Dance of Feedback

DANCE OF FEEDBACK BETWEEN PERSPECTIVES OF THE WHOLE AND OF THE PARTS:Formulas that avail the unfolding of measurable signification, by thus, perhaps also avail the qualitative apprehension of perspectives of consciousness.Thus, the unfoldment is in respect of a perpetual, present, qualitative apprehension of quantitatives.If there were only quantitative, with no dance with qualitatives, then there would be an uncommunicated, predetermined unfoldment, of no meaningful existentiality. Thus, quantitatives avail limits for each next unfoldment, while apprehensions of qualitatitives feed back, to participate in choice making.Thus, limits of quantitatives and participations of qualitatives are reconciled.Thus, there is neither free will, nor predetermination.Rather, there abides a“dance” of contemporaneous participation in respect of a reconciling holism.

EXPERIENTIAL PRESERVATION:By what Mechanism or Field, if any, may Information about previous vibrations be recorded, preserved, accumulated, spread out, remembered, forgotten, or recycled into the Perpetual Present?It does not seem that a Source Unit would“flux” in any meaningful way, without simultaneously availing Signifying expression of a Field of numerous, vibrational, Vector Values, i.e., Locally Relational Vibrational Vector Units. Is a Meta Aspect of Field necessarily associated with a Meta UNIT of Form?May such Field mediate and accumulate Vibrations, as Iterations of a Combinatory Singularity?Does some Substratum of Math avail such Field, and Vibrations within it, to be Aspects of a Singularity, without de-unitizing the Singularity?Is THE UNITY, in aspects, like a TRINITY, being expressive of (1) Unit of Form (God Perspective?), (2) Unit of Field (Holy Ghost Context?), and (3) Unit of Iterations of Vibrations (Jesus Purposefulness?)?Are the vibrations Continuously Degreed across one dimension, while being Discretely separate and Digitally Leaping across another?Depending on point of view, context, and purpose, may aspects of the Trinity be reasonably intuited to be both meta-qualitative and significatorily-quantitative?When quantitative, may Information be subject to limiting Conservation, to be Recycling between manifestiality and potentiality?May previous preservations of Information about Vibrations of the Source Unit, by being preserved as Information in the Field, necessarily and continuously take on changing and Recycling Qualities (or Personalities) for availing changing dimensional representations?

CAN GOD FORGET:May quantitative information in the Manifest be converted and stored as qualitative information in the Potential?Perhaps, in that way, God can in the temporal “remember” all the information that is manifest, and “forget” all the information that is potential.

WAY STATION: Without present consciousness, there is no meaningful world of manifestation.That which is recorded into present manifestation, with no experiential consciousness, seems like a WAY STATION, for transitioning in the flux of feedback between a world of present manifest consciousness and a world of apprehension of potential unfolding.

THE CLOUD:May the next intermediate formula be beyond our easy senses, but not beyond our eventual empiricism, via an organization of Baconian Organon into “The Cloud?”May The Cloud divine means, itself, to birth and express New Perspectives, for expressing, measuring and experiencing new derivatives of qualities and colors, and reporting back?May it find and organize with Other Clouds, via projective polarities?Is there a Meta Cloud that abides over all, beyond and higher?A Cloud of Clouds of Clouds?Like Choirs of Angels, Substrata of Substrata, Organizations of Organizations, Formulas of Formulas?

INNATE EMPATHY: Vibrating projections of Iterations are subject to organizing with sub-formulas, for Organizing and Conserving their projections.Thus, vibrating projections carry innate capacity to be organized, to seek and feel their associates.Thus, a Quality of vibrational pressure is derivative of organizations of innate empathies and appreciations.Thus, Organization of small vibrations of innate empathy leads to feelings of qualities and perceptions regarding the organizations-- i.e.,, causal forms of pressure, representation, sensation, light, differentiation, perspectives, apprehension, ART.

RELATIONSHIPS WITH COSMIC EMPATHY:A main issue would seem to pertain to relationships with Cosmic Empathy.What cosmos of relationships would an interested, apprehensive, Reconciler of consciousness seek to coax into manifestation?In reconciling empathies, how would a Reconciling Agency factor local expressions of competition and cooperation? Note that both competition and cooperation would be aspects of empathy, i.e., of perspectivistic organization and iteration of intuitive caring between Cosmic Empathy and local Perspectives.

