(Click title above)
.
TAKE BACK AMERICA:
If America is to remain a force for defending and propagating “government of the people, by the people, and for the people,” then America must revitalize the intelligence and character of its electorate.
The fate of America and the world it leads must not be left to the easily manipulated whims of a dumbed down or easily corrupted electorate. To enfranchise the young, naïve, ignorant, illegal, alien, corrupt, or criminal is to foredoom us to the machinations of secret cabals of well connected and corrupt profiteers.
With no apologies, the franchise must no longer be availed to: those under 18 years of age, those without loyalty, attachment, or residence, and those without innocence of crimes of moral turpitude. Means must be established to verify the authenticity of votes and voters.
The alternative is not universal suffrage. The alternative is rule by machinations of corrupt cabals and their cynical owners of obviously monopolized media.
.
Mentally handicapped person forced to vote Democratic: See http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/10/mentally-handicapped-man-forced-to-vote.html.
.
WORLD HEGEMONY VS. NEW PARADIGM:
Apart from a country like the U.S., constrained as it is by a system of checks and balances and having a history and culture conditioned for respecting human freedom and dignity, what other country or system would be better, to project power in order to promote peace and stability worldwide?
No doubt, the American electorate often seems stupid and easily duped, and capitalistic corporations often seek profits that opportune in wars. So, has history, logic, or empiricism suggested any alternative country, federation, or system that would be better?
Well, apart from the U.S., what other country presents itself? Does not experience with the United Nations seem unpromising? So, what about an integrated power system that is guided and controlled at the top by a cohort of successful financial overlords, acting through their loyal, conditioned agents, presidents, generals, and minions? Well, not much in human experience, philosophy, or spiritual insight makes much of a good case for such a system.
Such a N.W.O system, of socialism directed by secret loyal cabals or well connected billionaires, may sometimes be called: community organizing, participatory democracy, progressive corporatism, corporate directed socialism, national socialism (Nazism), nomenklatura directed communism (USSR), or spiritually entranced mass mind diversion (Sharia law).
Regardless of what one may call a N.W.O. system, which is more likely: (1) that America will learn and improve as a world leader, or (2) that secret loyal international cabals will continue to respect the freedom and dignity of ordinary people?
But for America, what would have been the result from WWII, or the Cold War, or various regional slaughters and famines ever since?
But, does the question not become moot, if we allow America to fall under the N.W.O. control of a secret loyal international cabal (i.e., Beast)?
FOURTH REICH:
SAME OLD NATIONAL SOCIALISM:
SEDITION: See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedition:
Sedition is a term of law which refers to covert conduct, such as speech and organization, that is deemed by the legal authority as tending toward insurrection against the established order. Sedition often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority. Sedition may include any commotion, though not aimed at direct and open violence against the laws. Seditious words in writing are seditious libel.
****
INTERNATIONAL SOCIALISM:
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Society_Institute:
One of the aims of the OSI is the development of civil society organisations (e.g., charities, community groups and trade unions) to encouraging participation in democracy and society.”
PERSONAL COMMENT: This sounds a lot like Obama's Community Organizing [!], to bring about “democratic socialism” (where have we seen national socialism before?), aka “participatory democracy.” The “lie” inherent and hidden in such “O – society” notions is that they implicate power organized to the highest levels, for top-tier puppeteers to pull strings of all lower level community organizers (who may as well be called Nomenklatura of a communist-like party).
****
GEORGE SOROS AND THE “O-SOCIETY”:
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_soros:
In 2006, George Soros bought two million shares of Halliburton.
“Currently, Soros is chairman of Soros Fund Management and the Open Society Institute and is also a former member of the Board of Directors of the Council on Foreign Relations.”
“In the United States, he is known for having donated large sums of money in a failed effort to defeat President George W. Bush's bid for re-election in 2004. On BookTV, November 12, 2007, he said that he supports Barack Obama for the Democratic candidate in the 2008 election.”
“Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker wrote in 2003 in the foreword of Soros' book The Alchemy of Finance:
George Soros has made his mark as an enormously successful speculator, wise enough to largely withdraw when still way ahead of the game.”
“In 1997, during the Asian financial crisis, then Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir bin Mohamad accused Soros of using the wealth under his control to punish ASEAN for welcoming Myanmar as a member. Later, he called Soros a moron. Thai nationals have called Soros "an economic war rcriminal" who "sucks the blood from the people".”
“Soros' 2008 book, The New Paradigm for Financial Markets, describes a "superbubble" that has built up over the past 25 years and is now ready to collapse. This is the third in a series of books he's written that have predicted disaster. As he states:
I have a record of crying wolf…. I did it first in The Alchemy of Finance (in 1987), then in The Crisis of Global Capitalism (in 1998) and now in this book. So it's three books predicting disaster. (After) the boy cried wolf three times . . . the wolf really came.”
“According to National Review the Open Society Institute gave $20,000 in September 2002 to the Defense Committee of Lynne Stewart, the lawyer who has defended alleged terrorists in court and was sentenced to 2⅓ years in prison for "providing material support for a terrorist conspiracy" via a press conference for a client. An OSI spokeswoman said "it appeared to us at that time that there was a right-to-counsel issue worthy of our support."”
“… Dick Cheney accidentally referred to FactCheck.org as "factcheck.com" in the Vice Presidential debate, causing the owner of that domain to redirect all traffic to Soros's site.”
“After Bush's reelection in 2004, Soros and other wealthy liberal political donors backed a new political fundraising group called Democracy Alliance which aims to support the goals of the U.S. Democratic Party.”
“According to Neil Clark (writing in the New Statesman):
(t)he conventional view, shared by many on the left, is that socialism collapsed in eastern Europe because of its systemic weaknesses and the political elite's failure to build popular support.
That may be partly true, but Soros's role was crucial. From 1979, he distributed $3m a year to dissidents including Poland's Solidarity movement, Charter 77 in Czechoslovakia and Andrei Sakharov in the Soviet Union. In 1984, he founded his first Open Society Institute in Hungary and pumped millions of dollars into opposition movements and independent media.”
“His Open Society Institute is named after Popper's two volume work, The Open Society and Its Enemies, and Soros's ongoing philosophical commitment to the principle of fallibilism (that anything he believes may in fact be wrong, and is therefore to be questioned and improved) stems from Popper's philosophy.”
“Soros' writings focus heavily on the concept of reflexivity, where the biases of individuals enter into market transactions, potentially changing the fundamentals of the economy. Soros argues that such transitions in the fundamentals of the economy are typically marked by disequilibrium rather than equilibrium, and that the conventional economic theory of the market (the 'efficient market hypothesis') does not apply in these situations. Soros has popularized the concepts of dynamic disequilibrium, static disequilibrium, and near-equilibrium conditions.”
PERSONAL COMMENT --- LEARING HOW TO CREATE AND PREY ON BUBBLES AND VOLATILITY: Soros concept of reflexivity seems to relate to strategies for bringing about, and preying upon, bubbles and volatilty, both in economics and in politics.
“Soros blames many of the world's problems on the failures inherent in what he characterizes as market fundamentalism. His opposition to many aspects of globalization has made him a controversial figure.”
“In an interview regarding the economic crisis of 2008, Soros referred to it as the most serious crisis since the 1930s. According to Soros, market fundamentalism with its assumption that markets will correct themselves with no need for government intervention in financial affairs has been “some kind of an ideological excess”.”
****
SEDITION:
See http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200312/soros:
December 2003 ATLANTIC
A prominent financier argues that the heedless assertion of American power in the world resembles a financial bubble—and the moment of truth may be here.
by George Soros The Bubble of American Supremacy
.
