CONSTRUCTION AND DECONSTRUCTION OF DECENCY

Free thinking conservers of liberty promote a collective civilization by internalizing shared values that are self evident or empathetically intuitive in their culture. Corrupt libertines of abuse promote a collective civilization by beguiling the ignorant to accept the externally forced rule of the corrupt. As the corrupt become more powerful and the ignorant become more desperate and poor, they tend to make crass common cause against free thinkers. Free thinkers cannot conserve liberty against such corruption unless they remain vigilant to check against perverse accumulations of power and provide enough of a safety net to preserve the hope and good will of the less able and talented. If liberty is to survive, wealth must be limited short of incitement to despotism, and poverty must be alleviated short of desperation.

.
CONSTRUCTION AND DECONSTRUCTION OF DECENCY:

.

CHILDREN OF DECONSTRUCTIONISM: There are people who exist who like perpetually to play dress up. They like to recognize the sometimes richness in poverty, genius in idiocy, wisdom in ignorance, truthiness in playing false, and heroism in cowardice. Should this mean that medical schools must award proportionate admissions and student loans to poor, ignorant, deluded cowards? Should it mean that those who prefer to use words in their ordinary meanings are hateful phobes and racists, who must be ridiculed and often punished? Should it mean that decent civilization must equally deconstruct and annihilate all discriminatory distinctions?

.

GOD: Whatever the Information we're massing, we're massing it together. This necessitates that words be accorded meanings.  The avatars with which our perspectives of consciousness bond undergo pattern shifts, yet consciousness itself is perpetually required, even though it undergoes phase shifts and its avatars assimilate and accumulate changing insights and Information. Nothing evolves or unfolds to the sequential record of informationally digitized manifestation without the previously participatory, simultaneous or preset, idealistic or representative, approval or disapproval of at least one perspective of conscious will --- whether primitive, organic, human, or holistically field-like. Consciousness is variously iterated, but, stripping all religious models to their essential worth, the common field of Consciousness may be conceptualized as "God," i.e., the basis for intuitive, empathetic, moral interfunctioning, unfolding, and evolution.

.
FOUNDATION OF MORALITY: Conscious will, communicating intuitively and empathetically among its iterative perspectives, is the foundation for all moral signification. It is the connector of spiritual good faith and good will, the qualitative basis for the Great Commandment and the Golden Rule, above all quantitative pretenses of measuring science and physics. There is no moral principle that can be derived purely from physics. However, there is a moral reconciler, a still quiet voice, that guides physical significations, which abides in self evidence, not dependent on any axiom of measurement. Its existence is reasonably intuited in self evidence. It's unfolding purposes are empathetically intuited. Its communications are signified and transmitted in analogies, figures of speech, models, and conceptualizations. All of physical signification abides first as a figure of speech of communication of conscious will, before such physics can then be related for measuring in terms of variously fluxing models, which models cannot themselves be unified because they are nothing in themselves.
.

PROGRESS OF CIVILIZATION: I cannot reasonably speak to whether perfection or heaven are attainable. However, I can speak in good faith and good will (intuitive empathy) to an ideal that I envision as being worth pursuing. That is the establishment and preservation of civilized governance that avails decent dignity for the exchange of communications among free thinking perspectives of consciousness.
.
IDEAL VS PRACTICALITY:  That is an ideal. It can best be nurtured by assimilating a fair and independent minded middle class of free thinkers. However, the ideal recognizes a practical reality: Even the best of middle classes will always be accompanied by (1) corrupt predators who seek to acquire skills and leverage to obtain despotic hegemony, as well as by (2) those easy prey and perpetual children who, because of physical or mental infirmity or disposition, can never quite grow up to become independently competing avatars for their own thoughts. A decent civilization needs institutions for checking and balancing the tendencies of the first, and it needs a reasonable safety net for the second.
.
ALIGNMENT OF PREDATORS AND PREY:  This produces a natural alignment among predators and prey: predators beguile the easily beguiled to believe they will be protected if they help bring down the big game, i.e., the middle class. The more the middle class remains oblivious and at work, assuming all others share its good faith and good will, the fatter, slower, and more attractive it becomes as big game. The more the middle class insists on an impossibility, that government abandon everyone to their own talents, including the talentless (the infantile, senile, idiotic, handicapped, addicted, mal-conditioned and mal-educated), the more the lower class reasons it has no choice but to align itself to the mercy of canopy crony corporatists, who have no faith higher than their own advancement. Decent civliization is not easy. It seems to require billions of years of evolution. It requires evolution of a middle class that's wise enough to check amoral predators while simultaneously providing a safety net for the infirm, the childlike, and the ignorant, without making the safety net so enticing as to encourage lives of sloth and unnecessary dependence.