FEEDBACK OF MIND: Mind may be conceptualized as a correlative coordinator of experience.Mathematical truths limit parameters within which sub-organizations for perspectives of mindful Will can evolve. Constant mathematical relationships among sub-significations of physical forms are a priori functions of Truth, which often waits to present on mindful formulations. The Logic of Will (of desire) is constrained by the Math law of Conservation, which reconciles among the many, to the one unfoldment, from among many qualities of perspective. Sensory experience emerges to our conscious apprehension, in association with how our sense detectors present to our organizations of brain.In what respect may mere reason and logic help divine how such relationships and associations came to be, or how they came to experience qualities?


 

SUPERVENIENCE OF NOWNESS

RENORMALIZATION TO PERPETUAL PRESENT --- THE RECONCILED-SYNCHRONIZED-CONSERVED HERE AND NOW:Atomic orbital time seems to provide a reliable standard unit of sequential reference for an inertial frame.And Relativity seems to allow renormalitive calculations across inertial frames. However, there seems not to be a standard, granular unit of time that applies to any measure across the Universe as a whole, by which to measure universal time passed from any reference point of “nowness.”So, what does it mean to suggest the universe, from earth perspective, appears as a whole to be “x” years in age?Would any present perspective from a different part of the universe derive the same x age, given renormalization?What may that mean?

NOWNESS: One may intuit that there seems to abide a cosmic NOWNESS.And, given accurate renormalization, it seems every perspective would measure the universe to be of the same age since the “Big Bang.”
 
SPACE-TIME CONTINUITY V. MATTER-ENERGY GRANULARITY:May it be best to consider severable “things” that are relationally measurable in space-time as being granular, while “space-time itself” is best considered as being mathematically continuous?Depending on utility of math model being deployed by Will, may space and time be modeled equally well, either as being discrete or as being continuous?When a basic unit is too small to be measured, it may give an impression to a perspective of Conscious Will that it is continuous, because the Perspective is incompetent to perceive the individual steps.For example, if discrete feedback is required to synchronize and reconcile a thing with its context, then the smallest moment of space-time needed to synchronize the feedback may be the level of granularity that is relevant to that relationship for that perspective.

TIME AS ILLUSION, SECONDARY TO SEQUENCES IN MATH-BASED FUNCTIONS, FORMULAS, AND OPERATIONS: Time can be measured to be only as discrete or continuous as the substances and processes used to measure it. What is thus measured is not an objective condition, but our normalized, inter-subjective detection of math-based relations among patterns of change. Zeno’s paradox may be resolved by recognizing that discrete segments and sequences may undergo renormalizing quantum leaps.

ZENO’S PARADOX:It may resolve Zeno’s paradox of the Dichotomy by questioning one of his assumptions:that between any two different points in space (or time), there is always another point. Without this assumption, there are only a finite number of distances between two points, so there is no infinite sequence of movements.Hence, the paradox seems to be resolved.That is, in any given inertial frame, there may be a smallest, discrete unit of space and a smallest discrete unit of time.Getting from any one segment or sequence to another may entail quantum leaps, rather than an infinite series of steps by halving.

What may be implied about the reality of space, time, matter, energy, and conscious perspective, if separations in space and time are reasonably to be conceptualized as Discrete, rather than Continuous?Then, it would seem that the ultimate building blocks of empirically measurable substance (matter and energy situated in relative space-time) would consist of units (or "points"), which in themselves were immeasurable, i.e., sizeless and without mass, but which, in fields of formulaic organization, would avail expression of contextually relative and measurable size, curvature, mass, location, direction, speed, i.e., vectors subject to conservational formulas.

SUPERVENIENCE AMONG LEVELS OF STRUCTURE AND IN HIERARCHY OF FORMULIZATIONS:A concept of Supervenience suggests that each change in state at a higher level of structure or formulization must correspond to a change in lower level states. Supervenience would assert that a lower-level process uniquely determines the higher-level process.Thus there abides a “many-to-one mapping” between lower-level processes and higher-level processes. It seems that a discrete structure may supervene upon a continuous substratum, and, vice versa, a continuous structure may supervene upon a discrete substratum.

