BIG WIP

META DIGITS APPLIED TO META FORMULAS, AND FLUXED TO YIELD A QUALITY OF META APPREHENSION:

DIGITAL BASED SYSTEM OF ALGORITHMS, SUBJECT TO FEEDBACK-CONSCIOUS GUIDE:

Overlapping channels of presentment and determination and sensateness and perception

Math of math of math

Consciousness of consciousness of consciousness

Information of information of information

Iterative repetitive projection of limited kinds of things –organons and organizations of organizations of organizations.

Meta vibrations tending to select formulas for the projection of iterations separated in levels and sequences of iterations

Come to an intermediary consistent map of reality via algorithmic analysis.

The Top Formula has access to the potentiality of our qualities of consciousness through it.

Here is represented my leap of faith.

Formulas

God

/ \

Potentiality \

Shared cone of experience

/ \

Mortal observers Angels

/ \ \

Humanity other mortals all appearances relatively reconciled

?????Why should angels derive of God, but man be contrived to rise from bacteria?

Because Angels are perspectives of a holism, while mortals are perspectives emerging from organizations of digitals?

So then, did god first spawn the Angels, then they bacteria, then us?

Are sub-formulas the top formulas of previous iterations, reduced to relativistic comparison by the accumulation of Information for the Field?

Field of qualitative organizations of preceding iterations of the vibrating unit.

Fluxing qualitative of measurable quantitatives

Conservationally iterative accumulations of formulaic interfunctionings.

Vibration – active mumerosity

Field – iterated formulations

Unit – iterable form

Chutzpah – the regime puppeteers the administration that does the evil, then says the evil is the administration’s fault, then says the regime needs to stay in power so it can stop the evil.

Hierarchy of formulas

> \/

I /\ /\

I / \/ \>

If my “hypothesis” is correct, then nearly every kind of relationship that can be imagined, which is not a direct contradiction, would seem amenable of being coaxed into expressible and measurable manifestation in some frame of reference, shared cone of experience, or alternative cosmos.

INCEPTION

Given a dead, alternative, world of Potentiality:

Would the introduction of a single perspective of consciousness then “collapse” the entire potentiality into measurable manifestation?

UNIT: To be a unit, it must conserve and vibrate, as a unit, and communicate itself in vibrational projections of iterations. Its existence entails its adoption with such a Top Formula.

Truth by definition, i.e., a mathematical truth.
What A Priori Truths may define, constrain, or empower God, or the originating Source of each organizing, relational determinism?

1. Top organization: Singular Unit , meta Field of Vibrations, tendencies to cyclical translatable recordable representative informative manifestations out of potentialities
2. Intermediate organizations
Math geometry sequence form signification
3. Sub organizations - iterations organized in respect of mathematical geometrical and sequential relationships

Spin charge binding reactivity radiation
E=mc2d
G
Speed of light
STME translational particles fields
4. Representations of representations
Sub sub organizations - relational sensation perception conception
Perspectives of consciousness
Qualities of empathetic feedback
Representations of reps of reps
5. The Cloud
6. Cyclic repeat
Vibrating iterations that obey
@@@@@@

To avail the most fundamental formulas for organizing sensations perceptions conceptions?

Does EMR bombardment eventually knock particles loose, to avail them to radiate?

Translations of particular organizations: for expressing energy; for expressing matter; for expressing EMR.

Bindingness and Reactiveness

What a priori constants and constraints associate with the singular unit and its field of vibrations?

Space time mathmath of geometry

&&&&&&&&&&&

The Superior Unit abides as an un-mixable vibration of a unit of a field, which conserves and iterates relational and transitional mixes.
It avails severable experiences derivative of an inseverable holism.

