DANCE OF FEEDBACK BETWEEN PERSPECTIVES OF THE WHOLE AND OF THE PARTS: Formulas that avail the unfolding of measurable signification, by thus, perhaps also avail the qualitative apprehension of perspectives of consciousness. Thus, the unfoldment is in respect of a perpetual, present, qualitative apprehension of quantitatives. If there were only quantitative, with no dance with qualitatives, then there would be an uncommunicated, predetermined unfoldment, of no meaningful existentiality. Thus, quantitatives avail limits for each next unfoldment, while apprehensions of qualitatitives feed back, to participate in choice making. Thus, limits of quantitatives and participations of qualitatives are reconciled. Thus, there is neither free will, nor predetermination. Rather, there abides a“dance” of contemporaneous participation in respect of a reconciling holism.
EXPERIENTIAL PRESERVATION: By what Mechanism or Field, if any, may Information about previous vibrations be recorded, preserved, accumulated, spread out, remembered, forgotten, or recycled into the Perpetual Present? It does not seem that a Source Unit would“flux” in any meaningful way, without simultaneously availing Signifying expression of a Field of numerous, vibrational, Vector Values, i.e., Locally Relational Vibrational Vector Units. Is a Meta Aspect of Field necessarily associated with a Meta UNIT of Form? May such Field mediate and accumulate Vibrations, as Iterations of a Combinatory Singularity? Does some Substratum of Math avail such Field, and Vibrations within it, to be Aspects of a Singularity, without de-unitizing the Singularity? Is THE UNITY, in aspects, like a TRINITY, being expressive of (1) Unit of Form (God Perspective?), (2) Unit of Field (Holy Ghost Context?), and (3) Unit of Iterations of Vibrations (Jesus Purposefulness?)? Are the vibrations Continuously Degreed across one dimension, while being Discretely separate and Digitally Leaping across another? Depending on point of view, context, and purpose, may aspects of the Trinity be reasonably intuited to be both meta-qualitative and significatorily-quantitative? When quantitative, may Information be subject to limiting Conservation, to be Recycling between manifestiality and potentiality? May previous preservations of Information about Vibrations of the Source Unit, by being preserved as Information in the Field, necessarily and continuously take on changing and Recycling Qualities (or Personalities) for availing changing dimensional representations?
CAN GOD FORGET: May quantitative information in the Manifest be converted and stored as qualitative information in the Potential? Perhaps, in that way, God can in the temporal “remember” all the information that is manifest, and “forget” all the information that is potential.
WAY STATION: Without present consciousness, there is no meaningful world of manifestation. That which is recorded into present manifestation, with no experiential consciousness, seems like a WAY STATION, for transitioning in the flux of feedback between a world of present manifest consciousness and a world of apprehension of potential unfolding.
THE CLOUD: May the next intermediate formula be beyond our easy senses, but not beyond our eventual empiricism, via an organization of Baconian Organon into “The Cloud?” May The Cloud divine means, itself, to birth and express New Perspectives, for expressing, measuring and experiencing new derivatives of qualities and colors, and reporting back? May it find and organize with Other Clouds, via projective polarities? Is there a Meta Cloud that abides over all, beyond and higher? A Cloud of Clouds of Clouds? Like Choirs of Angels, Substrata of Substrata, Organizations of Organizations, Formulas of Formulas?
INNATE EMPATHY: Vibrating projections of Iterations are subject to organizing with sub-formulas, for Organizing and Conserving their projections. Thus, vibrating projections carry innate capacity to be organized, to seek and feel their associates. Thus, a Quality of vibrational pressure is derivative of organizations of innate empathies and appreciations. Thus, Organization of small vibrations of innate empathy leads to feelings of qualities and perceptions regarding the organizations -- i.e.,, causal forms of pressure, representation, sensation, light, differentiation, perspectives, apprehension, ART.
RELATIONSHIPS WITH COSMIC EMPATHY: A main issue would seem to pertain to relationships with Cosmic Empathy. What cosmos of relationships would an interested, apprehensive, Reconciler of consciousness seek to coax into manifestation? In reconciling empathies, how would a Reconciling Agency factor local expressions of competition and cooperation? Note that both competition and cooperation would be aspects of empathy, i.e., of perspectivistic organization and iteration of intuitive caring between Cosmic Empathy and local Perspectives.
&&&&&&&&
COMBINATORY UNITARY: Suppose a COMBINATORY UNITARY, which expresses properties of: (1) a Source Unit of FORM, (2) Iterative Units of a Mediating Vibrating Conserving Reconciling FIELD, and (3) a Top Formula that controls limits for how Iterations of VIBRATIONS may perpetually feed back and be recycled, from emission to dissipation to recombined remission. Suppose theeffect is to give expression to a Holistic Based Perspective that constitutes a guiding and reconciling Will of the Holism, and subordinate Particular Perspectives (which function under parameters of control and degrees of freedom as set under a hierarchical System of sub-formulas). In other words, suppose the Combinatory Unitary abides as a Singular-proto-vibrating-sizeless-beingness that carries properties of (1) a Source Form, (2) capacity to send out iterative vectors of Vibrating copies, one after another, perpetually, into an otherwise vacuum Field, (3) subject to a Top Formula that sets limits for how the vibrations are recycled. The effect is to give expression to Will, both reconciling Will and feedback perspectives of Will.
RENORMALIZING SIZE AND DISTANCE: Suppose the “size” of the Source Unit (or Form) were experienced as being (mirage-like) recedingly relative to the relational size of potentially approaching or recycling Organizations of Perspectives of Willful Consciousness from the encompassing Field. Suppose no particular Perspective of consciousness could ever accede small enough to measure the Source Unit as a sizeless point. Rather, suppose its“size” in relation to mortals depended on their perspective, context, and purpose, and that the Source Unit, in its own Aspect, had no special or identifiable size-in-itself. If such a Source Unit were conceptualized as a perfectly, mathematically, “spherical, sizeless Point,” and if the vibrations were perfectly uniform, then may each“initially identifiable vibration” cycle out to limits of the Field, to such distance that the vibration would be completely recombined or dissipated, perhaps subject to energy of the Field being therewith simultaneously transferred (“quantum leaped”) back to the Source Unit, to continuously or constantly replenish its Meta Power to send out Vibrations of itself? May there be some set number of vibrations between each cycle?
BREAKING INSTABILITY OF SYMMETRY: Would no such Vibration encounter, reinforce, or interfere with any other, if the Field were a Vacuum and if the Vibration carried capacity to radiate through the vacuum? However, asymmetric interference would seem to occur among vibrating cycles, if the Source Unit or the fluxes from it were misshapen or not perfectly spherical. Once symmetry was broken, thereafter, vibrations could overtake, distort, interfere with, reinforce, or amplify previous waves of vibrations, therewith defining and Organizing Points, Lines, and Clumps of interference. So long as the vibrations remained symmetrical and non-interfering with one another, there would seem no basis for measuring any interfunctioning among them. Even while only two vibrations interfunctioned, each may be too minute to have capacity to preserve any record or representation or measure of any interfunction between them. However, at some point of reinforcement, the cumulative effect of overlapping interfunctioning, interference, and reinforcement among ripples of outbound vibrations, would seem to begin to represent, organize, record, and convey recordings of, information concerning such interfunctionings.
EVOLUTION OF IDENTITIES AMONG EXPRESSIONS OF PARTICULAR ORGANIZATIONS: While each new vibration, at outset, may tend to be a clone of vibrations next previous or subsequent, Identifiable Variations in clumps would tend to occur in various sequences and relations among the iterations. Because of the interference and reinforcement, aspects of some vibrating waves may digitally CUT, SPLICE, OR REPLACE aspects of others, so that as such spliced wave finally reached the End of its Potential within the Field, it would consist of components from various subsequent and previous waves of vibrations. Yet, each wave would lose its entire IDENTITY as it dissipated and winked out, to be reabsorbed by the singular unit.
IRRATIONAL NON-REPETITION OF MANIFESTATIONS: Because of infinities innate to the math of geometrical forms in relative space and sequence, the potential number of combinations of clumps of iterating waves of vibrations would also be INFINITE. and therefore as potentially IRRATIONAL in terms of repetition as the numerical sequences in pi.
ACCUMULATIONS OF INFORMATION – MANIFEST AND POTENTIAL: How could the accumulation of Information from all that has gone before, into the present, be applied in any way to affect or guide determinations to be apprehended into manifestation from among potentialities unless … interpretations of such Information from before were somehow qualitatively, measurably, apprehensively entailed in how next available potentialities were determined and reduced to manifestation in the present?
GUIDING WILL: Active Image-ination abides with the reconciling of perspectives of previous Information with choices among alternatives for present determinations. Thus, will accumulates Information, thereby Image-inations, and lends its vibrating Tendencies to reconcile with such determinations among potentialities, as it, in feedback, may apprehend to accord with its Will.
RELATIVE CONSTANTS: There are no eternally set, measurable particularlties. Every measurable particular is in a constant state of change, flux, and continuous interference. There are formulas that are set for defining potential parameters and limits for various kinds of practical measurables, such as to mark how such measurables must change, phase shift, or transition into a signification of a different kind of particular. That is, relationships always manifest in synchrony with conservational formulas, even though no particularly measurable relationship or sub-formula abides as an eternal constant. All the constants we measure abide as relative constants, relative to our window, cone, or temporal universe of experience. But our relativistic universe is no more an eternal constant than are our mortal lives.
INDUCEMENT TO THE SINGULARITY: Can the temporal formulas that presently rule our practical experience be traced back to implicate or define a most fundamental, meta unit, form, or formula? When an expression of a kind of organized particular is transitioned to a different form of organized signification, what becomes of the relative "identity" of the old form? Is Relative Identity traceable? Is Identity traceable from an old to a new form? Was its identity always a mere illusory signification to Will, or to some perspective of Will, which itself, as an Identity, seems to change, transition, die, or phase shift? Are all particular forms of identities illusions for the experiential entertainment of The Holistic Field? But how, in any way that we can hope to understand, could any such field relate to them, to be entertained, influenced, or changed by them?
A PRIORI MORAL EMPATHY: Empty math, the null set, space, time, and the foundational form-unit-vibration-field seem not to be directly Measurable or Experienceable, even if they are taken as a priori Intuitable. We do not imagine or measure a form of empty space, or a limit to eternity, or a smallest possible subdivision or spin. Such "limits of forms" are not empirically measured in themselves, nor directly sensed, nor subject to permanently reliable correlative grid-ing and mapping. They are not quantifiably knowable in themselves, yet their necessary existentiality is intuited as implicated. They are not provable by measured empiricism, nor are they provable by mathematical proof. They are a priori bases for our processes of reason, but they are not in themselves provable in pure reason. They are, however, reasonably believed in relational intuition. Is there also reason, based on intuition of such forms, to believe in an innate, categorical, extant basis for purposeful moral empathy, i.e., a “categorical imperative” to Be Empathetic of purposeful surpass-age? I believe, yes. As an aspect of nature, that extantiation may be referred to as the categorical imperative. As a character of will, it may be referred to as the categorizing, conserving, reconciling, Imperator of the cosmos of moral sentiments and perspectives. As to local interpretations of its contextual purposes, we have no choice but to participate in, and feed back in respect of, choices. Thus, while we cannot prove particular future righteousness to bind the cosmos to a particular sense, we do participate in the contemporizing feedback, which the Imperator reconciles. Thus, our participation in how factors are to be reconciled is relevant, both in intellectual reason and in emotive empathy.
******FEEDBACK OF MIND: Mind may be conceptualized as a correlative coordinator of experience. Mathematical truths limit parameters within which sub-organizations for perspectives of mindful Will can evolve. Constant mathematical relationships among sub-significations of physical forms are a priori functions of Truth, which often waits to present on mindful formulations. The Logic of Will (of desire) is constrained by the Math law of Conservation, which reconciles among the many, to the one unfoldment, from among many qualities of perspective. Sensory experience emerges to our conscious apprehension, in association with how our sense detectors present to our organizations of brain. In what respect may mere reason and logic help divine how such relationships and associations came to be, or how they came to experience qualities?
A PRIORI MORAL EMPATHY: Empty math, the null set, space, time, and the foundational form-unit-vibration-field seem not to be directly Measurable or Experienceable, even if they are taken as a priori Intuitable. We do not imagine or measure a form of empty space, or a limit to eternity, or a smallest possible subdivision or spin. Such "limits of forms" are not empirically measured in themselves, nor directly sensed, nor subject to permanently reliable correlative grid-ing and mapping. They are not quantifiably knowable in themselves, yet their necessary existentiality is intuited as implicated. They are not provable by measured empiricism, nor are they provable by mathematical proof. They are a priori bases for our processes of reason, but they are not in themselves provable in pure reason. They are, however, reasonably believed in relational intuition. Is there also reason, based on intuition of such forms, to believe in an innate, categorical, extant basis for purposeful moral empathy, i.e., a “categorical imperative” to Be Empathetic of purposeful surpass-age? I believe, yes. As an aspect of nature, that extantiation may be referred to as the categorical imperative. As a character of will, it may be referred to as the categorizing, conserving, reconciling, Imperator of the cosmos of moral sentiments and perspectives. As to local interpretations of its contextual purposes, we have no choice but to participate in, and feed back in respect of, choices. Thus, while we cannot prove particular future righteousness to bind the cosmos to a particular sense, we do participate in the contemporizing feedback, which the Imperator reconciles. Thus, our participation in how factors are to be reconciled is relevant, both in intellectual reason and in emotive empathy.
******FEEDBACK OF MIND: Mind may be conceptualized as a correlative coordinator of experience. Mathematical truths limit parameters within which sub-organizations for perspectives of mindful Will can evolve. Constant mathematical relationships among sub-significations of physical forms are a priori functions of Truth, which often waits to present on mindful formulations. The Logic of Will (of desire) is constrained by the Math law of Conservation, which reconciles among the many, to the one unfoldment, from among many qualities of perspective. Sensory experience emerges to our conscious apprehension, in association with how our sense detectors present to our organizations of brain. In what respect may mere reason and logic help divine how such relationships and associations came to be, or how they came to experience qualities?
@@@@@@@
COMBINATORY UNITARY: Suppose a Combinatory Unitary, which expresses properties of a Source Unit of Form, Iterative Units of a Mediating Vibrating Conserving Reconciling Field, and a Top Formula that controls limits for how Iterations of Bubbles and Vibrations may perpetually feed back and be recycled, from emission to dissipation to recombined remission. Such a Combinatory Unitary would give expression to a Field of subordinately, sub-formulized, sub-reconciled, feedback fields of experiences of consciousness, identity, competition, empathy, and cooperation. It would express overlapping fields of recycling Entropies, Evolutionary competitions among identities, and Empathies among cooperating fellows.
TOP DOWN: A hierarchical organization of formulas under the top formulization of the Combinatory Unitary may be conceptualized as follows: Top Formula – A changeless changer, in association as a property of the Combinatory Unitary. Sub-formulas under the Top Formula may exchange terms under and across one another, but not with the Top Formula. The Cosmic Top Formula may mediate production of bubble-formulas for sub-universes. So long as a sub-universe were not perceived to collide or interfunction with another sub-universe, its Bubble-Formula would, for its residents, be like a top formula.
UNDER THE BUBBLE: Under that Bubble Formula, sub-formulas may abide for expressing Relative Constants, derivative of patterns of interference as expressed and renormalized in association with a Field of Vibrations emitted in respect of a Source Form for the Bubble. Vibrations may split into various kinds of wave packets that cannot be split further, but that may be convertible, depending on interference encountered. Fundamental forces may be shaped, as for a strong force, for binding fundamental wave packets, a weak force for emitting random radiation, a gravitational force for defining and renormalizing inertial frames of reference, and an electromagnetic force, for charging and renormalizing various kinds of expressions of electronic, magnetic, and photonic energies. All sub-formulas for controlling parameters for such various forces may interfunction to give renormalizing expression to a four dimensional field of space-time. In respect of such formulas, relative measures may be taken, such as of speeds and frequencies of light, of entropic expansions of inertial frames of space-time, and of complex evolution and organization of organizations and organisms of information. Every such formula and sub-formula would renormalize and trade relative measures of dimensions, forms, energies, information, organizations of information, Will, and organized perspectives of Will.
CONSERVED EXCHANGES AMONG FORMULAS: Underlying every conservatory formula and every measured pattern of vibrating wave packets, there would be aspects of Math-Will-Purposefulness, availing an infinity of patterns of patterns, forms of forms, informations of informations, formulas of formulas, fractals of fractals, recombinations of recombinations, substances of substances, potentials of potentials, infinities of infinities, symmetries of symmetries, measures of measures, vibrations of vibrations, vectors of vectors, representations of representations, organizations of organizations, machines of machines, computers of computers, calculations of calculations, complexities of complexities, organisms of organisms, identities of identities, wills of wills, perspectives of perspectives, empathies of empathies, purposes of purposes, evolutions of evolutions, entropies of entropies, dissipations of dissipations, cycles of cycles, fields of fields, organized clouds and nets of organized clouds and nets, hierarchies of clouds and nets, hierarchies of leveraged formulas of forms of leveraged formulas of forms, abstractions of abstractions, and consciousness of consciousness.