SUSSING THE IMMEASURABLE REAL:The Singular Unit-Packet seems to be necessarily existent, i.e., “real.”Yet, in itself, it is meta, i.e., not measurable.Yet, as applied with formulas, it produces derivative appearances, which are in some ways, measurable.They are not "completely measurable" in themselves, for they do not exist in themselves, but only relationally -- to a perspective, subject to a relational context, for some purpose of being formed to a record or sensation.Thus, appearances are relationally measurable, for qualitative purposes, not for a purpose of permanent recordation of truth about reality.
They are measurable in respect of formulas under a calculus which can be contrived to whatever the level of accuracy as may be desired, so long as the quality being thus quantified does not transpose across a fuzzy state of becoming, to phase shift to a nonlinearly different quality.May its interface be “sussed”?CONCEPTUALIZING TO PRACTICAL PURPOSES: In respect of what conceptual scheme may one best and most consistently map measurable reality, while inspiring or identifying that which constitutes moral and meaningful conduct?
MATHEMATICAL THINGS:
- The Singular Unit -- A conception of a Form (geometrical math)
- Vibrations -- Iterative formulations that are digitally representable in mathematics
- Field -- Conserving mediator of mathematical relationships and transitional interfaces

MATHEMATICAL ONTOLOGY- Regarding the ontology of mathematical physics:If the physical world objectively possesses a mathematical structure, then may it follow that it also possesses a substructure of that structure?Are there “mathematical things”?

MAPPING – SUPERVENIENCE -- NEWTONIAN GRID -- COORDINATE AND COEXTENSIVE MAPPING V. QUANTUM LEAPS AND RELATIVISTIC PHASE TRANSFORMATIONS:

A locally shared sub-formula may avail appearances of aspects of shared grid mapping. The appearance of sharing may be conservable in respect of an intermediate, sub-summing formula, such that all locally relativistic transformations are shared at a same rate, such that all so sharing would seem to retain the same grid reference for digitized measurements. A need may not arise for re-normalizing or adjusting comparisions between local and distant frames of reference, except as connective formulas may traverse between a local sub-formula and a distant application of an intermediate formula or shift in inertial frame.

THE SINGULAR UNIT-PACKET:A singular Unit, whose Identity is ITERATED numerously among indiscernibles, is perpetually availed to the functioning of every presently fluxing sub-formula.

Its Number of Vibrational Iterations is limited only by the number of its applications to sub-formulas. The number of such sub-formula applications is limited only by the Top Formula. All sub-formulas are subsumed under the Top Formula. As a conserving equation, the Top Formula has Two Sides. Does that implicate that it is digitally based?

UNIFICATION TO ONE:May Reconciling Stuff consist of a Singular Digit, Value, or Unit, which itself is immeasurable in size or mass, which has no size or mass, which in essential Identity is of the Number One, which is iterated for whatever number of applications may be apt, for application by all sub-formulas of the Top Formula?

Do Iterations of bubbles and vibrations of the Singular Unit not, upon their application, measure to ANNIHILATE or cancel one another, because they do not exist as measurable things?

Does the Quality of their application with sub-formulas avail Emergence of in-form-ation of plural fields, of organizations and vector orientations, the interfunctionings of which avail the recordation, experience, interpretation, and communication of such information?Do such Emergent fields and vector values (in respect of emergent qualities of revolution, rotation, roll, and spin) (linear direction and angular momentum) come to avail expression of Charges (positive and negative), gravity (mass), attraction, repulsion, bindingness, cancellation (annihilation of organizations), and quantum leaps (digitized correlations and polarized movements)?

Thus, do such Units, if they exist in themselves, not interact, because they are of One? Does the Singularity not interact with itself?However, do Vibrational Iterations of the Source Singular Unit, in respect and relation to sub-formulas that are organized in respect of such iterations, interfunction and interact? Do interactions of Organizations of iterations of in-FORM-ation avail all dimensional qualities of relative and relational formulization and measure --- such as exclusivity (spin), mass (rate of responsiveness to gravitational curvature), location (space), orientation (linear and angular momentum), vector (matter), polarity, charge, radiation, amplitude, intensity, reactivity, wavelength, wave frequency (energy), and comparative sequential compression (time)?

Do special, shared, and intermediate levels of Form-ulas avail shared cosmic cones of relationally balanced experience?

If there abides a "set number" of vibrational iterations of the Singular Unit, in respect of the shared cone of cosmic experience that is availed to us, then it would be in respect of the number of applications of the Singular Unit that are availed to all the sub-formulas that produce the appearance of our shared cone of experience.

The relational fluxing of the sub-formulas is guided and reconciled in respect of an innate capacity of digitally appreciative feedback between the Source of the Top Formula and the perspectives availed among the sub-formulas.

Thus, each iteration of the Unit is Innately Relational to all others, and all seem to be subject to a digitizing heirarchy of fluxing formulas, under a Top Formula Algorithm.

The function of the sub-formulas is to avail appearances … of measurable discretes and continuosities among appearances of relational and fluxing organizations.

