(Click title above.)
NEW WORLD ORDER:
(ANTI-GLOBALISM VS. THE OWNERS OF THE COUNTRY)
Nations have become economically interdependent, yet not socially integrated. Yet, globalization is proceeding apace in respect of economic interdependence, even though we have far to go before we can make meaningful progress in peaceful international social integration.
See:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXWSdTf8Iy8; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhZk8ronces;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhZk8ronces;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brYWujMC-0k; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdxI0zClV_Y;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14Li0Wa5rc0;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uv5cqh26CC0;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dY4WlxO6i0;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14Li0Wa5rc0;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uv5cqh26CC0;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dY4WlxO6i0.
Indeed, Governments are becoming more and more bold to rationalize to voters that cozy relationships are actually desirable (?!) between international business lobbyists and governmental representatives and bureaucrats, who “regulate” their international business dealings.
Of course, international businesses are more adept to trade on currencies, to protect (even profit) themselves at the expense of everyday workers, whose incomes depreciate as their nations’ currencies are allowed (even encouraged) to be depreciated.
Regardless, much of the difficulty in integrating Western and Eastern cultures arises from their not being easily attuned to “seeing eye to eye.” That is, the West is conditioned to prize individual freedom, dignity, and scientific discovery, while the East is conditioned to honor collectivist security and barriers of tradition. Western leaders find humanity’s redemption in ever-expanding empiricism; Eastern leaders tend to remain hidebound in respect of despots’ or clerics’ literalistic interpretations of ancient texts of unchanging wisdom, often supposedly received directly from God.
Russia, although a wild card (having substantial populations of Christians, Muslims, and Communist atheists), seems to desire empirical advancement, even as its leaders seem to believe a strict form of received wisdom can and should be derived and enforced in respect of Marxism.
The resulting mix of West and East, if not calmed, is a recipe for demographic war, population explosion, and, eventually, calamity, even perhaps deliberate policies for causing mass deaths as strategies for managing excessive populations and climate change.
Perhaps, eventually, population wars will diminish as the East embraces more figurative and flexible appreciations of Islam and/or Marxism. However, rapid force-feeding to them of Western culture is not a wise way to reach for such a result.
In part, this is because the East readily sees what is obvious to most who are not Westerners, i.e., the decadent depravity of Western behavior and entertainment and the seeming inability of Western governments to draw or to enforce any lines for preserving fundamental human decency.
The West must become more humble, slow down its commercial onslaught against the East, and rediscover some soul or semblance of human decency. Then, with such an example, the West may be more welcomed, as it seeks to build bridges to the East. Meantime, the push to globalization must not come at the cost of making America or its people weak or poor, nor by surrendering to the rule of primitive religions or Sharia law.
Western “Red Ass Moderates” have two goals, of likely equal import: (1) Defend territorial borders; and (2) restore bounds of human decency. Until significant headway is made on such goals, talk of moving precipitously towards a “New World Order” is insanity-on-parade.
Unfortunately, materialists (aka secular humanists and naïve knaves) tend to complicate matters further. These people find their spiritual faith (or crusade) in trying to convince everyone else that there are no worthwhile faiths (or crusades). In insanity or evil madness, they often rationalize, in pretensions of banking and politics and science, as if we “should” be callous or indifferent-hedonists, celebratory-anarchists, and/or deceiving-nihilists.
Such materialists tend to believe the basis for fellow-empathy is derived from nothing more than random chance --- even though they lack a clear, coherent, or complete comprehension or definition for “random.” Among such folks tend to be found those most skilled in EVIL and most drawn to opportunities for manipulating human volatility, not much moderated by fellow empathy. Such people relish the volatility to come from too quickly pursuing a new world order. They are dangerously antagonistic to anyone of good common sense.
Thus, the moral challenge for Red Ass Moderates is steep, and entails considerable effort in respect of good-faith intuition, faith, resolve, and patience.