.
GOOD FAITH FREE THINKERS: Good faith free thinkers must be aware of the exposure of easy prey to corrupt predators. Skills have been developed and networked to quickly reduce most unprotected people to the status of perpetual debt slaves. Astonishing "progress" has been made in the science of advertising to get people to trade debt enslavement for baubles. The more the number of people enslaved, the more those people feel little hope ... unless they align to help predators enslave yet more. The goal of a decent civilization of free thinkers is not advanced by advocating that the poor and infirm should aspire to become rich like the predatory.
.

Universal Operating System

.

Nothing unfolds to the sequential record of informationally digitized manifestation without the previously participatory, simultaneous or preset, idealistic or representative, approval or disapproval of some perspective of consciousness --- whether primitive, holistic, organic, or human.
.
For a perspective of Consciousness to see a thing requires that it be reduced to a recognizable representation.  For a program to relate a thing to its computations requires that it be reduced to a recognizable representation.  This does not require that the thing actually be reduced to a representation, but that it be recognized by that which is relating to it and processing it as being reduced to a representation.  In a way, recognition and recordation of things and patterns is a primitive marker of consciousness.
.
A representation of a thing is not the thing itself.  Neither we nor computers can sense things as they are, yet the mathematics by which relations relate can avail incredibly precise measurements.  We can model, conceptualize, program, and compute about that which we sense, to try to make consistent, coherent, complete sense of it.  However, if the purposes of consciousness are never complete, then we will never make complete sense of our beingness.  As our purposes change, our approaches to completeness may change.  It is not necessarily clear that we make "progress" towards a complete model or conception of all that is and can be.  Even the "best" model would depend on purpose, perspective, and context.
.
Can any model accord a way to reconcile that which manifests and can be manifested with that which we should seek to make manifest?  Or that which quantifiably is with that which qualitatively should be?  Can any model avail a way of communicating sensibly about moral concerns, without beclouding empirical methods?  A coherent moral truth may abide with most forms of sacred myths and parables, yet defy being assimilated so long as so many people conflate the qualitative meaningfulness of myths with mathematically measurable reality.  Is there a way to respect the various myths, wring good from evil out of the Babel, and assimilate a common way for translating and communicating morally civilizing concerns?  I suspect there may be.  The way would seem to relate consciousness with feedback programming.
.
.
UNIVERSAL OPERATING SYSTEM:
.

EXISTENCE ("UNIVERSAL COMPUTER") --- Our Operating System can be conceptualized as being organized, consisting of:

ESSENCE ("NATURE") --- Source Formulas that have capacity to interfunction, while holding to system-wide conservation to zero.

PRIMITIVE WILL --- That which, in feedback of apprehensive forebodings and appreciative postbodings, guides that which the System seeks to express, bringing a search for meaningful order out of chaos out of an otherwise conservation of zero.

MIND ("QUALITATIVE CONSCIOUSNESS") --- A Decoding Algorithm, which has Iterative capacity to apprehend, abstract, represent, and communicate interpretatons of interpretations of interpretations of such interfunctions, but which does not have capacity to decode itself.

CELLULAR BODY AND BRAIN ("BONDED MEMORY") --- Capacity to store sequentially established representations of Information, for availing Avatars or loci of organized operations within contexts of experiential manifestation.

EPIPHENOMENAL SIGNIFICATION --- The byproduct of such interfunctioning, decoding, and storeage of Information is the signification and quantitative measuring of what we often call "substantive physics."

ITERATIVE INTERCONNECTION --- Innate connective capacity to experience and project intuitive empathy, i.e., capacity to project civilizing, fluxing interpretations, "as if" they were fluxing between holistic fields and particular perspectives.  "God" is the same for each of us, being that aspect of each of us that fluxes to function in field capacity, as if that which it apprehends and appreciates in such capacity should be applied to the universe as a whole.  That aspect may be approached in enlightening meditation.

.

There abides and exists a thing in itself, which I call an Operating System or Bank of Information, which has capacity to be fluxed in infinite iterative ways, yet always remains the same essential thing. That Bank-in-itself is not a person, nor need it be conceptualized as being conscious like a person, whether or not holistically, in any way comparable to the consciousness that is iterated through each of our perspectives. Still, that Source of Information would seem to have capacity to interfunction and flux with itself. Information can be represented in formulas, and formulas can be conceptualized as constituting Information. The Bank of Information would seem to have some meta capacity or qualitative impetus to flux.