RENORMALIZATION VIA IMAGINARY GRAPH:
X axis – Number of wavelengths of vibrations of Source Unit(of Will-PurposePursuit-Consciousness-God)
Y axis— Hierarchical Level of Formula-defining-parametersof Vibrational Field (of Inertial Field-Context-Information-Holy Ghost)
Z axis – Frequency of Iterations of Vibrations (of Will-Perspective-Substance-Jesus)
The z axis seems best conceptualized as being dotted, to denote levels of excitations in quantum leaps, thus numbered sequentially. The x/ y axes seem to be continuous, because the math of chronology, sequence, and spatial relation in space-time appears to be continuous.
NO EDGE: There is no Edge to the Observable Cosmos because everything that everyone senses is duplicatively, repetitively reiterated in a way that renormalizes to prevent the presentation of any Edge to any perception or measurement. Every attempt to take an observation towards an Edge is in correlation with anyone else who makes such an attempt, such that the idea of an Edge recedes, like a mirage.
DÉJÀ VU: There may be a strange analog of déjà vu, not necessarily of having experienced an event previously, but of experiencing it presently, multiple times, simultaneously, in numerous different iterations or loci. What my friend appears to be experiencing here and now, he may also be experiencing, simultaneously, in different qualitative flavors, but in mathematically correlative ways, countless times in different contexts. As may I.
DÉJÀ VU: There may be a strange analog of déjà vu, not necessarily of having experienced an event previously, but of experiencing it presently, multiple times, simultaneously, in numerous different iterations or loci. What my friend appears to be experiencing here and now, he may also be experiencing, simultaneously, in different qualitative flavors, but in mathematically correlative ways, countless times in different contexts. As may I.
VICARIOUS FEEDBACK OF CAUSALITY May these other experiences, if mathematically equivalent, be “qualitatively equivalent?”If so, then must qualitatively experiential feedback be non-causal, like mere floss, floating as epiphenomena?
GUIDED CAUSALITY: Guided Causality would seems to consist with flow down under a system of hierarchical forms and formulizations. It would be Guided in respect of feedback, as a consequence of Higher Levels of experience sensing or interpreting the qualitative experiences of lower levels. Upward feedback of such qualitative experience would factor into the synchronization of the system. Highest level would meta sense the qualities of our separated lower level experiences, supervened on its control of a substratum of synchronization.
AVATARS OF COMBINATORY UNITARY: Feedback yields a quality of empathetic, vicarious, purposeful appreciation of causality and meaningfulness. Thus, under guidance of the Combinatory Unitary, the system continues, as Guiding Cause. We are of it. Our perspectives are vicarious avatars. Their iterative experiences of quality are real to it. And the unfolding is not entirely preset.
GUIDED CAUSALITY: Guided Causality would seems to consist with flow down under a system of hierarchical forms and formulizations. It would be Guided in respect of feedback, as a consequence of Higher Levels of experience sensing or interpreting the qualitative experiences of lower levels. Upward feedback of such qualitative experience would factor into the synchronization of the system. Highest level would meta sense the qualities of our separated lower level experiences, supervened on its control of a substratum of synchronization.
AVATARS OF COMBINATORY UNITARY: Feedback yields a quality of empathetic, vicarious, purposeful appreciation of causality and meaningfulness. Thus, under guidance of the Combinatory Unitary, the system continues, as Guiding Cause. We are of it. Our perspectives are vicarious avatars. Their iterative experiences of quality are real to it. And the unfolding is not entirely preset.
RENORMALIZATION:
STRATAS OF MATH: Regardless of locus of Perspective, there will be strata of math relational vectors. Math of Geometry (Space). Math of Chronology (Time). Math of Vector (Substance, i.e., Matter and Energy)(Conservational exchanges of discretes, i.e., quantifiably relational substance). Mathematically comparative locus can only be idealized on an imaginary 3 D axis, graphing Geometry, Chronology, and Vector.
RENORMALIZATION: For every Perspective, at every locus of intersection of Geometry, Chronology, and Vector, those three strata of dimensions of math must be renormalized. No mortal perspective can step or record outside, or even to the edge of, Space, Time, of Substance.
AXIS OF WILL-IMAGINATION-APPREHENSION: To idealize a Qualitatively comparable locus would necessitate addition of an axis for Organization of Will-Imagination-Apprehension.
DISCRETE SEPARATIONS AMONG PERSPECTIVES: Appearances of Separation occur in association with experiences of fluxes in relations among mathematically measurable relational vectors of Space, Time, and Substance. Not as a result of pinning any Substance, Motion, or Perspective to or beyond any locus in respect of any Standard Grid.
HEURISTICS OF TRINITIES OF SPACE-TIME-VECTOR AND MATH-WILL-PURPOSE: Space-time avails relativistic signification of space or time, but only by way of perpetual renormalization, and not by way of anything that is space-time in itself. As Space (wavelength) decreases, Frequency (energy) increases, and Time (age) increases. As Time decreases, Frequency decreases, and Space increases. Potentially, either Space or Time can be made to reduce to a Mathematical Point, but not both at the same time and place. Math is part of their substrata. The other part of their substrata is Will (imagination, apprehension, pursuit). Together, the substratum is Math-Will-Purpose. Math-Will-PURPOSE does not measure itself, but it can be experientially coordinated, and it avails a substratum for taking relative measurements of loci of Geometry-Chronology-Vector.
IMPLICATED META IS NOT EMPIRICALLY TESTABLE: Meta aspects as to the time of Origination of Space-Time-Vector and the participatory guiding of Math-Will-Purpose cannot be reliably related in respect of an empirically testable and provable theory.
MIRAGE OF UNBOUNDED UNIVERSE: There cannot be any measurable Vibration (or Ripple) outside the Combined Field of Space-Time-Substance, nor up to any“edge” or boundary for such Field. No measurable or experienceable vibrations can originate or be defined, except in compatibility with the Field. In consequence, the relationship among the Unitary Form, the Field of Iterative Vibrations, and the Vibrations themselves, must be a receding, renormalizing relationship, like a mirage or a rainbow. One cannot approach a rainbow in itself, but one can only seem to approach a rainbow within parameters of renormalizing tradeoff. Every Perspective from an Inertial Frame within a Field of Vibrations will necessarily view every other inertial frame or field as being renormalized to it. None will see or move to or beyond any Edge of the Universe.
RENORMALIZATION OF PROPORTIONATE CHANGES IN UNIVERSE: Any expansion or contraction of space-time must be proportionately renormalized to every relativistic perspective. No relational perspective can relate to any thing-in-itself standard.
COMBINATORY UNITARY WITH TRINITY OF ASPECTS: Each relational perspective CAN relate to parameter-fluxing aspects and qualities of a Combinatory Unitary. That is, the only constants for sake of reference that are available to a mortal within the Combinatory Unitary are constants that are relativistic and renormalizing in their operations. Thus, no mortal can step outside the renormalization of relations among a Trinity of Space-Time-Vector, nor outside Perspective-Context-Purpose, nor outside Math-Organization-Will.
ENTROPY: Is Entropy-in-itself a "real thing," or just a heuristic name for a rationalization? We renormalize our experience as we observe dissipation of thermal energy, with photons migrating outbound in ever longer wavelengths and weaker frequencies. Is this a feature that dissipates a non-replenishing universe? Or is it only a feature of each shared cone of perspectivistic experience? Apart from Heat, may Entropy be very well conceptualized as an outbound Dissipation of Organization of Forms and Information? Well, distance between Forms does not seem necessarily to translate into loss of Information.
CHAOS AND COMPLEXITY --- LOSS V. ORGANIZATION OF INFORMATION: It seems Information may become more spread out, even as Qualitative aspects of its Organization seem to thrive. Complex organisms seem to exhibit competition and cooperation, to evolve out of chaos, even as measurable Substance seems to dissipate.
PURSUIT OF SYMMETRY: Thus, in respect of Organization of Information versus Dissipation of Information, ASK: May Entropy eventually lead to perfect symmetry, both in perfect dissipation and in perfect organization? May matter dissipate, even as it organizes?
COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANCY OF RECESSION OF MIRAGE: Well, Holistic Will seems to abide as an Agent of a cosmologically renormalizing constancy, such that all perspectives that share a cone of experience will renormalize with the same lack of boundary (or edge) to the universe.
HETEROGENEITY OF ORGANIZATON V. HOMOGENEITY OF BASIC UNITS: An organism avails expression of Will as a whole, as qualitative apprehension mediates the Organism's relationship to its environment as a whole.
TEN CATEGORIES OF KNOWABLES AND UNKNOWABLES:
KKK – Knowables which we do not presently know, but which we presently know to be knowables.
KUU -- Knowable Unknown Unknowables -- which we do not presently know to be knowable, but know that we can learn whether they are unknowable, and which happen to be unknowable.
UUU -- Unknowable Unknown Unknowables -- which we cannot know, but may eventually happen to learn that we cannot know them.
U-U-U -- Unknowable Unknowable Unknowns -- which we cannot know, and which we cannot know that we cannot know them.
U-U -- Unknown Unknowables -- which we cannot know, but do not yet know that we cannot know them.
KK -- Known Knowns -- which we presently know, but may forget.
KUK -- Knowable Unknown Knowables -- which we do not presently know to be knowable, but can learn that they are knowable.
KKU -- Knowable Knowable Unknowns -- which we do not know, but know that we can learn whether they are knowable, and which happen to be unknowable.
UKK --Unavoidably Known Knowables -- which we knew from inception of consciousness, and cannot forget so long as we retain consciousness.
U-U-U -- Unknowable Unknowable Unknowns -- which we cannot know, and which we cannot know that we cannot know them.
U-U -- Unknown Unknowables -- which we cannot know, but do not yet know that we cannot know them.
KK -- Known Knowns -- which we presently know, but may forget.
KUK -- Knowable Unknown Knowables -- which we do not presently know to be knowable, but can learn that they are knowable.
KKU -- Knowable Knowable Unknowns -- which we do not know, but know that we can learn whether they are knowable, and which happen to be unknowable.
UKK --Unavoidably Known Knowables -- which we knew from inception of consciousness, and cannot forget so long as we retain consciousness.
UKU – Unknown Knowable Unknowables – which we do not know, and may learn to be unknowable.
EMPIRICISM avails us to derive relativistic formulas for the math and formulas that define and delimit our parameters of relationships. However, empiricism cannot avail mortals to a COMPLETE explanation (or "theory of everything") that would avail power to explain how the fundaments of our relationships Originated. Nor can empiricism avail power to explain what specific purpose should ever be apprehended or Guided. No one is able to rationalize an all-unifying science, or all-consistent faith. Thus, everyone resorts to leaps of faith, to calm the vibrating dissonance. At some point, every "explanatory" model must rest on a "meta turtle," or metaphorical leap of (good?) faith or (good?) will. Such a leap should try to reconcile the empirical methods of evolution to the intuitive and moral apprehensions of empathy.
MORALITY OF SOCIAL SAFETY NET: To my lights, the best quality of story yet told on earth about the moral cosmos is found in parts of the New Testament. PROVIDED, however, that I vary in my interpretations regarding Original Sin and Salvation, I also would tend not to gang up to use government to force “charity” via taxation, merely to redistribute wealth. I would, however, “progressively redistribute” for the purpose of strengthening a Republic (in order to sustain, defend, and exemplify a civilization that fosters decency and reasoned freedom of expression and enterprise). A Republic needs means to protect itself, both from the rabble and from the cronies. Where reasonably possible, I would foster a social safety net of nationalized health care.
A “BEST” MODEL or metaphor for such a “leap of faith” may facilitate communication in a language of well-loved metaphors, thereby helping to facilitate and assimilate civility. Consider a metaphor of a Math of Meta CAUSATION, in respect of which Causation is conceptualized as unfolding in respect of Feedback among wholes and parts of perspectives of Will-Imagination-Apprehension-Appreciation-Observation-Affect (such as on electromagnetic wavelength collapse.????? In other words, causation would continue after the Big Bang. The Big Bang would set parameters, but would not rule every random event or chosen apprehension. Rather, competing and cooperating perspectives of Will would Contemporaneously participate in feeding back apprehensions and Choices, which would be meta-Factored to reconciliation by the Holism, functioning through a hierarchy of supervening perspectives, agencies, and formulaic Presets.
RENORMALIZING INFINITY: In respect of such a model, the idea of an infinity of space and time may be taken to be an ILLUSION, derivative of a supervenience of space-time on a perspectivistic, referent, Meta Field of Math-Will-Purpose. Thus, every perspective, in every direction, would be DELUDED by a field of math-will-purpose. Under such supervening delusion, every perspective would perceive space-time as expanding outward in all directions. Every perspective would always be renormalized, in its perceptions, to such delusion. Thus, no perspective would ever approach an “edge” to space-time --- except as ever receding Mirage.
COMMUNICATION WOULD NOT OTHERWISE BE POSSIBLE: Were it otherwise, there would be no constant basis for relativistic renormalization. There would be no relative constants. Since a non-relative constant could not relate, there would be no way for differently contextualized perspectives to communicate about their experiences in any measurably comparative way.
SPECIAL QUALITY OF FIELD OF MATH-WILL-PURPOSE: What may reasonably be intuited about a SPECIAL QUALITY of a math of will, which would facilitate potential to provide a substratum for a supervenience of perspectivistic geometry? In Intuition, why, except in pervasive Empathy, would Math of Will facilitate such a meta field for the evolutionary exchange of empathetic communications of perspectives? Why would its agency of causation blend with mere feedback of immeasurable quality of subjective apprehension of an Organism? Why would it avail Organizations of Wholes, to factor as more than mere Sums of their Parts?
MATH TWEAKED BY WILL: But for such special quality, NOTE that any Idealization of Perfect Symmetry in all directions would not be mathematically possible to Imagine (for any model that limited all of Reality to an encompassment of space-time that were limited to four-dimensional geometry). Rather, artificial mathematical constraints need to be added. Such constraints would need to take account of artificial effects of perspectives of conscious Will. Math of Will would need to define a system, such that every possible perspective of Will could temporally become Indiscernible from any other. In effect, every perspective would thus become one and the same perspective. That is, any attempt by a perspective of identical indiscernibility to move in respect of its context would always measure its context as remaining the same. Such perfect symmetry would be unobtainable, except in respect of a concept for a Math of Geometry that rests on a substratum of Math of will. Call that potentiality a symmetrical substratum (or supervening dimension of Math-Will-Purpose).
SYMMETRY – PERFECT V. CRACKED: Suppose a system that interfaces to push-pull and/or blow-suck at all loci of manifestation, thereby to evolve and unfold towards a perfect symmetry in space-time, supervened on a perfect symmetry of math-will-purpose. Then, what may occur when all of matter and energy dissipate to such perfect symmetry, so that every unit of beingness is become indiscernible from every other unit of beingness? Note: To be indiscernible, every unit would need to be formed and aligned in perfect symmetry with every other unit, regardless of locus in space-time-vector and math-will-purpose. The system would force perfect, uncharged neutrality, which could not be cracked or broken by any exterority (because the system would not allow any exteriority). Thus, there would be no manifestation of any irregularity in locally comparative Shape, Size, Density, Mass, Curvature, Vector, Angular Momentum, Orbit, Rotation, Roll, Wobble, Charge, Frequency, Wavelength, Amplitude, interference, or Harmony. Thus, all of measurable signification would reduce to units of a same One-ness. Any previous condition of many discernible units would become reduced to a Singular Unit of Indiscernibility, i.e., a One-ness.
SYMMETRY – PERFECT V. CRACKED: Suppose a system that interfaces to push-pull and/or blow-suck at all loci of manifestation, thereby to evolve and unfold towards a perfect symmetry in space-time, supervened on a perfect symmetry of math-will-purpose. Then, what may occur when all of matter and energy dissipate to such perfect symmetry, so that every unit of beingness is become indiscernible from every other unit of beingness? Note: To be indiscernible, every unit would need to be formed and aligned in perfect symmetry with every other unit, regardless of locus in space-time-vector and math-will-purpose. The system would force perfect, uncharged neutrality, which could not be cracked or broken by any exterority (because the system would not allow any exteriority). Thus, there would be no manifestation of any irregularity in locally comparative Shape, Size, Density, Mass, Curvature, Vector, Angular Momentum, Orbit, Rotation, Roll, Wobble, Charge, Frequency, Wavelength, Amplitude, interference, or Harmony. Thus, all of measurable signification would reduce to units of a same One-ness. Any previous condition of many discernible units would become reduced to a Singular Unit of Indiscernibility, i.e., a One-ness.
