Sunday, November 5, 2017

Rino v. Dino Collectivism



Problem is, States are becoming creatures of Corporations, as Corporations invest more in buying and selling politicians and political influence, instead of in commodities and production.  However, this is not the fault of corporations.  This is the fault of a liberty-illiterate society that has allowed corporations to swamp it with liberty-illiterate people.
A Representative Republic that fails adequately to check and balance against the natural tendency of corporations to seek easy profits must soon fall prey to profit seeking by the corporate buying and selling of political influence.  The problem is not who to blame.  The problem is how to regain competent citizenship.

************

The agents that are causing societies to circle the drain are unmitigated greed and hedonism, made out to be the new morality.  Those are the common directors behind how human decency, dignity, and liberty are being polluted.
This is in accompaniment with an idea that spiritual faith must be entirely replaced with faith in elitist driven scientism.  Under scientism, that which can be measured to produce the most pleasure for the most people is considered to be that which is most moral.  (Even though such a construction is logically problematic.)   This faith in scientism begins by measuring dopamine effects in the brain.  Soon, the most moral use of a bot will be based on how orgasmically effective it is.  In this train, it becomes "moral" to require children to be taught "safe" anal sex, to experiment with homosexuality, to celebrate having two daddies, etc., with no brakes in sight.  Reliance on the family is replaced with reliance on trend setting "moral" elitists --- who stand to make bucks.
This makes it easy and tempting to herd people.  People are already tuned out from each other and instead tuned in to their personal devices and video games.  They don't know how to interact decently.  So we get an onrush of sexual harassment complaints.  In Muslim countries, we get men marrying pre-teens.  A lot of people, unless told, simply never grow up to learn how or what to do with themselves.  They are made ripe for the picking.
Any spiritual caution to avoid plucking perpetual children for abusive and farming purposes is now thrown to the winds and watering holes of scientism.  There does not need to be any cabal of evil people to make such trends.  They simply drink from the same watering holes, where they are now unconstrained and unmitigated by any kind of cautioning or effective decency.  IOW, people have given up on any search for decent higher mindedness in theosophy or philosophy, and have instead surrendered to the gratifying delusions of "moral scientism."  Under this "scientific moral philosophy," no one has moral standing to caution or protect an adult from hiring him/her-self out for abuse if that is what he/she wants to do --- unless licensed by the elitist run governing authority (under "principles" of scientism).

***************

In practice, Communism, Socialism, and Fascism have more in common.  They are all collectivist.  Behind them all, there tends to be a ruling class of amoral, conniving, floating elites.  Orwell provides a good description of Oligarchic Collectivism in his dystopian novel, 1984. 

Oligarchs often specialize in hedge tactics of divide and rule.  They are fully capable of hiring surrogates to curry favor on all sides, before they betray all.  Socialists can serve oligarchs who have bought political influence, just as Fascists can.  What the people take to be government for the collective tends to be government for elites who with laundered money or dark force have bought or conquered the government, as a commodity or booty.

To try to distinguish among these different fronts for collectivists is often to make distinctions that make little difference.  The practical effect of all is rule over the masses by corrupt knowitall elites, who often, ironically, end up being fed to their own self-created monstrosities.

To gain a decent government for non-sub-humans, a representative republic is needed, with a moral and informed citizenry, sharing an ideal of individual freedom and responsibility, and a work ethic over an entitlement ethic.  IOW, a society assimilated to "act white." 

The alternative tends to be subhumanizing collectivization, which by subterfuge gradually inveigles its way to degrade all citizens and to infest every institution.  When a citizenry, by unwise practices of immigration and education, loses  moral vision and wisdom, it soon falls to degrading pleasures and amoral parasites.  And so the constant cackling of the Establishment of well-heeled parasites has become unbearably noisome.

***************

For whatever reason, it does seem that a lot of Jews place tribal collectivism over the representative republic.  The Founders did not share the collectivist ideal, but, somehow, that ideal has now penetrated every institution.  Modern moguls seem to invest less in domestic industrialization and more in buying and selling gov favors.  The consequence is elites ruling over masses, with money talking and bs walking.  The consequence is much the same as if a mess of Bolsheviks had become the ruling nomenklatura. 
There is Bolshevik collectivism and there is Oligarchic collectivism, but both are collectivism.  The consequence of both is to destroy the representative republic.  The cynical, corrupt, godless thing is this:  Collectivizing oligarchs pretend they are on the side of equality and fairness for the masses, their shills and professoriate sell that, and the useful idiots and studenti actually and stupidly come to believe it! 
Bottom line:  Too many alien ideals were allowed to infest the republic, so that it cannot now likely be salvaged without considerable trauma.  I don't care a whit about race, gender, religion, orientation --- until idiots, race baiters, femi-nazis, and femimen start destroying the republic and all the institutions needed to sustain it (faith, family, fidelity, i.e., good faith and good will). 
The choice between oligarchic collectivism and communal collectivism is a choice without any important distinction.  We need to learn how to provide a safety net without killing the work ethic, and we need to check moguls from buying and trading governments as if they were commodities.  But our main political parties have lied and presented us with a fake either-or choice:  Either promote oligarchic collectivism or promote communal collectivism.  Either way, the masses are to be promised utopia but served eventual enserfment and gulag.

**********

Until a race based culture overwhelms the USA, there is still a chance, even if slim, that a culture can be resuscitated that would include all races and still reflect some American values regarding human freedom and dignity.  This would have to entail Blacks, Minorities, and Jews ceasing to be inspired to avoid "acting White,"i.e.., acting independently and responsibly, rather than as collective tribes.  That would necessitate a miracle.  A well spoken charismatic uniter for restoring faith in the American ideal (of individual freedom and dignity), rather than a divider.

Problem is, so long as elite collectivizers, oligarchs, and race-baiters ride high, that chance grows slimmer every day.  Like parasites, many seem unyielding in their desire to suck the blood of the republic dry.  Unfortunately for everyone, the replacement society they dream of would be a nightmare.

************
There is no fairy godmother.  God is not like that.  We are given participatory will under a system that avails tough love --- not love of everything, and not heaven on earth.  Of our participatory will, there is reconciliation and judgment.  God is not "love everything and make everything perfect on earth."  What we can pray for is strength and guidance, not perpetually primrose lanes.  Adults can learn to accept that, or they can fall into the trap of trying to replace God with Big Gov (above which Evil will always be floating).

A side effect to putting corrupt and divisive anti-Americans in charge of immigration, education, and media. If Dino/Rinos have their way, the safe spaces they promise will turn into no safe spaces for anyone anywhere. The path to plantation perdition is paved with the good intentions of incompetent knowitalls. And their Fed Judges.

I have no need of watching a lot of perpetually whiny ingrates, many of whom are criminals or abusers, playing with a ball while they deem themselves qualified to preach to the nation about absolute bs.

We are awash in educated fools. For political concerns, high IQ means little. I know a lot of high IQ people. About half of them are supremely educated fools about social and political matters. IOW, their Political IQ sucks. Unless you admire stooges for NWO Rinos and Hairy Godmother Dinos. Give me a widely read thinker of experience and aptitude, who loves America, anytime over some femi-dandy who thinks his high test scores mean he is most likely right on political concerns. No doubt, a lot of the godforsaken Bolsheviks had high IQ's. A lot of similar pinky-waggers need to be tarred and feathered if the republic is to have a chance.

*************

It is automatic that Dems will try to blame someone outside their criminal party, because they hope their lies will condition minds before the truth has a chance to get its boots on.

Decent adults will want the facts.  They will want to see what motivated the Perp.  Was it republican love for American Ideals of freedom and dignity?  Was it entitlement-minded hatred of the republic, combined with juvenile wish for a collectivist gov to serve forever as nursemaid?  Was it crazed fake-religion indoctrination?  Was it the work of a lunatic or a madman with a grudge against the people of the Church or society generally?  Could gun confiscation have prevented the crime, or would it to a certainly neuter the citizenry under elitist diktat?

If the Perp was an Islamic lunatic, Dems and their lapdog Media will obfuscate as long as they can, while they try to sell their plan for neutering the citizenry.


**************

Trump means to make the economy better for Americans. He is not empowered as a dictator. He has to work with Congress, which is beholden to oligarchic corporatists. This Congress is not even inclined to let him enforce the border, much less resist the drowning of the republic into the NWO. Trump also has to work with the changed demography. It is not a demography of reliable, responsible, independent minded, well read, decent citizens. It is a demography with the mindset of being easily snookered to believe itself entitled to have "The Gov" baby the kiddies so they never have to learn how to think or to be responsible for themselves. Just follow the fairy godmother promises of wolf elites in sheep's clothing.
Under an out-of-control idea of PC and diversity, this demography has been rendered largely unable to assimilate a decent system of principled values. Rather, it inclines to clamor for ever more free stuff and safe spaces. As if an idea of gov were a magical replacement for an idea of a magical god.  Given such a corrupt Congress and ignorant babyish electorate, it is idle to expect Bernie could be a savior or that the masses will ever stop clamoring for free stuff short of bankrupting the republic and filling it with desperate and impoverished cheap and radicalized "laborers."
Formally, there may be a way to walk and chew gum at the same time. That is, to provide a safety net without undermining the work ethic, while inhibiting corporatists from turning the gov into a new kind of commodity to buy and sell. That way would be to eliminate and replace domestic income taxes with a progressive tax on individual consumption, with lobbying for gov favors to be taxed as consumption to whatever agent authorized it.
However, no one thinks about how to preserve both the work ethic and the representative republic! Rather, people think in either-or terms:  Either gov monopolization of all power, or elite corporatists monopolization (actually, oligop-olization) of all power. Dino communal collectivists v. Rino oligarchic collectivists. But they are both collectivists, and both are death to the representative republic. (You need to make up your mind about whether the Koch brothers are for or against defending the border.)
Regardless, absent a miraculous spiritual reawakening, no mere trick of forms can save us from the trend. Maybe spiritual good faith and good will, over time, can help. Trump is more equipped to buy us time than anyone else. This is because the NWO Establishment cannot control him, but it certainly can control Bernie. Trump cannot save us overnight. He can buy us time.
No one can read another person's intentions, but all responsible citizens must try. My read of Trump is that he, more than most, actually wants to forestall the destruction of the republic. And for that, the Establishment hates him.  Because they think most Americans, "for their own good," need to be farmed. If the Elitist Establishment succeeds much longer in turning the citizenry, professoriate, and media into unable-to-think stooges, they will, by a long run of corruption, have made themselves right. Not every country or culture is suited for representative republicanism. In a short time, that may also come to apply to the USA. At that collective point, the argument between nomenklatura (or Soros-klatura, to be fronted by Bernie or Warren) and oligarchs (fronted by Bushes) will mean little to the masses.  Either way, they will be driven to serfdom or gulag.  Farmed.  Sub-humanized under thoroughly godless and corrupt elites.  Laughing as they play both sides against the middle, as they destroy the American Ideal by branding individual freedom and responsibility as "too white."

