Saturday, September 20, 2008

NEO-FEUHRERS



Money-Holders, acting behind humanity’s various thrones, play volatility thusly: Empower Republicans, to teach them how to whip mules to the point where they can work no harder, and then alternate, to empower Democrats, to let them learn from hard knocks why to defer to adults. Regardless, the parameters within which Republicans and Democrats are allowed to operate are regulated by a top level of Interest-Charging-Money-Holders, who need not especially empathize with the mass of humanity, but instead pursue fulfillment in a game of pursuing power over humanity.

The problem and challenge for Enlightened, Empathizing, Moderating People (aka, "Red Ass Moderates," or RAM’s) is: How best to grasp power away from power mongers, while protecting human freedom and dignity, without empowering nihilists bent on destroying earth.
NEO-FEUHRERS:

THE COMING INTERNATIONAL SOCIALISM WILL ENSLAVE EVERYONE TO BUT A FEW FEUHRERS (under which the political left becomes interchangeable with the right):
See
http://www.disneyshorts.org/years/1943/derfuehrersface.html.

At this point, I have not realistically reconciled whether it is a good or necessary thing, but I have come to believe we are looming perilously near a New World Order, where everyone will soon be a debt slave, except for puppet masters at the very top, in respect of whom our quality of life will be utterly dependent upon chance, connections, and loyalties.



The “financing” for this has already been laid before our eyes, out of thin air. The puppet masters are in place. Money: They own the main banks. Media: Few protest, because they own the main media. Indoctrination: They endow the main universities.

I see little reason to believe the puppet masters will necessarily wish to be munificent to the rest of humanity. I have not yet reconciled what can or should be done. If anything can be done, it would require far more than merely choosing between Obama and McCain (although McCain may buy more time).

************

ENSLAVEMENT TO LOAN HOLDERS --- SOCIAL DEBT THAT IS “UNSUSTAINABLE” OUTSIDE ENSLAVEMENT TO MONEY MASTERS:

Snippets from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_public_debt:

The United States total public debt, commonly called the national debt, or U.S. government debt, is the amount of money owed by the United States federal government to creditors (bankers) who hold U.S. debt instruments.

….

As of September 2008, the total U.S. federal debt was approximately $9.7 trillion, about $31,700 per capita (that is, per U.S. resident). Of this amount, debt held by the public was roughly $5.3 trillion. If, in addition, unfunded Medicaid, Social Security, Medicare, etc. promises are added, this figure rises to a total of $59.1 trillion.

….

The Government Accountability Office (GAO), Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the U.S. Treasury Department have warned that debt levels will increase dramatically relative to historical levels, due primarily to mandatory expenditures for programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and interest. Mandatory expenditures are projected to exceed federal tax revenues sometime between 2030 and 2040 if reforms are not undertaken. Further, benefits under entitlement programs will exceed government income by over $40 trillion over the next 75 years. The severity of the measures necessary to address this challenge increases the longer such changes are delayed. These organizations have stated that the government's current fiscal path is "unsustainable."

….

A traditional defense of the national debt is that Americans "owe the debt to ourselves", but that is increasingly not true. The US debt in the hands of foreign governments is 25% of the total, virtually double the 1988 figure of 13%. Despite the declining willingness of foreign investors to continue investing in US-dollar–denominated instruments as the US Dollar has fallen in 2007, the U.S. Treasury statistics indicate that, at the end of 2006, foreigners held 44% of federal debt held by the public. About 66% of that 44% was held by the central banks of other countries, in particular the central banks of Japan and China. In total, lenders from Japan and China held 47% of the foreign-owned debt. This exposure to potential financial or political risk should foreign banks stop buying Treasury securities or start selling them heavily was addressed in a recent report issued by the Bank of International Settlements which stated, "'Foreign investors in U.S. dollar assets have seen big losses measured in dollars, and still bigger ones measured in their own currency. While unlikely, indeed highly improbable for public sector investors, a sudden rush for the exits cannot be ruled out completely."

….

When the expenses of the U.S. Government exceed the revenue collected, it issues new debt to cover the deficit. This debt typically takes the form of new issues of government bonds which are sold on the open market. However, the debt can also be monetized by which the Federal Reserve creates an entry on its books to credit the US Government for an amount equal to the dollar amount of the bonds the Federal Reserve is acquiring. The money created in this process not only includes the new dollars that came into existence just to purchase the bonds, but much more because this new money is now sitting in the form of checkbook money at the Federal Reserve. Under the scheme of Fractional Reserve Banking this new checkbook money is treated as an asset to lend against. Economists estimate the expansion of the money supply as being many times the amount of the initial money created with the exact amount being a function of what percentage of deposits banks must set aside as "reserves".

The ultimate consequence of monetizing U.S. debt is that it expands the money supply which will tend to dilute the value of dollars already in circulation. Thus, expanding the pool of money puts downward pressure on the dollar, downward pressure on short-term interest rates (the banks have more to lend) and upward pressure on inflation. Typically this causes an inflationary boom that ends in a deflationary bust to complete the business cycle. Note that money supply expansion is not the only force at work in inflation or interest rates. United States Dollars are essentially a commodity on the world market and the value of the dollar at any given time is subject to the law of supply and demand. In recent years, the debt has soared and inflation has stayed relatively low in part because China has been willing to accumulate reserves denominated in U.S. Dollars. Currently, China holds over $1 trillion in dollar denominated assets (of which $330 billion are U.S. Treasury notes). In comparison, $1.4 trillion represents M1 or the "tight money supply" of U.S. Dollars which suggests that the value of the U.S. Dollar could change dramatically should China ever choose to divest itself of a large portion of those reserves.

************

FEDERAL RESERVE --- MONEY CHANGERS INEXORABLE CONTROL OVER FEDERAL RESERVE:

Federal Reserve:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Federal_Reserve_System:

Centralized banking was met with much opposition from politicians, who were suspicious of a central bank and who charged that Aldrich was biased due to his close ties to wealthy bankers such as J.P. Morgan and his daughter's marriage to John D. Rockefeller, Jr. In 1910, Aldrich and executives representing the banks of J.P. Morgan, Rockefeller, and Kuhn, Loeb & Co., secluded themselves for 10 days at Jekyll Island, Georgia. The executives included Frank A. Vanderlip, president of the National City Bank of New York, associated with the Rockefellers; Henry Davison, senior partner of J.P. Morgan Company; Charles D. Norton, president of the First National Bank of New York; and Col. Edward House, who would later become President Woodrow Wilson's closest adviser and founder of the Council on Foreign Relations. There, Paul Warburg of Kuhn, Loeb, & Co. directed the proceedings and wrote the primary features of what would be called the Aldrich Plan. Warburg would later write that "The matter of a uniform discount rate (interest rate) was discussed and settled at Jekyll Island." Vanderlip wrote in his 1935 autobiography From Farmboy to Financier:

I was as secretive, indeed I was as furtive as any conspirator. Discovery, we knew, simply must not happen, or else all our time and effort would have been wasted. If it were to be exposed that our particular group had got together and written a banking bill, that bill would have no chance whatever of passage by Congress…I do not feel it is any exaggeration to speak of our secret expedition to Jekyll Island as the occasion of the actual conception of what eventually became the Federal Reserve System.”

