.
Without a progressive consumption tax, capitalism will continue to jump the shark:
Once international big money pirates gain a headlock on everyone else, why imagine they would release such head lock to allow any fair minded businessperson to compete? So long as international loopholes free big money pirates, why should they care whether anyone else is precluded by socialistic regulations from competing? Why expect international financial pirates can be reduced to a level playing field without imposing progressive consumption taxes against them?
Once international big money pirates gain a headlock on everyone else, why imagine they would release such head lock to allow any fair minded businessperson to compete? So long as international loopholes free big money pirates, why should they care whether anyone else is precluded by socialistic regulations from competing? Why expect international financial pirates can be reduced to a level playing field without imposing progressive consumption taxes against them?
.
UBER NOMENKLATURA:
Ultimate Play On Volatility (to consolidate rule of Uber-Nomenklatura):
See http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/10/bidens_generated_crisis.html.
Joys of rule by socialists, communist party, hacks, and nomenklatura --- see:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UO1c6hRGpYU;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcVDzcP_pgg
Joys of recruiting socialist and uninformed voters --- see:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyvqhdllXgU.
UBER NOMENKLATURA:
Ultimate Play On Volatility (to consolidate rule of Uber-Nomenklatura):
See http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/10/bidens_generated_crisis.html.
Joys of rule by socialists, communist party, hacks, and nomenklatura --- see:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UO1c6hRGpYU;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JcVDzcP_pgg
Joys of recruiting socialist and uninformed voters --- see:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyvqhdllXgU.
18 comments:
OK, NOW THEY’RE GETTING SCARY
(Reminds me of the Halloween after the Cuban Missile Crisis):
More Obama Radical Connections — See:
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/31740_Khalidi_Tape_News-_The_Guest_List;
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/31731_Zombie-_Barack_Obamas_Close_Encounter_with_the_Weather_Underground.
Ultimate Play On Volatility (to consolidate rule of Uber-Nomenklatura) — See:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/10/bidens_generated_crisis.html.
Comment by Dlanor, in http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/dreams_from_frank_marshall_dav.html:
Newsflash: People are not angels. No matter how much we may deceive ourselves in hope that “we are the ones we have been waiting for,” we are not about to govern ourselves in primary respect of “the greater good of all.”
For our governance, we need checks and balances, sort of like a competition in the market place of ideas.
When we surrender our marketplace checks and balances to “the greater good of all,” we do not suddenly become angels. Rather, we only create a vacuum, which in instantly filled by another sort of rule.
Extreme liberalism and socialism are not about everyone suddenly becoming good to each other. They are about replacing individual freedom and dignity in a competitive marketplace with rule by a cold, opportunistic nomenklatura.
As Soros might say, it’s just the next bubble. Hate to burst the bubble of the do-goody socialists!
Comment by Richard Saunders, at http://comments.americanthinker.com/read/42323/226891.html:
Dreams inherited from other Strange Guys in Obama's neighborhood.
The Father: Barak Obama Senior
[gregransom.com]
Barack Obama's father, a Harvard trained economist, attacked the economic proposals of [Kenya’s] pro-Western 'third way" leader Tom Mboya from the socialist left, siding with communist-allied leader Oginga Odinga.
The author is given as "Barak H. Obama" and his paper is titled "Problems Facing Our Socialism", published July, 1965 in the East African Journal. Barak Senior proposed the following communist agenda for Kenya;
1. Obama advocated the communal ownership of land and the forced confiscation of privately controlled land, as part of a forced "development plan", an important element of his attack on the government's advocacy of private ownership, land titles, and property registration. (p. 29)
2. Obama advocated the nationalization of "European" and "Asian" owned enterprises, including hotels, with the control of these operations handed over to the "indigenous" black population. (pp. 32 -33)
3. Obama advocated dramatically increasing taxation on "the rich" even up to the 100% level.
4. Obama advocated government owned and operated "model farms" as a means of teaching modern farming techniques to farmers.