OUTBOUND PROBLEM: If the direction of wave vibration is always expanding outbound, then it could not convey feedback information to be recorded, learned, or accessed at its source.
Any reconciliation then need not be of will or conscious apprehension, but only of outbound wave mechanics.
So how can my conceptual model of a singular unit sending iterative vibrations outbound into a vacuum field of eventual dissipation support any concept of conscious participation in reconciliation of the perpetual present?
Well:
The concept is that the outbound waves never lose "entelechy," but dissipate as their intensity trades out to acceleration. As the outbound acceleration reaches a point such that no vibration remains, the vacuum of the field replenishes to call forth another vibration from the singular unit.
In one respect, the sequence between outbound waves is digitally durational.
In another respect, the present relationship between the singular unit and its field is instantaneous. Each area of vibration and vacuum is contemporaneously correlative.
Moreover, what is being waved outbound is not consisted merely of waves of mechanism, but iterative waves of Will, which combine in constructive and destructive clumps of interference, to produce organizations of Will.
As clumps enlarge and multiply, their organizations begin to exhibit propertiesof mass, density, push, pull, charge, spin, polarity, radiation, attachment, connection, reflection, and feedback.
At levels of holism, there may abide means of instantaneous communication and expericnce of the present as the present.

DARK MATTER: cilia like clumps of vibrations that have not yet clumped enough to be meaningfully measurable in effect, except in bulk

Sizeless massless bosons follow s-t curve until reflected, refracted, or absorbed by encountering an organized mass.
Vectors of centers of gravity of organized masses associate with local disturbances thataffect the s-t curve, but do not in themselves constitute the s-t curve, because the s-t curve that is applicable to each body that is not emitting energy for propelling out of its inertial frame specially varies in respect of such body's inertial vector and mass. A body that is expending energy in order to accelerate or decelerate in relation to an external inertial center of gravity will be transitioning through changing inertial frames. Thus, the s-t curve that affects its trajectory will be different from other bodies in other inertial frame contexts. Each may encounter differently renormalative effects of s-t curvature, depending on relative mass, energy conversion, acceleration, vector, and context.

A massless, sizeless boson has no will that can be effective to move its wave function out of its trajectory in respect of s-t curvature.
Although mere will from an external perspective cannot move a photon/boson wave out of its curvature trajectory in s-t, an external will may, by focusing apprehension upon the photon-wave-will, participate with a contemporaneous collapse of part of the wave to a particular, digital, photonic function. ???
This would not directly pull the photon from its assigned trajectory, but may indirectly, by allowing the photon to take a form that can be reflected, refracted, or absorbed by an organization of mass that may happen to be in its path.The wave function of bosons organized in clumps of mass may interact with the wave function of light to reflect, refract, or interfere with it, or to collapse it to photonic form and capture, absorb, and transpose it into a different organization of substance or mass.
This, the wave function is not directly affected by externally organized expressions of will, but the photonic collapse function may be. There seems to be no energy expenditure transfer in a collapse of wave to photon.???

S-t requires curvature.
Unless transitioned, absorbed, reflected, or refracted, light wave vectors have to obey/follow s-t curvature.
By itself, light cannot escape the path of s-t curvature that it follows.
Depending on organization (of mass or body or eye or retina) for recording information or making observations or receiving photonic data transfers, such organization may factor or participate in leading a light wave to collapse into a photon for effecting an informational transfer, regarding the last change in wavelength that was made to the light that happens to be received just before it was received.

At some point, must all energy and heat dissipate, leaving only such organizations of mass as constitute dissipated, cold matter?

All substance, including mass, matter, massless matter, massless energy, and energy, must obey a formula for following a vector for its trajectory along s-t curvature. It cannot leave the trajectory unless it encounters an organized mass. It cannot collapse its wave function unless an organized mass it encounters has a capacity to take a transfer of wavelength data transfer.
Thus, matter must obey s-t curvature.
Q: can the s-t field/curve expand perpetually?
There can only be s-t where there is curvature.
There can only be curvature where there is disturbance.
There can only be disturbance where there is mass or charge.
Q: Is there a point of max curvature beyond which matter cannot further expand s-t?
At such point, would Symmetry be restored?
Would the field thus again become mathematically sizeless, with no relativistic differentiation?

