Saturday, September 27, 2008

Disgust with Republicans

(Click title above)

Disgust with Mainline Republicans:
.
LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY:
When we find ourselves needing to sell to foreigners our infrastructure in order for it to be built or maintained so that we can rent it back, has not our moral weakness and depravity for overextending our debt come to be written on the wall? Having sold ourselves on the cheap, can we hope ever again to regain any semblance of sovereignty?
.

In large part, I am a Red Ass Moderate because Democrats just “do not get” individual responsibility, but Republicans just “do not get” fiscal or social responsibility.

Republicans seem always to want to justify greed based on individual hunting success, apart from responsibility or loyalty owed to a wider, sustaining community.

But no individual entirely deserves or earns the pay he hunts or receives. Rather, all of us stand to gain or lose, undeservedly, from community organization, exploitation of common environment, happenstance of birth, leverage of position, adhesive and unequal bargaining, and rationalizing of why the poor should or should not mind or owe the rich. There is nothing particularly fair, reasonable, or justifiable about entire families, clans, or cliques accelerating in disproportionate power to rule the labor of others merely because of happenstance of position for leveraging.

All of us benefit from nurturing a civilization that is stable, sustainable, and amenable of surpassage.

All of us stand to benefit when society is organized to encourage or avail: individuals to work and produce; reasonable opportunity for individuals to earn enough to be able to pursue, buy, or finance shelter, clothing, food, and self respect; empathy and fair dealing with one another; respect for fundamentals for preserving family and social decency; appreciation of our shared need to nourish, heal, educate, and inspire ever-replacing generations; assimilation and respect for social traditions and laws; respect for our common culture and environment; unity for pursuing purpose, art, science, philosophy, understanding, and fulfillment; unity for defending against what is uncivil, nihilistic, or death-dealing;
and appropriate communitarian means for defending, resetting, redistributing, and reapportioning social access for each individual to have OPPORTUNITY TO PURSUE income, wealth, power, and general fulfillment.

When society lacks means for fairly reapportioning relative financial power across classes of wealth, natural advantages for leveraging positions continue to accrue, so that gulfs between “haves” and “have nots” continue to expand. Such a situation is neither healthy nor conducive to happy society.
NOR IS IT SUSTAINABLE!

All people are people; none of them appreciates being alienated, ignored, unrepresented, deceived, or condescended to, as a "little person." Yet, alienation, loss of empathy, mistrust, and mutual hostility are what occur, as gulfs in financial power accelerate ever more widely to separate us. Such gulfs seem not to be occurring so much because of innate moral merit or ability as because of compounding advantages in leveraging wealth, position, and access to cliques and secret societies of inside information and loyalties.
.
Those finding cynically competitive advantage in discarding notions of morality based in spirituality may swim up to topmost levels of power. Discarding morality, their agnostic, nihilistic, atheistic corruption leads to indifference to the plight, value, or worth of the masses of humanity. Such indifference corrupts and seeps into all levels of government and business with which such controllers come into contact. Such indifference leads us all, even ordinary governmental servants and business operatives, to become ever more indifferent and less empathetic to the welfare and moral value of one another. Thus do we begin morally to decline, quickly. (See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12yfN4wrzQ8.)

Respecting the need to incentive individual work, risk, and insight is only one aspect of a healthy society. But, too often, Republicans have been too short sighted to appreciate: how much their well being depends upon society’s sense of fairness as a whole; how dependent we all are, for being supported in old age, upon the health and good will of our progeny; and how dependent the continued economy and sustenance of all of us is upon each replacing generations’ being availed of fair, financial means to thrive.

Anyone reasonably in touch across various levels of our society should have long ago appreciated how very detrimental to good will towards Republicans is their willfully rationalized blindness, by and large, to the ill of proportionately ever-increasing gulfs across income levels.

For that blindness, the current administration has well earned society’s disgust.