QUESTION: May the Top Formula support a Character, either of superior consciousness or of primitive apprehension? For what Purpose may it Conserve or Guide? How does it receive and process Feedback from sub-formulas, without itself being changed? Does it change or learn? Does it have a channel for instantaneous feedback?
SUPERVENIENCE OF UNCHANGING CHANGER:May there be an Unchanging Changer? An Unchanging Top of the System of Heirarchical Formulas? May it have meta capacity to flux sub-formulas on each side of its equal sign, without the top-formula itself needing to be fluxed, in order to flux them?

EMBODIMENTS OF FORMULAS:Iterations of the Meta cannot, as themselves, not even in aggregate, be directly measured or weighed. Rather, such weights, charges, and masses of which they avail signification are all derivative of how their iterations are formula-ized, and therewith avail Emergence to significations of quanta, with qualities, some of which are sensed and some of which are measured.

HOW THE META AVAILS INSTANTANEOUS EXPRESSION TO THE QUALITIES AND QUANTITIES OF THE MORTALLY EXPERIENCEABLE:

When a measurable relationship dissipates or "winks out" into apparent immeasurable nothingness, the relationship simply recurs elsewhere, sort of like through a wormhole, but still subject to the System of Algorithmic Formulas.The Singular-Meta-Field-Unit may be modeled as being presently everywhere, to instantaneously blow and suck bubble-packets and vibrations along a circular loop, to recycle organizations of Sub-Perspectives of Will between the Potential and the Manifest.It is omnipresent to the manifest, omni-imaginative to the potential, and omnipotent to the possible, for such sequential exchanges among quantifiable segments as are possible within such formulas as it adopts.It is omnivorous of perspectives of experience.Its moral pursuits are based in feedback of empathy and evolution.

The potential of Iterations of the Source Unit to influence and effect measurable relationships is guided and constrained to a System Algorithm that is presented with the Source Unit.

AT WHAT LEVEL OF SUPERVENIENCE OR DERIVATION DO ITERATIONS OF THE SOURCE UNIT EXIST?ARE THEY IMMEASURABLE, EXCEPT IN RESPECT OF INTERFACE WITH THEIR EMBODIMENT OF FORMULAIC INTERFUNCTIONINGS?
There seems little point to imagining all the Iterations of Units, in themselves, being collapsed into a small space, or even into a Singular Unit or Black Hole.

Regardless of proportionality in any collapse, the units being, in themselves, sizeless and massless, would not be meaningfully measured or conceptualized to have collapsed.

What is meaningful is only how they are relatively (and digitally?) deployed, supervened under the System Algorithm (Top Formula), for giving expression to sub-algorithms.Under such formulaic deployment, expression is given to exclusivity, vibration, frequency, reinforcement, interference, entanglement, alignment, directional vector, angular momentum, spin, charge, neutralization, and annihilation.It is not the meta-vibrations of iterations that are signified, but the INTERFACE effect of such vibrations taking on the signification to give expression to formulas.

In themselves, the iterations of units would not collapse into a Single Unit, unless all Perspectives of Consciousness were also collapsed into a Single Perspective. Were a single unit (as quick as math) the SAME UNIT, as a Single Identity of Indiscernibles, it could apply itself, digitally, to function as a placeholder, to flesh out (word made flesh) all apparent substance, so as to make relational formulations and organizations mathematically measurable in severalty, subject to perspective, context, and purpose.Each iteration of perspective would be dormant, while its formulative definition were unfilled, during which sequencing break it would be without capacity to notice that its experience of apparent continuity was really based in digitality.

CRACKED SYMMETRY – RELATIVISTIC SIGNIFICATION – FORMULIZATION REQUIRES SEPARATION OF PRESENTATION OF UNITY (HOLISM) IN COORDINATE ASPECTS (RELATIVISTIC PARTICULARS):If meta (real) units were in themselves aligned in perfect meta symmetry (property-less, sizeless, massless, directionless, chargeless, spinless, and indiscernible), then how, in relativity, could any sensed or recorded SIGNIFICATION or thing be relationally measured to orbit, radiate, emit a charge, traverse a distance, respond to gravity, or be tested to have organized? Such could not occur were such units, in themselves and by themselves, the fill of Reality. Some additional factor or aspect would need to avail such Units to assume such relational organizations, Aspects, and coordinate Properties (cracked symmetry) as would avail interpretations, sensations, and recordations of Information concerning measurable functions (such as relative weight, charge, size, direction, speed, revolution, rotation, and roll. Until some device or Formula were applied to crack symmetry and separate the fundamental Singularity into varying Aspects of presentation, in order to Mediate, Interface, and relate among them, to give expression and signification to a measurable Organization or form of comparable size and mass, then there would be nothing and no basis that could be said to have capacity to measure them or their organization ---such as for weight, charge, size, direction, speed, revolution, rotation, or roll.