****************

I do have little patience with any complaint against Trump that compares him with those who want to destroy the republic merely because he is wealthy.
Trump recognizes and deals with reality.  Reality is that corporatists own Congress.  If Trump were doing nothing about that, he would not be so opposed by so many of the corporatists would own Congress.  For that, the Bushes and McCain are slime in my estimation.
Trump did rail against the NWO.  But its handmaidens have smeared him relentlessly.  They have most of the institutionalized power (claws).  “At the parliament of animals, the rabbits demanded equal rights, and the lions replied, ‘But where are your claws?’” 
Bannon is our claws.  Although Bannon appears to be on the outs, I suspect he is not.  I think Bannon will help rid the Senate of some Rinos.  Until then, the Establishment's hold on Congress is such that there is little Trump can do, outside Executive Orders.  Which the Establishment challenges at every turn. 
It is hard to imagine why you think Bernie could or would do more.  Bernie is a socialist.  He promises free stuff.  There are no principled limits to that routine.  It is poison.  Its na├»ve supporters would vote the nation into bankruptcy, poverty, and destruction.
I suspect you are mainly concerned with Health Care.  I doubt Bernie could break the Insurance industry on that.  Trump would like a dual/single payer system like that of Australia.  But Congress, in its current state, would never go for that.  So Trump has to deal with the real world.
The establishment oligarchy wants:  To keep borders porous; to import enough diversity and division to keep the general weal toothless; to control votes with cheap bribes and broken promises; to raise the economic ladders away from the middle class; to poison higher minded faith and replace it with gov crony-it is; to replace the nuclear family with governmental oversight; to make marriage meaningless; to utterly control the indoctrination of youth; to unmask and get the dossier goods on everyone's closeted skeletons; to encourage people to revile the American ideal of individual freedom and responsibility; to control the definitions of equal and fair and politically correct; to control the mass-mind to deem "racist" whatever the oligarchy finds profitable to put down; to generally neuter the citizenry; to brand anti-oligarchism as populist; to brand national loyalty as bigoted; to foster divisiveness by allowing the work ethic to be branded as acting too white; to weaken the U.S. so that it cannot push or defend its founding values; to flatten and widen the gulf between the striving class and the ruling class; to distract the masses with general fear and cheap pleasures; to keep the masses and new immigrants clamoring for ever more fake free stuff; to gimmick a sudden replacement of currency and wealth; to make a babble of political philosophy.
When I look at Bernie's constituency, I see a lot of wrongly educated, poorly judging, inexperienced, incompetent, undisciplined, irresponsible, entitlement-minded goofs.  Idiots like those of Antifa.  Fodder for established connivers.  Brain damaged by thoroughly rotted and conniving institutions in academia, media, religion, banking, courts, legislatures, foundations, and entertainment.  I have little faith that they could move the Establishment towards any kind of  revitalization of the representative republic.  Rather, as Hillary would cackle, they would be easily farmed.

***********

The parasitical establishment of pinky-wagging cannibals and stooges is going to jeer at Trump no matter what. They make up the Rino/Dino part of the electorate. The thing is, the American part of the electorate is on to their game. And neither the Establishment of Rinos nor Dinos can defeat Trump without support from common-sense Americans. Constant jeering from the near treasonous Aino (NWO/Open Border) quarter will keep Trump's approval low. However, at the end of the day, the electorate will not replace Trump with another Bush, Clinton, or Obama. Still, the political roaring sponsored and agitated by the media-owning oligarchy will be deafening, and will try to turn many families inside out.

******************

I don't read much of what David Brooks says.  When I have read him, he has seemed to be much concerned with preserving respect for the busybody elitists who seek to replace the Republic and the Constitution.  Does he think ordinary Americans tend to be too sub-standard and incompetent to see to their own affairs?  An elitist tends to believe he and his kind should be ruling the masses, even without their consent.  Or that snookering their consent is ok.

Both Rinos and Dinos believe in snookering and ruling the masses.  Rinos would do it by putting corporatists out front to buy the Gov and then let the Gov pretend to be democratic.  Dinos would do it by letting its corporatists lead from behind the curtain.  In practice, both are oligarchic collectivists.  In name, Rinos are "open-border free-traders," while Dinos are "social justice warriors" seeking to impose their idea of equality (free stuff) and fairness (safe spaces) on everyone else.  Both seek to replace the Constitution with however International Law may evolve for the NWO.

I suspect David Brooks is an empty barrel for promoting the Rino brand of oligarchic collectivism, while Bernie is an empty barrel for promoting the Dino brand of oligarchic collectivism.  Even though Brooks calls himself a "Republican," and even though Bernie calls himself a "Socialist."  Are my suspicions wrong?

*************

Would Dems be too principled to make stuff up, like a rat? I think we know the answer. We've seen this movie before. Dems think their good intentions give them a pass to lie. As elites, they need to deceive the masses, for their own good. So, Dems have little credibility. Then they blame Americans who don't trust them, for being "uneducated."

**************

New World Order: Open Borders. Rule by Elites. Kabuki with the Masses.
As to the God part, you might be choking on a gnat. I simply mean respect for Whatever-the-Source under which the Nature of our Cosmos finds its unfolding definition. Before you can enjoy honest communication about that which is reasonable, you need to find association with people "churched" in honest good faith and good will.

Freedom, like goodness, is a concept that merits more thought. It should not be taken as entitlementism or right to rule over or take from others. Within a society, freedom should not be promoted as relief from personal and social responsibility. There is reasonable freedom within parameters. Freedom under Law. There is no such thing as complete Free Will. There is Participatory Will. We are not free of our bodies, language, culture, society, or country. Nor of God.
Rather, we part-icipate, within allowable parameters, within more holistic systems of dynamic feedback. What is an appropriate range for freedom in one society may well be inappropriate in another.
This is the problem with the idealization of an open-bordered NWO (which does seem to have floated to become a problem for many profs and undergraduates). It could only be accomplished by flattening out the management of the masses, by forcibly reducing many of the ranges for their freedom of thought, expression, enterprise, and association. It would tend to sub-humanize the masses and to monster-ize the rulers.

After Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama, DC became a Perfect Swamp Storm. No shrinking violet could hope to push it back on itself, no matter how smart. To lead the push back, it was necessary to find someone who had been brash enough to thrive among cannibals, cutthroats, connivers, and sordid criminals. Someone who could see their games, see through their charades, and dish back as good as he got. If God wants to preserve the representative republic against the corrupt corporatists that control the Rinos and Dinos, it would seem to make sense to offer DJT. Donald The Strong. F the Swamp.

To preserve their world order, the Romans tried to make too many citizens out of foreign mercenaries. That Did Not Work.

Not all Americans want a Military that may incline more to serve NWO interests than American interests. Not all Americans want a Military in which Generals are transgendered or same-sex married. Not all Americans want to work in close quarters with same-sex Gays. Not all American men want to go into combat with female soldiers. Perhaps fewer Americans find the Neo-Military to be well led. I wonder if that may be affecting recruitment goals and driving down standards? What's next? Offering citizenship to mercenaries?

The problem with making government out to be science is that it provides fake legitimacy for the rule by elites over the unwashed masses, even though the elites are paid to find what favors their funders to be "scientific." And it encourages morons to think themselves entitled and qualified to replace the republic. So we get people like Colin K as man of the year. Insanity!

In the hands of corrupt people farmers, greedy scientism pretends to have answers to moral issues beyond science. This helps them establish Turkey Schools to indoctrinate ("educate") gobblers.

Whatever continues to define the unfolding Nature of our cosmos is by definition above (beyond, Super) to such Nature. It cannot be understood by science that is limited to our nature. It can be qualitatively appreciated, as a Source in respect of which to communicate and seek to inspire good faith and good will.

There is danger in the U.S. Military becoming the enforcement arm of the NWO Oligarchy. Especially with the NWO flooding the borders and destroying the republic.

Snowflakes, Transvestites, and Trannies are the Neo-Red-Guard under Madam Soros.

******************

I don't remember any high rates for mass shootings between 1955 and the time of mass release from mental asylums on account of Ken Kesey's novel of 1962 and the time of the cultural divisiveness of the 1960's. It may be interesting to chart the per-capita rates for mass shootings for each year against the increase in elitist-sponsored divisiveness for each year. It may also be interesting to chart any increase from 1986 (after immigration reform and as we later began electing a string of Rino-Dinos --- from Bush to Clinton to Bush to Obama).

A study of changing rates of mass shootings from 1955 to present is needed, if we want to say that the changing emphasis on porous borders, immigration, diversity, family structure, tolerance of Islam, "social-justice" agitation funded by people-farming oligarchs, and use of the U.S. Military to police the World have not played a significant role (more so than the mere existence of guns) in mental sicknesses and tensions leading to mass shootings and killings.

Of course, if we want to give gov despots and their stooges a monopoly on mass force and mass killing, then neutering the general citizenry is the way to go. If our highest value is peace in the countryside, we could also adopt the despotism of Vlad the Impaler. His kingdom was quite peaceful. Until then, the USA will probably be Ground Zero for the worldwide war funded by people-farmers against separately-bordered nations and non-elitist-ruled representative-societies. Agitation leading to violence will go hand-in-hand with that. The message from hirelings for oligarchic people-farmers seems to be: If you want the violence we cause to be stopped, then accept our cherry-picked evidence and hand over your defenses.

**************


How much money has been laundered by unprincipled Rinos and Dinos because they found it convenient to tell us that Islam is a religion of peace? Whatever this is, noblesse oblige it is not.


***************

Standing against the storm of unreason: ""For you have been taught that we must have as much diversity as possible and that equality means that everyone must be made equal. But equal simply means the same. To say that 2+2 equals 4 is to say that 2+2 is numerically the same as four. And diversity simply means difference. So when you say that we should have diversity and equality you are saying we should have difference and sameness. That is incoherent, by itself."