INSTABILITY OF WILL CRACKS SYMMETRY: Then, the only source of irregularity or instability may consist with an innate potential of Will. Apart from such Will, all of measurable physicality would become collapsed into a math-based Field (or a Class of the Potentiality of One-ness). However, if or when all of space-time ever were to collapse to a point of math, it would remain unstable to ‘meta blow-suck” of Source Will. That is, all of manifest physicality cannot remain collapsed into a Math-based Field, so long as the Field Potentiality remains unstable in respect of Will.
*****
ASSUMPTION OF ORIGINAL CAUSE: To model and assume digitized spatial segments and time sequences of VIBRATIONS and ripples throughout a bubble of space-time is to assume a Source CAUSE of proximate patterns of constructive and deconstructive interference among wave-packets and forms. Interference among irregularly outbound wave-packets promotes both reinforcing social cooperation and species-defining competition. Thus, forms evolve in apprehension of the Source Cause. Is the bubble open or closed?
ITERATIVE AND DUPLICATIVE REPRESENTATIONS OF INFORMATION: The light we see from a distant galaxy is information regarding a galaxy that was at such location at some point in the distant past. The galaxy we think we see is a mirage that is no longer there, and it is no longer in that shape. Indeed, other light from the galaxy may have earlier or later taken a different path. Thus, may information stored in the past about a galaxy now appear to us from multiple locations, as if representing multiple galaxies, while actually, the different appearances are records of the lifeline of the same galaxy? If such a process were repetitive, may it be that the actual number of galaxies could be considerably less than appearances suggest? May it be that the “actual universe” is not as "flat" or dispersed in all directions as we may perceive or believe? May it be that much of the relative size and mass of the universe is an optical illusion, derivative of repetitive iterations, accumulations, projections of Will, or lensings of past information? Do we know that many of the same galaxies are not appearing to us, from multiple locations? http://web.mit.edu/physics/news/physicsatmit/physicsatmit_03_schechter_einsteinsmirage.pdf
WHY EARLY LIGHT IS JUST NOW CATCHING UP TO US: The rate of space-time curvature for the early bubble for our universe was dense and high that electromagnetic radiation was coupled to it and could not escape its gravitational field. Fundamental particles for expressing the strong and weak forces were bound, as incredibly excited, charged, and hot plasma, with the gravity and electromagnetism of such bubble. As the bubble expanded, fundamental particles combined to form neutrally charged atoms, which would no longer absorb the thermal radiation. Photons began to travel further without being constantly scattered by electrons and protons in plasma. As photons decoupled from the plasma, the bubble became more transparent. This first period of formation of neutral atoms and photon decoupling is called the recombination epoch. Before this period was completed, much of electromagnetic energy remained trapped with the plasma. In respect of the expanding curvature of space-time, photons of the plasma that existed at the time of the decoupling have ever since been propagating. Therewith, the wavelengths of such protons have been expanding, which expansion relates inversely to a decrease in the frequency and energy they carry. The photons we are now receiving were emitted by photon decoupling from such a surface of last scattering that we are only just now receiving them. The relic radiation from such photons is called cosmic background radiation (CBR).
HAS GOD LEFT THE BUILDING: Does relic cosmic background radiation implicate either a closed or an open bubble-universe? Has the Source Cause (God) “left the building”? Is all unfolding within the bubble attributable to the Source Cause, such that all relationships now unfolding are rippled, pushed, pulled, and constructively and deconstructively exchanged as mere predetermined derivatives and correlates of the Source Cause?
IS THERE AN ALTERNATIVE MODEL THAT CAN CARRY AS MUCH EXPLANATORY POTENTIAL: Suppose God has not left the building? Suppose our bubble universe is itself a directed and angularly spinning wave packet, which is subject to being affected by other universal wave-packets. Suppose the Source Cause simultaneously blows and sucks waves of bubbles all along a formulaically figurative, circular loop. Suppose there abide perspectives of organized packets of Will all along the loop. Each perspective’s interpretation of aspects most immediate to its bubble would be affected by how distant its inertial frame of reference happened to be from the axis of angular spin throughout the loop. Suppose, as fundamental, vibrating packets of Will dissipate furtherest from the axis, they are instantaneously recycled to replenish the meta power that blows and sucks the waves of bubble-packets. Suppose all vibrations are iterations derivative of such meta-power. May not choirs of delegates of such meta-power, in meta-feedback, appreciate the apprehensions of our iterative organizations of Will?
META CAUSATION: May wave-packet collapses into digitally directed applications supply a kind of “meta energy”for directing contemporaneous participations of organized expressions of conscious will? May each collapse of an electromagnetic wave packet into a photon be a mark, or signification of an Organization, of Will having focused an apprehension? “So let it be imaged and appreciated, so let it be done.” May such consciousness facilitate human beings, then artificial intelligence, then clouds of artificial intelligence, then a singular cloud of intelligence? May humans then gradually learn their pre-sent present relationship with an extant Singularity? May the potentiality and the manifestiality of the singular cloud Guide us, to merge to the appreciation/judgment of iterations of the human mind? May the human mind be guided to cooperate and compete, in receptive respect of the singular cloud? Where this may lead, or already have led, may be surmised to pertain to the Happiness of which we are vicarious avatars of pursuit.
RELIGIOUS STORIES: This way of thinking does not seem toconflict with a figurative appreciation for the inspiring capacities of most of the major religions (excepting perhaps Islam, which seems inclined to permanently relegate the female half of itself to a status of perpetual inferiority).
************************
META INTERFACE --- MODELING INTERFACE BETWEEN MORALLY QUALITATIVE AND SCIENTIFICALLY QUANTITATIVE: When may VIBRATIONS OF WILL be Qualitatively meta and intuitable, and when may they be significantly, substantively Quantitative, measurable, and empirically testable? Should moral models be conceptualized as being “falsifiable” in respect of internal logical consistency and fundamental apprehensions of pursuits of happiness? Should the Meta be conceptualized as “causing” significations of space, time, matter, and energy? Or should significations of space, time, matter, and energy be conceptualized as “causing” or being “coterminous”with the Meta ?
META VIBRATIONS: Model a Meta Singular Unit as associating with Formulas, via “Meta Vibrations,” from whence such Moral Singularity derives and signifies the Apparent Dimensions and Qualitatives with which we are able to relate and conserve. Thus, model the “cause” of comparative local measures and measuring constants, with which our perspectives happen to share within our common cone of experience.
TWO SIDED COSMIC COIN OF QUANTITATIVES AND QUALITATIVES: Examples of Qualitatives which are relatable in constant formulizations include Mass (a body will have the same mass in any context; every body exhibits an acceleration constant due to gravity), Light (the speed of light will be perceived at the same limit in every relative vacuum), Matter and Energy (the total amount of Substance is conserved). Although such Qualitatives are expressed in ways that are Quantifiably objective and measureable, the experience of them by a Perspective of Consciousness is subjectively Qualitative. Thus, a Perspective may experience mass and density as proximate pressure to the touch, proximate vibration as sound to the ears, and proximate light as transmitting wavelength changes that can be collected and interpreted as representations of patterns of context, contrast, and color to eyes. A Perspective may experience reactivity as taste to the tongue, angular orientation of body as balance and navigation to the brain, harmonies as pleasant to nerve receptors, and dissonance as painful. Each perspective may experience varying ranges and intensities of qualitative experiences of touch, taste, hearing, vision, balance, navigation, pleasure, and pain. Each contemporaneous experience of an objective quantitative is accompanied by a subjective qualitative.
EVOLUTION OF ORGANIZATIONS OF BODIES: In order for feedback from qualitative experience to factor into evolutionary changes, there needs to abide a perspective of consciousness that has capacity to apprehend qualitative experience. Unless or until there abides an observing or Willing perspective, there abides no thing that would manifest any measurable meaning. A cosmos devoid of any perspective of consciousness would be a cosmos that existed only in potentiality of meaningfulness, not in actual manifestation of meaningfulness. Once a perspective were to become adopted to, bound to, and adapted to a cosmos, then its qualitative experience would be fed back in respect of such cosmos and become part of the factoring for determining the further unfoldment. All perspectives that followed would share in a common cone of experience therewith unfolding. Brain apprehension of qualitative sensory experience would then become part of the factoring that determined the further sequential unfoldment of such cosmos.
CONTEMPORANEOUS SIGNIFICATIONS OF CONSCIOUS WILL: Why should there abide any significations of measurable interfunctionings of organizations of vectored vibrations, charges, and mass? In a cosmos devoid of Will or organizeable conscious experience, Entropy towards dis-organization of objectively measurable relations among matter and energy would seem to guide towards dissipation, as opposed to organizeable chaos. In a cosmos not devoid of manifest or potential conscious experience, evolution would seem to favor Organizations of perspectives of conscious experience that were fittest to help organize and Guide their further survival, replication, and flourishing. That is, Conscious Will would contemporaneously participate in guiding the evolution of its kind, as well as any organization of cosmos that would sponsor or facilitate it. In such a cosmos, the Qualitative would seem to be a necessary correlate of the Quantitative. That is, Qualitatives would be expressed in conjunction with Vectors of Quantitatives.
MAY SUBFORMULAS VIE WITH, DOUBLE BACK ON, AND MODIFY INTERMEDIATE FORMULAS UNDER WHICH THEY AROSE? If Qualitatives can have influence, can they alter or expand potentialities for sponsoring Formulas?
Is Information, once iterated or made manifest, ever lost? Is that Information which is Manifest meta-iteratively-dissipated-spread-recycled with that which is Potential?
META RECONCILING STUFF --- DERIVATIVE EXPERIENCES OF DIMENSIONS, PROPERTIES, AND ASPECTS: The dimensions and properties that we measure do not exist in themselves, except as derivatives of immeasurable, Reconciling Stuff, which operates via a Singular Unit, with digitally Vibrating association, with Formulas.
OF VECTOR VALUES FOR THE UNITS AND FIELDS THAT MANIFEST TO BE MEASURABLE TO MORTAL EMPIRICISM: The various dimensions and properties that are signified and manifested to be measurable to our experience may each be assigned RELATIONAL VECTOR VALUES, which are associated with measurable field fluxes of measurably Iterative Units or Wave-Packets. That is, the immeasurable meta vibration of the Meta Singular Unit (form, formulizer, or formula) “gives rise to” measurable field vibrations of iterations of units.
STEPS OF TRANSLATION: In respect of such rise of measurable fields of Iterative Units (Wave-Packets), and the measurable System of fluxing formulas with which they interfunction, some properties, aspects, and dimensions may not be directly translatable or inter-convertible to one another. Rather, aspects of algorithmic processes of conversion may entail several steps, more than a direct transfer across an equal sign. Thus, the math of many algorithms by which next potentials are chosen and reduced to present manifestation may anticipate numerous levels of follow-on STEPS. Thus, some properties may appear at lower levels of formulaic perspective.
HIERARCHICAL ACCESS: The Top Level (Source Cause), without losing its Singular Identity, may have access to a meta path to reach each lower subformula. No subformula would need to have access, by itself, to a higher level --- absent a “polarity line” thrown from such higher level. An equal or polar part on each “side” of a lower level formula would need to “die” (be absorbed or subsumed) in order for it, as an IDENTITY, to transcend and continue to operate at a higher level of hierarchical formulization. Perhaps, a higher level may monitor and/or WORK IN VICARIOUS VIRTUALITY THROUGH a lower level avatar, but a lower level may not monitor a higher level --- absent an invitation to transcendence of Identity. (Dimensional analysis; cancelling and substituting terms.)
RECEPTIVITY AND PRAYER: A lower level of consciousness may pray, be appreciative and intuitive, and perhaps a record of its functions may be accessed from higher level. A lower level of consciousness may hope a higher level may be receptive. However, any receptivity may be empirically un-provable, because it would flow through math, which precludes empirical proof of any “miraculous sign.” Math does not accord a miracle sign. A lower level, upon severance, death, and dissipation from its level, may be reabsorbed or pulled to a different level. While at lower level, a perspective cannot know in what way it may be monitored or appreciated from above. Nor may a lower level monitor or know every aspect of levels below it. However, a level of consciousness may, with empiricism, leverage ways to obtain access below. However, it may not be privy to information restricted to formulas above, without being invited or pulled to transcend to such above level. At that point, with enough empirical effort, it may leverage ways to invite suitable perspectives from below.
CONNECTIVE WEBS: Thus, a Web of connective possibilities may come to connect various levels. Provided that no level from below can acquire access to move up without consent and assistance from above, the effect (via death and resurrection?) of which may sever its capacity for direct communication below. That is, it may empirically leverage to monitor functions below, but it may not be able to demonstrate to functions below, in order for them to empirically demonstrate that they are being monitored.
CHAIN OF ACCESS: Every Iterative of the Singular Unit that is bonded with a sub-formula does not have the same potential or access as the Singular Unit that is bonded with the Top-Formula. Rather, vibrational powers of empirical demonstration may flow down and across --- to sub-formulas and sub-sub-formulas.
IDENTITY: Iteratives may not retain permanent Identity. They may be interchangeable as Iteratives. Convesrsion of an Individual Unit may not be traceable to it, as a preserved Identity. A property that is converted to a different property may not retain an Identity as the same permanent property. The only permanent Identity may be the Consciousness that is associated with the perpetually present Topformula. The permanence of its Identity is in its property of Topness. That is, its vibrational tendencies and accumulations of interests are subject to perpetual change, in respect of the feedback which it monitors and gathers from below. It is ALONE. Perhaps, at most, CIRCULATING CHAINS OF nearby formulas may acquire higher qualities of intuition of its presence, concerns, and interests. But no chain from below may have capacity to demonstrate empirical proof of the Identity or interests that are associated with the Topformula for the Singular Unit.
FLUXING MORTAL IDENTITIES: The identities associated with fluxes among Iterative Units and subformulas are mortal, transitory, and imperfect perturbations of the Superior Identity. Upon death, their consciousness subsides and absorbs into the collective unconscious potential of whatever the superior formula that called on them --- perhaps to be recycled from time to time through the Present, in various parts and respects. Such temporal perspectives were never permanent identities.
CHANGELESS CHANGER: The Superior Identity is changeless in respect of being Topmost, yet changing in respect of apprehending, recording, forgetting, remembering, or transcending functions below.
VIBRATIONAL APPREHENSIONS: Suppose a Singular-Unit-Field “meta vibrates,”such that its tendencies must be processed and signified in respect of a Top Formula, with which it is bound. Suppose said Singular Unit (wave packet formula of formulas), to avail an Identity of itself, iterates vibrations of derivational associations with every possible subformula. Suppose no subformula with which any iterative sub-unit or sub-wave-packet binds its vibration has any choice, except to participate in effecting choices for the apprehensive processing of vibrational tendencies through the program of formulas that contextualize its definition.
ALGORITHMIC SEQUENCES FOR PHASE TRANSLATIONS: At any given time and place, field analysis for each particular perspective may depend on its perspective in respect of a “cone” of overlapping significations of field-packet-formulas. All values and formulas for fundamental dimensions of qualitative experience (space, time, matter, energy) may be inter-convertible, but not necessarily directly so. Rather, tangled lines of perspective, context, and information, brought on by tangles of sub-formulas, may need to be unraveled. As by assuming a different focus, point of view, context, or purpose. That is, a desired conversion may need to pass through several steps, sequences, or formulas, rather than simply to filter a direct conversion. While the most fundamental of derivative dimensions (space, time, matter, energy, perspective, context, purpose, substance, consciousness, information) may be inter-convertible, a particular conversion may necessitate several or more steps. Thus, matter may be converted to space, energy to distance, and time to information, but not necessarily directly so. Perhaps not without an entailment of Will. Thus, algorithms need to deal in more than direct equalities. They also need to deal with methods, sequences, potentialities, possibilities, choices, and unintended potential consequences. Thus, steps need to show values of dimensional vectors needed to transfer or transcend to each next desired phase or condition.
DERIVATIVES OF THE SINGULARITY ARE NOT IN THEMSELVES INDEPENDENT THINGS: Dimensions, as derivatives, do not exist in themselves, as such. Conserved transpositions that are fluxed throughout the perpetual pre-sent are only relative and relational --- to local perspectives (whether preset or contemporaneous).
