Friday, December 19, 2008


(Click title above)


"To the Memory of Capt. Nathan Hale" by Eneas Munson, Sr. :

Hate of oppression’s arbitrary plan, The love of freedom, and the rights of man; A strong desire to save from slavery’s chain The future millions of the western main, And hand down safe, from men’s invention cleared, The sacred truths which all the just revered; For ends like these, I wish to draw my breath,’ He bravely cried, ‘or dare encounter death.’ And when a cruel wretch pronounced his doom, Replied, ‘Tis well, —for all is peace to come; The sacred cause for which I drew my sword Shall yet prevail, and peace shall be restored. I’ve served with zeal the land that gave me birth, Fulfilled my course, and done my work on earth; Have ever aimed to tread that shining road That leads a mortal to the blessed God. I die resigned, and quit life’s empty stage, For brighter worlds my every wish engage; And while my body slumbers in the dust, My soul shall join the assemblies of the just.

The great success of Western Civilization (freedom of thought and enterprise) has brought us to unsustainable levels of Political Correctness, Entitlement Theory, and Religion of Victim-Mongering. We are become a great herd of “mollypaths,” i.e., easy prey for psychopaths, who are gathering quickly to thin our herds.

If we wish to sustain Western Civilization, we must surpass our vision-less mollypathism.

We must define and enforce defensible borders --- in geography, language, and culture.

We must not allow ourselves to be overrun by unassimilable faux-immigrants. Cultural Creep: Beyond a tipping point, illegal immigration by massing Hispanics will sink American culture and common language and turn our meanings upside down, turning indolence into merit, unfairness into fairness, and p.c. mind control into education.

We must not allow ourselves to be overrun by unassimilable faux-religion. Sharia Creep: Beyond a tipping point, seditious preaching by massing religious fascists will sink American ethos and turn our morality upside down, turning dictate into justice, rote regurgitation into wisdom, and mind enslavement into charity.

We must not allow ourselves to be overrun by unassimilable faux-equality. Socialist Creep: Beyond a tipping point, socialistic indoctrination by powerfully connected and wealthy pirates and henchmen bent on farming the proletariat will sink our Bill of Rights and turn American laws upside down, turning disloyalty into loyalty, regulated graft into free markets, and enforced equality into liberty.

Presently, liberals, libertarians, and bluebloods promote the irreversible empowering of all three forms of Creep --- Cultural, Sharia, and Socialistic. Those who will take the most fascistic advantage of such Creepism are Race-Bigots, Religion-Intolerants, and Economy-Dictators. The only defenders against such Creepism tend to be Extreme Moderates and Social Conservatives. But, allied against them are both the mollypaths and the fascists they enable.

If Extreme Moderates and Social Conservatives wish to make common cause to sustain Western freedom of thought and enterprise, we must surpass mollypathism. Simply put, mollypaths are not on the side of sustainable freedom of thought and enterprise. The path America is presently on, i.e., “reaching across the aisle” to mollypaths, cannot suffice.

Comment at

"The refusal of Bush critics to acknowledge the historic and barbaric cruelty of President Bush's adversaries raises serious questions about their own moral commitments"

These people are mollycoddling dangerous psychopaths and sociopaths. There must be some genetic or cultural explanation for why we find ourselves so top heavy with mollycoddlers. Call them "MOLLYPATHS," because their efforts may as well be allied with the efforts of psychopaths and sociopaths.

When we get our next 9-11, we must not allow the country to go back to the mollycoddling mall. Rather, we must get in the faces of mollypaths and shame them as never before, as Neville Chamberlain was shamed.

Europe took an insane chance, disarming before Hitler. But Europe had America to re-arm it. America does not have a New-America to re-arm it. If we go down, we will have done it to ourselves. And the way we will have done it is by whimpering out to mollypaths. We need better insight into the mollypath mind, and soon!


HMHaanpaa ("I do not follow this topic because it has been out of control for so long. Avoiding situations is the only hope a person has so as not to become a statistic. We keep building more and bigger facilities for more and more law avoiders with no end in sight.")

We have more criminals for the same reason we have more terrorists: Liberals, Libertines, and Bluebloods mollycoddle and support them. They would rather a named killer or terrorist be paroled than that his unnamed future victims be protected. They would rather play an Inside Game than reform the Chicago Way. They would rather enable stupendous chasms in wealth and power than bring billionaire pirates to justice.