****
NWO / NAFTA: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14Li0Wa5rc0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brYWujMC-0k
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdxI0zClV_Y
FREE TRADE:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoDb3D7B2Zo
6 comments:
Snippets from http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=39C8E20F-7EC5-4341-BCE5-2B533F82E0EC:
A New World Order
By Joseph Klein
FrontPageMagazine.com
Wednesday, September 03, 2008
Like Russia, China has sold arms to the terrorist-sponsoring regimes of Iran and Syria, some of which have ended up in the hands of Hamas and Hezbollah. China has also indicated its willingness to recognize and work with these two terrorist organizations.
This is all about China’s growing need for energy, as it aggressively competes with the United States to secure the most advantageous terms and assured sources of supply in the Middle East and elsewhere. China will support some of the world’s worst offenders of human rights, including Sudan and Iran, and will side with the Israel-bashing Organization of Islamic Conference in the United Nations in order to ensure that its energy needs are met from the Muslim states that also happen to be among the world’s largest oil suppliers.
Russia has also positioned itself as a major supplier to China. For this reason, and the fact that China shares with Russia the desire to recreate a multi-polar world where the United States would lose its unchallenged dominance, China and Russia have entered into security and economic alliances and have conducted joint military exercises.
....
The political desire to counterbalance U.S. power and its short-term energy needs may push China in centrifugal fashion toward Russia and Iran, but the centripetal force of China’s interdependency with the world’s free market economies will be more likely to prevail if we engage China on the basis of mutually shared objectives. Economic globalization and energy cooperation among the world’s leading economies that rely on energy consumption for economic growth are inextricably linked.
The “New World Order Thing” becomes rather disconcerting.
Does it have consistent identity? On one hand, it seems plausibly to be warned of by JFK, advocated by Bush and Clinton, denounced by Islamists, yet used or fueled by Saudis, International Bankers, Conspiracy Mongers, and Satanists.
FDR appreciated how fear of fear is a really fear inspiring phenomenon.
For some whacked out, offbeat outtakes, see also: Satanic Voices, at http://iamthewitness.com/books/David.Pidcock/Satanic.Voices.Ancient.and.Modern.pdf
and especially INTIMIDATION, at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kv-t06dEnUs.
The real and imagined conspiracies about which folks contrive to launch jihads seem strange indeed, but even when there seems little sense being spouted, there is no mistaking the effectiveness of confident body language!
DISCONCERTING NOTE ABOUT MEDIA COORDINATED MIND MANIPULATION:
Some very disconcerting, interesting, historical, even scary things are being manipulated these days throughout our media sources, which have become monopolized like never before.
NOTICE HOW:
1) Yahoo / Huffington media and the Associated Press (see http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hpT--nX_AnIUoFkUqmEGtBQZ5sIgD93557TG2) KEEP DREDGING UP old leftist grievances, like the Rosenberg cause (just as if no leftists were ever involved in diverting atomic know how to the Soviets, sort of like the episode of Dallas, where Bobby woke up and it was all a dream).
The quite minor point they wish to convey is that Ethel may not have actually typed her husband’s spy papers. However, they strain to base that point on a reading of tea leaves, based on suppositions, based not on actual trial testimony, but on grand jury proceedings.
And why does left wing news deem such a historically minor point so important? Well, they have insinuated themselves among sponsors who have acquired means and position to stir seeds of suspicion, whether true or not, about a “vast right wing conspiracy,” have they not?
2) And this is not isolated. Rather, ask yourself: What is the agenda behind so many of the coordinated, ridiculous attacks being made against Sarah Palin?
3) Why does such a fringe kook-group as Code Pink seem to be enjoying so much free media coverage?
4) Why has the International Socialist movement come to be so closely affiliated with efforts to justify illegal immigration and open borders?
CONSIDER:
From http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/putting_lipstick_on_the_commun.html
September 12, 2008
Putting Lipstick on the Community Organizing Pig
By Kyle-Anne Shiver
No matter how much lipstick, finery and linguistic switcheroo Obama employs, his gig as a community organizer is still just a fancy-dancy way of explaining the role of a paid people's agitator.
