no faith is involved, are you saying you know? Dang! You should write a book to reveal your great knowledge! Or maybe you have scientific proof you can submit to Michio Kaku for peer review?
What kind of agnostic are you? Are you the doubting kind, the knowing kind, or the dramatic kind? In the sense that I do not claim to know, I share some doubt. Does that make everyone who does not know but who tends to believe, an agnostic in your intended meaning? Do you have any idea what your intended meaning is?
********************
James Smith:
"I don't know -- just asking."
Well, thanks for asking. I'll tell you:
I didn't assume anything about your faith, other than that you can't force me or others to follow it. I didn't even specifically accuse YOU of attempting that.
And I am not deluded into thinking anything about a clear wall. I suggest you may be delusional in assuming that our leaders necessarily need a faith-taught morality in order to have the personal morality to justly lead us.
**************
Dlanor:
No. I am saying everyone who follows any line of morality indulges leaps of faith. I am pulling down the pants of those who pretend they don't, just because they call themselves (dramatically?) atheists of agnostics.
I am saying faith or lack of faith is not the clear line knowitall youth and stunted philosophers often think it is. To assimilate a system of manmade laws for guiding a republic, it certainly is necessary to inculcate shared moral values! (Which are often rooted in unavoidable metaphysics.)
Do you engage some superior delusion that string theory, many worlds theory, and manmade warmism alarmism are not metaphysical? Do you give the least consideration to how militant atheists, militant gays, militant child groomers, and militant monument destroyers are destabilizing the moral assimilation of the republic? Do you not think they are force-feeding their own brand of faith-taught morality (dysfunctional though it may be)?
*******************
Well, there is no coherent sense involved in your position. If no faith is involved, are you saying you know? Dang! You should write a book to reveal your great knowledge! Or maybe you have scientific proof you can submit to Michio Kaku for peer review?
What kind of agnostic are you? Are you the doubting kind, the knowing kind, or the dramatic kind? In the sense that I do not claim to know, I share some doubt. Does that make everyone who does not know but who tends to believe, an agnostic in your intended meaning? Do you have any idea what your intended meaning is?
Where did I claim to be morally superior? What I claim, Dimmy, is that a cultural assimilation of a sense of morality is essential if a representative republic is to be sustained. Learn to read.
What do you mean by personal morality? Is it like moral anarchy? Is that represented in some parade alongside the proud genitalia marchers? Do you imagine manmade laws do not take public mores and sensibilities into account?
He is a bipolar nutjob. The people celebrating are just plain nutjobs. Try again, Dimmy.
My comment is for the people who are defending and celebrating the destruction based on what they seem to take to be moral or spiritual philosophy. As for the bipolar nutjob who actually did the destruction, I will leave him to his mental wards.
My faith, properly understood, is copasetic with the faith of every decent person who believes in the representative republic. Your faith in being able to divine my faith from a single comment is incredibly shallow. Perhaps your faith is mainly in your genitalia and gratifications. I don't know -- just asking.
Btw, even a-theism entails a leap of faith. If you think a clear wall can separate what is religious or spiritual from what is morally philosophical or a proper subject for political law making, you are one very deluded puppy.
The Ten Commandments are an historical specification for rules of good faith and good will. A person who does not believe there abides any reality behind such rules of intuition and empathy, who believes he should instead be his own god/force seeker of pleasure, will not want any contrary moral teaching or specification to become popularized. Such incorrigible corrupti and ignoranti will celebrate when such a monument is smashed, just as they will celebrate when the faith, family, and fidelity needed to sustain a representative republic are smashed. They care not and know not what they do, because all their moral instruction comes from their hormones, children and succeeding generations be cursed.
Add Awkward Arguments to the passive-aggressive, pinkie-wagging, wussie list.
PRB is a place where gender-frightened militant-snowflakes, just because their glandular urges might lead them to disagree, are NOT given special license to insult people, then take umbrage against return fire in order to run non-sheeple off.