.
Once a formula fluxes with other formulas, it would seem to be bonded with a perspective, i.e., a perspective of consciousness, regardless of whether in some permutations it may be thought dim versus "self aware" versus of infinite capacity. There is feedback between and among such meta-formulas of iterations of perspectives of Information.
.
Thus, complex iterations of perspectives may acquire capacities to represent, receive, interpret, sense, react with, transmit, communicate, and become self-aware of experiences of informational interfunctioning. Such iterations may become like human beings. Feedback from humans and other perspectives affects the quality for how Information is iterated. How we relate to the Bank affects what the Bank can avail to us. Each of us is empathetically connected as an iteration of the same quality of consciosness of the Information availed from the Bank.
.
Eventually, the formulas that comprise the body with which my perspective is bonded are consumed and re-expressed in different forms by other formulas and perspectives. However, consciousness continues to be expressed, and, indeed, cannot fail to be expressed in some respect, so long as meta formulas of Information abide and interfunction. Thus, the Bank reconciles all iterations of conscious expressiveness, and all such iterations affect how the reconciliation of the Bank unfolds. That is, each perspective has innate interest and empathy for how the Bank is preserved and what is reconciled to be in sequence pursued.
.
Thus, we are each connected, and the Bank is our Source. We each empathize to seek to intuit what the Bank should want, and try at some level to be guided by our apprehensions and appreciations of such wants. In so doing, we practice being receptive to the Source for guiding the quality of consciousness through which all our perspectives are reconciled. The quality of our meta-consciousness, spiritual empathy, and innate intuition can be experienced and lived, but it cannot be confined to measures. Its iterations of consciousness transcend, but its ideal (Son?) and its common essence (Holy Ghost?) of consciousness is/are as eternal as the existence of the Bank of Information (God-Source). The quality of separateness among iterations is derivative, but the essence of their commonality is as real as the Bank.

****

DERIVATIVE REALITY:  Substance in matter, energy, and body is “real” only in being derivative (in respect of apprehension, interpretation, and represented storeage of Information) of iteration of Consciousness. That is, Physics and physical bodies consist of stores of Information (formulas for transforming and transferring conservations and reorganizations among equations). Some of these stores of Information are sensed, perceived, represented, and communicated about, by iterative perspectives of Consciousness. And some of these stores of Information constitute bodies and brains for leveraging capacities for perspectives of Consciousness to store and trade communications about perceptions about representations of formulaic organizations and stores of Information.

.

SYNCHRONOCITY OF AVATARS AND PERCEPTIONS:  Divisions among forms that flux as interfunctioning formulas bring with their digital fluxes, separations, and interfunctions — simultaneously — bondings for iterative identities and perspectives of Consciousness. Consciousness must either bond its Identity with a bodily store of Information, or Consciousness must experience and sense such Information as if it were a separate body, apart from the locus of a bonded perspective of Consciousness.

.

PHYSICAL ENTROPY AND SPIRITUAL EVOLUTION:  It is often noted that the measurable Entropy or extent of Disorganization of Substance proceeds along an arrow or direction of increase, while the amount or complexity of Information seems also to increase. That is, Substance tends to become more Disorganized, while Information tends to become more Organized or Complex. The longer physical organization decreases, the more informational organization (and conscious experience of it?) seems to increase. The more bodies and brains die, ceteris paribus, the more complex and potentially powerful seem to become the bodies and brains that evolve and follow.

.

REINCARNATION:  Separate iterations of Consciousness seem to end (die) as bodies die, yet, insofar as Consciousness itself abides as an Identity derivative of the Source, subsequent iterations tend to absorb, recycle, and render even more complex the experiential Information of previous iterations. Each iteration is connected, and each iteration participates in the dance of feedback that guides the evolutionary adventures of Consciousness, and each iteration is bound to avail subsequent re-absorptions and re-expressions, with ever more complex forms and ecologies. Iterations are mortal to their defining and limiting contexts, while Consciousness itself is perpetual.

. 

POTENTIALITY IS NOT ALTOGETHER UNLIKE THE BLANK SLATE AVAILED BY AN ETCH A SKETCH: The common beingness of our connected iterations of consciousness is not altogether unlike the blank slate of infinite potential that is innate to a process of computing, whereby good and evil are guided by a dance of perpetual unfolding of choices made and pre-made in appreciative feedback to apprehensions.

.

Fundamentals drive consciousness to seek to learn and experience its expressive potentiality.
There are no computing problems; only ineffective programming.

"Roll me up and smoke me when I die."

Capitalism When There's Too Much Labor

When more labor was needed, then laborers, managers, and inventors had opportunity.  And entrepreneurs had to pay liveable wages.  Now, we have computerized tech and global competition.  Labor is either cheap, or else producers relocate where it is cheap.  This spikes the distribution, so the gulf widens between haves and have nots.  Given the apparently permanent oversupply of labor, wages will continue to go proportionately down, and the gulf will widen.  Advanced tech, machine labor, and robotics will help lower prices.  However, there will remain two big problems of distribution:  (1) How to spread buying power in order to avail needed consumerism and to balance political representation?  (2) How to spread buying power based in merit, rather than based in the moral hazard of mob demands of equal entitlementarianism?