Lipstick doesn't change a thing.
....
Since when did training panhandlers to be organized and angry rise to the level of social service?
In the immortal words of Obama's political mentor, Saul Alinsky, an organizer's job is to "rub raw the sores of discontent" and mount a socialist revolution. In the 1930s and 40s, Alinsky called his revolutionary forces "People's Organizations," but once the word "people" became so tainted by the brutalities of communist "people's republics," he changed the code word to "community," hoping to make it sound more American and neighborly.
But make no mistake. From Alinsky's initial Back of the Yards labor movement, to his Industrial Areas Foundation, where Obama first learned his own "community organizing" tactics, the goal was always revolution.
Agitate and aggravate. Those are the responsibilities of the paid "community organizer."
Prepare the people for the trials of the revolution. The people, according to Alinsky, "must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and chance the future" of change, change, change.
As Alinsky said quite clearly in his revolutionary manifesto, Reveille for Radicals:
"A People's Organization is dedicated to an eternal war...A war is not an intellectual debate, and in the war against social evils there are no rules of fair play."
In claiming some sort of altruistic motivation for his community organizing years, Barack Obama has not only applied lipstick to this pig of a dirty job, he's adorned it in enough gaudy finery to pass it off as a drag queen.
....
This community-organizing shtick that Obama says was the "best education" he ever had, was the brainchild of Saul Alinsky, who defined success as nothing more than to persistently and tenaciously "fan the latent hostilities of many of the people to the point of overt expression."
The job of the organizer is nothing more than to prepare the people to accept the necessity of the thing they most fear, according to Alinsky.
And what did Alinsky say people feared most?
Change.
And precisely how did Alinsky teach his organizers to get people to yearn for the thing they most fear?
Alinsky taught the art of psychological manipulation.
....
And what was the desired "change" in the community situation? Simply to persuade people that every one of their problems emanated, not from any personal failings or even any community-centered failings, but from a dastardly group of "Haves," the ones with all the power and all the money.
....
Governor Palin brought to public attention the very crux of community organizing. To be successful at the job, one need not produce a single, positive result. One need not perform a single objective task for the community at large. One need not produce one shred of real change or reform, nor a single act of charity. In fact, the only thing one need do to proclaim success, is to leave people more angry and demanding of a government fix-it-all than they were before the organizer arrived in the midst of their community.
Four years on Chicago's south side, getting paid to learn the sacred art of professional complaining, making the lives of others seem more miserable than they could have ever imagined and then teach them to lay every ounce of the blame at government's feet, does help to explain candidate Obama's tendency to whine, wallow and excessively complain.
In this, Obama perfectly exemplifies the definition of socialism, coined by Ludwig Von Mises in the 1930s:
Socialism is the grandiose rationalization of petty resentments.
"The grandiose rationalization of petty resentments."
Now, that's at least one thing about which there remains little doubt. Barack Obama seems to have that act down pat.
**************
NOW FOR THE SCARY PART:
The open-borders, international-socialist agenda is actually backed by those who lead both the Democrat and the Republican parties.
Goo-goo elites and street agitators are just being used as useful dupes.
The main difference among political parties concerns only to whom among those who are pulling and upsetting the strings shall the most in spoils be pillaged.
CHANGE seems definitely to be coming; but, in both personal freedom and economics, ordinary folks will lose.
Powerful competing groups do play money-power grab-games. Given the lopsided distribution of wealth and power, such games do go on, well above the heads of ordinary folks.
Insofar as such games entail the cornering of entire national currencies and markets for energy and communication (as in media monopolization), it is not too much to notice that we ARE being blown around by powerful yet competing conspiracies.
The scary part is how united they are in reducing the rest of us to continued servility.
Because there is a vast left wing oligopoly and a vast right wing oligopoly, the view for every non-lead dog pulling the sled will stay the same.
To buy into the global socialism they are both selling is only to exacerbate our servile situation.