I just got banned from Awkward Arguments. it's for the best. What a place for lalalala-strawmen and wussie-know-nothings! Their idea of "being nice" is to avoid asking anyone to think beyond pc approved preconceptions. I did find one commenter there who made some excellent points. Most everyone else seemed like a pinkie-wagger. What a waste of time!
*************
Millennials have a lot of trained wussies. I can respect intelligent debate and even stupid debate that is passionate. But I loathe pinkie-wagging wussie debates. Wussie Weblogs attract pinkie-wagging atheists with repulsive avatars and Jesus-loves-gays freaks. They are more like a fast dating service for gender-fluids than a debate site. Get a load of their passive-aggressive insults, as they ban non-wussies for "not being nice." They give as much consideration to other viewpoints as the Indian got in the hanging scene in True Grit.
https://youtu.be/IFwdowLcg0M
What kind of agnostic are you? Are you the doubting kind, the knowing kind, or the dramatic kind? In the sense that I do not claim to know, I share some doubt. Does that make everyone who does not know but who tends to believe, an agnostic in your intended meaning? Do you have any idea what your intended meaning is?
Where did I claim to be morally superior? What I claim, Dimmy, is that a cultural assimilation of a sense of morality is essential if a representative republic is to be sustained. Learn to read.
What do you mean by personal morality? Is it like moral anarchy? Is that represented in some parade alongside the proud genitalia marchers? Do you imagine manmade laws do not take public mores and sensibilities into account?
He is a bipolar nutjob. The people celebrating are just plain nutjobs. Try again, Dimmy.
My comment is for the people who are defending and celebrating the destruction based on what they seem to take to be moral or spiritual philosophy. As for the bipolar nutjob who actually did the destruction, I will leave him to his mental wards.
My faith, properly understood, is copasetic with the faith of every decent person who believes in the representative republic. Your faith in being able to divine my faith from a single comment is incredibly shallow. Perhaps your faith is mainly in your genitalia and gratifications. I don't know -- just asking.
Btw, even a-theism entails a leap of faith. If you think a clear wall can separate what is religious or spiritual from what is morally philosophical or a proper subject for political law making, you are one very deluded puppy.
The Ten Commandments are an historical specification for rules of good faith and good will. A person who does not believe there abides any reality behind such rules of intuition and empathy, who believes he should instead be his own god/force seeker of pleasure, will not want any contrary moral teaching or specification to become popularized. Such incorrigible corrupti and ignoranti will celebrate when such a monument is smashed, just as they will celebrate when the faith, family, and fidelity needed to sustain a representative republic are smashed. They care not and know not what they do, because all their moral instruction comes from their hormones, children and succeeding generations be cursed.
Add Awkward Arguments to the passive-aggressive, pinkie-wagging, wussie list.
PRB is a place where gender-frightened militant-snowflakes, just because their glandular urges might lead them to disagree, are NOT given special license to insult people, then take umbrage against return fire in order to run non-sheeple off.
I just got banned from Awkward Arguments. it's for the best. What a place for lalalala-strawmen and wussie-know-nothings! Their idea of "being nice" is to avoid asking anyone to think beyond pc approved preconceptions. I did find one commenter there who made some excellent points. Most everyone else seemed like a pinkie-wagger. What a waste of time!
*************
Millennials have a lot of trained wussies. I can respect intelligent debate and even stupid debate that is passionate. But I loathe pinkie-wagging wussie debates. Wussie Weblogs attract pinkie-wagging atheists with repulsive avatars and Jesus-loves-gays freaks. They are more like a fast dating service for gender-fluids than a debate site. Get a load of their passive-aggressive insults, as they ban non-wussies for "not being nice." They give as much consideration to other viewpoints as the Indian got in the hanging scene in True Grit.
https://youtu.be/IFwdowLcg0M
No comments:
Post a Comment