It won't be long before we'll have technology to make all ID cards superfluous. Machines will sense who you are by the shape of your eyes and nose, your fingerprints, retina marks, and dna. If you volunteer for it, your fingerprints will even become your debit card. Airport waiting lines will be eliminated. Think of the possibilities for efficiency! Oh, how that will be great!
Well, so long as only Conservatives of good sense are elected from here on out. Ought oh! Fat chance that will happen! All the efficiency that would help a benign, small government serve us will help a malignant, big government terrorize us. Once Big Sis is always watching, there goes creativity, initiative, privacy, brainstorming, freedom ... and happiness.
Problem is, declining a national ID is not going to stop the trend. Once the mind police and the jihadi zombies, twits, and pirates make it their business to expedite the last Imam by setting off nukes in order to kill off all independent thinking, countless millions will beg the new world mafia (NWM) to implement a worldwide ID network.
I think we have two choices: (1) Assimilate and defend a culture that is friendly to individual freedom and dignity, or (2) surrender and submit to international NWM totalitarianism.
I don't think there is a third choice. That is, I don't think we can have both multi culti rot and freedom and dignity. One or the other will prevail in America. If multi culti rot prevails, then it's off to the NWM with us. And once we pass that point of no return, a national or worldwide ID card will be superfluous ... because technology will advance so as to accomplish the same thing, sans the card.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
A core of Americans still believes in individual liberty. It has assumed that most other people also prize liberty. That is wrong. Many people and cultures, whatever they prize, do not prize liberty. Bush was wrong thinking all people want democracy. For prizing liberty, America was an aberration -- an aberration that will perish if Americans fail to appreciate that we are not like the rest of the world, nor should we wish to be so. If we want to preserve liberty so that it does not perish, we cannot afford to swamp ourselves with cultures whose values repel liberty. Obama and his ilk are not changing America. They are destroying America. Whatever they are changing us into, it is not American. It is death to liberty. The time for rethinking multi culti rot is here with a vengeance. If we don't even value a culture of liberty enough to preserve it against being diluted into vapor, we will not be able to defend it against any savvy and determined foe. This is not about color or race -- it's about culture and values. If we don't respect any cultural values, we won't be preserving any, either.
Lines are crumbling ... won't be long before marijuana is totally legal. Contemporaneously, mj will become an entitlement. If not, it will be passed out by the Acorn people -- just far enough from the voting booth to be legal. Talk about a draw to get out the Dim vote! Especially if you tell them to bring back proof of voting in order to get a free refill!
There is no such thing as freedom that is completely devoid of law. If law does not at least defend borders and sanity, it can't defend anything.
Compromise: Make marijuana legal for adults; but make any significant trace of it a disqualifier from voting. What better evidence of lack of civic responsibility?
Obama is Aleck Hoag. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_alec:
“"Melinda would make her victim lay his clothes, as he took them off, upon a chair at the head of the bed near the secret panel, and then take him to her arms and closely draw the curtains of the bed. As soon as everything was right and the dupe not likely to heed outside noises, the traitress would give a cough, and the faithful Aleck (sic) would slily (sic) enter, rifle the pockets of every farthing or valuable thing, and finally disappear as mysteriously as he entered." The victim was then persuaded to leave in a hurry through a window by Alec banging on the door, pretending to be an aggrieved husband who had suddenly returned from a trip away.”
Frank would reach across the aisle to encourage Uncle Sam to expose his position by buying bigger houses than he could afford, alert Goldman Sachs to hedge its credit default swaps, signal Soros behind the secret panel, and then take Uncle Sam to his arms and draw the curtains. As soon as Uncle Sam was not likely to heed outside noises, the traitor would give a cough, and the faithful Aleck Bama would slyly rifle the pockets of every valuable thing. The Gang of 14 would then persuade America to trade in its clunkers as Aleck Bama banged loudly on the door, pretending to be aggrieved.
From A.T. -- Re: "The students were not antiwar as much as they were anti-draft -- far more focused on self-preservation than on idealism."