….

The Nebraskan populist and frequent Democratic presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan said of the plan: "Big financiers are back of the Aldrich currency scheme." He asserted that if it passed, big bankers would "then be in complete control of everything through the control of our national finances."

….

After months of hearings, amendments, and debates the Federal Reserve Act passed Congress on a Sunday two days before Christmas when most of Congress was on vacation. Years later, regarding the bill he signed into law, Wilson said, “I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world."

….

"I do not blind myself to the fact that this measure will not be effectual as a remedy for a great national evil – the concentrated control of credit...The Money Trust has not passed [died]...You rejected the specific remedies of the Pujo committee, chief among them, the prohibition of interlocking directorates. He [your enemy] will not cease fighting...at some half-baked enactment...You struck a weak half-blow, and time will show that you have lost.

….

Bryan and the agrarians wanted a government-owned central bank which could print paper money whenever Congress wanted, and thought the plan gave bankers too much power to print the government's currency. Wilson sought the advice of prominent lawyer Louis Brandeis to make the plan more amenable to the agrarian wing of the party; Brandeis agreed with Bryan. Wilson convinced them that because Federal Reserve notes were obligations of the government and because the President would appoint the members of the Federal Reserve Board, the plan fit their demands. However, Bryan soon became disillusioned with the system. In the November 1923 issue of "Hearst's Magazine" Bryan wrote that "The Federal Reserve Bank that should have been the farmer's greatest protection has become his greatest foe."

************

IVY LEAGUE MORALITY:
The financial-meltdown shenanigans of connected alumni of Ivy League schools shows their culture is rife with ethos for creating money out of thin air of elite connections, then to enforce interest from it. Some sort of evolutionary pressure is promoting those with most passion for controlling people to positions where they can control people. It is as if our current path of evolution/morphogenesis requires humanity to be reduced to a hierarchical duck line.

************

NWO AGENDA:

Snippets from
http://www.goodnewsmedia.com/bible.studies.htm/nwo.htm:
Is this scheme to establish a New World Order in fact a reality? Yes it is. If you do not believe this I encourage you to study the United Nations documents and also the treaties which, once ratified by individual nations, become INTERNATIONAL LAW. The United Nations created the Commission for Global Governance, if you don't believe this, visit the United Nations website and look it up.

{FIRST (GOVERNMENT):} The coming one world government is being set up in the political arena under the flag of the United Nations, through organizations such as the Trilateral Commission, Council of Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Bilderbergers, and the Club of Rome whose members include many world leaders, media personalities and other influential people. The published goal of the Council of Foreign Relations for example is a ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT. And although most have never heard of many of these groups, they do exist, and they are very influential. The core of these groups hold to "illuminist" philosophy.

{SECOND (MONEY CHANGING):} A second focus is ECONOMICS with FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS, the International Monetary Fund, WORLD BANK and the Bank of International Settlements. The coming global monetary crisis is intended to institute a universal debt-based currency controlled by the International Financiers and issued to individuals against biometric identification cards. This is all about control!

{THIRD (RELIGION):} The third area of focus is RELIGION. Organizations like the World Council of Churches and the Parliament of World Religions were established to introduce a new world religion. It is based on a PANTHEISTIC/humanist philosophy. Pay careful attention when you study the documents and reports published by the United Nations and related organizations. This philosophy is now being taught in the education system and has been implemented under programs such as Goals 2000.

{FOURTH (SECULAR RELIGION AND CONTROL):} The New World Order will be SOCIALISM. Read the United Nations declarations and treaties for proof of this fact. The individual will be subservient to the state. Rights and power reside in and derive from the state, not the individual. United Nations documents all speak of collectivism. They claim that private ownership and management of property is not to the benefit of the human race. These things are cloaked in a pleasant language, and most people are taken in and deceived. Yet few bother to study these documents. In the New World Order you will be in SERFDOM TO THE CONTROLLING ELITE! You will have no liberty, and no rights. The State will look after you for your best interests. Do you see how the governments of the free world are slowly becoming more involved in everyday life? This is exactly what socialism is. The government becomes involved in every aspect of personal life. Today we require a license for so many things. In Australia, farmers now require permission to farm the land they own. This is not freedom.

{FIFTH (POPULATION AND ENVIRONMENT):} Terms such as 'SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT' mean depopulation and serfdom. The masses continue to fall for lie after lie after lie. Study history and you will discover that there have been VERY FEW FREE SOCIETIES. Those that were free were either overthrown or fell into the trap of socialism, totally unaware of the dangers until it was too late. Socialism (communism) is ALWAYS IMPLEMENTED THROUGH DECEPTION. History portrays a repetitive phenomenon . . . enslavement-revolt-freedom-apathy-enslavement. Enslavement frequently followed revolution because the people did not realize that socialism was slavery, not freedom.

"The United Nations goal is to reduce population selectively by encouraging abortion, forced sterilization, and control human reproduction, and regards two-thirds of the human population as excess baggage, with 350,000 people to be eliminated per day." Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier, November 1991.


"A nation of well-informed men, who have been taught to know and prize the rights that God has given them cannot be enslaved. It is in the region of ignorance that tyranny begins!" Benjamin Franklin

.
The PRESENT ORDER IS BASED UPON CHRISTIAN PRINCIPLES. This foundation proved very successful. Contrast those nations built upon Christian foundation with nations that were established on a pagan or Islamic foundation. The Christian nations have had freedom, liberty and opportunity for all citizens, whether Christian or not. In these nations, the people have sovereign inalienable God-given rights, and government is responsible for protecting those rights. The rights of personal freedom, individual liberty and private property are granted by an authority higher than man, thus this authority cannot be overruled by men. This is the foundation upon which the United States was built. These are principles the Establishment has attempted to quash. At the other end of the spectrum we see the United Nations Charter and related documents wherein individual rights are a privilege granted by government. A big difference!!! If our individual rights are a privilege granted by the State, these individual rights can be taken away! Don't fall for the lie that they will not be. Every governing system that denies unalienable rights come from our Creator has been a system of slavery of the masses. The blood runs!
.