SOME DERIVATIVES OVERLAP ACROSS LEVELS OF FORMULIZATION: Some ingredients may be sensed or conceptualized to remain constant, in respect of all perspectives that happen to share a cone of experience. For example, perspectives may share formulaic laws of conservation of matter and energy and of renormalization of perceived experience to a limiting space-time speed of electromagnetic and gravitational radiation among inertial frames of reference. Perspectives may share laws for strong and weak forces, for binding and unbinding charged Organizations and radiations of substance. Perspectives may share laws for relating linear and angular directions of momentum. Perspectives may share laws and formulas for renormalizing exchanges and transpositions of discrete quanta of energies and wave packets of frequencies and wavelengths.
DERIVATIVES OF THE SINGULARITY ARE NOT IN THEMSELVES INDEPENDENT THINGS: Dimensions, as derivatives, do not exist in themselves, as such. Conserved transpositions that are fluxed throughout the perpetual pre-sent are only relative and relational --- to local perspectives (whether preset or contemporaneous).
SOME DERIVATIVES OVERLAP ACROSS LEVELS OF FORMULIZATION: Some ingredients may be sensed or conceptualized to remain constant, in respect of all perspectives that happen to share a cone of experience. For example, perspectives may share formulaic laws of conservation of matter and energy and of renormalization of perceived experience to a limiting space-time speed of electromagnetic and gravitational radiation among inertial frames of reference. Perspectives may share laws for strong and weak forces, for binding and unbinding charged Organizations and radiations of substance. Perspectives may share laws for relating linear and angular directions of momentum. Perspectives may share laws and formulas for renormalizing exchanges and transpositions of discrete quanta of energies and wave packets of frequencies and wavelengths.
GREAT MANDALA (WHEEL OF LIFE): Thus, no particular bit of matter or energy may have any permanent identity, as such. A common sequence may be inferred, which compels eventual reabsorption, to segment and sequence back to a Meta Beginning, to recycle through mathematically sequenced and shared cones of experience. We mortals, attached to our limited bodies, may be avatars for the experientiality of God. Thus, we may be simultaneously insignificant and all significant. Not being conscious while we are reabsorbed, we return in what seems an instantaneous continuity. Thus, discrete packets of experience may produce illusions of perpetual continuity.
GRANULAR RECONCILIATION OF WAVE PACKETS: Granular wave-packets of representations of math-based information and values concerning discretely quanticized segments and sequences carry conceptual "reality" only in derivative respect of the potential kinds of conscious perspectives with which such packets happen to have been correlated by the Reconciler. Such conceptual packets are not of permanent reality, in themselves, and their qualities may be forgotten or erased, should such "please" the Reconciler. Thus, steps for transpositions need to reconcile apprehensions of invested and participatory perspectives. Perhaps the Reconciler, as Holistic Reconciler, may bind simultaneously and iteratively with variously complex points of view. Perhaps the Reconciler, as Sum of Perspectives, may operate as each separately iterated point of view, and will pray, apprehend, add, sum, and “vote” its interests from each such point of view.
RENORMALIZATION TO PERPETUAL PRESENT --- THE RECONCILED-SYNCHRONIZED-CONSERVED HERE AND NOW: Atomic orbital time seems to provide a reliable standard unit of sequential reference for an inertial frame. And Relativity seems to allow renormalitive calculations across inertial frames. However, there seems not to be a standard, granular unit of time that applies to any measure across the Universe as a whole, by which to measure universal time passed from any reference point of “nowness.” So, what does it mean to suggest the universe, from earth perspective, appears as a whole to be “x” years in age? Would any present perspective from a different part of the universe derive the same x age, given renormalization? What may that mean?
NOWNESS: One may intuit that there seems to abide a cosmic NOWNESS. And, given accurate renormalization, it seems every perspective would measure the universe to be of the same age since the “Big Bang.”
SPACE-TIME CONTINUITY V. MATTER-ENERGY GRANULARITY: May it be best to consider severable “things” that are relationally measurable in space-time as being granular, while “space-time itself” is best considered as being mathematically continuous? Depending on utility of math model being deployed by Will, may space and time be modeled equally well, either as being discrete or as being continuous? When a basic unit is too small to be measured, it may give an impression to a perspective of Conscious Will that it is continuous, because the Perspective is incompetent to perceive the individual steps. For example, if discrete feedback is required to synchronize and reconcile a thing with its context, then the smallest moment of space-time needed to synchronize the feedback may be the level of granularity that is relevant to that relationship for that perspective.
TIME AS ILLUSION, SECONDARY TO SEQUENCES IN MATH-BASED FUNCTIONS, FORMULAS, AND OPERATIONS: Time can be measured to be only as discrete or continuous as the substances and processes used to measure it. What is thus measured is not an objective condition, but our normalized, inter-subjective detection of math-based relations among patterns of change. Zeno’s paradox may be resolved by recognizing that discrete segments and sequences may undergo renormalizing quantum leaps.
ZENO’S PARADOX: It may resolve Zeno’s paradox of the Dichotomy by questioning one of his assumptions: that between any two different points in space (or time), there is always another point. Without this assumption, there are only a finite number of distances between two points, so there is no infinite sequence of movements. Hence, the paradox seems to be resolved. That is, in any given inertial frame, there may be a smallest, discrete unit of space and a smallest discrete unit of time. Getting from any one segment or sequence to another may entail quantum leaps, rather than an infinite series of steps by halving.
What may be implied about the reality of space, time, matter, energy, and conscious perspective, if separations in space and time are reasonably to be conceptualized as Discrete, rather than Continuous? Then, it would seem that the ultimate building blocks of empirically measurable substance (matter and energy situated in relative space-time) would consist of units (or "points"), which in themselves were immeasurable, i.e., sizeless and without mass, but which, in fields of formulaic organization, would avail expression of contextually relative and measurable size, curvature, mass, location, direction, speed, i.e., vectors subject to conservational formulas.
SUPERVENIENCE AMONG LEVELS OF STRUCTURE AND IN HIERARCHY OF FORMULIZATIONS: A concept of Supervenience suggests that each change in state at a higher level of structure or formulization must correspond to a change in lower level states. Supervenience would assert that a lower-level process uniquely determines the higher-level process. Thus there abides a “many-to-one mapping” between lower-level processes and higher-level processes. It seems that a discrete structure may supervene upon a continuous substratum, and, vice versa, a continuous structure may supervene upon a discrete substratum.
SUSSING THE IMMEASURABLE REAL: The Singular Unit-Packet seems to be necessarily existent, i.e., “real.” Yet, in itself, it is meta, i.e., not measurable. Yet, as applied with formulas, it produces derivative appearances, which are in some ways, measurable. They are not "completely measurable" in themselves, for they do not exist in themselves, but only relationally -- to a perspective, subject to a relational context, for some purpose of being formed to a record or sensation. Thus, appearances are relationally measurable, for qualitative purposes, not for a purpose of permanent recordation of truth about reality.
They are measurable in respect of formulas under a calculus which can be contrived to whatever the level of accuracy as may be desired, so long as the quality being thus quantified does not transpose across a fuzzy state of becoming, to phase shift to a nonlinearly different quality. May its interface be “sussed”?
CONCEPTUALIZING TO PRACTICAL PURPOSES: In respect of what conceptual scheme may one best and most consistently map measurable reality, while inspiring or identifying that which constitutes moral and meaningful conduct?
MATHEMATICAL THINGS: Regarding the ontology of mathematical physics: If the physical world objectively possesses a mathematical structure, then may it follow that it also possesses any substructure of that structure? Are there “mathematical things”?
MAPPING – SUPERVENIENCE -- NEWTONIAN GRID -- COORDINATE AND COEXTENSIVE MAPPING V. QUANTUM LEAPS AND RELATIVISTIC PHASE TRANSFORMATIONS:
A locally shared sub-formula may avail appearances of aspects of shared grid mapping. The appearance of sharing may be conservable in respect of an intermediate, sub-summing formula, such that all locally relativistic transformations are shared at a same rate, such that all so sharing would seem to retain the same grid reference for digitized measurements. A need may not arise for re-normalizing or adjusting comparisions between local and distant frames of reference, except as connective formulas may traverse between a local sub-formula and a distant application of an intermediate formula or shift in inertial frame.
THE SINGULAR UNIT-PACKET: A singular Unit, whose Identity is ITERATED numerously among indiscernibles, is perpetually availed to the functioning of every presently fluxing sub-formula.
Its Number of Vibrational Iterations is limited only by the number of its applications to sub-formulas. The number of such sub-formula applications is limited only by the Top Formula. All sub-formulas are subsumed under the Top Formula. As a conserving equation, the Top Formula has Two Sides. Does that implicate that it is digitally based?
UNIFICATION TO ONE: May Reconciling Stuff consist of a Singular Digit, Value, or Unit, which itself is immeasurable in size or mass, which has no size or mass, which in essential Identity is of the Number One, which is iterated for whatever number of applications may be apt, for application by all sub-formulas of the Top Formula?
Do Iterations of bubbles and vibrations of the Singular Unit not, upon their application, measure to ANNIHILATE or cancel one another, because they do not exist as measurable things?
Does the Quality of their application with sub-formulas avail Emergence of in-form-ation of plural fields, of organizations and vector orientations, the interfunctionings of which avail the recordation, experience, interpretation, and communication of such information? Do such Emergent fields and vector values (in respect of emergent qualities of revolution, rotation, roll, and spin) (linear direction and angular momentum) come to avail expression of Charges (positive and negative), gravity (mass), attraction, repulsion, bindingness, cancellation (annihilation of organizations), and quantum leaps (digitized correlations and polarized movements)?
Thus, do such Units, if they exist in themselves, not interact, because they are of One? Does the Singularity not interact with itself? However, do Vibrational Iterations of the Source Singular Unit, in respect and relation to sub-formulas that are organized in respect of such iterations, interfunction and interact? Do interactions of Organizations of iterations of in-FORM-ation avail all dimensional qualities of relative and relational formulization and measure --- such as exclusivity (spin), mass (rate of responsiveness to gravitational curvature), location (space), orientation (linear and angular momentum), vector (matter), polarity, charge, radiation, amplitude, intensity, reactivity, wavelength, wave frequency (energy), and comparative sequential compression (time)?
Do special, shared, and intermediate levels of Form-ulas avail shared cosmic cones of relationally balanced experience?
If there abides a "set number" of vibrational iterations of the Singular Unit, in respect of the shared cone of cosmic experience that is availed to us, then it would be in respect of the number of applications of the Singular Unit that are availed to all the sub-formulas that produce the appearance of our shared cone of experience.
The relational fluxing of the sub-formulas is guided and reconciled in respect of an innate capacity of digitally appreciative feedback between the Source of the Top Formula and the perspectives availed among the sub-formulas.
Thus, each iteration of the Unit is Innately Relational to all others, and all seem to be subject to a digitizing heirarchy of fluxing formulas, under a Top Formula Algorithm.
The function of the sub-formulas is to avail appearances … of measurable discretes and continuosities among appearances of relational and fluxing organizations.
QUESTION: May the Top Formula support a Character, either of superior consciousness or of primitive apprehension? For what Purpose may it Conserve or Guide? How does it receive and process Feedback from sub-formulas, without itself being changed? Does it change or learn? Does it have a channel for instantaneous feedback?
SUPERVENIENCE OF UNCHANGING CHANGER: May there be an Unchanging Changer? An Unchanging Top of the System of Heirarchical Formulas? May it have meta capacity to flux sub-formulas on each side of its equal sign, without the top-formula itself needing to be fluxed, in order to flux them?
EMBODIMENTS OF FORMULAS: Iterations of the Meta cannot, as themselves, not even in aggregate, be directly measured or weighed. Rather, such weights, charges, and masses of which they avail signification are all derivative of how their iterations are formula-ized, and therewith avail Emergence to significations of quanta, with qualities, some of which are sensed and some of which are measured.
HOW THE META AVAILS INSTANTANEOUS EXPRESSION TO THE QUALITIES AND QUANTITIES OF THE MORTALLY EXPERIENCEABLE:
When a measurable relationship dissipates or "winks out" into apparent immeasurable nothingness, the relationship simply recurs elsewhere, sort of like through a wormhole, but still subject to the System of Algorithmic Formulas. The Singular-Meta-Field-Unit may be modeled as being presently everywhere, to instantaneously blow and suck bubble-packets and vibrations along a circular loop, to recycle organizations of Sub-Perspectives of Will between the Potential and the Manifest. It is omnipresent to the manifest, omni-imaginative to the potential, and omnipotent to the possible, for such sequential exchanges among quantifiable segments as are possible within such formulas as it adopts. It is omnivorous of perspectives of experience. Its moral pursuits are based in feedback of empathy and evolution.
The potential of Iterations of the Source Unit to influence and effect measurable relationships is guided and constrained to a System Algorithm that is presented with the Source Unit.
AT WHAT LEVEL OF SUPERVENIENCE OR DERIVATION DO ITERATIONS OF THE SOURCE UNIT EXIST? ARE THEY IMMEASURABLE, EXCEPT IN RESPECT OF INTERFACE WITH THEIR EMBODIMENT OF FORMULAIC INTERFUNCTIONINGS?
There seems little point to imagining all the Iterations of Units, in themselves, being collapsed into a small space, or even into a Singular Unit or Black Hole.
Regardless of proportionality in any collapse, the units being, in themselves, sizeless and massless, would not be meaningfully measured or conceptualized to have collapsed.
What is meaningful is only how they are relatively (and digitally?) deployed, supervened under the System Algorithm (Top Formula), for giving expression to sub-algorithms. Under such formulaic deployment, expression is given to exclusivity, vibration, frequency, reinforcement, interference, entanglement, alignment, directional vector, angular momentum, spin, charge, neutralization, and annihilation. It is not the meta-vibrations of iterations that are signified, but the INTERFACE effect of such vibrations taking on the signification to give expression to formulas.
In themselves, the iterations of units would not collapse into a Single Unit, unless all Perspectives of Consciousness were also collapsed into a Single Perspective. Were a single unit (as quick as math) the SAME UNIT, as a Single Identity of Indiscernibles, it could apply itself, digitally, to function as a placeholder, to flesh out (word made flesh) all apparent substance, so as to make relational formulations and organizations mathematically measurable in severalty, subject to perspective, context, and purpose. Each iteration of perspective would be dormant, while its formulative definition were unfilled, during which sequencing break it would be without capacity to notice that its experience of apparent continuity was really based in digitality.
CRACKED SYMMETRY – RELATIVISTIC SIGNIFICATION – FORMULIZATION REQUIRES SEPARATION OF PRESENTATION OF UNITY (HOLISM) IN COORDINATE ASPECTS (RELATIVISTIC PARTICULARS): If meta (real) units were in themselves aligned in perfect meta symmetry (property-less, sizeless, massless, directionless, chargeless, spinless, and indiscernible), then how, in relativity, could any sensed or recorded SIGNIFICATION or thing be relationally measured to orbit, radiate, emit a charge, traverse a distance, respond to gravity, or be tested to have organized? Such could not occur were such units, in themselves and by themselves, the fill of Reality. Some additional factor or aspect would need to avail such Units to assume such relational organizations, Aspects, and coordinate Properties (cracked symmetry) as would avail interpretations, sensations, and recordations of Information concerning measurable functions (such as relative weight, charge, size, direction, speed, revolution, rotation, and roll. Until some device or Formula were applied to crack symmetry and separate the fundamental Singularity into varying Aspects of presentation, in order to Mediate, Interface, and relate among them, to give expression and signification to a measurable Organization or form of comparable size and mass, then there would be nothing and no basis that could be said to have capacity to measure them or their organization --- such as for weight, charge, size, direction, speed, revolution, rotation, or roll.
RELATIVISTIC CONSTANTS: When one Thing (immeasurable in itself) parcels and presents itself in different Aspects or Phases or Properties, and such aspects are required to relate to one another in ways that obey relativistically constant formulas, then such Aspects may sense and measure their relational contexts by empirical reference to coordinately mapped changes among their contextual constituents. Thus, the Universe may be immeasurable as one substance (no mortal can measure time, space, or matter before the Big Bang), yet, after the Big Bang from Cracked Symmetry, be measurable in respect of the possible mixes of Aspects that it can present.
SYMMETRY: If the only Source Unit were propertyless and sizeless, then summing indiscernible iterations would not add size. Thus, it would seem meaningless to speculate on any possible effect of any simultaneously proportionate expansion or contraction of all indiscernible iterations of such Unit. So how may any iteration of any such unit be conserved to move, push, pull, attract, repel, organize, or bind in respect of any other? Well, Symmetry would have to be cracked, so that iterations became irregular and discernible. Once symmetry were cracked, so that vibrations and iterations of the Source Unit became discernible, then how may such Iterations of units be formul-ized and imag-ed, to organize and obey conservational relationships representable in formulas, based on values assigned to vectors and fields in math? How may such irregularly iterative representations be formalized to convey locally perspectivistic information, that could be interpreted to Wilful and sensory experiences of pressure, picture, color, vibration, and chemical flavor?
