Sunday, September 14, 2008

Inherent Purpose




(Click title above)

Inherent Purpose:

INHERENT PURPOSE:

Snippets from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purpose :
“Renowned psychiatrist Victor Frankl’s premise is that ‘man’s search for meaning’ is the primary motivation of his life. He speaks of the ‘will to meaning’ as opposed to Freud’s’ ‘will to pleasure’ and Friedrich Nietzsche’s ‘will to power’.
….
With teleology (purpose) matter is fulfilling some aim from within.”

****
From
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holography:
“Holography … is a technique that allows the light scattered from an object to be recorded and later reconstructed so that it appears as if the object is in the same position relative to the recording medium as it was when recorded. The image changes as the position and orientation of the viewing system changes in exactly the same way as if the object were still present, thus making the recorded image (hologram) appear three dimensional. Holograms can also be made using other types of waves.”

****

I suspect or intuit:

Holography consists in incomplete perspectives or interpretations of patterns of Holism.

Elements are nothing but wave patterns within mathematical holographies, which are amenable to common interaction, detection, or sensation among such other patterns as are sympathetic (or empathetic) to their reception in kind.

Were there absolutely no capacity of Will to apprehend such patterns, there would be no patterns or “physical elements” at all.

Every holography exists in respect of a community of shared perspective (or willing mass illusion) of relatable patterns.

Such holographic communities of pattern-perspectives exist for the purpose of entertaining Holistic Will, whose facilitations at the nexus between spiritual Holism and mortal Holography we may intuit, but never quantify.

Each Perspective of Holistic-Willful-Mind has purpose: To morph-evolve-change in pursuit of ever more fulfilling, synchronous, apprehensions of patterns of holographies for artistically expressing communities and civilizations of consciousness.
Thus, our purpose may be this artistically circular: to pursue purpose.
A fundamental aspect about the art of such purposefulness is intuitable:
Each of us should pursue spiritual idealization for civilization that can be stable, sustainable, and amenable of superior surpassage.

Such inherent or circular purposefulness is restless, such that no form of Will or civilization is permitted to stand still or to forego change or choice.

Of each form of conscious Will: Use it or lose it ... to a different form!

WORLD VIEW:

Until such time as it becomes reasonably feasible to transition to global government, each nation, within its borders, is challenged to make "international" corporations behave sufficiently "patriotically" so as not to incite grossly counterproductive responses from other nations or corporations.

****

Dean Acheson: "No people in history have ever survived, who thought they could protect their freedom by making themselves inoffensive to their enemies."
Comment: As a defensive answer, making ourselves inoffensive is a recipe for defeat, being sponsored by the Party of Defeat --- Democrats.

Sarah Palin: "... Newsflash: ... I’m not going to Washington D.C. to seek their good opinion. I’m going to Washington to serve the people of this great country!"

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Snippet from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/18/opinion/18cohen.html?th&emc=th:

College seniors might start by reading “A New Bank to Save Our Infrastructure” in the current edition of The New York Review of Books, an impassioned plea from Felix Rohatyn (who knows something of financial rescues) and Everett Ehrlich for the creation of a National Infrastructure Bank, or N.I.B.
Its aim, at a time when the Chinese are investing $200 billion in railways and building 97 new airports, would be to use public and private capital to give coherence to a vast program of public works. “This can improve productivity, fight unemployment and raise our standard of living,” Rohatyn told me.
It’s absurd that earmarks — the self-interested budgetary foibles of senators and representatives — should dictate the progressive dilapidation of America. How can the commonwealth thrive when its bridges sag, its levees cede, its public transport creaks?
So, young minds, sign up for the N.I.B.! Before doing so, read Nick Taylor’s stirring “American-Made: The Enduring Legacy of the W.P.A.: When F.D.R. Put the Nation to Work.” It shows how the Works Progress Administration, a linchpin of Roosevelt’s New Deal, put millions of unemployed to work on dams, airports and the like. It’s a book about how imaginative political leadership can rally a nation in crisis.

****

Snippet from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/18/opinion/18kristof.html?th&emc=th:

But one of our broad national problems is rising inequality, and it is exacerbated by corporate executives helping themselves to shareholders’ cash. Three decades ago, C.E.O.’s typically earned 30 to 40 times the income of ordinary workers. Last year, C.E.O.’s of large public companies averaged 344 times the average pay of workers.
John McCain seems to think that the problem is that C.E.O.’s are greedy. Well, of course, they are. We’re all greedy. The real failure is one of corporate governance, which provides only the flimsiest oversight to curb the greed of executives like Mr. Fuld.
Compare the massive destruction of wealth for shareholders to what he gets at the end of the day,” said Lucian Bebchuk, the director of the corporate governance program at Harvard Law School. A central flaw of governance is that boards of directors frequently are ornamental and provide negligible oversight.
As Warren Buffett has said, “in judging whether corporate America is serious about reforming itself, C.E.O. pay remains the acid test.” It’s a test that corporate America is failing.
....
These Brobdingnagian paychecks are partly the result of taxpayer subsidies. A study released a few weeks ago by the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington found five major elements in the tax code that encourage overpaying executives. These cost taxpayers more than $20 billion a year.

Anonymous said...

True Neo-Conservatism:

We have spiritual, religious, individual freedom to pursue the creation and expression of such lives as we will, subject to such competitive niches and markets as associate with that which defines us. Such freedom charges us with responsibility to pursue and try to shape such civilizing niches and markets as we intuit would best facilitate our moral pursuits of purposefulness and fulfillment.

Compare http://townhall.com/columnists/BillSteigerwald/2008/12/01/memories_of_a_neocon.