COMMENT: SOROS WANTS AMERICAN HEGEMONY TO BE REPLACED BY THE HEGEMONY OF HIMSELF AND HIS COHORTS!
But, would not this be to replace a system of rule and responsibility based on representative election of American leaders, in a society with a history and culture for protecting representative governance, with an undemocratic and unrepresentative system for international rule by financial overlords and their cohorts?
For the masses, would this not be to trade freedom and dignity for cheap security and regimentation?
.
For gratifying profit lust, does not The Beast have both a left hand (socialistic dictatorship) and a right hand (war profiteering corporate capitalism)? How best should The Beast be checked and balanced?
.
****
SAME N.W.O. BEAST:
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Druckenmiller:
“Stanley Druckenmiller formerly managed money for George Soros, and now dedicates himself to work full time at Duquesne Capital which he founded in 1981. He is married to Dreyfus Corporation (a Mellon Financial Corporation subsidiary) manager Fiona Biggs, niece of former Morgan Stanley global investment strategist Barton Biggs.”
****
SAME N.W.O. BEAST:
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlyle_Group: Among members or advisers of the global private equity investment fund, the largest in the world, Carlyle Group, dealing in defense, energy, media, and U.S. mortgage backed securities, have been George Soros, George H.W. Bush, James A. Baker III, Donald Rumsfeld, Government of Abu Dhabi, and relatives among the bin Laden family.
****
COMMENT --- ONE AND THE SAME BEAST:
We have been ruled by the political fringes, and they are each an arm of the same beast, just camouflaged behind different sock puppets worn on each hand. The left puppet of the beast claims, in pretense, to want international socialism, while the right puppet abhors it. But both puppets are camouflaging a beast that is farming the rest of us.
Our farmed-leftists must learn that socialism is based primarily on a lie.
Our farmed-rightists must learn that allowing too great a gulf between haves and have nots undermines democracy.
Independents, able and willing to advocate "the truth," have a heavy rock to push. Yet, "one must imagine Sisyphus happy.”
COMMENT --- INTERNATIONAL FOURTH REICH:
Has George Soros come full circle, having survived the Nazis, now to impose their same concept upon the world, only under a different name, under financial overlords (Soros' cohorts) for pulling strings of militaries under many, rather than just one, Reich? It seems doubtful that Soros is a racist, but does he not seem intent upon maneuvering most of us to surrender our freedom and dignity in order to submit to the peace of his rule, aka, “Pax Soros”? Does this not seem eerily similar to Islamic and Nazi submission-based-fascism?
.
****
.
EUROPEAN STYLE FREE TAX MONEY:
Comment by BobF from http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/hey_plumber_joe_been_there_don.html:
"One thing the liberal socialists(Democrats) ignore in their headlong rush to be "like Europe" is that the reason socialist Europe looks so good is that America has propped Europe and the rest of the world up for 60 + years. It was necessary after WWII to have the Marshall plan and to provide for Europe's defense to stop the Soviet Union from swallowing western Europe. However, our continued policy of providing for their defense ever since has made European nations into very weak, socialist countries with a veneer of prosperity; that makes liberals think that socialism works. Socialism works as long as there is OPM ( Other People's Money) available, because socialism produces nothing but consumes everything."
8 comments:
Comment on http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/barack_obonaparte_man_of_desti.html:
"It seems as if Obama is utterly convinced he can do no wrong, and that Destiny is on his side."
Well, he has the support of Buffet and Soros, who is on the record for working to undermine the "bubble" of American power and hegemony. So, what's to doubt?
If America is to remain a force for defending and propagating “government of the people, by the people, and for the people,” then America must revitalize the intelligence and character of its electorate.
The fate of America and the world it leads must not be left to the easily manipulated whims of a dumbed down or easily corruped electorate. To enfranchise the young, naïve, ignorant, illegal, alien, corrupt, or criminal is to foredoom us to the machinations of secret cabals of well connected and corrupt profiteers.