Support criminals, get rap crap, get more criminals. Support terrorists, get movies romanticizing Che, get more terrorists. Support unlimited power to purchase political influence, get Soros' "Open Society," reap the whirlwind.

When we are trying to defend society against sociopaths, this pattern of behavior becomes simply stupid. Libs, Libertines, and Bluebloods are "molly-paths." Its time to stop mollycoddling molly-paths. Get in their faces!


True Grit ---"What a maroon you are - we have suffered thru 8 years of a rogue administration who hAS lied us into war, caused countless deaths, betrayed the Constitution and Bill of Rights, not to mention betrayed a CIA officer, instituted torture as part of national policy...."

Have you served in the military? I don't get your "lied us into war." Please define lie (use your own definition) and then explain how Bush lied us into war.
Re --- "caused countless deaths": Have you considered how many deaths Bush has likely saved, in respect of our not having been attacked since 9-11?
Re --- "betrayed the Constitution": I may give this one to you, but only in the sense that Bush, and every other President for the past 40 years (especially Dems!) has failed to enforce our borders and to lead us to a sane energy policy. Unlike what I suspect of Dems, I am not aware of Bush's having sold out military secrets.
Re --- "betrayed a CIA officer": Surely you do not mean Valerie Plame, the desk jockey with the self-inflated husband who was "outed" by Armitage (Dem). Come on, man!
Re: "instituted torture": Are you quite sure no Dem ever authorized waterboarding? Are you quite sure Obama will not authorize it, should stakes become high enough? Are you quite sure your giving aid and comfort to our enemy is not inciting them to engage in real torture, Daniel Pearl style? Did you read what the goons of Mumbai did? Do you not see any connection in their real torture and your undermining of American efforts?
If "torture" concerns your "true grittiness" so much, what are you doing to bat it down where it is most heinous? And why are you helping to encourage our enemies to engage in it? Given your unsupported laundry list, I recommend you get treatment for BDS, asap. Good luck with that.


True Grit, Were you to constrict Franklin to his time and place, you may be right. But Federalists among the Founders supported the Alien and Sedition Act. Nor are Dems immune from modifying ideals to fit facts on the ground: FDR encamped many Japanese citizens.

Regardless, none of our leaders of yore lived in a time of WMD mixed with suicide-bombing, mind-dead creed-fascists. The plain fact is, psychopaths and their twisted true believers are unlikely candidates for rehabilitation, yet often have superior skills for positioning themselves to inflict maximum pain and destruction. Psychopaths' skills are exploding, while mollypaths sing pollyanna slogans from the past.

Mollypaths may as well be cheerleaders for psychopaths. (Give me a "b". Give me a "u".... What's that spell? Bush Is Evil. Gooooo .... Mollypaths!)

Frankin, perhaps the smartest man of his age, is not for us to shrink to tying himself to a never-changing position, notwithstanding great changes in facts on the ground.

Let's see what your Obama guy does. If he fails to protect the country, he is toast.

Better slogans for a new age (?): Freedom within law, liberty with order, autonomy subject to defensible borders! Don't be a mollypath --- you're just empowering psychopaths, )


There must be some sort of "brain freezing virus" or susceptibility to "mommy-overindulgence" to which Leftists minds are more exposed than most. Otherwise, what could possibly explain the hysterical handwringing by Leftists: about Israeli settlers vs. Palestinian bomb throwers; or about waterboarding of captured sources of high level enemy information, while at the same time losing no sleep whatsoever about abortions gone wild? What could explain Leftists' tremulous angst about the incarceration of captured enemy combatants vs. oblivious unconcern for safety of persons in whose neighborhoods such enemies would otherwise be released? What could explain Leftists' fascination with appearance, yet ignorance of reality?

Can we please just open up a big free room for vice and video games, to entice and divert all Pinnochio-Leftists so they can be led to devote themselves entirely to make-believe lands they know best?


Manning ("I favor the things Larrey Anderson identifies as religious rituals (higher fuel efficiency, pollution controls, etc.). I think limiting the freedom of some people to pollute is fair if it causes a cleaner environment for everyone. Moderation, of course, is important. Now, am I a religious fanatic?"):

Well, one man's religious fanaticism is another man's respect for God and Country.

