The Essential Quality of Consciousness

.

Consciousness is the conservator of conceptualization. Consciousness does not function as a physically measurable force. Rather, it functions as a conceptual facilitator and conservator. Without Conscious Will --- either active or stored, present or potential, manifesting or preset --- there would be no Information that could be stored.  At its most essential, Consciousness is that meta function which facilitates meaningfulness by borrowing from nothingness. Meaningfulness is the qualitative counterpart to that which Consciousness conserves and expresses, via quantitative significations. All that is measurably signified --- original and unfolding --- consists with bubbles manifesting forth out of nothingness, facilitated by Consciousness.

.

Conceptualization avails freedom to Consciousness; conservation avails parameter-limiting feedback to Consciousness. Without conservation (limits and laws), there would be no freedom. There is no freedom except under law. Feedback avails the signification of appreciable choices. The feedback by which Consciousness functions consists via a mathematical (digital-based) dance of apprehension (fore-boding) and appreciation (after-boding). The mathematical average of the dance as a whole always conserves and balances out to zero (quantitative nothingness). Conceptualization of math, borrowed from zero, yields conceptualization of fluxing forms, which yields conceptualization of space-time. Reconciliation back to zero yields conceptualization of matter-energy. The dance of conceptual conservation proceeds in digital like feedback between parts (particular fluxing perspectives of consciousness) and the whole (holistically synchronizing perspective of consciousness).

.

That which is conceptualized as good is that which is adjudged helpful towards that which is sought to be reconciled. That which is conceptualized as neutral is that which is adjudged of vanishing relevance towards that which is sought. That which is conceptualized as bad is that which is adjudged counterproductive to that which is sought. Except in respect of a digital dance of feedback between perspectives of Consciousness, concepts of good, neutral, and bad would have little or no significance in themselves.

*******

The method of scientific empiricism is the only way to learn the quantitative formulas that delimit the parameters of the human biosphere. That system of conservation is the system within which conscious will conceptualizes.  However, the method of scientific empiricism is not suited to apprehend that to which conscious will should guide its conceptualizations insofar as there remain degrees of freedom to so guide.  There is a feedback relationship between that which is conserved and that which is conceptualized.  Conceptualization affects the apparent reality of the quantitatively testable.  Of course, the capacity of a single perspective of consciousness to so affect the conservational system is much more diluted than the sum of the capacity of all perspectives, or of the presently synchronizing or pre-willed and pre-set capacity of the holistic perspective.  Even so, the qualitative aspect of participating conscious will is a prime reality, which is clear to experience and enlightened intuition, even though, by definition, it is not itself subject to quantitative proof.
.

