Sunday, October 12, 2008

EMERGENT EMPIRE OF EVIL FARMERS

(click title above)

.

APOSTLES (from Jesus Christ Superstar, by Andrew Lloyd Webber):
Always hoped that I'd be an apostle.
Knew that I would make it if I tried.
Then when we retire, we can write the Gospels,
So they'll still talk about us when we've died.

POLITICAL APOLOGIES:
Always hoped that I’d be a farmed chicken.
Knew that I would make it if I tried.
Then when Soros comes, he can Bar-B-Que my pippin,
On greased remains Barack’s feast will be fried.
.

Among prospects for Community Organizers, what character traits are sought or prized, if not traits for broadcasting blame against one’s country for not having provided all that to which one felt (by greed?) entitled?


Chicken Feed
Originally uploaded by Victor Keech

RESURGENT EMPIRE OF EVIL FARMERS:

To finance and enforce an empire that has emerged out of loyalty to Ponzi-based greed, Obama, The Fed, and Big International Money are now constantly on the prowl for replacing and recruiting “talented soldiers” (i.e., greedy, callous people who feel “entitled” and who are smart enough to know whom to obey) in their cause, whom they are set to reward with financial pillage and patronage.

This EVIL SYSTEM, having corrupted all our political parties and many of our politicians, has now:

1) Taken over all important means of media-based dissemination of advertising, entertainment, and information, as well as means of academia-based “education” and indoctrination;

2) Enlisted support from masses by making big lying promises and by feeding romantic feelings of entitlement;

3) Undermined representative governance by corrupting voters and voter lists;

4) Corrupted politicians with threats and bribes;

5) Perfected Orwellian techniques for undermining coherent public discourse;

6) Used The Fed to perfect banking techniques for turning ordinary citizens into debt slaves;

7) Used the World Bank to perfect techniques for making loans to stealing dictators, knowing the third world countries they control will never be able to get out from under such debts, which were undertaken to facilitate their leaders’ thefts;

8) Weakened governmental competitors, nations, tribes, and families by undermining borders and by teaching children to hate their countries, histories, cultures, and religions;

9) Reduced most worldwide economies to the influence of the American Dollar, thus to enhance proportionate power of those who control The Fed;

10) Weakened all other competitors by employing hard-wired, structural advantages of position for playing on volatility, fear, and greed;

11) Laid low the American Dollar and America's influence.

BECAUSE OUR SELF-SELECTED FARMERS HAVE ALREADY BEEN CORRUPTED TO BELIEVE IT IS GOOD THAT THE REST OF US SHOULD BE FARMED, WE ALSO ARE NOW BEING CONDITIONED TO BELIEVE IT IS GOOD.

THIS EVIL HAS DEVOLVED LESS FROM THE FOUNDATION OF AMERICA, BUT MORE FROM THE GREED THAT DEVOLVED WHEN THE FED WAS CREATED AND WHEN OUR “ENTITLEMENT GENERATIONS” SEVERED THEIR BONDS WITH RESPONSIBILITY.

****

THE MONEY MASTERS:

See snippets from http://www.themoneymasters.com/faqs.htm:

…. 6% interest on the nearly trillion dollars in bonds it now owns provides the Fed with roughly $50 billion in revenue. With this money the Fed (1) pays some money to its private banks stockholders, (2) uses some to create giant unaudited slush funds to manipulate currency and stock markets (ostensibly to help avoid economic crises such as the one we are currently in), and (3) then takes out whatever it wishes - without any Congressional oversight or external audit - for expenses, salaries, perks, jets, lavish parties, etc.. The rest it returns to the US Treasury. In this manner the Federal Reserve operates independently of our elected Congress and external oversight.

….

[The Fed] is concentrating the wealth of the nation in fewer and fewer hands as they create over 90% of our new money, year after year, and receive the interest tribute on it from the American people to whom they have loaned it. Deficits fuel the fire of economic injustice by requiring borrowing which requires new money creation, by the private banks. Wars fuel deficits. Conflicts and fear fuel wars. The mass media fuels conflicts and fear. The bankers own and/or control the mass media. Full circle.

….

… that most Americans are now debt slaves on the continent their great, great, great, grandfathers conquered. The bankers own it all, or very nearly so.

….