Were John McCain's philosophy only the disgusting philosophy of an ordinary Republican, my support for him would be even less heartfelt.
****
See http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/29/business/29bailout.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin, discussing: Limitations on executive pay; stalls on foreclosures; sharing by Government in potential equities; rules for oversight regarding conflicts of interest; and insurance against dubious individual extensions of credit.

But, ask --- what will protect against continuing, increasing:
1) Dependence of U.S. Government on top-tier money changers?
2) Enrichment in wealth and power of abusers of top-tier money changing markets, by mooching and leveraging off the faith and credit of the national government? (There is nothing quite like paying to get screwed!)
3) Allowing of the faith and credit of the U.S. to be used to leverage the continuing sellout of America’s infrastructure to foreigners?
4) Loss of revenues for Americans for maintaining America’s infrastructure?
5) Obfuscation of transparency in accounting through ruses of inventive, dubious credit instruments?
6) Proliferation of government backed mortgage loans to un-creditworthy borrowers?
7) Debt-enslavement of Americans and people worldwide?
8) Devaluation of moral and financial worth of ordinary individual people?
9) Gulfs in income, wealth, and power between “haves” and “have nots,” to such extent as to undermine representative democracy?
10) Pixie dust paper magic to promise the sort of imaginary banquet Peter Pan offered to the Lost Boys, now promising guarantees for pension plans, later, probably, promising to assume all third world indebtedness, all of this leading not to an International Utopia, but to an International Gulag under an iron heel of top tier money controllers.
****
See http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/09/the_bailout_plan_as_of_sunday.html.
This is pixie dust paper magic for promising the same sort of imaginary banquet Peter Pan offered to the Lost Boys.
Congress now promises guarantees for pension plans. No doubt, this will be followed by promises to assume all third world indebtedness.
This is not a path to International Utopia, but to International Gulag.
We are being piped off by top level money changers, with Obama acting as smiley face for the real pipers, leading us under an iron heel of faux socialism.
Kill this bill!
****

See Ron Paul and Jim Cramer, being prescient at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Nf9Gbkbm8I.
It appears the Fed has been modulating interest rates not to modulate the economy, but to set up a Mount Vesuvius of instability, as prelude for top tier money changers to stampede us into International Gulag.
Was it H.G. Wells who once wrote a story about people expecting or thinking they were living in paradise, but in fact being raised as cattle?
****

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dave,

The country's financial situation has gotten my attention! There remains much I have difficulty comprehending. However, I think most of us are about to be royally stampeded and screwed with a very big hose.

I hardly expect you should be interested in all that follows.

But the stuff marked with "$$$" might be of interest.

Good luck with the Canadian Dollar!

****

$$$
THE ONGOING FINANCIAL STORM MAY BE TOO MUCH TO COMPREHEND, BUT IT DOES SEEM OUR PRESIDENT AND THE OTHER CLOWNS NOW RUNNING CONGRESS HAVE FORFEITED ANY EXPECTATION OF TRUST.

In the present environment of heightened concern (and sometimes hysteria), many interesting notions are now found being propagated on You Tube.
Some of the entries are obviously too over the top.
Others that, two months ago, may have seemed over the top, now seem troublingly likely.
Some are listed below.
Ron Paul, in particular, does seem to have considerable insight!

WHAT SHOULD BE DONE?

$$$
RECOMMENDATION:
Consider recommendations from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTegmIU0uOc: $$$
1) The National Treasury should print U.S. fiat notes to pay off all outstanding U.S. bonds.
2) Many former bondholders would then deposit such notes in banks, so the banks could use such new deposits to make new loans, thus precluding a freeze-up of credit.
3) To prevent such a glut of new money from causing inflation, the fractional reserve requirement should be steadily and proportionally increased, so that, eventually, the reserve required for a bank to make a loan would be 100%.
4) I believe this would separate banks and banking from investment firms and securities speculation, so that banks would depend solely on interest charges on their 100% backed loans in order to make their profits.

****

ALTERNATIVE 1 --- PERPETUAL DEBT SLAVERY:

If top controlling money changers continue effectively to bribe, intimidate, threaten, or stampede corrupted or confused lawmakers against taking such measures, what may be any other alternative, short of all of us meekly consenting, on behalf of ourselves and our children, to be harnessed for the rest of our lives to be debt slaves to a topmost controlling elite of money changers?