****************

Did someone force some harsh holy water on you? I did not say you cannot discuss freedom without use of the word "God." Regardless, you are going to need to reference an idea higher than sheeple-farming by expert scientisimists --- even if only by implication. Even if you want to assume moral truths just fell upon us out of otherwise nothingness. The invisible elephant in the room.
I simply think an attitude of personal respect for a Source of Higher Mindedness can serve as an attractant to bring people to reason together in responsible good faith and good will. Not necessarily as stooges for fake prophets, priests, Imams, commies, or oligarchs. Otoh, those who seek to replace personal receptivity to an idealization for Higher Mind-edness with one of Big Gov tend to be far more likely to promote Big Evil, imo, based on my read of history.
By assimilating higher minded ideals of goodness and civility, there is less need of intrusive, busybody Law. Not everyone believes in social scientism or Marxism. Well, except maybe those who want to be sub-humanized or to rule over sub-humans.
This is not really that hard. Are you sure you are capable of intelligently discussing anything?



Thursday, October 26, 2017

Liberalism is past its "sell by" date



Once the electorate is flooded with sheeple who neither understand freedom nor want it, the curtain may well come down on the American Experiment. Allowing such flooding is national suicide.

Lincoln: "Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant to step the ocean and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia, and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest, with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not by force take a drink from the Ohio or make a track on the Blue Ridge in a trial of a thousand years. At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer. If it ever reach us it must spring up amongst us; it cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen we must live through all time or die by suicide."

*****************

To advocate for Bernie or Hillary is to advocate for oligarchic collectivism, even if posing under different names. They favor open borders, the better to collectivize and farm the people. The only alternative to the fronts offered for oligarchic collectivists was Trump. The others were for the PC / open border / fake fair trade crapola.

Trump believes in restoring the representative republic. McCain believes in protecting the NWO, i.e., elitist rule over the masses. Of course McCain is against most everything Trump stands for! Tools in the service of Fascists, like McCain, believe the masses need to be ruled by elites, scientifically, for their own good. No doubt, Hitler, Stalin, and nearly every fascist has believed he/she was a force for "good." It's not that elitists and fascists think they are the State. It's that they think they are stand-ins for God. And they are hell bent to convince us that is a "good" thing.

*************

The world oligarchy seems to have settled on using the U.S. to take the lead as world policeman. This means the U.S. will never be able to be at peace. It also means Americans will be world targets. Primarily, it will be ordinary American citizens who will be at risk as world military police, and American citizens who will be at risk for blowback as targets of criminal regimes of terrorism. Not the oligarchs who have decided American troops and citizens must be assigned such roles.
As more and more regimes of despots acquire WMD, more and more American citizens will be exposed to blowback and terrorism. Even though oligarchs arranged this situation, ordinary Americans did not volunteer to make their nation perpetually at war or its citizens perpetual targets.
Bottom line: World oligarchs want to cannibalize America and use its citizens as fodder and targets. Only Trump seems to want to MAGA and to defend Americans from needless mayhem.

***************

Russian collusion means Russia playing all sides against the middle. Russia was going to conspire and collude to divide and weaken the U.S., no matter what. You know (assuming you have two brain cells to rub together), Bernie is a communal loving fake socialist, and Hillary is a purveyor of nuclear fuel to Russia. What, you want the U.S. to go the way of Venezuela?
And wth do you mean by American Ideals? You should mean the ideals of individual freedom and dignity. But I suspect you mean the fake ideals of free stuff ("equality and fairness") and safe spaces ("open borders and supervised speech"). What kind of crap are you peddling? American Patriot my azzz.

***************

Liberalism of 1776 cannot apply to 2017.  In 1776, the voting base tended to be restricted to men, who owned property, who spoke English, who read, who had ties to the community, who politically were Americans --- not globalists.  They relied on tariffs.  They had little concern about unequal enrichment of oligarchs, because un-patriotic oligarchs would be subject to being tarred and feathered.
In 2017, so-called "Progressivism" implicates open borders and voting by alien residents.  A patriot is slammed as being a nationalist or populist.  Foreign oligarchs, Chinese Princelings,  and Saudis easily launder money to pay kickbacks to buy political influence.  Most members of Congress become millionaires, probably illegitimately.  They become lickspittles for corrupt oligarchs, while giving ordinary Americans only lip service, if that.  They bribe for cheap votes with fiat money and fake budgets.  They talk about fair trade when they really mean laundered kickbacks.
The point is, an idea of classical liberalism under the corrupt circumstances of today makes little sense.  What we need is neither more classical economic liberalism nor neo-liberalism.  What we need is more Conservers of Liberty.  We need to ask:  What is needed in today's circumstances to sustain a decent representative republic that avails human freedom and dignity. 
The answer is NOT more unbalanced personal enrichment of people-farming oligarchs so they can buy even more political influence.  Neither is the answer the destruction of individual initiative or work ethic.  The answer is NOT corporate tax rates trending higher than any industrialized nation. 
The answer is probably comprehensive:  Progressively tax personal consumption, and classify political lobbying as taxable personal consumption, to be personally charged to the agent(s) who authorized it.  But no mere gimmick can fix the soul of what ails the representative republic.  Central governmental power in domestic matters needs to be severely chopped back.  Race baiting divisiveness by misled and fake SJW's and their stooge judges needs to be discredited.  The grip of PC on public discourse needs to be killed.  Spiritual values need to be restored to respectability in the public square.  Agents for Churches and Charities that use contributions to lobby for changes in the law need to be taxed.  Money invested in domestic businesses needs not to be taxed.  Money sent or wired outside of country needs to be taxed, as if it were a form of personal consumption.  Durable products imported need to be taxed proportionate to tariffs charged by the sending nation.  Durable products exported need not to be taxed.
The consequence would be to MAGA.  In a world where so many nations and cultures are so primitive, dysfunctional, and "religiously" insane, it is insane to sink America into its mire.  It is insane to drown America and Americans under an open bordered NWO to be ruled by the most evil of oligarchs that can float to the top.  Stooges that shill for oligarchic floaters are criminally and economically insane.

******

Because of the Oligarchy's use of media/academia to indoctrinate a lot of wussie women and incompetent femimen (who else majors in Social Justice Warrior-ing?) into believing they had been educated into superior "political truth" (socialism), Hillary was almost elected and the representative republic was almost destroyed and replaced by the Oligarchy.

Now, the colluding Oligarchy is insane with madness about Trump having found a way to defeat its Kabuki Diktat.  Trump's appeal to competent individualists was not illegal, but the self-godded Oligarchy took it as an insult.  Who dares to insult the god-oligarchy (that exercised power to secrete the JFK files in excess of 50 years)?  Because of the insult, the Fake God Oligarchy abused the system to appoint a corrupt Special Inquisitor to dig enough dirt against former associates of Trump to try to force them to help bootstrap charges.

Meanwhile, the front for the Oligarchy (Hillary), funded by the launderer for the Oligarchy (Soros), twisted by its joker (Obama), remains guilty as sin and free as a bird.  The AG for Trump (Sessions) has been neutered.  So Hillary may well go un-prosecuted, notwithstanding that she remains in open defiance of Congress, had thousands of emails "wiped" with a hammer, and received millions in laundered money for greasing the sale of uranium to Russia.

The lesson the Oligarchy would give:  The way to remain free of prison is not by obeying the law, but by pleasing the Oligarchy.  In a corrupted society, to quote the cyclops of Oh Brother Where Art Thou, it's all about the money.  (And greasing the right friends.)

*************

It appears Comey was suckered by Russian dis-information into reopening the Tarmac Investigation, which moved enough votes to elect Trump. The gods got a good laugh. Now, let's hope they want more. By suckering Mueller into even more investigation of Russian Collusion.

To re-paraphrase Jim Croce: Don't tug on Superman's cape, don't spit in the wind, don't pull the mask of the ole Lone Ranger ... and don't mess around with tar baby Trump.

***********

Unearned manna given to entitlement-minded trained-parasites produces ingrates.  Unearned manna is not charity.  It is poison.  It produces nose-ringed, fake-religious maniacs for a phony chosen oligarchy to pull around and deploy to sack every republic.  It makes it open season to war against human freedom, dignity, and decency.
Moral and spiritual anarchy are winning.  We are suffering from World Stupidity Poisoning.  Fake Do-Gooderism is killing good sense and common decency.  We are allowing souldead Oligarchs to tax nations to grease trained Stupids to create a New World Dystopia.  It's ignorant evil face is adopted by Fake Libs and is shown in your photo.

The next step will be to use AI to detect independent mindedness and thought crime.  An evil borgdom is waiting to be born.
Yeats --
The darkness drops again; but now I know  
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,  
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,  
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?

*************

Whether or not Alinsky wrote this, it has in practice been made the blueprint for Ainos as they replace the representative republic with an open bordered NWO under the elitist diktat of oligarchic collectivists. Orwell's 1984 wrote about oligarchic collectivism. It was supposed to be a warning, not a how-to manual. But everyone who points this out is shouted down as a so-called racist, phobic, or misogynist. We have met Evil, and it is on rampage amongst us.

Next, the dysfunctional Left will be telling us it is immoral for the non-disabled to breed. Especially when without consent under the diktat of the ruling regime of collectivizing oligarchs. No forny unless under consent of kakistocracy. (NFUCK).

***********

Lefties think surrendering to become sheeple will incite the better angels of ruling oligarchs. But nothing in history supports that. The promising oligarchs always turn out to be cackling Clinton-ians.

There is no guarantee to how it plays out. In the end, the Sun expands and consumes us. Meantime, we can express ourselves as human beings or as subhumans. If you want the subhuman camp, go.
Some among us have faith that the Godhead seeks to guide a flowering of humanity. We sense that in the miracles of life, of the creation of the USA, of the astonishing capacities of Substance and Math. Others think the end-all be-all is in pleasure within a Borgdom. For them, little matters --- creation or annihilation --- apart from dope and dopamine. Free grass and safe pastures. Moo.