The Illuminati, Secret Societies and the New World Order:

The plan to establish one world government is not new. It is a long established goal of those who practice the 'Mysteries'. The Mystery Religion is the oldest of all the world's religions. In fact all the world’s religions stem from the Mysteries except true Orthodox Judaism and true Biblical Christianity. The Mystery Religion stems back to ancient Babylon. The Initiates of the Mysteries have a goal they term the 'GREAT WORK.' They hold this to be a benevolent world dictatorship. It is the sort of benevolent dictatorship Adolf Hitler wanted. Adolf Hitler was himself an Illuminist and a member of the Thule Society. The entire SS were also initiates. The 'Great Work' is a process of illuminating the human soul to a state of 'apotheosis'. It will be completed when the whole human race achieves this state. The Mysteries hold to the Platonic IDEAL WHEREIN HUMANITY IS A SINGULAR ORGANISM. Adherents view humanity as one collective being, and the individual must sacrifice for the benefit of the whole. Yet the individuals in question are you and me.

Socialism and communism have their roots in the Mystery Religion. And despite what so-called experts may say, there is little difference between socialism and communism. The U.S.S.R. stood for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

Who are these people? They are the members of all the VARIOUS SECRET SOCIETIES and fraternal organizations such as the Freemasons, Rosicrucians, Knights of Malta, Knights Templar, the Vatican and many many more. It should be stressed that the majority of the members of these secret societies are absolutely unaware of the true nature of their society, church or lodge. The HIGHER INITIATES are known as the 'adepts' or 'keepers of the secrets of all ages.' The members may belong to any religion when they join the society, yet when they reach the higher echelons and become the adepts, I assure you they all practice the same religion. One thing to remember with regards to these secret societies is that they are all the same at the higher levels. All the adepts belong collectively to what is known as the 'Illuminati' which means the 'illumined ones.' The Illuminati are those who have progressed through the various initiations in the particular branch of the Mystery Schools to which they belong until they have reached the stage of true illumination. Thus these people actually believe that what they are doing is right, just as Adolf Hitler thought that what he was doing was right and beneficial to humanity.

The ancient stories of Babylonian, Egyptian and Greek mythology have more meaning than most people realize. Archeologists and historians only see the EXOTERIC and thus miss the whole point of what it all really means. When George Bush referred to a "Thousand Points of Light" in his speech in 1991 he was using the symbolic language and was referring to the body of initiates. When Bill Clinton in his State of the Union Address was speaking of about the "setting sun and then the dawning of the new era" he was also using symbolic language. The average person heard the exoteric meanings of these statements while initiates the world over smiled to themselves, as they understood the true meaning. You see George Bush is a member of the Order of Skull and Bones Society. Bill Clinton holds the 33rd degree in the Masonic lodge. Bob Dole, a Republican, is a 33rd degree Freemason. So it DOESN’T REALLY MATTER for whom you vote, you are in effect voting for the Mysteries. These people and many others are all practitioners of the Mysteries and know exactly where the world is going. Many judges belong to secret societies. These people are everywhere and are all indoctrinated in the philosophy of the Mysteries.
In Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, the 30th to 33rd degrees are degrees of Illumination, with the 33rd being the most sought after by the 'illumined man.' The 33rd degree is the highest publicly known degree in Freemasonry. The number 33 signifies 'Illumination' and freedom from religious dogma (superstition). The human backbone contains 33 VERTEBRA with the cranium (intellect) on top.

When Adolf Hitler was building his power base in Germany some people woke up and realized what was going on. Some were sounding the alarm to what they saw happening, but these people were largely ignored. Some Jews listened and left the country. Some Germans listened and left. Those who ignored the warnings soon found themselves living in tyranny, and wondered how it could have happened. The same warning signs are being shouted from the rooftops in Australia and America today. Yet people are too busy with everyday things to stop and think. As in the 1930's, people are going to be SHOCKED when they lose their freedoms. "How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think" -- Adolf Hitler.

Every one who ignores what is going on will suffer for their indecision when plans and comfortable circumstances dissolve around them. Such people will be unable to avoid their fate because all avenues of escape will be closed. They will continue to be controlled and manipulated like a flock of sheep and know it not. They will be slaves! While those who have woken up and prepared both physically and spiritually will be in a far stronger situation, understanding what is happening and why. Troubled times will be upon us all, but is it not better to be informed and able to act, than ignorant, confused and lost?

************
.
NWO CHRONOLOGY --- Snippets from
http://www.ki4u.com/webpal/a_reconstruction/nwo/history.htm:

1922 -- December 15, 1922 -- The CFR endorses World Government in its magazine Foreign Affairs. Author Philip Kerr, states:
"Obviously there is going to be no peace or prosperity for mankind as long as [the earth] remains divided into 50 or 60 independent states until some kind of international system is created...The real problem today is that of the world government."

1933 -- The first Humanist Manifesto is published. Co-author John Dewey, the noted philosopher and educator, calls for a synthesizing of all religions and
"a socialized and cooperative economic order."

1939 -- New World Order by H. G. Wells proposes a collectivist
" one-world state" or "new world order" comprised of "socialist democracies."
He advocates "universal conscription for service" and declares that "nationalist individualism...is the world's disease."

1952 -- April 12, 1952 -- John Foster Dulles, later to become Secretary of State, says in a speech to the American Bar Association in Louisville, Kentucky, that
"treaty laws can override the Constitution."
He says treaties can take power away from Congress and give them to the President. They can take powers from the States and give them to the Federal Government or to some international body and they can cut across the rights given to the people by their constitutional Bill of Rights.

1975 -- In Congress, 32 Senators and 92 Representatives sign A Declaration of Interdependence, written by historian Henry Steele Commager. The Declaration states that:
"we must join with others to bring forth a new world order...Narrow notions of national sovereignty must not be permitted to curtail that obligation."
Congresswoman Marjorie Holt refuses to sign the Declaration saying:
"It calls for the surrender of our national sovereignty to international organizations. It declares that our economy should be regulated by international authorities. It proposes that we enter a 'new world order' that would redistribute the wealth created by the American people."

