Obama's Base:
African-Americans: Many black citizens support Obama because their worldview is: society victimized them; society must pay; they are now and forever entitled to be paid; and Obama understands their material entitlements because he is black.
Other Hyphenated-Americans: Many hyphenated citizens from South of the border and the third world support Obama because their worldview is: American style capitalism has imperialistically victimized them; America took matters that should be theirs; America is too weak to stop them, collectively, from taking it back; and Obama understands that capitalism and America’s power are illegitimate.
Collectivist Americans: Many collectivist-minded religious fascists and social-libertines (aka, useful idiots) support Obama because their worldview is: capitalism has victimized the world; capitalists take what is not rightfully theirs; capitalism is morally weak and illegitimate; and Obama understands that capitalism is materialistically unfair and morally and environmentally indefensible.
Narcissists and Sociopaths: Many elite narcissists and sociopathic opportunists support Obama because their worldview is: do-gooders are easily robbed and enslaved by pretending to feel their pain; there would be more reliable security for themselves and less turmoil in the world were its material wealth to be carved into corporatist territories, to be milked and ruled by a hierarchical syndicate of elites; science and natural selection dictate that the most ruthlessly elite must rule the easily deceived meek; and Obama is a prince among deceivers.
Obama’s Base: That’s Obama’s ideological base: Blacks, hyphenated Americans, useful idiots, and sociopathic opportunists. Factually, this materialistically envious base will always suffer setbacks under Obama-like rule. This is because Obama-like rule is fundamentally based on a lie, i.e., that there is no transcendentally existent basis for assimilating values and empathies higher than crass materialism. Nevertheless, the greater part of Obama’s base will always remain ideologically blinkered and envious. Defeating the Obama base will remain a herculean task for the foreseeable future. Obama will come and go. But the materialistically blinkered and amoral base for which he is a façade will long lurk in shadows and under rocks ... even as, in hyphenated pretense of being "Americans," they presently run most of our institutions.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
In death, all particular perspectives of consciousness must eventually become collateral damage from the unfolding purposes of the field of consciousness. Our material world is not the best of all possible; we are only its gardeners, always pursuing communion, and perhaps eventual merger, with a happier state of being.
My Blog List
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(171)
-
▼
June
(42)
- Religious Literalism and Fundamentalism
- Missing Budget
- Charitable Foundations Run By Elites
- Purpose and Pursuit of Fulfillment
- In Whom Do We Trust?
- Obama's Base
- Hedge Fund Cons
- Whore Media
- Transcendent Moral Order
- Afghanistan
- The Little Girl Who Wanted to Replace God
- Little Girl Minority Cultures
- Religious Mind Rot
- False Liberty and Stimulation by Sirens
- Education of a Progressive
- Party Discipline
- Elites, Agenda 21, and NWO
- Greedy Science v. Social Wisdom and Meta Intuition
- Center Cannot Hold
- Libertarian Smears
- Gangster Government vs. Middle Class
- Gay Marriage
- Jews and Minority Cultures
- Restoring Checks and Balances
- Progress in Immateriality
- Pseudoscience
- Sissification of Military
- Open Borders
- Has Hubble made God small?
- Has America already been overthrown?
- The Race Card
- Responsible Empathy
- Multi Culti Rot
- Stoners
- Elites as cover for tyranny
- Consciousness as source of fuzz
- Fuzz
- Resetting Checks and Balances
- Double-Think
- Femimen
- Socialism is a one word contradiction
- Sacrifices of Progressives
-
▼
June
(42)
1 comment:
From A.T. -- Re: "What makes "anarchists" left-wing?"
Well, anarchists are stable in the same sense that nitroglycerin is stable. Anarchists feign to be proponents of small (as in zero) government. However, they know that neither absolute zero nor nitroglycerin will be sustained in a stable state within a society. When anarchists go ka-boom, they know it is prelude to the strong man. And that brings in totalitarian like big government. The more the collectivist governmental regulation, the further left you are. So anarchists may, in form, be rightists, but in immediate potential, they are explosive leftists. When anarchists claim to want to abolish social values, in reality they want to topple the economic structure and replace it with a far left collectivist system. In wanting to burn down and replace the system with elitist dictate, they may as well be social arsonists. IMO.
Likewise, fundamentalists who want detailed laws to intrusively legislate morality, insofar as they also want big government, are closer to the left than to the right. Conservatives tend to want respect for family values, but they prefer that such respect be assimilated in social mores. And they prefer that government revenues not be applied to discourage or transmogrify into hate speech the reasonable assimilaton of family values. Problem is, modern society flaunts disdain for essential family values to such an extent that preserving decency has become both urgent as well as nearly impossible -- either with laws or with mores. We are in a mess.
Post a Comment