5. Obama contrasts the ill-defined and weak-tea notion of "African Socialism" negatively with the well-defined ideology of "scientific socialism", i.e. communism. Obama views "African Socialism" pioneers like Nkrumah, Nyerere, and Toure as having diverted only "a little" from the capitalist system. (p. 26)
The Mother: Ann Dunham
[en.metapedia.org]
During Obama's campaign for the 2008 Presidential Election he portrayed his mother as a conservative girl from Kansas; however in reality she was a radical leftist and Cultural Marxist. She lived in the Seattle area; spending her teenage years in Seattle’s coffee shops with other young leftist radicals. Obama claims his mother's family were conservative Methodists or Baptists from Kansas. However his mother's parents were members of a left wing Unitarian Church near Seattle. The church located in Bellevue was nicknamed "the little red church," because of its communist leanings.
The school Ann attended, Mercer Island High School, was a hotbed of pro-Marxist radical teachers. John Stenhouse, board member, told the House Un-American Activities Subcommittee that he had been a member of the Communist Party USA and this school has a number of Marxists on it's staff. Two teachers at this school, Val Foubert and Jim Wichterman, both Frankfurt School style Marxists, taught a critical theory curriculum to students which included; rejection of societal norms, attacks on Christianity, the traditional family, and assigned readings by Karl Marx. The hallway between Foubert’s and Wichterman classrooms was sometimes called "anarchy ally."
The Grandfather: Stanley Armour Dunham
[www.americanthinker.com]
Stanley Armour Dunham was “progressive” enough to enroll his daughter Ann in Mercer Island High and introduced his grandson Barack to Frank Marshall Davis.
The mentor: Frank Marshall Davis
[www.aim.org]
However, through Frank Marshall Davis, Obama had an admitted relationship with someone who was publicly identified as a member of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA). The record shows that Obama was in Hawaii from 1971-1979, where, at some point in time, he developed a close relationship, almost like a son, with Davis, listening to his "poetry" and getting advice on his career path. But Obama, in his book, Dreams From My Father, refers to him repeatedly as just "Frank."
The reason is apparent: Davis was a known communist who belonged to a party subservient to the Soviet Union. In fact, the 1951 report of the Commission on Subversive Activities to the Legislature of the Territory of Hawaii identified him as a CPUSA member. What's more, anti-communist congressional committees, including the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), accused Davis of involvement in several communist-front organizations.
Community Organizer Guru: Saul Alinsky
[www.americanthinker.com]
Obama answered a help-wanted ad for a position as a community organizer for the Developing Communities Project (DCP) of the Calumet Community Religious Conference (CCRC) in Chicago. Both the CCRC and the DCP were built on the Alinsky model of community agitation, wherein paid organizers learned how to "rub raw the sores of discontent," in Alinsky's words.
The agitator's job, according to Alinsky, is first to bring folks to the "realization" that they are indeed miserable, that their misery is the fault of unresponsive governments or greedy corporations, then help them to bond together to demand what they deserve, and to make such an almighty stink that the dastardly governments and corporations will see imminent "self-interest" in granting whatever it is that will cause the harassment to cease.
In these methods, euphemistically labeled "community organizing," Obama had a four-year education, which he often says was the best education he ever got anywhere.
The Preacher: Jeremiah Wright
[www.independentconservative.com]
We have prayerfully called the wisdom of all past generations of suffering Blacks for guidance in fashioning an instrument of Black self-determination, the Black Value System.
Commitment of God (read that again: not “Commitment to God” but ““Commitment of God”)
The God of our weary years will give us the strength to give up prayerful passivism and become Black Christian Activist, soldiers for Black freedom and the dignity of all humankind.
Disavowal of the Pursuit of Middleclassness
Classic methodology on control of captives teaches that captors must keep the captive ignorant educationally, but trained sufficiently well to serve the system. Also, the captors must be able to identify the ?talented tenth? of those subjugated, especially those who show promise of providing the kind of leadership that might threaten the captor?s control.
The Terrorist Educator: Bill Ayers
Is there anyone who doesn’t know about Bill the Terrorist Education Specialist?
[www.city-journal.org]
*************
Comment by Dlanor:
Re --- Ward P. Deaton, Jr. ("I do not think the MSM and Hollywood are all a flutter over Mr. Obama because he is a nice looking, well dressed, and articulate black man who is a little liberal. Those who are covering all this up are closet Marxists who are waiting until after the election (assuming Obama will win) to expose themselves for who they really are. ")
You give them too much credit. I think many of them are more like ignorant, cheap sluts, who simply know who pimps their bread, fixes their addictions, and tells them how sweet and elite they are. These are the folks who lecture everyone else about generosity of spirit and unselfishness. And, if you disagree with their party line, they will sic you as being selfish, mean, ignorant, or racist. In any event, they are never going to expose themselves for what they plainly are. Rather, they will just refashion ever more gaudy news-speak.