What new jobs can allow us to remain a market-merit-based economy, rather than a bureaucratic-redistributionist economy?  Might a progressive tax on individual consumption help?  A government job corps, to make more service jobs?  Government taxation of the rich, with expenditures for infrastructure rebuilding and maintenance?  Well, there's a big problem:  We cannot finance large government expenditures while the cost of servicing interest on our national debt continues to accelerate.  If we tried, the main effect would be to enrich foreign cronies.  And it would do little proportionate good to increase taxes on the most wealthy, because they can and would more than recover.  After all, they own and operate processes for duping the masses, electing the cronies, writing the laws, and printing the money.  Pay more to the masses, and they will just print-kickback-hedge for more for themselves.

So how do we get populations down to levels such that labor will again be in demand, so we don't make Earth an overpopulated and impoverished eyesore? Do we just continue on the path we're on and let widespread disaster and nature thin the herd?  Dems and Repubs are proceeding in parallel along the same path to disaster:  Crony ownership of mass labor!  Repubs see the solution as allowing cronies to make even proportionately more money than they are.  Dems see the solution as putting governmental bureaucrats in charge of markets, with the bureaucrats to be ruled by politicians, and the politicians to be owned by investors in owning governments.  The "new capitalism" appears to consist in the buying and selling of politicians and governance, and both political parties cater to this NWO.

So we have an overabundance of labor, oligarchic consolidation of ownership of most institutions of society, and a widening gulf between those who are represented versus those who get easily distracted by cheap promises and demagogic gimmicks (like amnesty, drugs, gay marriage, wagging the dog, and free college education, i.e., indoctrination for wanting to be a eusocialitist).  Most of all, we have a citizenry well trained in abject stupidity.  This is not the way to social utopianism!  It's the way to the royally-ruled antpile.  The only hope would seem to abide in a spiritual awakening, to counter the prevailing secular stupidity.  However, institutions of any intelligent spiritual insight have been essentially coopted or gutted by the establishment, while Islam is waved in to continue the destruction.

So we're in a state of affairs for which we have little experience and apparently less insight.  In this state of affairs, austerity won't work, and governmental priming won't work.  Had we enlightened leadership and a well-informed citizenry of good faith and good will, we could overcome this multi-culti-beast of a problem.  However, what we have instead are massively inculcated stupidity and secular corruption, perhaps of a scale never before encountered. So, either prepare to be an ant, or stock up on gold, guns, and god.

Dead Ants Society

The Essential Quality of Consciousness

.

Consciousness is the conservator of conceptualization. Consciousness does not function as a physically measurable force. Rather, it functions as a conceptual facilitator and conservator. Without Conscious Will --- either active or stored, present or potential, manifesting or preset --- there would be no Information that could be stored.  At its most essential, Consciousness is that meta function which facilitates meaningfulness by borrowing from nothingness. Meaningfulness is the qualitative counterpart to that which Consciousness conserves and expresses, via quantitative significations. All that is measurably signified --- original and unfolding --- consists with bubbles manifesting forth out of nothingness, facilitated by Consciousness.

.

Conceptualization avails freedom to Consciousness; conservation avails parameter-limiting feedback to Consciousness. Without conservation (limits and laws), there would be no freedom. There is no freedom except under law. Feedback avails the signification of appreciable choices. The feedback by which Consciousness functions consists via a mathematical (digital-based) dance of apprehension (fore-boding) and appreciation (after-boding). The mathematical average of the dance as a whole always conserves and balances out to zero (quantitative nothingness). Conceptualization of math, borrowed from zero, yields conceptualization of fluxing forms, which yields conceptualization of space-time. Reconciliation back to zero yields conceptualization of matter-energy. The dance of conceptual conservation proceeds in digital like feedback between parts (particular fluxing perspectives of consciousness) and the whole (holistically synchronizing perspective of consciousness).

.

That which is conceptualized as good is that which is adjudged helpful towards that which is sought to be reconciled. That which is conceptualized as neutral is that which is adjudged of vanishing relevance towards that which is sought. That which is conceptualized as bad is that which is adjudged counterproductive to that which is sought. Except in respect of a digital dance of feedback between perspectives of Consciousness, concepts of good, neutral, and bad would have little or no significance in themselves.

*******

The method of scientific empiricism is the only way to learn the quantitative formulas that delimit the parameters of the human biosphere. That system of conservation is the system within which conscious will conceptualizes.  However, the method of scientific empiricism is not suited to apprehend that to which conscious will should guide its conceptualizations insofar as there remain degrees of freedom to so guide.  There is a feedback relationship between that which is conserved and that which is conceptualized.  Conceptualization affects the apparent reality of the quantitatively testable.  Of course, the capacity of a single perspective of consciousness to so affect the conservational system is much more diluted than the sum of the capacity of all perspectives, or of the presently synchronizing or pre-willed and pre-set capacity of the holistic perspective.  Even so, the qualitative aspect of participating conscious will is a prime reality, which is clear to experience and enlightened intuition, even though, by definition, it is not itself subject to quantitative proof.
.