At such point, would the Singularity bubble/crack a new System of formulas and vibrations?

Chronological protective mechanism: I rather suspect I was born before I died.

CONVERSIONS BETWEEN ENERGY-MATTER-SPACE-TIME:

Convert space to time by accelerating into a different inertial frame.

Convert time to space by returning to a departed inertial frame.

Convert matter to energy by burning matter.

Convert energy to matter by encasing the rocket engine.

Light speed
Not infinite
Automatically adjusted to fit every possible, discrete, relational speed, so that each capture of present data will be relayed to every recorder/observer at a set relational speed.
Since there is no absolute grid, this is the only way separate perspectives can renormalize communications in respect of any constant.
So, data stored in a photon (becasue of frequence alteration) will remain stored with it until every aspect of "that identifiable photon" is reflected from every possible reflective organization of matter that it can encounter.

Are photons individually distinguishable in respect of frequency and context?

Is each photon like an iteration of will, with infinite capacity to transmit data? Is every recordation of photonic information stored, perpetually, so long as the source Will wills it?
Is each iteration ever completely reabsorbed into the Source Unit? Does each perpetually stored phontonic recordation of data retain an individual Identity?
Does the Source Unit allow light sources ever to wink out, or does it cycle/call all vibrations of photonic units of will home, and there absorb, forget, or remember their data?
Once data is winked out, since the unit/field is sizeless and timeless, does the data return home "instantaneously"?

How do I differentiate between that which can be modeled usefully and that which cannot?

Somehow, a sizeless source vibrates iterations of will, which, because of asymmetry in vibrations, come to clump in unfolding organizations of constructive and destructive organizations of waves. These are iterative waves of a Source will, so they are a perspectives of will, however incomplete or imperfect.

All perspectives of will interRelate, but the relation from the Source to its imperfect iterations is measurable, anong mortals, only in terms of relationships among the imperfect components, in respect of their imperfect and incomplete relations, contexts, perspectives, and purposes. Their relative relational measures, such as of relative size, depend on relative constants that are common to them. Example: speed of light. This is the constant speed of a single photon, which is interpreted as a constant to every perspective of will. It's relative relational speed (through a vacuum of space that has no organization of matter to impede it beyond the simplest levels of wave vibrations) is what it is.
Relative size-ation depends on image-ination of perspectives of wills, for a generally shared experiential cone, point of view, context, and purpose. There is no size in itself. Just relational sizes and distances and interpretations of intervening sequences.
Organized world of wills.
Is there a universal measure of maximum density and shortest discrete unit of substance?
How is relational speed of light affected by source object radiation of data, carrying and transmitting photons to differently placed and speeding retinas?
Does light travel at all speeds, but is it allowed to impart data only from light that is traveling, relative to an observer, at 186T mps? IOW, does light at all other speeds, upon reaching an observer or recorder, simply pass thru?
Does each wave/photon of light travel at all speeds, but the only aspects of waves and photons that can transmit data to an organized mass of substance are the aspects of waves and photons that happen to be traveling at 186t mps relative to each receiving, absorbing, a d reflecting mass?

Is all the rest the non-specifically detected Dark Matter?

What could radiate/detect all such vibrating speeds? The Source Unit?

WEAR AND TEAR: Locally detected informational experience is what wears on and "ages" observers. What ages them is the frequency with which they receive photonic information.

Twin paradox:
The turn to return to home base allows a lot of data to whiz through without ever being detected or experienced.

The return would entail vibrational discretes, but would be interpreted as matching continuously altering correlates. Possible organizations of interference patterns of iterative vibrations are digitally based, yet infinite. Possible speeds of aspects of light are digitally based, yet infinite. Gears fall out. When leave inertial frame of reference. Inertial frame is clumped up closely.

Spaces -- vibrations of will

Mass – organized entanglement of will among other clumps of will. Waves – obedience of entanglements of wills to relativistic formulas. S-T math

Units of Separation in space and time clumps

^^^

Sequences Re-normalization between inertial frames. Appearances of continuosities

Beneath appearance, several digital spurts of digital separations in

Gears mesh when share same inertial frame.