Regardless of who is elected, we ought by now to have received a hard, loud wake up call. There is some major headcase-busting and housecleaning to do!
See comment by Dlanor at http://www.creators.com/opinion/susan-estrich/the-final-days-2008-10-31.html:
What ignorant, stinky poo! I served in the Army with blacks. I try cases with blacks as co-counsel. My daughters date blacks. My cousins have married blacks. And, I dislike Republican economic philosophy --- because what we really need is not a progressive income tax, but a progressive consumption tax. Big difference!
Regardless, my voting against Obama is based on a lot of VERY SUBSTANTIVE reasons, in terms of fundamental defense, fundamental freedom, and fundamental economics.
In my judgment:
1) Obama has no executive or military experience, and I have detected no reason to trust him in the least to be Commander in Chief.
2) Soros wants to burst the bubble of American supremacy to replace it with a bubble of supremacy by a cohort of international pirates of volatility, and Obama is just their frontman.
3) Obama overvalues social security and shared misery over individual freedom and dignity.
4) Obama's social and family values are the same as for most secular humanist democrats, which is to say, he has no values at all for which he can draw or defend any hard lines.
5) Obama wants to erase physical, national borders, as well as civilizing, moral, family borders.
6) Obama's religion is a front for black redistributionist "justice." (I call it like it is; if any group is racist, consider the percentage of blacks voting for Obama for no specific reason they can explain, other than his skin color.)
7) Most Americans share a fundamental love for individual freedom and responsibility, which rate rather low among Obama's priorities.
8) Obama's social and economic policies are not calculated to help lift Mexico to American middle classness, but to reduce America to Mexican style poverty.
Bottom line: I don't give a crap about Obama's skin color! I am very tired of inexperienced, academic bubble-brains suggesting I must be stupid, mean, or racist to oppose Obama.
Frankly, my dear, I oppose both McCain and Obama. I want someone with guts and charisma enough to lead us to a progressive consumption tax. I voted for McCain only because the damage he likely will do will not be as deep or long lasting as the damage Obama would do.
Why won't anyone in media or academia advocate for a progressive consumption tax?
Well, the same people who want to be in charge of the next Obama fronted nomenklatura tend to be the same people who own and run media and academia, now mainly comprised of a mess of cheap sluts for the pimps who own them and tell them how sweet and elite they are.
If this country blows, it will not be over racism, but over a fundamental dispute about whether everyone should be entitled to liberty or to a free lunch. Now, if it should ever come to bullets, given this Country's history, just which side do you think will prevail?
Grow up!
See: http://objllc.com/USSA.htm.
Family, spiritual values:
See http://www.thejudeo-christianview.com/
Debunking nasty rumors:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/15106.html
Snippets from http://townhall.com/Columnists/WyntonHall/2008/10/31/obamas_spiral_of_silence:
…Mr. Obama has ridden a mediated tidal wave of support through the jaw-dropping imbalance of positive news coverage his campaign has received. If the Spiral of Silence thesis is accurate, this means that the lopsided liberal coverage—not Mr. Obama’s race—will have been responsible for silencing support for Senator McCain in national polls.
….
… should Mr. Obama lose the election or win it with narrower than expected margins, we can be sure that those in the mainstream media and Mr. Obama’s supporters (one in the same, really) will ignore the Spiral of Silence in favor of the so-called “Bradley Effect.”
As with so much else in this presidential election, liberals will not allow “facts” to get in the way Mr. Obama’s messianic message.
See http://iowahawk.typepad.com/iowahawk/2008/10/as-a-conservative-i-must-say-i-do-quite-like-the-cut-of-this-obama-fellows-jib.html.
Stealth Radical --- see:
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YjdjY2Y2YWU5YjQ1Y2Y5Mzg0MGRlNDQ4YTkwYmI2ZDE=
See http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-billionaires1-2008nov01,0,5761563.story.