Those who are most easily angered by perceived affronts to their senses of entitlement are quickest to presume all other Americans must be self indulgent troublemakers. Because they know themselves to be self indulgent, they project to presume America must be evil. What they fail to apprehend is that many Americans are not raised by over indulgent or primarily absent parents.
What we are seeing is not the rise of a new world secular order of syndicated, extra-territorial oligarchs, aristocrats, and mullahs, but the rise of a New World Mafia (“NWM”), or Crime, Inc. A NWO may not necessarily need a mark to freeze and plunder, but a NWM does.
White Male Euros – you are that mark. By accepting Darwinian group selection and by becoming so professorially house broken as to allow balances of republican power to rot, you have allowed yourselves to be neutered for that role. And who has led the way to accept the neutering of white male Euros? Could it be the Yale-Harvard phalanx?
Could the greatest country ever have been beaten down by any clowns faster than the well connected bumblers we have routinely taken from Yal-ard and ensconced in high office? Who are the twits who score these people and say they are well qualified to lead America? By what insane measure are people who hardly relate to real Americans thought to be best qualified to lead America? Egad! Until we put them in diapers and stand them in corners, they will continue to recognize and promote one another at all costs. Rot has rolled to fill a niche, and will admit none other.
I wonder: Does British law prevent any passionate political position that is loudly expressed in opposition to the regime from being prosecuted by the regime as "hate speech?" What if the loyal opposition really does hate the political position of the regime? For example, I know that I positively hate most of the Obama admin's agenda. In fact, I really, really, positively hate any agenda that undermines the general right of Americans to pursue life, liberty, and happiness (by seeking to trump individuals with what elitists think is called for by the make-believe "greater good"). So, is it hate speech for me to say so? Regardless, are Brits now going to enforce their anti hate speech agenda against Muslim preachers? If a nation's lawmakers want to reduce their population to quislings, they might at least try to be consistent about it. How many more people are going to be put on the list with Michael Savage for being "banned in Britain?"
A charge of disorderly conduct should suffice for your concern, should it not? Why brand, escalate, or emphasize "hate speech," except to deploy the apparatus of the State for purposes of forcing mind and thought control? Do we only have free speech for those topics that have not yet been placed by the ruling regime on whatever list of "thou shalt not's" that it may have compiled in order to pay back on political promises made to those special groups that have invested in it?
Re: America is not perfect; just the best thing going.
I would add this: There is no mortal perfection on earth! (Here I imagine Ned Beatty, thundering "You will atone!" in the movie Network.) Perfection is one of those odd concepts, like infinity. Along the number scale, do you ever "really" get any closer or further from infinity? Well, maybe a mathematician will appear and simplify this for us, to reconcile Zeno's paradox, continuality, particularity, and transfiguration.
Regardless, I suspect that no matter how much "progress" we think we make, the challenges that remain before us will always transform, reconfigure, and recede, in perpetuity, plenty far enough to test our faith, imagination, and industry, much like a rainbow. So to look at how much further it appears we need to go to reach perfection and to use that as justification for tearing down America, the one nation that honors the pursuit of happiness above all others ... well, that is just plainly and simply adolescent nonsense! If not out and out evil.
Real Americans know one another, and they know superficialities don't factor! So who are the racists, misogynists, greedbags, and green-eyed back-stabbing flatterers? Hmmm? mmm mmm mmm.
*****
The problem with progressive socialism is that it must devalue most individuals to a make-believe greater good. The consequence is that most people are reduced to the role of children or pets. They may be led to believe they elect their masters, but that is less true than that children elect their parents. The problem with being a child in perpetuity is that many parents are not worthy to be masters in perpetuity. The problem with being a pet is that many masters enjoy pitting their pets in skinner boxes or fight rings.
In socialistic societies, there is hardly room for interaction among adults. There is no such thing as moral growth – only repressive parents and stifled children, in perpetuity. Even the masters become prisoners, for they have no hope of ever relinquishing their need to control the masses. Surely, there is no such thing as checks and balances, for the day to day power is on the side of the masters. In this kind of god forsaken system, there is no limit this side of decency to constrain rule over, or growth in, the peasants.
The good of free enterprise is that it allows people to become adults.
Post a Comment