Pb: Does a mass f.o.r., by itself, speed up experience of Information, to age you faster?

When you accelerate away from a close entanglement of a mass of wills, then digital separations between vibrations expand.

Thus, the potential to experience information about sequential changes slows.So first information from home is re-rationalized and re-interpreted.

Would a resident of a high mass frame of reference measure the age of the universe to be much more than 13.8 billion years?

Things In Themselves:

We do not see/sense TII’s. Meta things encode and transmit representative relational data, which we then decode to perceive interpret and conceptualize as qualitative data.

The processes of encoding and decoding obey formulas that are relational constants.

All iterative perspectives that happen to share a common cone of experiential definition encode and decode data in obedience to common encompassing FORMULAS, i.e., relative constants.Because they partake of the same encompassing rules, they are not solipsists, but members of a common cone of translatable experience.That is a cone that reconciles our feedback and whose iterations God may appreciate.

The only transcendent vibrating constants are relative constants. i.e., constants that are set to renormalize values regardless of relational communications and transfers between inertial frames of reference.

Depending on proximity to meta vibrational clumps of shared frames of reference, we share rationalizations-renormalizations-interpretations.

We appreciate interpretations of such sequential information as is availed to us, depending on space-time perspective, context, purpose, organization which we may happen to have identified ourselves with.

There are no non-trivial "facts as facts."

There are facts as experienced or shared to experience.

Even chronological sequencing is relative to perspective and context.

Observers from other points of view and contexts may rationalize and renormalize sense-perceive-interpret “the events” as having occurred in a different order, or even not at all.

The events, and information regarding the events, are not TII’s.

Chronological Protection Mechanism applies only to a p.o.v. / context – not to an absolute world story.

So, would the “age of the universe” be calculated differently, elsewhere in the cosmos?

Problem:Were one to go elsewhere to test, how would one know whether one were renormalizing to the same absolute time?

Travel to the future is possible.The traveling twin will return to find the stay at home twin will have experienced much more time so that he will be much older.

The stay at home twin would have experienced more orbits among the atoms that comprise his body.More supper times and more times to the bathroom.If both kept local camera trained on themselves and on their twin, and played them back at reunion, the time length of the traveling twin’s recording reel would be considerably shorter.Information would have been compressed and lost on the traveling twin’s recording of the stay at home twin.What about information recorded by the stay at home twin on the traveling twin?The stay at home twin’s recording would be longer and in slow motion at various places.It would have recorded more information than the traveling twin would have recorded about himself.How? Well, because recording movies consists of a series of recorded frames.The stay at home twin would, at the times taken, have taken more frame shots of the traveling twin than the traveling twin would have taken of himself.In relying on information recorded in the movie cameras,each twin would be renormalizing interpretations of reality based on different numbers of frame shots.Some of the frame shots taken by the stay at home twin, at the times taken, would have fallen out of the experience of the traveling twin, for renormalizing purposes.This seems to suggest time is both relative and granular, albeit differently granular depending on relative inertial frame.

If one goes “elsewhere” for a different future time, it would seem difficult to renormalize to an absolute measure of the age of the universe as a whole.

If there were an absolute age of the universe, as universe, it would seem there would be a present universal nowness.

But even if there is not an absolute age of the universe, would there not still be a present universal nowness, albeit one that constantly renormalizes granular feedback between relational inertial frames?

When light strikes a clump and is reflected, thus to change its wavelength, must not that instant be a then nowness, whose sequential information will be preserved all along the unimpeded or frictionless path that light must take?

Must not that photon NOW, in nowness, be somewhere along the s-t curve?

Problem:Is the photon-in-itself an extant TII, with an objective location?

Or is it more like a mirage, albeit, a mirage shared by perspectives situated to perceive it in common?

Or must the photon implicate a meta underlying TII essential“iteration of a vibration of a standard objective source singular Unit?”