… Besides the concentration of wealth into fewer and fewer hands it causes, fractional reserve banking is the primary cause of the inherent instability in our economic system and of its boom-bust “cycles.”

….

Soon, very soon, America will consist - like the 3rd world countries - of only the very few very rich and the very many very poor.

… Let’s sum up: The Federal Reserve consists of 12 regional banks, the stock of which is owned and the Boards controlled by the member banks, which are privately owned bank corporations. These institutions receive 6% profit on their funds paid into the Fed, rain or shine, peace or war (sometimes more).

The Federal Reserve Board of Governors is an independent (its own word) entity “within” the government (i.e., something much like an independent, internal parasite in a host organism), with 14 year, reform-proof terms (i.e., only one of 7 can be replaced every two years).

The Fed was deliberately designed to appear as a sort of government body to hide the fact that it is a private banking cartel whose member banks share in the vast profits of seigniorage (i.e., the difference between the cost of printing/minting or otherwise creating money [a few cents per $100], and its face value). Yes, the Department of the Treasury does still mint our coins (at the US mint) but that represents under 1% of the US money supply, the great bulk of which is simply bankbook entries - electronic keyboard impulses in computer memories - created by banks on-the-spot to fund loans they make in response to loans applications their "customers" submit (hence the competition by banks for your loan applications and credit card borrowing).

….

The Federal Reserve Notes we all accept as currency (there are no U.S. Notes printed since passage of the ill-advised, 1994 Reigle Act abolished Lincoln's greenbacks) are actually sold to the Fed at the cost of printing - a few cents per sheet - by the Treasury Department Bureau of Engraving and Printing. Seigniorage is properly a benefit solely to government (and indirectly then to the people) - not to private bankers - that the Federal Reserve Act, passed by misrepresentation and deception, transferred to the bankers. Thus, rather than the government receiving the vast benefits of creating all of our money, private banks create over 98% of our money supply - literally billions of dollars annually - and pocket the interest charged on loaning that new money, as their private profit. Our government is left with only the insignificant seigniorage from minting coins.

Since the bankers actually wanted to control the new, national central bank (called the Federal Reserve Banks), to accomplish this they had to make it appear governmental, which accounts for the occasional use of the term quasi-govenmental, to describe this governmental facade. This also explains the construction of the Federal Reserve headquarters building on the Mall in Washington, DC, right in the midst of the authentically governmental buildings there.

The real problem is, thus, not the Fed itself (it only makes about 2% of the money supply – the base for the rest), it’s the private banks that, pursuant to the fractional reserve banking authorized by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, make/create-from-nothing-for-their-private-profit the other roughly 98% of the US money supply. The Fed is just a quasi-governmental smokescreen (and central organizing body) for the private banking cartel's money-creation operation.

*******

See also: http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/whofed.html; http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/faq/faqfrs.htm; http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/faq/faqfrs.htm#5.

*****

BTW: Electing McCain, without much more, will only delay the match striking for a short time. If we wish to remain worthy of being called “Americans,” much more urgent housecleaning and revitalizing of checks and balances has now become essential.

****

See also: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/10/post_125.html;
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/10/06/the-missing-snl-bailout-skit-and-the-soros-connection/;
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/how-subprime-money-funds-the-dem-left;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=epE9lk0xj68;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaABV1CWXug;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzAcM8CqxLM;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U58a42USAKc.

.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Quite interesting stuff about The Fed:

http://www.themoneymasters.com/faqs.htm

Anonymous said...

EVIL POWER LUST — DEMOCRAT STYLE N.W.O.:

Snippets from http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/10/negative_advertising.html:
October 14, 2008
Negative Advertising vs. 'Real Issues'
By Thomas Sowell

One of the oldest phenomena of American elections-- criticism of one's opponent-- has in recent times been stigmatized by much of the media as "negative advertising."

....

In words, Obama is a uniter instead of a divider. In deeds, he has spent years promoting polarization. That is what a "community organizer" does, creating a sense of grievance, envy and resentment, in order to mobilize political action to get more of the taxpayers' money or to force banks to lend to people they don't consider good risks, as the community organizing group ACORN did.

After Barack Obama moved beyond the role of a community organizer, he promoted the same polarization in his other roles.

That is what he did when he spent the money of the Woods Fund bankrolling programs to spread the politics of grievance and resentment into the schools. That is what he did when he spent the taxpayers' money bankrolling the grievance and resentment ideology of Michael Pfleger.