RELATIVISTIC CONSTANTS:When one Thing (immeasurable in itself) parcels and presents itself in different Aspects or Phases or Properties, and such aspects are required to relate to one another in ways that obey relativistically constant formulas, then such Aspects may sense and measure their relational contexts by empirical reference to coordinately mapped changes among their contextual constituents. Thus, the Universe may be immeasurable as one substance (no mortal can measure time, space, or matter before the Big Bang), yet, after the Big Bang from Cracked Symmetry, be measurable in respect of the possible mixes of Aspects that it can present.

SYMMETRY:If the only Source Unit were propertyless and sizeless, then summing indiscernible iterations would not add size.Thus, it would seem meaningless to speculate on any possible effect of any simultaneously proportionate expansion or contraction of all indiscernible iterations of such Unit.So how may any iteration of any such unit be conserved to move, push, pull, attract, repel, organize, or bind in respect of any other? Well, Symmetry would have to be cracked, so that iterations became irregular and discernible.Once symmetry were cracked, so that vibrations and iterations of the Source Unit became discernible, then how may such Iterations of units be formul-ized and imag-ed, to organize and obey conservational relationships representable in formulas, based on values assigned to vectors and fields in math?How may such irregularly iterative representations be formalized to convey locally perspectivistic information,that could be interpreted to Wilful and sensory experiences of pressure, picture, color, vibration, and chemical flavor?

PARTICULAR SUBDIVISION NECESSITATES DISCERNIBILITY:Formulas for organizations that can be fluxed to re-pre-sent the conservation and impression of sensate information to our experience and memories must somehow be interfaced, associated, and bonded with Iterations of Aspects of the ultimate Unit of Reality.What would happen were all irregularity in such vibrational iterations to smooth and dissipate out?Then, it would seem such Iterations would revert to perfect indiscernibility and re-absorption into the Singular Source Unit.

SUPERVENIENCE OF LEVELS OF FORMULAS:So long as vibrational iterations retain aspects of discernibility, then they may be subject to complex re-organizations in respect of their properties of differentiation.What would avail them to represent qualities of measurably discernible difference would abide with the organization of such units in respect of locally relative frames of reference.Thus, the Source Unit would avail such organizations to be fluxed in obedience to predetermined and contemporaneously determined hierarchies or systems of formulas.Such formulas must entail means for representing and conveying expression of relationally discernible, vibrationally imperfect, iterations of the Source Unit.Otherwise, such units would remain without meaningful or measurable existentiality. Expression via such formulas must entail means of inform-ational recordation and apprehension among such various relativistic and reconciled perspectives as are locally coterminous with our shared state of affairs.

FORMULAS AT INCEPTION OF DISCERNIBILITY: Thus, the formulas and the aspects of vibrational iterations emerge into contemporaneous existentiality, secondary to cracked symmetry.But for their contextually conservational relation, the formulas and the units of imperfect iterations which they rule, would neither of them have size, mass, charge, direction, or purpose.Yet, taken together, their interfunctioning communicates informational expressions of mass. Thus, vibrationally imperfect iterations of the Source Unit associate with the inception of fundamental aspects, i.e., derivative units that are associated with dynamic formulas for defining organizations, translations, and measurables.

DIGITAL DISCRETES:Each alteration on one side of a formula entails a simultaneous, conservational, dualistic, quantum jump (exchange) on the other side of that level of formula. Thus, vectors of revolutions, rotations, and rolls appear to be derivative of discrete quantum leaps, which are controlled by whatever the Reconciling Source that actuates and guides parameters for the unfoldments that are made subject to such system of conserving formulas.Thus, information appears to be exchanged in discrete bits, in a way that correlates and renormalizes so as to sponsor locally qualitative expectations and interpretations of unfolding continuosities in space and time.

 

OF WILL, PURPOSE, MORALITY, AND RECONCILIATION

OF WILL, PURPOSE, MORALITY, AND RECONCILIATION:

WHAT ABIDES AS INNATE TO EXISTENTIALITY: WILL is innate, as are perspectives of will, as is meta empathy among such perspectives of will as are in inherent competition and cooperation, to surpass along the unfoldment of evolution. A reasoned idea of moral empathy needs to factor the innate need of perspectives of will to pursue and communicate surpassing unfoldments of evolution. Because surpassage is part of our inherent condition of beingness, there is no set, linear end, final objective for any formulation of moral purposefulness. The teleology appears to be for perpetual seeking, not for end times finding.