****

ALTERNATIVE 2 --- RATIONAL PARTICIPATION AND CONTROL:

If the first recommendation, above, is deemed not feasible, should our representatives, at a minimum, at least require:

INSURANCE: That all persons approved for borrowing pay an additional fee to insure against their insolvency.

SHARE OF POTENTIAL GAIN: That government, if it is to provide a bailout, on behalf of all taxpayers, should stand to receive not just a loss for its risk taking in trying to facilitate a transition market for otherwise junk mortgages and loans, but also, in event of eventual profit, part of any future gain.

MORE OVERSIGHT AUTHORITY: That the national government assume new and greater powers in vetoing or managing operations of the Federal Reserve.

MORE CONTROL AGAINST CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: That public employees and appointees charged to supervise such operations be intellectually, socially, and financially independent of (and unconflicted with) banks, firms and investors they will be charged to regulate.

MORE CONTROL OVER PRIVATE ENTITIES DOING BUSINESS WITH THE FEDERAL RESERVE: That part of such regulation entail the limiting of corrupting golden parachutes for banking and investing firms dealing with the Federal Reserve.


NEW TOOL: Much of the pressure for corruption has to do with too much of a gulf having widened between “haves” and “have nots.” Government needs a new financial tool, to proportionately moderate social financial pressures as a whole, to let steam out every now and then, so that ordinary workers are not continuously hosed merely because they lack access to leveraging powers of money or position.

Maybe the income tax should be ended, to substitute a progressive yearly consumption tax.

Maybe government, if it becomes a stakeholder in potential banking profits, should be required or empowered periodically to issue rebates of progressively greater amounts to lower tier borrowers or taxpayers.

****

YOU TUBE --- Shenanigans:

FEDERAL RESERVE:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTegmIU0uOc

IMPETUS FOR 1775 REVOLUTION AND SUBSEQUENT RISE OF AMERICA:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5775jNRRLiY

DECLINE OF AMERICA:
Moral values, overextended military, careless economics:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hx_iCimDEuc

BEHIND SCENES AMERO CURRENCY PREPARATIONS:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hiPrsc9g98

CONTROL OF GOVERNMENT BY BUSINESS; CHARADE TO CITIZENS:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jbi-0Tg1b_g

PONZI ATTACK BY GLOBALISTS TO SET UP MORTGAGES BASED BUST:
(Federal Reserve used to promote volatility for advantage-seeking by insiders, not to promote stability, except to prepare sheep to be shorn, by giving them false sense of security):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ybDZ7H_U4k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2fjxaRLpQo

PREVIOUS AND CURRENT PANIC SCAMS:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8lkZL1dI3k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpJJMFQgzC8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTBrJNipytg

ERASING BORDERS WITH NAFTA:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbyebk-V-Hs

ILLEGAL NWO ACTIVITIES:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rd8wwMFmCeE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3A4SgCV8jw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCFf8g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1etgsNU46s4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7q3Rvxneo4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxcoPn9ucEo

Anonymous said...

WE ARE OWNED by top tier money changers, whom we have allowed to reduce our governance to a charade:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SptB3STL5rs

MARKET IS RIGGED; inside information is undergoing ongoing abuse:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SptB3STL5rs

Americans are being abusively STAMPEDED:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2MAFMiUURI

DOLLARS ARE DOOMED as a currency --
(Diversify investments internationally; oil is going up; dollar will fall):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2MAFMiUURI

Liberal socialists and top tier money changers are in an UNHOLY ALLIANCE against free, unrigged markets, except the little leftists do not realize that the money changers have no real empathy for them, apart from putting them, LIKE LITTLE PINOCCHIO’S, INTO GULAG DEBT SLAVERY:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gZuG-52js0

Disgust:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g280MFj2_Ls
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWssgoKpsTo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XR_joc8ZqKI

Ron Paul:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bjpor8iBe58

Anonymous said...