Free Thinking Soon To Be Outlawed

Incompetents cannot be forced to be free. Moreover, persons who are not independently competent are needed for drudge work. Competent, producing, creative, middle-class republicans need to allow those who want to perform and to supervise drudge work to do so, while somehow retaining time, resources, and opportunity to be free to create. In Huxley’s Brave New World, there was a balance among classes, so that members of each class were kept satisfied with their situations. Somewhat similarly, the American Constitution sought to establish and preserve a republic by providing for checks and balances among various institutions of law and governance. However, the founders did not adequately foresee or provide for the day when the elites who run international corporations would acquire so much lopsided control over all institutions of mass finance, indoctrination into depravity (media and academia), and governance (international crony buying and selling of political influence). This lopsided and depraved state of affairs is now such that the producing and creating middle class is being milked, bilked, abused, and despised from all sides --- even as the borders of the country are being erased by deliberate neglect, under false cover of free trade with Marxists and Muslims. An independent, republican nation cannot be sustained when its middle class backbone is broken and its borders are despised.
.
Did not a similar state of depravity ruin the Roman republic and replace it with a despotic empire, ever more inclined to slavery and repression, ever less standing for anything that could adequately inspire defense against the disintegrating vices invited? Thereafter, by ever more repression and slavery, the Roman empire survived a long time. When it fell, a long period of even greater darkness descended. During that time, a malignant form of religious tyranny spread forth from the Middle East. The Renaissance did not begin to revitalize human dignity until tyranny from the East pushed genius to seek refuge in the West, and pushed the West to rise and stand. Thereafter, only when pushed to extremis did the West finally rise again, to stand for spreading human dignity and freedom, i.e., a flowering of free thinkers. Now, that flowering is being retracted, as oligarchs fund faux elites and experts, to trick and wrest to themselves all significant influence and control. The middle class is again being reduced to serf irrelevance and depravity, to mouth only elite catechisms (if they know what’s good for their careers). This will not sustain an expanding economy, nor expanding creativity, nor human decency or liberty. This is prelude to retrenchment to the subhuman.
.
The only way to avoid retrenchment is to revitalize political representation of a middle class of free thinkers. The only way to do that is to right the balance of power, by creating institutions that can check against the international corporate cronyism that is based out of Marxist and Muslim nations. That is the danger the founders failed adequately to check against, and that is the most virulent danger to human decency and liberty today. Yet, no important political party addresses such danger. Why? That’s easy. Both parties are, in main, directly or indirectly, funded by corrupt international crony corporatists. Except in bread and circuses, the middle class remains unorganized, unfunded, and unrepresented.
.
The lower class tends not to know what to do with itself, absent a taskmaster, while the upper class desires to be served. Neither is fond of any independent middle class, which tends to shame both the lower and the upper class. The upper class of inherited wealth is particularly shamed because its members know, in themselves, that there is not a great deal in them that is worth admiring. They don't tend to be creators or producers of great arts or inventions. Rather, they tend only to be buyers and sellers. The lower class is shamed because it's constantly reminded of its deficiencies and perpetual dependence. The lower and upper classes share an interest to hold the middle class in political servitude. The lower class cannot otherwise provide for itself, and the upper class cannot otherwise defend and enforce its leisure and rule. Dinos and Rinos align as Ainos, while middle class conservors of human dignity and freedom remain politically unorganized, unfunded, and unrepresented.
.
Means are being institutionalized to enforce such position in perpetuity. The trend is to a NWO, which will be like a rigid, hierarchical ant pile. The face of humanity will be replaced by a large headed ant. Unless an independent-minded middle class can somehow organize, leverage funding, and sustain viable political representation, the American Republic will be sold out to an empire of hierarchical serfdom, i.e., an Orwellian boot on the face of humanity — forever. Tattooed with a cynically smiling face.
.
Obama-the-Dino must be sent packing. Romney, however, must be closely watched. There is no “mission accomplished” for Conservatives merely by electing a Republican. Indeed, the need to establish a Conservative Political Party will become even more vital. Otherwise, a NWO will be set in concrete upon humanity with nary a whimper. If Obama woke us up, the danger is that Romney will put us back to sleep. The difference between a stagnant antpile and a human race worthy of interest of God and for exploring the cosmos is in the establishment and preservation of a class of free thinkers.
.

Borrowing From Zero --- Causation, Correlation and Signification

.
ARBITRARINESS OF CAUSE AND EFFECT:  Does that which is effect and that which is cause depend on perspective, context, and purpose?  Insofar as unconscious "forces," do any such "things" really abide in themselves, apart from consciousness?  How can we empirically know whether chronology is always conserved by natural law versus renormalized by meta (non-empirical)-consciousness?  Does effect always follow cause, or can cause follow effect?  Does some character of the cosmos synchronize to make each decision even before each particularly conscious body apprehends that it has made a decision?  What is the character of the flux in feedback between apprehensions (fore-bodings) and appreciations (after-bodings)?  When are after-bodings fore-bodings, and when are fore-bodings after-bodings?  When can that which causes a rationaliztion be reasonably considered as having alreay rationalized the rationalization?  How is feedback between the Holism and its Parts synchronized?  Does the perspective of the Whole borrow against the Sum of its parts, and vice versa, does the Sum of the perspectives borrow against the Whole?  When, how, and why may a cause refocus itself as an effect?
.

BORROWING FROM ZERO:  Consciousness is that which can signify by borrowing from zero.  Regardless of what we measure or how carefully we measure, every "thing" that we can measure owes a conservational debt to zero. That is, our physical universe bubbled out from nothingness, and it will collapse back into nothingness. The "things" we measure and quantify are sequential mirages, such that every attempt to complete a measure necessarily recedes. If there abides any eternal or lasting entity or purpose, it abides in respect of meta properties and feedback that we, in our communicative significations, cannot quantify, but only indirectly experience, intuit, and empathize about. The only truth for us is that we can experience choosing, and we can tinker with how to pursue that which we choose, but we will never fully grasp any "real thing." However, as we make and change our choices, we can apprehend tactics for pursuing them, and such tactics will yield varying aspects of success (or truth value, or "truthiness"). The only "thing" that remains (everywhere and for all time and sequence) constant in its signification is change. The only non-trivial truth is that our experiences of conscious identity are derivative of an immeasurably entailed Source, with which we may or may not enjoy (or believe to enjoy) a meta-intuitive and empathetic relationship. In respect of that, we can choose to pursue a decent civilization of human liberty, or we can lose ourselves in pursuing no encompassing purpose apart from drug and hormone induced highs, derivative of hallucinations of "things" (and wars to mine or steal them).