Neophyte Nomenklatura vs, Uber nomenklatura (Biden's Prophecy?:
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/forecast-for-latin-america-cold-war-winds-from-russia/.
N.W.O. DISEASE AND PIRACY --- DEMISE OF AMERICA, CONSTITUTION, FREE SPEECH, AND SHAME OF MEDIA AND ACADEMIA:
Snippets from http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=1EA31CC9-67EE-4C61-B7D2-CD6694347B18:
Academia Endorses Bill Ayers
By Orit T. Sklar
FrontPageMagazine.com
October 31, 2008
….
As of October 30, no less than 4,090 names appeared in a testament of support for Bill Ayers from the higher education community. Their statement emphasized, “We, the undersigned, stand on the side of education as an enterprise devoted to human inquiry, enlightenment, and liberation.
JOE BIDEN'S WARNING --- COLD WAR DECEPTION --- COLD WAR NOT REALLY OVER ---
RELENTLESSLY INDIFFERENT AND CRUEL WORLDWIDE PUSH TO SOCIALISTIC DICTATORSHIP:
Regarding long term, high expenditure by Russia of resources towards reshaping American academia, students, media, etc., see: http://www.dailymotion.com – Dailymotion – Yuri Bezmenov.
Among the steps of (1) demoralization, (2) destabilization, (3) crisis, and (4) normalization (socialist emplacement), steps (1) and (2) have been going on in America for quite some time! The tipping points, at (3) and (4), are close upon us.
Against this, we cannot beat something with nothing.
And America, presently, has nothing.
First, America does not do a good job of inculcating civic appreciation of American values. Rather, “education” is geared towards impractical, feminine, pie-in-sky, everyone-play-nice values, with little admiration extended to manly defense.
Second, American institutions and academia provide virtually nothing to encourage citizens or students to turn to traditional Judeo-Christian values. Rather, traditional values are being rapidly undermined.
Again, America cannot beat something with nothing.
Neo-Cold War: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/21/opinion/21young.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin.
Comment by Dlanor, at http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/how_the_nyt_could_save_itself.html:
Re: Fascist Romance
Lee -- Missouri Ozarks ("This fascist romance of "Big Government" and "Giant Multi National Corporations" (the Mussilini Fascism model) was first aired by President Dwight D Eisenhower speaking of the then "Military-Industrial Complex). It is alive and well, take a good look at what has led up to, and what is going on, between the US government and big business.")
I agree. If we could recognize and restrain the real enemy (the "fascist romance"), we would be able to do more than shadow box. But, so long as MEDIA, academia, and government are in the tanks of fascist international corporatism, it will be far from easy to escape that crab tank. (Although, that just makes the challenge more interesting!)
Escape would entail: (1) Identifying the problem; (2) better educating the public (including college students)about the "American Idea"; and (3) progressively restoring control of the propagation of goods and ideas either to real MARKETS or to some more direct form of oversight by the people (maybe some sort of aggressively progressive, confiscatory tax on the consumption of political influence).
But, what could inspire such a new Great Awakening?
Until then, fascist international corporatism will continue to erode America until most of the world is reduced to whimpering milk cows.
REGARDING COLD WAR:
Comment by Dlanor, at http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/shadow_world_resurgent_russia.html:
Much rings true; some rings false. It rings false to prescribe freedom while prescribing the sort of “globalism” that would erase America. One ought not imply that America should decline to enforce its physical borders or immigration policies. Nor that America should decline to seek energy independence. Nor that America should decline to favor competitive, American-based industries. Such implications do not sit well. Apart from that, well and good.
I very much doubt that powers at highest echelons care very much about any grand philosophy or principles or whether we have (or think we have) market-monopoly fascism, socialist fascism, or religious fascism. I suspect, apart from trained lip service, that the default philosophy of those of greatest power is based more on evolving opportunism and fascist will to power.
Opportunism (like evolution?) flourishes as masses are herded and kept divided, confused, misinformed, indoctrinated, anxious, and niche-dependent.
There is an alternative philosophy to will to power, which I refer to as will to math. However, its structure is far less formally regimented and is perhaps preserved only by an intellectual samurai (sort of like the founding fathers).
