PURPOSE OF VOLATILITY AND CHANGE:
One appreciating holographic signs of emerging volatility may next learn to gamble on, exploit, or market such signs. Thus, emerging signs may come to cloak or take on human personalities. Some signs one may come to advertise or wear, sort of like clothes, making signs part of one’s style, even one’s persona or signifier of gang membership.
One comes to wonder: What is the Holographic-IT that seems to facilitate such signs? What are IT’s purposes? Where does IT deign to lead us? Where should IT be intuited to be leading us? What does one’s enlightened empathy lead one to intuit about IT’s purposes?
After all, how could IT not have purpose? Does not even lack of purpose entail a form of purpose? Does choosing not to decide not entail a form of choice?
Intuiting IT has purposes, one comes to inquire: What does one’s empathy or intuition suggest, regarding what are IT’s fiery urges and purposes? Surely, IT’s purposes entail something beyond fomenting conflicts, such as race conflicts, merely for the sake of fomenting conflicts. Surely, we are not doomed always to divide into opposing armies, each ordained to coalesce around bogus apparitions (such as skin color).
Must IT choose “peace,” merely in a sense of calm symmetry? Rather, must not there always be potential for volatility, boiling beneath the surface of even the calmest of seas? Otherwise, how could we distinguish or appreciate the calm?
Abstracting beyond peace, conflicts, and historical grudge-memes to be propagated and telescoped throughout space-time, does IT idealize “arts of change?” Predictably, even when those prone to practice gambling on volatility are not stirring things up by race baiting, must they not be conniving to “shake dice” to add overlays of volatility in some other way?
In respect of laws, checks, and balances, how should a moral civilization seek to fulfill its fiery urge for the “art of change?” Beyond laws, what remains essential to preserve a moral civilization from lapsing into evil?
As a civilization comes to believe its legal Constitution “lives,” but that God does not, does not Evil come to reign? As a civilization comes to foreclose God’s purposes to interpretations by mind-control freaks, rather than to each holographic-citizen’s individually evolving empathy and intuition, so also, does not Evil come to reign? Does not Evil opportune upon the foreclosing of all notions of “God” or “Enlightened Goodness” from one’s empathetic intuition?
****
Methods for conniving to "shake dice" to exacerbate VOLATILITY, in order to enhance positions for skilled control freaks and gamers:
Fear mongering.
Victim mongering.
Race baiting.
Hate inciting.
Media disinforming, propagandizing, persuading, and recruiting.
Greed inciting.
Inciting rumors of shortages and panic speculations.
Creating artificial shortages by market leveraging and cornering.
Political bribery and criminal force.
Partnering with empire builders and axis.
****
VOLATILITY:
Masters of advantage-seeking divine the direction of flow of volatility, predict the direction of volatility, manipulate the direction of volatility, advise those who manipulate the direction of volatility, and predict the advice of those who advise the manipulation of the direction of volatility.
Such masters predict, feint, divide, and rule the schemes of others for gaming on volatility. Thus do they master the “action-art of change.”
Such mastery is often leveraged in proportion to one’s secretive skill in sacrificing all other principles to a game for winning wealth and power out of artificially, dishonestly induced ebbs and flows of volatility. Capacity to acquire wealth and power by exploiting volatility may well correlate with Machiavellian skill for deception.
****
Does not Evil easily opportune upon the foreclosing of all notions of “God” or “Enlightened Goodness” from one’s empathetic intuition?
Finding yourself misled after following connivers, whom do you blame? And what do you learn?
Trust no blank slates; look to deeds as keys to character.
****
VOLATILITY:
All knowledge special to a perspective of Will is potentially powerful, precisely in respect that such knowledge is “inside information.”
What meaning or pattern would ever emerge, were no discriminatory choices ever made or willed?
Beyond physical conditioning, ultimately, one may seek to enlighten wilful choices in respect of a sort of received, or spiritual, empathy.
Thereby, one may season all choices with meaningfulness.
Thus, everyone plays with volatile choices, sort of like playing with fire.
Sometimes fire is good, sometimes not.
Everyone brings habits to bear while playing with volatility.
Some habits mark acquired good taste.
Some mark bigotry.
For the most disadvantaged and ignorant, bigotry may cloak a psychologically protective unity.
Democrats may feel their party marks good taste, while the Republican party marks bigotry.
Republicans may feel vice-versa.
But, both “good taste” and “bigotry” are forms of discrimination.
Some discrimination is good, some not.
Some choices are “good,” some not.
Yet, we have no choice but to make choices, based on “inside information.”
Will must will, and volatility is its home.
All, incorrigibly, must gamble with volatility.
Play the game, brother!
But season it with fellow empathy!
****
Were privacy and inside information once made public, how frantic, then, would become the games of volatility?
5 comments:
Regarding Volatility — see http://www.americanthinker.com/:
Given Russia's new aggressive foreign policy as seen by its invasion of Georgia, few can doubt that it will exploit the power of European gas dependency. The question is, how does the West blunt that power?
Regarding Words, Narratives, Emotionalism, Volatility, Media Exploitation, Manipulated Truth:
Compare http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=5904827E-C227-404E-83F3-E79B78AD3334 with narrative of “mainstream media.”
Volatility:
Abusing trust and position:
World Bank Fired Wolfowitz to Hide Corruption: Former Official
Friday, August 8, 2008 11:40 AM
By: Kenneth R. Timmerman
Snippets from http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/world_bank_wolfowitz/2008/08/08/120267.html:
Senior officials at the World Bank have admitted that the firing of former Bush administration official Paul Wolfowitz as World Bank president was a scheme to block an unpopular anti-corruption campaign he had championed, a former World Bank official told Newsmax.
“The stuff about his girlfriend was all contrived,” former World Bank official Steve Berkman told Newsmax. “It was a mini-scandal people at the Bank used to nail him.”
Senior World Bank managers and board members “didn’t like this guy from the get-go,” Berkman said. “He was going counter-current to the World Bank bureaucracy.”
Berkman has just published an expose of corruption, “The World Bank and the Gods of Lending,” based on his 16-year experience auditing World Bank projects, particularly in Africa.
The “gods of lending” in the title is a reference to the international bureaucrats who run the Bank, and believe “they can do no wrong,” Berkman writes.
They have created the myth that they are at the ‘cutting edge’ of development, while they hide the appalling number of failures within the Bank’s portfolio — failures that enrich the government elites of the Third World while creating mounds of debt that cannot be repaid.
It is this single truth that exposes the hypocrisy of the whole business: the Bank pretends it is lending for noble purposes, while the borrowers pretend they will put the money to good use.”
Instead, Berkman writes, World Bank funds are regularly “placed in the hands of officials with a history of looting national treasuries.”
From http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/08/john_mccain_picks_alaska_gov_s.html:
"I do believe that McCain has to do something to reshuffle the cards, shake up the establishment, do something unexpected and Governor Palin...has all the kinds of things that McCain might see as a way to shake things up," Clyburn said.
http://moneynews.newsmax.com/headlines/forbes_economy_crisis/2008/09/29/135732.html?s=al&promo_code=6BE0-1:
“The government had a big role in this,” Forbes said. “Yes, there was bad behavior on Wall Street. But by golly it couldn’t have reached the disastrous proportion it has without the crazy policies of Washington, the Federal Reserve, Congress, and I must say the White House.”
COMMENT: B.S.!!! Who believes Congress does anything to conflict with what its topmost tiers of Big Swinging D***’s and business and money puppeteers requires! The puppeteers actively promoted all this volatility and divisiveness, greased it, took advantage of it, and now complains that the government it greases gave it what it asked for! Chutzpah!
Post a Comment