With no apologies, the franchise must no longer be availed to: those under 18 years of age, without loyalty, attachment, or residence, without innocence of crimes of moral turpitude. Means must be established to verify the authenticity of votes and voters. The alternative is not universal suffrage.
The alternative is rule by machinations of corrupt cabals and their cynical owners of obviously monopolized media.
TAKE BACK AMERICA.
BTW: Why do the media and powers that be, perhaps including our Supreme Court, suppose it to be "racist" or a chilling of votes to insist on authenticity of votes and voters, yet do not consider it racist that Obama first obtained political office by challenging the authenticity of names on opponents' voter-petitions?
Rot on a Shakespearean scale has taken root far beyond Denmark!
It is not just the Left or the Right that fear a verifiable electorate that is restricted to those over 18 who are legal residents without felonies.
Rather, it is beasts behind the N.W.O., who fear and fight against a responsible electorate!
Some miscellaneous, interesting web stuff:
1) Mentally handicapped person forced to vote Democratic:
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/10/mentally-handicapped-man-forced-to-vote.html
COMMENT: This is why, to vote Democrat, it helps to be mentally handicapped.
****
2) EUROPEAN STYLE FREE TAX MONEY:
Comment by BobF from http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/hey_plumber_joe_been_there_don.html:
One thing the liberal socialists(Democrats) ignore in their headlong rush to be "like Europe" is that the reason socialist Europe looks so good is that America has propped Europe and the rest of the world up for 60 + years. It was necessary after WWII to have the Marshall plan and to provide for Europe's defense to stop the Soviet Union from swallowing western Europe. However, our continued policy of providing for their defense ever since has made European nations into very weak, socialist countries with a veneer of prosperity; that makes liberals think that socialism works. Socialism works as long as there is OPM ( Other People's Money) available, because socialism produces nothing but consumes everything.
COMMENT: This is why we defend Europe --- so they can tell us how inferior we are.
****
3) ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE:
Snippets from http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/industry/4287680.html?series=60:
"The first real AI would be something that we don't even understand," says Wright, "because we didn't program it. It will be more dissimilar in the way it thinks, than we are to a mouse."
….
There's no sense of alarm in Wright's voice when he describes this self-refining machine intelligence—no more than when he casually mentions the notion that, as technology progresses at an exponentially faster rate, towards the so-called singularity, any number of breakthroughs could, as he puts it, "cause the world to go extremely non-linear." When he provides, as classic examples, a computer AI taking over the world, or self-propagating nanobots turning everything into a grey goo, it's impossible to tell whether he's joking, or worried, or simply fascinated. But when he's asked whether that hyper-advanced AI would retain its knowledge of humanity, Wright says, "I would imagine that it can understand us. But the really scary part of this is that we don't know."
COMMENT: This comports with my intuition. I do not see how we can reasonably hope, bottom up, to reverse engineer human consciousness. If so, humanity will not be able to engineer human intelligence from the ground up.
Yet, conscious intelligence of a non-human sort may very well arise. However, when it does, it will not be as any human engineer expected. Any “expectation” or purposeful design of it, if any, will derive in respect of Something else. But that’s just my belief.
To Be A Patriotic American:
Why not begin with some meaningful concepts or definitions?
It seems probable that most Americans, and most patriotic Americans, tend: to respect the importance of freedom and dignity; to not favor one-dimensional brain conditioning of school children; to not favor unnecessary governmental restrictions of free expression; to not favor surrendering individual control or initiative to ideological controllers; to not favor the undermining of American traditions, institutions, or government by any and all means; to favor not imposing confiscatory taxes; to not justify imposing rules based only on ideologies that have never worked in practice; to not engage greater loyalty to a country or cause other than America; to favor defending borders; and to expect competent vetting by the Press of political candidates.
