Incompetents cannot be forced to be free. Moreover, persons who are not independently competent are needed for drudge work. Competent, producing, creative, middle-class republicans need to allow those who want to perform and to supervise drudge work to do so, while somehow retaining time, resources, and opportunity to be free to create. In Huxley’s Brave New World, there was a balance among classes, so that members of each class were kept satisfied with their situations. Somewhat similarly, the American Constitution sought to establish and preserve a republic by providing for checks and balances among various institutions of law and governance. However, the founders did not adequately foresee or provide for the day when the elites who run international corporations would acquire so much lopsided control over all institutions of mass finance, indoctrination into depravity (media and academia), and governance (international crony buying and selling of political influence). This lopsided and depraved state of affairs is now such that the producing and creating middle class is being milked, bilked, abused, and despised from all sides --- even as the borders of the country are being erased by deliberate neglect, under false cover of free trade with Marxists and Muslims. An independent, republican nation cannot be sustained when its middle class backbone is broken and its borders are despised.
.
Did not a similar state of depravity ruin the Roman republic and replace it with a despotic empire, ever more inclined to slavery and repression, ever less standing for anything that could adequately inspire defense against the disintegrating vices invited? Thereafter, by ever more repression and slavery, the Roman empire survived a long time. When it fell, a long period of even greater darkness descended. During that time, a malignant form of religious tyranny spread forth from the Middle East. The Renaissance did not begin to revitalize human dignity until tyranny from the East pushed genius to seek refuge in the West, and pushed the West to rise and stand. Thereafter, only when pushed to extremis did the West finally rise again, to stand for spreading human dignity and freedom, i.e., a flowering of free thinkers. Now, that flowering is being retracted, as oligarchs fund faux elites and experts, to trick and wrest to themselves all significant influence and control. The middle class is again being reduced to serf irrelevance and depravity, to mouth only elite catechisms (if they know what’s good for their careers). This will not sustain an expanding economy, nor expanding creativity, nor human decency or liberty. This is prelude to retrenchment to the subhuman.
.
The only way to avoid retrenchment is to revitalize political representation of a middle class of free thinkers. The only way to do that is to right the balance of power, by creating institutions that can check against the international corporate cronyism that is based out of Marxist and Muslim nations. That is the danger the founders failed adequately to check against, and that is the most virulent danger to human decency and liberty today. Yet, no important political party addresses such danger. Why? That’s easy. Both parties are, in main, directly or indirectly, funded by corrupt international crony corporatists. Except in bread and circuses, the middle class remains unorganized, unfunded, and unrepresented.
.
The lower class tends not to know what to do with itself, absent a taskmaster, while the upper class desires to be served. Neither is fond of any independent middle class, which tends to shame both the lower and the upper class. The upper class of inherited wealth is particularly shamed because its members know, in themselves, that there is not a great deal in them that is worth admiring. They don't tend to be creators or producers of great arts or inventions. Rather, they tend only to be buyers and sellers. The lower class is shamed because it's constantly reminded of its deficiencies and perpetual dependence. The lower and upper classes share an interest to hold the middle class in political servitude. The lower class cannot otherwise provide for itself, and the upper class cannot otherwise defend and enforce its leisure and rule. Dinos and Rinos align as Ainos, while middle class conservors of human dignity and freedom remain politically unorganized, unfunded, and unrepresented.
.
Means are being institutionalized to enforce such position in perpetuity. The trend is to a NWO, which will be like a rigid, hierarchical ant pile. The face of humanity will be replaced by a large headed ant. Unless an independent-minded middle class can somehow organize, leverage funding, and sustain viable political representation, the American Republic will be sold out to an empire of hierarchical serfdom, i.e., an Orwellian boot on the face of humanity — forever. Tattooed with a cynically smiling face.
.
Obama-the-Dino must be sent packing. Romney, however, must be closely watched. There is no “mission accomplished” for Conservatives merely by electing a Republican. Indeed, the need to establish a Conservative Political Party will become even more vital. Otherwise, a NWO will be set in concrete upon humanity with nary a whimper. If Obama woke us up, the danger is that Romney will put us back to sleep. The difference between a stagnant antpile and a human race worthy of interest of God and for exploring the cosmos is in the establishment and preservation of a class of free thinkers.
.
.
