.
I suspect that in the beginning there was the eternal chaos of the present, with no beginning and no end. There abided and abides one singular real thing (Nature), i.e., the number one! and one spiritual thing (God), i.e., the potential that necessarily accompanies the number one, for vectoring and representing forms of nothing more than forms, and for balancing, conserving, feeding back, and consciously appreciating fluxing and particular perspectives of such representations.
.
In itself, the chaos (void?) is not of time, space, matter, or energy. Rather, it is the Source of such vectors of time, space, matter, and energy as are appreciated and experienced by Consciousness, with potential to express consciousness of consciousness of oneself (self awareness) and of likely other conscious Identities. (The Chaotic Source, in its balancing and reconciliation, is not precluded from reversing such vectors as avail manifest representations of space, time, matter, and energy by re-diverting anti-vectors with potential to re-balance outward bursts of expressions back to nothingness, i.e., the "number" zero.)
.
The binary (yin-yang) interplay of Nature (the number one) and God (the reconciling conserver of zero), i.e., ones and zeros, constitutes the Active Math that presently and perpetually creates and re-creates all that is signed and signified to fluxing, mortal perspectives of consciousness.
.
Our world has arisen out of the expression of the Active Math of God and Nature. Such Active Math vectored out a direction to our world of space-time and availed means within such world to preserve and record a chronology of unfolding forms being appreciated and guided to evolve within forms. Such records evolved to be preserved in biologically based forms for preserving reactions, habits, instincts, desires, memories, and, eventually, self awareness.
.
Biology has been Guided to avail feedback appreciations of pain and pleasure via neural connected expressions of reproductive organs, hormones, glands, stomachs, and brains. A singular big-bang vector has guided us to an astonishing expression of wondrously varied cosmology and consciousness. All manner of perspectives of consciousness and hormonal-based glands have covered the earth, amenable of amazing feats of competition and cooperation --- generally for avoiding pain (evil?) and finding pleasure (good?). Each gland-based brain is occupied with avoiding pain and finding pleasure. Individual competition and collective cooperation have helped to guide human evolution to a temporal top of the earthly food chain. The technological, measurable "how" of our dominance is empirically discoverable and replicable (to the extent the determining vectors for our temporally shared cosmos remain reliably stable).
.
However, IS THAT ALL THERE IS? Is hormonal avoidance of pain and satiation of pleasure the end-all be-all for being human? Is God's purpose and agenda for reconciling and guiding human expression simply "gay" (to avail the biggest, longest, and best orgasmic experience to the most people, before all die)? Many utopian-minded people, religious and non-religious alike, seem to think so.
.
For spiritually inclined expressions of consciousness, I think, however, there abides with God a singular purpose that is transcendent, beyond mere appeasement of personal pain and pleasure. What else may be written in the logos of measurable matter and in the flesh of the word made qualitative? May (or must?) there abide a universal, connecting morality that transcends human selves, that is higher and more encompassing than personal avoidance of pain and enhancement of pleasure, that apprehends each individual's re-connection with a one-of-a-kind, Individual-Collectivist, Particle-Field, Whole-Part Holon?
.
I suspect many people tend in their interpersonal dealings to try to apprehend whether those with whom they deal may in their insights, intuitions, and empathies apprehend the potential for spiritual transcendence, versus only the temporality of pains and pleasures. This seems often to mark a fluxing boundary between secular-humanist-engineers-of-utopia (including communists, earthly despots, and Rinos and Dinos) versus those who seek companionship among those who want OF THEIR OWN MORAL EXPRESSION OF WILL to "come to Jesus" (Conservers of Liberty).
.
5 comments:
For many people, I suspect the concern is less about fear of self annihilation than about fear of breaking faith with their significant others. Once they feel without significant others, they may feel less compunction about trying to eliminate themselves. Even so, I suspect we are part of an Identity whose self is not eliminated merely by eliminating local material bodies.
Under Active Math, there are fluxing sub equations of sub equations. Powerful Beings may easily seem bonded with, and delegated to oversee, some. That would seem not to be inconsistent with Mormonism. Some people seem to be receivers of uncanny abilities. Maybe they"re somehow tuned to a superior frequency.
Of Iterations, Equalities, Systems, Conservation, and Qualities:
.
All "things" that are manifested to expression are relational translations of forms by Active Math. Each translation is an iterative expression of the unfolding guidance and reconciled purposefulness of Active Math. Each iteration occurs across its own chronological and contextual scaling of vectors that unfold as formulations (platonic geometry) of Active Math. Each iteration is conserved to obey such mathematical vectors as happen to sponsor its signification. "No thing" abides in any perfectly symmetrical aspect, except perhaps as a balance of zero, i.e., as "no-thing-ness." SYMMETRY in a thing that is expressed does not occur except as symmetry that is cracked. That is, it has a center, side, crease, or area that is different or apart from the rest of it, from which the rest of it can be described in mathematical respect. That is not to say that the rest of it is the same as it, but only that the rest of it is "equal" in likeness, in that the rest of it can be described in respect of it. No one thing ever "equals" any other thing in terms of being exactly the same as the other thing, unless the other thing does not exist except as the one thing. To say one thing equals a second thing is only to say that the limited terms by which each thing is described, or for which each thing is used, are the same. Conservation occurs across systems across equal signs. That is not to say that experiences from opposite ends of equal signs must necessarily be interpreted qualitatively in the same way. Indeed, chiral, mirror effects of conserving matter and anti-matter, vectors and anti-vectors, may entail qualitatively disparate experiences.
It's good to warn that tyranny tends to be humanity's condition of default, while the price of liberty seems always to be eternal vigilance. Within this box of Pandora's, however, there is this for hope: that many people hold less fear for the annihilation of themselves than for the breaking of faith with their significant others. Why else would they try to survive even when life is most oppressive? We are part of an Identity whose self is not eliminated merely by eliminating local material bodies, and that Reconciling Identity wills a dignified transcendence. Freedom's admirers are not defenseless, nor without inspiration. The secular god is cardboard; ours is real.
If one were so challenged as to take sacred parables as if they were precise empirical formulizations, that would be "constrained thinking." However, it's no less a matter of constrained thinking to believe that all religious folk are so challenged. When one takes parables as the moral guidance for which they were intended, they are not used as scientific formulas. (That is, if logic really matters to a person.) Consider social "threats." Would they be as in moral threats? If one means "threat" in that sense, show me the "logic" whereby one would derive morality from science. Alternatively, if one does not mean it in a moral sense, but only in the sense of freeing oneself from constraints, one might describe, logically, how it is that everything should be tolerated, or, if not, on what basis one would prescribe lines that society "should" respect and not tolerate erasing. So far, what I see coming from the moral thinking of Progs is mainly all about libertine licensing of every kind of degradation that is conceivable among their favorite fellow travelers. Maybe I'm wrong. If so, set me straight and tell be the logic of Progs' line-drawing basis. So far, I don't quite see how Prog morality is "better" than a healthy respect for the Great Commandment and the Golden Rule, based on the idea of a reconciling Source, i.e., God. What is Progs' reconciling source? Are they just advocating that everything should be tolerated? If so, perhaps they may want to tolerate my inviting some underpass dwellers to help themselves to shares of their property. Sorry, I'm not quite getting Prog moral logic of how it is less threatening to tolerate that moral lines should be drawn by godless Progs, many of whom are simply pleasure-addled, entitlement-mongering dopers or basement dwellers, instead of traditional, god-respecting people. Then again, maybe Progs know a new-Marx, who is not a basement dweller and who can lead us to a new, scientific-based morality. sarc.
Post a Comment