Those who are antithetical to such tendencies are probably contrary in their tendencies or patriotism to most Americans. Apparently, however, it is a major faux pas, or verboten shorthand, to suggest that any Leftist may be “unpatriotic” or “un-American,” as opposed to saying, in longer version, that such person “favors tendencies contrary to those of most patriotic Americans.”
Of course, many Leftists, such as Ayers and Wright, may very well tend: to wish most of us to surrender freedom and dignity to security and control; to favor schooling slanted towards leftism; to favor various speech codes, enhanced punishments for hate speech, and controls against profiling that may work against leftists; to favor rule by properly educated (indoctrinated) elites; to disfavor traditional, sacred, or middle-class stories and civically inspiring histories; to disfavor Constitutions rather than leftist judges; to favor governmental control over private initiative; to favor big government and the big taxes needed to fund it; to favor loyalty to those countries, entities, and sponsoring personages as may be most useful to the nomenklatura among leftists; to favor the spreading of leftist ideology over the defense of national borders; and to favor control of means of delivering information.
Apparently, one may still disagree with such Leftists, by pointing out how their ideologies, tendencies, and actions go against those of most Americans. But, they, and their cohort of controlled media, will be in high dudgeon should anyone DARE to suggest that they are unpatriotic or un-American!
Yet, they never seem to say in what particular respects they believe they are patriotic or American — except to scream they have bona fides because, being born in the U.S.A., they are as patriotic or American as anyone else. To which I say: If you mean to say something, please, define your terms.
What goofball posturing, the accusations about who’s an American or anti-American!
REGARDLESS, NOTE TO LEFTISTS: YES, YOU OFTEN DO TEND TO FAVOR TENDENCIES CONTRARY TO THOSE OF MOST PATRIOTIC AMERICANS. (For a listing, see above.) Why else must you so fascist-like hide and control your message and media?
Unraveling American Self-Reliance — Mexicanization of America:
http://www.newsmax.com/ruddy/ruddy_gop_survival/2008/10/27/144701.html:
For Republicans, changing demographics are worrisome. Minorities and immigrants like the idea of a big and benevolent government handing out benefits — the something-for-nothing boondoggles that the Democrats have reveled in since Franklin Roosevelt invented the concept.
If you give amnesty, which really means citizenship, to just 2 million or 3 million of the 12 million illegals here, the electoral map moves dramatically in favor of the Democratic Party. But there will be no reason why Obama and the Democrats won’t push for amnesty and citizenship for all 12 million.
....
Today, Texas is an anchor for the GOP nationally. But an Obama amnesty program will put that state solidly into the Democratic column. Florida and other smaller red states like Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico will become quite blue. Blue states, like California and New York, will get bluer.
****
New Socialist Media — Palin Negative Headlines:
See http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/palin_negative_headlines/2008/10/28/144911.html?s=al&promo_code=6F48-1
JOE BIDEN'S WARNING --- COLD WAR DECEPTION --- COLD WAR NOT REALLY OVER ---
RELENTLESSLY INDIFFERENT AND CRUEL WORLDWIDE PUSH TO SOCIALISTIC DICTATORSHIP:
Regarding long term, high expenditure by Russia of resources towards reshaping American academia, students, media, etc., see: http://www.dailymotion.com – Dailymotion – Yuri Bezmenov.
Among the steps of (1) demoralization, (2) destabilization, (3) crisis, and (4) normalization (socialist emplacement), steps (1) and (2) have been going on in America for quite some time! The tipping points, at (3) and (4), are close upon us.
Against this, we cannot beat something with nothing.
And America, presently, has nothing.
First, America does not do a good job of inculcating civic appreciation of American values. Rather, “education” is geared towards impractical, feminine, pie-in-sky, everyone-play-nice values, with little admiration extended to manly defense.
Second, American institutions and academia provide virtually nothing to encourage citizens or students to turn to traditional Judeo-Christian values. Rather, traditional values are being rapidly undermined.
Again, America cannot beat something with nothing.