Did not a similar state of depravity ruin the Roman republic and replace it with a despotic empire, ever more inclined to slavery and repression, ever less standing for anything that could adequately inspire defense against the disintegrating vices invited? Thereafter, by ever more repression and slavery, the Roman empire survived a long time. When it fell, a long period of even greater darkness descended. During that time, a malignant form of religious tyranny spread forth from the Middle East. The Renaissance did not begin to revitalize human dignity until tyranny from the East pushed genius to seek refuge in the West, and pushed the West to rise and stand. Thereafter, only when pushed to extremis did the West finally rise again, to stand for spreading human dignity and freedom, i.e., a flowering of free thinkers. Now, that flowering is being retracted, as oligarchs fund faux elites and experts, to trick and wrest to themselves all significant influence and control. The middle class is again being reduced to serf irrelevance and depravity, to mouth only elite catechisms (if they know what’s good for their careers). This will not sustain an expanding economy, nor expanding creativity, nor human decency or liberty. This is prelude to retrenchment to the subhuman.
.
The only way to avoid retrenchment is to revitalize political representation of a middle class of free thinkers. The only way to do that is to right the balance of power, by creating institutions that can check against the international corporate cronyism that is based out of Marxist and Muslim nations. That is the danger the founders failed adequately to check against, and that is the most virulent danger to human decency and liberty today. Yet, no important political party addresses such danger. Why? That’s easy. Both parties are, in main, directly or indirectly, funded by corrupt international crony corporatists. Except in bread and circuses, the middle class remains unorganized, unfunded, and unrepresented.
.
The lower class tends not to know what to do with itself, absent a taskmaster, while the upper class desires to be served. Neither is fond of any independent middle class, which tends to shame both the lower and the upper class. The upper class of inherited wealth is particularly shamed because its members know, in themselves, that there is not a great deal in them that is worth admiring. They don't tend to be creators or producers of great arts or inventions. Rather, they tend only to be buyers and sellers. The lower class is shamed because it's constantly reminded of its deficiencies and perpetual dependence. The lower and upper classes share an interest to hold the middle class in political servitude. The lower class cannot otherwise provide for itself, and the upper class cannot otherwise defend and enforce its leisure and rule. Dinos and Rinos align as Ainos, while middle class conservors of human dignity and freedom remain politically unorganized, unfunded, and unrepresented.
.
Means are being institutionalized to enforce such position in perpetuity. The trend is to a NWO, which will be like a rigid, hierarchical ant pile. The face of humanity will be replaced by a large headed ant. Unless an independent-minded middle class can somehow organize, leverage funding, and sustain viable political representation, the American Republic will be sold out to an empire of hierarchical serfdom, i.e., an Orwellian boot on the face of humanity — forever. Tattooed with a cynically smiling face.
.
Obama-the-Dino must be sent packing. Romney, however, must be closely watched. There is no “mission accomplished” for Conservatives merely by electing a Republican. Indeed, the need to establish a Conservative Political Party will become even more vital. Otherwise, a NWO will be set in concrete upon humanity with nary a whimper. If Obama woke us up, the danger is that Romney will put us back to sleep. The difference between a stagnant antpile and a human race worthy of interest of God and for exploring the cosmos is in the establishment and preservation of a class of free thinkers.
.
9 comments:
Regarding the media of mass mesmerization, mayhem and murder: Despots always deploy myths to channel populist fears and cravings of the large class of people who otherwise would not know what to do with themselves. The Big Lie is the common denominator among despots. Marxism is a prime example. It advocates an ideal that not only can never be reached, but also works to put entire nations in strait jackets under control of despots. There is little freedom to think or speak except within confines of the party line. Islamism is an even more extreme example of what is essentially the same form of despotism, except that it is promoted to religious fervor instead of merely idealistic fervor. There is, however, another form, which is most dangerously deceitful of all. It is international crony corporatism, posing as saviour of the planet. Oddly enough, much of its financing comes from nations that claim to abhor capitalism, even as their operatives in America extol the benefits of "free trade" with crony corporatists housed in marxist and muslim nations. The common effect of all such Big Lie proponents is to wipe out the political influence of any independent middle class of free thinkers. That is the class the produces and creates almost all worthwhile peaceful applications for art, science, and technology. That is the class the gives humanity dignity enough to be worthy of the interest of God and the exploration of the cosmos. Without that class, humanity is reduced to the signicance of the antpile. Despots do not believe in their own lies. They believe in entitlement to rule, and their client mobs believe in their rulers' false promises. At least until such time as the milk of the middle class dries up.