1987 -- The Secret Constitution and the Need for Constitutional Change is sponsored in part by the Rockefeller Foundation. Some thoughts of author Arthur S. Miller are:
"...a pervasive system of thought control exists in the United States...the citizenry is indoctrinated by employment of the mass media and the system of public education...people are told what to think about...the old order is crumbling...Nationalism should be seen as a dangerous social disease...A new vision is required to plan and manage the future, a global vision that will transcend national boundaries and eliminate the poison of nationalistic solutions...a new Constitution is necessary."

1991 -- October 29, 1991 -- David Funderburk, former U. S. Ambassador to Romania, tells a North Carolina audience:
"George Bush has been surrounding himself with people who believe in one-world government. They believe that the Soviet system and the American system are converging."
The vehicle to bring this about, said Funderburk, is the United Nations, "the majority of whose 166 member states are socialist, atheist, and anti-American."

************

BRAZEN REFERENCES FROM YOU TUBE AND WIKIPEDIA:

Secret Government --
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sstDwKTCpM
NWO push to International Socialism --http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPU8w7Bxc0A
CFR -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPlvdSQ6cAM;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQZ56hkKOlk.
Bilderberg --
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EE22Ak03.html; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg:
Critics claim the Bilderberg Group promotes the careers of politicians whose views are representative of the interests of multinational corporations, at the expense of democracy.
….
The best known was Phyllis Schlafly's "A Choice, Not an Echo" which suggested a conspiracy theory in which the Republican Party was secretly controlled by elitist intellectuals dominated by members of the Bilderberger group, whose policies would pave the way for global communist conquest. Schlafly's husband Fred had been a lecturer at Schwartz's local Christian anti-communism Crusade conferences."

Rothschild --
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Rothschild.
The acclaimed poet Ezra Pound, in his World War II radio broadcasts from Italy, openly named the Rothschilds as the masters of a clique of banking houses that caused the World Wars in order to profit from them and get countries in debt to the lending central banks, which Pound claimed the Rothschild interests owned and exercised control of a nation's policy by having the power to issue the nation's money.

George Carlin --
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYIC0eZYEtI
Federal Reserve -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Federal_Reserve_System
Big Gainers -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LX2DgN1VYgQ
Who gained -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCLak2IfIsI
Profiting from crash -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmIennSKyOk
Using home as ATM -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWoobmHwJ6U
Unsustainable Debt -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGaXnAAAZXA
Hold On -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MilR1seLH5Y
Ivy League grade inflation (it’s not about substantive learning; it’s about connections and world view conditioning) --http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/perspectives/sub.asp?key=244&subkey=99&view_all=true.

************

SO, WHAT CAN OR SHOULD “RED ASS MODERATES” DO ???
Anyone? Anyone
?

Friday, September 19, 2008

Ivy League Moral Compass


Moral compass
Originally uploaded by lindamccraven

(Click title above)

.


HOW TO TELL IF YOU’RE AN ELITIST
— SEE http://townhall.com/Columnists/BenShapiro/2008/10/21/you_know_youre_an_elitist_if.

.

Ivy League Moral Compass:

REGAINING
SPIRITUAL BALANCE
AND MORAL DIRECTION:


America’s disproportionate prison population is symptomatic of our loss of moral balance and of mutual faith and credit. If we fail to regain balance, we, and our currency, will soon fall into something that is no longer American.

We will not regain balance by deriding all dedication to any stabilizing value or belief system that is higher than all of us. Ivy League institutions of science and hallowed institutions of organized religion are all failing us.

Yet, above all is a Compass of Spirituality. Of IT, we deride common respect at our common moral and mortal peril.


****

Snippets and comment from:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/mistress_of_disaster_jamie_gor.html:

September 19, 2008
Mistress of Disaster: Jamie Gorelick
By C. Edmund Wright


Imagine playing a central role in the biggest national defense disaster in 50 years. Imagine playing a central role in one of the biggest economic disasters in your country's history. Imagine doing both as an un-elected official. Imagine getting filthy rich in the process, and even being allowed to sit self-righteously on a commission appointed to get to the bottom of the first disaster, which of course did not get to the bottom of that disaster or anything else for that matter.


Imagine ending, ruining or at least causing significant quality deterioration in the lives of millions of people, most of whom will never know your name. Imagine counting your millions of dollars while people who tried to stop you from causing all this mayhem were getting blamed for most of the ills you actually contributed to.


Well, as un-imaginable as this is, there is one American who doesn't have to imagine it. One Jamie Gorelick is this American. And without pretending that she caused the loss of countless thousands of lives and countless billions of dollars of wealth by herself, she certainly did push some of the early domino's in catastrophic chain events that are a major factors in life in America today.

....

From what can be gleaned, it all comes from being well connected. She was educated (is that what they call it?) at Harvard undergrad and Harvard Law. From there, she kept getting appointed to positions above her experience level where she could flex her liberal muscles, add a resume item, and move upward.


Sound familiar?


Commenter — STIII:

The number of dishonest, deplorable, despicable dirtbags that come out of Ivy League schools would be impressive if it wasn't so destructive. Don't these institutions teach any morals, scruples or self worth? This woman was at the center of the worst attack this country has suffered, got payed 75 million for her "work" sending Fannie Mae into oblivion at tax payer expense and then the dog and pony show called the 911 commission. Where's the accountability? Why doesn't this woman go see a Judge and a Jury? Instead, she just gets a pass. The leadership we get out of the lawyers that are Democrat politicians is going to ruin this country. They can't lead, but they know the law just well enough to skate around it.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Anekāntavāda


Objectivists, Scientists, and Empiricists may say we do not need religion or spirituality to inspire or derive “oughts.” Rather, they may say we can derive or agree upon ethics for guiding what we should choose to do, based purely on rationality and empiricism, free of spiritual intuition or passion.

OK, say I: Name one such derivation. OK, may say the Objectivist: We should condition and inculcate those familial habits that are conducive to sustaining a flourishing civilization. OK, say I: I agree. But how do you derive the “should” of that, based only on logic and/or empiricism?

How and why do you prove or reason that we “should” condition habits conducive to a “flourishing” “civilization”? Specifically, how should we “scientifically” best design, change, or “advance” bodies for the members of such civilization? How should we scientifically design laws, rules, arts, and deceits that should govern and enrich interrelations among members of such civilization?

Must not every so-called “Objectivist” “derive” and choose “shoulds” in respect of Something not completely definable in logic or empiricism?