Can “the past” now still exist, anywhere else in space-time?

Digital

Gears

Gears drop out

Granular renormalization to appearance to perspective renormalized to inertial frame

Is NOWNESS a universal TII?

Or an epiphenomena of a TII?

Frictionless path of s-t curvature.

This instantaneous communication

Polarity

Will

Digital renormalization of measurable manifestations of existentiality

WEAR AND TEAR: The switch between comparative inertial frames is what changes relative rates of wear and tear that are made by energy on matter.

Previously accumulated information remains potentially causal in the present.

Is past information preserved to the collective unconscious of the System, but forgotten to God’s present focus?

GRAVITY WAVES: Are meta vibrations the Source of both light waves and gravity waves?

Do gravity waves have wavelengths that act differently, depending on acceleration and changes between organizations of inertial frames?

Red Shift

Blue Shift

The wavelength is affected both by photon being reflected and by photon’s chasing after traveling twin.

Relative effect is interpreted.

How do light waves radiate in empty space?Not under measurable expenditure of energy, but under frictionless following of s-t curvature.

A perspective of an organization of conscious will cannot relate to any context except in relative respect – organization to organization.

??? There is no absolute number of vibrations or points or units of Will.

There are relative, happenstance, fluxing, combinations of contexts/perspectives/purposes.

Arbitrarily select any one and use it as a “standard,” and you can relate with degrees and kinds of nearby inertial frames.

Any favored perspective of will will renormalize-rationalize to interpret continuosities, in its feedback relationship with the cosmos.

The renormalitive interpretation it makes may be comnparable to that of other perspectives, but there is no one true absolute interpretation.

There are interpretations that will more or less tend to be shared to the extent the interpreting perspectives share a same inertial frame, in coordinate match of acceleration, spin, and inertial frame.

TWINS -- Q:DOES THE TURNAROUND PRECLUDE EXPERIENTIAL REPRESENTATION AND PRESENTATION OF CERTAIN LIGHT WAVELENGTH DATA?

Light carrying wavelength change reflective data.

Does light retain wavelength data of that from which it is reflected, but not from that through which it traverses? ???Water?

How do light waves radiate through vacuum of s-t?

What causes mass?

What causes waves of will to clump into organizations for expressing dimensions, formulas, qualities, mass, energy, bindingness, waves, radiation, charge, polarity, amplitude, frequency, spin, etc?

How can any internally consistent model be conceptualized?

What is the Originator like, in respect of what it has originated?

Vibrationnumber

Wavefrequency

Clump amplitudegridrelative measurabilitynowness

Digital grid gear transference

Zeno

We do we perceive any particularity whose perspective cannot be represented to be perceivable to our present or our potentiality.

If there is no standard inertial frame that can be measured, then how an any inertial frame be defined, or relate to any other, or be synchronized to all others?

How can there presently be a first, previous cause, i.e., a changeless changer?

How does the holism feed back in instantaneous nowness?

Time-granular

Mass – basic unit

Does any “force” or field synchronize a Now, instantaneously?

Does speed of gravity force equal speed of light?

Light radiates. It does not accelerate.????

It follows the geometric path of curvature that is marked by mass disturbances in space-time.

Is gravity a feature of frictionless geometry of an inertial following of s-t curve, such that any sizeless, massless wave or point has no alternative but to follow the curvature that attracts it, unless something gets in its way to alter its state, as by reconfiguring its formal organization or by altering its energy-matter ratio.

Or is gravity a force? An attractive or repulsive force?

Do vibrations of will travel instantaneously? Does Will quamtum leap instantaneously?

Do meta organized qualitative vibrations of will self-affect the s-t curvature?

Do gravitons follow same path as photons? Or do gravitons clump in different patterns because of different frequencies?

But masses follow same path as masses.

Relational expressions of mass changes.

Variations of inertial effects abid throughout the s-t curvature, thus, observers cross inertial frames of reference.

So that it then fills with clumps of feedback of WILL, which we interpret as “mass.”