I think Government should lead when it can lead responsibly. After all, who else can provide leadership when we otherwise would sink to "the tragedy of the commons"? Problem: Our Government has morphed to become less like a Responsible Adult than a Sociopathic or Narcissistic Child, launched from simple religious fealty, on to psychogenic addiction, on to towards full blown lunacy.

Ideally, Government could help us not just avoid calamities, but could also gently steer or inspire us to greater appreciation of common values, such as: clear skies, more varied environment, less monopolization of environment by human beings, more energy independence from sociopathic countries, more protection from special interest influence over legislators, and more protection for Constitutional integrity and national borders.

Responsible Government could gently steer us with better tax policies, such as in respect of: fuel taxes, sales taxes, and progressive taxes on political contributions.

The problem is, our Culture has allowed our Government to become so removed and so embedded with corruption that it cannot be trusted. Our Government, in many respects, is NOT RESPONSIBLE! Rather, Beltway Government is in bed with Big-Time Ponzi and Market-Cornering Opportunists. To turn over great gobs of money to such people is to invite electoral masochism on a grand scale.

What parent should trust a child who behaved as our Government, which has: Failed to respect or protect our borders, enriched our enemies, enabled Ponzi schemes for friends, and undermined common decency?

Our "child" (Government) needs tough love and intervention. We simply can no longer trust its fear mongering or feed its habits and fellow addicts. We need "The Dog Whisperer," to help show us how to put this Government on a much shorter leash.

Problem: The addicts are gone wild, off their leashes, and the adults will not regain control until the antics of the addicts brings them down and they can be re-fitted with appropriate standards of decency or shorter leashes (i.e., Atlas Shrugs).

Meantime, don't mollycoddle or unduly feed the monster! To do so is not especially supported by science, but only in faith, which, by now, is to approach religious lunacy.

We won't reclaim our "child" until we get him off his addictions.
Simply put: Do not believe the addict's schemes.


Equal Is As Equal Does --- :

Well, look to root causes, for crying out loud! Dems would not be so corrupt if Repubs were not so mean! Repubs make such a thing about working hard, looking good, and being a success. But, you know whut? Not everyone is born with energy, looks, or talent. So, why should Dems be penalized just because of accidents of birth? To compete, fairness requires that Dems not be held to the same standards. Dems should be entitled to lie, cheat, and steal, sort of as a class form of affirmative action, or reparations. Aren't Dems as good as Repubs? Shouldn't they have as much? How else they gonna get it? Criticizing Dems for being corrupt is like making fun of old people for being wrinkled. All people are equally entitled! You must be stupid! Haven't you ever read Marcuse?
Mollypaths, being the natural prey and useful idiots of psychopaths, tend natrually to ally with psychopaths against responsible society. Because mollypaths tend to have disproportionately less practical experience than booklearning, their “knowledge” tends not to be grounded in reality. Once brainwashed in respect of their unbalanced conditioning, few seem to escape the mollypathic worldview. David Horowitz is an exception.

Sunday, December 7, 2008

War Against Psychopaths

(Click title above)

Comments: War Against Psychopaths:

Comment by Dlanor, at

There is war going on, worldwide.

Everyone except Liberals and their sympathizers knows who are the aggressors. The aggressors are psychopathic “leaders” and their lust-blinded minions, scenting and ravening after power. Yet, Libs think psychopaths and their mesmerized minions are just upset on account of root causes, i.e., affronts and insults of conservatives.

Psychopaths, to kill free thought and demolish America (“burst the bubble”) in order to consolidate holds on power, worldwide, are using techniques of extra-national financial piracy (Soros), terrorism (Iran and Saudi Arabia), and direct military threats and actions (Putin). Such psychopaths need not indoctrinate a Fifth Column, because the work of indoctrination has already been done.

The Fifth Column, i.e., “Liberals” (useful dolts) and their media are busily killing free thought with “Ministry of Truth” fervor, i.e., college and corporate speech codes, selective definition and enforcement of “hate crime” legislation, and mob-militant acting-out, to enforce all manner of political correctness and emasculation of traditional family values, without which no assimilation of society can be conserved.