.

SPIRITUAL EMPATHY: Spiritual empathy abides with caring, deceit, and wonder, and it is signified to be expressed in quantifiables. Spiritual empathy is the source of quantifiable communications (significations), not the byproduct. One exists more authentically by conceptualizing how expressions of empathy may be signified among potentially unlimited quantifiables, than by seeking somehow to confine or banish spirituality as a mere delusion. Science should better enhance the expressive signification of spiritual empathy, than try to prove or zero out spiritual empathy, either as entity or non-entity. In expressing oneself, one either conceptualizes that spiritual empathy abides, or one does not. The only “evidence” of spiritual empathy is non-empirical, non-scientifically testable. The evidence is in the living and experiencing. Quantifiables have nothing to do with proving such a pure qualitative. That said, those who resolve to live as if spiritual empathy were a non-entity are not reasonably expected to stand for much beyond the narrow perimeter of their self interests. Indeed, they will tend to believe there is not really any such a property as unselfishness (projective identification beyond delusions of matter).
.
SPIRITUAL FEEDBACK: The way the holism produces and guides seemingly particular perspectives has to do with how immaterial feedback is conducted between the signifying holistic perspective and the sensing particularistic perspectives. Every aspect that is signified is, at some level, sensed, and every aspect that is sensed is, at some level, signified. However, a particular perspective does not have capacity simultaneously to sense and signify the same interpreted aspect. Rather, there is a break in the simultaneity that avails feedback, hence chronological communication. That which unfolds is in respect of interfunctioning between sensing and signifying. It is not “caused” merely by what we sense to be unconscious signification of “mass.”
.
CAUSATION: Scientists and Spiritualists alike seek to understand causation. CAUSATION can be considered under many perspectives, contexts, and purposes. It can be considered under many headings, such as the following, which are not mutually exclusive, nor do I claim to know whether they are exhaustive:

1) Forces (weak, strong, radiating, gravitational);

2) Determinants (directed, random, chosen, evolving, guided, natural, artificial);

3) Transformants (sharing, exchanging, adding, losing, mutating, blueprinting);

4) Fields (multi-dimensional, 3-D waves, 2-D strings, 1-D points, wave-particle fluxes and collapses);

5) Particles (zero-conserving, virtual-borrowing, space-occupying, mass-carrying, charged neutral and polarized, paired and single, reactive or transformative, information carrying, size measuring, dark, bosons, ultimate, God particles);

6) Space-time occupancy (thinginess, massiness, hardness, exclusiveness, additiveness, space-distortion capacity, time-sequence-borrowing capacity);

7) Inertia (directional momentum, acceleration);

8) Densities (weight, massiness, reactiveness, inertness, temperature, vibration);

9) Detectibility (integrity, size, speed, direction, duration, alternating convertibility, testability, observability);

10) Direction (singular, repulsion, attraction, pushing, pulling, gluing, charged, polarized, angular, spin, orbit, intensity, amplitude, frequency, alternating);

11) Measurable Completeness (coherence, consistency, continuosity, digital discreteness, paradoxical, ambiguous, overlapping across logical categories, defying set restricted logical classification, trivalent defying of bivalent rule of the excluded middle);

12) Relations (essential and paradoxical thing in itself, ultimate particle, bonded, paired, annihilated, asymmetrical, directional, simultaneous, sequential, virtual, borrowed, catalytic, back feeding, transformational, fluxing, translatable, representative, signalizing, communicative, conservational yet unlimited, creative yet magical);
13) Explanatory Value (morally qualitative, empirically quantitative, sequential, predicting, controlling, replicating, statistically reliable, causal, associative, epiphenomenal, byproduct, delusional, conceptual, self authenticating, magical);

14) Information representing and storing capacity (picture defining and transmitting capacity, quantitative measurability, empirical confirmability, modeling and mapping capacity, logical consistency);

15) Re-Normativeness of Sequentiality (adjustability to relative standard based on point of view, context, and focus of purpose, resistence to creative re-conceptualization, preclusion of preservation of quantitative-based knowledge of travel back and forth in time, chronological protection mechanism, inter-changing virtuality of cause and effect);