UNFOLDING EXPRESSIONS OF MORAL CHOICES: Each adoption of an avatar or perspective of will rationalizes and feeds back, through its centrally organized processing unit (cpu), i.e., brain. The Field wills an organized, focused action by an organism, whose brain then coordinates an organized rationalization, as if the brain had been first to intend an action of signification, rather than the Field having intended the brain. Morality has to reconcile with the unfolding evolution of expressions of competing and cooperating perspectives of will. Morality reconciles unfoldments of ego, empathy, and evolution. The Rule of Morality: The principle that should be a categorical imperative, a moral law of all signification, is a qualitatively subjective one: Be Empathetic!

INNATE MORALITY: Morality is as categorically innate and unavoidable as God. We propose and make temporal judgments and feedback. We care, even as we kill. Manmade laws are only temporal aids to practice, as crutches and helpmates along the path of our beingness. By our apprehensions and actions, we "vote," as we deem that which is Good v. Evil. Our votes are factored, hence, our evaluations color the qualitatives of reality. In that relation, good and evil are derivatively real. God reconciles. I would differ from Kant, in that I see necessary evolution as not being categorically or necessarily moral. To say what seems to be fair now is often to fail to weigh or speculate what may be fair were alternatives to come to pass, upon a sacrifice of the now.

INNATE INCOMPLETENESS OF RATIONALIZATIONS OF SETTINGS: Set theory can never be complete in accounting for all phenomena, because each newly organized signification that encompasses a set must simultaneously give expression to the organization as a whole, therewith rendering the whole as something greater than the sum of its parts. That is the way and will of the world. The Field that wills to present an organization, as an organization, simultaneously harbors the will to manifest, represent, and record information for potentializing the qualitative interpretation of expressionism that will unfold in respect of the organization.

UNFOLDING ADEQUACY: Will is always adequate to the qualitative expression of each new organization because no new organization can emerge without the merging bond of will, whether as perspective or as potentializing potentate.

INCOMPLETENESS OF NON-TRIVIAL TRUTHS: The truth availed to mortals seems to be uncertain incompleteness about whether a truth about the original, perpetual, permanent, existential emergence of consciousness may be available to any consciousness, much less to mortal or human consciousness.

MEANING OF WILL: Will, as iterative of tendencies from vibrations and observers. Will, as innate capacity to appreciate. Will, as innate drive to focus, adopt, identify, appreciate, and change.

BIRTH: Original sin -- limitation that necessarily accompanies the adoption of an identity of self, i.e., a perspective of will. Without such "sin," we would have no severable perspective of being. Without such "sin," God would lack our feedback and company. LIFE: Dignity and morality -- moral beings as ends, worthy of empathy, not merely means! Strive to be worthy of beingness. DEATH: Salvation-- sublimation and reasbsorption of particular perspectives of will, in preparation for potential recycling or reincarnation.

WILL TO POWER tends to be redundant of will, which, by definition, seeks power, either for a perspective which it has adopted for experiencing consciousness of itself, or for a perspective, organism, or organization to whose purpose it seeks to devote and sacrifice itself. Will wants to pursue a receding idealization, not to capture a final, end-of-times stagnation. Cosmic possibilities for qualities, quantities, and combinations of meta digitized vibrations of will are INFINITE, such that the cosmos seems to be as beyond rationalizable repetition as are patterns of numbers in the calculation of pi. May the COSMIC MIND have capacity to delete memories and information, without necessarily having eternally to repeat patterns for their expression?

NO MATTER, NEVER MIND: Meta vibrations of will produce holons and organizations encompassing parts. An organism may organize interpretations of Phenomena of sensations, derivative of relations among relations, among representations of representations. Thus, Iterations of will bind with that which avails the manifestation of organizations of parts, interfunctioning with organizations of parts. Thus, there abides a Quality with which an Organization potentializes more than a mere Summation of its Parts, with ever emerging traces of significations of Will, as Will perpetually merges and emerges, in its particularized and quanticized severances of expressionism.
Thus, the organization of a system adds a Quality to the Quantitative Sum of the parts to its set. Thus, Infinity is charged with potential for relationships to be experienced among charges and perspectives of Will.

CLUMPING

CLUMPING: As vibrations of Will clump and focusPerspectives, the potential for relations between and among such vibrations and perspectives charges a field of space-time, that is Derivatively Expressed all around and in respect of them.

NO VACUUM: Thus, the field, derivative and in respect of vibrations and perspectives, is not really a vacuum. Rather, it is charged in potentiality. However, it is charged so minutely as to be Beyond Individual Measure of such charges.