Demonstrably, smart psychopaths have great, asymmetric advantages for hacking to the top of any power structure, to preside over libs, idealogues, and other useful idiots. Reading through the history of the world, studying leaders of nations ruled by extremists, one soon apprehends how much of history consists in the study of psychopaths.

The miracle of America was consolidated when George Washington voluntarily declined a third term as President. Liberty lovers have conserved his example ever since. But the price of American liberty has been the dearest blood of each succeeding generation.

Except, perhaps, by studying history, one cannot very well appreciate liberty without having shed blood for it. Modern sheltered “Liberals” simply lack the maturity that comes of study or experience to apprehend when the root cause of evil is psychopathic will to power, rather than the slights or affronts of conservators.

Our newest and most sheltered generation, more so than most, now finds allayed against its liberty such insidious and monstrous forces as have rarely been encountered.

Modern Libs, in dangerous immaturity, project their childish philosophies onto psychopaths, conceiting thereby to understand them. Not even the patience of Job suffices to explain to modern Libs the error of their ways. Few children, especially over-sheltered children, sit still to be told they are behaving as children. But, correction comes soon, from sterner authority.

Saturday, December 6, 2008


(Click title above)

Re: The Augur’s Words --- see;

Absolute Moral Imperative by which to escape moral irresolution: Pursue empathy for the ongoing Source of the good!
Free Thought Experiment:

Conceptualize a Mathematical System of interacting, algorithmic laws, such that, in respect of such System --- EXCEPTING That Which Creates And Animates Such System ---such laws are: complete, consistent, continuous, consecutive, connected, competitive, cooperative, cohesive, coherent, and constant. That is, the laws interact in respect of controlling (finite) parameters, even though their number of possible permutations may be infinite (unbounded).

Now imagine “YOU” (a somehow conscious identity of indiscernibles), in appreciation of such system, could choose or be coaxed to “individualize yourself” by “jumping into” and making yourself mortally subject to such mix of laws. Regardless of “where,” “when,” or how often you jumped into the fray, you would perceive yourself as the central, mortal protagonist. All other protagonists you therein perceived as accompanying you would also perceive, and be perceived, as being subject to the same system of laws to which you thus became subject --- even though each may experience a unique perspective.

The being’ness of each would be interdependent upon, and empathetic of, laws motivating all. The very existence of each perspective of such system would be contingent upon that Potentate which potentialized, created, and animated that which avails the perspectives of all.

While accepting mortal subjectivity to such system (i.e., declining suicide), no subject thereto could comprehend the Potentate --- which authors and remains exceptional to such system.

On the other hand, howsoever the Potentate may comprehend each such mortal, such comprehension may consist, or be mathematically leveraged, in ways or means beyond the system availed to its mortalized participants.

Yet, conscious empathy may accompany all, in “mathematics directly intuited” --- beyond illusions of physicality. In humble, mutual awe of such Potentate, meaningful competition and cooperation may be inspired among all --- in symbols and signs of “physics” --- regardless of whether more specifically articulated in words reaching to transcend illusions of physics.

The superior, moral, and meta-meaning would be in empathy, suggesting our self-chosen illusion of freedom in individuality is valued enough to be worth its price.

Neither "space" nor "time" exist independently in themselves, and "space-time" is more a construct for calculational purposes than a physical thing that can actually be grided or sensed in any absolute sense.

Thus, any effort by a particular form or state of being to relate its sensations in respect of either space or time to space-time becomes inherently and ambiguously unstable, dependent upon frame of perspective and mind state of purpose.

Thus, regardless of where in space or when in time Consciousness may interpret or sense itself in relation to any frame of reference, space-time will not present to its range of senses, however augmented, as an unambiguous void.

No particular perspective of Consciousness that is self aware will ever be presented with any unambiguous sensation of approaching a pure void. Rather, all will experience and sense themselves as being surrounded by “physics.”
I conceive that the real “Ground of Being” is not constituted in fields of physics, but in fields of math.

Imagine a mathematical niche that has no independent reality in itself, but finds expression only in derivation from a “Mind-for-Math” (God).

Every perspective of consciousness of Mind-for-Math that happens to find expression in respect of such niche shares its niche with every other such perspective.