In any event, I like the conceptualization in the article, subject to some qualms about giving a pass to globalism at the expense of erasing an America of free, self-reliant thinkers.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/shadow_world_resurgent_russia.html:
Chandler examines these attempts in the media, education, government and national security. Further, he outlines how the global, anti-war movement is also aligned with the conspiracy against the West to undermine Western values and institutions and pursue a one-world government overseen by the United Nations. The United States is further under siege by Islamists, who also seek the destruction of the United States.
….
Gramscian cultural Marxism, based on the work of Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci, stems from the recognition that the structure of capitalist society was defined by the culture, faith and values of Christianity. Recognizing the central role of Christianity as the moral and cultural foundation of Western society, Gramsci endeavored to transform society by replacing the worship of God with the worship of man, "secular humanism." Gramsci was intent on destroying the "hegemony" of Christianity and its vast societal influences, including in government, education, media and the family. He sought creation of re-education and indoctrination programs to bring about a new moral and intellectual order based on Marxism.
….
When the Soviet Union collapsed, TNI advocated environmental issues to slow economic growth and hasten the disarming of the West. IPS and TNI work with a cadre of intellectuals, journalists, professors, politicians and government officials who support and promulgate cultural Marxism by manipulating public opinion and structuring policies and legislation to undermine the government, subvert the U.S. Constitution and aid in the transformation and radicalization of U.S. institutions. The IPS has successfully advanced a laundry list of taxpayer-financed entitlement programs under the cover of "equality and fairness," endeavored to limit corporate power and damaged U.S. military supremacy by working to cut military and intelligence spending.
….
Schools and universities have become politically correct tools of the Left, teaching "social justice" rather than encouraging the development of critical thinking skills though the analysis of diverse points of view. Students are schooled in the "correct thoughts" and historical revisionism reigns supreme. Those who voice dissenting opinions are subjected to taunts of racism and homophobia. While America is demonized as imperialist and oppressive, Communism is glorified and Communist atrocities are whitewashed. The outright attempt is to radicalize students and recruit them in the pursuit of destroying American culture.
….
Progressive-socialist-Marxists also use America's democracy to lead the country toward acceptance of socialism. They exert tremendous influence on the liberal-dominated Democratic Party. Under the cover of "equality and fairness" the Left has attempted to use its influence to support politicians and policies that limit corporate power and undermine U.S. military and intelligence. The IPS has injected itself into the political process and changed the political culture of the Democratic Party. Through the Congressional Progressive Caucus, an IPS affiliate, it has amassed a base of 72 out of 232 members of the House (almost one-third) that promote its policies on immigration, fair trade, military spending and other issues dear to the progressive-Socialist-Marxist agenda.
In recent years, the "Shadow Party" -- a nationwide network of unions, non-profits groups and think tanks that subscribe to leftist ideology and receive funding from billionaire George Soros -- has infiltrated the Democratic Party. Their goal is to take control of U.S. politics using a strategy that includes think tanks, training centers and media centers. Using the radical, community-organizing methods of Saul Alinksy, they have engaged in questionable fundraising tactics, aggressive voter drives, oppositional research and media manipulation as they push a hard-left line of racial and sexual equality, abortion on demand, class inequity, drug legalization, anti-war positions, assaults on sovereignty and global taxation and government.
….
Using retired veteran officers to legitimize their propaganda, Marxist media tools have gone so far as to slander the military, release sensitive documents to the press, publish the locations of U.S. nuclear weapons around the world and reveal nuclear secrets and classified national security codes. During the 2004 election campaign, the IPS was behind the false accusations of military atrocities in Vietnam that were discredited by the testimony of the Swift Boat Veterans. IPS and its affiliates have written studies critical of government intelligence services and collected information on corporate and private security services. Its assaults against the FBI and CIA, responsible for constructing the pre-9/11 wall between law enforcement and intelligence, have endangered Americans.
Under the guise of fighting against civil liberties violations and with the aid of affiliates such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the National Lawyers Guild (NLG) and the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), the IPS has hamstrung the efforts of the FBI and CIA, interfered with incarceration and proceedings against enemy combatants and undermined public support for the armed forces and armament programs. The IPS and its legal fronts have abused the Freedom of Information Act to mine government documents for secrets and to extrapolate important security and military information that they have passed on to Russian intelligence.