16) Potentiality (mathematical, digital, sequential, conservational, quantitatively balanced to zero yet infinite, finite yet unbounded, unitary yet changing, fluxing yet vibrational, identical yet particular, qualitatively purposeful yet eternally unsatisfied, honest yet deceiving, ephemeral yet normatively measurable, timeless yet chronological, logical yet metaphysical — we know not what it is, but we know that it is not limited in its potential to that which it presently presents);
17) Intuitability (knowledge, belief, doubt, empirical confirmability, intuitive self fulfillment, truth value for reconciling non-quantitative qualitatives in respect of pursuits of conscious fulfillment);

18) Purposefulness (moral, good, evil, neutral, competitive, cooperative, empathetic, caring, connived);

19) Identity (iteration, polarity, projectibility, quality, holonic relativity);

20) Significativeness (amenability to modeling for measuring, however incomplete);

21) Holonic (synchronization between and among perspectives of the whole and of the parts).
.

SIGNIFICATION --- CONCEPTUAL COMMUNICATION AND BUILDING ON BACKS OF FAIRIES: Naming of aspects of particles sometimes seems similar to priests naming of aspects of God. As if naming or conceptualizing can somehow box God in, or magically constitute some real attribute or name-in-itself for whatever may constitute the Ephemeral Essence. We name particles as if we could hope to categorize and control the entire zoo of potential experience. As if our naming, conceptualizing, conjuring, measuring, and tinkering could participate in the unfolding creation and expression of some kind of meta-essential reality-in-itself. Might it thus be? Certainly, naming is useful. It helps us conceive and tinker. But it does not define, confine, or exclusively exhaust the entire quantifiability of all that is potentially signifiable. Nor will we ever succeed in categorizing and collecting a complete and entire set of mutually exclusive and exhaustive particles or concepts by which we could imagine of make up quantifiable reality. We cannot reasonably hope for that kind of scientific advancement. Yet, we can enhance significations that help us tinker and produce astonishing technological marvels. That is an aspect of the freedom that is expressed, through the feedback effect of our perspectives of Will dancing with God’s freedom of will. All that we experience and propose is derivative of the cloud or essential essence of God's unfolding facilitation of a dance of Will. All of conscious Identity is dependent on a same synchronizing cloud, an Ephemeral Essence, in respect of which are derived all measurable and quantitative aspects (significations) of causes, troubles, pains, pursuits, deceits, empathies, insights, and intuitions.
.
IMMATERIALITY: We do not sense any thing as it really is, in itself, for there is no way for a mortal to directly, empirically, or measurably sense a thing-in-itself. Instead, we apprehend and experience sensations of relations: the observed relation; the unconscious context of observation; the conscious participation in the observation. The quality of our participations and apprehensions feed back, to relate to the quality of synchronizing apprehensions of the Holism. Thus, there is constant, continuous, digital feedback and signification among relations in consciousness --- from and between the perspective of the part and the perspective of the holism.
.
SOURCE: The Source of such feedback is the source of consciousness, perhaps even of consciousness itself. What if our bodies and apprehensions are tricked out significations of their fluxes? Of which, beyond our bodies, we also are a part? What if “they” (previous evolutions of conscious beings from other planets) have already evolved to superior state, to garden their empathies and creative interests through us, as vicarious significations? What if our roles and duties are to function, in part, as avatars, to experience and feel, so that they also can, through us, signify? Once Beings of Consciousness harness the exponentially explosive potentiality of imaginative consciousness, they may have little reason to preserve museums or archeological records, or worlds of their evolution, from relatively fast ravages of inter-stellar expressions of force and fluxing causation. Once they “transcend,” why be surprised of the blasting away of any archeological record? After all, a record is not a thing-in-itself.
.
THE NON-REDUCTIVENESS OF THINGS: Somehow, depending on one’s perspective, context, and purpose, an Ephemeral Essence presents to apprehensions — as having properties, faces, and masks for appearing to be: Expanding or collapsing, rolling out or in, stretching or compressing, blinking ir or out, projecting or drawing, pushing or pulling, attracting or repulsing, changing or catalyzing, transforming or conserving, escaping or synchronizing, creating or annihilating, iterating or absorbing, spinning or orbiting, breaking or fluxing, dividing or reconciling, counting or scaling, vibrating or vanishing, mapping or modeling, apprehending or appreciating, valuing or pricing, explaining or unifying.
.
Only in respect of such presentations of properties is one is availed significations that can be scaled and measured, until such scalings result in transformations or phase shifts, which then can only be reasonably related along different, not necessarily coordinate, scales. The more precisely detailed one pursues to make one’s measure, the more the limits of one’s standard recede into fuzzy uncertainty, the more craftily the Ephemeral Essence facilitates alternative standards for measuring presentations. And so on. Thus, our sensations for experiencing and measuring manipulations of presentations is discretely finite, continuously unbounded, and not unitarily reductionist.
.
Under all such faces and masks, that which itself is fluxing and presenting significations to our apprehensions remains of the same essence, but is identifiable in its fluxing sameness only in qualitative respect, not quantitative. The operations by which we measure to stretch, compress, divide, glue, change, charge, polarize, spin, vibrate, transform, represent, etc., are performed in respect of how significations present to our conscious apprehension. That is, we differentially measure significations and signs of an Ephemeral Essence, which in itself we cannot measure, but only experience, armed only with our consciousness of identity, sensation, intuition, and empathy. We apprehend the Essence’s significations, we know our consciousness, we intuit ongoing participation, and, in respect thereof, we derive our moral purposefulness as we pursue our meaningful fulfillment.
.
CORRELATION --- Crossing the Fog:
Of the foggy apprehension of possibilities and the conscious appreciation of manifestations:  All other factors remaining proportionately equal, consider single-dimensional analysis of such “all other factors.” Ask: In what respect may such a mental project ever reasonably, precisely, or practically be undertaken? Suppose a person were — in any single way or along any single dimension — to alter his relationship with his contextual frame of reference (or space-time orientation), as by: altering his (or his avatar's, or his proxy's, or his thing-being-tested's) relative proximity, direction, speed, acceleration, angular momentum, orbital radius, vibration, focus of attention, screening of noise, or language or logarithm of deciphering. With each alteration of his point of view, would not his entire frame of reference also be affected? Still, he may find it practical, for many tinkering pursuits, to assume that all factors apart from his own orientation remain proportionately constant or continuous. However, such would not be the case. His change in point of view would affect his entire frame of reference, however subtly. The greater the individual change, the greater the multi-dimensional flux in his frame of reference. Eventually, the noise and fuzz of the multi-dimensional flux will overpower his capacity to maintain a sequentially proportional or logarithmic correlation between his perspective and his context. He will find himself in a paradoxical or foggy land of infinite possibilities of quantum fuzz or cognitive dissonance.