None of these perspectives exists “physically” apart from their mathematical niche, which functions as their shared universe, even though such universe has no independent reality in itself. Because physicality is not real in itself, neither are space, time, matter, or energy.

Rather, our separate perspectives are “real” only in derivative respect of a capacity of Mind-of-Math to compartmentalize consciousness of mathematical perspectives of matrixed sequences. (Of whether God keeps meta-time, meta-chronology, or meta-learning, what particular perspective can conceit to speak?) Among themselves, perspectives do not reconcile any independent, physical reality, but only a shared mathematical reality, which is availed by “grace” of Mind-for Math.

Every particular “perspective” (whether conscious, subconscious, unconscious, recording, sensate, reactive, or emerging) must experience the derivative (illusory) “physicality” of its experiences as being consistent with the mathematical rules it happens to share with other perspectives.

For each such perspective to obey and relate consistently to the mathematical parameters which happen to be shared among perspectives made to seem to occupy separate physical loci, the mathematical rules must avail differential marking (broken symmetry) among loci (space-time). Each perspective must relate consistently to the mathematical universe being shared, even as it experiences relative differentiation (in kinds and degrees) from its perspective. Each, in respect of its own relative locus of perspective, must reconcile parameters for the commonality (whole) with the differentiation (parts).

Such parameter-reconciliation (between wholes and parts, field-waves and particles) entails a differentially stretched experience or relational interpretation, by each perspective, of the sum of the “physics” of all others. This entails that each perspective will experience all others as aging at different, albeit reconcilable, rates. Thus, each perspective will experience its own chronological reconciliation.

At collapsed loci (points of shared intersection), interpretations of sequences of events will be shared. Among non-intersecting perspectives, sequences need not necessarily be interpreted as having occurred in the same order. After all, “physical events” do not independently exist in themselves, but only in virtue of their having collapsed to the measurement of some “perspective” (whether of consciousness or unconsciousness).

Perhaps, the “Twin Paradox” of Relativity is “resolvable” in respect that each twin’s derivative experience of collapsed physicality (aka, “mathematical field of reference”) never intersects in exact completeness with that of the other twin; rather, their experiences intersect only in partiality, which synchronously and continuously necessitates mathematical recalibration and reconciliation.

Neither twin has a “real age,” nor a “real physicality.” Rather, each is an experience of a different perspective of the consciousness of a Mind-for-Math. In respect of fundamental rules of math that are assigned or associated to each perspective, each twin will only interpret his/her apparent age, relatively.

Each twin will happen to share in an encompassing field of math, in respect of which each one’s experiences are synchronized. In respect of such common frame of mathematical reference, one twin will be interpreted, in relation to movements of the other, to have traversed more of that which translates into aging.

Thus, “I,” as a perspective of consciousness, lack reality independent of God. I have free will and moral worth, but only derivative of the grace and will of God. Even though we are derivative of the one Will-to-Math, or, perhaps because we are so derivative, I can empathize in moral respect of the pleasure, pain, motives, rationalizations, and awe of my fellow perspectives.

Holistically, during the tenure of a “universe of math,” the rules of math for the “physics” that are fundamental to such universe need not change. However, particular chronological perspectives of such rules do change, even “die.”

What would be our condition, were we ever to receive access, at will, to all the fundamental rules of our mathematical field of existence (as well as, perhaps, to all their implications)? Would our Ground of Being be dead? Or alive?


To the extent Consciousness is superior to physics, it cannot be completely explained in terms of physics. And, to the extent Consciousness has capacity to identify or split in respect of different compartments or perspectives of illusions of physics, it cannot be completely explained in terms of one particular perspective of physics.

A particular mortal perspective cannot communicate or represent its perspective of consciousness or of physics or of “the world” to any other perspective, except in trivial or incomplete and figurative terms of personal emotional content.

By establishing and acting in respect of each intersecting relationship of communication, each participant, sequencing in time and space, can get an intuitive or “empathetic flavor” for the other’s emotional experience.

But, there is no “real world” or “physical existence” or “particulate reality” or “experience of consciousness” that could be represented or signified between them because (1) to begin with, there is no “world” or “physical existence” that exists in itself, and (2) each perspective, to the extent it has been conceptualized to be different, is, by definition, different.