….
In their adherence to the Gramsican formula for anti-capitalist social transformation, the progressive-socialist-Marxists have co-opted with the United Nations to advocate world governance in the interest of "world peace, human rights and environmental preservation." This is the desired end result of their efforts to undermine American heritage, destroy Christianity and conspire against free-market democracy to achieve global taxation, the end of sovereignty, a world military and an international criminal court.
….
The soldiers of this world-government ideology and the agents of the United Nations are the non-governmental organizations (NGO's), accountable to no one but whose aim is to supplant national sovereignty with U.N. programs. Over 3,000 NGO's take over where governments fall short. They have increasingly monopolized international meetings, rejected democracies and free market systems while pushing environmentalism, multiculturalism, wealth redistribution and nuclear disarmament. They have tried to shift the focus of world attention to humanitarian needs over national security concerns. But their real agenda of opposing the West is revealed by their attacks on Western militaries and their silence on de facto terrorist groups that provide terrorist training to children and indoctrinate them to hate.
MAN WHO WOULD BE KING:
Comment by Dlanor, at http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/the_odd_story_of_romance_in_dr.html:
To Rich, re: "For sake of argument lets assume this piece is 100% correct, as I suspect it is....
Then does it matter beyond our own self doubt about ourselves for letting this election happen the way it did?
Sadly, no."
********
Well, to me, it matters a great deal indeed! In that, I hardly think I am rare. This is an issue that may well become, in essence, statistically proved. Were that to sink in, "change" will come. That change may be akin to the tipping point depicted in "The Man Who Would Be King," when the native asked something to the effect of, "What sort of God is he who bleeds?"
Sure, die-hard Libs will continue to want to be deceived. But an angry majority will not. A clear majority may not clamor for more blood, but their honeymoon will end, and they may clamor for impeachment. Likely, radical change will become more limited.
The romantic fate of all advocacy for "the greater good" in trade for abandoning self-reliance is to serve a masquerade for evil. The sooner this masquerade ends, the better.
*****
PSYCHOPATHIC CHARLATANS:
Comment by Dlanor, at http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/hindus_jews_and_jihad_terror_i.html:
Psychic Dice (“Although some Hindus still kill Christians in India, most live and let live. They, along with the Sikhs, are our allies against militant Islam. The next the word "raghead" pops into your consciousness, try to figure out whether you are dealing with a militant Islamic thug or a Sikh.”)
John Galt (“The Muslims have a saying. "First the Satuday people, then the Sunday people")
******
An encompassing pattern is emerging. We incline too much to believe the Arab adage, “the enemy of my enemy is my friend,” is most diligently practiced among Arabs.
In fact, that adage is practiced by all who find themselves either in desperate straits or in an agitated state of unrequited ambition. We hope the ambition of America is generally restricted to nurturing a civilized world.
Regardless, the ambition of dictators (i.e., charlatans of “the greater good”) tends to be more blood-curdling hungry. I often wonder why Russia and China play so much footsie with dictatorial Islamic counterparts. Well, weighing friends in a world filled with psychopathically ambitious charlatans is not sport for the feint hearted.
******
MARCH TO SOCIALISM:
Snipped comment by John, at http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/making_the_world_safe_for_marx.html:
This is a very important article, and must be circulated widely. I believe Randall Hoven has articulated exactly what many, many Americans believe, and fear. The infrastructure to implement the planks of Communism has been completed. As a student of revolutionary change, either violent or non-violent, there must be control of certain critical cultural "levers." Of course the challenge is how does a minority gain acceptance over the majority. The seven key cultural levers to control:
1. Media. Newspapers, magazines, television, radio (the "Fairness" Doctrine will address this one)
2. Entertainment, most especially movie, documentary just like Joseph Goebbels found invaluable.
3. Religion must be marginalized so the state can assume the vacuum. As Stalin found to be critical.
4. Schools, high schools, and colleges and indoctrinate, "re-educate" the youth. Like the N. Vietnamese.
5. Family structure breakdown down, redefined to be ambiguous so the state can assume the vacuum.
6. Judicial system with a few well paced radical judges to legislate doctrine from the bench.
7. Labor unions to control and extort critical industries for economic leverage and crisis making.
With the above infrastructure in place it is possible to set the following conditions:
1. Uninformed, and misinformed population. Distort, misrepresent, and suppress information.
2. Establish new icons to reinforce new values, attitudes and beliefs. John Wayne vs. Alex Baldwin.
3. Remove moral and organized opposition. Remember Poland and Pope John Paul II?
4. Rewrite history, espouse the virtues of Marxism vs. evil corporations. "MTV says Marxism is cool"
5. Weaken the family authority and influence on values. Aryes Annenberg "experiment" was just this.
6. Overturn the Constitution without the need for majority legislation, and enact the above items.
7. Lessen the power of capital engines (corporations), control segments of the economy / voting blocks.
With these seven "levers" in place, all that's needed is an "incident" or "crisis" to cause the launch. Something big like the current financial crisis we are experiencing. Unveiled a month before the presidential elections, created by the Marxists through enactment of the Community Reconstruction Act, and nurtured to a magnitude of national and global disaster. This concept is right out of Barack Obama's and Hillary Clinton's mentor, Marxist Saul ALinsky. Rhoam Emmanuel recently said that we must not waste the opportunity of this crisis . .
With a "dumbed down", uninformed, and misinformed population, a "smoke and mirrors" presidential campaign can be successful if a charismatic candidate, regardless of credentials and qualifications, could be presented. The Marxist have been waiting, that's why they called Obama "The One." With enough money, a little luck, and the above seven levers in place, the plan to move the United State of America to a Marxist country is in its end game. All this happened with most Americans not having a clue. The Republicans brought a knife to a gun fight.
This is how we got in the situation we are in. With a close to 60 Democrat majority, it's all but certain we will move Socialist under a Marxist ideology. Things are going to happen that will shock and anger many Americans, but there won't be a thing that can be done. Much damage will occur to the land of the free, that won't be even partly undone for a long, long time, if ever. The American people made a big, big mistake by not doing their civic duty of learning about the candidates. Each specific voting block, that put Obama into office could only see "what's in it for me?", "who will I get the most from?" Worse yet "who looks the coolest?" Americans did not vote as Americans, for the common good. American Idol voter mentality. "Checkmate" was called on November 4th, 2008 by the Marxist who planned the strategy, George Soros, Peter Davis, and George Lakeoff, with their front man Barack Obama. That's exactly my point, we are playing bingo, they were playing chess. God bless and help the United States of America.
*********
MARCH TO DICTATORSHIP:
Comment by Dlanor, at http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/shadow_world_resurgent_russia.html:
To Loosegravel:
"Take a look around the world at the nation states that proclaim themselves to be communist. China? If Marx were alive today would he describe China as a communist utopia? Is the prolatariat in control of the state? Is government withering away? It appears that they've embraced capitalism with open arms. In fact, much of their industry appears to be guility of the kind of labor abuse that was prevalent in England and the United States the period of their industrial revolution when the robber barons appeared.
How about Cuba. Now there's a real communist utopia. To each what he needs. You betcha! How is the prolatariat doing there and again, is the government withering away? The condition of the masses in terms of living standards appear to be something short of utopia. And Fidel Castro's one man rule for decades does not resemble anything that Carl Marx had in mind.
Communism doesn't exist. Dictatorial governments do and they are run by the same kind of people that have always run those kinds of governments. There is not a successful communistic government on the face of the planet, not one. However, there are a slew of governments that do their best to gain power and then keep it by the ruthless use of force. And to do so they proclaim that they are communistic and acting in the interests of the masses. It's crystal clear that the interests of the masses seem to always suffer in comparison to the interests of the ruling elite and in every case the government somehow seems to increase its authority and power and not the opposite. And these governments are in no way ruled by the prolatariat as theorized by Marx.
Calling these countries communist is nuts! They should be called what they are and that's just out and out dictatorships. Whether the dictators hide behind religiosity or poltical/religous idiologies such as communism makes little or no difference. The result is the same. Our enemies are nations who intend us harm and what they call themselves doesn't matter, only their intentions do. "
*******
Well put! Regimes based primarily on socialism are FRAUDS.
Their rulers do not care whether their rulings are handed down based on their interpretation of religious authority or on their interpretation of the greatest good --- either way, unless you're the lead dog, the end result of their rule is the same old dreary view.