Why, then, persecutist thou “God”?
****
Jainism, Anekāntavāda, and Enlightened Empathy:
Money-Holders, acting behind humanity’s various thrones, play volatility thusly: Empower Republicans, to teach them how to whip mules to the point where they can work no harder, and then alternate, to empower Democrats, to let them learn from hard knocks why to defer to adults. Regardless, the parameters within which Republicans and Democrats are allowed to operate are regulated by a top level of Interest-Charging-Money-Holders, who need not especially empathize with the mass of humanity, but instead pursue fulfillment in a game of pursuing power over humanity.
The problem and challenge for Enlightened, Empathizing, Moderating People (aka, "Red Ass Moderates," or RAM’s) is: How best to dissolve monopolized power of power mongers, while protecting human freedom and dignity, without empowering nihilists bent on destroying earth.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anekantavada:
“Proponents of anekāntavāda apply this principle to religion and philosophy, reminding themselves that any religion or philosophy … that clings too dogmatically to its own tenets, is committing an error based on its limited point of view.”
….
The Sanskrit compound an-eka-anta-vāda literally means "doctrine of non-exclusivity"; it is translated into English as "scepticism" or "non-absolutism".
….
The age of Māhavīra and Buddha was an age of intense intellectual debates, especially on the nature of reality and self. The Vedānta school represented by advaitins postulated the absolute unchanging reality of Brahman and atman and claimed that change was mere illusion. The theory advanced by Buddhists denied the reality of permanence and absolute truths, affirming change as the only reality. According to the Vedānta conceptual scheme, the Buddhists were wrong in denying permanence and absolutism, and within the Buddhist conceptual scheme, the advaitas were wrong in denying the reality of change. The two positions were contradictory and mutually exclusive from each others' point of view. The Jains managed a synthesis of the two uncompromising positions with anekāntavāda. From the perspective of a higher, inclusive level made possible by the ontology and epistemology of anekāntavāda and syādvāda, Jains do not see such claims as contradictory or mutually exclusive; instead, they are seen as ekantika or only partially true. The Jain breadth of vision embraces the perspectives of both Vedānta, which, according to Jainism, "recognizes substances but not process", and Buddhism, which "recognizes process but not substance". Jainism, on the other hand, pays equal attention to both substance (dravya) and process (paryaya).
Māhavīra's responses to various questions asked by his disciples and recorded in the Jain canon Bhagvatisūtra demonstrate a recognition that there are complex and multiple aspects to truth and reality and a mutually exclusive approach cannot be taken to explain such reality ….
….
According to Jainism, even a Tīrthaṇkara, who possesses and perceives infinite knowledge, cannot express reality completely because of the limitations of language, which is of human creation.
….
This philosophical syncretisation of paradox of change through anekānta has been acknowledged by modern scholars such as Arvind Sharma, who wrote:
Our experience of the world presents a profound paradox which we can ignore existentially, but not philosophically. This paradox is the paradox of change. Something – A changes and therefore it cannot be permanent. On the other hand, if A is not permanent, then what changes? In this debate between the 'permanence' and 'change', Hinduism seems more inclined to grasp the first horn of the dilemma and Buddhism the second. It is Jainism that has the philosophical courage to grasp both horns fearlessly and simultaneously, and the philosophical skill not to be gored by either.
….
Anekāntavāda is non-absolutist and stands firmly against all dogmatisms, including any assertion that Jainism is the only correct religious path.
….
In anekāntavāda, there is no "battle of ideas", because this is considered to be a form of intellectual himsa or violence, leading quite logically to physical violence and war. In today's world, the limitations of the adversarial, "either with us or against us" form of argument are increasingly apparent by the fact that the argument leads to political, religious and social conflicts. Sūtrakrtānga, the second oldest canon of Jainism, provides a solution by stating:"Those who praise their own doctrines and ideology and disparage the doctrine of others distort the truth and will be confined to the cycle of birth and death."
….
According to Gandhi, a satyagrahi is duty bound to act according to his relative truth, but at the same time, he is also equally bound to learn from truth held by his opponent.
….
I am an Advaitist and yet I can support Dvaitism (dualism). The world is changing every moment, and is therefore unreal, it has no permanent existence. But though it is constantly changing, it has a something about it which persists and it is therefore to that extent real. I have therefore no objection to calling it real and unreal, and thus being called an Anekāntavadi or a Syādvadi. But my Syādvāda is not the Syādvāda of the learned, it is peculiarly my own. I cannot engage in a debate with them. It has been my experience that I am always true from my point of view, and am often wrong from the point of view of my honest critics. I know that we are both right from our respective points of view. And this knowledge saves me from attributing motives to my opponents or critics. The seven blind men who gave seven different descriptions of the elephant were all right from their respective points of view, and wrong from the point of view of one another, and right and wrong from the point of view of the man who knew the elephant. I very much like this doctrine of the manyness (sic) of reality. It is this doctrine that has taught me to judge a Musulman (sic) from his standpoint and a Christian from his. Formerly I used to resent the ignorance of my opponents. Today I can love them because I am gifted with the eye to see myself as others see me and vice versa. I want to take the whole world in the embrace of my love. My Anekāntavāda is the result of the twin doctrine of Satyagraha and ahiṃsā.
….
It is argued that if reality is so complex that no single doctrine can describe it adequately, then anekāntavāda itself, being a single doctrine, must be inadequate. This criticism seems to have been anticipated by Ācārya Samantabhadra who said: "From the point of view of pramana (means of knowledge) it is anekānta (multi-sided), but from a point of view of naya (partial view) it is ekanta (one-sided)."
In defense of the doctrine, Jains point out that anekāntavāda seeks to reconcile apparently opposing viewpoints rather than refuting them.
[Criticism:] The result of your efforts is perfect knowledge and is not perfect knowledge. Observation shows that, only when a course of action is known to have a definite result, people set about it without hesitation. Hence a man who proclaims a doctrine of altogether indefinite contents dose not deserve to be listened anymore than a drunken or a mad man.