Excepting communication of tautologies, trivialities, and commonly governing mathematical relationships, we do not communicate External Content about “the world” to one another. Rather, by our verbal acts for attempting communication, we only act out our imprecise, emotional, empathetic, Internal Content (“feelings”) --- which does not diminish “communication” of intuitive, empathetic, non-trivial values that are possible between us.

While we cannot communicate “the world” between us, we can work together to discover measureable laws that limit the system of mathematical functions and parameters with which our perspectives in common participate and press their “wills.” That is, we can discover, “bookmark,” measure, and communicate the relationships that govern the system of mathematics with which each of our perspectives happens to have become identified.

Regardless, to discover such mathematical laws that may in common govern our illusory experiences of “physics” is not to discover or communicate any actual physical thing or “particle” that really exists in any common “world.”

Even the mathematical laws that we do share in common only “exist” derivative of a truism: That this is the mathematical system our separate perspectives of consciousness, for whatever reason beyond discernment in physics, “just happen” to have in common come to identify with and interact with.

Challenge to Logical Positivists --- coordinate consistent, non-trivial definitions for: morality; alive; conscious; physical; random; evolution; existent; nothingness.

Bottom line intuition: That which is most morally meaningful or inspiring cannot be expressed apart from metaphor or free of logical ambiguity. This is because Our Ground of Being may be mathematical, for which the Source exists not in independent physics, but in an ambiguous, metaphysical “Mind of God.” This often frustrates those who wish to learn how to be God, but less so those who stand in awe of God. Among them, for scientists, moralists, and poets, there need be little frustration.


Quotes by Max Planck:

Religion belongs to that realm that is inviolable before the law of causation and therefore is closed to science.

The history of all times and nations teaches us that exactly in the naïve, unshakable belief, furnished by religion in active life of believers, originate the most intense motives for the most significant creative performance, not only in the field of arts and sciences but also in politics.

Under these conditions it is no wonder, that the movement of atheists (Gottlosenbewegung), which declares religion to be just a deliberate illusion, invented by power-seeking priests, and which has for the pious belief in a higher power nothing but words of mockery, eagerly makes use of progressive scientific knowledge and in a presumed unity with it, expands in an ever-faster pace its disintegrating action on all nations of the earth and on all social levels. I do not need to explain in any more detail that after its victory not only all the most precious treasures of our culture would vanish, but -- which is even worse -- also any prospects at a better future.

All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force... We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix of all matter.


As John Scotus Erigena put it to Frankish king Charles the Bald in the year 840 A.D., "We do not know what God is. God himself doesn't know what He is because He is not anything. Literally God is not, because He transcends being."


MIND OF GOD: Leibniz had arrived at a radically different understanding of the universe and the things found in it. According to his Monadology, all things that humans ordinarily understand as interactions between individuals and all things that humans ordinarily understand as relations among individuals (such as their relative positions in space and time) have their being in the mind of God but not in the Universe where we perceive them to be.


Matter, energy, space and time are made manifest, interdependent, interrelation-al, perceived by awareness’s, and harmonized within limits made manifest in rules of inertia. We seem unable to know, in a direct perceptual sense, whether such harmonization of manifestations exists independently, or whether it is “caused” by some kind of un-seeable, metaphysical mush, beyond our abilities to scientifically measure or predict. But, we can, and do, sense identity, animation, drive, spirit. We cannot exist without experiencing purpose. In so sensing, we “know” we have moral goals; that there is more to existence than directly meets our abilities to see, hear, feel, smell, or taste. So sensing, it seems not a great leap to intuit, envision, or receive revelations regarding, a more perfect, guiding, harmonizing, comforting spirit. That spiritual “oneness” is what Jesus melded into.


Perhaps the “real distance” between my compartmentalized perspective of Will and yours may be nothing more than such imagery as is required in order for each of us to resonate in respect of an “anthropic illusion” of separateness of experience of the other.

Each preserves his experience of separateness of identity or perspective only so long as every aspect of his “physicality” coordinates in resonating respect of such illusion.


"The first real AI would be something that we don't even understand," says Wright, "because we didn't program it. It will be more dissimilar in the way it thinks, than we are to a mouse."


See also:;;;;;;;;;;;;;;