.
REGARDING SET THEORY: Set theory depends on analysis under a logic based on that which presumes to sum to a mutually exclusive and exhaustive composition. However, there is often a problem with analyis under such logic: While Beingness often appears to be trivalent, set theory operates under an assumption as if beingness were only bivalent. Yet, sets that are not pre-created or artificially preset tend to be trivalent. Trivalent sets are not comprised of parts that are mutually exclusive and exhaustive. Rather, they are comprised of sets that are mutually dependent and transpositional. Depending on perspective, context, and purpose, the face of the whole of a trivalent set vibrates in transpositions among aspects that flux among the Conscious, the Substantive, and the Informational. Such transpositions correlate with, but do not "cause" one another. Their measurable vectors abide as correlates that conserve and balance to zero. As to that which for the present abides in aspect as conscious, substantive, or informational, each of said three aspects defines a different quality, even though each aspect is defined in terms of the other two (as in a game of rock-paper-scissors). No one of said three aspects (qualitative Consciousness, quantitative Substance, and algorithmic Information) in itself defines the holism of the system set, even though each avails meaning to the face of the set.
.
REGARDING MORAL MEANINGFULNESSl To meaningfully appreciate (not prescribe) the set as a fluxing holism, more is needed than a preset-logic of machined-science that is based on a digitized bivalence of true-false, yes-no, on-off, either-or, positive-negative. Rather, a trivalent mode of reasoning is needed, that intuits a pursuit of music and meaningfulness in good faith, and that empathizes in good will --- beyond bivalent logic. A trivalent mode that attaches, identifies with, and is inspired in terms of ... analogical modeling, figures of speech, and sacred parables. Such trivalent reasoning qualitatively factors trivalents, such as: perspective-context-purpose; truth-falsity-contextual dependence; separateness-relation-transposition; representation-observation-interpretive translation; positive-negative-neutral; like-dislike-indifference; vector-catalyst-translator; competition-cooperation-reconciliation; predetermination-random determination-contemporaneous determination; intuition-empathy-measurement.
.
REGARDING TRIVALENCE OF THE CLASS OF ONE: Trivalent reasoning and inspiration among perspectives of consciousness (not machined presets) recognizes not two, but three, aspects of analysis: truth, falsity, and contextually transitional dependence. The Holism (the set of one) fluxes to present trivalent faces, so that no one face of IT is sufficient in itself to define such class of one.
.
1 comment:
An evil has morphed against the decent and productive middle class. It consists with an alignment of a cronydom of perhaps 1/10th of 1 percent (0.001) that uses about 47 percent of the population as simple minded mules, easily run by carrots and sticks. All it needs to tip most votes of significance is another 3 percent. Tipping the scale is simply a matter of: paying deadbeats to vote multiple times, under aliases of cartoon and dead people; laundering bribes willingly paid by international disloyalists to buy politicians; paying "journolists" to helped divert, diversify, divide, confuse, and rule the electorate; consolidating control over all institutions of social significance and persuasion; conditioning the populace the trust those who make fiat money. If this axis that confronts decent human freedom and dignity is not a beast, it would give the Turing test a run for the money.
Post a Comment