Likewise, those personages with "power behind the throne " with control over captive media and to whom big government is beholden need not worry so much about whomever happens to be the government's figurehead.
In all shapes, the "greatest good for the community" is less a governing principle than a slogan for psychopaths, for cloaking evil that is used to mislead and benumb the masses. In reality, the "greatest good" becomes newspeak for that which serves the real ruler's whims.
A society that really wants opportunity to pursue the "greatest good" needs the liberty for its citizens that is availed by market-like checks and balances. The government that is best tends to be the one that restricts liberty only to the extent that markets have shown themselves to be otherwise unable to advance civilization or to preserve competition.
We may never get the greatest good. But we can get opportunity to pursue it --- unless, in greed or ignorance or timidity, we trade our liberty with Big Governors in exchange for their false promises to change and enrich us from the wealth of others.
******
RESISTANCE:
Comment by Dlanor, at http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/the_more_things_change.html:
The best way to help Obama spread success, notwithstanding his announced leftist "hard-wiring," is to hope for peace with him while preparing for war.
To prevail, family-friendly civilization, ultimately, must win on a battlefield of ideas, where clarity of voice is given through insistently reasoned examples and discourse --- in votes, visits to representatives, media, debates, talks, pamphlets, flyers, and counter protests.
We must not shy from identifying and tracking the enemy to his lair. Somehow, we must institutionalize and impose something like "term limits," especially to protect us against those who pretend authority on behalf of communities to impose politically-correct community-thought and invasively bureaucratic obeisance upon the rest of us.
Ultimately, we must re-set free markets and representative governance by imposing confiscatory consumption taxes against so-called "liberal" billionaires of no discernible patriotic loyalty to the extent they use and abuse their wealth by applying it for gaming disproportionate, "off-the-charts," political influence and invasive social control.
We must recruit enough non-Marxist women, blacks, Hispanics, Jews, and non-anarchic gays to take the victimhood card away from Obama'ites. Certainly, we do not win by making Obama some sort of martyr for weak minded admirers of Che Guevara.
Those with enough mental horsepower and vigor must join the debate and counter-organize the rest of us. Those with minds and nerves less quick, but with energetic and solid, intuitive grasp of our challenges must dedicate their time and presence.
Regardless, networks of intelligence must be established, to anticipate and root out fascist community shenanigans. Effective means for fielding volunteers to respond to such intelligence must be organized.
We have already identified most of our institutional bastions and newspapers that propagate the fascist community. Local groups, if willing, could easily respond in pickets, waves, and internet chains to each outbreak of fascist propaganda. Surely, some charismatic college students must be bright and vigorous enough to lead student counter-groups to shame the fascist onslaught and its professoriate.
If free-thinkers do not rise to the occasion, we will be reduced to the same level as fascist and socialist slitherers. On battlefields, our forebears made grave sacrifices for our liberty, which are continued even now by our troops in the field. Do we honor their sacrifices, or shame them in trade for Twinkies?
******
INTERNATIONAL SOCIALIST FINANCING:
Comment by Dlanor, at http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/11/obama_wants_more_money_from_hi.html:
If Obama's egalitarian goal, by winks and nods, is to reduce America to status as just another member of the U.N., is he not guaranteed to reap mountains of foreign money? Regardless of citizenship of presidential candidates, when America can no longer be relied upon to assimilate loyalty to America, the enemy may as well be at the gates. To hope for peace respecting Obamaites, we must prepare for war --- and war it may come to.
For Fascism, Islamic Style --- see http://newcriterion.com:81/articles.cfm/whats-in-a-name-3602; http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/legendary_songwriter_now_march.html.
Comment by Dlanor, at http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/legendary_songwriter_now_march.html:
The underhanded and dishonest techniques used by Fanatic Religious Fascists are remarkably similar to those of Secular Marxist Fascists. The deformed minds of fascists may own the night, but their ideas cannot stand the light of day. Fascists may own the underground of anarchic violence, but free thinkers own the world of civilizing ideas. While the hidden deceits of mind-controllers (i.e., Vladimir the Mind Reducer) avail an infinity of tricks and escapes, the light of free thinkers avails a disinfecting eternity of hounds. Sic ‘em!
Post a Comment