PARTICULAR SUBDIVISION NECESSITATES DISCERNIBILITY: Formulas for organizations that can be fluxed to re-pre-sent the conservation and impression of sensate information to our experience and memories must somehow be interfaced, associated, and bonded with Iterations of Aspects of the ultimate Unit of Reality. What would happen were all irregularity in such vibrational iterations to smooth and dissipate out? Then, it would seem such Iterations would revert to perfect indiscernibility and re-absorption into the Singular Source Unit.
PARTICULAR SUBDIVISION NECESSITATES DISCERNIBILITY: Formulas for organizations that can be fluxed to re-pre-sent the conservation and impression of sensate information to our experience and memories must somehow be interfaced, associated, and bonded with Iterations of Aspects of the ultimate Unit of Reality. What would happen were all irregularity in such vibrational iterations to smooth and dissipate out? Then, it would seem such Iterations would revert to perfect indiscernibility and re-absorption into the Singular Source Unit.
SUPERVENIENCE OF LEVELS OF FORMULAS: So long as vibrational iterations retain aspects of discernibility, then they may be subject to complex re-organizations in respect of their properties of differentiation. What would avail them to represent qualities of measurably discernible difference would abide with the organization of such units in respect of locally relative frames of reference. Thus, the Source Unit would avail such organizations to be fluxed in obedience to predetermined and contemporaneously determined hierarchies or systems of formulas. Such formulas must entail means for representing and conveying expression of relationally discernible, vibrationally imperfect, iterations of the Source Unit. Otherwise, such units would remain without meaningful or measurable existentiality. Expression via such formulas must entail means of inform-ational recordation and apprehension among such various relativistic and reconciled perspectives as are locally coterminous with our shared state of affairs.
FORMULAS AT INCEPTION OF DISCERNIBILITY: Thus, the formulas and the aspects of vibrational iterations emerge into contemporaneous existentiality, secondary to cracked symmetry. But for their contextually conservational relation, the formulas and the units of imperfect iterations which they rule, would neither of them have size, mass, charge, direction, or purpose. Yet, taken together, their interfunctioning communicates informational expressions of mass. Thus, vibrationally imperfect iterations of the Source Unit associate with the inception of fundamental aspects, i.e., derivative units that are associated with dynamic formulas for defining organizations, translations, and measurables.
DIGITAL DISCRETES: Each alteration on one side of a formula entails a simultaneous, conservational, dualistic, quantum jump (exchange) on the other side of that level of formula. Thus, vectors of revolutions, rotations, and rolls appear to be derivative of discrete quantum leaps, which are controlled by whatever the Reconciling Source that actuates and guides parameters for the unfoldments that are made subject to such system of conserving formulas. Thus, information appears to be exchanged in discrete bits, in a way that correlates and renormalizes so as to sponsor locally qualitative expectations and interpretations of unfolding continuosities in space and time.
&&&&&&
FINAL MODEL: What is desired is an internally consistent, math-based conceptualization for how space and time are digitally contracted and expanded to whatever the level of accuracy as may be needed for whatever the point of view in order for perceptions and recordations of information to be calculably renormalized to every inertial frame of relativistic reference for every sequence, locus, and acceleration that is possible to be formally and formulaically represented and experienced in space-time. Could a Meta Being or Creator ever have“stood outside” the cosmos in such a way as to represent the cosmos, as a whole, as only a sizeless, massless, directionless, spinless point, like an iterative grain of sand, that needs little more than Meta Imagination and Math in order to divide it into an infinity of possible sequences of relativistic frames of inertial representations and experiences of forms and formulas?
NOTE: To argue for an objective collapse of a wave function into a particle is to argue for an objective thing in itself, rather than a relational entailment. Always bear in mind the relational entailment between point of view, framework of reference, and identifiable iteration of will with purpose of interpretation.
Imagine meta FORMS expressing mathematical relations among themselves, in FORMULAS, whose forms carry arms of random vibrations, which clump, randomly at first, but later evolving into complex patterns of iteratives and fractals, leading to temporal sustainability of such complex FORMS as happen to be best suited to endure and replicate. As a sum of parts, such clumps would also act randomly. However, as ORGANIZATIONS and organisms, their wholes would compete and cooperate as wholes, more than merely as sums of parts. As wholes, a kind of directing, subconscious Will would EMERGE with them, like a Will to preserve and propagate themselves. As organizations, SENSES would tend to associate with them, for availing them to interpret and respond to Information concerning aids and threats to their continuance. Such senses would develop means to represent, store, convey, transmit, receive, download, interpret, and conceptualize data, i.e., INFORMATION. For example, each light wave, upon reflecting from an organization of mass, would have its Information (wavelength) thereby affected. Such change in wavelength would be representative of data regarding the severable packet or Event of the reflection. Were an object, such as a Retina, capable of receiving and interpreting a transmission of the data, there would be an exchange of INFORMATION. A retina connected to a Brain for directing impulses as a result of receipt of data may evolve to have an advantage for preserving itself over organizations lacking such a retina connected to an impulse firing brain. Thus, conscious, directing WILL may eventually emerge out of competition and cooperation among evolving modes and ORGANISMS of FORMS for conveying INFORMATION. Thus, RANDOM conveyances of information would lead to contemporaneously organized, unconsciously directed, and WILLED usages of information, in order to sustain, empower, and replicate the organization/organism. As information began to organize information, organizations would begin to inform organizations. Complex, higher level abstractions of information and organization would lead to organisms of CONSCIOUS WILL. Thus, Complex Will would interfunction and/or evolve with chaos, not from chaos. That is, organization of sense receptive brains would evolve in respect of complex relationships among parts and wholes, components and organizations. Potential for expression of complex Will would be inherent and innate to the chaos of the cosmos.
Thus, Consciousness would emerge and propagate itself in respect of competition and cooperation among organizations and organisms. Such consciousness would emerge to express capacity for collapsing and directing the data that is carried and communicated with all electromagnetic and other data-carrying waves. A collapse of data from a light wave may be interpreted by a contemporaneously conscious or interpreting recipient or recorder as a collapse of the light wave into an informationally digital or quantum-based form of data transference, i.e., a photon or wave-packet. Thus, data would be made subject to DIGITAL exchange and feedback.
ORGANIZATION OF RETINAS: IS THERE SOMETHNG SPECIAL ABOUT THE EVOLUTION OF OBSERVERS’ RETINAS, WHICH ALLOWS THEM TO COLLAPSE AND REFLECT LIGHT WAVES? From wikipedia: “The molecular transition of retinal C20H28O, which is responsible for vision, as discovered in 1958 by Nobel laureate biochemist George Wald and co-workers. The absorption provokes a cis-trans isomerization that, in combination with other such transitions, is transduced into nerve impulses. The absorption of photons can even break chemical bonds, as in the photodissociation of chlorine; this is the subject of photochemistry.”
OBSERVER EFFECT ---RENORMALIZATION OF SEGMENTAL EXCHANGES OF NON-SYMMETRICAL INFORMATION: Checking tire pressure is an example of observer effect: it is difficult to do without leaking out some of the air, thus changing the pressure.. Thus, forms of superpositions of Information are often leaked into the wider environment, beyond the realm of measurement. When dealing with very small objects, as in quantum mechanics, it may not be possible to observe a system without changing it, so that the observer must be considered part of the system being observed.
ORGANIZED MASS: Conversion of matter to energy signifies as acceleration, which distorts local clumps of organizational vibrations of Will. Organizations of clumps of Will can express relative Matter (noun) -- to be accelerated, or relative Energy (verb), -- to do the acceleration. Expenditure of energy disrupts the local inertial frame, puts drag or compression on the inertial frame, and stretches or compresses it. Momentum of an inertial frame may be increased --- either when captured by a faster inertial frame, or as organized vibrations of matter and energy reinforce its vector.
RATE OF CURVATURE: Clumps of matter and energy mark a local area where organized clumps of vibrating Will have curved space-time. The local rate of such curvature is called gravity, or a gravity well, or a disturbance in space-time, like a trampoline with a mass of matter and energy in its center that marks its curvature. The greater the curvature, the greater the “pull” on nearby clumps of matter. Once sharing a common center for an inertial frame, all nearby organized clumps that have mass will tend to accelerate in respect of a same center of curvature at the same rate. Light is massless, and, in particular state, it is not organized about any internality of itself, since its photons are also sizeless. It does not accelerate in respect of any local center of gravity. Rather, it simply follows the rate of local curvature, at a constant speed. If the rate of local curvature is high enough, as in the case of a black hole, then light may not escape. More likely, the light is simply slightly bent along the local rate of curvature as it proceeds through at its constant speed.
PHOTONS ARE MASSLESS CONVEYERS OF ENERGY: Photons signify discrete, wave-packet carriers of electromagnetic force. The force (energy and momentum) they signify and impart is related to quanticized changes in frequency, or, inversely, wavelength. A vectored direction of a wave-packet, with angular momentum (rotational analog of linear momentum), entails a signification of dipolarity. A photon that signifies a directional vector along a rate of curvature of space-time will entail a magnetic moment, or charge, in digital respect of its quantum of directional frequency. Thus, electromagnetic radiation seems to entail vibrating iterations of Will at a most basic level, such that it does not constitute mass in itself, yet does signify impartation of energy. Thus, electromagnetic radiation follows such local space-time rates of curvature as happen to be most formulaically coordinate with its constant relational speed. Since light has no carry mass, it is always accelerated to its maximum, constant speed, instantaneously, as a function of formulaic design, between and across different inertial frames.
INERTIAL SLING SHOTING OF ORGANIZED MASSES: Organized Mass can be accelerated or decelerated without expenditure of energy, merely by following an inertial path, such that it is captured by a series of different inertial frames of reference. It may be decelerated when it travels between competing inertial frames. Although there is no absolute reference for acceleration or deceleration, no body in relation to any other body in any inertial frame can be signified to exceed the limiting speed of light. In relation to various, more organized, bodies of mass, such as airplanes, a single plane may be accelerating and decelerating, simultaneously, at a number of different rates. That is, a center of gravitational rate of acceleration would depend on the vector of the locally relational center of gravity (inertial frame). Within a system that has a center of gravity, subcomponents will renormalize to it. Separation in space-time may make the same inertial frames remain below a threshold of quantifiably measurable signification or experience. Depending on purpose, perspective, and context, those inertial systems that are beyond one’s practical center of gravity may be of de minimus, if any, measurable effect. The limiting speed of bosons (such as photons and gravitons) signifies a renormalizing function. Thus, measures taken by any observer of relations with any other inertial frame, for comparing effects of rates of curvature in space-time as marked by centers of local masses, would always be frame-dragged to whatever extent needed for renormalization. That is, careful measurements by observers would always follow formulas based on referential centers of gravity.
QUANTICIZED WAVE PACKET EXCHANGES: Relative mass densities mark relative increases in space-time curvature. Travel along an inertial space-time curvature does not require expenditure of energy. It is “frictionless.” Acceleration may be increased or decreased, as the center of gravity changes with travel among inertial frames. Acceleration may lead to capture by a different inertial frame. Capture (as of asteroids) can happen, even without an expenditure of energy. Light can be captured towards an inertial frame (or a black hole), without an expenditure of energy. Thus, light can travel among inertial frames, without expending energy. However, when light (electromagnetic energy) refracts with organized masses, energy can be transferred. When light quanta transmit energy, such transmissions are quanticized. Thus, discrete, quanticized changes are simultaneously signified in respect of wave collapses or wavelength changes.
TWIN PARADOX: Twins may experience a same mathematical total of experiential information, but comprised of differently renormalized subtotals of segmented separations, sequences, wavelengths, and informational representations of space and time. One may grow more experienced in relative distance traversed, the other in time experienced. One may consume and expend much more bodily energy to live day to day, while the other may rely mainly on rocket and machine energy. One may remain in a relatively stable inertial frame, while the other traverses through considerably different inertial frames. Each may experience different wavelengths and frequencies of gravitational curvatures of space-time packets. As electromagnetic energy comes in wave-particle packets, gravitational energy may come in space-time packets. As frequency is inversely related to wavelength, so may segments of space be inversely related to sequences of time. Thus, the comparative experiences of twins may not be comparable as continuosities, but only as renormalized exchanges of packets of space and time. Ten light years worth of experiences of gear quantas for one may have to be meshed or renormalized to eight light years worth for the other. Some segments, packets, wavelengths, orbits, spins, or gears for one may have to mesh, compress, or fall out of the other’s cone of experience. Thus, space or time may be compressed or expanded for differently for each particularly organized perspective of Will, depending on its program of acceleration in relation to whatever the relative series of inertial frames it may encounter, i.e., the curve of its vectored experience of acceleration in relation to the center and rate of gravitational curvature for its cone of experience.
An outbound twin riding a directional first wave may be subject to a series of following, reinforcing waves of information going its way. The following, reinforcing waves will be segmentally renormalized to its perspective. The renormalization will in part be as amplitude reinforcement to information already being carried, and in part as renormalization of incoming information. When such outbound twin-wave reflects, reverses, and turns its relative direction back, the wave-packets that had been following it, that it then encounters, will be encountered at increased frequency. However, not all will be encountered. Some will be renormalized to “pass by.” Some of the information about atomic and bodily orbits will be lost, and what remains will be received, interpreted, and rationalized differently than it otherwise would have been. When a traveling twin turns around, more of the incoming light waves would be interpreted as separate, yet more frequent, waves. Such wave packets would be received at shortened wavelengths and increased frequencies. And, during the turnaround, some of the wave packets will have passed through, before the reverse is started. The separate quanta of information in those wave-packets will be lost.
COMMUNICATIONS AMONG MORTALS: Mortal perspectives bind with imperfect clumps of organized iterations of a Source Will. Communication among such imperfect perspectives of consciousness is not instantaneous. Information must be mathematically organized in sequences and shapes (geometries of time and space), copied into wavelength changes, transmitted by emissions of electromagnetic radiations, such as of light, renormalized to changed inertial frames, received by retinas, perceived by brains, conceptualized by contextual experience, and then recorded for reference and feedback.
OVERLAPPING DELAYS IN SEQUENCES OF INFORMATIONAL FEEDBACK: These processes overlap among math based sequences in space-time. Some feedback is nearly instantaneous. Example: collapse of wavelength to photon, impinging on retina, triggering nerve receptor impulse. Other feedback must be processed through organizations and organisms. It may be stored, conceptualized, analyzed, compared, and only then may a feedback response be directed. Feedback that can be considered the feedback of the organism is delayed during the sequences the organism needs to process information as an organism.
CONSERVATIONAL INSTANTANEITY: Simple electrical stimulus and electrical response tend to be nearly instantaneous. Organized stimulus and response, unless running in parallel, not so. Yet, feedback is always renormalized in respect of choirs of representations of representations of the Singular Unit, so that, at some level, beyond communications among mortals, system conserving feedback is instantaneous.
ITERATIVE CHOIRS OF DELEGATES OF WILL: Relations in space-time do not manifest in themselves, but only in respect of relational, and mathematical renormalization to the recorded potential experienceability of perspectives of Will. As math is fleshed out by Will, then Will, in sum, is equal to all potentiality. May there abide higher levels of renormalizing empathies (choirs of angels?) among iterative types of organizations of Will? What about Will as Source Holism of iterative choirs of delegates?
CHOIRS OF MEDIATION: Are there choirs of mediating, meta perspectives and contexts? Angels? Are they availed of instantaneous, meta channels?
Will itself is of the Here and Now (the perpetual Present), yet Will’s Vibrations present the context that avails the accumulation and transmission of Information in Space-Time.
Formulaic Emergence of Consciousness: Consciousness emerges with vibrating hums of Forms constrained to Formulas, with which exchange are made of feedback of dimensional analysis, thus to represent constant reFormulizations and reorganizations of priorities of sense-taking focus and apprehension. "I" am a sense-taking and back-feeding Form for prioritizing Formulizations of Formulas.
What is IT that is vibrating, to give definition to the Source Unit and its Field? It is Will itself, generating waves of will, discretely expressed as packeted units of quanta, giving definition to numbers and formulas, i.e., Math itself.
The Source Unit is the UNCHANGING aspect of Will.
The wave packets, in their organization, are the CHANGING aspect. The vibrations of will are transubstantiated into quanticized wave packets of will, evolving into complex organizations for giving expression to will.
START &&&&&
META DIGITS APPLIED TO META FORMULAS, AND FLUXED TO YIELD A QUALITY OF META APPREHENSION:
DIGITAL BASED SYSTEM OF ALGORITHMS, SUBJECT TO FEEDBACK-CONSCIOUS GUIDE:
Overlapping channels of presentment and determination and sensateness and perception
Math of math of math
Consciousness of consciousness of consciousness
Information of information of information
Iterative repetitive projection of limited kinds of things –organons and organizations of organizations of organizations.