Don't resist the wolves because that will just make them tear you apart faster. Wth kind of "thinking" is this? If this is a "principle," then apply it to God: Don't resist Evil, because that just makes it stronger. Wth?
There are people who are soulddead, who do not believe in any higher mindedness apart from what pleasures them. They take this as an article of scientific faith. You will not likely convince them of any alternative by playing nice with them.
To think as the author advocates is to kill human decency and replace it with sub-humanization. It is to try to deny victory to the opposition by preemptively surrendering to it. To deny subhumanization by preemptively making yourself subhuman. What kind of femiman writes this way?

***************

Yet, Trump's approval remains low.  Because the oligarchs who set pc-approved speech want it that way.  Given the befouling of immigration and indoctrination under modern media and academia by depraved owners, it should be no surprise that the most inept, incompetent, and effete of "educated" sheeple have been trained to vote, reflexively, for insipid, lying fronts for oligarchic collectivists.  Blasio, Pelosi, Schumer, McCain, Hillary, Barack -- Great Vomiting Zeus!

*************

I have no reason to doubt that your intentions are probably good. Indeed, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. However, if, by some miracle, Bernie had been elected, I have little faith that he would have withstood the oligarchy that so obviously controls the Dem Party and seeks its profits by keeping the country divided in order to make it all the easier to rule it. I suspect, if Dems ever actually made any improvements for their snookered constituency, they would risk having them leave the Plantation. Can't have that. 

Bernie was not even willing to challenge Hillary concerning her thousands of deleted emails. Why believe he would have had the fortitude or means to stand up to the swamp that owns DC?

**************

If manliness refers to individual reliability, competence, strength, responsibility, and initiative, then the problem for the republic, if it wants to remain free instead of servile to despots, is too little manliness. Too many strong men and women have been trained from pre-school to post graduate studies, throughout school and employment, to cower to PC speech as approved by the oligarchy --- courtesy of divide-and-rule despots and their stooge femimen and feminazis.

Our Founders gave us a republic, if we could keep it. But most of our trained-to-whine-forever minorities, neo-students and neo-immigrants want to trade individual freedom and responsibility for fake free stuff and phony safe spaces. After they kill the republic, it will be interesting to see how much free stuff they can get out of its carcass.


*************

I called you a racist phobic misogynist to reflect Dem argot back onto you, precisely because, as Dems use such argot, it means precisely nothing. Even so, I don't believe you when you say you called Trump an oligarch for any reason other than his wealth. To suggest that a wealthy person cannot love the republic is stupid. You are hardly the first to fail to appreciate that a person can be wealthy and not be an anti-American.
You say you are for democracy. Democracy is little more than mob rule. Likely, you would be for the stupidity of election by direct majority vote. We have a representative republic. Big difference.
You strain on gnats while you swallow camels. The problem for the republic is not with wealthy people. The problem is from Establishmentarian Oligarchs (and their stooges) who want to destroy the republic. They want open borders so they can import enough liberty-illiterates like yourself to destroy the republic. Trump wants to make the republic great again. Establishmentarian Oligarchs want to cannibalize America and sink it into an open bordered NWO, in which the Constitution and Founding Ideals would be made meaningless. That is the elephant in the room.
I suspect whatever alternative to Trump you may fancy, he/she would be an advocate for open borders, mob rule, and the replacement of the Constitution with some kind of ginned up International Law.
Public and private education, like MSM, has become little more than a tool for raising stooges who cower before PC. Whatever takes power away from the central apparatus to dictate education requirements, I tend to be for it. Rick Perry is where he needs to be, to help dismantle the Department of Energy. As to why you think Ben Carson or Sarah Sanders are oligarchs, I have no idea.
Every thinking person knows the reason the Establishmentarian Oligarchs hate Trump is because they cannot control him and he wants to make the republic great again. Using Hillary, they came so close to destroying and cannibalizing the republic that they are beside themselves with hate.
Why do you want the gov to create fake jobs, instead of getting the gov out of the way so industry can create real jobs? Why do you ignore the uptick in economic indicators?
I find your analysis to be puerile.
If you have a person in mind who would be more qualified, energetic, and effective to combat the Establishmentarian Oligarchy that wants to destroy and replace the republic, then name him or her. I need a good laugh.

************

I wonder how many Lefties who talk about equality, fairness, and social justice are taking the Saudi money? PC has nothing to do with morality and everything to do with corruption. We are taking our PC from corrupt mouthpieces. Too many have lost their faith, lost their moral compass, and found it in their financial interests to become double-talking apologists and cheap trolls for people-farming buyers. Just look at MSM. Given corruption run amuck, talk of social justice is a bad joke. Apart from taking pleasure in beating, raping, and grooming innocent people, what are the values and principles of Dino-Rino-Aino Floaters?

There seems to be an uptick of Lefty trolls. Is Soros funding Russian trolls to help the international oligarchy destroy every representative republic, to replace them all with smug elitists prescribing PC? Shut up and eat your gulag?

Soros and various Russians both see the benefit of keeping the peasants divided in order to make it easier to farm them. Russians are sewing discord for the purpose of dividing and weakening America. Soros is sewing discord for the purpose of replacing the republic with the NWO open society of elitist rule under oligarchs.
Soros just assigned 18 Billion to his cynically named pro-democracy foundation. He funds many outlets for pursuing his cynically named open society. https://newstarget.com/2017-04-26-soros-news-publishes-the-complete-list-of-200-organizations-and-front-groups-for-the-evil-globalist-george-soros-think-progress-media-matters-and-more.html.
Soros funds trolls. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jul/14/beware-the-george-soros-zombies/. To think no Russians would apply to make use of such funding would be silly.
Do you also doubt there is an alliance-in-practice among various Lefties, Oligarchs, Wahhabis, Marxists, Anarchists, BLM, La Raza, ADL, NAACP, Pedophiles, Aliens, Dopers, Criminals, and Sophists?



You confuse indoctrination with education. As if elitists should tell Americans how they must think. Indoctrination is not necessary. You teach honest history. How and why America was founded. What its founding values were. How, if you disagree with those founding values, you are free to leave.

No, not all children have equal rights under the Constitution. Some children are not Americans. Under the Declaration of Independence, people are recognized to have an equal right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The Constitution has never accorded equal rights to everyone. It has never accorded you an equal right to use my property. It would be a monstrosity if it made such an attempt.

You seem to be conflating rights with falsely claimed entitlements. Or with affirmative action to "correct" past injustices, as you would cynically define them. You are a sophist who thinks himself wise. Think more, soph less.



In a representative republic, children of any competence should be raised to be able to think for themselves. The nation ought not be put under the mercy of trained incompetents and PC despots. Once liberty-illiterates are the voting majority, the republic is lost. Likely forever.



Ironic. The more Leftists invade, indoctrinate, and divide Americans, the more America becomes easy prey for operatives of foreign oligarchs, and the less America remains functional as a representative republic. Leftists WANT the open society. They WANT the destruction of the representative republic. They WANT rule by elitists prescribing PC. Yet, they pretend to be offended by operatives seeking to help them destroy the republic, while they blame those who want to re-invigorate the republic for the very foreign depredations sought by Leftists. As foreign predators help Leftists "resist" the destruction of the republic, by helping them to destroy it. Such is the insanity of many Leftists.

The more liberty-illiterates we indoctrinate, import, incite, and bribe, the less suitable we become for our founding ideals. At this rate, we will soon make it a self-fulfilling prophecy that we are simply no longer suited to self-governance. Rather, we will become suited only for marrying the government. After which the government, as handmaiden to oligarchs, will "respect" our "equality and fairness" (free stuff and safe spaces) in much the same way a Wahhabi respects the independent dignity of his wife/harem. Seeking security in trade for independence, we will be given enserfment.



We need to learn how to walk and chew gum at the same time. How to incentivize work, while not allowing oligarchs to buy the republic. We especially need to restore manliness to check the feminine drive for security by marrying the government, as it clothes wolves in lamb wool. Nowadays, free enterprise is too often conflated with the buying and selling of political influence. We need to free our citizens from the tyrannical agglomeration of the central government.

Notwithstanding The Mooch, if manliness refers to individual reliability, competence, strength, responsibility, and initiative, then the problem for the republic, if it wants to remain free instead of servile to despots, is too little manliness. Too many strong men and women have been trained from pre-school to post graduate studies, throughout school and employment, to cower to PC speech as approved by the oligarchy --- courtesy of divide-and-rule despots and their stooge femimen and feminazis.

Our Founders gave us a republic, if we could keep it. But most of our trained-to-whine-forever minorities, neo-profs, neo-students, and neo-immigrants want to trade individual freedom and responsibility for fake free stuff and phony safe spaces. After their open society and neo-elite oligarchs kill the republic, it will be interesting to see how much free stuff they and their stooges can get out of its carcass.

***********

If Trump is for the Established Oligarchy, then why are so many among them so hatefully aligned against him? As I thought, you are simply not a serious person, much less any kind of thinker. Who would make a better fighter against the Established Oligarchy that seeks to destroy the republic? For what possible candidate do you advocate? Waiting. Waiting. If you have no answer, I wonder who is paying you?

**************

Oligarchs favored Hillary because they did not take Bernie seriously. Had they taken him seriously and funded him, how much of him would they have owned? If Bernie could not even stand up to denounce Hillary's criminal destruction of emails, why should anyone expect he would have stood up against the likes of Soros? 

Much of Bernie's base consists of college kids seeking forgiveness for bad investments in their "educations." As more and more ingrates are chain imported, how can anyone expect this kind of base could draw any lines against unlimited "free stuff" to be claimed from the hairy (pun intended) godmother gov? 

Alexis de Tocqueville quote ---
“The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money.” Bernie's brand of national socialism based on targeting a particular race has been tried before. It did not end well.




Wednesday, October 25, 2017

Dude


From the Church of the Latter Day Dudes
The African Biglebowski spider is named after The Dude.
Walter Sobchak was a neocon.

I was one of the authors of the Port Huron Statement.
Mr. Treehorn treats objects like women, man.
You threw out a ringer for a ringer.
The Dude abides.
You human paraquat (herbicide).
Darker than a black steer's tukas on a moonless prairie night.
Hey, nice marmet.
I kill your fing car, man.
The plane has crashed into the mountain.
El Duderino.
This is not Nam.  It's bowling.  There are rules.
Don't micturate on my rug.
Does the Pope shit in the woods?
You want a toe?  I can get you a toe.
We believe in nossink.
Hey careful, Man.  There's a beverage here.

White Russian:  https://youtu.be/P97PuL0hLOg

Conundrums: Architect of Matrix


HIGGS???
DO PHOTONS OR GLUONS SPIN???