*****

PERSONAL COMMENTS:
1) “The result of your efforts” need not be taken as perfect knowledge or as non-perfect knowledge, but as an appreciation of spiritual aspects of “Will,” beyond physics and logic. Insofar as “Will” is meant as label for ultimate source, whatever it may be, obviously, neither it, nor anything superior to it, can be used, logically, to explain why it should exist or from whence it came.
2) The purpose of such efforts need not be to advance knowledge of physics, especially inasmuch as such efforts may suppose physics, ultimately, as to be beyond knowledge, but, rather, existing only derivatively, as mathematically related illusion, useful for entertaining perspectives of Will.
3) Assuming that physics, ultimately, is merely useful illusion, derivative of mathematical relations among perspectives of Will, need do no violence to practical, here and now investigations and measurements of the mathematical relations that delimit the common universe of holography in respect of which our perspectives relate and communicate among themselves.
4) Being skeptical of the possibility of any perfect explanation or knowledge of physics need do no violence to scientific pursuits for harnessing practical relations that manifest to our shared holographic experience.
5) The notion of anekāntavāda may help one rationalize or appreciate a moral sense, such as enlightened empathy. It need not be applied to any particular purpose of science or logical proof.
6) Such notion may help us rationalize a common way for communicating hope, faith, trust, and Enlightened Empathy.
7) Even so, trust is best based on character, as evidenced by deeds, which require choices, which require “either-or” types of thinking and decisions.
8) Even appreciating anekāntavāda, one must still make practical moral choices.
9) In common respect of anekāntavāda, actors may at least approach their interactions in hope of mutually respectful resolutions of differences, even if verbal negotiations must sometimes seem to need to be continued in interstices of active, albeit, LIMITED WAR.

.
*****
.

Physics As An Ultimate Bookkeeping Trick:

The Stuff that manifests to us as matter, energy, space, and time seems to have derived, and in its interrelations, continues to derive out of, or in respect of, an “Original, Ultimate, or Superior Source of Somethingness” — either “Will of God” or “Paradox of Nothingness” (or virtual particles or apparitions, appearing as tricks, out of otherwise nothingness).

Intuitively, the manifesting, physical stuff we measurably and mathematically experience emerges or derives out of and/or in respect of an “Ultimate Source” that is beyond our measure or math. We may be faithfully receptive to intuit IT and/or to respect IT, but we cannot measure IT or deal with IT empirically or scientifically. We may intuit that what seems to be manifest and physical may, in relation to IT, be some mere trick of math or imagination in respect of IT. That is, all that we empirically experience may be product of Bookkeeping-Trick-Of-Currency or perspective (or faith, credit, trust) of Will-To-Math.
.
****
Moral Empathy for Machine Intelligence ---
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE:
Snippets from http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/industry/4287680.html?series=60:

"The first real AI would be something that we don't even understand," says Wright, "because we didn't program it. It will be more dissimilar in the way it thinks, than we are to a mouse."

….

There's no sense of alarm in Wright's voice when he describes this self-refining machine intelligence—no more than when he casually mentions the notion that, as technology progresses at an exponentially faster rate, towards the so-called singularity, any number of breakthroughs could, as he puts it, "cause the world to go extremely non-linear." When he provides, as classic examples, a computer AI taking over the world, or self-propagating nanobots turning everything into a grey goo, it's impossible to tell whether he's joking, or worried, or simply fascinated. But when he's asked whether that hyper-advanced AI would retain its knowledge of humanity, Wright says, "I would imagine that it can understand us. But the really scary part of this is that we don't know."
.
Comment abouot Anekāntavāda:
The concept of anekāntavāda seems not altogether dissimilar from Soros' notion (and rather unprincipled use of) of "reflexity," as well as Godel's theorem of incompleteness. Every mortal perspective has its imperfection, or Achilles heel. What helps see us through, morally, is judgment availed of insight, informed not just in book learning or in personal will to power, but through humble, empathetic appreciation and experience of a variety of perspectives. Effete elites twist to ignore as much, at their peril.

NEO-FEUDALISM


(Click title above)

.

Unprecedented Bailout:

Snippet from http://moneynews.newsmax.com/streettalk/ben_stein_wall_street/2008/09/22/133078.html?s=al&promo_code=6AFA-1:

Ben Stein, economist, author, former presidential speechwriter, and occasional actor is angry about the current economic earthquake that has rattled U.S. and global markets and he wants everyone to know.
He's particularly peeved with the $700 billion proposed Wall Street bailout and its architect, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson.
In a CNN interview, Stein said Paulson should be "fired yesterday."
Paulson is a disgrace to the Republican Party and to his country, said Stein. Another target of Stein's ire is Wall Street itself.
Stein says he'd like to see President Bush on national TV "with Mr. Obama to his left and Mr. McCain to his right and say we are going to make sure that you Americans are going to stop being looted by Wall Street."
“It's a first-class disaster. The worst Treasury regulation of the economy in my lifetime. ... The effect of this on the ordinary investor and pre-retiree ... is just catastrophic for the free enterprise system."

See also http://moneynews.newsmax.com/.


****

N.W.O. EQUALS NEO-FEUDALISM:

CONSPIRACY SPECULATION:

The driving force to globalism is international socialism, subject to near total control by those entrenched at the helm. The key here is not the socialist aspect, but the totalitarian control aspect. The socialist aspect is wolf-in-sheep’s-clothing, luring us to totalitarianism.

As taxpayers and citizens underwrite the solvency of large financial institutions, many at their helm milk sustenance not from their own work but from the rest of society’s payments of interest on such obligations.

Major shenanigans fit neatly, hand in glove, with a pre-plan for transitioning to neo-feudalism.

The present financial meltdown occurred as a result of putting Ponzi incentives in place to promote a pyramid of unsustainable housing loans. From there, a direct line connects the need for society as a whole to undertake to guarantee solvency for variously involved financial institutions.

Society, indeed, much of the world, having been led to volunteer for such undertaking, has been led to volunteer for serfdom, to enrich and empower those entrenched at highest levels to hold claims to interest, perhaps beyond scale.

At breath taking pace, we are being reduced not to co-masters of our social community, but to debt-slaves to those masters who hold rights to collect interest on the most superior loans.

The world is being reduced to three totalitarian-socialist sectors: Communist Sector, Islamofascism Sector, and Social Business Sector. Are/will the eventual heads of such sectors meet and serve the same “Third Foundation”?


Monday, September 15, 2008

Globalist Gamers


Atlas Shrugged
Originally uploaded by ArtWerk

(Click title above)

.

Uber-Nomenklatura (International Pirates of Opportunity):
For "Ultimate Play On Volatility" (to consolidate rule of Uber-Nomenklatura), see http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/10/bidens_generated_crisis.html.

.