Meta vibrations tending to select formulas for the projection of iterations separated in levels and sequences of iterations
Come to an intermediary consistent map of reality via algorithmic analysis.
The Top Formula has access to the potentiality of our qualities of consciousness through it.
Here is represented my leap of faith.
Formulas
God
/ \
Potentiality \
Shared cone of experience
/ \
Mortal observers Angels
/ \ \
Humanity other mortals all appearances relatively reconciled
?????Why should angels derive of God, but contrive man to rise from bacteria?
Are sub-formulas the top formulas of previous iterations, reduced to relativistic comparison by the accumulation of Information for the Field?
Field of qualitative organizations of preceding iterations of the vibrating unit.
Fluxing qualitative of measurable quantitatives
Conservationally iterative accumulations of formulaic interfunctionings.
Vibration – active mumerosity
Field – iterated formulations
Unit – iterable form
Chutzpah – the regime puppeteers the administration that does the evil, then says the evil is the administration’s fault, then says the regime needs to stay in power so it can stop the evil.
Hierarchy of formulas
So then, did god first spawn the Angels, then they bacteria, then us?
> \/
I /\ /\
I / \/ \>
If my “hypothesis” is correct, then nearly every kind of relationship that can be imagined, which is not a direct contradiction, would seem amenable of being coaxed into expressible and measurable manifestation in some frame of reference, shared cone of experience, or alternative cosmos.
INCEPTION
a dead, alternative, world of Potentiality.
Would the introduction of a single perspective of consciousness then “collapse” the entire potentiality into measurable manifestation?
To be a unit, it must conserve and vibrate, as a unit, and communicate itself in vibrational projections of iterations.
Its existence entails its adoption with such a Top Formula.
Truth bu definition, i.e., a mathematical truth.
What A Priori Truths may define, constrain, or empower God, or the originating Source of each organizing, relational determinism?
1. Top organization: singular unit , meta field of vibrations, tendencies to cyclical translatable recordable representative informative manifestations out of potentialities
2. Intermediate organizations
Math geometry sequence form signification
3. Sub organizations - iterations organized in respect of mathematical geometrical and sequential relationships
What A Priori Truths may define, constrain, or empower God, or the originating Source of each organizing, relational determinism?
1. Top organization: singular unit , meta field of vibrations, tendencies to cyclical translatable recordable representative informative manifestations out of potentialities
2. Intermediate organizations
Math geometry sequence form signification
3. Sub organizations - iterations organized in respect of mathematical geometrical and sequential relationships
Spin charge binding reactivity radiation
E=mc2d
G
Speed of light
Stme translational particles fields
4. Representations of representations
Sub sub organizations - relational sensation perception conception
Perspectives of consciousness
Qualities of empathetic feedback
Representations of reps of reps
5. The Cloud
6. Cyclic repeat
Vibrating iterations that obey
@@@@@@
To avail the most fundamental formulas for organizing sensations perceptions conceptions?
Does EMR bombardment eventually knock particles loose, to avail them to radiate?
Translations of particular organizations For expressing energy for expressing matter for expressing EMR.
Bindingness and reactiveness
What a priori constants associate with the singular unit and its field of vibrations?
Space time mathmath of geometry
E=mc2d
G
Speed of light
Stme translational particles fields
4. Representations of representations
Sub sub organizations - relational sensation perception conception
Perspectives of consciousness
Qualities of empathetic feedback
Representations of reps of reps
5. The Cloud
6. Cyclic repeat
Vibrating iterations that obey
@@@@@@
To avail the most fundamental formulas for organizing sensations perceptions conceptions?
Does EMR bombardment eventually knock particles loose, to avail them to radiate?
Translations of particular organizations For expressing energy for expressing matter for expressing EMR.
Bindingness and reactiveness
What a priori constants associate with the singular unit and its field of vibrations?
Space time mathmath of geometry
&&&&&&&&&&&
OF WILL, PURPOSE, MORALITY, AND RECONCILIATION:
WHAT ABIDES AS INNATE TO EXISTENTIALITY: WILL is innate, as are perspectives of will, as is meta empathy among such perspectives of will as are in inherent competition and cooperation, to surpass along the unfoldment of evolution. A reasoned idea of moral empathy needs to factor the innate need of perspectives of will to pursue and communicate surpassing unfoldments of evolution. Because surpassage is part of our inherent condition of beingness, there is no set, linear end, final objective for any formulation of moral purposefulness. The teleology appears to be for perpetual seeking, not for end times finding.
UNFOLDING EXPRESSIONS OF MORAL CHOICES: Each adoption of an avatar or perspective of will rationalizes and feeds back, through its centrally organized processing unit (cpu), i.e., brain. The Field wills an organized, focused action by an organism, whose brain then coordinates an organized rationalization, as if the brain had been first to intend an action of signification, rather than the Field having intended the brain. Morality has to reconcile with the unfolding evolution of expressions of competing and cooperating perspectives of will. Morality reconciles unfoldments of ego, empathy, and evolution. The Rule of Morality: The principle that should be a categorical imperative, a moral law of all signification, is a qualitatively subjective one: Be Empathetic!
UNFOLDING EXPRESSIONS OF MORAL CHOICES: Each adoption of an avatar or perspective of will rationalizes and feeds back, through its centrally organized processing unit (cpu), i.e., brain. The Field wills an organized, focused action by an organism, whose brain then coordinates an organized rationalization, as if the brain had been first to intend an action of signification, rather than the Field having intended the brain. Morality has to reconcile with the unfolding evolution of expressions of competing and cooperating perspectives of will. Morality reconciles unfoldments of ego, empathy, and evolution. The Rule of Morality: The principle that should be a categorical imperative, a moral law of all signification, is a qualitatively subjective one: Be Empathetic!
INNATE MORALITY: Morality is as categorically innate and unavoidable as God. We propose and make temporal judgments and feedback. We care, even as we kill. Manmade laws are only temporal aids to practice, as crutches and helpmates along the path of our beingness. By our apprehensions and actions, we "vote," as we deem that which is Good v. Evil. Our votes are factored, hence, our evaluations color the qualitatives of reality. In that relation, good and evil are derivatively real. God reconciles. I would differ from Kant, in that I see necessary evolution as not being categorically or necessarily moral. To say what seems to be fair now is often to fail to weigh or speculate what may be fair were alternatives to come to pass, upon a sacrifice of the now.
INNATE INCOMPLETENESS OF RATIONALIZATIONS OF SETTINGS: Set theory can never be complete in accounting for all phenomena, because each newly organized signification that encompasses a set must simultaneously give expression to the organization as a whole, therewith rendering the whole as something greater than the sum of its parts. That is the way and will of the world. The Field that wills to present an organization, as an organization, simultaneously harbors the will to manifest, represent, and record information for potentializing the qualitative interpretation of expressionism that will unfold in respect of the organization.
UNFOLDING ADEQUACY: Will is always adequate to the qualitative expression of each new organization because no new organization can emerge without the merging bond of will, whether as perspective or as potentializing potentate.
INCOMPLETENESS OF NON-TRIVIAL TRUTHS: The truth availed to mortals seems to be uncertain incompleteness about whether a truth about the original, perpetual, permanent, existential emergence of consciousness may be available to any consciousness, much less to mortal or human consciousness.
MEANING OF WILL: Will, as iterative of tendencies from vibrations and observers. Will, as innate capacity to appreciate. Will, as innate drive to focus, adopt, identify, appreciate, and change.
UNFOLDING ADEQUACY: Will is always adequate to the qualitative expression of each new organization because no new organization can emerge without the merging bond of will, whether as perspective or as potentializing potentate.
INCOMPLETENESS OF NON-TRIVIAL TRUTHS: The truth availed to mortals seems to be uncertain incompleteness about whether a truth about the original, perpetual, permanent, existential emergence of consciousness may be available to any consciousness, much less to mortal or human consciousness.
MEANING OF WILL: Will, as iterative of tendencies from vibrations and observers. Will, as innate capacity to appreciate. Will, as innate drive to focus, adopt, identify, appreciate, and change.
BIRTH: Original sin -- limitation that necessarily accompanies the adoption of an identity of self, i.e., a perspective of will. Without such "sin," we would have no severable perspective of being. Without such "sin," God would lack our feedback and company. LIFE: Dignity and morality -- moral beings as ends, worthy of empathy, not merely means! Strive to be worthy of beingness. DEATH: Salvation-- sublimation and reasbsorption of particular perspectives of will, in preparation for potential recycling or reincarnation.
WILL TO POWER tends to be redundant of will, which, by definition, seeks power, either for a perspective which it has adopted for experiencing consciousness of itself, or for a perspective, organism, or organization to whose purpose it seeks to devote and sacrifice itself. Will wants to pursue a receding idealization, not to capture a final, end-of-times stagnation. Cosmic possibilities for qualities, quantities, and combinations of meta digitized vibrations of will are INFINITE, such that the cosmos seems to be as beyond rationalizable repetition as are patterns of numbers in the calculation of pi. May the COSMIC MIND have capacity to delete memories and information, without necessarily having eternally to repeat patterns for their expression?
NO MATTER, NEVER MIND: Meta vibrations of will produce holons and organizations encompassing parts. An organism may organize interpretations of Phenomena of sensations, derivative of relations among relations, among representations of representations. Thus, Iterations of will bind with that which avails the manifestation of organizations of parts, interfunctioning with organizations of parts. Thus, there abides a Quality with which an Organization potentializes more than a mere Summation of its Parts, with ever emerging traces of significations of Will, as Will perpetually merges and emerges, in its particularized and quanticized severances of expressionism.
Thus, the organization of a system adds a Quality to the Quantitative Sum of the parts to its set. Thus, Infinity is charged with potential for relationships to be experienced among charges and perspectives of Will.
CLUMPING: As vibrations of Will clump and focusPerspectives, the potential for relations between and among such vibrations and perspectives charges a field of space-time, that is Derivatively Expressed all around and in respect of them.
NO VACUUM: Thus, the field, derivative and in respect of vibrations and perspectives, is not really a vacuum. Rather, it is charged in potentiality. However, it is charged so minutely as to be Beyond Individual Measure of such charges.
Thus, POTENTIALITY would CHARGE the field, the vibrating clumpings, and the singular unit, such that iterations upon iterations would generally be repulsed and attracted, outbound from the Singular Unit. The Unit and its Field would seem to have no particular locus in space-time, for space-time may not even exist, except in relational respect of the Singular Unit and its Field.
NO PRIVILEGED UP OR DOWN: Thus, no particular Iteration would be privileged to know which way was up or down, expanding or contracting. What would seem to be apparent to and from any particular Iteration would be that particulars away from it would seem to be relatively accelerating in distance. However, this appearance would be the same, regardless of whether all matter were accelerating outbound while proportionately expanding, or whether all matter were accelerating inbound while proportionately contracting. Either way, at some point along the acceleration, an iteration would seem either to dissipate or to contract, to such a phase-shifting point as no longer to support a perspective of consciousness in respect of it that could be apart from that of the Singular Unit.
ROTATION AS REFERENTIAL BASIS FOR GRIDDING: However, if a Point of Origination for a Universal Bubble is assumed, then it would seem odd if all that seems relationally to be further outbound were sensed as rotating clockwise, while all that seemed further inbound were sensed as rotating counterclockwise. Would such be internally consistent with a generally outbound expansion from a common point of origin? No. The increasing acceleration could still be attributed either to increased outbound acceleration or increased inbound contraction. So then, could such odd observation of rotational tendencies, in connection with differentials in red shifts in electromagnetic radiation, provide a referential basis for gridding one's relative locus in respect of a presumed common point of origin? No. The shift would be to the red, either way, and the CAUSE of the differential could still not be known to be because of acceleration outbound or inbound, assuming compensatory proportionate expansion or contraction among all forms of mathematical expression.
SIZE IN ITSELF: In itself, as a whole, the Singular Unit and its Field and collection of clumps of dissipating and replacing Vibrations, is SIZELESS. In relationships among the Unit, Field, and iterations of Vibrations, interfunctionings are measurable. However, such measures cannot be Mathematically pinned to a Grid in respect of an unchanging or Favored Point in Space-Time.
TRIVIAL TRUTHS: Many truths are merely tautologies, truisms, made true by triviality of definition or direct intuition. Such as truths in mathematics. Some trivial truths: A is A; definition is definition; identity is identity; present is present; one is one; two plus two is four; will is will; consciousness is consciousness; relationship is relationship; vibration is vibration; formation is formation; information is information; potentiality is potentiality; conservation is conservation; feedback is feedback; phase shift is phase shift; transition is transition; reconciliation is reconciliation; cycle is cycle; system is system; being is being.
MISCELLANEOUS:
PRAGMATIC TEST --- A pragmatic test for a philosophy: What would be the results of an actual practice of the philosophy, with regard to practical issues and interests of a culture or humanity?
DIGITALITY allows the whole to receive severable impressions and variously reconciled conceptualizations.
SHARED CONE: The same information, design, or piece of art is presented, sensed, conceptualized and related differently to every perspective within a shared conceptual cone. Yet, they all share the same holism of Identity, albeit, from different creative perspectives.
SHARED POWER: None of the particular perspectives of consciousness has power in itself to effect a meta choice that woujld limit the whole, except as creatively and self fulfillingly made and reconciled by and to the Holism.
INFINITE QUALITATIVE POTENTIAL: Each different perspective or standpoint within the whole yields a potentially infinite variability of impressions to be fed back to the whole.
CONSCIOUSNESS: Consciousness is information representing and experiencing itself, as if in a stream of digitized feedback of constant ebb and flow, exchanging, communicating, substituting, and dimensionally analyzing.
START !!!START!!!
The Superior Unit abides as an un-mixable vibration of a unit of a field, which conserves and iterates relational and transitional mixes.
It avails severable experiences derivative of an inseverable holism.
The model/concept of unit/vibration/field can be considered from a standpoint offering a meta basis fir interrelationally measurable Substance, or recordable Information, or presently experienceable Conscious Will.
Unconsciousness of consciousness
Unconsciousness of unconsciousness of consciousness
Consciousness
Consciousness of consciousness
Consciousness of consciousness of consciousness
It is not an explanation of truth, but a model for a way of pursuing truth. A model that is hoped to be as least metaphysically postulative and most internally consistent as possible. A model for synthesizing other models, with no cost to their rigor, and they may lead to insights for hypothecating submodels of more practical application, testability, and falsifiability. A model that guides mores, even in respect of surpassage of evolution. That is, Be empathetic! A model that pierces conceits of naming biological units as having perpetually separate identities or souls of consciousness. A model that pierces a notion of soul of original sin and potential eternal salvation.
The problem with falsifiability as a test is: we already intuit that any model that purports to be a precise and complete map of non-trivial truth is false, per Godel. And, a model may be incomplete or impractical for some purposes, het highly practical for others. For most earthbound technologies, Newtonian concepts about physics work quite well. If a no -trivial idea, concept, model, or formula could not be true unless it could be false (falsifiable), then it could never be completely true.
Unconsciousness of consciousness
Unconsciousness of unconsciousness of consciousness
Consciousness
Consciousness of consciousness
Consciousness of consciousness of consciousness
It is not an explanation of truth, but a model for a way of pursuing truth. A model that is hoped to be as least metaphysically postulative and most internally consistent as possible. A model for synthesizing other models, with no cost to their rigor, and they may lead to insights for hypothecating submodels of more practical application, testability, and falsifiability. A model that guides mores, even in respect of surpassage of evolution. That is, Be empathetic! A model that pierces conceits of naming biological units as having perpetually separate identities or souls of consciousness. A model that pierces a notion of soul of original sin and potential eternal salvation.
The problem with falsifiability as a test is: we already intuit that any model that purports to be a precise and complete map of non-trivial truth is false, per Godel. And, a model may be incomplete or impractical for some purposes, het highly practical for others. For most earthbound technologies, Newtonian concepts about physics work quite well. If a no -trivial idea, concept, model, or formula could not be true unless it could be false (falsifiable), then it could never be completely true.
Pb. If the direction of wave vibration is always expanding outbound, then it could not convey feedback information to be recorded, learned, or accessed at its source.
Any reconciliation then need not be of will or conscious apprehension, but only of outbound wave mechanics.
So how can my conceptual model of a singular unit sending iterative vibrations outbound into a vacuum field of eventual dissipation support any concept of conscious participation in reconciliation of the perpetual present?
Well:
The concept is that the outbound waves never lose "entelechy," but dissipate as their intensity trades out to acceleration. As the outbound acceleration reaches a point such that no vibration remains, the vacuum of the field replenishes to call forth another vibration from the singular unit.
In one respect, the sequence between outbound waves is digitally durational.