What is force-CAUSE and what is merely geometrical-correlative?

Qualitatively Measured Feedback between Organizations of will follows s-t curve and takes relative s-t.

Qualitatively Unmeasured Feedback with Source willis instantaneous.

I don’t know what the whole grid of s-t relationships among frames of reference is.

But whatever it is, it is synchronized to obey conservational formulas, instantaneously, or, by “borrowing virtual particles,”so that it follows the meta frictionless path.

Energy blasts after my path, to take me out of one inertial frame and put me in another.

“Frictionless” is not just in space.It also applies along a curve in s-t.

Includes time.

Therefore, changes in relative acceleration affect relationships among inertial frames, which affect different perceptions of the light that is allowed to pass frictionless to each observe along the s-t curve.

TWIN PARADOX: The only light I will receive in my new locus of s-t will be light that travels frictionless.

When I “turn back,” I will have again changed along my inertial frame of reference.

That is, my relative locus in the curvature of s-t will change as I slow down and turn back.

QUESTIONS:

Red shift/blue shift

Wavelength effects on information received v. passed by

Effect on information transferred

Signals on passing trains

GRANDFATHER PARADOX:

A single Identity cannot violate the sequence of its birth–memory-death.

However, may other perceptions re-normalize/interpret/ in reversal?

Perhaps so, but NOT so long as their interpretation protects/relates to the same identity.

Each Inertial Frame protects a common frame for relating iterations of experiences of identities.

They would have to renormalize an experience-interpretation of s-t in which such Identity was not encountered.

But the Identity of a mortal is not a TII, either.

Mortal Identity is a temporal entertainment of God, which does not otherwise exist as a TII.

The presence of matter does not curve s-t.

Rather, the presence of matter MARKS where a curvature of s-t has developed.

???????????????????????????????????????????????FRICTIONLESS???????????

??????????Light does not follow s-t curve because of attraction or repulsion of gravity, but because, in respect of each recipient or potential recipient of each vectored perspective of will, that is the most frictionless path for light at the wavelength-amplitude-frequency-intensity being received.

Pb:what could slow, rub, or push light from any other path?Other combinations, clumps, and vibrations of will???????

??????????HOW DO CLUMPS OF WILL VIBRATIONS BEND LIGHT?

Light carries energy, but not mass.If light is trapped in a container, its energy will increase the mass of the container. Light at rest has mass. ????? Light in radiation has no mass.If light is absorbed, it is converted and rendered at rest, thus increasing mass. ????

Any other path would violate friction formulas re changes in inertial frames.

The unfolding s-t curve is established and guided by source will, instantaneously.

It may be measured, but not precisely duplicated.

Iterations of will vibrate out as different kinds of sizeless/massless bosons-photons-gravitons etc.== speed of light.

Different kinds of bosons clump to form mass.

Thus, the Singular Unit immeasurably, presently, instantaneously established and maintains the s-t field, and contemporaneously, it discretely pulses vibrations out in interations of different kinds of bosons, which form matter and energy. Thus, STME.

Renormalizing experientiation of mathematical sequences avails our experiences of continuous relational meaning and signification.

Thus, changes in inertial frames of reference will not affect the speed of light, because the only light that will transfer from one inertial frame to another will do so without expending energy of translating its essential quality of being light.

When an Observer accelerates, or travels to a different mass or curvature of s-t. it expends energy, puts wear and tear and energy and evolution against its organization of body.

Thus, it ages differently.

But the speed of the light that follows it will always be seen by it as being at the speed of light.

The formulas of the Holism avail possible parameters and choices among the particular perspectives.

Electromagnetic waves follow the only available frictionless path.

But, their collapses into photonic expressions are availed degrees of freedom.

Such collapses may be random, or affected by the qualitative feedback of a recorder or observer.???

S-T curvature and conscious will are both frictionless.

In every part of s-t, light waves, given their locally observed speed, will follow the path of least friction, and will be interpreted as traveling at a constant speed.

Light is only observed within the inertial frame in which it is received.