Thus, POTENTIALITY would CHARGE the field, the vibrating clumpings, and the singular unit, such that iterations upon iterations would generally be repulsed and attracted, outbound from the Singular Unit. The Unit and its Field would seem to have no particular locus in space-time, for space-time may not even exist, except in relational respect of the Singular Unit and its Field.

NO PRIVILEGED UP OR DOWN: Thus, no particular Iteration would be privileged to know which way was up or down, expanding or contracting. What would seem to be apparent to and from any particular Iteration would be that particulars away from it would seem to be relatively accelerating in distance. However, this appearance would be the same, regardless of whether all matter were accelerating outbound while proportionately expanding, or whether all matter were accelerating inbound while proportionately contracting. Either way, at some point along the acceleration, an iteration would seem either to dissipate or to contract, to such a phase-shifting point as no longer to support a perspective of consciousness in respect of it that could be apart from that of the Singular Unit.

ROTATION AS REFERENTIAL BASIS FOR GRIDDING: However, if a Point of Origination for a Universal Bubble is assumed, then it would seem odd if all that seems relationally to be further outbound were sensed as rotating clockwise, while all that seemed further inbound were sensed as rotating counterclockwise. Would such be internally consistent with a generally outbound expansion from a common point of origin? No. The increasing acceleration could still be attributed either to increased outbound acceleration or increased inbound contraction. So then, could such odd observation of rotational tendencies, in connection with differentials in red shifts in electromagnetic radiation, provide a referential basis for gridding one's relative locus in respect of a presumed common point of origin? No. The shift would be to the red, either way, and the CAUSE of the differential could still not be known to be because of acceleration outbound or inbound, assuming compensatory proportionate expansion or contraction among all forms of mathematical expression.

SIZE IN ITSELF: In itself, as a whole, the Singular Unit and its Field and collection of clumps of dissipating and replacing Vibrations, is SIZELESS. In relationships among the Unit, Field, and iterations of Vibrations, interfunctionings are measurable. However, such measures cannot be Mathematically pinned to a Grid in respect of an unchanging or Favored Point in Space-Time.
 

TRIVIAL TRUTHS AND NON-TRIVIAL CATEGORIES OF KNOWABLES AND UNKNOWABLES

TRIVIAL TRUTHS: Many truths are merely tautologies, truisms, made true by triviality of definition or direct intuition. Such as truths in mathematics. Some trivial truths: A is A; definition is definition; identity is identity; present is present; one is one; two plus two is four; will is will; consciousness is consciousness; relationship is relationship; vibration is vibration; formation is formation; information is information; potentiality is potentiality; conservation is conservation; feedback is feedback; phase shift is phase shift; transition is transition; reconciliation is reconciliation; cycle is cycle; system is system; being is being.

RUMSFIELD UNLEASHED --- TEN CATEGORIES OF KNOWABLES AND UNKNOWABLES:

KKK – Knowables which we do not presently know, but which we presently know to be knowables.

KUU -- Knowable Unknown Unknowables -- which we do not presently know to be knowable, but know that we can learn whether they are unknowable, and which happen to be unknowable.

UUU -- Unknowable Unknown Unknowables -- which we cannot know, but may eventually happen to learn that we cannot know them.
U-U-U -- Unknowable Unknowable Unknowns -- which we cannot know, and which we cannot know that we cannot know them.
U-U -- Unknown Unknowables -- which we cannot know, but do not yet know that we cannot know them.
KK -- Known Knowns -- which we presently know, but may forget.
KUK -- Knowable Unknown Knowables -- which we do not presently know to be knowable, but can learn that they are knowable.
KKU -- Knowable Knowable Unknowns -- which we do not know, but know that we can learn whether they are knowable, and which happen to be unknowable.
UKK --Unavoidably Known Knowables -- which we knew from inception of consciousness, and cannot forget so long as we retain consciousness.

UKU – Unknown Knowable Unknowables – which we do not know, and may learn to be unknowable.
 