Free Thinking Soon To Be Outlawed

Incompetents cannot be forced to be free. Moreover, persons who are not independently competent are needed for drudge work. Competent, producing, creative, middle-class republicans need to allow those who want to perform and to supervise drudge work to do so, while somehow retaining time, resources, and opportunity to be free to create. In Huxley’s Brave New World, there was a balance among classes, so that members of each class were kept satisfied with their situations. Somewhat similarly, the American Constitution sought to establish and preserve a republic by providing for checks and balances among various institutions of law and governance. However, the founders did not adequately foresee or provide for the day when the elites who run international corporations would acquire so much lopsided control over all institutions of mass finance, indoctrination into depravity (media and academia), and governance (international crony buying and selling of political influence). This lopsided and depraved state of affairs is now such that the producing and creating middle class is being milked, bilked, abused, and despised from all sides --- even as the borders of the country are being erased by deliberate neglect, under false cover of free trade with Marxists and Muslims. An independent, republican nation cannot be sustained when its middle class backbone is broken and its borders are despised.
.
Did not a similar state of depravity ruin the Roman republic and replace it with a despotic empire, ever more inclined to slavery and repression, ever less standing for anything that could adequately inspire defense against the disintegrating vices invited? Thereafter, by ever more repression and slavery, the Roman empire survived a long time. When it fell, a long period of even greater darkness descended. During that time, a malignant form of religious tyranny spread forth from the Middle East. The Renaissance did not begin to revitalize human dignity until tyranny from the East pushed genius to seek refuge in the West, and pushed the West to rise and stand. Thereafter, only when pushed to extremis did the West finally rise again, to stand for spreading human dignity and freedom, i.e., a flowering of free thinkers. Now, that flowering is being retracted, as oligarchs fund faux elites and experts, to trick and wrest to themselves all significant influence and control. The middle class is again being reduced to serf irrelevance and depravity, to mouth only elite catechisms (if they know what’s good for their careers). This will not sustain an expanding economy, nor expanding creativity, nor human decency or liberty. This is prelude to retrenchment to the subhuman.
.
The only way to avoid retrenchment is to revitalize political representation of a middle class of free thinkers. The only way to do that is to right the balance of power, by creating institutions that can check against the international corporate cronyism that is based out of Marxist and Muslim nations. That is the danger the founders failed adequately to check against, and that is the most virulent danger to human decency and liberty today. Yet, no important political party addresses such danger. Why? That’s easy. Both parties are, in main, directly or indirectly, funded by corrupt international crony corporatists. Except in bread and circuses, the middle class remains unorganized, unfunded, and unrepresented.
.
The lower class tends not to know what to do with itself, absent a taskmaster, while the upper class desires to be served. Neither is fond of any independent middle class, which tends to shame both the lower and the upper class. The upper class of inherited wealth is particularly shamed because its members know, in themselves, that there is not a great deal in them that is worth admiring. They don't tend to be creators or producers of great arts or inventions. Rather, they tend only to be buyers and sellers. The lower class is shamed because it's constantly reminded of its deficiencies and perpetual dependence. The lower and upper classes share an interest to hold the middle class in political servitude. The lower class cannot otherwise provide for itself, and the upper class cannot otherwise defend and enforce its leisure and rule. Dinos and Rinos align as Ainos, while middle class conservors of human dignity and freedom remain politically unorganized, unfunded, and unrepresented.
.
Means are being institutionalized to enforce such position in perpetuity. The trend is to a NWO, which will be like a rigid, hierarchical ant pile. The face of humanity will be replaced by a large headed ant. Unless an independent-minded middle class can somehow organize, leverage funding, and sustain viable political representation, the American Republic will be sold out to an empire of hierarchical serfdom, i.e., an Orwellian boot on the face of humanity — forever. Tattooed with a cynically smiling face.
.
Obama-the-Dino must be sent packing. Romney, however, must be closely watched. There is no “mission accomplished” for Conservatives merely by electing a Republican. Indeed, the need to establish a Conservative Political Party will become even more vital. Otherwise, a NWO will be set in concrete upon humanity with nary a whimper. If Obama woke us up, the danger is that Romney will put us back to sleep. The difference between a stagnant antpile and a human race worthy of interest of God and for exploring the cosmos is in the establishment and preservation of a class of free thinkers.
.

