Religious Mind Rot:
A Muslim who succeeds in framing another as an apostate likely acquires a kind of power, built on fear. Like a made man, or a "man of honor," who must not be messed with. So prey are looked for, even to frame, if necessary. But since the question of belief or apostasy is so inherently subjective, a predator must look for prey who can be easily defeated. Even though the proof is subjective, it is easier than proving a superstition, such as whether one is a witch who communes with the actual body of a devil. Still, if one accuses the wrong (more powerfully connected) fanatic, one may find the tables turned. So of course no Muslim will accuse an ambivalent President of apostasy.
The more objective question is this: What would Obama do any differently if he in fact were a Muslim?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Once Islamists sees the West run from defending its ally, they (and other collectivist financiers, i.e., communists) will calculate that there is much more that we will run from defending. Once we retreat this dastardly, throwing an ally of Western freedom under the bus, how do we ever again muster an orderly stand? Or even an orderly retreat? If we stand for nothing but what is convenient, how do we stand much longer, at all? Obama is a collectivist abettor, and he wants to facilitate our running. This un-American, traitor-communist liar needs to be impeached at the first opportune moment.
Post a Comment