MODERATE AMERICAN INDEPENDENTS MUST GET THE RED ASS AND PAY ATTENTION, OR AMERICA IS ABOUT TO BE SOLD DOWN THE RIVER!
***************
SOCIAL FRAUD:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1aORbWGaL8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kegJMoBJO9I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwlhTirWCGk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkZrMpv0Pss
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJ6SrZODbHg
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=5E907DF1-DC38-4776-920A-B7AED7040889
Global chutzpah in action: See http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/22/business/22global.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin.
DISTORTION AND DE-GLOBALIZATION --- “the teachers now have some problems”
Snippets from http://www.economist.com/specialreports/displayStory.cfm?source=hptextfeature&story_id=12373696:
THE WORLD ECONOMY
When fortune frowned
Oct 9th 2008
From The Economist
What will be the long-term effect of this mess on the global economy? Predicting the consequences of an unfinished crisis is perilous. But it is already clear that, even in the absence of a calamity, the direction of globalisation will change. For the past two decades the growing integration of the world economy has coincided with the intellectual ascent of the Anglo-Saxon brand of free-market capitalism, with America as its cheerleader. The freeing of trade and capital flows and the deregulation of domestic industry and finance have both spurred globalisation and come to symbolise it. Global integration, in large part, has been about the triumph of markets over governments. That process is now being reversed in three important ways.
…
Western finance will be re-regulated. At a minimum, the most freewheeling areas of modern finance, such as the $55 trillion market for credit derivatives, will be brought into the regulatory orbit. Rules on capital will be overhauled to reduce leverage and enhance the system’s resilience.
….
… governments across the emerging world extended their reach, increasing subsidies, fixing prices, banning exports of key commodities and, in India’s case, restricting futures trading.
…
America is losing economic clout and intellectual authority. Just as emerging economies are shaping the direction of global trade, so they will increasingly shape the future of finance. That is particularly true of capital-rich creditor countries such as China. Deleveraging in Western economies will be less painful if savings-rich Asian countries and oil-exporters inject more capital. Influence will increase along with economic heft. China’s vice-premier, Wang Qishan, reportedly told his American counterparts at a recent Sino-American summit that “the teachers now have some problems.”
….
… rebalancing is needed, particularly in financial regulation, where innovation outpaced a sclerotic supervisory regime ….
Misguided subsidies, on everything from biofuels to mortgage interest, have distorted markets. Loose monetary policy helped to inflate a global credit bubble.
Provocative as it may sound in today’s febrile and dangerous climate, freer and more flexible markets will still do more for the world economy than the heavy hand of government.
Moral Empathy for Machine Intelligence ---
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE:
Snippets from http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/industry/4287680.html?series=60:
"The first real AI would be something that we don't even understand," says Wright, "because we didn't program it. It will be more dissimilar in the way it thinks, than we are to a mouse."
….
There's no sense of alarm in Wright's voice when he describes this self-refining machine intelligence—no more than when he casually mentions the notion that, as technology progresses at an exponentially faster rate, towards the so-called singularity, any number of breakthroughs could, as he puts it, "cause the world to go extremely non-linear." When he provides, as classic examples, a computer AI taking over the world, or self-propagating nanobots turning everything into a grey goo, it's impossible to tell whether he's joking, or worried, or simply fascinated. But when he's asked whether that hyper-advanced AI would retain its knowledge of humanity, Wright says, "I would imagine that it can understand us. But the really scary part of this is that we don't know."
.
Comment abouot Anekāntavāda:
The concept of anekāntavāda seems not altogether dissimilar from Soros' notion (and rather unprincipled use of) of "reflexity," as well as Godel's theorem of incompleteness. Every mortal perspective has its imperfection, or Achilles heel. What helps see us through, morally, is judgment availed of insight, informed not just in book learning or in personal will to power, but through humble, empathetic appreciation and experience of a variety of perspectives. Effete elites twist to ignore as much, at their peril.
Post a Comment