The Dollar:
To save the dollar, the regime would need to wish for America's recovery. But what if it does not? I don't mean just the regime of Obama's elites. I mean also the regime of the mega elites who run Obama's elites. Is it ever safe to increase the power of the present regime? Your plan would help, were our leaders actually Americans -- in body and mind. But the writing has been on the wall for a long time that the American idea has been abandoned by the kind of leaders we persist in electing, progressively. Our checks and balances are about to fall. We need a movement to reverse a long term, evil trend, but I despair whether that can be done peaceably. Still, we must try. We desperately need a re-awakening.
The dollar has become just a symbol for the value we place in being governed by an elite that controls all our chokepoints, including: the printing of money, the setting of interest rates, the extent of governmental indebtedness, the budget for legislative enactments, the projection of apologists for elitist rule, the scientists who are dependent on government grants, the politicians who are dependent on corporate contributions, the corporations that are dependent on government kickbacks, the media for mesmerizing public acquiescence, and the academe for inculcating faith and trust in the regime of elitists. Elitists print the dollar, create its value, and spread its influence. Eventually, the dollar, or something very like it, may become a computer-stored measure of the fluxing value that is impersonally placed on each and every non-elite person.
So, insofar as society everywhere is becoming more and more collectivized, with elites to rule the collective, must not whatever replaces the dollar be something very much like the dollar? Will the dollar come to differ only in the nature of the international, elitist regime that sponsors something much like it? Will that regime become a dominating alliance of nations, or a dominating alliance of elitist corporatists? Or an impersonal power monger, like Big Brother? Will elitists gamble with chips for face time with an impersonal power structure, while proles trade in globe-dollars?
From A.T. -- @Ruler4you asked, " Can we survive as a nation is the question?" Bingo! Alternatively stated: Must every nation that values individual freedom and dignity perish?
From A.T. -- @Dougral said, "I hate to say it but America's last chance to be a financially viable nation may not outlast this president." Well, that is the plan of the mega elites who front the elites who rationalize all that is fit for the consumption of the proles. But not even the mega elites will retain much freedom or dignity. They themselves will be reduced to the impersonal power structure of an uncaring, pain inflicting, system of Big Brother, i.e., Progressives' proxy for God. I think the issue to be decided is this: Is impersonal power in its own sake on a par with empathy, or is empathy superior? This will not be decided by logic or science. It will be decided by faith and commitment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
From A.T. -- @oldprogrmr said, "And, when the people see more and more hard evidence that even legitimate State Governments are being crushed by a tyrannical Central Authority, an effective opposition can be mounted from the bottom up with little regard of the elitist, ineffective Federal Congress."
Well, I hope so. I hope we can rally. But what did Orwell see as the rallying force that allowed the power mongers in “1984” to put an end to historical cycles, to install impersonal collectivist solipsism, forever? It was the concentration of mind that comes with horrendous war, violence, and fear. So, can mere empathy and altruism as effectively concentrate the mind for the cause of individual freedom and dignity? Maybe. But not so long as we mock any higher Source of empathy. Not so long as we vent cynicism that the will to represent Empathy is subservient to that will to Power which necessarily corrupts, absolutely. And not so long as we allow inculcation of belief that elites know that which is most politically correct in respect of “science of morals.” The power of freemen is not in their accumulation of wealth, but in their shared respect for a Source of higher justice. When they lose that, they have nothing that can withstand the horde of collectivizing power mongers.
Something (or some aspect) of the animal brain seems to be easily conditioned to find it convenient to ignore feedback, to spread pain, sometimes even to worship pain. Submitting to worship a tyrannical concept of God (or of “the Planet”), one easily comes to believe oneself an authorized agent for imposing tyranny, even unspeakable horror. Pain in others becomes impersonal to sociopaths. Feedback from middling classes is not to be respected. If anything, imposing pain whets sociopaths’ appetites to impose more. Orwell expressed much truth. It seems confusion about the priority of reality – between that which is physical and that which is spiritual -- regiments or contributes to mass sociopathy.
Post a Comment