Aside from the immorality of trying to eliminate merit from functions of redistribution, there is the legal perversity of attempting to impose "equal" redistribution. It's like trying to use central regulation in order to impose quantitative equality in qualitative mores. That simply cannot be done, but the never ending attempts to do it lead to never ending perversions of red tape. Instead of trying to make equal distributions to louts and losers, we should be thinking about what is needed to preserve a viable republic. Think how much better the resources we are wasting on TSA, because we want to avoid unequal profiling, could be applied were such time and effrot directed to the maintenance and improvement of common infrastructure (roads, utilities, parks). How many man hours are utterly wasted in airport lines, while infrastructure goes rotting, while toll roads and port security are sold to Muslim and Marxist investors? Next we will be selling our vote counting. The practically meaningless "social justice" meme is little more than a cloak to obscure the demolition of the republic and the free thinking middle class. Prog plebes feel, but they don't think. Prog patricians think how to grab rule, but they don't feel any love for the republic.
The slippery slope for stealth jihad is greased because of long inculcated prog-pragmatic disdain for principles. Progs believe only in what works to facilitate "social justice." Since they share no principled means or ideals for defining what social justice is, their moral compass consists solely in what appeals to immediate gratifications (i.e., what works now). Despots and demagogues have well learned how this makes prog-prag herd-hives remarkably susceptible to mass deceptions, diversionary fads, fainting spells, and pant-crease fixations. Moreover, the lack of principles blends easily with lack of memory or accountability. This makes it convenient for a failed despot to control the message simply by diverting mass attention to cooly announced political fads.
In time, there is NOTHING the left will not rationalize. Soon, it will be deemed hateful and culturally insensitive for conservatives not to appreciate the normality of Islamic intercourse after death. Ok, lefties. If you have any principles at all, if you can draw any lines at all, how about this one? If you can't draw this one, your credibility should henceforth be zilch with everyone who has two brain cells to rub together.
What is needed is a humane, reasonable definition of religion. Religion is something YOU believe regarding higher moral values, which you cannot empirically prove the validity of. By that definition, so-called atheists who say they have higher moral values are religious. By that definition, forcing behavior of others based only on YOUR religion about what behavior is best for you is, in that respect, NOT a practice of religion. Whatever else it might be (crime, insanity, chauvenism, corpse abuse), it is not a practice of religion to advocate the disfigurement, stoning, corpse abusing, or killing of others on account of your beliefs. To advocate such should not be protected as a practice of religion. To advocate such should be more in the vein of conspiracy to promote crime. If you advocated that white men should meet five times a day to receive instruction for how to assert mastery and control over all others, and then proceeded to actually conduct such meetings, I doubt such practice should be protected as the free expression of religion or speech.
I agree that the efficiences that are promised by governmental wiping out of middle men are lies, because hardly anyone in government employ seeks to make government efficient. When they do, they don't get promoted. This is because their superiors seek to build little fiefdoms. Moreover, our national governance is now too much in thrall to corrupt interests. I agree, if our Constitution still meant much, it does not avail much role for Feds in health care. However, I confess my faith in any retrievable sense in the Constitution is damaged. Our Constitution has been too much and too long ignored or papered over. More and more, it seems to me that people simply rationalize their own philosophy for what government should be about, and then they somehow find justification for such rationalization in the Constitution. This trend is driven by very powerful interests. I don't quite see how it can be stopped. I rather doubt a sensible return can at this late date be made to strict interpretation of the Constitution. I expect the political movement that forges a consistent approach may more likely push to get its dogma accepted, while casting competing notions as heresies. No doubt, it helps inspire followers by claiming to be on the only true path to the light of the Constitution, and it can be devastating to admit that the Constitution no longer avails such true light. However, American society is now so divided and lost in multiculturalism that I think Constitutionalism is a rear guard for an attempt at an orderly retreat. Constitutionalism, by itself, in a society as divided and dumbed down as ours, with the middle class as unrepresented as it is, will not save the Republic. The Middle Class urgently needs to assimilate in respect of decently sustainable, common sense values. So long as it fails to see that, cries of constitutionalism will become the last faint voices of a beautiful baby being smothered in its crib.