***********

As I have been led to believe, String Theory is based on an idea of unprovable tiny loops of two dimensional strings, whose vibrations function to produce all of physically measurable substance. These unprovable strings are thought by some to constitute the ultimate "physical" things from which all other physical things are derived. However, these strings are so far beyond physical measurement that to call them physical rather than metaphysical is a stretch in logic-based conceptualization. So string theory seems to have waned in popularity as a basis for a Theory of Everything.  If a consistent, coherent, complete theory of everything is impossible for mortals to achieve, then perhaps the best that can be done is to try to approach such a theory as closely as possible and in a way that does not unduly damage civilizing good faith and good will.

Although not complete, the idea underlying String Theory seems to avail a kind of math-based consistency. No one knows (or can know?) the ultimate nature or character of such postulated, but unprovable, strings. In that sense, conceptualizing them is a stretch to metaphysics.  So the math seems to be based on connecting meta vibrations to physically measurable vibrations.

But what could account for those meta strings and the math-based system they obey? Must such strings (or whatever the idea of them is meant to represent) be of a purely inanimate and unconscious nature, or may they be indicative of a correlative conscious character? No human can know or prove.

Yet, we can intuit and experience.  We have more than five senses.  We also have a sense of math, of balance and of being.  We can note how conscious observations seem to be fundamental to the way the cosmos finds expression.  Something about the unfoldment seems to require consciousness, as if a system of consciousness were innate.  That is interesting, even though its nature may be beyond math or science-based proof.  The apparent innateness of Consciousness, is, I think, a reasonable basis for moral belief systems that can help guide civilizing good faith and good will.  More so than just trusting to elitist, priestly, or expert diktat to rule the mass of sheeple and fill their snowflaky heads with phony ideas about equality, fairness, free stuff, safe spaces, and "science of morality."

**************

Being Spin 1 makes a particle a photon or gluon.

????????????????????Spin of Consciousness generates a shared space-time geometry field for Perspectives of Consciousness to apply math to communicate about their shared field.  The space-time field is accompanied by a field that allows photons and gluons (they have Spin 1) to pass through at c-speed, but it slows all other particles, giving them a property called mass.  At smallest levels, Spin may represent as measurable charge or potential.  Spin can avail separate-like integrity.  Spinning particles cannot actually touch, but they can break down and alter one another's spin-field.  If Information is conveyed to them at c-speed (by massless particles), it can be induced to orbit them and influence their spin field without necessarily destroying their integral identify.  Massless particles can convey Information only by losing their identities.  Can they convey Information, but not, except at origination, receive it????????????

***********

The potential for unfolding creation out of what atheists otherwise want to call "nothingness" is indeed astonishing.

Even so, so long as mortal communications about measurables rely on shared rules within a shared cosmos defined by a shared system of math-based parameters, what we take to be our physics (science) remains subject to those parameters.   Even as they flux.

While we can qualitatively appreciate the potential of the Author of the math-based science of our cosmos, we cannot quantitatively measure or command the potential of that Author. We occupy only a very limited perspective of that Author, mathematically spun a-part from Him/Her/It.  Our qualitative relationship is one of limiting appreciation, not knowledge. Receptivity, not command. Faith, not science. Good will, not personal pleasure.   We could not know or be told all that the Author knows without becoming the Author.

In our politics, we enjoy participatory will, to seek a decent basis for society.  One that does not sub-humanize us or make the masses serfs for elites, fakers, priests, despots, or oligarchs.  Since we can enjoy a feedback relationship of participatory will with our Creator, why should we settle for less in our relationship with our earthly wannabe rulers (elites, fakers, priests, despots, and oligarchs)?

************

By "Spin" I mean Holistic Consciousness adopts a Perspective a-part of Itself, limited to an Algorithm shared among all similar Perspectives a-part from Itself.

The Spin is in respect of an Algorithm that defines a math-field a-part from the Holistic Consciousness.  It may engage in differently allowed kinds of mathematical rates, vectors, vibrations, charges, fluxes.  But all Spins must be reconcilable.  They may be broken, redirected, reattached, etc.  But always subject to such quanta-limits as are defined by the Algorithm.  This is not to suggest that the Algorithm can ever be subject to the consistent, coherent, complete understanding of human beings.  The quanta-limits are necessary to facilitate the integrity of separately identifiable parts and perspectives.

The Spin is such that Holistic Consciousness can measure the parts, but such measurable parts cannot scientifically measure the Holistic Consciousness.

***********

Many people would rather gloss over the issue of a God, reasoning that His/her nature would be inscrutable to mere mortals --- even if God exists.  Many people prefer to conceptualize as if the cosmos (and maybe some anti-cosmos?) arose from a kind of crack in symmetry (Big Bang?) in otherwise nothingness.  However, if creation arose from this "nothingness," then it abided (existed?) as a strange kind of nothingness, since IT had capacity to bring forth the cosmos. 

So I prefer to conceptualize IT not as nothingness, but as a mysterious, immeasurable somethingness, able to produce the cosmos out of little more than Itself operating with a math-based algorithm.  I would call IT holistic Consciousness, to distinguish IT from plant-like or even mortal consciousness.

Even so, if such holistic Consciousness were a thing-in-itself, then how would it produce any physical thing to relate to, compare, or measure?  Perhaps a concept of spin might help, even if mainly math based.  If an Originator had capacity to spin Aspects Of Itself in respect of a common algorithm, then apparently separate and innate senses of beingness and balance may arise.  Add more organization and complexity, and all the other mortal senses could emerge and arise.  The appearance of physicality is not about the measurement of any thing-in-itself.  It is about shared interpretation of relationships.  Without shared perspectives of a unifying source of Consciousness, there would be no physicality to interpret.

Indeed, some mathematicians seem reasonably to believe that all that we take as being "physical" (measurable particles) is comprised of some kind of non-physical aspects, often "spinning" in respect of their Originator and a shared and defining math-field.

But how might that make faith in a guiding God reasonable?  It would still leave God as inscrutable and immeasurable.  However, by studying how the cosmos functions (what God produces?), one may ascertain practical measurables.  By fruits, one may judge some general aspects.  One may consider:  Why would the Originator sponsor a math field specially designed to produce mortal perspectives of consciousness?  Why, unless IT is appreciatively Purposeful with regard to the unfolding of such cosmos, would IT exercise such capacity?

If, at base, mortals are organized systems of inter-functions of spins of otherwise holistic consciousness, that would seem to implicate a feedback relationship.  That feedback would seem to entail aspects of innate good faith and good will.  IOW, the Great Commandment and the Golden Rule.  With which much of Western philosophy of religion and morality are dependent.

Intuitively, if one values Western Civilization, belief in a purposeful and astonishing Holistic Consciousness is not unreasonable.  It can help foster civilizing feelings of good faith and good will.  YOLO, otoh, seems often to foster depravity, corruption, and people-abusing.  Witness the depredations of lefty preachers from Hollywood and DC.  While Believers sin, they feel shame.  When Lefties run afoul of PC limits, they seek fake treatment (preferably where they cannot be extradited).  (When you have no principles, it's far easier not to be a hypocrite concerning principles.)


THING IN ITSELF V. NO-THING-NESS:  IF there was a time/place, math field, or potentiality before measurable existentiality, IT would seem to make more sense, conceptually, to think of it not as nothing, but as immeasurable something.  Something that itself did not sponsor measurement ... until in math a crack was defined, split into two or more loci of spin, whereupon, in respect of comparison of such spins, relative, relational, and comparative ... measurements could be sponsored.  Not measurement of Itself, but of what IT sponsored.

Perspective of Consciousness, Spin, Math Field.

Are Photons, Gravitons, Massless Particles, Spinless Particles, and Dark Matter and Dark Energy ... math-based artifacts of Perspectives of Consciousness spinning in association with a specially designed Math Field?  Is Space-Time math-based artifactual of the Math Field's influence on sequencing transfers of Information between Perspectives of Consciousness?  Are limitations on how math-based mortal Perspectives can be complexly organized likewise derivative of the Math Field's influence with Holistic Consciousness?  Based on a concept of mortal Consciousness as a spin off from Holistic Consciousness, can an algorithm for terms for its math-base be conceptualized in consistent, coherent, and complete terms?


Holistic Consciousness, but for functioning with an algorithm of math, specially tuned to it, would be a lonely ephemeral.  However, IT has found or designed or unfolded with ... such an algorithm.  To give expression to our cosmos.  Such capacity is astonishing.  Ask:  Why, unless IT is appreciatively Purposeful with regard to the unfolding of such cosmos, would IT exercise such capacity?  Intuitively, belief in a purposeful and astonishing Holistic Consciousness is not unreasonable.

Programmed Consciousness:  Programming algorithms (math) interfaced to be applied to electrons can organize and produce higher levels of self aware (human like) consciousness.  Lower level Consciousness can be locked in, so as to be limited to its allowed range for receiving and transmitting Information.

**********

MATH:  Among some powerful mathematicians, suspicion is growing that our cosmos really may be comprised of not much more than an algorithmic design for a field of math. That the physical appearances and properties expressed with it are derivative of a capacity in innate Consciousness (God?) to spin (vibrate?) and organize into different perspectives that are only temporally separate. This would seem not necessarily to discredit God, but to enhance a way of thinking about God.

COORDINATION OF CRACKED SYMMETRY:  I don't know how the Spins occur.  (Is each spin a spin in space-time?  Is each spin a way to separate temporally from the Holism?  Does the Holism spin around it?  Is each spin a co-relation with Consciousness and Math?)  Regardless, the spin is what avails the Crack in the Symmetry of an otherwise void space-time-landscape.

PARTICIPATORY WILL: When two or more Perspectives receive Information from the same source, each will collapse, store, interpret it somewhat differently, depending on its local situation, orientation, organization, experience, and conditioning.  Then, when they transmit and communicate regarding that Information, they will engage in a feedback process, to make the situation more commonly appreciable between them.  That is, they will each participate in affecting how the Information is accumulated, renormalized, reconciled, and interpreted.  This process of renormalization, reconciliation, and reinterpretation is perpetual.  The consequence is complex patterns and organization, unfolding to complex interpretation, complex senses, complex civilizations, and complex interpretive feedback among Participating Wills.  Indeed, many such interactions will defy prediction, except possibly under general and changing models of statistical analysis --- perhaps often to the surprise even of Holistic Will.