Borrowing From Zero --- Causation, Correlation and Signification

.
ARBITRARINESS OF CAUSE AND EFFECT:  Does that which is effect and that which is cause depend on perspective, context, and purpose?  Insofar as unconscious "forces," do any such "things" really abide in themselves, apart from consciousness?  How can we empirically know whether chronology is always conserved by natural law versus renormalized by meta (non-empirical)-consciousness?  Does effect always follow cause, or can cause follow effect?  Does some character of the cosmos synchronize to make each decision even before each particularly conscious body apprehends that it has made a decision?  What is the character of the flux in feedback between apprehensions (fore-bodings) and appreciations (after-bodings)?  When are after-bodings fore-bodings, and when are fore-bodings after-bodings?  When can that which causes a rationaliztion be reasonably considered as having alreay rationalized the rationalization?  How is feedback between the Holism and its Parts synchronized?  Does the perspective of the Whole borrow against the Sum of its parts, and vice versa, does the Sum of the perspectives borrow against the Whole?  When, how, and why may a cause refocus itself as an effect?
.

BORROWING FROM ZERO:  Consciousness is that which can signify by borrowing from zero.  Regardless of what we measure or how carefully we measure, every "thing" that we can measure owes a conservational debt to zero. That is, our physical universe bubbled out from nothingness, and it will collapse back into nothingness. The "things" we measure and quantify are sequential mirages, such that every attempt to complete a measure necessarily recedes. If there abides any eternal or lasting entity or purpose, it abides in respect of meta properties and feedback that we, in our communicative significations, cannot quantify, but only indirectly experience, intuit, and empathize about. The only truth for us is that we can experience choosing, and we can tinker with how to pursue that which we choose, but we will never fully grasp any "real thing." However, as we make and change our choices, we can apprehend tactics for pursuing them, and such tactics will yield varying aspects of success (or truth value, or "truthiness"). The only "thing" that remains (everywhere and for all time and sequence) constant in its signification is change. The only non-trivial truth is that our experiences of conscious identity are derivative of an immeasurably entailed Source, with which we may or may not enjoy (or believe to enjoy) a meta-intuitive and empathetic relationship. In respect of that, we can choose to pursue a decent civilization of human liberty, or we can lose ourselves in pursuing no encompassing purpose apart from drug and hormone induced highs, derivative of hallucinations of "things" (and wars to mine or steal them).

.

SPIRITUAL EMPATHY: Spiritual empathy abides with caring, deceit, and wonder, and it is signified to be expressed in quantifiables. Spiritual empathy is the source of quantifiable communications (significations), not the byproduct. One exists more authentically by conceptualizing how expressions of empathy may be signified among potentially unlimited quantifiables, than by seeking somehow to confine or banish spirituality as a mere delusion. Science should better enhance the expressive signification of spiritual empathy, than try to prove or zero out spiritual empathy, either as entity or non-entity. In expressing oneself, one either conceptualizes that spiritual empathy abides, or one does not. The only “evidence” of spiritual empathy is non-empirical, non-scientifically testable. The evidence is in the living and experiencing. Quantifiables have nothing to do with proving such a pure qualitative. That said, those who resolve to live as if spiritual empathy were a non-entity are not reasonably expected to stand for much beyond the narrow perimeter of their self interests. Indeed, they will tend to believe there is not really any such a property as unselfishness (projective identification beyond delusions of matter).
.
SPIRITUAL FEEDBACK: The way the holism produces and guides seemingly particular perspectives has to do with how immaterial feedback is conducted between the signifying holistic perspective and the sensing particularistic perspectives. Every aspect that is signified is, at some level, sensed, and every aspect that is sensed is, at some level, signified. However, a particular perspective does not have capacity simultaneously to sense and signify the same interpreted aspect. Rather, there is a break in the simultaneity that avails feedback, hence chronological communication. That which unfolds is in respect of interfunctioning between sensing and signifying. It is not “caused” merely by what we sense to be unconscious signification of “mass.”
.
CAUSATION: Scientists and Spiritualists alike seek to understand causation. CAUSATION can be considered under many perspectives, contexts, and purposes. It can be considered under many headings, such as the following, which are not mutually exclusive, nor do I claim to know whether they are exhaustive:

1) Forces (weak, strong, radiating, gravitational);

2) Determinants (directed, random, chosen, evolving, guided, natural, artificial);

3) Transformants (sharing, exchanging, adding, losing, mutating, blueprinting);

4) Fields (multi-dimensional, 3-D waves, 2-D strings, 1-D points, wave-particle fluxes and collapses);

5) Particles (zero-conserving, virtual-borrowing, space-occupying, mass-carrying, charged neutral and polarized, paired and single, reactive or transformative, information carrying, size measuring, dark, bosons, ultimate, God particles);

6) Space-time occupancy (thinginess, massiness, hardness, exclusiveness, additiveness, space-distortion capacity, time-sequence-borrowing capacity);

7) Inertia (directional momentum, acceleration);

8) Densities (weight, massiness, reactiveness, inertness, temperature, vibration);