He may relieve such fog and fuzz either by reducing or increasing the direction or rate of his alteration from the original state with which the sustenance of his identity has bonded. However, he will not be able to disperse or clear the fog that separates the multi-dimensional transition. Nor will he be able to ensure the eternal life or body of his physical avatar. Death (identity transcendence) is his ultimate fog of transition. No single-dimensional-based technology will enable him to preserve a clearly proportional or logarithmic correlation across all alterations in his path between all perspectives and contexts. He will not be able to explicate, predict, or control the physical expression of the world in respect of any grand, reconciling, precisely-measuring model, map, or theory. Not in any single dimension of space, space-time, gravity, mass, direction, angular momentum, evolution from chaos, recordation of memory, entanglement of information, presetting of dominoes, competition among free beings, nor bonding to avatar. Rather, the transitioning and unfolding of that which presents from the communication and functioning that is signified across multiple dimensions is byproduct of a meta dance of feedback (of unfolding apprehension and appreciation) ... between an holistic source of conscious will and its variously particular perspectives.  Moreover, every perspective of consciousness participates in the feedback dance of apprehension and appreciation, in respect of which is signified all that is made manifest.
Respect for that is the basis for meaning, purposeful tinkering, empathy, and civilized morality. God presently feeds back, in respect of such significations as God presently has apprehensions of and appreciations for.

Good and Evil Will -- preset versus active

.

PRESET WILL:  It seems doubtless that an Ephemeral Essence places many significations on preset autopilot, perhaps via logarithmic controls of either hard or random determination. Those math-based determinants ("laws of nature") that we share in common derivation from the Singular Holism may be conceptualized as exemplars of preset Will. They are what avail the illusion of substance, the massiness of matter, the solidity of things, the measurability of transfers of energy, the quantitative conservation of substantive transformations, the putting of flesh on signs. However, even such presets are subject to phase shifts, should the Holism adjudge a need, and such phase shifts themselves may be subject to presets.

.