When Barack Obama donated $20,000 to Jeremiah Wright, does anyone imagine that he was unaware that Wright was the epitome of grievance, envy and resentment hype? Or were Wright's sermons too subtle for Obama to pick up that message?

How subtle is "Goddamn America!"?

Yet those in the media who deplore "negative advertising" regard it as unseemly to dig up ugly facts instead of sticking to the beautiful rhetoric of an election year. The oft-repeated mantra is that we should trick to the "real issues."

....

Does anyone in real life put more faith in what people say than in what they do? A few gullible people do-- and they often get deceived and defrauded big time.

Barack Obama has carried election-year makeovers to a new high, presenting himself a uniter of people, someone reaching across the partisan divide and the racial divide-- after decades of promoting polarization in each of his successive roles and each of his choices of political allies.

Yet the media treat exposing a fraudulent election-year image as far worse than letting someone acquire the powers of the highest office in the land through sheer deception.


*****************************************


EVIL POWER LUST — REPUBLICAN STYLE N.W.O.:

Snippets from http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/10/socialist_charges_from_bailout.html:
October 14, 2008
The GOP Is a Mess and a Fraud
By Eugene Robinson

....

After eight years of the Bush administration, the Republican Party -- to put it bluntly -- is a mess and a fraud.

There is an intellectual case to be made for the economic philosophy that the party purports to represent. I disagree with it strongly, but I respect its integrity -- in a way that this administration and the Republican leadership in Congress clearly did not.

The Republican Party said it believed in free and unfettered competition, but it picked winners and losers through a system of crony capitalism. All it takes to make my point is a name: Jack Abramoff.

The Bush tax cuts, which heavily favored the wealthy, showed that the president and his allies in Congress didn't believe in progressive taxation. I think that's outrageous, but the administration goes further and actually seems to prefer a regressive tax scheme. That's the only explanation I can think of for why hedge fund managers making hundreds of millions of dollars a year pay taxes at a lower rate than their chauffeurs.

Now that it's election time, the party -- as usual -- is trying to convince Americans that it stands on the side of the little guy. Sarah Palin has been trotted out to convince everyone that the party cares deeply about the eternal roster of cultural issues -- God, guns, gays, abortion, etc. If McCain and Palin were elected, the party would doubtless return these issues to the storage locker until the next election, at which point they would be dusted off once more.

Oh, and isn't the Republican Party supposed to stand foursquare against intrusions on privacy? Then why were Republicans so unmoved when it was revealed that the Bush administration had been conducting unprecedented surveillance of Americans' private electronic communications?

When Ronald Reagan was president, I had a sense of what ideas and principles his party stood for. When Newt Gingrich and his "Contract with America" brigade took Washington by storm in 1994, I knew what they believed -- loopy though it was -- and what they hoped to accomplish. I defy anyone to give a coherent explanation of what today's Republican Party, under George Bush and now John McCain, wants to do except perpetuate itself in power.

When a political party reaches the point of lurching incoherence, the most effective cure is a good, long spell in the wilderness. Americans should help Republicans out by sending them home to get their act together.

Anonymous said...

Obama: See http://townhall.com/Columnists/LauraHollis/2008/10/16/time_to_use_the_c_word.

Anonymous said...

Indoctrination --- see: http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/professors-indoctrinating-students-not-in-our-university/.

Secular Morality --- see: http://pajamasmedia.com/victordavishanson/blagatrocious/.

Anonymous said...

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/12/obama_from_unitarian_to_libera_1.html:

Well, what other humanistically-centered faith institution would you choose, if:

Your political position were already secured;
your faith were primarily in yourself and a cohort of similarly-minded rulers;
you felt yourself elite and visionary enough to prescribe or dictate roles for the socialistically-deceived masses of "equals";
you saw no value in individual freedom of expression or enterprise among the irresponsible masses;
you saw no value in family-centered traditions for marriage or for raising children;
you saw no need ever to defend traditional social institutions against depraved encroachments of the State;
your faith consisted mainly in whatever institutions and interest-groups happen to be supportive within evolving political niches;
you had no real faith in an interactive God; and
you sought opportunistic cover of faith, aided by MSM, only to appeal to masses?

Duh!