So long as the unfettered philosophy of mainline Republicans remains that fairness consists only in "what the market decides," why, then, should they be heard to whine against the global puppet meisters who are using the very same market to dominate all of us?

Anonymous said...

See http://www.numbersusa.com/content/news/september-24-2008/rep-tancredo-demands-safeguards-any-econ.html.

Anonymous said...

SEE: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/09/burning_down_the_house.html

Anonymous said...

http://www2.hn.psu.edu/faculty/jmanis/hgwells/Modern-Utopia.pdf:

Modern Economics differs mainly from old Political Economy in having produced no Adam Smith. The old “Political Economy” made certain generalisations, and they were mostly wrong; new Economics evades generalisations, and seems to lack the intellectual power to make them. The science hangs like a gathering fog in a valley, a fog which begins nowhere and goes nowhere, an incidental, unmeaning inconvenience to passers-by. Its most typical exponents display a disposition to disavow generalizations altogether, to claim consideration as “experts,” and to make immediate political application of that conceded claim. Now Newton, Darwin, Dalton, Davy, Joule, and Adam Smith did not affect this “expert” hankey-pankey, becoming enough in a hairdresser or a fashionable physician, but indecent in a philosopher or a man of science. In this state of impotent expertness, however, or in some equally unsound state, economics must struggle on—a science that is no science, a floundering lore wallowing in a mud of statistics—until either the study of the material organisation of production on the one hand as a development of physics and geography, or the study of social aggregation on the other, renders enduring foundations possible.

See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_World_Order_(Wells); http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_world_order.

Anonymous said...

Government support (by Democrats) for cheap credit caused inflationary distortion in costs for housing and education.

Combined with government failure (by Republicans) to counteract widening gulfs in income, the consequence has been a lethal combination of punches against the middle class.

Now, with financial meltdown, the added insult to the middle class is lack of savings.

See NYT, A Fool’s Paradise, By BOB HERBERT, Published: October 6, 2008:
The burden of debt for a typical middle-income family, earning about $45,000 a year, grew by a third in just the few years from 2001 to 2004, according to the Center for American Progress. The reason for this unsustainable added weight was the rising cost of such items as housing, higher education, health care and transportation at a time when wages grew only slightly or not at all.

In other words, work was not enough.

....

Example: The after-tax income of the top 1 percent of Americans rose 228 percent from the late 1970s through 2005. The story for working families over that same stretch was one of constant struggle to just stay even. As the Pew Charitable Trusts reported last year: “The earnings of men in their 30s have remained surprisingly flat over the past four decades.”

Disaster was held at bay by the entrance of wives and mothers into the workplace, and by the embrace of colossal amounts of debt for everything from home mortgages, cars, clothing and vacations to food, college tuition and medical expenses.

****

Government needs some new financial tools, to apply counter pressure in order to reduce ever-widening gulfs in income, wealth, and power.

Such could be done easily, proportionately, so as not to impede work incentives.

After all, a man working in a factory to manufacture cars should at least hope to afford to buy one --- that is, if the automotive industry is meant to flourish!

Anonymous said...

IVY LEAGUERS:

Snippet from David Brooks, at http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/10/opinion/10brooks.html?th&emc=th:

.... politically, the G.O.P. is squeezed at both ends. The party is losing the working class by sins of omission — because it has not developed policies to address economic anxiety. It has lost the educated class by sins of commission — by telling members of that class to go away.

COMMENTS:

Republicans have, stupidly and unrelentingly, failed to address the widening gulf between middle class political independents and the affluents. And, for that stupidity, we all pay.

However, the class of “cultivated minds” is not so easily to be let off the hook. Why have its members not engaged in more introspection regarding their own guilt, and less in “I told you so” finger waggling?

Why have not more leaders among the “cultivated-mind set” gone on any sort of spiritual vision quest, to receive, learn, and inspire us with “shoulds,” rather than merely to dispense so much of the same old snotty snootiness, unenlightened by actual heavy lifting?