CONSERVATIONAL FEEDBACK:  Even so, may the Ephemeral Essence remain involved and interested in some respects, to be influenced by present feedback, to alter its interests and guidance accordingly, as in a conservational dance with perspectives of interest? In respect of any such qualitative influence or feedback from the Holism with unfolding particular Perspectives, there would be no way, quantitatively, to measurably confirm, replicate, or predict such interest. Apart from intuitive sense of something like holistic empathy, astonishing coincidence, or uncanny deja vu, there would be no empirical way to prove the bodily involvement of a non-bodily entity.

.

GOD INTERESTS:  Such a perspective of Will, as an interesting human being may experience, may entail God dancing with one, in present time, or God having preset the dance, beyond present time. Of our less interesting conduct, God may "take note" only by storing Information with a recording algorithm. Of our more interesting conduct, God may presently actuate feedback that is astonishing, yet not physically verifiable as having entailed God's active interest. In any event, all that is consciously sensed is derivative of interfunctioning of perspectives of Will --- sometimes preset, sometimes presently actuated.

.

PURE WILL:  We do not enjoy pure freedom to act irrespective of preset or presently set significations of God. Nor is it quite "our" Will that is free. Our mortal forms only avail avatars and perspectives for giving expression to the sensing, apprehending, appreciating, and evaluating of feedback of Will in respect of unfolding significations. While every perspective plays a necessary role in the conservational expression of the music of the cosmos, many are often "behind the camera" of God's active interest, yet all are eventually absorbed into the holistic prespective. Thus, there is meaning, merit, and purpose in the unfolding of the dance of Will --- both from holistic and from particular perspective, both in presets and in active dancing.  The intuitive indicator of an active dancer is expressed in the quality of being receptive to the dance, not in the empirical measure of any quantitative, nor in the precise monitoring of any physical form or robotic meant to establish artificial intelligence. 

.
EVIL:  Why is evil allowed? Evil is allowed because of a necessary rift between cooperation and competition, between the fluxing whole and its conservationally dependent parts. Paths to evil become easier as the dance between individual and holistic perspectives breaks down, so that mutual caring among perspectives is delayed, as by talking to the hand, as when the Holism becomes more interested in synchronizing multilayered group aspects for availing significations than individual aspects for apprehending conscious feedback. Part of God's job description is to participate in the unfolding design of each shared light-cone of experience. Part of God's purpose is to avail individual perspectives with opportunities to learn and record how to react to changing, group-availed significations. Evolution proceeds along multilayered tracts when individuals with new and multilayered superiorities or traits for competition and/or cooperation are favored for reproducing. For individual based societies (republics), individual superiorities will be favored. For collectivist based societies (hives), group superiorities will be favored. Even so, for defining the fittest to survive and replicate, the following are ever entailed: Will (holistic, preset, active, perspectivistic), synchronization, consciousness, appreciation, and purposefulness --- via a dance of feedback between a perspective of the fluxing whole and perspectives among the variously signified and relating parts.
.

Of Quantitatively Causal and Qualitatively Moral Significations

.

Of Quantitatively Causal and Qualitatively Moral Significations:

.

People want to understand how they signify in their consciousness, bodies, manipulations of things and masses, and communications with other perspectives.  People want to learn what their dispositions are, how their dispositions are related, how their dispositions should be expressed, evaluated, adjusted, sacrificed, altered, highlighted, organized, preserved, celebrated. People want to understand whether and why their dispositions must or should change. People want to understand what is in it for them, when they or things change. People want to understand whether and how their consciousness of Identity or identities are in any way preserved, even after their bodies disintegrate. People want to understand whether such concerns can be proved, determined, and/or rationalized --- wilfully, logically, reasonably, empirically, objectively, quantitatively, subjectively, qualitatively, probably, randomly, intuitively, empathetically, receptively. People want to understand whether all chronological appearances ot things, relations, and events are predetermined, actively and wilfully determined, or subjected to random determination, by a Higher Synchronizing Agency, and whether, if such might be the case, we can --- in any meaningful, reliable, or rational way --- intuit, communicate, or feed back interests, emotives, and rationalized desires with such Agency.

.

In respect of such needs and questions, people find it interesting to consider how and in what contexts empirical based methods may avail or guide answers, how such answers may be adequate, inadequate, evolving, complete, incomplete, astonishing, and/or changing. People find it interesting to consider whether or when reasonable traditions or answers must or may best be sought or inculcated beyond empirical based methods, in methods of prayer, intuition, and meta-empathy.

.