Comment by Dlanor, at http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/11/obama_is_hitler_hold_on_a_seco.html:
REGARDING JOE BIDEN’S WARNING:
Regarding long term, high expenditures by Russia and/or international cohorts of resources towards reshaping American academia, students, media, etc., see: http://www.dailymotion.com – Dailymotion – Yuri Bezmenov.
Among the steps of (1) demoralization, (2) destabilization, (3) crisis, and (4) socialist re-normalization, steps (1) and (2) have been going on in America for quite some time. Now, the tipping points, at (3) and (4), seem quite close upon us.
Against this, we cannot beat something with nothing. And, America, presently, has essentially nothing.
First, America does not do a good job of inculcating civic appreciation of American values. Rather, “education” from media and academia reinforces feminine, pie-in-sky, everybody-play-nice, code-pink, “multicultural values,” with little admiration extended to “American values” or to manly defense.
Second, American institutions and academia provide virtually nothing to encourage citizens or students to trust to traditional values, as contextualized in Judeo-Christian metaphors and sacred stories. Rather, traditional values are being rapidly undermined.
Again, America cannot beat something with nothing.
Even now, American leaders seem content and unready to offer resistance to the liberal fascism of Bush and Obama that is tipping us ever closer to catastrophe.
Apart from Reagan (and Palin?), from whom have we enjoyed any visionary (or real) leadership for defining and defending America, as America? Why do we blithely assume the Cold War is over and that American representative governance is safe? Are no signs yet shouting to us?
REGARDING COLD WAR:
Comment by Dlanor, at http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/shadow_world_resurgent_russia.html:
Much rings true; some rings false. It rings false to prescribe freedom while prescribing the sort of “globalism” that would erase America. One ought not imply that America should decline to enforce its physical borders or immigration policies. Nor that America should decline to seek energy independence. Nor that America should decline to favor competitive, American-based industries. Such implications do not sit well. Apart from that, well and good.
I very much doubt that powers at highest echelons care very much about any grand philosophy or principles or whether we have (or think we have) market-monopoly fascism, socialist fascism, or religious fascism. I suspect, apart from trained lip service, that the default philosophy of those of greatest power is based more on evolving opportunism and fascist will to power.
Opportunism (like evolution?) flourishes as masses are herded and kept divided, confused, misinformed, indoctrinated, anxious, and niche-dependent.
There is an alternative philosophy to will to power, which I refer to as will to math. However, its structure is far less formally regimented and is perhaps preserved only by an intellectual samurai (sort of like the founding fathers).
In any event, I like the conceptualization in the article, subject to some qualms about giving a pass to globalism at the expense of erasing an America of free, self-reliant thinkers.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/shadow_world_resurgent_russia.html:
Chandler examines these attempts in the media, education, government and national security. Further, he outlines how the global, anti-war movement is also aligned with the conspiracy against the West to undermine Western values and institutions and pursue a one-world government overseen by the United Nations. The United States is further under siege by Islamists, who also seek the destruction of the United States.
….
Gramscian cultural Marxism, based on the work of Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci, stems from the recognition that the structure of capitalist society was defined by the culture, faith and values of Christianity. Recognizing the central role of Christianity as the moral and cultural foundation of Western society, Gramsci endeavored to transform society by replacing the worship of God with the worship of man, "secular humanism." Gramsci was intent on destroying the "hegemony" of Christianity and its vast societal influences, including in government, education, media and the family. He sought creation of re-education and indoctrination programs to bring about a new moral and intellectual order based on Marxism.
….
When the Soviet Union collapsed, TNI advocated environmental issues to slow economic growth and hasten the disarming of the West. IPS and TNI work with a cadre of intellectuals, journalists, professors, politicians and government officials who support and promulgate cultural Marxism by manipulating public opinion and structuring policies and legislation to undermine the government, subvert the U.S. Constitution and aid in the transformation and radicalization of U.S. institutions. The IPS has successfully advanced a laundry list of taxpayer-financed entitlement programs under the cover of "equality and fairness," endeavored to limit corporate power and damaged U.S. military supremacy by working to cut military and intelligence spending.