GLOBALIST GAMERS:

How and why have we come to elect Gobalist-Sell-Outs to entrust so much of our national security in respect of soundness of defense secrets, currency, economy, business, and infrastructure to international brokers of wealth and power, who play on volatility, mass distortion, differentiation frenzy, debt-enslavement, and terror-control of everyday people?

Why is no politician addressing HOW WE SHOULD REGAIN NATIONAL CONTROL over the internationalists who do business within our borders?

Why have we turned a blind eye to the financial enslaving of Western Civilization to Eastern Communitarianism?

Why does not America impose more export taxes against corporations that export vital and limited American resources?

Why have we empowered high rollers at highest levels to engross us so deeply in gaming mass distortion, differentiation frenzy, and social volatility?

Why have we failed by tax policy to discourage short term speculation and to encourage long term investment?

Why have we allowed Democrats to buffalo us, to toss measured loan making judgments to the winds, merely to avoid the falsely derisive, race-baiting complaints of Ponzi-Artists regarding redlining of loan applications?

Why have we allowed energy to be sucked out of inclinations for planning ahead?

Why have made so little effort to spare the hoi polloi from harsh corrections and hangovers that inevitably assault us after cumulative insults to environment, posterity, and our own civilizing decency?

****

HERD-MINDED POLITICAL CORRECTNESS:

How our Saudi “friends” use a cousin of political correctness against us in order to leverage political control through terrorism ---

See http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/15/opinion/15mon4.html?th&emc=th “Libel Tourism’ “Libel Tourism’:

When Freedom of Speech Takes a Holiday

By ADAM COHEN

Published: September 14, 2008

When Rachel Ehrenfeld wrote “Funding Evil: How Terrorism Is Financed and How to Stop It,” she assumed she would be protected by the First Amendment. She was, in the United States. But a wealthy Saudi businessman she accused in the book of being a funder of terrorism, Khalid bin Mahfouz, sued in Britain, where the libel laws are heavily weighted against journalists, and won a sizable amount of money.

....

The upshot is a First Amendment loophole. In the Internet age, almost every American book can be bought in Britain. That means American authors are subject to being sued under British libel law, which in some cases puts the initial burden on the defendant to prove the truth of what she has written. British libel law is so tilted against writers that the United Nations Human Rights Committee criticized it last month for discouraging discussion of important matters of public interest.

Mr. bin Mahfouz, who has denied financing terrorism, said Ms. Ehrenfeld’s book contained inaccuracies and demanded a retraction. He also demanded a significant contribution to a charity of his choice — a charity Ms. Ehrenfeld said she feared would be one with ties to terrorism.

Ms. Ehrenfeld, who describes herself as being “in the business of stopping people who fund terrorism,” refused to back down. “I said,” she later recalled, “he’s found the wrong victim.” Ms. Ehrenfeld rallied prominent champions of free speech to her cause, including the American Library Association, the Association of American Publishers and the PEN American Center. She also set to work trying to change American law. The New York State Legislature passed a bill that some are calling “Rachel’s law,” which blocks enforcement of libel judgments from countries that provide less free-speech protection than the United States. Gov. David Paterson signed it on May 1.

A similar, bipartisan bill has been introduced in Congress. The federal bill would extend protection to the entire country. It would also allow American authors and publishers to countersue, and if a jury found that the foreign suit was an attempt to suppress protected speech, it could award treble damages. There is little opposition to it — and Congress should pass it before it adjourns later this month.

"Libel tourism” is a threat to America’s robust free-speech traditions, which protect authors here. If foreign libel judgments can be enforced in American courts, there will be a “race to the bottom”; writers will only have as much protection as the least pro-free-speech nations allow.

....

The result is what lawyers call a “chilling effect” — authors and publishers may avoid taking on some subjects, or challenging powerful interests. That has already been happening in Britain. Craig Unger’s “House of Bush, House of Saud: The Secret Relationship Between the World’s Two Most Powerful Dynasties” was a best seller in the United States. But its British publisher canceled plans to publish the book, reportedly out of fear of being sued. (A smaller publisher later released it.)

Britain should rethink its libel laws, as the U.N. committee urged, for the sake of its citizens. But until it does, the United States should ensure that other countries’ pro-plaintiff libel laws do not infect this country and diminish our proud tradition of freedom of expression.

****

GLOBAL WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/15/opinion/15cohen.html?th&emc=th: Premiumize or Perish

By ROGER COHEN

Published: September 14, 2008

Wealth is not so much diminishing, although it certainly looks that way right now on Wall Street, as it is shifting to emergent recession-resilient elites in places like Russia, China, India, Dubai and Brazil. They want the same status symbols and brands the world over.

****

SLAVES TO GREED:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/15/opinion/15krugman.html?ref=opinion:

Financial Russian Roulette

By PAUL KRUGMAN

Published: September 14, 2008

Will the U.S. financial system collapse today, or maybe over the next few days? I don’t think so — but I’m nowhere near certain.

....

To understand the problem, you need to know that the old world of banking, in which institutions housed in big marble buildings accepted deposits and lent the money out to long-term clients, has largely vanished, replaced by what is widely called the “shadow banking system.”

....

The new system was supposed to do a better job of spreading and reducing risk. But in the aftermath of the housing bust and the resulting mortgage crisis, it seems apparent that risk wasn’t so much reduced as hidden: all too many investors had no idea how exposed they were.

....

But the consequences of those rescues are making officials nervous. For one thing, they’re taking big risks with taxpayer money. For example, today much of the Fed’s portfolio is tied up in loans backed by dubious collateral. Also, officials are worried that their rescue efforts will encourage even more risky behavior in the future. After all, it’s starting to look as if the rule is heads you win, tails the taxpayers lose.

....

The real answer to the current problem would, of course, have been to take preventive action before we reached this point. Even leaving aside the obvious need to regulate the shadow banking system — if institutions need to be rescued like banks, they should be regulated like banks — why were we so unprepared for this latest shock?

****

RETURN OF FEAR:

See http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/15/business/15street.html?em:

Nation’s Financial Industry Gripped by Fear

By BEN WHITE and JENNY ANDERSON

Published: September 14, 2008

****

See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9P15YZrnv0; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9g1UtFDytfk; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNIgkaqh-oM;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_z1-Gx9hWcY;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0G1fNjK9SXg.


Sunday, September 14, 2008

Role of Independents



(Click title above )

.

TASK FOR INDEPENDENTS — DO NOT TRUST IVY LEAGUERS:

Ivy league Republicans (George Will , David Brooks , Peggy Noonan, Christopher Buckley, and Kathleen Parker and war cheering Democrats (led by Christopher Hitchens ) are acting out against Sarah Palin. Why?