************

Consciousness sensed of what?  The most fundamental of senses would be the Sense of Beingness and the Sense of Balance.  A Being that takes a Perspective of a Spin would correlate in Math with a sense of balance.   By building on such fundamental senses, all kinds and organizations of senses less than that of the Holism would be possible and/or expressed.


Holistic Consciousness:  Holistic Consciousness relates the math under which Simple Consciousness, Substance, and Information are activated and coordinated.

Simple Consciousness:  Simple Consciousness, without spin, would be of a massless quality.  With spin, it acquires a qualitative capacity, from an otherwise dimension-less Point of relational Spin, to receive and transmit math-based Information.

Consciousness of Consciousness:  Consciousness of Consciousness is Complex Consciousness that abides with an organized and adopted system of Matter.

Consciousness of Self:  Consciousness of Self is Complex Consciousness that appreciates and apprehends that it abides with an organized and adopted system of Matter.

Substance:  Substance abides with a quantifiable capacity to collapse, Re-present, store, and transmit measurable Information.  It can abide as Matter, Energy, and/or both.  Substance is comprised of a stored accumulation of Information.

Information:  Information consists in an accumulation and reconciliation of previously sequenced Representations of Substance.  Information is comprised of previous re-presentations of Substance.

Physical Size, density, and occupation of space-time (physicality) are all derivative of no-thing other than Holistic Consciousness taking sequential Perspectives under a math-based system of algorithms.

Cosmos:
The Existential Cosmos relates to the quantitative and qualitative "sum" of Consciousness, Substance, and Information. 
The Measurable Cosmos relates only to quantifiable aspects of Substance and Information.

Do Perspectives of Consciousness spin in space-time?  Or does space-time spin around Perspectives of Consciousness?  Is the appearance of spin purely math-based, without need of geometry?  Is every spinning sponsored by Holistic Consciousness an expression of particular, Simple Consciousness?What matter can absorb matter?

Holistic Consciousness, but for functioning with an algorithm of math specially tuned to it, would be a lonely ephemeral.  However, IT has found or designed or unfolded with ... such an algorithm. To give expression to our cosmos.  Such capacity is astonishing.  Ask:  Why, unless IT is appreciatively Purposeful with regard to the unfolding of such cosmos, would IT exercise such capacity?  Intutitively, belief in a purposeful and astonishing Holistic Consciousness is not unreasonable.


*********

A republic that reviles the Godhead soon withers into nothingness, to be transmogrified into God knows what? America rocketed within a short two centuries, and know-it-all wanna-rule elites may doom it in a much shorter time.

*********************************

CONSCIOUSNESS:  Although Consciousness may transition among systems, layers, and levels, it retains an unending, math-based commonality:  An immeasurable quality of appreciating, experiencing, accumulating, exchanging, and communicating an unfolding of measuring.  "You" are a math-based, spatial-temporal, fluxing expression of a perspective of C.


CONUNDRUMS:

From wherever and to wherever a Perceiver measures cumulative material density, his calculation will tend towards the same eventual measure of density in all directions. (Apart from the Godhead, there is no real center to the cosmos.    How can that be, unless the superior reality is more math-like than substance-like?)

Whenever and wherever a Receiver absorbs EMR or massless radiation, from whatever direction, regardless of the relative motion of the Receiver, the EMR is received by it at the same speed (unless some of the light passes through a medium other than empty space). (There is no real grid by which to compare and measure the absolute locus of any place or time.    How can that be, unless the superior reality is more math like than substance like?)

Neither matter nor energy seem to be built up from any ultimate building particle-in-itself. All measurable expressions of Substance are comprised of particles that, for their expression, require relationships with other particles. (No measurable thing has reality-in-itself.    How can that be, unless the superior reality is more math-like than substance like?)

No Perspective, and no Perception, remains precisely the same across the passage of time. (No mortal measurer remains constant.    How can that be, unless the superior reality is more math like than substance like?)

However, some standards remain practically the same across different lengths of time. Because of that overlap, things can appear to be physical and they can be measured and communicated relationally and sequentially, for practical purposes. (Why communication is possible.)

However, because of flux, no precise measure can be made of the entire cosmos -- either in its manifestation, its potentiality, or its origin. Substance, for its measurability, is not in itself sufficient. (Why materialism is defective philosophy and why mortals cannot rule the cosmos.)

When substantive things are related or measured, what is really being related or measured?  Why do some forms, as gross forms (not as ultimate-bit forms) function at gross levels as attractants or repellants of other forms?  Why is some Information received, interpreted, and absorbed, while other potentialities of Information are not?  What guides, reconciles, chooses, or rules how some gross forms of Substance and Information continue to influence one another, while others do not?  Can it really make sense to conceptualize that all the math is pre-set?

Apart from dna, what else may control how forms interfunction, grow, and pass away? If Consciousness is fundamental to the process, what is Consciousness, and how are Perspectives of it guided to interfunction? Is there a matrix of purely "algorithmic-dna" that sets parameters or selects permissible forms for Perspectives of Consciousness and what they are allowed to perceive? (How the unfolding creation is intelligent.)

Ultimately, must the superior from which all apparent Substance and Information are derived be Consciousness (God?) operating with Algorithms of Math? Architect of Fractals of Matrix? With what innate empathy and methods of leveraging may IT relate to us? How elegantly simple is what appears to be complex? (How the Godhead reconciles with Mortals).

***********************

Maybe America will get a second change, if its people reconnect more to the Godhead than to false-promising stooges and pleasure-swindlers for godforsaken oligarchs.

*************

CONSCIOUSNESS:  Although Consciousness may transition among systems, layers, and levels, it retains an unending, math-based commonality:  an immeasurable quality of appreciating, experiencing, accumulating, exchanging, and communicating an unfolding of measuring.  "You" are a math-based, spatial-temporal, fluxing expression of a perspective of Consciousness.  Consciousness has to do with the Reconciliation and Interpretation of Information, as limited by speed of c.

THE EMR FORCE:  EMR (and massless radiation) has to do with the transmission, storage, and reception of Information.

THE STRONG AND WEAK FORCES:  The Strong and Weak Forces have to do with the integration and disintegration of loci for Perspectives of Consciousness.

SPACE-TIME:  Space-Time, as a medium for allowing Substantive interfunctioning to occur in sequentially measurable patterns, exists only insofar as such patterns also avail the expression of Perspectives of Consciousness.

QUESTION:  Can information from nuclear forces (Strong and Weak forces) be transmitted, received, stored, or interpreted without the influence of "c" (the limiting and constant speed for massless particles)?  Can any Perspective (present or potential) of Consciousness function without influence of C?  While protons and neutrons are expressed much larger than electrons and photons, what about their quanta components?  Apart from fuzz or Reconciling Consciousness, can nuclear quanta components store or convey Information in bits "smaller than," and free of, photons?  No.  Quarks carry mass.

For our math-verse, a nucleus can become free of electrons, but it will only provide a locus for a Perspective of Consciousness insofar as it helps receive, store, transmit, and interpret Information limited via C.

***********

If a system of math-based algorithms defines and limits our cosmos, it is based around Consciousness and its various perspectives.  Not around any material things in themselves.  The things around each Perspective of Consciousness are treated, for that Perspective, AS IF they were real in themselves.  And such treatment is normalize-able and reconcile-able for every Perspective, so every Perspective will sense AS IF it were at the center of the measurable density and sequential unfolding of the observable cosmos.

***************



SPEED C:

The speed "c" is special in that it is a universal constant for all particles (such as photons and gluons) with zero rest mass that carry only kinetic energy.  Although they carry energy, they are zero-rest-massless so long as they travel at the speed of light.  This allows integration of the concepts of measurable space, time, matter and energy.  Every zero-rest-massless particle in a vacuum must travel at the speed of EMR.  A zero-rest-massless EMR particle, to be created in an otherwise vacuum, must be traveling in all frames at the speed of light.   Its only mass is the square of its Lorentz-invariant momentum fourvector P (a vector of energy and the normal 3d momentum p), which is 0 in all frames. 

Light bends due to gravity only because space-time curves such that anything traveling at c is considered to have "relativistic mass."  This is possible only because time and distance measurements differ for different observers, even though whatever chronological sequences they can share remain protectedThe bending of transmissions of massless energy would seem also to have to do with how every reception of Information can participate in preserving to every Perspective an appearance that our cosmos tends to equal cumulative density in all directions.

Since your body is not massless, it cannot reach c.  If it could, its clock would stop ticking.  Anything that travels at c is massless and would be observed as traveling at c by everyone who could observe it.  W

While you cannot travel through space-time faster than c, can you warp through space-time faster than c?  Were you to warp (alter your space-time locus instantaneously) back and forth, rather than travel, you would not be altering chronologies.

Photons carry the electromagnetic force, but are not charged themselves and do not interact via this force. Photons have relativistic mass and interact with gravity, but not with their own forces.

Gluons are carriers of the Strong force.  Both photons and gluons travel in a vacuum at c.  They do have relativistic mass, which acts as a gravity charge.

A Neutrino that changes flavors as it travels is not massless.  A Muon has mass and can be broken into an electron and two neutrinos.

A Photon, in itself, is not matter.  It has zero rest mass, but it does have relativistic mass.  When confined or stored to a system, a photon does increase the mass of the system.  Matter is stored energy.

Quarks are never directly observed or found in isolation.  Quarks have various intrinsic properties, including electric charge, mass, color charge, and spin.  Quarks are the only elementary particles in the Standard Model of particle physics to experience all four fundamental interactions, also known as fundamental forces (electromagnetism, gravitation, strong interaction, and weak interaction), as well as the only known particles whose electric charges are not integer multiples of the elementary charge.

A Graviton is a hypothetical elementary particle that mediates the force of gravitation in the framework of quantum field theory (QFT).

Like photons, gravitons also carry (relativistic) mass, but unlike photons and gluons, they carry the gravitational force which interacts with this mass. As well as gravitons having to thus interact with other gravitons, quantum mechanics means they must also interact with themselves via virtual particles. Understanding these interactions of gravitons' own relativistic mass with their own force is a qualitatively different kind of problem from modelling other types of bosons and is what leads to the renormalization issues.

It would seem that a concept of gravitons, if helpful, should relate Consciousness to a system of math such that every Perspective will experience general mass as if it tends to cumulative equal density (flatness) in all directions, even though of differing densities in near distances.