….
Schools and universities have become politically correct tools of the Left, teaching "social justice" rather than encouraging the development of critical thinking skills though the analysis of diverse points of view. Students are schooled in the "correct thoughts" and historical revisionism reigns supreme. Those who voice dissenting opinions are subjected to taunts of racism and homophobia. While America is demonized as imperialist and oppressive, Communism is glorified and Communist atrocities are whitewashed. The outright attempt is to radicalize students and recruit them in the pursuit of destroying American culture.
….
Progressive-socialist-Marxists also use America's democracy to lead the country toward acceptance of socialism. They exert tremendous influence on the liberal-dominated Democratic Party. Under the cover of "equality and fairness" the Left has attempted to use its influence to support politicians and policies that limit corporate power and undermine U.S. military and intelligence. The IPS has injected itself into the political process and changed the political culture of the Democratic Party. Through the Congressional Progressive Caucus, an IPS affiliate, it has amassed a base of 72 out of 232 members of the House (almost one-third) that promote its policies on immigration, fair trade, military spending and other issues dear to the progressive-Socialist-Marxist agenda.
In recent years, the "Shadow Party" -- a nationwide network of unions, non-profits groups and think tanks that subscribe to leftist ideology and receive funding from billionaire George Soros -- has infiltrated the Democratic Party. Their goal is to take control of U.S. politics using a strategy that includes think tanks, training centers and media centers. Using the radical, community-organizing methods of Saul Alinksy, they have engaged in questionable fundraising tactics, aggressive voter drives, oppositional research and media manipulation as they push a hard-left line of racial and sexual equality, abortion on demand, class inequity, drug legalization, anti-war positions, assaults on sovereignty and global taxation and government.
….
Using retired veteran officers to legitimize their propaganda, Marxist media tools have gone so far as to slander the military, release sensitive documents to the press, publish the locations of U.S. nuclear weapons around the world and reveal nuclear secrets and classified national security codes. During the 2004 election campaign, the IPS was behind the false accusations of military atrocities in Vietnam that were discredited by the testimony of the Swift Boat Veterans. IPS and its affiliates have written studies critical of government intelligence services and collected information on corporate and private security services. Its assaults against the FBI and CIA, responsible for constructing the pre-9/11 wall between law enforcement and intelligence, have endangered Americans.
Under the guise of fighting against civil liberties violations and with the aid of affiliates such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the National Lawyers Guild (NLG) and the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), the IPS has hamstrung the efforts of the FBI and CIA, interfered with incarceration and proceedings against enemy combatants and undermined public support for the armed forces and armament programs. The IPS and its legal fronts have abused the Freedom of Information Act to mine government documents for secrets and to extrapolate important security and military information that they have passed on to Russian intelligence.
….
In their adherence to the Gramsican formula for anti-capitalist social transformation, the progressive-socialist-Marxists have co-opted with the United Nations to advocate world governance in the interest of "world peace, human rights and environmental preservation." This is the desired end result of their efforts to undermine American heritage, destroy Christianity and conspire against free-market democracy to achieve global taxation, the end of sovereignty, a world military and an international criminal court.
….
The soldiers of this world-government ideology and the agents of the United Nations are the non-governmental organizations (NGO's), accountable to no one but whose aim is to supplant national sovereignty with U.N. programs. Over 3,000 NGO's take over where governments fall short. They have increasingly monopolized international meetings, rejected democracies and free market systems while pushing environmentalism, multiculturalism, wealth redistribution and nuclear disarmament. They have tried to shift the focus of world attention to humanitarian needs over national security concerns. But their real agenda of opposing the West is revealed by their attacks on Western militaries and their silence on de facto terrorist groups that provide terrorist training to children and indoctrinate them to hate.
Post a Comment