9) Detectibility (integrity, size, speed, direction, duration, alternating convertibility, testability, observability);

10) Direction (singular, repulsion, attraction, pushing, pulling, gluing, charged, polarized, angular, spin, orbit, intensity, amplitude, frequency, alternating);

11) Measurable Completeness (coherence, consistency, continuosity, digital discreteness, paradoxical, ambiguous, overlapping across logical categories, defying set restricted logical classification, trivalent defying of bivalent rule of the excluded middle);

12) Relations (essential and paradoxical thing in itself, ultimate particle, bonded, paired, annihilated, asymmetrical, directional, simultaneous, sequential, virtual, borrowed, catalytic, back feeding, transformational, fluxing, translatable, representative, signalizing, communicative, conservational yet unlimited, creative yet magical);
13) Explanatory Value (morally qualitative, empirically quantitative, sequential, predicting, controlling, replicating, statistically reliable, causal, associative, epiphenomenal, byproduct, delusional, conceptual, self authenticating, magical);

14) Information representing and storing capacity (picture defining and transmitting capacity, quantitative measurability, empirical confirmability, modeling and mapping capacity, logical consistency);

15) Re-Normativeness of Sequentiality (adjustability to relative standard based on point of view, context, and focus of purpose, resistence to creative re-conceptualization, preclusion of preservation of quantitative-based knowledge of travel back and forth in time, chronological protection mechanism, inter-changing virtuality of cause and effect);

16) Potentiality (mathematical, digital, sequential, conservational, quantitatively balanced to zero yet infinite, finite yet unbounded, unitary yet changing, fluxing yet vibrational, identical yet particular, qualitatively purposeful yet eternally unsatisfied, honest yet deceiving, ephemeral yet normatively measurable, timeless yet chronological, logical yet metaphysical — we know not what it is, but we know that it is not limited in its potential to that which it presently presents);
17) Intuitability (knowledge, belief, doubt, empirical confirmability, intuitive self fulfillment, truth value for reconciling non-quantitative qualitatives in respect of pursuits of conscious fulfillment);

18) Purposefulness (moral, good, evil, neutral, competitive, cooperative, empathetic, caring, connived);

19) Identity (iteration, polarity, projectibility, quality, holonic relativity);

20) Significativeness (amenability to modeling for measuring, however incomplete);

21) Holonic (synchronization between and among perspectives of the whole and of the parts).
.