If the effete, coastal, cultivated minds among the “masters of the universe” cannot bring themselves to stand for any “shoulds,” can they at least get out of the way, or at least refrain from sinking us all into moral and financial oblivion?

Cannot more among them fill their empty suits and empty words by facing down some actual hardships, volunteering for military service, or by confronting purveyors of lopsided disinformation, to help wring some of it out of our lopsided, effete, excessively self-regarding media, academia, business, and culture?

Anonymous said...

MISMANAGEMENT:
W. H. Auden:
Mismanagement and grief:
We must suffer them all again
....
We must love one another or die.

See http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9803E3DF133DF932A35751C1A9679C8B63:

September 1, 1939
by W. H. Auden

I sit in one of the dives
On Fifty-second Street
Uncertain and afraid
As the clever hopes expire
Of a low dishonest decade:
Waves of anger and fear
Circulate over the bright
And darkened lands of the earth,
Obsessing our private lives;
The unmentionable odour of death
Offends the September night.
Accurate scholarship can
Unearth the whole offence
From Luther until now
That has driven a culture mad,
Find what occurred at Linz,
What huge imago made
A psychopathic god:
I and the public know
What all schoolchildren learn,
Those to whom evil is done
Do evil in return.
Exiled Thucydides knew
All that a speech can say
About Democracy,
And what dictators do,
The elderly rubbish they talk
To an apathetic grave;
Analysed all in his book,
The enlightenment driven away,
The habit-forming pain,
Mismanagement and grief:
We must suffer them all again.
Into this neutral air
Where blind skyscrapers use
Their full height to proclaim
The strength of Collective Man,
Each language pours its vain
Competitive excuse:
But who can live for long
In an euphoric dream;
Out of the mirror they stare,
Imperialism's face
And the international wrong.
Faces along the bar
Cling to their average day:
The lights must never go out,
The music must always play,
All the conventions conspire
To make this fort assume
The furniture of home;
Lest we should see where we are,
Lost in a haunted wood,
Children afraid of the night
Who have never been happy or good.
The windiest militant trash
Important Persons shout
Is not so crude as our wish:
What mad Nijinsky wrote
About Diaghilev
Is true of the normal heart;
For the error bred in the bone
Of each woman and each man
Craves what it cannot have,
Not universal love
But to be loved alone.
From the conservative dark
Into the ethical life
The dense commuters come,
Repeating their morning vow;
"I will be true to the wife,
I'll concentrate more on my work,"
And helpless governors wake
To resume their compulsory game:
Who can release them now,
Who can reach the deaf,
Who can speak for the dumb?
All I have is a voice
To undo the folded lie,
The romantic lie in the brain
Of the sensual man-in-the-street
And the lie of Authority
Whose buildings grope the sky:
There is no such thing as the State
And no one exists alone;
Hunger allows no choice
To the citizen or the police;
We must love one another or die.
Defenceless under the night
Our world in stupor lies;
Yet, dotted everywhere,
Ironic points of light
Flash out wherever the Just
Exchange their messages:
May I, composed like them
Of Eros and of dust,
Beleaguered by the same
Negation and despair,
Show an affirming flame.

Anonymous said...

PROGRESSIVE CONSUMPTION TAX:

Corporations should be prohibited from making political contributions. And contributions by individuals to specific political candidates or parties should not be tax deductible. Rather, such contributions should be considered as a form of “consumption,” and should make the contributor subject to a progressive consumption tax.

Anonymous said...

It is immoral to take from those who produce in order to "spread their wealth" and income around to work-a-phobics.

It is also immoral to fail to check against institutions calculated to advantage such disproportionate accumulations of wealth and power as to sink democracy under the rule of oligarchic aristocrats.

The way to check against both of the above modes of immorality is not with taxes on income or with giveaways to non-workers. Rather, it is consumption that should be taxed, progressively. Such tax revenues should be used to build, rebuild, and maintain the infrastructure that is used by all citizens.

Such use would create jobs. Such tax would not harm the poor. Such tax would help check against oligarchies.