Objective Merit?

The dumasses shall inherit the earth.

As perspectives of consciousness, it is our responsibility, in dynamic feedback with the Godhead, to participate in determining that which should be led to unfold as being worthwhile, meaningful, purposeful, meritorious, deserving, or ... reprehensible. We do that by participating in how our civilizational systems are designed and evolved.

If a group of human beings assimilates that does not want to be reduced to subhuman status, it will foster a system of representative republicanism, wherewith the freedom and dignity of members will be fostered. It will value rights of individuals to freedom of thought, expression, enterprise, and association. But not every group inclines to assimilate such values. Some value their kin, race, culture, country, or sacred or random stories more than the freedom and dignity of all members of their society, nation, or republic.

I do not say that one group is objectively more godly than another. I only say that the society that values human expression cannot long endure by allowing itself to become swamped with individuals that value the supposed security of sub-tribes, homies, contending gangs, races, and divisive cults more than they value human freedom and dignity, generally.

I can think rationally about merit and worth ... in respect of a system or culture that values the freedom and dignity of its members, or even in respect of a system that values slaves, servants, and serfs serving masters. But I cannot think rationally about merit or worth except in respect of some assimilating culture. For a culture that values individual freedom and dignity, I cannot rationalize any merit in deliberately importing liberty-illiterates or persons who value group security and race-based tribalism over a representative republic.

Able bodied people who value group codependence and security (marrying the government that is operated by oligarchs) tend to be of the feminazi. femiman. or saggy-panted persuasion. Often, they are incompetent, and so they parasite on other cultures. They tell themselves they are more caring, fairer, more concerned about "social justice." Yet, their social justice tends to consist in cherry picking stats to "justify" favoring one group over another. This leads to constant, race-baited divisiveness. It makes it easy for oligarchs to divide and rule. To make promises to each and every group, even while knowing such promises can never be reconciled to the whole. Yet, they indoctrinate and convince their dupes, shills, and sub-humanoids to believe big gov will look out for them. This is the same big gov that the oligarchs control, behind their godless smirks.

Before a naïf who can actually think commits to follow such indoctrination, he may do well to consider what is meant by "progressive" slogans about merit, social justice, fairness, tolerance, etc. Who should define our standards for determining just deserts and merit? The self-interested claimant? The merchant who sets prices in response to a fluxing and often contrived marketplace? The fellow members of a family, tribe, race, gang, cult, or voting block of temporal convenience? The louts who need because they laze? Expert philosophers of the metaphysics of conserving goodliness? Mad empiricists bent on designing the best system of biological unfoldment? Neurological scientists with scales for measuring the biggest pleasures and orgasms for the largest number? Comet riders bent on relieving the pain of existence by blowing everyone away in a sudden flash?

I don't know about any objective, ultimate standard of "merit."  Nor do I trust the goodliness or contrivances of people who gang up based on superficialities like race to claim they only want "fairness and equality."  Especially when they seek not to make for themselves, but to strong arm from others. Nor do I trust dupes of oligarchs, who fund gang bangers in their protests. Nor do I trust open-border advocates for cheap-labor farming oligarchs. Nor do I trust tax and banking schemes that perpetuate a vicious cycle of enriching and empowering anti-American, anti-republic, NWO people farmers.

What I do tend to know is when some person or regulation is impeding my freedom of thought, expression, enterprise, or association. And when he or it is working to undermine my republic. I know when ignoranti and corrupti are importing liberty-illiterates to cannibalize my republic.

In the pursuit of "merit, equality, fairness, tolerance, and social justice," should public and/or private funds be invested in designing a "best" social system of genes, memes, machines, or AI's --- to farm and/or replace all present persons, republics, and cultures? What cloud of metaphysical moralists and mad scientists should determine and design such a "best" system? F them.

Merit, for its appreciation, depends on free acting, free thinkers. Without their participation, merit becomes a farce for defending enserfment and/or enslavement. F the open society, NWO people farmers. Cheers for the Second Amendment and the Tree of Liberty!