MODELING AND TESTING

LEVELS OF ORGANIZATION OF WILL THAT HAS ADAPTED MODELING TO CONSCIOUS PURPOSEFULNESS:

1) Unconsciousness of unconsciousness of consciousness of modeling (most plants)2) Unconsciousness of consciousness of modeling (meat eating plants and dreaming animals)
3) Consciousness of modeling (animals' consciousness of surroundings)
4) Consciousness of consciousness of modeling (animal's consciousness of self)
5) Consciousness of consciousness of consciousness of modeling (animal's consciousness of other selves)
6) Enlightened Consciousness of modeling (consciousness of potential)
7) Holistic Reconciling Consciousness of modeling (consciousness of God)

ABSTRACT MODELING: A model/concept of unit/vibration/field can be considered from a standpoint that offers a meta basis for interrelationally considering measurable Substance, recordable Information, and/or presently experienceable Conscious Will. An abstract model is not an explanation of truth, but a model for a way of PURSUING TRUTH. A best model is hoped to be as least-metaphysically postulative and as most-internally consistent as possible. A best model would synthesize other models, with no cost to their rigor, and lead to potential insights for hypothecating submodels of practical application, testability, and falsifiability. A model that guides mores, even in respect of surpassage of evolution. A main moral is: Ego, evolve with empathy! A best model would pierce conceits of naming biological units as if they have eternally separate identities (or souls of consciousness). A best model would pierce notions of separate soul, original sin, and separate eternal salvation.

FALSIFYING MODELS AND PRACTICAL MODELS: A problem with falsifiability as a test is: we already intuit that any model that would purport to be a precise and complete map of non-trivial truth would necessarily be false, per Godel. And, a model may be incomplete or impractical for some purposes, yet highly practical for others. For most earthbound technologies, Newtonian concepts about physics work quite well. A non-trivial idea, concept, model, or formula that cannot be true unless it can be falsified (made false) could never be true for all practical purposes.

MISCELLANEOUS:

PRAGMATIC TEST --- A pragmatic test for a philosophy: What would be the results of an actual practice of the philosophy, with regard to practical issues and interests of a culture or humanity?

DIGITALITY allows the whole to receive severable impressions and variously reconciled conceptualizations.

SHARED CONE: The same information, design, or piece of art is presented, sensed, conceptualized and related differently to every perspective within a shared conceptual cone. Yet, they all share the same holism of Identity, albeit, from different creative perspectives.

SHARED POWER: None of the particular perspectives of consciousness has power in itself to effect a meta choice that woujld limit the whole, except as creatively and self fulfillingly made and reconciled by and to the Holism.

INFINITE QUALITATIVE POTENTIAL: Each different perspective or standpoint within the whole yields a potentially infinite variability of impressions to be fed back to the whole.

CONSCIOUSNESS: Consciousness is information representing and experiencing itself, as if in a stream of digitized feedback of constant ebb and flow, exchanging, communicating, substituting, and dimensionally analyzing.

Light Conveyed Information

How light carries data: Each photon/wave does not itself carry a picture. Rather, the vibration/wave length of each one is altered by the context and color of the substance it is reflected from. When it reaches your eyes, each such photon is carrying the altered wave length. Your retina receives the altered wave length as conveyed by each photon that hits it, and then your brain interprets the combined data as a picture. The process of visual transmission, perception, sensation, and conceptualization of Information thus depends on the capacity of each electromagnetic wavelength to be altered based on the substance it reflects from and then the retina/brain being able to receive such wavelength and interpret the combined data that is conveyed by others as a picture representation. As the photon is received by your retina, it will impart information about its incoming wave length to nerve receptors, and as the photon is reflected back from your retina its outgoing wavelength will again be altered by the context of the substance of your retina. The originating wavelength of each photon/wave will be based on the context of that from which it originated. Its wavelength thereafter will be affected and altered based on the context of that of whatever it may subsequently be reflected by.

Consider:  Seeing your reflection in someone else's iris.  Seeing regressive pictures of yourself by positioning yourself between two or more mirrors.  How mood changes may indirectly affect the apparent color of eyes.  http://www.ehow.com/how-does_4967659_can-eye-color-change-mood.html
 

Digitality:  Encoding Information/Transmission/Reception/Re-encoding/Re-transmission/Re-reception/re-encoding; etc.  Send/Receive/Send/Receive.  Feedback.

Light photons travel at the limiting maximum speed of any outbound vibration/wave/radiation. Light is subject to being reflected or absorbed. If absorbed, it transitions into a qualitatively different kind of clump or organization, which will heat, excite, bind, and alter the properties of such organization and its components.

When light records information about a substance it reflects from by altering the light photon's wavelength, and when such informtation is conveyed to a retina, and when the photon is then reflected from the retina, then the only preservation of the information first recorded by the photon will have been imparted to a nerve in the retina, whereupon such information may be combined to be interpreted as a picture, and somehow stored as an experiential memory.

QUESTION: So, does the unfolding transmission of Information present a continuous process of receiving, losing, and remixing Information? Is all Information preserved in some format, or is Information constantly churned, lost, and recreated?