Most theories containing gravitons suffer from severe problems. Attempts to extend the Standard Model or other quantum field theories by adding gravitons run into serious theoretical difficulties at energies close to or above the Planck scale. This is because of infinities arising due to quantum effects; technically, gravitation is not renormalizable. Since classical general relativity and quantum mechanics seem to be incompatible at such energies, from a theoretical point of view, this situation is not tenable. One possible solution is to replace particles with strings. String theories are quantum theories of gravity in the sense that they reduce to classical general relativity plus field theory at low energies, but are fully quantum mechanical, contain a graviton, and are thought to be mathematically consistent.

It would seem that no Information can be transmitted without entailment, at some level, of c.  But for c, no field of math could be actively expressed, nor could any sequential record of unfoldment of Substance be preserved.

A photon would seem to function as a bit of stored Information.  Its transmission of Information diffuses in waves, until it is collapsed/absorbed to an expression of materiality.  As it is absorbed by matter, its wave function may collapse to a particle wherewith energy is transmitted to an electron to excite it from whatever orbit it may have been attached, as in the case of a photoelectric effect. 

Every body of matter constitutes a locus for an experience of Perspective of Consciousness, at some level.  That experience need not relate to human-like sense organs.  It may relate to sensations innate to spin, vibration (heat), amplitude, cumulative intensity, and so on.

Consciousness is innate to the expression of the cosmos.  Consciousness functioning with a c-based system of math avails geometrical forms for giving expression to measurable existentiality.  When Consciousness produces spin, it avails forms that avail various Perspectives of itself.  Spin, charge, polarity, structure, density have to do with the various geometrical forms of particles and waves that we interpret and experience as matter and energy.  They avail the organization, reception, storage, collapse, sensation, interpretation, and transmission of Information and communications.  Consciousness feeds back to affect how expressions of Substance and Information unfold, accumulate, and reconcile.

The relative density of our "flat" universe, as we tend to measure it, has to do with the maturing quality of our Perspectives of Consciousness, from simple consciousness of existentiality to complex sense-based awareness of self.





Thursday, October 19, 2017

Speed of Transmission of Information Limited by Character of Consciousness


Holistic Consciousness:  Holistic Consciousness relates the math under which Simple Consciousness, Substance, and Information are activated and coordinated.

Simple Consciousness:  Simple Consciousness is a massless and qualitative capacity, from an otherwise dimension-less Point of relational Spin, to receive and transmit Information.

Consciousness of Consciousness:  Consciousness of Consciousness is Complex Consciousness that abides with an organized and adopted system of Matter.

Consciousness of Self:  Consciousness of Self is Complex Consciousness that appreciates and apprehends that it abides with an organized and adopted system of Matter.

Substance:  Substance abides with a quantifiable capacity to collapse, Re-present, store, and transmit measurable Information.  It can abide as Matter, Energy, and/or both.  Substance is comprised of a stored accumulation of Information.

Information:  Information consists in an accumulation and reconciliation of previously sequenced Representations of Substance.  Information is comprised of previous re-presentations of Substance.

Physical Size, density, and occupation of space-time (physicality) are all derivative of no-thing other than Holistic Consciousness taking Perspectives under a math-based system of algorithms.

Cosmos:
The Existential Cosmos relates to the quantitative and qualitative "sum" of Consciousness, Substance, and Information. 
The Measurable Cosmos relates only to quantifiable aspects of Substance and Information.

Do Perspectives of Consciousness spin in space-time?  Or does space-time spin around Perspectives of Consciousness?  Is the appearance of spin purely math-based, without need of geometry?  Is every spinning sponsored by Holistic Consciousness an expression of particular, Simple Consciousness?What matter can absorb matter?

*************

CONSCIOUSNESS:  Although Consciousness may transition among systems, layers, and levels, it retains an unending, math-based commonality:  An immeasurable quality of appreciating, experiencing, accumulating, exchanging, and communicating an unfolding of measuring.  "You" are a math-based, spatial-temporal, fluxing expression of a perspective of C.


CONUNDRUMS:

From wherever and to wherever a Perceiver measures cumulative material density, his calculation will tend towards the same eventual measure of density in all directions. (Apart from the Godhead, there is no real center to the cosmos.    How can that be, unless the superior reality is more math like than substance like?)

Whenever and wherever a Receiver absorbs EMR, from whatever direction, regardless of the relative motion of the Receiver, the EMR is received by it at the same speed (unless some of the light passes through a medium other than empty space). (There is no real grid by which to compare and measure the absolute locus of any place or time.    How can that be, unless the superior reality is more math like than substance like?)

Neither matter nor energy seem to be built up from any ultimate building particle-in-itself. All measurable expressions of Substance are comprised of particles that, for their expression, require relationships with other particles. (No measurable thing has reality-in-itself.    How can that be, unless the superior reality is more math-like than substance like?)

No Perspective, and no Perception, remains precisely the same across the passage of time. (No mortal measurer remains constant.    How can that be, unless the superior reality is more math like than substance like?)

However, some standards remain practically the same across different lengths of time. Because of that overlap, things can appear to be physical and they can be measured and communicated relationally and sequentially, for practical purposes. (Why communication is possible.)

However, because of flux, no precise measure can be made of the entire cosmos -- either in its manifestation, its potentiality, or its origin. Substance, for its measurability, is not in itself sufficient. (Why materialism is defective philosophy and why mortals cannot rule the cosmos.)

When substantive things are related or measured, what is really being related or measured?  Why do some forms, as gross forms (not as ultimate-bit forms) function at gross levels as attractants or repellants of other forms?  Why is some Information received, interpreted, and absorbed, while other potentialities of Information are not?  What guides, reconciles, chooses, or rules how some gross forms of Substance and Information continue to influence one another, while others do not?  Can it really make sense to conceptualize that all the math is pre-set?

Apart from dna, what else may control how forms interfunction, grow, and pass away? If Consciousness is fundamental to the process, what is Consciousness, and how are Perspectives of it guided to interfunction? Is there a matrix of purely "algorithmic-dna" that sets parameters or selects permissible forms for Perspectives of Consciousness and what they are allowed to perceive? (How the unfolding creation is intelligent.)

Ultimately, must the superior from which all apparent Substance and Information are derived be Consciousness (God?) operating with Algorithms of Math? Architect of Fractals of Matrix? With what innate empathy and methods of leveraging may IT relate to us? How elegantly simple is what appears to be complex? (How the Godhead reconciles with Mortals).

***********************

Maybe America will get a second change, if its people reconnect more to the Godhead than to false-promising stooges and pleasure-swindlers for godforsaken oligarchs.

*************

CONSCIOUSNESS:  Although Consciousness may transition among systems, layers, and levels, it retains an unending, math-based commonality:  an immeasurable quality of appreciating, experiencing, accumulating, exchanging, and communicating an unfolding of measuring.  "You" are a math-based, spatial-temporal, fluxing expression of a perspective of Consciousness.  Consciousness has to do with the Reconciliation and Interpretation of Information, as limited by speed of c.

THE EMR FORCE:  EMR has to do with the transmission, storage, and reception of Information.

THE STRONG AND WEAK FORCES:  The Strong and Weak Forces have to do with the integration and disintegration of loci for Perspectives of Consciousness.

SPACE-TIME:  Space-Time, as a medium for allowing Substantive interfunctioning to occur in sequentially measurable patterns, exists only insofar as such patterns also avail the expression of Perspectives of Consciousness.

QUESTION:  Can information from nuclear forces (Strong and Weak forces) be transmitted, received, stored, or interpreted without the influence of C (the limiting and constant speed for massless particles)?  Can any Perspective (present or potential) of Consciousness function without influence of C?  While protons and neutrons are expressed much larger than electrons and photons, what about their quanta components?  Apart from fuzz or Reconciling Consciousness, can nuclear quanta components store or convey Information in bits "smaller than," and free of, photons?  No.  Quarks carry mass.

For our math-verse, a nucleus can become free of electrons, but it will only provide a locus for a Perspective of Consciousness insofar as it helps receive, store, transmit, and interpret Information limited via C.

***********

If a system of math-based algorithms defines and limits our cosmos, it is based around Consciousness and its various perspectives.  Not around any material things in themselves.  The things around each Perspective of Consciousness are treated, for that Perspective, AS IF they were real in themselves.  And such treatment is normalize-able and reconcile-able for every Perspective, so every Perspective will sense AS IF it were at the center of the measurable density and sequential unfolding of the observable cosmos.

***************



SPEED C:

The speed "c" is special in that it is a universal constant for all particles (such as photons and gluons) with zero rest mass that carry only kinetic energy.  Although they carry energy, they are zero-rest-massless so long as they travel at the speed of light.  This allows integration of the concepts of measurable space, time, matter and energy.  Every zero-rest-massless particle in a vacuum must travel at the speed of EMR.  A zero-rest-massless EMR particle, to be created in an otherwise vacuum, must be traveling in all frames at the speed of light.   Its only mass is the square of its Lorentz-invariant momentum fourvector P (a vector of energy and the normal 3d momentum p), which is 0 in all frames. 

Light bends due to gravity only because space-time curves such that anything traveling at c is considered to have "relativistic mass."  This is possible only because time and distance measurements differ for different observers, even though whatever chronological sequences they can share remain protectedThe bending of transmissions of massless energy would seem also to have to do with how every reception of Information can participate in preserving to every Perspective an appearance that our cosmos tends to equal cumulative density in all directions.

Since your body is not massless, it cannot reach c.  If it could, its clock would stop ticking.  Anything that travels at c is massless and would be observed as traveling at c by everyone who could observe it.  W

While you cannot travel through space-time faster than c, can you warp through space-time faster than c?  Were you to warp (alter your space-time locus instantaneously) back and forth, rather than travel, you would not be altering chronologies.

Photons carry the electromagnetic force, but are not charged themselves and do not interact via this force. Photons have relativistic mass and interact with gravity, but not with their own forces.

Gluons are carriers of the Strong force.  Both photons and gluons travel in a vacuum at c.  They do have relativistic mass, which acts as a gravity charge.

A Neutrino that changes flavors as it travels is not massless.  A Muon has mass and can be broken into an electron and two neutrinos.

A Photon, in itself, is not matter.  It has zero rest mass, but it does have relativistic mass.  When confined or stored to a system, a photon does increase the mass of the system.  Matter is stored energy.