Might war-cheering Democrats, in light of the financial meltdown brought on by excessive Big Government, now long for less international activity by the U.S.? Might ivy league Republicans, ruing Big Government, now prefer that Democrats be elected to suffer blame for mismanaging any recovery? Might ivy league Republicans also fear hints of common sense in Sarah Palin, as if she may dare to question blue blood Republican rationalizations of outrageously disproportionate allocations of wealth, nearing levels of Mexico? On social issues, might blue-blood, self-ingratiating Republicans be more aligned with far left Democrats?

If so, consider:
1) Is the threat of Islamofascist pursuit of nuclear dissemination substantial? If so, compare the costs of retreat.
2) Are ivy leaguers conditioned to “justify” their hiring out to help in the farming of all other Americans, as if we should be reduced to be satisfied with chicken feed? If so, why?

Bottom Line: Look behind the words of “elites;” consider who and what they work for and stand for; do not just assume their “educations” are grounded in fellow-empathy or in good judgment derivative of actual experience. Do not just assume their words are grounded in wisdom as opposed to shallow opportunism.

.
****

Money-Holders, acting behind humanity’s various thrones, play volatility thusly: Empower Republicans, to teach them how to whip mules to the point where they can work no harder, and then alternate, to empower Democrats, to let them learn from hard knocks why to defer to adults. Regardless, the parameters within which Republicans and Democrats are allowed to operate are regulated by a top level of Interest-Charging-Money-Holders, who need not especially empathize with the mass of humanity, but instead pursue fulfillment in a game of pursuing power over humanity.

The problem and challenge for Enlightened, Empathizing, Moderating People (aka, "Red Ass Moderates," or RAM’s) is: How best to grasp power away from power mongers, while protecting human freedom and dignity, without empowering nihilists bent on destroying earth.


Role of Independents (and Red Ass Moderates):


Debate helps to clarify ideas. Opposing advocates and parties are necessary to spirited debate. More than two parties tends to undermine focused elections. Having only two parties encourages covering-over deal-making for fringe special interests, leaving wallflower Independents, often, to be the last ones to be wooed. Independents often have at heart the best interests of the country as a whole. For the country to be served, and for Independents not to be treated as wallflowers, Independents must get assertive, early.


Moderates must get the Red Ass!


Moderates must actively monitor political shenanigans.


Moderates must make evil doings of evil doers famous.


Moderates must sponsor responsible candidates.


Requisite to their loyalty and energy, Moderates must demand responsible governance.


Moderates must rationalize a uniting philosophy of decent governance.


Moderates must teach us to coalesce in support of a uniting philosophy of decent governance.



****


Snippets from http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0908/13427.html:
Independents swing toward McCain
By JOHN P. AVLON
9/14/08

Since the GOP convention and his selection of the Alaska governor as his running mate, McCain has changed a months-long tie among independents into a 52 to 37 percent advantage. Support for McCain among self-described "conservative Democrats" has jumped 10 points, to 25 percent, signaling the shift among swing voters to McCain.
….
The Bush administration is deeply disliked by many independents and centrists because they feel duped. Bush campaigned in 2000 with an explicitly centrist message as a “compassionate conservative,” but he governed as a polarizing partisan conservative.
While most independents can be described as fiscally conservative and socially liberal, the Bush administration has been the opposite: fiscally liberal and socially conservative.

Obama’s campaign is confronting a political reality that Democrats have a difficult time dealing with: that America is essentially a center-right nation. Winning a national election comes down to winning over independents and centrists in swing states.

And the professional partisans in the Republican Party needs to appreciate that John McCain is leading a broader resurgence of the Republican brand because of his independence, not in spite of it.

Inherent Purpose




(Click title above)

Inherent Purpose:

INHERENT PURPOSE:

Snippets from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purpose :
“Renowned psychiatrist Victor Frankl’s premise is that ‘man’s search for meaning’ is the primary motivation of his life. He speaks of the ‘will to meaning’ as opposed to Freud’s’ ‘will to pleasure’ and Friedrich Nietzsche’s ‘will to power’.
….
With teleology (purpose) matter is fulfilling some aim from within.”

****
From
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holography:
“Holography … is a technique that allows the light scattered from an object to be recorded and later reconstructed so that it appears as if the object is in the same position relative to the recording medium as it was when recorded. The image changes as the position and orientation of the viewing system changes in exactly the same way as if the object were still present, thus making the recorded image (hologram) appear three dimensional. Holograms can also be made using other types of waves.”

****

I suspect or intuit:

Holography consists in incomplete perspectives or interpretations of patterns of Holism.

Elements are nothing but wave patterns within mathematical holographies, which are amenable to common interaction, detection, or sensation among such other patterns as are sympathetic (or empathetic) to their reception in kind.

Were there absolutely no capacity of Will to apprehend such patterns, there would be no patterns or “physical elements” at all.

Every holography exists in respect of a community of shared perspective (or willing mass illusion) of relatable patterns.

Such holographic communities of pattern-perspectives exist for the purpose of entertaining Holistic Will, whose facilitations at the nexus between spiritual Holism and mortal Holography we may intuit, but never quantify.

Each Perspective of Holistic-Willful-Mind has purpose: To morph-evolve-change in pursuit of ever more fulfilling, synchronous, apprehensions of patterns of holographies for artistically expressing communities and civilizations of consciousness.
Thus, our purpose may be this artistically circular: to pursue purpose.
A fundamental aspect about the art of such purposefulness is intuitable:
Each of us should pursue spiritual idealization for civilization that can be stable, sustainable, and amenable of superior surpassage.

Such inherent or circular purposefulness is restless, such that no form of Will or civilization is permitted to stand still or to forego change or choice.

Of each form of conscious Will: Use it or lose it ... to a different form!

WORLD VIEW:

Until such time as it becomes reasonably feasible to transition to global government, each nation, within its borders, is challenged to make "international" corporations behave sufficiently "patriotically" so as not to incite grossly counterproductive responses from other nations or corporations.

****

Dean Acheson: "No people in history have ever survived, who thought they could protect their freedom by making themselves inoffensive to their enemies."
Comment: As a defensive answer, making ourselves inoffensive is a recipe for defeat, being sponsored by the Party of Defeat --- Democrats.

Sarah Palin: "... Newsflash: ... I’m not going to Washington D.C. to seek their good opinion. I’m going to Washington to serve the people of this great country!"