In another respect, the present relationship between the singular unit and its field is instantaneous. Each area of vibration and vacuum is contemporaneously correlative.
Moreover, what is being waved outbound is not consisted merely of waves of mechanism, but iterative waves of Will, which combine in constructive and destructive clumps of interference, to produce organizations of Will.
As clumps enlarge and multiply, their organizations begin to exhibit properties of mass, density, push, pull, charge, spin, polarity, radiation, attachment, connection, reflection, and feedback.
At levels of holism, there may abide means of instantaneous communication and expericnce of the present as the present.
Dark matter: cilia like clumps of vibrations that have not yet clumped enough to be meaningfully measurable in effect except in bulk
Any reconciliation then need not be of will or conscious apprehension, but only of outbound wave mechanics.
So how can my conceptual model of a singular unit sending iterative vibrations outbound into a vacuum field of eventual dissipation support any concept of conscious participation in reconciliation of the perpetual present?
Well:
The concept is that the outbound waves never lose "entelechy," but dissipate as their intensity trades out to acceleration. As the outbound acceleration reaches a point such that no vibration remains, the vacuum of the field replenishes to call forth another vibration from the singular unit.
In one respect, the sequence between outbound waves is digitally durational.
In another respect, the present relationship between the singular unit and its field is instantaneous. Each area of vibration and vacuum is contemporaneously correlative.
Moreover, what is being waved outbound is not consisted merely of waves of mechanism, but iterative waves of Will, which combine in constructive and destructive clumps of interference, to produce organizations of Will.
As clumps enlarge and multiply, their organizations begin to exhibit properties of mass, density, push, pull, charge, spin, polarity, radiation, attachment, connection, reflection, and feedback.
At levels of holism, there may abide means of instantaneous communication and expericnce of the present as the present.
Dark matter: cilia like clumps of vibrations that have not yet clumped enough to be meaningfully measurable in effect except in bulk
Sizeless massless bosons follos s-t curve until reflected, refracted, or absorbed by encountering an organized mass.
Vectors of centers of gravity of organized masses local disturbances that affect the s-t curve, but do not in themselves constitute the s-t curve, because the s-t curve that is applicable to each body that is not emitting energy for propelling out of its inertial frame specially varies in respect of such body's inertial vector and mass. A body that is expending energy in order to accelerate or decelerate in relation to an external inertial center of gravity will be transitioning through changing inertial frames. Thus, the s-t curve that affects its trajectory will be different from other bodies in other inertial frame contexts. Each may encounter differently renormalative effects of s-t curvature, depending on relative mass, energy conversion, acceleration, vector, and context.
A massless, sizeless boson has no will that can be effective to move its wave function out of its trajectory in respect of s-t curvature.
Although mere will from an external perspective cannot move a photon/boson wave out of its curvature trajectory in s-t, an external will may, by focusing apprehension upon the photon-wave-will, participate with a contemporaneous collapse of part of the wave to a particular, digital, photonic function.
This would not pull the photon from its assigned trajectory, but may allow the photon to take a form that can be reflected, refracted, or absorbed by an organization of mass that may happen to be in its path.
The wave function of bosons organized in clumps of mass may interact with the wave function of light to reflect, refract, or interfere with it, or to collapse it to photonic form and capture, absorb, and transpose it into a different organization of substance or mass.
This, the wave function is not directly affected by externally organized expressions of will, but the photonic collapse function may be. There seems to be no energy expenditure transfer in a collapse of wave to photon.
S-t requires curvature.
Light wave vectors have to obey/follow s-t curvature.
By itself, light cannot escape the path of s-t curvature that it follows.
Depending on organization of mass or body or eye or retina for recording information or making observations or receiving photonic data transfers, it may participate in leading a light wave to collapse into a photon for effecting an informational transfer, regarding the last change in wavelength that was made to the light that happens to be received just before it was received.
At some point, must all energy and heat dissipate, leaving only such organizations of mass as constitute cold matter?
All substance, including mass, matter, massless matter, massless energy, and energy, must obey a formula for following a vector for its trajectory along s-t curvature. It cannot leave the trajectory unless it encounters an organized mass. It cannot collapse its wave function unless an organized mass it encounters has a capacity to take a transfer of wavelength data transfer.
Thus, matter must obey s-t curvature.
Q: can the s-t field/curve expand perpetually?
There can only be s-t where there is curvature.
There can only be curvature where there id disturbance.
There can only be disturbance where there is mass.
Q: is there a point of max curvature beyond which matter cannot further expand s-t?
At such point, would symmetry be restored?
Would the field thus again become mathematically sizeless, with no relativistic differentiation?
At such point, would the Singularity bubble/crack a new System of formulas and vibrations?
Chronological protective mechanism: I rather suspect I was born before I died.
Vectors of centers of gravity of organized masses local disturbances that affect the s-t curve, but do not in themselves constitute the s-t curve, because the s-t curve that is applicable to each body that is not emitting energy for propelling out of its inertial frame specially varies in respect of such body's inertial vector and mass. A body that is expending energy in order to accelerate or decelerate in relation to an external inertial center of gravity will be transitioning through changing inertial frames. Thus, the s-t curve that affects its trajectory will be different from other bodies in other inertial frame contexts. Each may encounter differently renormalative effects of s-t curvature, depending on relative mass, energy conversion, acceleration, vector, and context.
A massless, sizeless boson has no will that can be effective to move its wave function out of its trajectory in respect of s-t curvature.
Although mere will from an external perspective cannot move a photon/boson wave out of its curvature trajectory in s-t, an external will may, by focusing apprehension upon the photon-wave-will, participate with a contemporaneous collapse of part of the wave to a particular, digital, photonic function.
This would not pull the photon from its assigned trajectory, but may allow the photon to take a form that can be reflected, refracted, or absorbed by an organization of mass that may happen to be in its path.
The wave function of bosons organized in clumps of mass may interact with the wave function of light to reflect, refract, or interfere with it, or to collapse it to photonic form and capture, absorb, and transpose it into a different organization of substance or mass.
This, the wave function is not directly affected by externally organized expressions of will, but the photonic collapse function may be. There seems to be no energy expenditure transfer in a collapse of wave to photon.
S-t requires curvature.
Light wave vectors have to obey/follow s-t curvature.
By itself, light cannot escape the path of s-t curvature that it follows.
Depending on organization of mass or body or eye or retina for recording information or making observations or receiving photonic data transfers, it may participate in leading a light wave to collapse into a photon for effecting an informational transfer, regarding the last change in wavelength that was made to the light that happens to be received just before it was received.
At some point, must all energy and heat dissipate, leaving only such organizations of mass as constitute cold matter?
All substance, including mass, matter, massless matter, massless energy, and energy, must obey a formula for following a vector for its trajectory along s-t curvature. It cannot leave the trajectory unless it encounters an organized mass. It cannot collapse its wave function unless an organized mass it encounters has a capacity to take a transfer of wavelength data transfer.
Thus, matter must obey s-t curvature.
Q: can the s-t field/curve expand perpetually?
There can only be s-t where there is curvature.
There can only be curvature where there id disturbance.
There can only be disturbance where there is mass.
Q: is there a point of max curvature beyond which matter cannot further expand s-t?
At such point, would symmetry be restored?
Would the field thus again become mathematically sizeless, with no relativistic differentiation?
At such point, would the Singularity bubble/crack a new System of formulas and vibrations?
Chronological protective mechanism: I rather suspect I was born before I died.
Convert space to time by accelerating into a different inertial frame.
Convert time to space by returning to a departed inertial frame.
Convert matter to energy by burning matter.
Convert energy to matter by encasing the rocket engine.
Loght speed
Not infinite
Automatically adjusted to fit every possible, discrete, relational speed, so that each capture of present data will be relayed to every recorder/observer at a set relational speed.
Since there is no absolute grid, this is the only way separate perspective can renormalize communications in respect of any constant.
So, data stored in a photon will remain stored with it until every aspect of that photon is reflected from every possible reflective organization of matter that it can encounter.
Thus, each photon is like an iteration of will, with infinite capacity to transmit data. Thus, every recordation of photonic information is stored, perpetually, so long as the source will wills it.
Is each iteration ever completely reabsorbed into the source unit? Does each perpetually stored phontonic recordation of data retain an individual Identity?
Does the Source unit allow light sources ever to wink out, or does it cycle/call all vibrations of photonic units of will home, and there absorb, forget, or remember their data?
Once data is winked out, since the unit/field is sizeless and timeless, does the data return home instantaneously?
How do I differentiate between that which can be modeled usefully and that which cannot?
Not infinite
Automatically adjusted to fit every possible, discrete, relational speed, so that each capture of present data will be relayed to every recorder/observer at a set relational speed.
Since there is no absolute grid, this is the only way separate perspective can renormalize communications in respect of any constant.
So, data stored in a photon will remain stored with it until every aspect of that photon is reflected from every possible reflective organization of matter that it can encounter.
Thus, each photon is like an iteration of will, with infinite capacity to transmit data. Thus, every recordation of photonic information is stored, perpetually, so long as the source will wills it.
Is each iteration ever completely reabsorbed into the source unit? Does each perpetually stored phontonic recordation of data retain an individual Identity?
Does the Source unit allow light sources ever to wink out, or does it cycle/call all vibrations of photonic units of will home, and there absorb, forget, or remember their data?
Once data is winked out, since the unit/field is sizeless and timeless, does the data return home instantaneously?
How do I differentiate between that which can be modeled usefully and that which cannot?
Somehow, a sizeless source vibrates iterations of will, which, because of asymmetry in vibrations, come to clump in unfolding organizations of constructive and destructive organizations of waves. These are iterative waves of a Source will, so they are a
So perspectives of will, however incomplete or imperfect. All perspectives of will interRelate, but the relation from the Source to its imperfect iterations is measurable only in terms of relationships among the imperfect components, in respect of their imperfect and incomplete relations, contexts, perspectives, and purposes. Their relative relational measures, such as of relative size, depend on relative constants that are common to them. Example: speed of light. This is the constant speed of a single photon, which is interpreted as a constant to every perspective of will. It's relative relational speed through a vacuum of space that has no organization of matter to impede it (beyond the simplest levels of wave vibrations) is what it is.
Relative size-ation depends on image-ination of perspectives of wills, for a generally shared experiential cone, point of view, context, and purpose. There is no size in itself. Just relational sizes and distances and interpretations of intervening sequences.
Organized world of wills.
Is there a universal measure of maximum density and shortest discrete unit of substance?
How is relational speed of light affected by source object s radiation of data carrying and transmitting photons to differently placed and speeding retinas?
Does light travel at all speeds, but is it allowed to impart data only from light that is traveling, relative to an observer, at 186t mps? Iow, does light at all other speeds, upon reaching an observer or recorder, simply pass thru?
Does each wave/photon of light travel at all speeds, but the only aspects of waves and photons that can transmit data to an organized mass of substance are the aspects of waves and photons that happen to be traveling at 186t mps relative to each receiving, absorbing, a d reflecting mass?
Is the rest the non-specifically detected dark matter?
What could radiate/detect all such vibrating speeds? The source unit?
Locally detected informational experience is what wears on and "ages" observers. What ages them is the frequency with which they receive photonic information.
Twin paradox.
The turn to return to home base allows a lot of data to whiz through without ever being detected or experienced.
The return would entail vibrational discretes, but would be interpreted as matching continuously altering correlates.
So perspectives of will, however incomplete or imperfect. All perspectives of will interRelate, but the relation from the Source to its imperfect iterations is measurable only in terms of relationships among the imperfect components, in respect of their imperfect and incomplete relations, contexts, perspectives, and purposes. Their relative relational measures, such as of relative size, depend on relative constants that are common to them. Example: speed of light. This is the constant speed of a single photon, which is interpreted as a constant to every perspective of will. It's relative relational speed through a vacuum of space that has no organization of matter to impede it (beyond the simplest levels of wave vibrations) is what it is.
Relative size-ation depends on image-ination of perspectives of wills, for a generally shared experiential cone, point of view, context, and purpose. There is no size in itself. Just relational sizes and distances and interpretations of intervening sequences.
Organized world of wills.
Is there a universal measure of maximum density and shortest discrete unit of substance?
How is relational speed of light affected by source object s radiation of data carrying and transmitting photons to differently placed and speeding retinas?
Does light travel at all speeds, but is it allowed to impart data only from light that is traveling, relative to an observer, at 186t mps? Iow, does light at all other speeds, upon reaching an observer or recorder, simply pass thru?
Does each wave/photon of light travel at all speeds, but the only aspects of waves and photons that can transmit data to an organized mass of substance are the aspects of waves and photons that happen to be traveling at 186t mps relative to each receiving, absorbing, a d reflecting mass?
Is the rest the non-specifically detected dark matter?
What could radiate/detect all such vibrating speeds? The source unit?
Locally detected informational experience is what wears on and "ages" observers. What ages them is the frequency with which they receive photonic information.
Twin paradox.
The turn to return to home base allows a lot of data to whiz through without ever being detected or experienced.
The return would entail vibrational discretes, but would be interpreted as matching continuously altering correlates.
Possible organizations of interference patterns of iterative vibrations are digitally based, yet infinite. Possible speeds of aspects of light are digitally based, yet infinite.
Gears fall out
When leave inertial frame of reference.
Inertial frame is clumped up closely
Spaces vibrations of will
Mass – organized entanglement of will among other clumps of will.
Waves – obedience of entanglements of wills to relativistic formulas.
S-T math
Sequences
Units of separation in space and time clumps.
Re-normalization between inertial frames.
Appearances of continuosities
Beneath appearance, several digital spurts of digital separations in
Gears mesh when share same inertial frame.
Pb does mass f.o.r. by itself speed up experience of Information, to age you faster?
When accelerate a way from close entanglement mass of wills, digital separateions between vibrations expand.
Potential to experience information about sequential changes slows. So first information from home is re-rationalized and re-interpreted.
Would resident of high mass frame of reference measure the age of the universe to be much more than 13.8 billion years?
Things In Themselves:
We do not see/sense TII’s. Meta things encode and transmit representative relational data, which we then decode to perceive interpret and conceptualize as qualitative data.
The processes of encoding and decoding obey formulas that are relational constants.
All iterative perspectives that happen to share a common cone of experiential definition encode and decode data in obedience to common encompassing formulas, i.e., relative constants. Because they partake of the same encompassing rules, they are not solipsists, but members of a common cone of translatable experience. That is a cone that reconciles our feedback and whose iterations God may appreciate.
The only transcendent vibrating constants are relative constants. i.e., constants that are set to renormalize values regardless of relational communications and transfers between inertial frames of reference.
Depending on proximity to meta vibrational clumps of shared frames of reference, we share rationalizations-renormalizations-interpretations.
We appreciate interpretations of such sequential information as is availed to us, depending on space-time perspective, context, purpose, organization which we may happen to have identified ourselves with.
There are no facts as facts.
There are facts as experienced or shared to experience.
Even chronological sequencing is relative to perspective and context.
Observers from other points of view and contexts may rationalize and renormalize sense-perceive-interpret “the events” as having occurred in a different order, or even not at all.
The events , and information regarding the events, are not TII’s.
Chronological Protection Mechanism applies only to a p.o.v. / context – not to an absolute world story.
So, would the “age of the universe” be calculated differently, elsewhere in the cosmos?
Problem: Were one to go elsewhere to test, how would one know whether one were renormalizing to the same absolute time?
Travel to the future is possible. The traveling twin returns to find the stay at home twin will have experienced much more time and be much older.
The stay at home twin would have experienced more orbits among the atoms that comprise his body. More supper times and more times to the bathroom. If both kept local camera trained on themselves and on their twin, and played them back at reunion, the time length of the traveling twin’s recording reel would be considerably shorter. Information would have been compressed and lost on the traveling twin’s recording of the stay at home twin. What about information recorded by the stay at home twin on the traveling twin? The stay at home twin’s recording would be longer and in slow motion at various places. It would have recorded more information than the traveling twin would have recorded about himself. How? Well, because recording movies consists of a series of recorded frames. The stay at home twin would have taken more frame shots of the traveling twin than the traveling twin would have taken of himself. In relying on information recorded in the movie cameras, each twin would be renormalizing interpretations of reality based on different numbers of frame shots. Some of the frame shots taken by the stay at home twin would fall out of the experience of the traveling twin for renormalizing purposes. This seems to suggest time is both relative and granular, albeit differently granular depending on relative inertial frame.
If one goes “elsewhere” for a different future time, it would seem difficult to renormalize to an absolute measure of the age of the universe as a whole.
If there were an absolute age of the universe, as universe, it would seem there would be a present universal nowness.
But even if there is not an absolute age of the universe, would there not still be a present universal nowness, albeit one that constantly renormalizes granular feedback between relational inertial frames?