Light is not observed in the inertial frame from which it may have traveled.

In the inertial frame in which it is received, it will be interpreted to local renormalizing perspective as traveling at sol.

In respect of the inertial frame from which it was transmitted, it will be inferred, for the local perspectives that then were there, that it was perceived to them as traveling at sol.

QUESTION:Up to the point when and where a light wave is received by a retina, may the light wave itself, when it was traversing through different inertial frames, have ???? actually traveled ???? at different speeds in relation to the eventual observer?

Thus, might the “actual distance” in space between a transmitting source and a receiver be different than 186T mps x seconds between transmission and receipt?

If we establish the light years a transmitter is away, does that necessarily establish actual distance? Well, it establishes the “practical distance???,” since any rocket could never exceed the speed of light.

But may there be a meta distance for vibrations of will, that would be actual or different????

Our apprehensions and observations participate to affect the unfolding definition of frictionless s-t curvature, by which all empirical experience is synchronized and renormalized and reconciled.

?????????Is force /energy conveyed/transferred when wave is collapsed?

?????????????DO ANY VIBRATIONS OF WILL (OR GRAVITY) PUSH OR PULL LIGHT WAVES FROM A DISTANCE, WITHOUT DIRECT CONTACT?

ORGANIZATION OF RETINAS:IS THERE SOMETHNG SPECIAL ABOUT THE EVOLUTION OF OBSERVERS’ RETINAS, WHICH ALLOWS THEM TO COLLAPSE AND REFLECT LIGHT WAVES?

Is each collapse of a photon is a mark /signification of an organization of will having focused an apprehension?

Clumps of vibrations (disturbances in s-t) of will define inertial frames, which are contemporaneously marked with mass.

These define curvatures of frictionless travel.

If frictionless means the local light wave or mass did not itself expend energy.

If frictionless does not require a constant speed.

Empiricism allows formulas to be worked out to show relative variations in aging upon accelerating among differently measured centers of gravity.

Acceleration when energy changes its relation to a center of gravity.

S-t curved = changes in the relationally fleshed math / gear dropped / renormalized math that vibrations of will adopt or renormalize.

Light does not have a speed in itself, because light in itself does not exist.It exists as a relationship.

Light’s wave vectors along, frictionless.

Its photons collapse as will apprehends them.

Perspectives of conscious will are renormalized to the math of s-t.

DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENT – CAN A RECORDING DEVICE CAUSE/RECORD A COLLAPSE OF LIGHT WAVE TO PHOTON?

SCHRODINGER’S CAT

THE MEASUREMENT PROBLEM

THE CAT DOES NOT EXIST IN ITSELF

RENORMALIZATION OF SEGMENTAL EXCHANGES OF NON-SYMMETRICAL INFORMATION:Checking tire pressure is an example of observer effect:it is difficult to do without leaking out some of the air, thus changing the pressure..Thus, forms of superpositions of Information are often leaked into the wider environment, beyond the realm of measurement.When dealing with very small objects, as in quantum mechanics, it may not be possible to observe a system without changing it, so that the observer must be considered part of the system being observed.

“Decoherence does not generate actual wave function collapse. It only provides an explanation for the observance of wave function collapse, as the quantum nature of the system "leaks" into the environment. That is, components of the wave function are decoupled from a coherent system, and acquire phases from their immediate surroundings.”

“Specifically, decoherence does not attempt to explain the measurement problem. Rather, decoherence provides an explanation for the transition of the system to a mixture of states that seem to correspond to those states observers perceive.”

“Decoherence does not provide a mechanism for the actual wave function collapse; rather it provides a mechanism for the appearance of wavefunction collapse. The quantum nature of the system is simply "leaked" into the environment so that a total superposition of the wavefunction still exists, but exists — at least for all practical purposes — beyond the realm of measurement.”