SIGNIFICATION --- CONCEPTUAL COMMUNICATION AND BUILDING ON BACKS OF FAIRIES: Naming of aspects of particles sometimes seems similar to priests naming of aspects of God. As if naming or conceptualizing can somehow box God in, or magically constitute some real attribute or name-in-itself for whatever may constitute the Ephemeral Essence. We name particles as if we could hope to categorize and control the entire zoo of potential experience. As if our naming, conceptualizing, conjuring, measuring, and tinkering could participate in the unfolding creation and expression of some kind of meta-essential reality-in-itself. Might it thus be? Certainly, naming is useful. It helps us conceive and tinker. But it does not define, confine, or exclusively exhaust the entire quantifiability of all that is potentially signifiable. Nor will we ever succeed in categorizing and collecting a complete and entire set of mutually exclusive and exhaustive particles or concepts by which we could imagine of make up quantifiable reality. We cannot reasonably hope for that kind of scientific advancement. Yet, we can enhance significations that help us tinker and produce astonishing technological marvels. That is an aspect of the freedom that is expressed, through the feedback effect of our perspectives of Will dancing with God’s freedom of will. All that we experience and propose is derivative of the cloud or essential essence of God's unfolding facilitation of a dance of Will. All of conscious Identity is dependent on a same synchronizing cloud, an Ephemeral Essence, in respect of which are derived all measurable and quantitative aspects (significations) of causes, troubles, pains, pursuits, deceits, empathies, insights, and intuitions.
.
IMMATERIALITY: We do not sense any thing as it really is, in itself, for there is no way for a mortal to directly, empirically, or measurably sense a thing-in-itself. Instead, we apprehend and experience sensations of relations: the observed relation; the unconscious context of observation; the conscious participation in the observation. The quality of our participations and apprehensions feed back, to relate to the quality of synchronizing apprehensions of the Holism. Thus, there is constant, continuous, digital feedback and signification among relations in consciousness --- from and between the perspective of the part and the perspective of the holism.
.
SOURCE: The Source of such feedback is the source of consciousness, perhaps even of consciousness itself. What if our bodies and apprehensions are tricked out significations of their fluxes? Of which, beyond our bodies, we also are a part? What if “they” (previous evolutions of conscious beings from other planets) have already evolved to superior state, to garden their empathies and creative interests through us, as vicarious significations? What if our roles and duties are to function, in part, as avatars, to experience and feel, so that they also can, through us, signify? Once Beings of Consciousness harness the exponentially explosive potentiality of imaginative consciousness, they may have little reason to preserve museums or archeological records, or worlds of their evolution, from relatively fast ravages of inter-stellar expressions of force and fluxing causation. Once they “transcend,” why be surprised of the blasting away of any archeological record? After all, a record is not a thing-in-itself.
.
THE NON-REDUCTIVENESS OF THINGS: Somehow, depending on one’s perspective, context, and purpose, an Ephemeral Essence presents to apprehensions — as having properties, faces, and masks for appearing to be: Expanding or collapsing, rolling out or in, stretching or compressing, blinking ir or out, projecting or drawing, pushing or pulling, attracting or repulsing, changing or catalyzing, transforming or conserving, escaping or synchronizing, creating or annihilating, iterating or absorbing, spinning or orbiting, breaking or fluxing, dividing or reconciling, counting or scaling, vibrating or vanishing, mapping or modeling, apprehending or appreciating, valuing or pricing, explaining or unifying.
.
Only in respect of such presentations of properties is one is availed significations that can be scaled and measured, until such scalings result in transformations or phase shifts, which then can only be reasonably related along different, not necessarily coordinate, scales. The more precisely detailed one pursues to make one’s measure, the more the limits of one’s standard recede into fuzzy uncertainty, the more craftily the Ephemeral Essence facilitates alternative standards for measuring presentations. And so on. Thus, our sensations for experiencing and measuring manipulations of presentations is discretely finite, continuously unbounded, and not unitarily reductionist.
.
Under all such faces and masks, that which itself is fluxing and presenting significations to our apprehensions remains of the same essence, but is identifiable in its fluxing sameness only in qualitative respect, not quantitative. The operations by which we measure to stretch, compress, divide, glue, change, charge, polarize, spin, vibrate, transform, represent, etc., are performed in respect of how significations present to our conscious apprehension. That is, we differentially measure significations and signs of an Ephemeral Essence, which in itself we cannot measure, but only experience, armed only with our consciousness of identity, sensation, intuition, and empathy. We apprehend the Essence’s significations, we know our consciousness, we intuit ongoing participation, and, in respect thereof, we derive our moral purposefulness as we pursue our meaningful fulfillment.
.
CORRELATION --- Crossing the Fog:
Of the foggy apprehension of possibilities and the conscious appreciation of manifestations:  All other factors remaining proportionately equal, consider single-dimensional analysis of such “all other factors.” Ask: In what respect may such a mental project ever reasonably, precisely, or practically be undertaken? Suppose a person were — in any single way or along any single dimension — to alter his relationship with his contextual frame of reference (or space-time orientation), as by: altering his (or his avatar's, or his proxy's, or his thing-being-tested's) relative proximity, direction, speed, acceleration, angular momentum, orbital radius, vibration, focus of attention, screening of noise, or language or logarithm of deciphering. With each alteration of his point of view, would not his entire frame of reference also be affected? Still, he may find it practical, for many tinkering pursuits, to assume that all factors apart from his own orientation remain proportionately constant or continuous. However, such would not be the case. His change in point of view would affect his entire frame of reference, however subtly. The greater the individual change, the greater the multi-dimensional flux in his frame of reference. Eventually, the noise and fuzz of the multi-dimensional flux will overpower his capacity to maintain a sequentially proportional or logarithmic correlation between his perspective and his context. He will find himself in a paradoxical or foggy land of infinite possibilities of quantum fuzz or cognitive dissonance.

He may relieve such fog and fuzz either by reducing or increasing the direction or rate of his alteration from the original state with which the sustenance of his identity has bonded. However, he will not be able to disperse or clear the fog that separates the multi-dimensional transition. Nor will he be able to ensure the eternal life or body of his physical avatar. Death (identity transcendence) is his ultimate fog of transition. No single-dimensional-based technology will enable him to preserve a clearly proportional or logarithmic correlation across all alterations in his path between all perspectives and contexts. He will not be able to explicate, predict, or control the physical expression of the world in respect of any grand, reconciling, precisely-measuring model, map, or theory. Not in any single dimension of space, space-time, gravity, mass, direction, angular momentum, evolution from chaos, recordation of memory, entanglement of information, presetting of dominoes, competition among free beings, nor bonding to avatar. Rather, the transitioning and unfolding of that which presents from the communication and functioning that is signified across multiple dimensions is byproduct of a meta dance of feedback (of unfolding apprehension and appreciation) ... between an holistic source of conscious will and its variously particular perspectives.  Moreover, every perspective of consciousness participates in the feedback dance of apprehension and appreciation, in respect of which is signified all that is made manifest.
Respect for that is the basis for meaning, purposeful tinkering, empathy, and civilized morality. God presently feeds back, in respect of such significations as God presently has apprehensions of and appreciations for.