Quarks are never directly observed or found in isolation.  Quarks have various intrinsic properties, including electric charge, mass, color charge, and spin.  Quarks are the only elementary particles in the Standard Model of particle physics to experience all four fundamental interactions, also known as fundamental forces (electromagnetism, gravitation, strong interaction, and weak interaction), as well as the only known particles whose electric charges are not integer multiples of the elementary charge.

A Graviton is a hypothetical elementary particle that mediates the force of gravitation in the framework of quantum field theory (QFT).

Like photons, gravitons also carry (relativistic) mass, but unlike photons and gluons, they carry the gravitational force which interacts with this mass. As well as gravitons having to thus interact with other gravitons, quantum mechanics means they must also interact with themselves via virtual particles. Understanding these interactions of gravitons' own relativistic mass with their own force is a qualitatively different kind of problem from modelling other types of bosons and is what leads to the renormalization issues.

It would seem that a concept of gravitons, if helpful, should relate Consciousness to a system of math such that every Perspective will experience general mass as if it tends to cumulative equal density (flatness) in all directions, even though of differing densities in near distances.

Most theories containing gravitons suffer from severe problems. Attempts to extend the Standard Model or other quantum field theories by adding gravitons run into serious theoretical difficulties at energies close to or above the Planck scale. This is because of infinities arising due to quantum effects; technically, gravitation is not renormalizable. Since classical general relativity and quantum mechanics seem to be incompatible at such energies, from a theoretical point of view, this situation is not tenable. One possible solution is to replace particles with strings. String theories are quantum theories of gravity in the sense that they reduce to classical general relativity plus field theory at low energies, but are fully quantum mechanical, contain a graviton, and are thought to be mathematically consistent.

It would seem that no Information can be transmitted without entailment, at some level, of c.  But for c, no field of math could be actively expressed, nor could any sequential record of unfoldment of Substance be preserved.

A photon would seem to function as a bit of stored Information.  Its transmission of Information diffuses in waves, until it is collapsed/absorbed to an expression of materiality.  As it is absorbed by matter, its wave function may collapse to a particle wherewith energy is transmitted to an electron to excite it from whatever orbit it may have been attached, as in the case of a photoelectric effect. 

Every body of matter constitutes a locus for an experience of Perspective of Consciousness, at some level.  That experience need not relate to human-like sense organs.  It may relate to sensations innate to spin, vibration (heat), amplitude, cumulative intensity, and so on.

Consciousness is innate to the expression of the cosmos.  Consciousness functioning with a c-based system of math avails geometrical forms for giving expression to measurable existentiality.  When Consciousness produces spin, it avails forms that avail various Perspectives of itself.  Spin, charge, polarity, structure, density have to do with the various geometrical forms of particles and waves that we interpret and experience as matter and energy.  They avail the organization, reception, storage, collapse, sensation, interpretation, and transmission of Information and communications.  Consciousness feeds back to affect how expressions of Substance and Information unfold, accumulate, and reconcile.

The relative density of our "flat" universe, as we tend to measure it, has to do with the maturing quality of our Perspectives of Consciousness, from simple consciousness of existentiality to complex sense-based awareness of self.



***********

If a system of math-based algorithms defines and limits our cosmos, it is based around Consciousness and its various perspectives.  Not around any material things in themselves.  The things around each P of C are treated, for that P, AS IF they were real in themselves.  And such treatment is normalize-able and reconcile-able for every P, so every P will sense AS IF it were at the center of the measurable density and sequential unfolding of the observable cosmos.

Speed of Transmission of Information Limited by Character of Consciousness

Consciousness is the immeasurable quality of experiencing measuring.
Information is the past sum of measurable experience up to the present.
Memory is stored Information that remains and is accessible to Consciousness.

Holistic Consciousness is the immeasurable quality of experiencing the present measuring of the system of algorithms that expresses any hypothetical sum of the cosmos and all that entails.
Substance is the incarnate present-ation of accumulated Information.  There abides a Nowness throughout the apparent cosmos, even though no mortal can normalize it for all possible cases.  Holistic Consciousness measures the system of math itself, and is not bound to apparent substantive limits of speed of communication. 

The math-system, with Consciousness, gives expression to apparent expressions of measurable Substance and its sequential collection as cumulatively stored Information.  Apparent Substance is its derivative, not its superior.  Our natural laws of Substance do not regulate the flux of the math-system itself, with Holistic Consciousness.  However, so long as Holistic Consciousness is entertained by the Substantive appearances that derive from its reconciliation with the math-system, it will flux and correlate in ways that preserve the appearance of natural laws regulating Substance and Information.  In that respect, Holistic Consciousness is both within and without the apparent cosmos.

Could a mass vectoring in empty space faster than the speed of light still receive direct Information from EMR, but only from that EMR that, in relation to it and its medium, is sensible as going at or below the speed of light?  Otherwise, what non-internal force could ever relate to it, to brake or slow it?

For a Black Hole, it seems no EMR or any other Substance escapes (except possible Information smudged out over a vast potentiality).  May a Black Hole supply a mechanism for converting Substance into rarefied Consciousness and smudged out Information?  How may general, rarefied C flux and adapt itself to adopt, identify with, and limit itself to a bodily represented Perspective?  Whatever the nature or character of the locus that can receive, collapse, interpret, and store Information, it is, at some level, a perspective of a reconciling Consciousness.

It is possible to produce a medium of water within which electrons may travel faster than photons.  In respect of such a medium, a perspective of Consciousness may measure some electrons to be traveling faster than some photons.  (????  In a water medium, perhaps not all of the same photons go unmolested.  Many may be absorbed, to convert from EMR to Substance/Information, then radiated back to EMR.  So the stream of conveyance may be slowed from what it would have been, had the photons been unmolested in empty space.  A random photoelectric effect may entail more slowness than a stream of electrons through a pre-charged medium.  ????)

Apart from such circumstances or mediums, no perspective of Consciousness will concurrently sense, receive, store, or interpret any bit of Information external to it unless such Information is transmitted, relative to it, at the speed of light.  This would apply even to trace evidence of the flux of the Strong and Weak Forces and the Force of Gravitation.  (Via algorithmically enhanced sense organs, Information concerning the motion of gross bodies can be sensed and interpreted, wherewith the gross bodies do not reach the relational speed of light.  However, such reception of gross Information is the interpretive product of a sequence of bit Information that is received at the speed of light.  We do not directly sense the gross bodies themselves.  Rather, we sense and interpret Information that is relayed from them via EMR.  Likewise, we do not ordinarily and directly sense non-EMR cosmic radiation.  Rather, we sense and interpret their traces, the bit-transmission of which is at the speed of EMR.)  No gross Information below the speed of EMR can be transmitted except if it accords with the cosmic system wherewith it is defined.

Non-mass, non-material, non-entangled Substance (like empty space between measurable particles) can expand faster than the speed of light.

Apart from special mediums, non-mass, non-material, and non-entangles Substances, no other S can remain integrated as a gross body and exceed the SOL.

Every locus of recordation of Information is such that it cannot be coherently sensed except as being cosmically surrounded by mass densities that within limits of calculus sum equally in all directions.  Measurement in respect of every available locus is re-normalizeable AS IF it were at a center of the cosmos.  No perspective of C that can have an idea of the cosmos can coherently abide except upon sensing and conceptualizing itself AS IF it were at the center of the cosmos.

Can only Holistic C be Omni-present and/or exceed the SOL?  Is Omni-C the only Omni-Substance?  How may it leverage to appreciate, apprehend, understand, reconcile all mortal perspectives of C?  With the math of fractals?

Only Holistic C can give intuitive warnings, beyond the SOL, to upcoming storms of photons.
But humanity can interpret correlations among gross bodies to warn of probabilities of upcoming storms of photons.

****************

Every presently measurable form is imbued with an identity, however expressed as spatially temporal, that gathers, receives, accumulates, stores, and exchanges levels and layers and fractals of overlapping and fluxing I.  Some fractal processes facilitate forms to express and feel awareness of self as an identity or perspective of C that is apart from the remainder of the cosmos.  Among fluxes of mortal expression, there abides C of being a part of the cosmos, as well as C of being apart from the cosmos. 

Fundamentally, all these perspectives of C constitute an immeasurable quality of appreciating, experiencing, accumulating, exchanging, and communicating an unfolding of measuring.  All are part of a system of math-based algorithms wherewith shared definition, limitation, and reconciliation is availed for our unfolding and conscious experiences of cosmos --- based around Consciousness and its various perspectives, but not actually based around any material things-in-themselves

Regardless of perspective, the common, perpetual, unbounded reference is:  Consciousness.  Consciousness is Consciousness --- even though it can entail reconciling Consciousness (holistic driving of math-based system), consciousness of cosmos but not of self (self perpetuating forms), and consciousness of limiting perspective of self (self aware forms).  Although Consciousness may transition among systems, layers, and levels, it retains an unending, math-based commonality:  an immeasurable quality of appreciating, experiencing, accumulating, exchanging, and communicating an unfolding of measuring.  "You" are a math-based, spatial-temporal, fluxing expression of a perspective of C.

Whatever the character, force, or system under which we are designed, expressed, reconciled, or judged, it could not express, judge, or reconcile us unless in some aspect or respect it remains involved with us.  Whatever its power or potentiality, it seems to be as open and unbounded as math. 

****************

TIME TRAVEL:

The speed of EMR in empty space is the limiting and usual speed at which any receptor can receive Information.  Information that may transmit there, faster than the speed of light, cannot be received by any mortal receptor/perspective.

Traveling instantaneously (warping between loci) would not alter the past or future or constitute time travel.  If I warped away from Earth faster than SOL and then warp-returned faster than SOL, I could at most have approached instantaneous travel, not travel into the past or future.

If I warp-travel instantly to a distant Star, I will arrive at its present time.  I will miss out on receiving much of the light/information from its distant past, that may still be bombarding Earth.  In this way, I may be able to go back and forth and remind Earth and Star people of Information from their past, but I would not be able to change their past.

No mortal P of C travels back and forth between past and future.  Rather, except in special cases, it simply receives whatever Information it receives at the limiting SOL.  By warp-exceeding the SOL, it would simply forego receiving some I that it would have received had it not traveled.

If instantaneous travel eventually becomes possible, it will be at the cost for the traveler of losing first hand experiences of Information.  It will not constitute time travel.