“Analysis of an actual experiment found that measurement alone (for example by a Geiger counter) is sufficient to collapse a quantum wave function before there is any conscious observation of the measurement. The view that the "observation" is taken when a particle from the nucleus hits the detector can be developed into objective collapse theories. The thought experiment requires an "unconscious observation" by the detector in order for magnification to occur. In contrast, the many worlds approach denies that collapse ever occurs.”

“In science, the term observer effect refers to changes that the act of observation will make on a phenomenon being observed. This is often the result of instruments that, by necessity, alter the state of what they measure in some manner. A commonplace example is checking the pressure in an automobile tire; this is difficult to do without letting out some of the air, thus changing the pressure. This effect can be observed in many domains of physics.

The observer effect on a physical process can often be reduced to insignificance by using better instruments or observation techniques. However in quantum mechanics, which deals with very small objects, it is not possible to observe a system without changing the system, so the observer must be considered part of the system being observed.”

Photon – a digital quantity of light

In wave function, its quanta can be variously conceptualized as being stretched in amplitude, frequency, and wavelength.

EACH DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE ENTANGLES WITH A DIFFERENT DERIVATIVE INTERPRETATON OF COSMIC SIGNIFICATION OUT OF COSMIC POTENTIALITY

Reality is DIGITAL?

Re Field of Iterations of Singular Unit, as assigned with values by subformulas being fluxed under a Top Formula
Differential equations and analysis of dimensional conversions

Sussing the Top Algorithm
The unit cannot itself be measured.
It is applied to express various qualities of dimensions which can be locally, relationally, relatively compared and measured.There seems to be no standard unit of beat, to which the cosmos synchronizes the passing of time.
Yet there abides a cosmic NOWNESS.

There is no unit of digital measure of distance which is not stretched or contracted, depending on point of view, relative frame of reference, and relational direction and speed of motion.

SUSSING:How may relative and proportionate field values be sussed out in any kind of consistency for the various qualities which we may measure?
Qualities such as mass, (M) matter, (E) energy, density, bindingness, statistical radiation, polarity, (C) charge, location, grid, speed, direction, vector, (S-T) separation in space-time, velocity, spin, frequency, amplitude, intensity, reactivity.
Thought experiment:
Assign an arbitrary 1 million value to the Singular Unit. For locally measurable expressions of measurable qualities, assign proportionate values based on convertibility.
E = Mass x SL sqd.
Etc.
Weight cross conversion values for different qualities of a field under consideration as a "standard field."
Thus gradually suss/solve for proportionate conversion values.
Assign "x" to unknown, to complete the 1 million value.
Eventually, solve for most proportionate and/or conversionary or inverse values among the variously measurable qualities. HOW DOES LIGHT AND RADIATION WORK??? SPECIAL FORMULAIC EXCHANGES? Trapping sub-formulas within a formula that constrains radiation. Is radiation discrete or continuous? Distances in time and space are granular in respect of discrete formulations. The ruling Algorithm is based on discretes.

If Universe comprised of sizeless units, then how does cosmic sum of such units, even if such sum would itself be sizeless, come to have capacity to avail expression of contextual and relational qualities and quantities of size and mass?
Even within a locally contexted organization of such units, if traversal of each unit would be infinitely insignificant, then how could any unit be relationally organized or charged to revolve, rotate, or roll in respect of any other?

Unless each separation, segment, or sequence in space or time is mathematically discrete (granularly quanticizeable), as opposed to an infinity of continuously smaller divisions, then by what means or formula could anyone reasonably hope to cross from any one point to another?If space and/or time are continuous and composed of an infinity of ever smaller building blocks, then how could any segment of either ever be reasonably conceptualized as the smallest segment?

Can God forget?

Are there limits to the Quantities that can be recorded or remembered under the System?

????Pauli exclusion principle -- bosons v fermions

When fermions occupy the same space-time point, are they really "there"? Do they add mass and density, or just values for facilitating mediating recombinations of annihilations of destructive interference of wave packets?

Bosons -- push pull exclude attract repel????

vibrations of will

wave packets of will

will -- Is mortal will renormalized so as to directly push pull sense other packets of mortal will, "as they really are"?