Re: "educate as many others as possible as to the proper role for the federal government"
I agree with this. I also thnk one can consider the "proper role" by reference to more than the Constitution. One can also consider the proper role by reference to what it takes in a world of competition among groups, tribes, countries, and cross-national crony corporatists to estasblish and preseve a culture of human freedom, dignity, and decency. One can consider what it takes to continue to exist in a hostile world. One can consider that if one pushes too far along a single dimensional scale (such as "freedom," without respect to dignity and decency), one will often fall off the chart. Freedom can turn back to despotism, depending on point of view, context, and purpose. Example: To accord too much freedom to nations of Marxist, Muslim, and tribute-demanding despotism to engage in "free trade" (to buy and sell U.S. politicians and influence) easily becomes to accord despotism against Americans. Another example: To define freedom of "religion" as including Islamic promotion of Shariah becomes to condone active conspiracies to undermine freedom. If we don't get the existential questions right, it won't matter how pure our notions of constitutionalism are.
If the Constitution is like a strict program, then it will be subject to a fundamental rule for programs: Garbage in, garbage out. If the Constitution requires that we not regulate to prevent foes of liberty from accumulating means and positions by which to overturn liberty, then we will have made ourselves powerless to prevent its self destruction. The Constitution does not have magic capacity to hold fundamental rules of existence at bay. It does not have power to preserve liberty while in gross disproportionality empowering and enriching despots, crony oligarchs, and irreconcilable group foes, such as nations of Marxism and Islam. The idea of requiring that free citizens must submit to allow the lands, goods, and industries of their home land to be purchased in "free trade" by groups bent on imposing servitude is suicidal insanity. A problem with free-trader idealists is analogical with a problem with selfish-gene idealists: They remain oblivious that the competition that guides evolution proceeds on more than an individual basis; it also proceeds on a multi-leveled group basis.
Regarding the primary system for party selection of candidates: Something about marching through states one or two at a time seems to enhance the opportunity for the most cynical and monied of hedge fund interests for investing in the bribing and recruiting of useful idiots. That translates into ever more radical and unsustainable promises to carved-up divisions among the electorate. Divide and rule radical populism and demagoguery! Who but a crony demagogue could ever be cynical enough or well enough financed to pursue such a course? This may be why nearly everyone learns to think of himself as a member of some minority: so he can rally to promises of snake oil charlatans. This may be why our politics plummets ever lower each election cycle. No selfish minded minority will go unexploited and unpandered! At this rate, I don't think it likely that we can evade a world-federalized antpile of collectivizing Marxists, Muslims, and Big Brother Despots. Problem is, not every minority can be tolerated. That would defy basic logic. At the end of the day, demagogues will have to make sacrifices. First they will come for x, then y, then z, and so on. Nazism, fascism, gulagism, jihadism, ethnic cleansing ... the eternally recurrent rinse cycle of moral bankruptcy. Sadly, we seem not yet to have developed institutions or philosophy that can hold this kind of recurrent group insanity in check.
Factoring subjective motives as if they could be objectified, without need of experienced judgment, does seem dicey. Can one objectively factor the propensity for this or that person to lie or stretch when it seems convenient to slip a lie by? I doubt a judge in a court trial will often allow mere bolstering of credibility of a witness whose credibility has not been objectively called into question. I doubt you will ordinarily see experts at detecting truth testifying to objective probablity of falsity of a withess's testimony based on various tests or tells. Generally, the jury will be sole judge of credibility, and its members, I hope, will draw from judgment borne of experience. Even so, given experience in selecting and evaluating key factors, there do seem to be people who succeed in improving their success in betting on horses, trends, and stocks. Problem is, some of them catalyze the trend. Do whales follow trends, or do trends follow whales? At high enough levels of power, it seems "practical truth" is often made to be whatever the highest levels of power want it to be. So long as the Obama Regime retains power among key players, it seems the "practical truth" and agenda will remain that he was born in Hawaii. Powerful Regimes often don't need to be concerned with actual truth, so long as they can cover their own malevolence by directing attention to supposed defects of their opponents. The magic of misdirection, indeed!
Post a Comment