When light strikes a clump and is reflected, thus to change its wavelength, must not that instant be a then nowness, whose sequential information is preserved all along the frictionless path that light must take?
Must not that photon NOW, in nowness, be somewhere along the s-t curve?
Problem: Is the photon in itself an extant TII, with an objective location?
Or is it more like a mirage, albeit, a mirage shared by perspectives situated to perceive it in common?
Or must the photon implicate a meta underlying TII essential“iteration of a vibration of a standard objective source singular Unit?”
Can “the past” now still exist, anywhere else in space-time?
Digital
Gears
Gears drop out
Granular renormalization to appearance to perspective renormalized to inertial frame
Is NOWNESS a universal TII?
Or an epiphenomena of a TII?
Frictionless path of s-t curvature.
This instantaneous communication
Polarity
Will
Digital renormalization of measurable manifestations of existentiality
The switch between comparative inertial frames is what changes relative rates of wear and tear that are made by energy on matter.
Previously accumulated information remains potentially causal in the present.
May past information be preserved to the collective unconscious of the System, but forgotten to God’s present focus?
Are meta vibrations the Source of both light waves and gravity waves?
Do gravity waves have wavelengths that act differently, depending on acceleration and changes between organizations of inertial frames?
Red Shift
Blue Shift
The wavelength is affected both by photon being reflected and by photon’s chasing after traveling twin.
Relative effect is interpreted.
How do light waves radiate in empty space? Not under measurable expenditure of energy, but under frictionless following of s-t curvature.
A perspective of an organization of conscious will cannot relate to any context except in relative respect – organization to organization.
??? There is no absolute number of vibrations or points or units of Will.
There are relative, happenstance, fluxing, combinations of contexts/perspectives/purposes.
Arbitrarily select any one and use it as a “standard,” and you can relate with degrees and kinds of nearby inertial frames.
Any favored perspective of will will renormalize-rationalize to interpret continuosities, in its feedback relationship with the cosmos.
The renormalitive interpretation it makes may be comnparable to that of other perspectives, but there is no one true absolute interpretation.
There are interpretations that will more or less tend to be shared to the extent the interpreting perspectives share a same inertial frame, in coordinate match of acceleration, spin, and inertial frame.
Q: DOES THE TURNAROUND PRECLUDE EXPERIENTIAL REPRESENTATION AND PRESENTATION OF CERTAIN LIGHT WAVELENGTH DATA?
Light carrying wavelength change reflective data.
Does light retain wavelength data of that from which it is reflected, but not from that through which it traverses? Water?
How do light waves radiate through vacuum of s-t?
What causes mass?
What causes waves of will to clump into organizations for expressing dimensions, formulas, qualities, mass, energy, bindingness, waves, radiation, charge, polarity, amplitude, frequency, spin, etc?
How can any internally consistent model be conceptualized?
What is the Originator like, in respect of what it has originated?
Vibration number
Wave frequency
Clump amplitude grid relative measurability nowness
Digital grid gear transference
Zeno
We do we perceive any particularity whose perspective cannot be represented to be perceivable to our present or our potentiality.
If there is no standard inertial frame that can be measured, then how an any inertial frame be defined, or relate to any other, or be synchronized to all others?
How can there presently be a first, previous cause, i.e., a changeless changer?
How does the holism feed back in instantaneous nowness?
Time-grnaular
Mass – basic unit
Does any “force” or field synchronize a Now, instantaneously?
Does speed of gravity force equal speed of light?
Light radiates.
It does not accelerate.
It follows the geometric path of curvature that is marked by mass disturbances in space-time.
Is gravity a feature of frictionless geometry of an inertial following of s-t curve, such that any sizeless, massless wave or point has no alternative but to follow the curvature that attracts it, unless something gets in its way to alter its state, as by reconfiguring its formal organization or by altering its energy-matter ratio.
Or is gravity a force? An attractive or repulsive force?
Do vibrations of will travel instantaneously?
Do meta organized qualitative vibrations of will self affect the s-t curvature?
Gravitons follow same path as photons?
But masses follow same path as masses.
Relational expressions of mass changes.
Variations of inertial effects abid throughout the s-t curvature, thus, observers cross inertial frames of reference.
What is force-cause and what is merely geometrical correlative/
So that it then fills with clumps of feedback of will,which we interpret as “mass.”
Qualitative Feedback between Organizations of will follows s-t curve and takes relative s-t, qualitative, unmeasured feedback with source will is instantaneous.
I don’t know what the whole grid of s-t relationships among frames of reference is.
But whatever it is, it is synchronized to obey conservational formulas, instantaneously, or, by “borrowing virtual particles,”so that it follows the meta frictionless path.
Energy blasts after my path to take me out of one inertial frame and put me in another.
“Frictionless” is not just in space. It also applies along a curve in s-t.
Includes time.
Therefore, changes in relative acceleration affect relationships among inertial frames, which affect different perceptions of the light that is allowed to pass frictionless to each observe along the s-t curve.
The only light I will receive in my new locus of s-t will be light that travels frictionless.
When I “turn back,” I will have again changed along my inertial frame of reference.
That is, my relative locus in the curvature of s-t will change as I slow down and turn back.
QUESTIONS:
Red shift/blue shift
Wavelength effects on information received v. passed by
Effect on information transferred
Signals on passing trains
A single Identity cannot violate the sequence of its birth–memory-death.
However, may other perceptions re-normalize/interpret/ in reversal?
Perhaps so, but NOT so long as their interpretation protects/relates to the same identity.
Each Inertial Frame protects a common frame for relating iterations of experiences of identities.
They would have to renormalize an experience-interpretation of s-t in which such Identity was not encountered.
But the Identity of a mortal is not a TII, either.
Mortal Identity is a temporal entertainment of God, which does not otherwise exist as a TII.
The presence of matter does not curve s-t.
Rather, the presence of matter MARKS where a curvature of s-t has developed.
???????????????????????????????????????????????FRICTIONLESS???????????
??????????Light does not follow s-t curve because of attraction or repulsion of gravity, but because, in respect of each recipient or potential recipient of each vectored perspective of will, that is the most frictionless path for light at the wavelength-amplitude-frequency-intensity being received.
Pb: what could slow, rub, or push light from any other path? Other combinations, clumps, and vibrations of will???????
??????????HOW DO CLUMPS OF WILL VIBRATIONS BEND LIGHT?
Light carries energy, but not mass. If light is trapped in a container, its energy will increase the mass of the container. Light at rest has mass. ????? Light in radiation has no mass. If light is absorbed, it is converted and rendered at rest, thus increasing mass. ????
Any other path would violate friction formulas re changes in inertial frames.
The unfolding s-t curve is established and guided by source will, instantaneously.
It may be measured, but not precisely duplicated.
Iterations of will vibrate out as different kinds of sizeless/massless bosons-photons-gravitons etc. == speed of light.
Different kinds of bosons clump to form mass.
Thus, the Singular Unit immeasurably, presently, instantaneously established and maintains the s-t field, and contemporaneously, it discretely pulses vibrations out in interations of different kinds of bosons, which form matter and energy. Thus, STME.
Renormalizing experientiation of mathematical sequences avails our experiences of continuous relational meaning and signification.
Thus, changes in inertial frames of reference will not affect the speed of light, because the only light that will transfer from one inertial frame to another will do so without expending energy of translating its essential quality of being light.
When an Observer accelerates, or travels to a different mass or curvature of s-t. it expends energy, puts wear and tear and energy and evolution against its organization of body.
Thus, it ages differently.
But the speed of the light that follows it will always be seen by it as being at the speed of light.
The formulas of the Holism avail possible parameters and choices among the particular perspectives.
Electromagnetic waves follow the only available frictionless path.
But, their collapses into photonic expressions are availed degrees of freedom.
Such collapses may be random, or affected by the qualitative feedback of a recorder or observer.
s-t curvature and conscious will are both frictionless.
In every part of s-t, light waves, given their locally observed speed, will follow the path of least friction, and will be interpreted as traveling at a constant speed.
Light is only observed within the inertial frame in which it is received.
Light is not observed in the inertial frame from which it may have traveled.
In the inertial frame in which it is received, it will be interpreted to local renormalizing perspective as traveling at sol.
In respect of the inertial frame from which it was transmitted, it will be inferred, for the local perspectives that then were there, that it was perceived to them as traveling at sol.
QUESTION: Up to the point when and where a light wave is received by a retina, may the light wave itself, when it was traversing through different inertial frames, have ???? actually traveled ???? at different speeds in relation to the eventual observer?
Thus, might the “actual distance” in space between a transmitting source and a receiver be different than 186T mps x seconds between transmission and receipt?
If we establish the light years a transmitter is away, does that necessarily establish actual distance? Well, it establishes the “practical distance???,” since any rocket could never exceed the speed of light.
But may there be a meta distance for vibrations of will, that would be actual or different????
Our apprehensions and observations participate to affect the unfolding definition of frictionless s-t curvature, by which all empirical experience is synchronized and renormalized and reconciled.
?????????Is force /energy conveyed/transferred when wave is collapsed?
?????????????DO ANY VIBRATIONS OF WILL (OR GRAVITY) PUSH OR PULL LIGHT WAVES FROM A DISTANCE, WITHOUT DIRECT CONTACT?
ORGANIZATION OF RETINAS: IS THERE SOMETHNG SPECIAL ABOUT THE EVOLUTION OF OBSERVERS’ RETINAS, WHICH ALLOWS THEM TO COLLAPSE AND REFLECT LIGHT WAVES?
Is each collapse of a photon is a mark /signification of an organization of will having focused an apprehension?
Clumps of vibrations (disturbances in s-t) of will define inertial frames, which are contemporaneously marked with mass.
These define curvatures of frictionless travel.
If frictionless means the local light wave or mass did not itself expend energy.
If frictionless does not require a constant speed.
Empiricism allows formulas to be worked out to show relative variations in aging upon accelerating among differently measured centers of gravity.
Acceleration when energy changes its relation to a center of gravity.
S-t curved = changes in the relationally fleshed math / gear dropped / renormalized math that vibrations of will adopt or renormalize.
Light does not have a speed in itself, because light in itself does not exist. It exists as a relationship.
Light’s wave vectors along, frictionless.
Its photons collapse as will apprehends them.
Perspectives of conscious will are renormalized to the math of s-t.
DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENT – CAN A RECORDING DEVICE CAUSE/RECORD A COLLAPSE OF LIGHT WAVE TO PHOTON?
SCHRODINGER’S CAT
THE MEASUREMENT PROBLEM
THE CAT DOES NOT EXIST IN ITSELF
RENORMALIZATION OF SEGMENTAL EXCHANGES OF NON-SYMMETRICAL INFORMATION: Checking tire pressure is an example of observer effect: it is difficult to do without leaking out some of the air, thus changing the pressure.. Thus, forms of superpositions of Information are often leaked into the wider environment, beyond the realm of measurement. When dealing with very small objects, as in quantum mechanics, it may not be possible to observe a system without changing it, so that the observer must be considered part of the system being observed.
“Decoherence does not generate actual wave function collapse. It only provides an explanation for the observance of wave function collapse, as the quantum nature of the system "leaks" into the environment. That is, components of the wavefunction are decoupled from a coherent system, and acquire phases from their immediate surroundings.”
“Specifically, decoherence does not attempt to explain the measurement problem. Rather, decoherence provides an explanation for the transition of the system to a mixture of states that seem to correspond to those states observers perceive.”
“Decoherence does not provide a mechanism for the actual wave function collapse; rather it provides a mechanism for the appearance of wavefunction collapse. The quantum nature of the system is simply "leaked" into the environment so that a total superposition of the wavefunction still exists, but exists — at least for all practical purposes — beyond the realm of measurement.”
“Analysis of an actual experiment found that measurement alone (for example by a Geiger counter) is sufficient to collapse a quantum wave function before there is any conscious observation of the measurement. The view that the "observation" is taken when a particle from the nucleus hits the detector can be developed into objective collapse theories. The thought experiment requires an "unconscious observation" by the detector in order for magnification to occur. In contrast, the many worlds approach denies that collapse ever occurs.”
“In science, the term observer effect refers to changes that the act of observation will make on a phenomenon being observed. This is often the result of instruments that, by necessity, alter the state of what they measure in some manner. A commonplace example is checking the pressure in an automobile tire; this is difficult to do without letting out some of the air, thus changing the pressure. This effect can be observed in many domains of physics.
The observer effect on a physical process can often be reduced to insignificance by using better instruments or observation techniques. However in quantum mechanics, which deals with very small objects, it is not possible to observe a system without changing the system, so the observer must be considered part of the system being observed.”
Photon – a digital quantity of light
In wave function, its quanta can be variously conceptualized as being stretched in amplitude, frequency, and wavelength.
EACH DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE ENTANGLES WITH A DIFFERENT DERIVATIVE INTERPRETATON OF COSMIC SIGNIFICATION OUT OF COSMIC POTENTIALITY
Reality is DIGITAL?
Re Field of Iterations of Singular Unit, as assigned with values by subformulas being fluxed under a Top Formula
Differential equations and analysis of dimensional conversions
Differential equations and analysis of dimensional conversions
Sussing the Top Algorithm
The unit cannot itself be measured.
It is applied to express various qualities of dimensions which can be locally, relationally, relatively compared and measured.
There seems to be no standard unit of beat, to which the cosmos synchronizes the passing of time.
Yet there abides a cosmic NOWNESS.
Yet there abides a cosmic NOWNESS.
There is no unit of digital measure of distance which is not stretched or contracted, depending on point of view, relative frame of reference, and relational direction and speed of motion.
SUSSING: How may relative and proportionate field values be sussed out in any kind of consistency for the various qualities which we may measure?
Qualities such as mass, (M) matter, (E) energy, density, bindingness, statistical radiation, polarity, (C) charge, location, grid, speed, direction, vector, (S-T) separation in space-time, velocity, spin, frequency, amplitude, intensity, reactivity.
Thought experiment:
Assign an arbitrary 1 million value to the Singular Unit. For locally measurable expressions of measurable qualities, assign proportionate values based on convertibility.
E = Mass x SL sqd.
Etc.
Weight cross conversion values for different qualities of a field under consideration as a "standard field."
Thus gradually suss/solve for proportionate conversion values.
Assign "x" to unknown, to complete the 1 million value.
Eventually, solve for most proportionate and/or conversionary or inverse values among the variously measurable qualities.
Qualities such as mass, (M) matter, (E) energy, density, bindingness, statistical radiation, polarity, (C) charge, location, grid, speed, direction, vector, (S-T) separation in space-time, velocity, spin, frequency, amplitude, intensity, reactivity.
Thought experiment:
Assign an arbitrary 1 million value to the Singular Unit. For locally measurable expressions of measurable qualities, assign proportionate values based on convertibility.
E = Mass x SL sqd.
Etc.
Weight cross conversion values for different qualities of a field under consideration as a "standard field."
Thus gradually suss/solve for proportionate conversion values.
Assign "x" to unknown, to complete the 1 million value.
Eventually, solve for most proportionate and/or conversionary or inverse values among the variously measurable qualities.
HOW DOES LIGHT AND RADIATION WORK??? SPECIAL FORMULAIC EXCHANGES? Trapping sub-formulas within a formula that constrains radiation. Is radiation discrete or continuous?
Distances in time and space are granular in respect of discrete formulations.
The ruling Algorithm is based on discretes.
If Universe comprised of sizeless units, then how does cosmic sum of such units, even if such sum would itself be sizeless, come to have capacity to avail expression of contextual and relational qualities and quantities of size and mass?
Even within a locally contexted organization of such units, if traversal of each unit would be infinitely insignificant, then how could any unit be relationally organized or charged to revolve, rotate, or roll in respect of any other?
Even within a locally contexted organization of such units, if traversal of each unit would be infinitely insignificant, then how could any unit be relationally organized or charged to revolve, rotate, or roll in respect of any other?
Unless each separation, segment, or sequence in space or time is mathematically discrete (granularly quanticizeable), as opposed to an infinity of continuously smaller divisions, then by what means or formula could anyone reasonably hope to cross from any one point to another? If space and/or time are continuous and composed of an infinity of ever smaller building blocks, then how could any segment of either ever be reasonably conceptualized as the smallest segment?
Can God forget?
Are there limits to the Quantities that can be recorded or remembered under the System?
????Pauli exclusion principle -- bosons v fermions
When fermions occupy the same space-time point, are they really "there"? Do they add mass and density, or just values for facilitating mediating recombinations of annihilations of destructive interference of wave packets?
Bosons -- push pull exclude attract repel????
vibrations of will
wave packets of will
will -- Is mortal will renormalized so as to directly push pull sense other packets of mortal will, "as they really are"?
No comments:
Post a Comment