People want to understand the Source of significations, appearances, associations, and "causes." People want to understand such rules (and the Source of such rules) for such significations as they may happen objectively to share within their shared light cone of measurable experience. People want to understand whether, why, when, and how: Some iterations of signified relations cannot occupy the same space-time locus; some iterations of relations can, by intensifying, occupy the same space-time locus; some iterations annihilate one another back to zero signification; some attract or repulse, weakly or strongly, randomly or definitely; some coordinate pulses synchronously, instantaneously, and at a distance; some appear to push, to pull, or to push or pull or borrow against zero space or future time.

.

A RATIONALIZATION OF OUR RELATION WITH A SYNCHRONIZER:

.

A Holism conserves, synchronizes, quantifies, and senses every particular pattern and relation it avails. Each seemingly separate pattern that constitutes a qualitative-quantitative in its relation to our conscious experiences and measurable relations is absorbed, subsumed, and translated to a synchronous symphony for the Holism, out of otherwise cacophonous chaos.

.

In the Holism’s digitally summing capacity, it iterates us. In its holistic capacity, it reconciles us. In its capacity as conductor-composer, it feeds back from us. All that we experience, qualitatively and quantitatively, depends on the Holism’s apprehensions, appreciations, and interests concerning the iterating, summing, and reconciling of translations of us.

.

With intuition, empathy, and qualitative insight that come of subjective, conscious experience, we may become receptive to glimpses to guide us regarding the quality of the Holisms’s interest in us. That guiding feedback can be conceptualized as a dance of Will. Such can be interpreted as the functioning Will of a multi-layered, reconciling, guiding Evolver. Out of otherwise chaos, such Evolver apprehends, appreciates, and conducts a symphony of the cosmos.

.

Insofar as retired Americans have time to devote, and so long as the Internet remains viable, there remains viable the hope that our Republic may a bit longer be salvaged for our progeny.

.

Eternal Present

.
ETERNAL PRESENT: From our particular perspectives, the present for quantifiables appears to proceed from an original singularity towards a vast multitude of individual, swallowing black holes. However, from holistic perspective, may the present also appear to proceed, conservationally, back and forth, across and through, a single source black hole, a kind of empty yet full, zero yet infinite, nothingness, which, however, presents to our particular perspectives as if some meta character or property associated with it were actively sponsoring an outbound multitude of small black holes? May the smaller black holes abide simply as derivatives (illusory projections) of the one source black hole?
.
From holistic perspective, may the original singularity be exploding, digitally, back and forth, in continuous consecutivitity? So long as our consciousness is interpreted from our perspectives as accelerating “outbound,” and so long as the source singularity is quantitatively constant and continuously consecutive, how could we say, from our digitally-limited light-cones of experience, whether or not it continues, or whether or not each swallowing by each small black hole is recycled through the source-singular black hole? May each collapse into each small black hole entail or signify a simultaneously polarized explosion from the source-singularity? Are the small black holes and the source singularity really different things, or are they just different projections or iterations of the same sponsoring entity or Identity? Are the small black holes projections of a cave, from within the cave?
.
What lies “beyond” the cave? Is IT some Ephemeral Essence that applies holistic consciousness, in order to signify measurable appearances, in order to experience and communicate particular perspectives of: music versus noise, art versus chaos, and purposefulness versus anomie? May each individual perspective of consciousness be intimately connected with (spiritually empathetic to?) such holism, therewith to all others? May each seemingly particular perspective be an iteration of a single reconciling Identity of Spiritual Consciousness?
.
May the reconciling holism abide, superior to mortal logic, both within and outside mortal appearances of space-time, constituting a holism that is simultaneously the encompassment or sum of its particular parts and perspectives, but also a qualitative character that abides in addition to such sum, or more than such sum?
.
What, in “reason,” should we believe or doubt regarding the quality of such holism’s relationship with us? Can it thoroughly experience each and every particular perspective, without experiencing being entirely confined to each such perspective? How can this make sense to our particularly limited logic, reason, intuition, or moral devotion? I can meta-rationalize, but I don’t know, even though I have little choice but to intuit, believe, and orient to some kind of worldview. As a mortal largely confined to either-or logic, I intuit that one either believes or one does not (which is its own form of belief). When I refer to beliefs, I mean to include subconscious habits of behavior, of which one may not have abstracted to the level of consciously signified belief. Thus, I intuit one may act consistent with subconscious belief in a morally-reconciling holism or principle, even as one denies such prejudice or belief.
.
We each adjudge as best we can what are the moral loyalties and commitments of others. Few trust loyalties of those adjudged to be free of all loyalties beyond their shrunken selves. This is because there dwell Progs, Clown Libertines, Egghead Reductionists, Narcissists, and Sociopaths (i.e., know-it-all, quantify-it-all Rinos, Dinos, NWO).
.

REVERSING POINTS OF VIEW

.

REVERSING POINTS OF VIEW:

.

CAUSE AND EFFECT: Apart from pre-set associations and sequential significations, what “really” mediates cause and effect, to facilitate the choosing or determining of relational unfoldings of appearances and events? Are not Identities often quantitatively the same in existential essence, yet qualitatively differentiating in temporal translations and relations? How should things or events be identified or seen to flux or change, except as the Holism synchronizes to will and want? Is such not a marker of consciousness? What is being attracted, repelled, or spun, but the delusionary conceptualizations, appreciations, apprehensions, and pursuits of iterations of perspectives of a single identity of Consciousness — vying for signification and expression in respect of an holistic, receding, proceeding, flux of connected, conscious Will?

.

ASK: Insofar as mortals, by definition, cannot relate in order to measure against a quantitatively un-relatable standard (like a thing-in-itself), then ask:

.
ITERATIONS OF IDENTITY: Depending on how one defines our commonly quantifiable universe, is it preset to collapse (return to zero?) into a multitude of black holes? If so, is each black hole, in translatable respect, simply an iteration of every other black hole? Does each black hole signify an identity that is distinguishable only in apparent relations, but not in absolute respect? Is each collapse an iterative signification for a collapse of the whole?

.

ATTITUDE OF CONCEPTION: Can we as easily conceptualize our universe as if it is accelerating to a collapse or as if it is accelerating to an expansion? Is space-time expanding or contracting? Is there any absolute sense in which our universe can be said to be expanding or contracting? Or in which gravity can be said to be a repelling versus an attracting force? When space-time is conceptualized to be exploding from a singular point, must it not also be conceptualized as distorting? Must not not such distortion twist matter, energy, and mass out of so-called “empty” space-time? Are relative experiences or recordations of matter-energy (quantitative substance, or mass) derivative of distortions of space-time? Or are relative experiences of space-time derivative of distortions of matter-energy? If space-time distortions are conceptualized as causing mass, then gravity is signified as an attractive force. If mass is conceptualized as causing space-time distortions, then gravity is signified as a repellant force. Regardless of conceptualization, gravity will be experienced consistent with formulas of general relativity. Does local variance in mass "cause" distortions in the space-time field, or do distortions in the space-time field cause mass? Is mass a causal agent, or is it only a signifier that is communicated or associated with a synchronizing causal agent, which is of a meta-quality that is beyond measure or control, but not beyond appreciation and prayer?

.

MEASURING BY CONSERVING ZERO: Conservation preserves quantitative tradeoffs in calculations for relative experiences of matter and energy. But can matter and energy be considered as a substantive unity, as matter-energy? If so, can such matter-energy holistically flux in ways that cannot be locally quantified, as by expanding, stretching, twisting, distorting and fluxing space, time, or space-time? May immeasurably qualitative fluxes of a holism, like an Ephemeral Essence, account for relatively quantifiable distortions and interfunctionings of space-time and matter-energy?

.

POINT OF VIEW: Which way on a mobius twist, or a staircase of circling and connecting patterns and strings, is up, and which way is down? There is a popular picture which can be conceptualized, depending on perspective and habit, as depicting either an old woman with an ugly nose or a rabbit. Except insofar as one may be disposed to consider such depiction as the “picture” of a rabbit-witch, it is not really, in itself, a picture of either. Likewise, it may be considered that gravity is not really either a pushing or a pulling force. This suggests why a grand theory of physics cannot be unified: Because, in reality, every concept of quantitative physics is necessarily derivative of a concept of qualitative consciousness.
.

UNIFICATION OF STAGE: The Standard Model, as a way of expecting, in order to completely reduce the qualitative to the quantitative, cannot succeed. To succeed, it would have to incorporate gravity as either a purely attractive force for mass, or a purely repellant force. That cannot be done, for gravity and mass are not things in themselves. They are byproduct-significations of a synchronizing, Ephemeral Essence, which fluxes in digital-like back-and-forth, give and take, attraction and repulsion ... for changing and exploring communications of order pulled from chaos, music pulled from noise, beauty pulled from disgust, awe pulled from anomie, the qualitative pulled from the quantitative, and freedom pulled from empathy. For that, the physical world is a constructed stage, not a thing that can be measured in itself.

.